Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Giant coercivity and enhanced intrinsic anomalous Hall effect at vanishing magnetization in a compensated kagome ferrimagnet

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cr doping the kagome ferrimagnet TbMn6Sn6 drives it toward magnetic compensation, where a coercive field exceeding 14 T and an enhanced intrinsic anomalous Hall effect coexist at vanishing magnetization.

desk verdict Solid experimental demonstration of doping-controlled compensation and >14 T coercivity in a kagome ferrimagnet, but the AHE-enhancement mechanism is oversold by a rigid-band comparison that the authors' own substitution calculations contradict. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04560 v1 pith:AMC5Z4QB submitted 2025-02-06 cond-mat.str-el

Jonathan M. DeStefano , Elliott Rosenberg , Guodong Ren , Yongbin Lee , Zhenhua Ning , Olivia Peek , Kamal Harrison , Saiful I. Khondaker
show 4 more authors
Liqin Ke Igor I. Mazin Juan Carlos Idrobo Jiun-Haw Chu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords kagomeferrimagnetmagneticcompensationanomalousHalleffectgiantcoercivityBerrycurvatureTbMn6Sn6chemicaldopingspintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that chemical doping can turn the kagome ferrimagnet TbMn6Sn6 into a compensated ferrimagnet—net magnetization near zero—while preserving, and even enhancing, the intrinsic anomalous Hall effect. That combination matters for spintronics because a compensated ferrimagnet with a large anomalous Hall voltage would be easy to read (the Hall signal is finite at zero field) and hard to erase (coercive fields exceed 14 T near compensation). The paper reports Cr substitution on the Mn site as the tuning knob: it drives magnetic compensation at $x^* \approx 0.43$, produces giant coercivity at low temperature, and increases the intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity, which the authors attribute to a Fermi-level shift that brings the system to Berry-curvature hot spots. If correct, the result validates chemical doping as a route to compensated ferrimagnets with large intrinsic Hall response and settles the origin of the anomalous Hall effect in TbMn6Sn6 in favor of multi-band anti-crossings rather than a single gapped Dirac point.

What carries the argument

Three ingredients carry the argument. First, the parent compound TbMn6Sn6: a kagome ferrimagnet with Mn kagome layers antiferromagnetically coupled to Tb triangular layers, whose moments (2.4 $\mu_B$ on Mn, 8.6 $\mu_B$ on Tb) nearly cancel when Cr replaces Mn. Second, the decomposition of the anomalous Hall conductivity $\sigma_{\rm AH} = a\sigma_{xx}^2 + c + d\sigma_{xx}^{-1}$, where $c$ is the intrinsic Berry-curvature term, $a$ the extrinsic skew-scattering and side-jump term, and the $d\sigma_{xx}^{-1}$ term captures spin-fluctuation contributions; this lets the paper extract the intrinsic part's doping dependence. Third, the rigid-band calculation: shifting the Fermi level of TbMn6Sn6 to simulate hole doping reproduces the measured rise in $\sigma^{\rm int}_{\rm AH}$, which the paper reads as evidence that multiple band anti-crossings with large Berry curvature, spread across the Brillouin zone, drive the effect.

What would settle it

Compute the intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity with explicit Cr-substituted supercells at $x = 1/3$ and $x = 1/2$ and compare with the rigid-band curve in Fig. 7d: if the supercell values do not track the rigid-band enhancement, the Fermi-level explanation fails. Experimentally, a measurement of the intrinsic anomalous Hall contribution at $x > 0.5$, where the rigid-band approximation is known to break down for the magnetism, would also discriminate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Cr substitution on the Mn site of the kagome ferrimagnet TbMn6Sn6 produces a chemically compensated ferrimagnet: the transition-metal moment is reduced so that near $x^* \approx 0.43$ the net magnetization almost vanishes, while the material remains a hard magnet with out-of-plane uniaxial anisotropy. In this compensated state, the coercive field diverges and exceeds 14 T at low temperature, and the anomalous Hall resistivity remains large. Fitting the conductivity-dependent Hall data separates an intrinsic contribution that grows with Cr doping from extrinsic and spin-fluctuation terms. The paper attributes the growth to hole doping shifting the Fermi level to regions of large Berry curvature, and it takes the agreement with a rigid-band calculation as unambiguous confirmation that multiple anti-crossing features, rather than a single two-dimensional Dirac point, generate the intrinsic anomalous Hall effect.

Load-bearing premise

The central explanation relies on the assumption that replacing Mn with Cr only shifts the Fermi level without otherwise changing the electronic bands; the paper's own substitution calculations find this assumption already fails for the magnetic structure above $x = 1/6$, so the agreement between the measured intrinsic Hall conductivity and the rigid-band curve could be a coincidence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Near the compensation composition $x^* \approx 0.43$, the coercive field $\mu_0 H_c$ exceeds 14 T at 2.5 K, the largest value reported in a crystalline material, making the magnetic state difficult to erase.
  • The intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity extracted from scaling analysis increases substantially with Cr doping, while the extrinsic contribution grows with the opposite sign, so the enhancement is hidden in the raw total $|\sigma_{\rm AH}|$.
  • Temperature provides a second compensation route: at $x = 0.49$ the magnetization crosses zero at $T^* = 114$ K and the anomalous Hall resistivity reverses sign.
  • The match between the measured intrinsic Hall conductivity and the rigid-band hole-doping curve supports the conclusion that the intrinsic anomalous Hall effect comes from multiple band anti-crossings across the Brillouin zone rather than a single gapped Dirac point.
  • A two-step thermal protocol is demonstrated: polarize the moments at high temperature where $H_c$ is small, cool to 2.5 K to lock the state, and read the state with the large anomalous Hall voltage.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Fermi-level mechanism is right, the same enhancement should appear for other hole dopants or applied pressure that lowers the electron count; a systematic survey would separate the rigid-band effect from the disorder and Cr-clustering effects described in the paper.
  • The opposite signs of the intrinsic and extrinsic Hall terms mean the total $|\sigma_{\rm AH}|$ is nearly doping-independent; an application-focused study should therefore measure the scaling decomposition rather than the raw Hall resistivity, or the intrinsic enhancement will be missed.
  • The supplement's write/read protocol—polarize near the spin-reorientation temperature, cool to lock the state, read the Hall voltage—implies a non-volatile memory state stable against fields above 14 T; cycling endurance and switching-speed tests would be the natural next experiment.
  • The DFT finding of antiferromagnetic Cr-Cr chains suggests a neutron-scattering check on crystals near $x \approx 1/3$; observing such short-range order would verify the microscopic moment-reduction mechanism beyond the rigid-band picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined magnetization, magnetotransport, STEM/EELS, and DFT study of Cr-substituted kagome ferrimagnet TbMn6Sn6. It shows that Cr doping reduces the transition-metal sublattice moment, driving the system toward magnetic compensation near x* ≈ 0.43, where the low-temperature coercive field exceeds 14 T. For x = 0.49, a temperature-induced compensation point at T* ≈ 114 K is identified, with sign reversal of the anomalous Hall effect. The authors fit the anomalous Hall conductivity with σ_AH = a σ_xx^2 + c + d/σ_xx and extract an intrinsic AHC c that grows with x. They compare this with a rigid-band-shift DFT calculation of the intrinsic AHC and conclude that Cr doping shifts the Fermi level to Berry-curvature hot spots, thereby enhancing the intrinsic AHE. A two-state write/read proof-of-concept is presented in Supplementary Note 6.

Significance. If the mechanism claim were fully established, the work would be significant: it would demonstrate chemical doping as a simultaneous tuning knob for magnetic compensation, giant coercivity, and enhanced intrinsic AHE, which is attractive for spintronics. The paper has notable strengths: direct magnetization and Hall measurements convincingly show compensation and a coercive field exceeding the 14 T instrument limit; the STEM/EELS and EDX characterization documents homogeneous Cr substitution; the DFT calculation of the intrinsic AHC is a genuine first-principles computation and is not fitted to the experimental AHE data, so there is no circularity problem of the kind sometimes found in scaling analyses. However, the quantitative claim of enhanced intrinsic AHE is model-dependent, and the rigid-band interpretation is challenged by the paper's own substitution DFT calculations. The compensation and giant-coercivity results are likely to stand independently of the AHE-mechanism interpretation, but the stronger claim about Fermi-level tuning requires further support.

major comments (2)
  1. [VI (Fig. 7c,d); Supplementary Note 2] The central mechanistic claim that Cr doping enhances the intrinsic AHC by shifting the Fermi level rests on a rigid-band comparison that the paper's own substitution calculations show to break down at precisely the doping concentrations where the enhancement is largest. Supplementary Note 2 states that the virtual-crystal/rigid-band model "becomes unsuitable for describing the magnetic structure" above x = 1/6, and the explicit substitution calculations find antiferromagnetic Cr–Cr coupling and a non-monotonic moment evolution with x, in contrast to the virtual-crystal result. Yet Table I and Fig. 7c use x = 0.28 and x = 0.49, well above x = 1/6. Since the intrinsic AHC is computed from the Bloch states of the actual magnetic structure, the agreement between the fitted c parameter and the rigid-band curve does not by itself confirm a Fermi-level mechanism; it could be coincidental or could reflect substitution-induced changes to the band structure and magnetic order. The sentence in Section VI that the agreement "unambiguously confirms" the multi-anticros sing origin is therefore stronger than the evidence allows. I ask the authors to compute the intrinsic AHC for the explicit substitution configurations of Supplementary Note 2, or to temper the claim to an empirical enhancement that is consistent with, but not uniquely predicted by, the rigid-band calculation.
  2. [V, Eq. (1); Table I; Supplementary Note 4] The extraction of the intrinsic AHC c from experiment relies entirely on the empirical three-parameter scaling form σ_AH = a σ_xx^2 + c + d/σ_xx. The d/σ_xx term, which the text describes as "tentatively associated with spin fluctuations," contributes at the same order as c over the measured conductivity range. For example, for x = 0.49, d = −3.90 × 10^6 (Ω cm)^−2, so d/σ_xx ≈ −390 (Ω cm)^−1 for σ_xx ≈ 10^4 (Ω cm)^−1, i.e., comparable to the reported c = 1107 (Ω cm)^−1. This creates a substantial degeneracy between c and d, and the cross-check in Supplementary Note 4 uses an equivalent cubic term in ρ_AH, so it does not independently validate the decomposition. The trend in c with x appears real despite the large relative errors (e.g., c = 562 ± 177 for x = 0.28), but identifying c specifically with the intrinsic Berry-curvature contribution is model-dependent. I recommend reporting the full covariance of the fit parameters, showing the stability of c under two-parameter fits, or providing an independent estimate of the intrinsic AHC.
minor comments (5)
  1. [V, Fig. 7c] The caption states that σ_int^AH and σ_ext^AH are shown at 50 K, but Table I does not specify the temperature at which the fits were performed; please clarify whether Fig. 7c uses the Table I values or a separate 50 K fit.
  2. [VI, Fig. 7d] Please specify exactly how the rigid-band Fermi-level shift is converted to the Cr concentration x plotted in Fig. 7d; without this mapping the quantitative agreement between Fig. 7c and Fig. 7d cannot be assessed.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] There is a typo in the Fig. 2 caption: "spin reoirentation" should be "spin reorientation."
  4. [Supplementary Note 5, Fig. S10 caption] The caption says "xEDX as a function for xnom"; this should read "as a function of xnom."
  5. [Abstract and Section IV] The abstract says the material exhibits a finite anomalous Hall effect at zero magnetic field, but for nearly compensated samples at base temperature the hysteresis cannot be traced because Hc > 14 T, and the zero-field AHE is observed only after field cooling. Please make this caveat explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central AHC comparison is a genuine first-principles check, though the paper overstates the rigid-band agreement.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is: measure magnetization and Hall resistivity; compute σ_AH; fit σ_AH vs σ_xx to Eq. 1 to separate an 'intrinsic' coefficient c; and compare c(x) with a DFT calculation of σ_int^AH obtained by rigid-band hole doping (Fig. 7d). The DFT curve is computed from Wannier-interpolated Berry curvature via Eq. 2 with no parameter fitted to the experimental AHE data, so comparing the extracted c with this curve is a legitimate test and not a fit renamed as a prediction. The scenario being tested is indeed supported by Refs [12,13,21], which include overlapping authors, but the cited results are parameter-free DFT computations rather than fitted values, and the present paper recomputes the AHC (Fig. 7d) rather than importing the curve solely from those citations. The functional form in Eq. 1, including the d/σ_xx term, is an ansatz inherited from Ref [13]; this makes the extracted c model-dependent, but the same form was introduced in prior work and is cross-checked in Supplementary Note 4 using resistivity-form fits, so the central claim does not reduce to its own input. The M′ construction in Section III crosses zero at x* by definition, but the paper states this explicitly ('by construction'), and the linear slope used to infer the moment reduction per Cr is empirical and checked against neutron data. The most significant weakness is that Supplementary Note 2 states that for x > 1/6 the rigid-band model 'becomes unsuitable for describing the magnetic structure,' which undermines the Section VI claim that agreement between Fig. 7c and Fig. 7d 'unambiguously confirms' the Fermi-level mechanism at the higher dopings. That is a validity/overclaim concern, not a circularity: the DFT calculation remains independent of the fitted c. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no load-bearing conclusion is forced by self-citation. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claims rest on a three-parameter scaling fit (a, c, d) for each doping, a linear extrapolation of moments, and a rigid-band comparison whose validity the paper itself limits to x = 1/6. No new physical entities are introduced; the non-standard spin-fluctuation term is a phenomenological fitting term from prior work by the same authors.

free parameters (5)
  • a(x): skew-scattering coefficient = varies from -7.48e-9 to -7.86e-6 Ohm-cm across x (Table I)
    Fitted in sigma_AH = a sigma_xx^2 + c + d/sigma_xx; changes sign and grows with doping.
  • c(x): intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity = 186 to 1107 S/cm (Table I)
    Fitted intercept assigned to intrinsic AHC; central claimed enhancement.
  • d(x): spin-fluctuation coefficient = -3.26e5 to -3.90e6 (Ohm-cm)^-2 (Table I)
    Extra 1/sigma_xx term added to improve fits; attributed to Tb spin fluctuations.
  • Moment reduction slope = 1.8 mu_B per Cr
    Linear fit of M' vs x (Fig. 3b); used to infer Cr moment 0.6 mu_B.
  • Tb 4f Hubbard U = 10 eV
    DFT+U parameter for Tb 4f electrons (Methods); not fitted to this data but chosen from practice.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Berry curvature formula sigma_alpha_beta = -e^2/hbar * integral f(E_nk) Omega_n,alpha_beta(k) dk
    Standard Kubo formula (Eq. 2) used for all intrinsic AHC calculations.
  • domain assumption The ferrimagnetic ordering of TbMn6Sn6 persists with Cr doping, and the Tb moment stays near 8.6 mu_B
    Extends low-x neutron results [17] to x up to 0.55 without new high-x neutron data.
  • standard math sigma_AH = -rho_AH/(rho_xx,0^2 + rho_AH^2)
    Standard two-band conversion used to obtain AHC from measured resistivities.
  • domain assumption Coercivity scales as H_c proportional to 1/M via domain depinning
    Used to explain the divergence of H_c near compensation; references [21,22].
  • ad hoc to paper Rigid-band approximation maps Cr doping to a Fermi-level shift for the intrinsic AHC
    Used in Section VI and Fig. 7d; Supplementary Note 2 shows it fails for magnetization above x = 1/6.
  • ad hoc to paper The 1/sigma_xx term in the AHE scaling represents spin fluctuations
    Introduced in the authors' Ref [13] to fit the parent compound; adopted here to separate intrinsic from extrinsic AHE.
  • ad hoc to paper Data near T* and below T* are handled by exclusion and sign flips in fits
    Supplementary Note 4; these choices influence the fitted parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Giant coercivity and enhanced intrinsic anomalous Hall effect at vanishing magnetization in a compensated kagome ferrimagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AMC5Z4QB

@misc{pith2026250204560,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Giant coercivity and enhanced intrinsic anomalous Hall effect at vanishing magnetization in a compensated kagome ferrimagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AMC5Z4QB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04560}
}
abstract

Ferrimagnets that can be driven to magnetic compensation show promise for use in spintronics as they exhibit a finite anomalous Hall effect at zero magnetic field without having a significant magnetic moment. Compensated ferrimagnet spintronic devices with both a large anomalous Hall effect and a high coercivity would be simultaneously easy to read and difficult to erase. The kagome ferrimagnet TbMn$_6$Sn$_6$ has been reported to host a large intrinsic anomalous Hall effect. Here, we demonstrate that doping the Mn sites with Cr drives the system towards magnetic compensation. For nearly compensated compositions at low temperatures, giant coercive fields exceeding 14 T are observed. Additionally, Cr doping significantly enhances the intrinsic anomalous Hall effect, which can be attributed to a shift in the Fermi level. Our results extend the range of unique magnetic states observed in kagome materials, demonstrating that chemical doping is an effective strategy to tune and realize these states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04560 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Doping-induced Spin Reorientation in Kagome Magnet TmMn6Sn6

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Gallium doping gradually reorients magnetism in TmMn6Sn6 from easy-plane to easy-axis, with the reorientation temperature rising until it merges with the magnetic ordering temperature near x=2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Finley and L

    J. Finley and L. Liu, Spintronics with compen- sated ferrimagnets, Applied Physics Letters 116, 110501 (2020), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5144076/20002008/110501 1 1.5144076.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5144076/20002008/110501 2020

  2. [2]

    S. K. Kim, G. S. D. Beach, K.-J. Lee, T. Ono, T. Rasing, and H. Yang, Ferrimagnetic spintronics, Nature Materials 21, 24 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    H.-A. Zhou, T. Xu, H. Bai, and W. Jiang, Efficient Spin- tronics with Fully Compensated Ferrimagnets, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 90, 081006 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Physical Review X 12, 040002 (2022)

    I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Physical Review X 12, 040002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Hansen, C

    P. Hansen, C. Clausen, G. Much, M. Rosenkranz, and K. Witter, Magnetic and magneto-optical prop- erties of rare-earth transition-metal alloys contain- ing Gd, Tb, Fe, Co, Journal of Applied Physics 66, 756 (1989), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/66/2/756/18624989/756 1 online.pdf

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. B. A. Jalil, S. G. Tan, and S. Murakami, Gauge fields in spintronics, Journal of Applied Physics 110, 121301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    M. Li, Q. Wang, G. Wang, Z. Yuan, W. Song, R. Lou, Z. Liu, Y. Huang, Z. Liu, H. Lei, Z. Yin, and S. Wang, Dirac cone, flat band and saddle point in kagome magnet YMn6Sn6, Nature Communications 12, 3129 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    S. Peng, Y. Han, G. Pokharel, J. Shen, Z. Li, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, B. R. Ortiz, Y. Luo, H. Li, M. Guo, B. Wang, S. Cui, Z. Sun, Z. Qiao, S. D. Wilson, and J. He, Realizing Kagome Band Structure in Two-Dimensional Kagome Surface States of RV6Sn6 (R = Gd , Ho), Phys- ical Review Letters 127, 266401 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Hu, X. Wu, Y. Yang, S. Gao, N. C. Plumb, A. P. Schnyder, W. Xie, J. Ma, and M. Shi, Tunable topological Dirac surface states and van Hove singularities in kagome metal GdV6Sn6, Science Advances 8, eadd2024 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    J.-X. Yin, W. Ma, T. A. Cochran, X. Xu, S. S. Zhang, H.-J. Tien, N. Shumiya, G. Cheng, K. Jiang, B. Lian, Z. Song, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, D. Multer, M. Litske- vich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, B. Swidler, H. Zhou, H. Lin, T. Neupert, Z. Wang, N. Yao, T.-R. Chang, S. Jia, and M...

    2020

  3. [11]

    Zhang, J

    H. Zhang, J. Koo, C. Xu, M. Sretenovic, B. Yan, and X. Ke, Exchange-biased topological transverse thermo- electric effects in a Kagome ferrimagnet, Nature Com- munications 13, 1091 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Y. Lee, R. Skomski, X. Wang, P. P. Orth, Y. Ren, B. Kang, A. K. Pathak, A. Kutepov, B. N. Harmon, R. J. McQueeney, I. I. Mazin, and L. Ke, Interplay between magnetism and band topology in the kagome magnets RMn6Sn6, Phys. Rev. B 108, 045132 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    D. C. Jones, S. Das, H. Bhandari, X. Liu, P. Siegfried, M. P. Ghimire, S. S. Tsirkin, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Origin of spin reorientation and intrin- sic anomalous Hall effect in the kagome ferrimagnet TbMn6Sn6, Physical Review B 110, 115134 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Bhandari, Z

    H. Bhandari, Z. Ning, P.-H. Chang, P. E. Siegfried, R. B. Regmi, M. E. Gazzah, A. V. Davydov, A. G. Oliver, L. Ke, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Three- dimensional nature of anomalous Hall conductivity in YMn6Sn6−xGax, x ˜ 0.55 (2024), arXiv:2411.12134 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    B. C. El Idrissi, G. Venturini, B. Malaman, and D. Fruchart, Magnetic structures of TbMn 6Sn6 and 12 HoMn6Sn6 compounds from neutron diffraction study, Journal of the Less Common Metals 175, 143 (1991)

    1991

  8. [16]

    S. X. M. Riberolles, T. J. Slade, R. L. Dally, P. M. Sarte, B. Li, T. Han, H. Lane, C. Stock, H. Bhandari, N. J. Ghimire, D. L. Abernathy, P. C. Canfield, J. W. Lynn, B. G. Ueland, and R. J. McQueeney, Orbital character of the spin-reorientation transition in TbMn6Sn6, Nature ...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Schobinger-Papamantellos, G

    P. Schobinger-Papamantellos, G. Andr´ e, J. Rodriguez- Carvajal, H. Duijn, and K. Buschow, Magnetic ordering in TbMn6−xCrxSn6 (x=1, 2) compounds studied by neu- tron diffraction and magnetic measurements, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 306, 47 (2000)

    2000

  10. [18]

    I. Fita, R. Puzniak, A. Wisniewski, and V. Markovich, Spin switching and unusual exchange bias in the single- crystalline GdCrO 3 compensated ferrimagnet, Physical Review B 100, 144426 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    D. M. Clatterbuck and K. A. Gschneidner, Magnetic properties of RMn 6Sn6 (R=Tb, Ho, Er, Tm, Lu) single crystals, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 207, 78 (1999)

    1999

  12. [20]

    Schobinger-Papamantellos, J

    P. Schobinger-Papamantellos, J. Rodr´ ıguez-Carvajal, and K. H. J. Buschow, Atomic disorder and canted ferri- magnetism in the TbCr6Ge6 compound. A neutron study, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 255, 67 (1997)

    1997

  13. [21]

    A. K. Nayak, M. Nicklas, S. Chadov, P. Khuntia, C. Shekhar, A. Kalache, M. Baenitz, Y. Skourski, V. K. Guduru, A. Puri, U. Zeitler, J. M. D. Coey, and C. Felser, Design of compensated ferrimagnetic Heusler alloys for giant tunable exchange bias, Nature Materials 14, 679 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    L. Zhu, L. Zhu, Q. Liu, and X. Lin, Giant coercivity, resis- tivity upturn, and anomalous Hall effect in ferrimagnetic FeTb, Physical Review B 108, 014420 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    E. A. Gorbachev, E. S. Kozlyakova, L. A. Trusov, A. E. Sleptsova, M. A. Zykin, and P. E. Kazin, Design of mod- ern magnetic materials with giant coercivity, Russian Chemical Reviews 90, 1287 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Rosenberg, J

    E. Rosenberg, J. M. DeStefano, Y. Guo, J. S. Oh, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, R. J. Birgeneau, Y. Lee, L. Ke, M. Yi, and J.-H. Chu, Uniaxial ferromagnetism in the kagome metal TbV6Sn6, Physical Review B 106, 115139 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    T. R. McGuire, R. J. Gambino, and R. C. Taylor, Hall effect in amorphous thin-film magnetic alloys, Journal of Applied Physics 48, 2965 (1977)

    1977

  18. [26]

    Y. Tian, L. Ye, and X. Jin, Proper Scaling of the Anoma- lous Hall Effect, Physical Review Letters 103, 087206 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    P. C. Canfield, T. Kong, U. S. Kaluarachchi, and N. H. Jo, Use of frit-disc crucibles for rou- tine and exploratory solution growth of single crys- talline samples, Philosophical Magazine 96, 84 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2015.1122248

    2016

  20. [28]

    Krivanek, G

    O. Krivanek, G. Corbin, N. Dellby, B. Elston, R. Keyse, M. Murfitt, C. Own, Z. Szilagyi, and J. Woodruff, An electron microscope for the aberration-corrected era, Ul- tramicroscopy 108, 179 (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, and J. Luitz, Wien2k: An augmented plane wave plus local orbitals program for calculating crystal properties, Tech- nische Universit¨ at Wien, Wien28 (2001)

    2001

  22. [30]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, F. Tran, R. Laskowski, G. K. H. Madsen, and L. D. Marks, WIEN2k: An APW+lo pro- gram for calculating the properties of solids, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 074101 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  24. [32]

    V. I. Anisimov, I. V. Solovyev, M. A. Korotin, M. T. Czy˙ zyk, and G. A. Sawatzky, Density-functional theory and NiO photoemission spectra, Physical Review B 48, 16929 (1993)

    1993

  25. [33]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Physical Review B 56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  26. [34]

    Souza, N

    I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally lo- calized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands, Physical Review B 65, 035109 (2001)

    2001

  27. [35]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Computer Physics Communications 185, 2309 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    X. Wang, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Ab initio calculation of the anomalous Hall conductivity by Wannier interpolation, Physical Review B 74, 195118 (2006)

    2006

  30. [38]

    Giant coercivity and enhanced intrinsic anomalous Hall effect at vanishing magnetization in a compensated kagome ferrimagnet

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, Journal of Applied Crystallography 44, 1272 (2011). Supplementary Information for “Giant coercivity and enhanced intrinsic anomalous Hall effect at vanishing magnetiz...

    2011 arXiv

  31. [39]

    The blue squares represent the total magnetic moment of the lowest energy configuration as a function of x

    At this doping level, the rigid band model becomes unsuitable for describing the magnetic structure. The blue squares represent the total magnetic moment of the lowest energy configuration as a function of x. These calculations were performed under the hypothesis that the magn...

  32. [40]

    locked in

    composition, there are 4 (3) Mn sites and 2 (3) Cr sites. The magnetic moments exhibit variations depending on the specific atomic sites. FIG. S3. Calculated magnetic configurations. Top: The configurations of the lowest-energy states (config. 1) for x = 1 3 (left) and x = 1 2...

    2024

  33. [41]

    J.-X. Yin, W. Ma, T. A. Cochran, X. Xu, S. S. Zhang, H.-J. Tien, N. Shumiya, G. Cheng, K. Jiang, B. Lian, Z. Song, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, B. Swidler, H. Zhou, H. Lin, T. Neupert, Z. Wang, N. Yao, T.-R. Chang, S. Jia, and M. ...

    2020

  34. [42]

    D. C. Jones, S. Das, H. Bhandari, X. Liu, P. Siegfried, M. P. Ghimire, S. S. Tsirkin, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Origin of spin reorientation and intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in the kagome ferrimagnet TbMn 6Sn6, Physical Review B 110, 115134 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    S. X. M. Riberolles, T. J. Slade, D. L. Abernathy, G. E. Granroth, B. Li, Y. Lee, P. C. Canfield, B. G. Ueland, L. Ke, and R. J. McQueeney, Low-Temperature Competing Magnetic Energy Scales in the Topological Ferrimagnet TbMn 6Sn6, Physical Review X 12, 021043 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Demirtas and A

    S. Demirtas and A. R. Koymen, Coercivity and exchange bias near the compensation temper- ature for inhomogeneous Fe/Gd ferrimagnets, Journal of Applied Physics 95, 4949 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    Fowley, K

    C. Fowley, K. Rode, Y.-C. Lau, N. Thiyagarajah, D. Betto, K. Borisov, G. Atcheson, E. Kam- pert, Z. Wang, Y. Yuan, S. Zhou, J. Lindner, P. Stamenov, J. M. D. Coey, and A. M. Deac, Magnetocrystalline anisotropy and exchange probed by high-field anomalous Hall effect in fully co...

    2018

  38. [46]

    Onoda, N

    S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Quantum transport theory of anomalous electric, thermoelectric, and thermal Hall effects in ferromagnets, Physical Review B77, 165103 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    Y. Tian, L. Ye, and X. Jin, Proper Scaling of the Anomalous Hall Effect, Physical Review Letters 103, 087206 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    D. C. Jones, S. Das, H. Bhandari, X. Liu, P. Siegfried, M. P. Ghimire, S. S. Tsirkin, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Origin of spin reorientation and intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in the kagome ferrimagnet TbMn 6Sn6 (2022), arxiv:2203.17246 [cond-mat]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    R. J. P´ erez and B. Sundman, Thermodynamic assessment of the Cr-Sn binary system, Calphad 25, 59 (2001)

    2001

  42. [50]

    Aljarrah, S

    M. Aljarrah, S. Obeidat, R. H. Fouad, M. Rababah, A. Almagableh, and A. Itradat, Ther- modynamic calculations of the Mn–Sn, Mn–Sr and Mg–Mn–(Sn, Sr) systems, IET Science, Measurement & Technology 9, 681 (2015). 17

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.