Introduction to Shtukas and their moduli

Zhiwei Yun

Introduction to Shtukas and their moduli

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read These notes introduce shtukas for any split reductive group over $\mathbb{F}_q$ and present their moduli stacks as the geometric backbone of the Langlands correspondence over function fields.

desk verdict Solid, honest lecture notes that give a trustworthy map to G-Shtukas; the only real defect is a mis-citation, and it deserves refereeing as an exposition. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10248 v1 pith:ALH2ZRP3 submitted 2024-11-15 math.NT math.AG

Zhiwei Yun This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.NTmath.AG MSC 11G0914D20

keywords shtukasmodulistacksLanglandsprogramfunctionfieldsaffineGrassmannianHeckecorrespondencesDrinfeldmodulesgeometricSatakeequivalence

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

These lecture notes build the notion of a shtuka from scratch: for a split reductive group $G$ over $\mathbb{F}_q$, a $G$-shtuka is a $G$-torsor $E$ on a smooth projective curve $X$ together with an isomorphism, away from finitely many marked 'legs', between $E$ and its Frobenius pullback $\tau E$. The paper's goal is to show that the moduli stacks of such objects are the function-field analogues of Shimura varieties: they carry Hecke correspondences, a factorization structure, and a partial Frobenius operator, and these structures are what make the Langlands correspondence over function fields accessible. Along the way the survey sets up dictionaries relating shtukas to Drinfeld modules, Deligne-Lusztig varieties, and motives over finite fields, and it marks the boundary of its scope by leaving mixed-characteristic local shtukas aside. A reader is meant to leave with a working picture of why these 'gadgets' are the right geometric objects for automorphic forms over function fields.

What carries the argument

The engine is the Cartesian diagram defining the shtuka stack: $\mathrm{Sht}^{(I_1,\ldots,I_r)}_{G,K}$ is the fiber product of the iterated Hecke stack $\mathrm{Hk}^{(I_1,\ldots,I_r)}_{G,K}$ with the graph of Frobenius on $\mathrm{Bun}_{G,K}$, so a point is a chain of modifications $E_0 \dashrightarrow E_1 \dashrightarrow\cdots\dashrightarrow E_r$ together with an identification $E_r\cong \tau E_0$. The Hecke stack itself is controlled by the affine Grassmannian, the ind-scheme classifying $G$-torsors on a formal disk with a trivialization away from the origin, whose $L^+G$-orbits are indexed by dominant coweights; the relative-position map records the bound $\lambda$ at each leg. The geometric Satake equivalence then turns representations of the Langlands dual group into perverse sheaves on the affine Grassmannian, and the partial Frobenius, which cyclically permutes the legs and twists the Frobenius on the first leg, produces the symmetries on cohomology.

What would settle it

Take $G=\mathbb{G}_m$ with legs $I$ and bound $\lambda$: the notes predict that $\mathrm{Sht}^{I,\le\lambda}_{\mathbb{G}_m}$ is empty unless $\sum_i\lambda_i=0$, and otherwise is a torsor under the Lang isogeny $\mathrm{Pic}^0_X\to\mathrm{Pic}^0_X$. Computing this stack directly from the Cartesian definition—comparing the Abel-Jacobi map with the Lang isogeny—would either confirm or break the basic dictionary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central assertion, made as an exposition rather than a new theorem, is that the definition of a $G$-shtuka is both broad enough and rigid enough to organize the whole function-field Langlands story. With legs $I=I_1\sqcup\cdots\sqcup I_r$ and a bound $\lambda=(\lambda_i)$ of dominant coweights, the moduli stack $\mathrm{Sht}^{(I_1,\ldots,I_r),\le\lambda}_{G,K}$ is a Deligne-Mumford stack (a space whose points may have finite automorphism groups) locally of finite type, is étale locally modeled on products of affine Schubert varieties in the affine Grassmannian, and is nonempty exactly when $\lambda$ is $G$-admissible. The notes then develop the cohomological package: Satake sheaves attached to representations of the dual group, a Hecke algebra action, factorization along partial diagonals, and partial Frobenius isomorphisms $\mathrm{Fr}_i^*\mathcal{H}^I(V)\cong \mathcal{H}^I(V)$ that compose to the Weil structure. The payoff, as the notes present it, is that these symmetries are precisely the ingredients used in the automorphic-to-Galois correspondence [22] and in formulas expressing intersections of special cycles as higher derivatives of $L$-functions.

Load-bearing premise

The exposition leans on deep cited results—the geometric Satake equivalence, the representability and dimension theorems for the moduli of $G$-shtukas, and the automorphic-to-Galois correspondence—and if any of those external results were flawed, the corresponding sections of these notes would mislead.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For minuscule bounds and singleton legs, the moduli stack is smooth of pure relative dimension $\sum_i(\langle 2\rho,\lambda_i\rangle+1)$ over the leg space.
The cohomology complexes $\mathcal{H}^I(V)$ factor along partial diagonals: restricting to coincident legs recovers the lower-leg complex with the restricted representation, compatibly with compositions.
Partial Frobenius gives canonical isomorphisms $\mathrm{Fr}_i^*\mathcal{H}^I(V)\cong \mathcal{H}^I(V)$ that commute up to canonical isomorphism; their product is the Weil structure, and over a geometric generic point one obtains commuting copies of the fundamental group action.
The Hecke algebra of bi-invariant functions at a place acts on $\mathcal{H}^I(V)$, and this action is the geometric shadow of the automorphic forms whose Langlands parameters are extracted by the excursion operators.
The surveyed theorems equate intersection numbers of special cycles, such as Heegner-Drinfeld, Gan-Gross-Prasad, and Kudla-Rapoport cycles, with the $r$-th derivatives of standardized $L$-functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The notes explicitly raise the question of what geometric objects give iso-shtukas for $\mathbb{Q}$ with legs at several primes; if motives over $\mathbb{F}_p$ are iso-shtukas with legs at $p$ and $\infty$, the multi-prime version would be a genuinely new global object.
Because the local model is the affine Grassmannian, progress on the singularities of affine Schubert varieties would transfer directly to the compactifications of shtuka moduli, whose singularities the notes flag as open.
The multiple-leg flexibility underlying the higher-derivative formulas has no direct analogue on Shimura varieties, suggesting that shtuka moduli are the natural setting for higher-order arithmetic intersection theory.
The notes set aside mixed-characteristic local shtukas; testing whether the same factorization and partial-Frobenius structures exist there would show how much of this dictionary is characteristic-independent.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a survey in the honest sense: no new theorems, but a coherent, carefully organized introduction to G-Shtukas written by someone who has used them. It earns its place as a reference. The definitions are laid out cleanly (Hecke stacks, bounded versions, partial Frobenius), and the author is careful to say which results come from Varshavsky, L. Lafforgue, V. Lafforgue, and which are sketches. The notation-matching remarks that relate his stacks to [22] are genuinely useful.

The best parts are the Drinfeld-module dictionary in 3.1, the analogy chapter (Deligne-Lusztig varieties, motives over finite fields), and the last section on cycles and higher derivatives of L-functions, where the author is on home turf. The explicit statements of open questions—singularities of compactifications, the Eisenstein part of cohomology—also give readers a realistic picture of what is unknown.

The soft spots are minor. The one concrete error is in §3.1.3: the Drinfeld-module/Shtuka equivalence is attributed to [29], but in the bibliography [29] is Mumford's Toda lattice paper. The equivalence is standard and is also referenced to [14, Chapter 6], so the mistake is local and traceability-only, not mathematical. It should still be fixed before publication. The omission of Scholze's mixed-characteristic local Shtukas is openly acknowledged in §3; for lecture notes aimed at the function-field Langlands program, that is a defensible boundary. The reliance on geometric Satake and V. Lafforgue is explicit and normal for a survey; I did not find internal contradictions in the main constructions. The proof sketches are acceptable for lecture notes, though a referee might suggest marking them more visibly as sketches.

Who this is for: graduate students and researchers entering function-field Langlands, or people working on the number-field side who want the function-field machinery. It deserves serious refereeing as an expository contribution. I would hand it to a student and I would probably not cite it in my own work, but that is more about my corner of the subject than about the paper's quality. Send it to review; just have someone fix the [29] reference first.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This is an expository lecture-note survey of G-shtukas for a split connected reductive group G over F_q. It introduces the Hecke stack and the moduli stack of (bounded, iterated) G-shtukas, states non-emptiness and dimension results, relates shtukas to Drinfeld modules, Deligne-Lusztig varieties and motives over finite fields, and summarizes the geometric structures (local models, factorization, Hecke correspondences, partial Frobenius) and their consequences for cohomology. The final section surveys compactifications, special cycles, and results and conjectures connecting intersection numbers with higher derivatives of L-functions. No new theorem is claimed; deep results are cited to Drinfeld, Varshavsky, Lafforgue and others, and conjectural or open parts are clearly marked.

Significance. If taken as a survey, the notes are a valuable and generally reliable introduction to a technically difficult area. The main constructions are internally consistent and match their cited sources; the paper is careful to flag notation differences with [22] and to distinguish proved results from expectations. Its correctness of course depends on the validity of the deep external results on which it relies (geometric Satake, Varshavsky's representability and dimension theorems, and V. Lafforgue's automorphic-to-Galois correspondence), and this dependence is explicitly acknowledged. I found no circularity, no invented entities, and no load-bearing mathematical error; the defects are localized presentation and traceability issues.

minor comments (6)

[§3.1.3] The Drinfeld-module/Shtuka equivalence is attributed to '[29]', but reference [29] is Mumford's 1978 paper on the Toda lattice, which is not a source for that equivalence; please replace the citation with the appropriate source (for instance Drinfeld [6] or Goss [14, Chapter 6], the latter already cited in the same paragraph).
[§6.2.3] For the dimension assertions 'dim Sht^μ_{n,X'}=rn' and 'dim Sht^λ_{2n,X}=2rn' to hold, the sequence μ must contain equally many entries (1,0,...,0) and (0,...,0,-1); otherwise the moduli stacks are empty by Lemma 2.3.9. Please state this hypothesis, and correct the apparent typo 'Sht^μ_{2n,X}' to 'Sht^λ_{2n,X}'.
[§4.1.1] The short proof following Theorem 4.1.1 explains why Sht^{...}_{G,K} is an Artin stack locally of finite type, but the Deligne-Mumford property is not justified in the text; please add a sentence indicating that the automorphism groups are finite or explicitly citing [36, Proposition 2.16(a)] for this point.
[§3.1.3] In the Drinfeld-modules-to-Shtukas direction, the module M = Hom_S(G, G_{a,S}) is said to be locally free of rank one over O_S⟨τ⟩; a sentence identifying the relevant left and right module structures would make the filtration M'(i/n) and the definition of τM(i/n) easier to follow.
[§6.2.4] The deck involution σ of the unramified double cover ν:X'→X is used in the definitions but is never explicitly introduced; please define σ at the beginning of the example.
[References] Reference [38] is listed only as 'Lectures in the IHES summer school' without further bibliographic data; if a published or arXiv version exists, it should be cited with full details.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's claims are definitional exposition plus independent cited theorems; the localized citation error in §3.1.3 is a traceability defect, not circularity.

full rationale

This paper is a survey of lecture notes whose stated purpose is to 'introduce from scratch the notion of Shtukas for a split reductive group over Fq' and to survey their moduli and applications. It contains no new theorem whose conclusion could coincide with an input by construction. The definitions—G-torsors, level structures, Hecke stacks, the Cartesian diagram (2.2) defining Sht^{...}, bounded versions, partial Frobenius, and Hecke correspondences—are unfolded from standard objects and from explicitly cited external results. The geometric theorems quoted as theorems are attributed to Varshavsky [36] and V. Lafforgue [22], and the geometric Satake equivalence to [28]; these are independent, published inputs, not results of the present paper. Self-citations do appear (e.g., [9], [10], [39], [40], [41], [42]), but they are pointers to prior published work on special cycles and L-functions and are not load-bearing for the expository claim. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's own prior work as a forced choice. The only concrete defect is a citation error in §3.1.3: the paper says, 'According to [29], there is a canonical equivalence of groupoids Dr_n(S) ∼= Sht^{Dr}_n(S),' but bibliography entry [29] is Mumford's 1978 article on the Toda lattice, which cannot support that equivalence. The surrounding text also refers to [14, Chapter 6], and the dictionary itself is standard, so this is a localized traceability error rather than circularity. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is expository; it introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. It relies on standard definitions and on the body of published results it cites.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Geometric Satake equivalence as established by Mirkovic and Vilonen
Invoked in Section 5.1.1 to define Satake sheaves and in the proof of Proposition 5.3.3. The survey does not prove this equivalence.
domain assumption Varshavsky's theorems on representability, dimension, and local models of moduli of G-Shtukas
Used in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 (Prop 2.16 and Thm 2.20 of [36]). The paper relies on these results without reproving them fully.
domain assumption V. Lafforgue's construction of excursion operators and the automorphic to Galois direction of the Langlands correspondence for reductive groups over function fields
Used in Sections 5.2.3 and 5.3.1 as background for cohomological applications. Cited as [22].
domain assumption Drinfeld's classification of iso-Shtukas
Theorem 2.4.4 is quoted from Drinfeld [7]; the proof is only sketched in one direction in Section 2.4.4.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Introduction to Shtukas and their moduli." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ALH2ZRP3

@misc{pith2026241110248,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Introduction to Shtukas and their moduli},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ALH2ZRP3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10248}
}

read the original abstract

These are lectures notes of my talks at the IHES summer school on the Langlands program in 2022. We give an introduction to the notion of Shtukas, their relation with more familiar geometric objects, their moduli spaces and applications to automorphic forms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

[22]

Laﬀorgue, Chtoucas pour les groupes r´ eductifs et pa ram´ etrisation de Langlands globale

V. Laﬀorgue, Chtoucas pour les groupes r´ eductifs et pa ram´ etrisation de Langlands globale. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (2018), no. 3, 719–891

work page 2018
[29]

Mumford, An algebro-geometric construction of comm uting operators and of solutions to the Toda lattice equation, Korteweg deVries equation and related nonlinear equation

D. Mumford, An algebro-geometric construction of comm uting operators and of solutions to the Toda lattice equation, Korteweg deVries equation and related nonlinear equation. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Algebraic Geometry (Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, 1977), pp. 115–153, Kinokuniya Book St ore, Tokyo, 1978

work page 1977
[1]

Arasteh Rad, U

E. Arasteh Rad, U. Hartl, Uniformizing the moduli stacks of global G-shtukas. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2021, no. 21, 16121–16192

work page 2021
[2]

Duke Math

G.Anderson, t-motives. Duke Math. J. 53 (1986), no. 2, 457–502

work page 1986
[3]

Functoriality of Moduli Spaces of Global $\mathbb G$-Shtukas

P. Breutmann, Functoriality of Moduli Spaces of Global G-Shtukas. arXiv:1902.10602

work page Pith review arXiv 1902
[4]

Deligne, G

P. Deligne, G. Lusztig, Representations of reductive gr oups over ﬁnite ﬁelds. Ann. of Math. (2) 103 (1976), no. 1, 103–161

work page 1976
[5]

Drinfeld, Elliptic modules

V. Drinfeld, Elliptic modules. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 94(136) ( 1974), 594–627, 656. Elliptic modules II. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 102(144) (1977), no. 2, 182–194, 325

work page 1977
[6]

Drinfeld, Moduli varieties of F -sheaves

V. Drinfeld, Moduli varieties of F -sheaves. Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 21 (1987), no. 2, 23–41

work page 1987

Show all 45 references

[7]

Drinfeld, Proof of the Petersson conjecture for GL(2) over a global ﬁeld of characteristic p

V. Drinfeld, Proof of the Petersson conjecture for GL(2) over a global ﬁeld of characteristic p. Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 22 (1988), no. 1, 34–54, 96; translation i n Funct. Anal. Appl. 22 (1988), no. 1, 28–43

1988
[8]

V.Drinfeld, Cohomology of compactiﬁed moduli varietie s of F -sheaves of rank 2. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI) 162 (1987), Av tomorfn. Funkts. i Teor. Chisel. III, 107–158, 189; translation in J. Soviet Math. 46 (1989), no. 2, 1789–18 21

1987
[9]

T. Feng, Z. Yun, W. Zhang, Higher Siegel–Weil formula for unitary groups: the non-singular terms. Invent. Math. 235 (2024), no. 2, 569–668

2024
[10]

T. Feng, Z. Yun, W. Zhang, Higher theta series for unitar y groups over function ﬁelds. arXiv:2110.07001. To appear in Ann. Sci. E.N.S

arXiv
[11]

T. Feng, Z. Yun, W. Zhang, Modularity of higher theta ser ies I: cohomology of the generic ﬁber. arXiv: 2308.10979

arXiv
[12]

Gan, B.Gross, D.Prasad, Symplectic local root num bers, central critical L values, and restriction problems in the representation theory of classical groups

W-T. Gan, B.Gross, D.Prasad, Symplectic local root num bers, central critical L values, and restriction problems in the representation theory of classical groups. Sur les conjectures de Gross et Prasad. I. Ast´ erisque No. 346 (2012), 1–109

2012
[13]

Genestier, V

A. Genestier, V. Laﬀorgue, Chtoucas restreints pour le s groupes r´ eductifs et param´ etrisation de Langlands locale. arXiv:1709.00978. INTRODUCTION TO SHTUKAS AND THEIR MODULI 37

arXiv
[14]

Goss, Basic structures of function ﬁeld arithmetic

D. Goss, Basic structures of function ﬁeld arithmetic. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), 35. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996. xiv+422 pp

1996
[15]

Jannsen, Motives, numerical equivalence, and semi- simplicity, Invent

U. Jannsen, Motives, numerical equivalence, and semi- simplicity, Invent. Math. 107, 1992, 447–452

1992
[16]

Kottwitz, B(G) for all local and global ﬁelds

R. Kottwitz, B(G) for all local and global ﬁelds. arXiv:1401.5728

arXiv
[17]

S.Kudla, Central derivatives of Eisenstein series and height pairings, Ann. of Math. (2) 146 (1997), no. 3, 545–646

1997
[18]

Kudla, M.Rapoport, Special cycles on unitary Shimur a varieties I: Unramiﬁed local theory, Invent

S. Kudla, M.Rapoport, Special cycles on unitary Shimur a varieties I: Unramiﬁed local theory, Invent. Math. 184 (2011), no. 3, 629–682

2011
[19]

Kudla, M

S. Kudla, M. Rapoport, Special cycles on unitary Shimur a varieties II: Global theory, J. Reine Angew. Math. 697 (2014), 91–157

2014
[20]

Laﬀorgue, Une compactiﬁcation des champs classiﬁan t les chtoucas de Drinfeld

L. Laﬀorgue, Une compactiﬁcation des champs classiﬁan t les chtoucas de Drinfeld. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 11 (1998), no. 4, 1001–1036

1998
[21]

Laﬀorgue, Chtoucas de Drinfeld et correspondance de Langlands

L. Laﬀorgue, Chtoucas de Drinfeld et correspondance de Langlands. Invent. Math. 147 (2002), no. 1, 1–241

2002
[23]

Langlands, M.Rapoport, Shimuravariet¨ aten und Ger ben

R. Langlands, M.Rapoport, Shimuravariet¨ aten und Ger ben. J. Reine Angew. Math. 378 (1987), 113–220

1987
[24]

Laumon, M

G. Laumon, M. Rapoport, U. Stuhler, D-elliptic sheaves and the Langlands correspondence. Inven t. Math. 113 (1993), no. 2, 217–338

1993
[25]

Laumon, Drinfeld shtukas

G. Laumon, Drinfeld shtukas. In Vector bundles on curves– new directions (Cetraro, 1995), 50–109, Lecture Notes in Math., 1649, Fond. CIME/CIME Found. Subser., Sprin ger, Berlin, 1997

1995
[26]

C. Li, W. Zhang, Kudla-Rapoport cycles and derivatives of local densities. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 (2022), no. 3, 705–797

2022
[27]

Milne, Motives over ﬁnite ﬁelds

J. Milne, Motives over ﬁnite ﬁelds. In Motives (Seattle, W A, 1991), 401–459, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 55, Part 1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994

1991
[28]

Mirkovic, K.Vilonen, Geometric Langlands duality a nd representations of algebraic groups over commu- tative rings

I. Mirkovic, K.Vilonen, Geometric Langlands duality a nd representations of algebraic groups over commu- tative rings. Ann. of Math. (2) 166 (2007), no. 1, 95–143

2007
[30]

Ngˆ o Dac, Compactiﬁcation des champs de chtoucas et t h´ eorie g´ eom´ etrique des invariants

T. Ngˆ o Dac, Compactiﬁcation des champs de chtoucas et t h´ eorie g´ eom´ etrique des invariants. Ast´ erisque No. 313 (2007), 124 pp

2007
[31]

Ngˆ o Dac, Introduction to the stacks of shtukas

T. Ngˆ o Dac, Introduction to the stacks of shtukas. Alge braic cycles, sheaves, shtukas, and moduli, 217–236, Trends Math., Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2008

2008
[32]

Pappas, M

G. Pappas, M. Rapoport, Twisted loop groups and their aﬃ ne ﬂag varieties. With an appendix by T. Haines and Rapoport. Adv. Math. 219 (2008), no. 1, 118–198

2008
[33]

Rapoport, A guide to the reduction modulo p of Shimura varieties, in Automorphic Forms

M. Rapoport, A guide to the reduction modulo p of Shimura varieties, in Automorphic Forms. I, 298, 2005, pp. 271–318

2005
[34]

Scholze, J

P. Scholze, J. Weinstein, Berkeley lectures on p-adic geometry. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 207. Prince - ton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2020. x+250 pp

2020
[35]

Scholze, p-adic geometry

P. Scholze, p-adic geometry. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicia ns–Rio de Janeiro
[36]

Selecta Math

Y.Varshavsky, Moduli spaces of principal F -bundles. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 10 (2004), no. 1, 131–166

2004
[37]

´Epijournal G´ eom

C.Xue, Finiteness of cohomology groups of stacks of sht ukas as modules over Hecke algebras, and applica- tions. ´Epijournal G´ eom. Alg´ ebrique 4 (2020), Art. 6, 42 pp

2020
[38]

Xue, Lectures in the IHES summer school

C. Xue, Lectures in the IHES summer school
[39]

Z. Yun, W. Zhang, Shtukas and the Taylor expansion of L-functions. Ann. of Math. (2) 186 (2017), no. 3, 767–911

2017
[40]

Z. Yun, W. Zhang, Shtukas and the Taylor expansion of L-functions (II). Ann. of Math. (2) 189 (2019), no. 2, 393–526

2019
[41]

Yun, Hitchin type moduli stacks in automorphic repre sentation theory

Z. Yun, Hitchin type moduli stacks in automorphic repre sentation theory. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians – Rio de Janeiro 2018. Vol. II. In vited lectures, 1447–1476, World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2018

2018
[42]

Yun, Special cycles for Shtukas are closed

Z. Yun, Special cycles for Shtukas are closed. Pure Appl . Math. Q. 18 (2022), no. 5, 2203–2220

2022
[43]

Zhu, An introduction to aﬃne Grassmannians and the ge ometric Satake equivalence

X. Zhu, An introduction to aﬃne Grassmannians and the ge ometric Satake equivalence. In Geometry of Moduli Spaces and Representation Theory , IAS/Park City Mathematical Series vol 24. 38 ZHIWEI YUN
[44]

Zhu, Coherent sheaves on the stack of Langlands param eters

X. Zhu, Coherent sheaves on the stack of Langlands param eters. arXiv:2008.02998. Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Tec hnology, 77 Massachusetts A ve, Cambridge, MA 02139 Email address : zyun@mit.edu

2008
[2018]

Vol. I. Plenary lectures, 899–933, World Sci. Publ., Hacke nsack, NJ, 2018

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [22]

Laﬀorgue, Chtoucas pour les groupes r´ eductifs et pa ram´ etrisation de Langlands globale

V. Laﬀorgue, Chtoucas pour les groupes r´ eductifs et pa ram´ etrisation de Langlands globale. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (2018), no. 3, 719–891

work page 2018

[2] [29]

Mumford, An algebro-geometric construction of comm uting operators and of solutions to the Toda lattice equation, Korteweg deVries equation and related nonlinear equation

D. Mumford, An algebro-geometric construction of comm uting operators and of solutions to the Toda lattice equation, Korteweg deVries equation and related nonlinear equation. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Algebraic Geometry (Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, 1977), pp. 115–153, Kinokuniya Book St ore, Tokyo, 1978

work page 1977

[3] [1]

Arasteh Rad, U

E. Arasteh Rad, U. Hartl, Uniformizing the moduli stacks of global G-shtukas. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2021, no. 21, 16121–16192

work page 2021

[4] [2]

Duke Math

G.Anderson, t-motives. Duke Math. J. 53 (1986), no. 2, 457–502

work page 1986

[5] [3]

Functoriality of Moduli Spaces of Global $\mathbb G$-Shtukas

P. Breutmann, Functoriality of Moduli Spaces of Global G-Shtukas. arXiv:1902.10602

work page Pith review arXiv 1902

[6] [4]

Deligne, G

P. Deligne, G. Lusztig, Representations of reductive gr oups over ﬁnite ﬁelds. Ann. of Math. (2) 103 (1976), no. 1, 103–161

work page 1976

[7] [5]

Drinfeld, Elliptic modules

V. Drinfeld, Elliptic modules. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 94(136) ( 1974), 594–627, 656. Elliptic modules II. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 102(144) (1977), no. 2, 182–194, 325

work page 1977

[8] [6]

Drinfeld, Moduli varieties of F -sheaves

V. Drinfeld, Moduli varieties of F -sheaves. Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 21 (1987), no. 2, 23–41

work page 1987