Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Floquet-Weyl states at one-photon resonances in three-dimensional topological insulators

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Circular light creates Weyl points in Bi₂Se₃ at one-photon resonance

desk verdict Solid Floquet-Weyl topology in Bi2Se3; the AHC peak claim leans on a sudden approximation that may not survive dissipation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07199 v1 pith:AJATEMXE submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.str-el

Keiya Uehara , Ryo Okugawa , Takami Tohyama , Shun Okumura This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 71.70.Ej73.43.-f78.20.Bh
keywords FloquetengineeringWeylsemimetaltopologicalinsulatorBi₂Se₃anomalousHalleffectcircularlypolarizedlightone-photonresonanceBerrycurvature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that shining circularly polarized light on the three-dimensional topological insulator Bi₂Se₃, at a photon energy tuned to a one-photon resonance between the valence and conduction bands, creates four pairs of Weyl points — gapless band crossings that act as monopoles of Berry curvature in momentum space. The mechanism is the resonant hybridization between the original valence band and a photon-shifted copy of the conduction band, which occurs at an intermediate driving frequency too low for the usual high-frequency approximation to apply. Because Bi₂Se₃ has threefold rotational symmetry (C₃z), the Weyl points do not appear as simple double-Weyl nodes (as they would in an isotropic continuum model) but instead split into a characteristic pattern: one node with topological charge −1 on the rotation axis and three nodes with charge +1 arranged around it, in each half of the Brillouin zone. The authors construct a topological phase diagram showing gapped, Floquet-Weyl, and Floquet-Chern regimes as the light field and photon energy are varied. They further calculate the anomalous Hall conductivity and show that when the chemical potential is shifted by hole doping to the resonant quasienergy (approximately minus half the photon energy), a sharp peak in the Hall conductivity appears, directly attributable to the emergent Weyl points. This peak is absent in the high-frequency expansion, confirming its resonant origin.

What carries the argument

The one-photon-resonant Floquet Hamiltonian (Eq. 3), an 8×8 matrix coupling the 0-photon and −1-photon sectors; the effective 2×2 Hamiltonian (Eq. 4) obtained by projecting onto the two degenerate resonant states, whose off-diagonal terms contain both quadratic (q²₋) and linear (q±) in-plane momentum dependence, with the latter being symmetry-allowed by C₃z and responsible for splitting the double-Weyl point; the topological phase diagram in the (E₀, Ω) plane; and the Kubo formula for anomalous Hall conductivity with a sudden-approximation distribution function.

What would settle it

If the anomalous Hall conductivity peak at μ ≈ −Ω/2 is absent or uncorrelated with the Weyl-point quasienergy in hole-doped Bi₂Se₃ under resonant circularly polarized light, the claim that resonant Weyl points produce a directly observable transport signal would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the crystalline C₃z symmetry of Bi₂Se₃ imprints a distinctive threefold splitting pattern on Floquet-Weyl points created at one-photon resonance: instead of the double-Weyl nodes (charge ±2) predicted by isotropic continuum models, the lattice model produces one node of charge −1 on the rotation axis and three nodes of charge +1 around it, per half of the Brillouin zone, totaling four pairs. This splitting is driven by linear-in-momentum terms (λ₁τ q±) in the effective two-band Hamiltonian, which are forbidden by continuous rotational symmetry but allowed by threefold crystal symmetry. The authors show that this resonant mechanism — distinct from off-resonant, H

Load-bearing premise

The sudden approximation for the nonequilibrium electron distribution assumes that Floquet eigenstates are populated according to their overlap with equilibrium eigenstates, without accounting for relaxation, heating, or coupling to reservoirs. This determines the predicted anomalous Hall conductivity values and the sharpness of the doping-induced peak, which real experiments — with dephasing and dissipation — could smear or shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hole-doped Bi₂Se₃ (already achieved experimentally via Ca substitution, shifting the Fermi level by ~0.3–0.4 eV) could serve as a direct platform for observing one-photon-resonant Floquet-Weyl physics through anomalous Hall measurements.
  • The photon energy controls the quasienergy of the Weyl points, so different resonant topological states can be probed within a single material by simply changing the laser frequency.
  • The symmetry-adapted splitting mechanism generalizes to other spin–orbit-coupled materials with different point-group symmetries, potentially producing Floquet topological defects with non-standard charge configurations.
  • Fermi-arc surface states connecting the surface projections of the resonant Weyl points are a natural experimental target for angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy.
  • Replica-replica hybridization (between different Floquet-replica bands, not just original-replica) could provide additional Floquet-Weyl phases with more direct experimental signatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The threefold splitting pattern is a direct crystallographic fingerprint: observing four pairs of Weyl points with the predicted 1:3 arrangement in momentum space would confirm that the resonant mechanism, rather than off-resonant band deformation, is operative.
  • The sign reversal of the anomalous Hall conductivity around E₀ ≈ 6 MV/cm, driven by Berry-curvature redistribution as the parent TI gap narrows, could serve as an independent diagnostic of the crossover from off-resonant to resonant regimes.
  • If dissipation and heating are strong enough to thermalize the distribution function away from the sudden approximation, the sharp AHC peak at μ ≈ −Ω/2 could broaden significantly, but the underlying Weyl-point topology in the Floquet band structure would persist — the band topology is a property of the Hamiltonian, not the distribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript investigates Floquet-Weyl point generation in Bi2Se3-type three-dimensional topological insulators driven by circularly polarized light at one-photon resonance. The authors show that four pairs of Floquet-Weyl points emerge in the intermediate-frequency regime through hybridization between the original valence and photon-shifted conduction bands, with a characteristic threefold splitting pattern reflecting the C3z crystalline symmetry. They construct a topological phase diagram (gapped, Floquet-Weyl, Floquet-Chern states), derive an effective two-band Hamiltonian whose Weyl-point positions are determined analytically, and calculate the photo-induced anomalous Hall conductivity, showing that hole doping to mu ~ -Omega/2 yields a sharp peak associated with the Weyl points.

Significance. The work extends one-photon-resonant Floquet-Weyl physics from 3D Dirac semimetals (Hirai et al., Ref. 39) to spin-orbit-coupled topological insulators, which is a meaningful broadening of the mechanism. The analytical derivation of the effective two-band Hamiltonian (Eq. 4, Appendix C) is a genuine strength: the Weyl-point positions (Eqs. 6-8) follow from the lattice symmetry and Floquet Hamiltonian structure without fitting to the target result, and the threefold splitting pattern is a falsifiable, symmetry-dictated prediction distinct from the isotropic continuum double-Weyl result. The identification of hole doping as a practical route to expose the Weyl-point contribution to the AHC is a concrete, experimentally testable proposal, especially given that Ca substitution in Bi2Se3 can shift the Fermi level by ~0.3-0.4 eV (Ref. 55). The comparison with the high-frequency expansion (Appendix B) to disentangle resonant from off-resonant contributions is also valuable.

major comments (2)
  1. The AHC results (Figs. 5-6) and the claim of a 'sharp peak' at mu ~ -Omega/2 depend on the sudden approximation for the nonequilibrium distribution function f_n (Eq. 11), which populates Floquet eigenstates according to their overlap with equilibrium eigenstates without relaxation, dephasing, or reservoir coupling. The paper acknowledges this limitation qualitatively (citing Refs. 20-22) but does not quantify how robust the peak is to any finite scattering rate. Since the peak's sharpness relative to the broad HFE background (Fig. 7) is what makes it experimentally distinguishable, this is load-bearing for the transport claim. The authors should either (i) estimate the scattering timescales in Bi2Se3 and argue that the Floquet steady state is reached before significant relaxation, or (ii) show, even at a crude level (e.g., a phenomenological broadening parameter in the Kubo formula), how
  2. The topological phase diagram in Fig. 4(a) shows three regions, but the criteria for the boundaries between the gapped, Floquet-Weyl, and Floquet-Chern states are described only qualitatively in the text (Sec. III C). The boundary between the Floquet-Weyl and Floquet-Chern states is stated to occur when Weyl points 'reach the BZ boundary and pair-annihilate,' but it is unclear whether this is determined by the Weyl points reaching a specific high-symmetry plane (e.g., the Z point) or by a Lifshitz-type transition. A more precise definition of the phase boundaries, ideally with the critical Omega or E0 values for the representative cuts in Figs. 4(b,c), would strengthen the phase diagram's utility.
minor comments (5)
  1. In Fig. 4(a), the color scale for Delta_k_z appears to saturate at the BZ boundary, but the distinction between Delta_k_z = 2*pi/c (Floquet-Chern) and Delta_k_z = 0 (gapped) is not visually clear in the dark-colored gapped region. A different colormap or an inset magnifying the small-Delta_k_z region would help.
  2. The sign reversal of sigma_xy around E0 ~ 6 MV/cm (Sec. IV A) is attributed to the competition between positive off-resonant and negative resonant Berry-curvature contributions, but the physical origin of the negative sign of the resonant contribution is not explained. A brief comment on why the Berry curvature near the reduced gap is negative would improve the discussion.
  3. In Eq. (11), the sum over alpha runs over the 0-photon bands in equilibrium, but the temperature T and chemical potential mu appear in the Fermi-Dirac factor. The text states T=0 and mu=0 for Fig. 5, but for Fig. 6 (mu dependence), it should be clarified whether the distribution function is re-evaluated at each mu or whether mu enters only the Kubo formula (Eq. 9) via the Berry curvature integral.
  4. The phrase 'intermediate-frequency regime' is used throughout (e.g., abstract, Sec. III) without a precise definition relative to the band gap. A brief statement of the frequency range (e.g., Omega comparable to the gap) would help readers from the Floquet literature.
  5. Reference [25] appears to have incomplete publication details (Nat. Mater., page numbers listed as '1'). Please update with final publication information if available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Weyl-point derivation is parameter-free given the tight-binding model, and the AHC peak position at μ ≈ −Ω/2 follows from the band structure, not from a fit to the target result.

full rationale

The paper's central topological claim — the emergence of four pairs of Floquet-Weyl points with a C₃z-symmetric splitting pattern (one −1 and three +1 nodes per half-BZ) — is derived analytically from the effective two-band Hamiltonian (Eq. 4, derived in Appendix C via canonical transformation) and the Weyl-point positions (Eqs. 6–8). These equations follow directly from the lattice symmetry and the Floquet Hamiltonian structure; no parameter is fitted to the Weyl-point outcome. The tight-binding parameters (Table I) are fitted to ab-initio data for Bi₂Se₃, not to the Floquet-Weyl result. The AHC peak at μ ≈ −Ω/2 is a prediction of the band structure (the Weyl points sit at quasienergy −Ω/2 by construction of the one-photon resonance), not a fitted quantity. The sudden approximation (Eq. 11) for the nonequilibrium distribution is a modeling assumption with known limitations (acknowledged via Refs. 20–22), but it is not circular: it does not define the distribution in terms of the AHC result it aims to predict. The self-citation to Hirai et al. (Ref. 39) introduces the one-photon resonance mechanism for 3D Dirac electrons, but the present paper's extension to the Bi₂Se₃ lattice model and the C₃z splitting pattern is independently derived. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The Floquet-Weyl points are emergent features of the driven band structure, not new particles or forces. All free parameters are tight-binding model inputs fitted to ab-initio data, not to the paper's own results. The axioms are standard Floquet theory assumptions, with the sudden approximation being the most fragile.

free parameters (3)
  • A₀, B₀, A₁₁, B₁₁, A₁₂, B₁₂, A₁₄, B₁₄, m₁₁ = see Table I (eV units)
    Tight-binding hopping parameters fitted to ab-initio band structure of Bi₂Se₃ via WannierTools. These are inputs from prior literature (Mao et al. [46]) and are not fitted to the Floquet-Weyl result.
  • E_F = 0.0676 eV
    Fermi energy fitted to ab-initio data, not to the Floquet result.
  • Ω, E₀ = varied in phase diagram (Ω: 0.3–0.8 eV, E₀: 0–12 MV/cm)
    Driving parameters scanned over, not fitted. Representative values Ω=0.6 eV, E₀=2.4 MV/cm used for detailed analysis.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Floquet theorem applies to the periodically driven Hamiltonian
    Standard mathematical framework; invoked in Sec. II B when constructing H_F in Eq. (2).
  • domain assumption One-photon approximation: truncation of the Floquet Hamiltonian to 0- and −1-photon sectors (8×8 matrix)
    Sec. II B, Eq. (3). Justified by focusing on the resonant hybridization, but higher-photon sectors are neglected. Validity depends on Ω being comparable to but not too small relative to the gap.
  • domain assumption Sudden approximation for nonequilibrium distribution function f_n
    Eq. (11) in Sec. IV A. Assumes Floquet states are populated by projecting equilibrium eigenstates without relaxation. Standard in Floquet literature but uncontrolled for quantitative AHC.
  • domain assumption Peierls substitution k → k + A(t) captures the light-matter coupling
    Sec. II B. Standard for non-interacting tight-binding models under electromagnetic fields, neglecting interband dipole matrix elements beyond the minimal coupling.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Floquet-Weyl states at one-photon resonances in three-dimensional topological insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AJATEMXE

@misc{pith2026260707199,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Floquet-Weyl states at one-photon resonances in three-dimensional topological insulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AJATEMXE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07199}
}
abstract

Quantum materials exhibit exotic phases and electronic responses under irradiation by circularly polarized light, which breaks time-reversal symmetry and generates Floquet replica bands. Recently, Floquet topological states arising from direct resonances have attracted much attention, e.g., the emergence of Floquet-Weyl points at a one-photon resonance, rather than topological features within the modulated original bands via high-frequency expansion. In this study, we investigate the effects of a one-photon resonance in a representative three-dimensional topological insulator, Bi$_2$Se$_3$, applying Floquet theory under circularly polarized light. We find that four pairs of Floquet-Weyl points emerge in the intermediate-frequency regime, mediated by hybridization between the original and one-photon-resonant Floquet bands, preserving the threefold rotational symmetry of the crystalline structure. Our numerical calculations demonstrate that tuning the chemical potential via hole doping yields a large anomalous Hall conductivity, directly associated with these Floquet-Weyl points. This work provides a highly accessible route toward the experimental realization of one-photon-resonant Floquet-Weyl semimetals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07199 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematics of (a) the crystal structure of Bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Energy dispersion obtained from (a)(b) the one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Band structures of Bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Topological phase diagram for the photon en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows σxy as a function of the chemical po￾FIG. 6. Chemical potential µ dependence of the anomalous Hall conductivity σxy calculated by the one-photon-resonant model at Ω = 0.6 eV for several electric fields E0. tential µ for a fixed photon energy Ω = 0.6 eV. A pro￾nou…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Color plot of the anomalous Hall conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) shows the chemical-potential dependence of the AHC calculated from Eq. (B1), in the same parame￾ter setting as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The components of the Bloch Hamiltonian in Eq

    In the numerical calculations throughout this work, we set the lattice constants toa= 4.076 ˚A andc= 9.943 ˚A. The components of the Bloch Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) are decomposedh i(k) =P3 l=1 hil(k) with h0l(k) = 2A0 cosk al + 2B0 cosk bl , h1l(k) = 2A14 sinϕ l sink al + 2B14 cosϕ l sink bl , h2l(k) =−2B 14 sinϕ l sink bl −2A 14 cosϕ l sink al , h3l(k) = 2...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We expand the Hamiltonian in Eq

    Resonance points We investigate resonance points near the Γ point. We expand the Hamiltonian in Eq. (3) up to the first order in A, and treatH 1 andH −1 perturbatively below. Before the perturbation is included, the Hamiltonian reduces to Heff ≃ H(k) 0 0H(k)−Ω .(C1) Its eigenvalues are given by h0(k)±d(k), h 0(k)±d(k)−Ω,(C2) where d(k) := vuut 5X i=1 hi(k...

    work page

  3. [3]

    To this end, we expand the Hamiltonian around the resonance momentumk τ while using the eigenbasis ofH eff(kτ)

    Construction of the effective Hamiltonian We derive the 2×2 effective Hamiltonian for the two resonant states|v,↑,0⟩and|c,↓,−1⟩to describe the emergent Floquet-Weyl points. To this end, we expand the Hamiltonian around the resonance momentumk τ while using the eigenbasis ofH eff(kτ). We take the fol- lowing ordered basis: 11 {|v,↑,0⟩,|c,↓,−1⟩,|v,↓,0⟩,|c,↑...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Univer- sal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven sys- tems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineer- ing, Adv. Phys.64, 139 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, Towards prop- erties on demand in quantum materials, Nat. Mater.16, 1077 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet Engineering of Quan- tum Materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 387 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topo- logical insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 229 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Magnus, On the exponential solution of differential equations for a linear operator, Commun

    W. Magnus, On the exponential solution of differential equations for a linear operator, Commun. Pure Appl. Math.7, 649 (1954)

    1954

  2. [10]

    Blanes, F

    S. Blanes, F. Casas, J. A. Oteo, and J. Ros, The Magnus expansion and some of its applications, Phys. Rep.470, 151 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    Goldman and J

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically Driven Quan- tum Systems: Effective Hamiltonians and Engineered Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Eckardt and E

    A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, High-frequency approx- imation for periodically driven quantum systems from a Floquet-space perspective, New J. Phys.17, 093039 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Mikami, S

    T. Mikami, S. Kitamura, K. Yasuda, N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Brillouin-Wigner theory for high-frequency expansion in periodically driven systems: Application to Floquet topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B93, 144307 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    Kitagawa, T

    T. Kitagawa, T. Oka, A. Brataas, L. Fu, and E. Demler, Transport properties of nonequilibrium systems under the application of light: Photoinduced quantum Hall in- sulators without Landau levels, Phys. Rev. B84, 235108 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and V. Galitski, Floquet topo- logical insulator in semiconductor quantum wells, Nat. Phys.7, 490 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Sza- meit, Photonic Floquet topological insulators, Nature 496, 196 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Jotzu, M

    G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultra- cold fermions, Nature515, 237 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Claassen, A. F. Kemper, B. Moritz, T. Oka, J. K. Freericks, and T. P. Devereaux, Theory of Floquet band formation and local pseudospin textures in pump-probe photoemission of graphene, Nat. Commun. 6, 7047 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    Iadecola, T

    T. Iadecola, T. Neupert, and C. Chamon, Topological gaps without masses in driven graphene-like systems, Phys. Rev. B89, 115425 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Kundu, H

    A. Kundu, H. A. Fertig, and B. Seradjeh, Effective The- ory of Floquet Topological Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 236803 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    P. M. Perez-Piskunow, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, and L. E. F. F. Torres, Floquet chiral edge states in graphene, Phys. Rev. B89, 121401 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    K. I. Seetharam, C.-E. Bardyn, N. H. Lindner, M. S. Rudner, and G. Refael, Controlled Population of Floquet- Bloch States via Coupling to Bose and Fermi Baths, Phys. Rev. X5, 041050 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Dehghani, T

    H. Dehghani, T. Oka, and A. Mitra, Out-of-equilibrium electrons and the Hall conductance of a Floquet topolog- ical insulator, Phys. Rev. B91, 155422 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    S. A. Sato, J. W. McIver, M. Nuske, P. Tang, G. Jotzu, B. Schulte, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, L. Mathey, M. A. Sentef, A. Cavalleri, and A. Rubio, Microscopic theory for the light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 214302 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Nat. Phys.16, 38 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Merboldt, M

    M. Merboldt, M. Sch¨ uler, D. Schmitt, J. P. Bange, W. Bennecke, K. Gadge, K. Pierz, H. W. Schumacher, D. Momeni, D. Steil, S. R. Manmana, M. A. Sentef, M. Reutzel, and S. Mathias, Observation of Floquet states in graphene, Nat. Phys.21, 1093 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    F. Wang, X. Cai, X. Tang, J. Lu, W. Chen, T. Sheng, R. Feng, H. Zhong, H. Zhang, P. Yu, and S. Zhou, Obser- vation of Floquet-induced gap in graphene, Nat. Mater. , 1 (2026), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02549-y

    2026 doi

  21. [29]

    Narayan, Floquet dynamics in two-dimensional semi- Dirac semimetals and three-dimensional Dirac semimet- als, Phys

    A. Narayan, Floquet dynamics in two-dimensional semi- Dirac semimetals and three-dimensional Dirac semimet- als, Phys. Rev. B91, 205445 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Ebihara, K

    S. Ebihara, K. Fukushima, and T. Oka, Chiral pumping effect induced by rotating electric fields, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155107 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    H¨ ubener, M

    H. H¨ ubener, M. A. Sentef, U. De Giovannini, A. F. Kemper, and A. Rubio, Creating stable Floquet–Weyl semimetals by laser-driving of 3D Dirac materials, Nat. Commun.8, 13940 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    C.-K. Chan, P. A. Lee, K. S. Burch, J. H. Han, and Y. Ran, When Chiral Photons Meet Chiral Fermions: Photoinduced Anomalous Hall Effects in Weyl Semimet- als, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 026805 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Taguchi, T

    K. Taguchi, T. Imaeda, M. Sato, and Y. Tanaka, Photo- voltaic chiral magnetic effect in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B93, 201202 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Yan and Z

    Z. Yan and Z. Wang, Tunable Weyl Points in Periodically Driven Nodal Line Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 087402 (2016). 14

    2016

  27. [35]

    Chan, Y.-T

    C.-K. Chan, Y.-T. Oh, J. H. Han, and P. A. Lee, Type-II Weyl cone transitions in driven semimetals, Phys. Rev. B94, 121106(R) (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    R. Chen, B. Zhou, and D.-H. Xu, Floquet Weyl semimet- als in light-irradiated type-II and hybrid line-node semimetals, Phys. Rev. B97, 155152 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Zhang, T

    X.-X. Zhang, T. T. Ong, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of pho- toinduced Floquet Weyl semimetal phases, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235137 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Murotani, N

    Y. Murotani, N. Kanda, T. Fujimoto, T. Matsuda, M. Goyal, J. Yoshinobu, Y. Kobayashi, T. Oka, S. Stem- mer, and R. Matsunaga, Disentangling the Competing Mechanisms of Light-Induced Anomalous Hall Conduc- tivity in Three-Dimensional Dirac Semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 096901 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Yoshikawa, S

    N. Yoshikawa, S. Okumura, Y. Hirai, K. Ogawa, K. Fu- jiwara, J. Ikeda, A. Ozawa, T. Koretsune, R. Arita, A. Mitra, A. Tsukazaki, T. Oka, and R. Shimano, Light- induced anomalous Hall conductivity in the massive three-dimensional Dirac semimetal Co3Sn2S2, Phys. Rev. B111, 245104 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Bucciantini, S

    L. Bucciantini, S. Roy, S. Kitamura, and T. Oka, Emer- gent Weyl nodes and Fermi arcs in a Floquet Weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. B96, 041126(R) (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Zhang, K.-i

    R. Zhang, K.-i. Hino, and N. Maeshima, Floquet-Weyl semimetals generated by an optically resonant interband transition, Phys. Rev. B106, 085206 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Hirai, S

    Y. Hirai, S. Okumura, N. Yoshikawa, T. Oka, and R. Shi- mano, Floquet Weyl states at one-photon resonance: An origin of nonperturbative optical responses in three- dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. Research6, L012027 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Y. Xia, D. Qian, D. Hsieh, L. Wray, A. Pal, H. Lin, A. Bansil, D. Grauer, Y. S. Hor, R. J. Cava, and M. Z. Hasan, Observation of a large-gap topological-insulator class with a single Dirac cone on the surface, Nat. Phys. 5, 398 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Observation of Floquet-Bloch States on the Surface of a Topological Insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    S. Ito, M. Sch¨ uler, M. Meierhofer, S. Schlauderer, J. Freudenstein, J. Reimann, D. Afanasiev, K. A. Kokh, O. E. Tereshchenko, J. G¨ udde, M. A. Sentef, U. H¨ ofer, and R. Huber, Build-up and dephasing of Floquet–Bloch bands on subcycle timescales, Nature616, 696 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    R. Wang, B. Wang, R. Shen, L. Sheng, and D. Y. Xing, Floquet Weyl semimetal induced by off-resonant light, Europhys. Lett.105, 17004 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    Zhang, C.-X

    H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.- C. Zhang, Topological insulators in Bi 2Se3, Bi 2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface, Nat. Phys.5, 438 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Liu, X.-L

    C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, H. Zhang, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.- C. Zhang, Model Hamiltonian for topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B82, 045122 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    S. Mao, A. Yamakage, and Y. Kuramoto, Tight-binding model for topological insulators: Analysis of helical sur- face modes over the whole Brillouin zone, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115413 (2011)

    2011

  42. [50]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, WannierTools: An open-source software package for novel topological materials, Comput. Phys. Commun.224, 405 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y. Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, Chern Numbers in Discretized Brillouin Zone: Efficient Method of Com- puting (Spin) Hall Conductances, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.74, 1674 (2005)

    2005

  44. [52]

    Hirayama, R

    M. Hirayama, R. Okugawa, and S. Murakami, Topologi- cal semimetals studied by ab initio calculations, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn87, 041002 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Okugawa and S

    R. Okugawa and S. Murakami, Dispersion of fermi arcs in weyl semimetals and their evolutions to dirac cones, Phys. Rev. B89, 235315 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Murakami, M

    S. Murakami, M. Hirayama, R. Okugawa, and T. Miyake, Emergence of topological semimetals in gap closing in semiconductors without inversion symmetry, Sci. Adv. 3, e1602680 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, All Optical Measurement Proposed for the Photovoltaic Hall Effect, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.334, 012060 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Hirai, N

    Y. Hirai, N. Yoshikawa, M. Kawaguchi, M. Hayashi, S. Okumura, T. Oka, and R. Shimano, Anomalous Hall effect of light-driven three-dimensional Dirac elec- trons in bismuth, arXiv:2301.06072.https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2301.06072

    doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    Y. S. Hor, A. Richardella, P. Roushan, Y. Xia, J. G. Checkelsky, A. Yazdani, M. Z. Hasan, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava,p-type Bi 2Se3 for topological insulator and low-temperature thermoelectric applications, Phys. Rev. B79, 195208 (2009)

    2009

  51. [59]

    S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, N. Alidoust, M. Neupane, G. Bian, C. Zhang, R. Sankar, G. Chang, Z. Yuan, C.- C. Lee, S.-M. Huang, H. Zheng, J. Ma, D. S. Sanchez, B. Wang, A. Bansil, F. Chou, P. P. Shibayev, H. Lin, S. Jia, and M. Z. Hasan, Discovery of a Weyl fermion semimetal and t...

    2015

  52. [60]

    L. Wu, S. Patankar, T. Morimoto, N. L. Nair, E. Thewalt, A. Little, J. G. Analytis, J. E. Moore, and J. Orenstein, Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in transition metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals, Nat. Phys.13, 350 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    De Juan, A

    F. De Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals, Nat. Commun.8, 15995 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, C.-K. Chan, C.-L. Zhang, G. Chang, Y. Lin, W. Xie, T. Palacios, H. Lin, S. Jia, P. A. Lee, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Direct optical detection of Weyl fermion chirality in a topological semimetal, Nat. Phys.13, 842 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    C. Fang, M. J. Gilbert, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Multi-weyl topological semimetals stabilized by point group symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 266802 (2012)

    2012

  56. [64]

    Y. Yao, F. Ye, X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zhang, and Z. Fang, Spin-orbit gap of graphene: First-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B75, 041401(R) (2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.