pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30299 · v1 · pith:AMAFXXBVnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Spatially Coherent and Intermittent Alfv\'enic Fluctuations in Solar Polar Spicules

Edris Tajfirouze , Christopher H. K. Chen , Richard J. Morton , Peter R. Young This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 03:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords solar spiculesAlfvénic fluctuationsturbulent cascadeintermittencysolar coronavelocity power spectraIRIS observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polar spicules contain multiscale Alfvénic velocity fluctuations whose spectra and statistics match a developing turbulent cascade.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures transverse and Doppler velocity fluctuations in quiet-Sun polar spicules from Si IV 1394 Å spectra taken by the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph. Fourier analysis in time and space yields broadband temporal power with a 4-6 mHz peak and a spatial spectrum scaling as k_perp to the -1.43; velocity-increment PDFs are non-Gaussian with kurtosis rising at smaller scales, and cross-correlation shows spatial coherence over a few hundred to about a thousand kilometers. These signatures are presented as evidence that the fluctuations are Alfvénic and consistent with the early stages of a turbulent cascade plus intermittency. A reader would care because the result directly ties dynamic structures in the lower atmosphere to a possible channel for energy delivery into the corona.

Core claim

Observations of the Si IV 1394 Å line in quiet-Sun polar spicules show transverse and Doppler velocity fluctuations with temporal power spectra exhibiting enhanced power between 3-7 mHz and a peak near 4-6 mHz, a perpendicular spatial power spectrum scaling as approximately k_perp^{-1.43}, non-Gaussian velocity-increment PDFs whose kurtosis increases toward smaller scales, and an outer spatial-coherence scale of a few hundred to roughly one thousand kilometers. The authors interpret the combination of spectral slopes, intermittency, and coherence as observational evidence that polar spicules host multiscale Alfvénic fluctuations consistent with a developing turbulent cascade and intermittenc

What carries the argument

Fourier power spectra of temporal and spatial velocity fluctuations, probability distribution functions of velocity increments, and cross-correlation diagnostics for spatial coherence.

If this is right

  • Spicules function as conduits that carry Alfvénic energy from the lower atmosphere into the corona.
  • The observed spectral index is consistent with reflection-driven turbulence simulations.
  • Intermittency at small scales implies localized dissipation within the spicules themselves.
  • The measured outer coherence scale sets a lower bound on the driving scale of the fluctuations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the cascade continues into the corona, the measured fluctuation amplitudes could supply a non-negligible fraction of the energy required to heat the quiet corona.
  • Repeating the same analysis on spicules in active regions would test whether the spectral slope and intermittency depend on the background magnetic field strength.
  • Higher-cadence observations that resolve scales below the current outer scale could reveal whether the power law steepens further, as expected in a fully developed cascade.

Load-bearing premise

The observed transverse and Doppler velocity fluctuations are dominantly Alfvénic and the measured power-law scaling together with rising kurtosis directly trace the start of a turbulent energy cascade.

What would settle it

Independent high-resolution spectra showing that the velocity fluctuations contain substantial non-Alfvénic contributions or that kurtosis stays constant across scales would falsify the turbulent-cascade interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30299 by Christopher H. K. Chen, Edris Tajfirouze, Peter R. Young, Richard J. Morton.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Panel (a) displays a raster scan of the region from IRIS at Si IV λ1400 ˚A. The green dotted line indicates the location of the sit-and-stare observations. Panel (b) shows the peak line intensity for Si IV λ 1393.75 ˚A from the sit-and-stare observations. Here we analyze transverse oscillations in quiet-Sun polar spicules using IRIS observations (De Pontieu et al. 2014), whose design specifically targets t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two examples of spectra with Gaussian fits over-plotted with a red solid line. Panel (a) shows the spectrum at position x = 30.21′′ and time t = 1411.7 s with a Gaussian fit yielding χ 2 = 0.4. Panel (b) shows the spectrum at position x = −50.3 ′′ and time t = 2277.3 s with a Gaussian fit yielding χ 2 = 6.83. The dashed blue line shows the reference wavelength. small-scale, low-lying transition-region loop… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Panel (a) shows the Doppler velocity map derived from the emission line fit, with three distinct boxes indicating the regions where power spectra were calculated. The Doppler velocity map has been resampled and interpolated to fill missing values. Panel (b) displays the power spectra of the Doppler velocities from the selected regions, with the fitted models over￾plotted as black dashed lines. To avoid ove… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cross-spectral analysis of Doppler velocity and intensity. Panel (a): Spatially averaged coherence versus frequency for the three selected regions, R1, R2, and R3. Panel (b): Corresponding spatially averaged phase differences versus frequency for the same regions. overplotted on the observed spectra in Figure 3b. This approach enables direct comparison of the spectral char￾acteristics of TR plasma at coron… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Upper panel: Filtered velocity time–distance diagrams for the three selected regions, R1, R2, and R3. Lower panel: Average correlation as a function of distance for each region (solid curves), with overplotted Gaussian model fits (red curves). The average correlation computed over the full frequency spectrum (i.e., without filtering) is also shown (black dashed curve), together with its corresponding Gauss… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The spatial power spectra for three different time intervals marked in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Probability density functions (PDFs) of the normalized increments for different spatial increments. Panels (a), (b), and (c) correspond to regions R1, R2, and R3, respectively, as marked in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The kurtosis as a function of spatial increments. Panels (a), (b), and (c) correspond to regions R1, R2, and R3, respectively, as marked in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Alfv\'enic fluctuations are considered a key mechanism for transporting energy from the lower solar atmosphere into the corona, with spicules acting as dynamic conduits for this transfer. We investigate transverse and Doppler velocity fluctuations in quiet-Sun polar spicules observed in the Si IV 1394\,\AA\ line by the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph. Fourier analysis in time and space is used to characterize power across frequency and spatial scales. The temporal power spectra show broadband fluctuations with enhanced power in the 3--7~mHz range and a peak near 4--6~mHz. Spatial Fourier analysis of Doppler velocities reveals a perpendicular power spectrum scaling as $\sim k_{\perp}^{-1.43}$, slightly shallower than the canonical $-5/3$ and $-3/2$ slopes of strong MHD turbulence, but consistent with reflection-driven turbulence simulations. Velocity increment PDFs show non-Gaussian behavior, with kurtosis increasing toward smaller scales, consistent with intermittency. Spatial coherence analysis using cross-correlation and spectral diagnostics indicates an outer scale of a few hundred to about a thousand kilometres, with cross-correlation yielding smaller values. These results provide observational evidence that polar spicules host multiscale Alfv\'enic fluctuations consistent with a developing turbulent cascade and intermittency, suggesting a role in energy transport into the solar corona.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes transverse and Doppler velocity fluctuations in quiet-Sun polar spicules observed in the Si IV 1394 Å line with IRIS. Temporal Fourier spectra show broadband power with a peak near 4–6 mHz; spatial Fourier analysis yields a perpendicular spectrum scaling as ∼k⊥^{-1.43}; velocity-increment PDFs are non-Gaussian with kurtosis rising at smaller scales; cross-correlation and spectral diagnostics indicate spatial coherence on scales of a few hundred to ∼1000 km. The authors interpret these statistics as evidence that polar spicules host multiscale Alfvénic fluctuations consistent with a developing turbulent cascade and intermittency, thereby contributing to energy transport into the corona.

Significance. If the fluctuations can be shown to be dominantly Alfvénic and the power-law and kurtosis results can be robustly linked to a turbulent cascade, the work would supply useful observational constraints on wave-mediated energy transport in the chromosphere–corona interface, a topic of direct relevance to coronal heating models.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (final sentence) and the interpretive discussion: the central claim equates the observed transverse/Doppler fluctuations with multiscale Alfvénic turbulence on the basis of the k⊥^{-1.43} spectrum and rising kurtosis. No polarization, magnetic-field, or forward-modeling diagnostics are supplied to isolate the Alfvénic component from possible fast/slow-mode contamination, line-of-sight superposition, or instrumental artifacts; this assumption is load-bearing for the link to a turbulent cascade and coronal energy transport.
  2. [Spatial Fourier analysis] Spatial Fourier analysis section: the reported ∼k⊥^{-1.43} scaling is stated to be consistent with reflection-driven turbulence simulations, yet the manuscript provides neither formal uncertainties on the index, robustness tests against Fourier windowing or spatial binning choices, nor quantitative comparison to the cited simulation slopes; without these the claimed consistency cannot be evaluated and the result remains difficult to use as a constraint.
  3. [Methods / Data analysis] Data selection and error propagation: the manuscript does not detail the criteria used to select spicules or pixels, nor how uncertainties from line fitting, background subtraction, or finite signal-to-noise are propagated into the power spectra and kurtosis values; these omissions prevent assessment of whether the reported scalings and non-Gaussianity are robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Spatial analysis] Notation: the symbol k⊥ is introduced without an explicit definition of the perpendicular direction relative to the local magnetic field or line of sight.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: several panels lack explicit labels for the frequency or wavenumber ranges over which the power-law fits were performed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment below with point-by-point responses. Where the manuscript was lacking in detail or robustness, we have revised accordingly; in cases where new observational diagnostics are unavailable, we have added explicit discussion of assumptions and limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final sentence) and the interpretive discussion: the central claim equates the observed transverse/Doppler fluctuations with multiscale Alfvénic turbulence on the basis of the k⊥^{-1.43} spectrum and rising kurtosis. No polarization, magnetic-field, or forward-modeling diagnostics are supplied to isolate the Alfvénic component from possible fast/slow-mode contamination, line-of-sight superposition, or instrumental artifacts; this assumption is load-bearing for the link to a turbulent cascade and coronal energy transport.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the dataset does not include polarization or vector magnetic field measurements that would allow direct mode separation. Our interpretation follows the standard association in the literature of transverse spicule motions observed in transition-region lines with Alfvénic fluctuations. In revision we have added explicit caveats to the abstract and discussion sections stating the assumptions, possible fast/slow-mode contributions, and line-of-sight effects. We also cite supporting forward-modeling work that validates the Alfvénic interpretation for comparable IRIS observations. These changes clarify the evidential basis without overstating the diagnostics. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Spatial Fourier analysis] Spatial Fourier analysis section: the reported ∼k⊥^{-1.43} scaling is stated to be consistent with reflection-driven turbulence simulations, yet the manuscript provides neither formal uncertainties on the index, robustness tests against Fourier windowing or spatial binning choices, nor quantitative comparison to the cited simulation slopes; without these the claimed consistency cannot be evaluated and the result remains difficult to use as a constraint.

    Authors: We agree that the spectral analysis requires greater rigor. The revised manuscript now reports the index with formal uncertainties from least-squares fitting and bootstrap resampling. Additional tests using Hanning and Blackman windows and varied spatial binning confirm stability within ±0.1. We also provide a direct quantitative comparison, noting that -1.43 ± 0.08 lies within the range reported by the cited reflection-driven turbulence simulations. These results are presented in an expanded analysis subsection. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methods / Data analysis] Data selection and error propagation: the manuscript does not detail the criteria used to select spicules or pixels, nor how uncertainties from line fitting, background subtraction, or finite signal-to-noise are propagated into the power spectra and kurtosis values; these omissions prevent assessment of whether the reported scalings and non-Gaussianity are robust.

    Authors: We have expanded the Methods section with the requested details: spicule selection uses intensity thresholds (>3σ above background) plus manual verification; pixels are retained only if line-core SNR >5; velocity uncertainties from Gaussian fitting are propagated via 1000-iteration Monte Carlo simulations to derive errors on spectra and kurtosis. A brief discussion of background-subtraction sensitivity is also included. These additions allow direct evaluation of robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational reporting of spectra and statistics

full rationale

The paper performs Fourier analysis on observed Si IV Doppler and transverse velocities in polar spicules, reports measured power spectra (~k⊥^{-1.43}), kurtosis trends, and cross-correlation scales, then states consistency with Alfvénic turbulence. No equations define a quantity in terms of itself, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing claims rest on self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work. All central results are direct outputs of the data reduction; the interpretive link to energy transport is an external assumption, not a reduction internal to the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described beyond standard Fourier and statistical analysis of spectroscopic data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5782 in / 1174 out tokens · 48371 ms · 2026-06-30T03:53:30.796221+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    R., Duvall, Thomas L., J., & Jefferies, S

    Anderson, E. R., Duvall, Thomas L., J., & Jefferies, S. M. 1990, ApJ, 364, 699, doi: 10.1086/169452

    work page doi:10.1086/169452 1990

  2. [2]

    J., Winebarger, A., Tsiklauri, D., & Peter, H

    Aschwanden, M. J., Winebarger, A., Tsiklauri, D., & Peter, H. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1673, doi: 10.1086/513070 Sample article13

    work page doi:10.1086/513070 2007

  3. [3]

    G., & Holzer, T

    Athay, R. G., & Holzer, T. E. 1982, ApJ, 255, 743, doi: 10.1086/159873

    work page doi:10.1086/159873 1982

  4. [4]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada363

    Bailey, Z., Bandyopadhyay, R., Habbal, S., & Druckm¨ uller, M. 2025, ApJL, 980, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada363

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ada363 2025

  5. [5]

    B., Nakariakov, V

    Bate, W., Jess, D. B., Nakariakov, V. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5c53

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5c53 2022

  6. [6]

    A Global Survey of EUV Corona Power Spectra

    Battams, K., Gallagher, B. M., & Weigel, R. S. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1707.02448, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1707.02448

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.02448 2017

  7. [7]

    Beckers, J. M. 1968, SoPh, 3, 367, doi: 10.1007/BF00171614

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00171614 1968

  8. [8]

    2013, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 10, 2, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2013-2

    Bruno, R., & Carbone, V. 2013, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 10, 2, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2013-2

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2013-2 2013

  9. [9]

    S., & Goossens, M

    Cally, P. S., & Goossens, M. 2008, SoPh, 251, 251, doi: 10.1007/s11207-007-9086-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-007-9086-3 2008

  10. [10]

    Chandran, B. D. G., & Perez, J. C. 2019, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85, 905850409, doi: 10.1017/S0022377819000540

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377819000540 2019

  11. [11]

    Chandran, B. D. G., Sioulas, N., Bale, S., et al. 2025, Journal of Plasma Physics, 91, E57, doi: 10.1017/S0022377825000194

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377825000194 2025

  12. [12]

    Chen, C. H. K. 2016, Journal of Plasma Physics, 82, 535820602, doi: 10.1017/S0022377816001124

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377816001124 2016

  13. [13]

    Chen, C. H. K., Sorriso-Valvo, L., ˇSafr´ ankov´ a, J., & Nˇ emeˇ cek, Z. 2014, ApJL, 789, L8, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/789/1/L8

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/789/1/l8 2014

  14. [14]

    R., & van Ballegooijen, A

    Cranmer, S. R., & van Ballegooijen, A. A. 2005, ApJS, 156, 265, doi: 10.1086/426507 De Moortel, I., & Pascoe, D. J. 2012a, ApJ, 746, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/31 —. 2012b, ApJ, 746, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/31 —. 2012c, ApJ, 746, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/31 De Pontieu, B., Erd´ elyi, R., & De Moortel, I. 2005, The Astrophysical Jour...

    work page doi:10.1086/426507 2005

  15. [15]

    Schrijver, C. J. 2009, ApJL, 701, L1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/701/1/L1 De Pontieu, B., McIntosh, S. W., Carlsson, M., et al. 2007, Science, 318, 1574, doi: 10.1126/science.1151747 de Pontieu, B., McIntosh, S., Hansteen, V. H., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S655, doi: 10.1093/pasj/59.sp3.S655 De Pontieu, B., Title, A. M., Lemen, J. R., et al. 2014, SoPh, 289, 2733...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/701/1/l1 2009

  16. [16]

    G., Wieman, S., & Woods, T

    Didkovsky, L., Judge, D., Kosovichev, A. G., Wieman, S., & Woods, T. 2011, ApJL, 738, L7, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/738/1/L7

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/738/1/l7 2011

  17. [17]

    H., Milano, L

    Dmitruk, P., Matthaeus, W. H., Milano, L. J., & Oughton, S. 2001, Physics of Plasmas, 8, 2377, doi: 10.1063/1.1344563

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1344563 2001

  18. [18]

    1995, Turbulence

    Frisch, U. 1995, Turbulence. The legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139170666

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139170666 1995

  19. [19]

    1995, ApJ, 438, 763, doi: 10.1086/175121

    Goldreich, P., & Sridhar, S. 1995, ApJ, 438, 763, doi: 10.1086/175121

    work page doi:10.1086/175121 1995

  20. [20]

    2012, ApJ, 753, 111, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/111

    Goossens, M., Andries, J., Soler, R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 111, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/111

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/111 2012

  21. [21]

    2015, SoPh, 290, 3023, doi: 10.1007/s11207-015-0772-2

    Guglielmi, A., Potapov, A., & Dovbnya, B. 2015, SoPh, 290, 3023, doi: 10.1007/s11207-015-0772-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-015-0772-2 2015

  22. [22]

    J., et al

    Hahn, M., Fu, X., Hofmeister, S. J., et al. 2025a, ApJ, 984, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc1c0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc1c0

  23. [23]

    J., Koukras, A., & Savin, D

    Hahn, M., Hofmeister, S. J., Koukras, A., & Savin, D. W. 2025b, ApJ, 991, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae017f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae017f

  24. [24]

    2014, Science, 346, 1255757, doi: 10.1126/science.1255757

    Hansteen, V., De Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al. 2014, Science, 346, 1255757, doi: 10.1126/science.1255757

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1255757 2014

  25. [25]

    H., de Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al

    Hansteen, V. H., de Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S699, doi: 10.1093/pasj/59.sp3.S699

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/59.sp3.s699 2007

  26. [26]

    S., Tu, C

    He, J. S., Tu, C. Y., Marsch, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 497, 525, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810777

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810777 2009

  27. [27]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.10906, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.10906

    Huang, Z., Velli, M., Panasenco, O., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.10906, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.10906

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.10906 2025

  28. [28]

    Iroshnikov, P. S. 1964, Soviet Ast., 7, 566

    1964

  29. [29]

    J., Tessein, J

    Isaacs, J. J., Tessein, J. A., & Matthaeus, W. H. 2015, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 120, 868, doi: 10.1002/2014JA020661

    work page doi:10.1002/2014ja020661 2015

  30. [30]

    B., Mathioudakis, M., Erd´ elyi, R., et al

    Jess, D. B., Mathioudakis, M., Erd´ elyi, R., et al. 2009, Science, 323, 1582, doi: 10.1126/science.1168680

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1168680 2009

  31. [31]

    Kayshap, P., & Young, P. R. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 383, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2761

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2761 2023

  32. [32]

    A., & L´ opez Fuentes, M

    Klimchuk, J. A., & L´ opez Fuentes, M. C. 2006, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 848, Recent Advances in Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed. N. Solomos (AIP), 55–63

    2006

  33. [33]

    Kraichnan, R. H. 1965, Physics of Fluids, 8, 1385, doi: 10.1063/1.1761412

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1761412 1965

  34. [34]

    2019, ApJ, 882, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab357c

    Magyar, N., Van Doorsselaere, T., & Goossens, M. 2019, ApJ, 882, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab357c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab357c 2019

  35. [35]

    H., Mullan, D

    Matthaeus, W. H., Mullan, D. J., Dmitruk, P., Milano, L., & Oughton, S. 2003, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 10, 93, doi: 10.5194/npg-10-93-2003

    work page doi:10.5194/npg-10-93-2003 2003

  36. [36]

    H., Zank, G

    Matthaeus, W. H., Zank, G. P., Oughton, S., Mullan, D. J., & Dmitruk, P. 1999, ApJL, 523, L93, doi: 10.1086/312259

    work page doi:10.1086/312259 1999

  37. [37]

    W., & De Pontieu, B

    McIntosh, S. W., & De Pontieu, B. 2012, ApJ, 761, 138, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/138

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/138 2012

  38. [38]

    W., de Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al

    McIntosh, S. W., de Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al. 2011, Nature, 475, 477, doi: 10.1038/nature10235

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10235 2011

  39. [39]

    2025, ApJ, 982, 199, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adba54

    Mondal, S., Banerjee, S., & Sorriso-Valvo, L. 2025, ApJ, 982, 199, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adba54

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adba54 2025

  40. [40]

    J., Molnar, M., Cranmer, S

    Morton, R. J., Molnar, M., Cranmer, S. R., & Schad, T. A. 2025, ApJ, 982, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb8df

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb8df 2025

  41. [41]

    J., & Soler, R

    Morton, R. J., & Soler, R. 2025a, ApJL, 986, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/add7da 14Tajfirouze et al. —. 2025b, ApJL, 986, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/add7da

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/add7da 2041

  42. [42]

    J., Tomczyk, S., & Pinto, R

    Morton, R. J., Tomczyk, S., & Pinto, R. 2015, Nature Communications, 6, 7813, doi: 10.1038/ncomms8813

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms8813 2015

  43. [43]

    J., Tomczyk, S., & Pinto, R

    Morton, R. J., Tomczyk, S., & Pinto, R. F. 2016, ApJ, 828, 89, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/89

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/828/2/89 2016

  44. [44]

    J., Verth, G., Fedun, V., Shelyag, S., & Erd´ elyi, R

    Morton, R. J., Verth, G., Fedun, V., Shelyag, S., & Erd´ elyi, R. 2013, ApJ, 768, 17, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/17

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/17 2013

  45. [45]

    J., Weberg, M

    Morton, R. J., Weberg, M. J., & McLaughlin, J. A. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 223, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0668-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0668-9 2019

  46. [46]

    J., & De Pontieu, B

    Okamoto, T. J., & De Pontieu, B. 2011a, ApJL, 736, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/736/2/L24 —. 2011b, ApJL, 736, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/736/2/L24

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/736/2/l24 2041

  47. [47]

    T., Matthaeus, W

    Osman, K. T., Matthaeus, W. H., Greco, A., & Servidio, S. 2011, ApJL, 727, L11, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/727/1/L11

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/727/1/l11 2011

  48. [48]

    Pant, V., Magyar, N., Van Doorsselaere, T., & Morton, R. J. 2019, ApJ, 881, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2da3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2da3 2019

  49. [49]

    C., & Chandran, B

    Perez, J. C., & Chandran, B. D. 2013a, in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2013, AGU Fall Meeting

    2013

  50. [50]

    C., & Chandran, B

    Perez, J. C., & Chandran, B. D. 2013b, in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2013, AGU Fall Meeting

    2013

  51. [51]

    C., & Chandran, B

    Perez, J. C., & Chandran, B. D. G. 2013c, ApJ, 776, 124, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/124

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/2/124

  52. [52]

    W., & Kopp, R

    Pneuman, G. W., & Kopp, R. A. 1978, SoPh, 57, 49, doi: 10.1007/BF00152043

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00152043 1978

  53. [53]

    2026, ApJ, 1001, 173, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5792

    Qi, Y., Guo, M., Huang, Z., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1001, 173, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5792

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5792 2026

  54. [54]

    K., Del Zanna, G., & Mason, H

    Rao, Y. K., Del Zanna, G., & Mason, H. E. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1383, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac128

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac128 2022

  55. [55]

    1981, SoPh, 69, 27, doi: 10.1007/BF00151253

    Roberts, B. 1981, SoPh, 69, 27, doi: 10.1007/BF00151253

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00151253 1981

  56. [56]

    D., & Veltri, P

    Salem, C., Mangeney, A., Bale, S. D., & Veltri, P. 2009, ApJ, 702, 537, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/537

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/702/1/537 2009

  57. [57]

    2019, Science, 366, 890, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2796

    Samanta, T., Tian, H., Yurchyshyn, V., et al. 2019, Science, 366, 890, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2796

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaw2796 2019

  58. [58]

    Schekochihin, A. A. 2022, Journal of Plasma Physics, 88, 155880501, doi: 10.1017/S0022377822000721

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377822000721 2022

  59. [59]

    Sharma, R., & Morton, R. J. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1301, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02070-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02070-1 2023

  60. [60]

    Shetye, J., Verwichte, E., Stangalini, M., & Doyle, J. G. 2021, ApJ, 921, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1a12

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1a12 2021

  61. [61]

    Soler, R., Terradas, J., Oliver, R., & Ballester, J. L. 2019, ApJ, 871, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf64c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf64c 2019

  62. [62]

    2001, Planet

    Sorriso-Valvo, L., Carbone, V., Giuliani, P., et al. 2001, Planet. Space Sci., 49, 1193, doi: 10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00060-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0032-0633(01)00060-5 2001

  63. [63]

    Tajfirouze, E., Morton, R., & Young, P. R. 2025, ApJ, 982, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb9e5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb9e5 2025

  64. [64]

    R., & Zeighami, S

    Tavabi, E., Koutchmy, S., Ajabshirizadeh, A., Ahangarzadeh Maralani, A. R., & Zeighami, S. 2015, A&A, 573, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423385

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423385 2015

  65. [65]

    O., Morton, R

    Thurgood, J. O., Morton, R. J., & McLaughlin, J. A. 2014, ApJL, 790, L2, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/790/1/L2

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/790/1/l2 2014

  66. [66]

    W., Wang, T., et al

    Tian, H., McIntosh, S. W., Wang, T., et al. 2012, ApJ, 759, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/144

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/2/144 2012

  67. [67]

    E., Cranmer, S

    Tian, H., DeLuca, E. E., Cranmer, S. R., et al. 2014, Science, 346, 1255711, doi: 10.1126/science.1255711

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1255711 2014

  68. [68]

    W., Keil, S

    Tomczyk, S., McIntosh, S. W., Keil, S. L., et al. 2007, Science, 317, 1192, doi: 10.1126/science.1143304 van Ballegooijen, A. A., Asgari-Targhi, M., Cranmer, S. R., & DeLuca, E. E. 2011, ApJ, 736, 3, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/3 van der Holst, B., Sokolov, I. V., Meng, X., et al. 2014, ApJ, 782, 81, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/81 Van Doorsselaere, T., ...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1143304 2007

  69. [69]

    E., Avrett, E

    Vernazza, J. E., Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 1981, ApJS, 45, 635, doi: 10.1086/190731

    work page doi:10.1086/190731 1981

  70. [70]

    G., & Maruca, B

    Verscharen, D., Klein, K. G., & Maruca, B. A. 2019, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 16, 5, doi: 10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0 2019

  71. [71]

    1967, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 15, 70, doi: 10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901

    Welch, P. 1967, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 15, 70, doi: 10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901

    work page doi:10.1109/tau.1967.1161901 1967

  72. [72]

    Wentzel, D. G. 1979, ApJ, 227, 319, doi: 10.1086/156732

    work page doi:10.1086/156732 1979

  73. [73]

    L., & Noyes, R

    Withbroe, G. L., & Noyes, R. W. 1977, ARA&A, 15, 363, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.15.090177.002051

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.15.090177.002051 1977