Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.13774.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2505.13774 v2

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 4 of 4 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00

measured 4 of 4 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-05T13:40:58.274985Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-11T11:16:03.303665Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved0
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation df660e94-2abd-4754-be99-949a2751cd90 · inbound

A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models cites this paper.

A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models

Reference 78

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T10:39:04.273817Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7729dbc3-4d62-424b-b6a5-fa630867821b · inbound

FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoning cites this paper.

FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models

Reference 44

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T11:16:03.312937Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

Observation 23ad4e73-b7ef-42c6-89ad-399ff2c6e743 · inbound

LLM Reasoning Is Latent, Not the Chain of Thought cites this paper.

LLM Reasoning Is Latent, Not the Chain of Thought Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models

Reference 31

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T08:53:04.637091Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

Observation a20b96d2-668e-4fd7-917e-c93fd6d2546b · inbound

Risky Business: Measuring The Faithfulness-Safety Tension cites this paper.

Risky Business: Measuring The Faithfulness-Safety Tension Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models

Reference 41

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T13:40:58.274985Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.