Periodic solutions for McKean-Vlasov SDEs under periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions

Jun Ma

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Periodic solutions for McKean-Vlasov SDEs under periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves existence, convergence, and parameter continuity of T-periodic measure-valued solutions for McKean-Vlasov SDEs under periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions.

desk verdict A useful lifted-space Lyapunov framework, but Theorem 4.3's projection step does not prove a periodic solution for the original MVSDE as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15416 v1 pith:AICZYTDZ submitted 2025-01-26 math.DS math.PR

Jun Ma This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DSmath.PR MSC 34C2560H10

keywords periodicsolutionsMcKean-Vlasovstochasticdifferentialequationsdistribution-dependentLyapunovconditionsMarkovprocessesKrylov-Bogoliubovtheoremconvergencecontinuousdependence

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equation, whose drift and diffusion may depend on the law of the solution itself, has a solution whose distribution repeats after a fixed period $T$. It proves that the answer is yes under a Lyapunov condition in which the Lyapunov function is periodic in time and depends on time, space, and the distribution variable. The proof lifts the dynamics to a Markov process on the product space $\mathbb{R}^d \times \mathcal P(\mathbb{R}^d)$, where the associated semigroup becomes linear and the classical Krylov-Bogolioubov compactness argument yields a $T$-periodic probability; projecting onto the space variable gives the desired $T$-periodic law for the original equation. The paper also proves weak convergence of solutions to the periodic regime along a subsequence, full convergence when the periodic law is unique, and continuous dependence of periodic solutions on parameters.

What carries the argument

The central object is the coupled McKean-Vlasov system (4.1), a pair of SDEs in which the second component has coefficients depending on the law of the first, so its transition probabilities define a Markov process on the lifted state space $\mathbb{R}^d \times \mathcal P(\mathbb{R}^d)$. Because the measure appears as an explicit coordinate, the associated semigroup (3.1) is linear, which is what makes a Krylov-Bogolioubov compactness argument available for a nonlinear mean-field problem. The periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov condition (H) supplies tightness: the generator $\mathcal L V$ tends to $-\infty$ outside large sets, giving the averaged escape-time bound (3.3) and the uniform control (3.4) needed to apply Theorem 3.10 and obtain a $T$-periodic probability $P_0$ on the lifted space. The final step in Theorem 4.3 takes the first-coordinate marginal of $P_0$ as the periodic law of the original MVSDE.

What would settle it

For any coefficient pair satisfying (H), compute the marginal $\pi_t(\cdot)=P_0(t,\cdot\times\mathcal P(\mathbb{R}^d))$ of the lifted $T$-periodic measure and compare it with the law at time $t$ of the original McKean-Vlasov equation started from $\pi_s$; a discrepancy at any $t>s$ would falsify Theorem 4.3. Alternatively, exhibiting a point $(x,\mu)$ in the support of $P_0$ with $\mu$ different from the law of the first coordinate would show that the projection step is not justified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 4.3: if the coupled McKean-Vlasov system built from $b$ and $\sigma$ has unique regular solutions and the periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov condition (H) holds, then the McKean-Vlasov SDE $dX_t = b(t,X_t,\mathcal L_{X_t})dt + \sigma(t,X_t,\mathcal L_{X_t})dW_t$ has a $T$-periodic solution in law. The periodic distribution is constructed as the projection $\pi_t(\cdot)=P_0(t,\cdot\times\mathcal P(\mathbb{R}^d))$ of a $T$-periodic probability $P_0$ on the lifted space $\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathcal P(\mathbb{R}^d)$ obtained for the coupled system. The paper further claims convergence of arbitrary solutions to this periodic law in the Cesaro sense along a subsequence, full-sequence convergence under uniqueness, and continuity of the periodic laws as the coefficients converge pointwise.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $T$-periodic probability $P_0$ on the lifted space $\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathcal P(\mathbb{R}^d)$ projects to a genuine solution of the original McKean-Vlasov equation, even though the proof does not show that $P_0$ is supported on consistent pairs $(x,\mu)$ with $\mu$ equal to the law of $x$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any McKean-Vlasov SDE with $T$-periodic coefficients, a periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov function, and unique regular solutions has a $T$-periodic measure-valued solution.
The periodic law is obtained as the first-coordinate projection of a $T$-periodic probability on $\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathcal P(\mathbb{R}^d)$, so the lifted Markov-process framework transfers Krylov-Bogolioubov compactness to nonlinear Fokker-Planck equations.
Weak convergence of solutions to the periodic law holds along a subsequence, and along the full sequence whenever the $T$-periodic law is unique.
Families of periodic solutions are tight and their weak limits are periodic solutions as the coefficients converge pointwise, giving continuous dependence on parameters.
For time-homogeneous coefficients the same theorem yields a stationary solution as a direct corollary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A point the paper leaves open is whether the lifted $T$-periodic measure $P_0$ is supported on consistent pairs $(x,\mu)$ with $\mu$ equal to the law of $x$; without that, the projection step in Theorem 4.3 is the part of the argument most worth checking.
The same lifting trick is likely to work for almost-periodic, recurrent, or asymptotically autonomous distribution-dependent dynamics, because the linearization by adding the measure as a coordinate does not rely on exact periodicity.
A natural testable strengthening would be to convert the Cesaro convergence into an explicit rate under stronger coercivity, analogous to exponential ergodicity results for time-periodic mean-field equations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

The genuinely new thing here is a periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov condition for McKean-Vlasov SDEs, obtained by working on the lifted space R^d × P(R^d). Section 3 gives a coherent Khasminskii-style criterion for existence, convergence, and parameter dependence of T-periodic Markov processes on that product space. The operator semigroup is linear on the product space, so the Krylov-Bogolioubov argument is legitimate there. Credit is due for seeing that the Lyapunov function should live on the joint space when the coefficients do.

The problem is Theorem 4.3, the central existence claim for the original MVSDE. The proof defines π_t(·) = P0(t, · × P(R^d)) from a T-periodic measure P0 on the lifted space. But the transition kernel P(s,(x,δ_x),t,·) describes the pair (X_t,L_{X_t}) when the first coordinate starts deterministically at x. Averaging this kernel over x ~ π_s does not evolve the MVSDE from initial law π_s: in the true MVSDE there is a single common mean-field coefficient L_{X_t^{s,π_s}}, while the averaged expression uses a different coefficient L_{X_t^{s,x}} for each starting point. One would need something like ∫ P(s,(x,π_s),t,·)π_s(dx), and then one would need to prove the periodic lifted measure has the consistent form ν(dy)δ_ν(dμ). The paper asserts this consistency rather than proving it. This is not cosmetic; it is the step that connects the lifted periodic Markov process to a solution of the nonlinear MVSDE. The stress-test note is right.

There is also an unstated regularity burden. The paper imports the notion of 'regular solutions' from the author's own works [19,21] without stating sufficient conditions for the convergence Y^n → X and for applying Itô's formula with the Lions derivative. A referee would have to verify those hypotheses in the examples. Theorem 4.8 is weaker than its title: it only proves tightness of periodic solutions, and Remark 4.9 concedes that the actual continuous-dependence conclusion needs growth conditions from [21].

Bottom line: the lifted Lyapunov framework is a sensible approach and Section 3 may be publishable on its own. But Theorem 4.3 as written is unproved. The gap is likely repairable—starting the Krylov-Bogolioubov construction from a diagonal point preserves consistency, and the consistent set is closed under weak limits—but the repair is real work, not a typo. I would send this to a referee with a clear request to examine the projection consistency and the regularity assumptions, not desk-reject it. Current form should not be accepted.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies T-periodic solutions of McKean–Vlasov SDEs under periodic, distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions. The strategy is to lift the original nonlinear problem to a Markov process on R^d × P(R^d), prove general criteria for periodic Markov processes in Section 3, and then apply them to coupled MVSDEs in Section 4. The main existence result is Theorem 4.3, with convergence and parameter-continuity results in Theorems 4.7 and 4.8, and illustrative examples in Section 5.

Significance. The high-level idea of linearizing the MVSDE semigroup by adding the law as a second coordinate is appropriate and gives a clean framework for Krylov–Bogoliubov arguments; the paper also develops useful equivalent conditions for periodic Markov processes on the product space. If Theorem 4.3 were proved, the result would be a meaningful extension of Khasminskii's periodic-Lyapunov method to distribution-dependent coefficients. However, the central projection step is not justified as written, and the regularity and uniformity assumptions are not fully specified. These are repairable in principle, so the manuscript has potential, but the main theorem is not established in the current form.

major comments (4)

[Theorem 4.3, §4.1] The proof asserts that ∫ P(s,(x,δ_x),t,·)π_s(dx) × δ_{π_s}(dδ_x) is the MVSDE distribution at time t with initial distribution π_s. This is false. For each fixed x, P(s,(x,δ_x),t,·) is the law of (X_t^{s,x}, L_{X_t^{s,x}}), where L_{X_t^{s,x}} is the marginal of the point-start MVSDE, not the common mean-field law μ_t^{s,π_s} of the flow started from π_s. Averaging these kernels over x ∼ π_s gives a mixture of point-start flows, whereas the MVSDE flow from initial law π_s is generated by a single common law μ_t. The correct kernel would be P(s,(x,π_s),t,·), with the second coordinate fixed to π_s. Moreover, the paper never proves that the periodic lifted measure P0 is supported on the consistent set {ν(dy)δ_ν(dμ)}: Lemma 4.1 starts from an arbitrary (x0,μ0), and a weak limit of Cesàro averages need not be diagonal. Without consistency, the marginal π_t does not evolve under the nonlinear semigroup. This gap is load-bearing for the paper's central claim; it is likely repairable, for example by starting the Krylov–Bogoliubov construction from (x0,δ_{x0}) and observing that the diagonal is closed under the lift, but that argument is absent.
[Lemma 4.1, eq. (4.10)] The verification of condition (3.4) of Theorem 3.10 is incomplete. Inequality (4.10) gives, for each initial (x,μ), P(s,(x,μ),t,U_R^c) ≤ (V(s,x,μ)+λ(t-s))/V_R. To obtain (3.4), one needs the supremum over (x,μ) ∈ U_{β(R)} of this ratio to vanish as R → ∞. Condition (H) only states V_R → ∞; it gives no control on sup_{U_{β(R)}} V(s,x,μ) relative to V_R, and P_2 balls are not compact in W_2, so the required uniformity is not automatic. As a result, Lemma 4.1's application of Theorem 3.10 is not justified.
[Paragraph after (4.6), Lemma 4.1, Theorem 4.3] The paper makes 'regular solution' an assumption without stating sufficient conditions. The text says, 'for simplicity we do not introduce the conditions in [19], and directly define that the solutions ... is called regular.' Since Theorems 4.3, 4.7, and 4.8 all inherit this assumption, the results are conditional on an unverified hypothesis. In particular, Examples 5.1–5.3 check only the Lyapunov condition; they do not verify existence of unique regular solutions for the exhibited non-Lipschitz coefficients. The revision should either state the regularity conditions explicitly or cite them in a way that makes the hypotheses of the main theorems checkable.
[Theorem 4.8 and Remark 4.9, §4.3] The result stated in Theorem 4.8 is only tightness of the family {L_{X_{k,t}}}, not the continuous dependence on parameters claimed in the abstract and introduction. Remark 4.9 explicitly leaves the convergence ν_t = L_{X_t} to a condition deferred to reference [21]. Thus the section does not prove the announced continuous-dependence result. Either the statement should be weakened to a tightness result, or the missing growth conditions from [21] should be stated and verified.

minor comments (5)

[Lemma 4.6] Lemma 4.6 refers to 'conditions of Theorem 4.1', but no Theorem 4.1 exists in the paper; it should refer to Lemma 4.1.
[Theorem 3.13 proof] In the proof of Theorem 3.13 the text says 'We next prove equality (4.11)', but equation (4.11) is introduced later in Section 4.2; the reference should be to (3.5).
[Section 3, U_R notation] The set U_R is used in Theorem 3.10 and Corollary 3.11, but only U_R^c is defined, in Theorem 3.9; the notation should be defined explicitly where it first appears.
[Theorem 3.10 proof] In the first part of the proof of Theorem 3.10, the sentence 'by limits (3.2) and (3.3)' appears to be a typo; the argument uses limits (3.3) and (3.4) to derive (3.2).
[Section 4.1, before (4.1)] There is a typo in 'coupled McKean-Vlaosv SDEs'; it should be 'McKean-Vlasov'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: assumptions and Lyapunov conditions are genuine inputs, and self-citations are not load-bearing; the projection gap in Theorem 4.3 is a correctness issue, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper contains no circular reduction. Lemma 4.1 assumes condition (H) and the existence of unique regular solutions; regularity is explicitly defined in the text ('for simplicity we do not introduce the conditions in [19], and directly define that the solutions of equations (4.1) is called regular...') rather than being imported as a conclusion from the author's prior work. The T-periodic probability for the lifted semigroup is then obtained from Itô's formula, the Lyapunov condition, and Krylov-Bogolioubov, with no fitted parameter or pre-supposed periodic solution. Self-citations [19] and [21] are not load-bearing: [19] is background for the truncation construction and the regularity assumption is stated directly, while [21] appears only in Remark 4.9 as a pointer for growth conditions. The real defect is in the proof of Theorem 4.3, where the sentence '∫ P(s,(x,δ_x),t,·)π_s(dx) × δ_{π_s}(dδ_x) is the above MVSDE's distribution at time t with initial distribution π_s × δ_{π_s}' asserts exactly the nonlinear propagation property that needs proof; for a general lift of π_s the kernel should start from (x,π_s), not (x,δ_x). This is an unproved consistency assertion and a correctness gap, but it is not an equivalence by construction, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and not a conclusion forced by self-citation. Under the stated circularity criteria, it therefore does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted. The paper's main theorem depends on an unstated regularity assumption and on standard results imported from cited literature. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)

standard math Standard Ito formula and Lions derivative calculus on P2(R^d) are valid.
Used throughout Section 4, e.g. equation (4.7) and the definition of L V in condition (H).
domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of solutions for MVSDEs under Lipschitz and linear growth conditions from [30, Theorem 2.1].
Invoked in Section 4.1 to obtain X^n from truncated coefficients.
ad hoc to paper The coupled MVSDEs (4.1) have unique regular solutions for at least one initial condition, where regularity includes tau_n to infinity and convergence of laws of stopped processes.
Assumed directly in Lemma 4.1; sufficient conditions from [19] are not stated.
standard math Krylov-Bogolioubov theorem applies on the lifted space R^d times P(R^d) because the transition semigroup is linear and Feller.
Used in Theorem 3.9 and Corollary 3.11.
standard math Tightness on P(R^d) is characterized by W2-compactness and uniform moment controls as in Proposition 2.1.
Used in Theorems 3.9, 3.13 and 4.8.
domain assumption Condition (H) implies the generator L V is bounded above and that the Chebyshev-type inequality (4.10) is valid.
Used in Lemma 4.1 to deduce limits (3.3) and (3.4).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Periodic solutions for McKean-Vlasov SDEs under periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AICZYTDZ

@misc{pith2026250115416,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Periodic solutions for McKean-Vlasov SDEs under periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AICZYTDZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15416}
}

abstract

In this paper, we prove the existence of periodic solutions for McKean-Vlasov SDEs under periodic distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions, which is obtained by periodic Markov processes with state space $\mathbb R^d\times \mathcal P(\mathbb R^d)$. Here $\mathcal P(\mathbb R^d)$ denotes the space of probability measures on $\mathbb R^d$. In addition, we show the convergence to the periodic solution and the continuous dependence on parameters of periodic solutions for McKean-Vlasov SDEs. Finally, we provide several examples to illustrate our theoretical results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

[21]

Ma and Z

J. Ma and Z. Liu, Continuous dependence for McKean-Vlas ov SDEs under distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions, To appear in Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S (2025+), 20pp

work page 2025
[19]

Existence, uniqueness and ergodicity for McKean-Vlasov SDEs under distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions

Z. Liu and J. Ma, Existence, uniqueness and ergodicity f or McKean-Vlasov SDEs under distribution- dependent Lyapunov conditions, arXiv preprint (2023), arXiv:2309.05411

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[1]

Bogachev, M

V.I. Bogachev, M. R¨ ockner and S.V. Shaposhnikov, Convergence in variation of solutions of nonlinear Fokker- Planck-Kolmogorov equations to stationary measures, J. Funct. Anal. 276 (2019), 3681–3713

work page 2019
[2]

Buckdahn, J

R. Buckdahn, J. Li and S. Peng, Mean-ﬁeld backward stocha stic diﬀerential equations and related partial diﬀerential equations, Stochastic Process. Appl. 119 (2009), 3133–3154

work page 2009
[3]

Buckdahn, J

R. Buckdahn, J. Li, S. Peng and C. Rainer, Mean-ﬁeld stoch astic diﬀerential equations and associated PDEs, Ann. Probab. 45 (2017), 824–878

work page 2017
[4]

Butkovsky, On ergodic properties of nonlinear Mark ov chains and stochastic McKean-Vlasov equations, Theory Probab

O.A. Butkovsky, On ergodic properties of nonlinear Mark ov chains and stochastic McKean-Vlasov equations, Theory Probab. Appl. 58 (2014), 661–674

work page 2014
[5]

Cheban and Z

D. Cheban and Z. Liu, Periodic, quasi-periodic, almost p eriodic, almost automorphic, Birkhoﬀ recurrent and Poisson stable solutions for stochastic diﬀerential equat ions, J. Diﬀerential Equations 269 (2020), 3652–3685

work page 2020
[6]

F. Chen, Y. Han, Y. Li and X. Yang, Periodic solutions of Fo kker-Planck equations, J. Diﬀerential Equations 263 (2017), 285–298

work page 2017

Show all 31 references

[7]

Chen, From Markov Chains to Non-equilibrium Particle Systems , World Scientiﬁc Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 2004, xii+597 pp

M.F. Chen, From Markov Chains to Non-equilibrium Particle Systems , World Scientiﬁc Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 2004, xii+597 pp

2004
[8]

Ding and H

X. Ding and H. Qiao, Euler-Maruyama approximations for s tochastic McKean-Vlasov equations with non- Lipschitz coeﬃcients, J. Theoret. Probab. 34 (2021), 1408–1425

2021
[9]

Hong, S.S

W. Hong, S.S. Hu and W. Liu, McKean-Vlasov SDEs and SPDEs w ith locally monotone coeﬃcients, Ann. Appl. Probab.34 (2024), 2136–2189. PERIOD SOLUTIONS FOR MVSDES 19

2024
[10]

Huang, R.P

M. Huang, R.P. Malham´ e and P.E. Caines, Large population stochastic dynamic games: closed-loop McKean- Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principl e, Commun. Inf. Syst. 6 (2006), 221–251

2006
[11]

Huang, R.P

M. Huang, R.P. Malham´ e and P.E. Caines, Large-populat ion cost-coupled LQG problems with nonuniform agents: individual-mass behavior and decentralized ǫ-Nash equilibria, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 52 (2007), 1560–1571

2007
[12]

M. Ji, W. Qi, Z. Shen and Y. Yi, Existence of periodic prob ability solutions to Fokker-Planck equations with applications, J. Funct. Anal. 277 (2019), 41pp

2019
[13]

M. Ji, W. Qi, Z. Shen and Y. Yi, Noise-vanishing concentr ation and limit behaviors of periodic probability solutions, Diﬀerential Integral Equations 33 (2020), 273–322

2020
[14]

M. Ji, W. Qi, Z. Shen and Y. Yi, Convergence to periodic pr obability solutions in Fokker-Planck equations SIAM J. Math. Anal. 53 (2021), 1958–1992

2021
[15]

Khasminskii, Stochastic Stability of Diﬀerential Equations , Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, xvi+344 pp

R. Khasminskii, Stochastic Stability of Diﬀerential Equations , Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, xvi+344 pp

2012
[16]

Lasry and P.L

J.M. Lasry and P.L. Lions, Jeux ` a champ moyen. I. Le cas s tationnaire. (French) [Mean ﬁeld games. I. The stationary case], C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343 (2006), 619–625

2006
[17]

Lasry and P.L

J.M. Lasry and P.L. Lions, Jeux ` a champ moyen. II. Horiz on ﬁni et controle optimal. (French) [Mean ﬁeld games. II. Finite horizon and optimal control], C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343 (2006), 679–684

2006
[18]

Lasry and P.L

J.M. Lasry and P.L. Lions, Mean ﬁeld games, Jpn. J. Math. 2 (2007), 229–260

2007
[20]

Liu and D

Z. Liu and D. Lu, Ergodicity of inhomogeneous Markov pro cesses under general criteria, To appear in Front. Math. (2025+), 28pp

2025
[22]

McKean, Propagation of chaos for a class of nonline ar parabolic equations

H.P. McKean, Propagation of chaos for a class of nonline ar parabolic equations. In: Lecture Series in Diﬀer- ential Equations, 7 (1967), 41–57

1967
[23]

Prokhorov, Convergence of random processes and l imit theorems in probability theory, Theory Probab

Yu.V. Prokhorov, Convergence of random processes and l imit theorems in probability theory, Theory Probab. Appl. 1 (1956), 157–214

1956
[24]

P. Ren, H. Tang and F.Y. Wang, Distribution-path depend ent nonlinear SPDEs with application to stochastic transport type equations, Potential Anal. 61 (2024), 379–407

2024
[25]

Ren, K.T

P. Ren, K.T. Sturm and F.Y. Wang, Exponential ergodicit y for time-periodic McKean-Vlasov SDEs, arXiv preprint (2021), arXiv:2110.06473

2021 arXiv
[26]

Revuz and M

D. Revuz and M. Yor, Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. xiv+602 pp

1999
[27]

Sun and E

W. Sun and E. Wong, Existence of Periodic and Stationary Solutions to Distribution-Dependent SDEs, arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2501.09176

2025 arXiv
[28]

A. S. Sznitman, Nonlinear reﬂecting diﬀusion process, and the propagation of chaos and ﬂuctuations associ- ated, J. Funct. Anal. 56 (1984), 311–336

1984
[29]

Villani, Optimal Transport

C. Villani, Optimal Transport. Old and New , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009, xxii+973 pp

2009
[30]

Wang, Distribution dependent SDEs for Landau type equations, Stochastic Process

F.Y. Wang, Distribution dependent SDEs for Landau type equations, Stochastic Process. Appl. 128 (2018), 595–621

2018
[31]

X. Zhou, J. Xing, X. Jiang and Y. Li, Periodic solutions i n distribution of mean-ﬁeld stochastic diﬀerential equations, J. Stat. Phys. 190 (2023), 34 pp. J. Ma: School of Mathematics and Statistics and Center for Ma thematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Northeast Normal U...

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [21]

Ma and Z

J. Ma and Z. Liu, Continuous dependence for McKean-Vlas ov SDEs under distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions, To appear in Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S (2025+), 20pp

work page 2025

[2] [19]

Existence, uniqueness and ergodicity for McKean-Vlasov SDEs under distribution-dependent Lyapunov conditions

Z. Liu and J. Ma, Existence, uniqueness and ergodicity f or McKean-Vlasov SDEs under distribution- dependent Lyapunov conditions, arXiv preprint (2023), arXiv:2309.05411

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[3] [1]

Bogachev, M

V.I. Bogachev, M. R¨ ockner and S.V. Shaposhnikov, Convergence in variation of solutions of nonlinear Fokker- Planck-Kolmogorov equations to stationary measures, J. Funct. Anal. 276 (2019), 3681–3713

work page 2019

[4] [2]

Buckdahn, J

R. Buckdahn, J. Li and S. Peng, Mean-ﬁeld backward stocha stic diﬀerential equations and related partial diﬀerential equations, Stochastic Process. Appl. 119 (2009), 3133–3154

work page 2009

[5] [3]

Buckdahn, J

R. Buckdahn, J. Li, S. Peng and C. Rainer, Mean-ﬁeld stoch astic diﬀerential equations and associated PDEs, Ann. Probab. 45 (2017), 824–878

work page 2017

[6] [4]

Butkovsky, On ergodic properties of nonlinear Mark ov chains and stochastic McKean-Vlasov equations, Theory Probab

O.A. Butkovsky, On ergodic properties of nonlinear Mark ov chains and stochastic McKean-Vlasov equations, Theory Probab. Appl. 58 (2014), 661–674

work page 2014

[7] [5]

Cheban and Z

D. Cheban and Z. Liu, Periodic, quasi-periodic, almost p eriodic, almost automorphic, Birkhoﬀ recurrent and Poisson stable solutions for stochastic diﬀerential equat ions, J. Diﬀerential Equations 269 (2020), 3652–3685

work page 2020

[8] [6]

F. Chen, Y. Han, Y. Li and X. Yang, Periodic solutions of Fo kker-Planck equations, J. Diﬀerential Equations 263 (2017), 285–298

work page 2017