Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hybrid Computing for Interactive Datacenter Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.04488 v1 pith:AIPKEBBB submitted 2023-04-10 cs.DC

classification cs.DC
keywords energycostefficiencyfpgassporkhybridcpusefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are more energy efficient and cost effective than CPUs for a wide variety of datacenter applications. Yet, for latency-sensitive and bursty workloads, this advantage can be difficult to harness due to high FPGA spin-up costs. We propose that a hybrid FPGA and CPU computing framework can harness the energy efficiency benefits of FPGAs for such workloads at reasonable cost. Our key insight is to use FPGAs for stable-state workload and CPUs for short-term workload bursts. Using this insight, we design Spork, a lightweight hybrid scheduler that can realize these energy efficiency and cost benefits in practice. Depending on the desired objective, Spork can trade off energy efficiency for cost reduction and vice versa. It is parameterized with key differences between FPGAs and CPUs in terms of power draw, performance, cost, and spin-up latency. We vary this parameter space and analyze various application and worker configurations on production and synthetic traces. Our evaluation of cloud workloads shows that energy-optimized Spork is not only more energy efficient but it is also cheaper than homogeneous platforms--for short application requests with tight deadlines, it is 1.53x more energy efficient and 2.14x cheaper than using only FPGAs. Relative to an idealized version of an existing cost-optimized hybrid scheduler, energy-optimized Spork provides 1.2-2.4x higher energy efficiency at comparable cost, while cost-optimized Spork provides 1.1-2x higher energy efficiency at 1.06-1.2x lower cost.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools