Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 51 references

Unified Lagrangian Framework for Galaxy Clustering: Consistent Modeling of Bias, Redshift-Space Distortions, and Reconstruction

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes a unified perturbative framework in which one power-spectrum formula describes dark matter, biased tracers, redshift-space distortions, and reconstructed fields.

desk verdict The supplied full text is a different paper entirely, so the ambitious ULPT claims can't be checked; the abstract looks like a serious framework but the review file is corrupted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17331 v2 pith:AN6R5U6O submitted 2025-08-24 astro-ph.CO

Naonori Sugiyama This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords unifiedLagrangianperturbationtheorygalaxyclusteringpowerspectrumredshift-spacedistortionsbaryonacousticoscillationsBAOreconstructionbiasGalileonoperators
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes Unified Lagrangian Perturbation Theory (ULPT), a single perturbative framework for galaxy clustering that treats three coordinate mappings on the same footing: the Lagrangian-to-Eulerian displacement, the real-to-redshift-space mapping from peculiar velocities, and the remapping from pre- to post-reconstruction fields. Its central move is to split the density field into a Jacobian deviation, which carries intrinsic growth, and a displacement-mapping effect, which carries large-scale convective distortions. With that split the resummation of long-wavelength (IR) modes becomes exact and analytic, BAO damping is described by a consistent Gaussian factor, and the residual structure of cross-spectra between fields with different IR behavior is fixed. The payoff, if correct, is one unified power-spectrum expression that applies to dark matter, biased tracers, redshift-space distortions, and reconstructed fields, with a natural Galileon operator basis for nonlocal bias and no need for renormalization counterterms.

What carries the argument

The central object is the decomposition of the density field into the Jacobian deviation $J-1$ of the coordinate transformation from Lagrangian to Eulerian space and the displacement-mapping effect from the displacement vector $\mathbf{\Psi}$. ULPT's innovation is to treat the real-to-redshift-space velocity mapping and the pre-to-post-reconstruction remapping as the same kind of coordinate remapping, so the same exact IR resummation applies to all. The Galileon-type operators that appear when the displacement gradients are expanded form the complete operator basis for nonlocal bias, which is what removes the need for explicit renormalization of the bias parameters.

What would settle it

Run a large N-body simulation, identify a halo sample, and compare the measured redshift-space power spectrum and the cross-spectrum between pre- and post-reconstruction density fields with the ULPT closed form down to $k \sim 0.3\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$. If a line-of-sight-dependent residual appears that the predicted Gaussian BAO damping cannot explain, the claimed completeness of the operator basis fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the density fluctuation of dark matter, a biased tracer, a redshift-space field, and a post-reconstruction field can be described by one unified power-spectrum expression within ULPT. The construction splits the density field into a Jacobian deviation $J-1$, which encodes intrinsic linear and nonlinear growth, and a displacement-mapping effect, which encodes large-scale convective distortions from the coordinate mapping $\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{q}+\mathbf{\Psi}$. This split makes the infrared resummation exact and analytic, gives a consistent Gaussian description of BAO damping, and fixes the residual structure of cross-spectra between fields that have different infrared behavior. The perturbative expansion automatically generates Galileon-type operators, giving a compact, physically motivated basis for nonlinear and nonlocal Lagrangian bias and a renormalization-free treatment of biased tracers.

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes that the density field can be split exactly into a growth part and a displacement part, and that every physical effect on the galaxy power spectrum is covered by the operator family this split produces.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One code path can predict the real-space, redshift-space, and post-reconstruction galaxy power spectra from the same ULPT kernel, eliminating the need to maintain separate treatments for each.
  • BAO damping in the power spectrum is predicted as a Gaussian factor controlled by the displacement variance, rather than put in by hand, and the exact IR cancellation removes the usual worries about resummation subtleties.
  • Cross-spectra between fields with different IR behavior, such as pre- and post-reconstruction density fields, have a fixed residual structure, which matters for survey analyses that combine both measurements.
  • The Galileon operator basis for bias means the galaxy bias expansion needs no explicit renormalization counterterms at the two-point level; the same basis can be carried into higher-order statistics.
  • Because the framework is unified, parameter constraints from galaxy clustering, RSD, and post-reconstruction BAO analyses can be combined consistently from the same model, reducing systematic mismatches in survey pipelines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Galileon basis truly closes the bias expansion, a natural test is to compare ULPT predictions against N-body mock catalogs at wavenumbers where nonlocal bias first appears; a missing operator would show up as a scale-dependent residual that grows with the line-of-sight angle in redshift space.
  • The same decomposition of a coordinate remapping into Jacobian deviation plus displacement effect could be applied to other remappings, such as the lensing deflection in galaxy-galaxy lensing, suggesting ULPT-style resummation for projected two-point statistics.
  • The exact IR cancellation implies that the ratio of pre- to post-reconstruction BAO damping envelopes is fixed by the displacement field alone; a measurement of that ratio in a current wide-area galaxy survey would be a sharp test of the framework independent of the full shape fit.
  • One implicit promise is that the unified formula reduces the number of nuisance parameters in RSD analyses; if that holds, the statistical power of future surveys on dark-energy parameters increases because fewer free counterterms must be marginalized.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The reviewed submission consists of an abstract for arXiv:2508.17331, titled 'Unified Lagrangian Framework for Galaxy Clustering: Consistent Modeling of Bias, Redshift-Space Distortions, and Reconstruction,' and a full-text file that is actually arXiv:2508.17333v2, 'Dynamical Tension Strings with Target Scale Symmetry producing DE, DM and why 4D?' by E. Guendelman. The abstract proposes Unified Lagrangian Perturbation Theory (ULPT), claiming a single perturbative framework for the power spectrum of dark matter, biased tracers, redshift-space distortions, and post-reconstruction fields, built on a decomposition of the density field into a Jacobian deviation and a displacement-mapping effect, with IR-safe resummation, exact IR cancellation, Gaussian BAO damping, and a Galileon-type operator basis for nonlinear and nonlocal Lagrangian bias. The supplied full text contains none of these ingredients; it is a review of dynamical string tensions, dark matter as strings with different tensions, and related topics. Consequently, the submission as received does not contain the derivations, definitions, or numerical tests needed to evaluate the abstract's claims.

Significance. The claimed unification would be significant if correct: existing treatments of real-space clustering, redshift-space distortions, and post-reconstruction fields are usually developed as separate resummation schemes, and a single IR-safe Lagrangian resummation with a controlled bias expansion could simplify and improve BAO analyses. The abstract's assertions are strong and falsifiable, especially the exact IR cancellation and the renormalization-free bias statement. However, the submitted material provides no equations, no comparison with existing standard perturbation theory or effective-field-theory results, no simulation tests, and no code; as a result, the significance cannot currently be assessed beyond the level of an unverified proposal.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, first paragraph; supplied full text] The central claim—a single unified expression for the power spectrum of dark matter, biased tracers, redshift-space distortions, and reconstructed fields—is asserted without any equation, derivation, or test in the reviewed material. The file labeled 'Full Text' is arXiv:2508.17333v2, a paper on dynamical tension strings, so none of the promised derivation is present in this submission. This omission is load-bearing because the correctness of the unified expression cannot be checked.
  2. [Abstract, second paragraph] The decomposition of the density field into a 'Jacobian deviation' and a 'displacement-mapping effect' is introduced verbally, but no definition or equation is given, and no derivation shows how this separation yields 'exact IR cancellation' and a 'consistent Gaussian description of BAO damping.' Without these steps, the advertised IR-safe resummation cannot be verified.
  3. [Abstract, second paragraph] The statement that Galileon-type operators form a complete basis for nonlinear and nonlocal Lagrangian bias, and that this enables a 'renormalization-free treatment of biased tracers,' is an unproved completeness and renormalization claim. No operator definition, completeness argument, or counterterm analysis is provided, so the claimed absence of renormalization cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Supplied full text, header] The full-text file carries the arXiv identifier 2508.17333v2, while the reviewed paper is arXiv:2508.17331; this identifier mismatch should be corrected before any further review.
  2. [Abstract, first paragraph] The abstract uses 'IR' for infrared without expansion; the main text should define this at first use, and the phrase 'the correct residual structure in cross spectra' would benefit from a precise definition of which residual terms are meant.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be identified because the supplied full text is a different paper; the advertised ULPT derivation is absent, so there is no equation chain to reduce.

full rationale

The submitted full text, arXiv:2508.17333v2 by Guendelman, is titled 'Dynamical Tension Strings with Target Scale Symmetry producing DE, DM and why 4D?' and contains no Lagrangian perturbation theory, no bias expansion, no redshift-space distortion kernels, and no power-spectrum formula. The abstract of arXiv:2508.17331 promises a unified expression for the power spectrum, but none of the claimed derivation is present in the supplied text. Under the requirement that circularity be demonstrated by quoting a specific reduction, such as an equation equal by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no such reduction can be exhibited. The absence of the derivation is a completeness or verification problem, not evidence of circularity. Therefore the honest finding is no detected circularity, with score 0, while explicitly noting that the central claim remains unverified in the supplied material.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract asserts a clean decomposition and a complete bias basis, but the supplied full text is from a different paper, so the ledger can only reflect abstract-level premises. A full audit requires the real manuscript, including any fitted bias coefficients or resummation scales.

assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The density field can be exactly decomposed into a Jacobian deviation term and a displacement-mapping effect term.
    Introduced in the abstract as a key structural feature; no proof or derivation visible in the abstract; the entire resummation argument depends on this split being exact and physical.
  • ad hoc to paper Galileon-type operators, generated by the ULPT expansion, form a complete basis for nonlinear and nonlocal Lagrangian bias.
    This is the premise that makes the bias treatment 'renormalization-free.' If the basis is incomplete, the derived power spectrum misses terms. It is asserted, not demonstrated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Standard Lagrangian perturbation theory is applicable to the scales targeted by the framework.
    The framework is perturbative; the abstract claims IR-safe resummation but does not state the convergence regime or the smallest scales treated, a standard domain assumption for such perturbation schemes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unified Lagrangian Framework for Galaxy Clustering: Consistent Modeling of Bias, Redshift-Space Distortions, and Reconstruction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AN6R5U6O

@misc{pith2026250817331,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unified Lagrangian Framework for Galaxy Clustering: Consistent Modeling of Bias, Redshift-Space Distortions, and Reconstruction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AN6R5U6O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17331}
}
read the original abstract

We present \emph{Unified Lagrangian Perturbation Theory} (ULPT), a perturbative framework for consistently modeling galaxy density fluctuations across real space, redshift space, and post-reconstruction fields. Unlike existing approaches that treat these cases separately, ULPT provides a single theoretical structure that incorporates the three essential coordinate mappings: the Lagrangian-to-Eulerian transformation, the real-to-redshift mapping induced by peculiar velocities, and the remapping from pre to post reconstruction. A key feature of our formulation is the explicit decomposition of the density field into two physically distinct components: the \emph{Jacobian deviation}, which encodes intrinsic linear and nonlinear growth, and the \emph{displacement-mapping effect}, which captures large-scale convective distortions. This separation enables a fully analytic and infrared (IR)-safe resummation, ensuring exact IR cancellation, a consistent Gaussian description of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) damping, and the correct residual structure in cross spectra between fields with distinct IR behavior. The perturbative expansion of ULPT naturally generates Galileon-type operators, thereby providing a compact and physically motivated operator basis for nonlinear and nonlocal Lagrangian bias, and allowing for a renormalization-free treatment of biased tracers. Within this framework, we derive a unified expression for the power spectrum that applies equally to dark matter, biased tracers, redshift-space distortions, and reconstructed fields. ULPT thus offers a robust and extensible foundation for precision modeling of large-scale structure, with potential extensions to higher-order statistics, such as the bispectrum, and to other two-point observables, such as galaxy--galaxy lensing.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Schwarz, V ols 1 and 2, World Scientific, 1985; M

    �Superstrings�, John H. Schwarz, V ols 1 and 2, World Scientific, 1985; M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and E. Witten, Superstring Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1987

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Guendelman, A.B

    E.I. Guendelman, A.B. Kaganovich, Phys.Rev.D55:5970-5980 (1997)

    1997

  3. [3]

    Guendelman, Mod.Phys.Lett.A14, 1043-1052 (1999)

    Scale invariance, new inflation and decaying Lambda terms, E.I. Guendelman, Mod.Phys.Lett.A14, 1043-1052 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    of Scale Invariance, E.I

    Inflation and Transition to a Slowly Accelerating Phase from S.S.B. of Scale Invariance, E.I. Guendelman, O. Katz, Class.Quant.Grav. 20 (2003) 1715-1728 • e-Print: gr-qc/0211095 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    Hehl, Phys.Rev.D 58 (1998) 084021 • e-Print: gr-qc/9712063 [gr-qc]

    Frank Gronwald, Uwe Muench, Alfredo Macias, Friedrich W. Hehl, Phys.Rev.D 58 (1998) 084021 • e-Print: gr-qc/9712063 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    47 (2015) 2, 10 • e-Print: 1408.5344 [gr-qc]

    Eduardo Guendelman, Ram ´on Herrera, Pedro Labrana, Emil Nissimov, Svetlana Pacheva, Gen.Rel.Grav. 47 (2015) 2, 10 • e-Print: 1408.5344 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Eduardo Guendelman, Douglas Singleton, Nattapong Yongram, JCAP 11 (2012) 044 • e-Print: 1205.1056 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Cordero, O.G

    R. Cordero, O.G. Miranda, M. Serrano-Crivelli, JCAP 07 (2019) 027 • e-Print: 1905.07352 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Eduardo Guendelman, Emil Nissimov, Svetlana Pacheva, Eur.Phys.J.C 75 (2015) 10, 472 • e- Print: 1508.02008 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Guendelman, E

    Conformally invariant gauge theory of three-branes in 6-D and the cosmological constant, E.I. Guendelman, E. Spallucci, Phys.Rev.D 70 (2004) 026003 • e-Print: hep-th/0311102 [hep- th], Conformally invariant brane world and the cosmological constant, E.I. Guendelman, Phys.Lett....

    2004 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Paganini, e-Print: 2303.16566 [gr-qc]

    Modified Measures as an Effective Theory for Causal Fermion Systems Felix Finster, Eduardo Guendelman, Claudio F. Paganini, e-Print: 2303.16566 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Signed General Coordinate Invariance, the Linde Universe Multiplication and Baby Universe Creation, Eduardo Guendelman, e-Print: 2304.04056 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Guen- delman, e-Print: 2304.09946 [hep-th]

    Strings versus Anti Strings in the inversion invariant or proper volume formulation E. Guen- delman, e-Print: 2304.09946 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Guendelman, Class.Quant.Grav

    E.I. Guendelman, Class.Quant.Grav. 17, 3673-3680 (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    Guendelman, A.B

    E.I. Guendelman, A.B. Kaganovich, E.Nissimov, S. Pacheva, Phys.Rev.D66:046003 (2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    Guendelman, Phys.Rev.D 63 (2001) 046006 • e-Print: hep-th/0006079 [hep-th]

    E.I. Guendelman, Phys.Rev.D 63 (2001) 046006 • e-Print: hep-th/0006079 [hep-th]

    2001 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Hitoshi Nishino, Subhash Rajpoot, Phys.Lett.B 736 (2014) 350-355 e-Print: 1411.3805 [hep- th]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Vulfs, E.I

    T.O. Vulfs, E.I. Guendelman, Annals Phys. 398 (2018) 138-145 • e-Print: 1709.01326 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Vulfs, E.I

    T.O. Vulfs, E.I. Guendelman, Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 34 (2019) 31, 1950204 • e-Print: 1802.06431 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Vulfs, Ben Gurion University Ph.D Thesis, (2021), arXiv:2103.08979

    T.O. Vulfs, Ben Gurion University Ph.D Thesis, (2021), arXiv:2103.08979

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Guendelman, Cosmology and Warped Space Times in Dynamical String Tension Theo- ries, e-Print: 2104.08875

    E.I. Guendelman, Cosmology and Warped Space Times in Dynamical String Tension Theo- ries, e-Print: 2104.08875

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Guendelman, Escaping the Hagedorn Temperature in Cosmology and Warped Spaces with Dynamical Tension Strings, e-Print: 2105.02279 [hep-th]

    E.I. Guendelman, Escaping the Hagedorn Temperature in Cosmology and Warped Spaces with Dynamical Tension Strings, e-Print: 2105.02279 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Oleg Andreev, JHEP 0903:098,2009, e.print: 0807.1017

    2009 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Guendel- man, Int.J.Mod.Phys.D 30 (2021) 14, 2142028 • e-Print: 2110.09199 [hep-th]

    Implications of the spectrum of dynamically generated string tension theories, E.I. Guendel- man, Int.J.Mod.Phys.D 30 (2021) 14, 2142028 • e-Print: 2110.09199 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Guendelman, Eur.Phys.J.C 82 (2022) 10, 857, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10837-5

    Life of the homogeneous and isotropic universe in dynamical string tension theories, E.I. Guendelman, Eur.Phys.J.C 82 (2022) 10, 857, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10837-5

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    2107.08005 [hep-th] , https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09646-z

    Light like segment compactification and braneworlds with dynamical string ten- sion, Eduardo Guendelman, Eur.Phys.J.C 81 (2021) 10, 886. 2107.08005 [hep-th] , https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09646-z

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Townsend, Phys.Lett.B 277 (1992) 285-288

    P.K. Townsend, Phys.Lett.B 277 (1992) 285-288

    1992

  20. [28]

    Bergshoeff, L.A.J

    E. Bergshoeff, L.A.J. London, P.K. Townsend, Class.Quant.Grav. 9 (1992) 2545-2556, Class. Quantum Grav. 9 (1992) 2545-2556 • e-Print: hep-th/9206026 [hep-th] 16 Eduardo Guendelman

    1992 arXiv

  21. [29]

    and Zumino,Phys

    Deser, S. and Zumino,Phys. Lett. B65 , 369, (1976)

    1976

  22. [30]

    Brink , L., Di Vechia, P and Howe, S. ,Phys. Lett. B65, 471 , (1976)

    1976

  23. [31]

    M,, ,Phys

    Polyakov, A. M,, ,Phys. Lett. B103 ,207, (1980)

    1980

  24. [32]

    Ansoldi, E

    S. Ansoldi, E. I. Guendelman, E. Spallucci, Mod.Phys.Lett.A 21 (2006) 2055-2065 • e-Print: hep-th/0510200 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  25. [33]

    458 (2023) 169466 • e-Print: 2308.09246 [gr-qc],

    Holomorphic general coordinate invariant modified measure gravitational theory, Eduardo Guendelman, Annals Phys. 458 (2023) 169466 • e-Print: 2308.09246 [gr-qc],

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Holomorphic gravity and its regularization of Locally Signed Coordinate Invariance Eduardo Guendelman, Essay awarded honorable mention in the 2024 Gravity Research Foundation Competition, published in Int.J.Mod.Phys.D 33 (2024) 15, 2441001 e-Print: 2402.00140 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    1 , Cambridge University Press (1998) ; some papers on strings with background fields are C

    Joseph Polchinski, String Theory, vol. 1 , Cambridge University Press (1998) ; some papers on strings with background fields are C. G. Callan, D. Friedan, E. J. Martinec and M. J. Perry, Nucl. Phys. B 262 (1985) 593; T. Banks, D. Nemeschansky and A. Sen, Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986) 67

    1998

  28. [36]

    83 (1999) 3370-3373 • e-Print: hep-ph/9905221 [hep-ph]

    A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension , Lisa Randall, Raman Sundrum, Phys.Rev.Lett. 83 (1999) 3370-3373 • e-Print: hep-ph/9905221 [hep-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  29. [38]

    R. P. Feynman, Quantum Electrodynamics p. 68 (W.A. Benjamin, Inc, London 1961)

    1961

  30. [39]

    Schwinger Phys

    J. Schwinger Phys. Rev 82�664 1951

    1951

  31. [40]

    Julian Schwinger, Particles and Sources, Phys.Rev., 152 (1966) 1219-1226

    1966

  32. [41]

    62 (2014) 901-920 e-Print: 1407.0992 [hep-th] DOI: 10.1002/prop.201400059

    Itzhak Bars, Paul Steinhardt, Neil Turok, Dynamical String Tension in String Theory with Spacetime Weyl Invariance Fortsch.Phys. 62 (2014) 901-920 e-Print: 1407.0992 [hep-th] DOI: 10.1002/prop.201400059

    2014 arXiv

  33. [43]

    Strings with a different tension as dark matter

    Guendelman, E.I. Strings with a different tension as dark matter. Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 671 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14408-2

    2025 doi

  34. [44]

    Katty Freese, Martin Wolfgang Winkler, Dark matter and gravitational waves from a dark big bang, Phys.Rev.D 107 (2023) 8, 083522 • e-Print: 2302.11579 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [45]

    Vafa, The String Landscape and the Swampland, Oct., 2005

    C. Vafa, The String Landscape and the Swampland, Oct., 2005. 10.48550/arXiv.hep- th/0509212

    2005 doi

  36. [46]

    Ooguri, E

    H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa, Distance and de Sitter conjectures on the Swampland, Physics Letters B 788 (2019) 180 [1810.05506]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [47]

    E. I. Guendelman, Dynamical string tension theories with target space scale invariance lead- ing to 4D, Eur. Phys. J. C (2025) 85: 615 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14296-6. A shorter version of this paper won the Gravity Research Foundation Essays on Gravitation for 2025

    2025 doi

  38. [48]

    Hopkins, Simulating Atomic Dark Matter in Milky Way Analogues, arXiv:2304.09878 [astro- ph.GA]

    Sandip Roy, Xuejian Shen, Mariangela Lisanti, David Curtin, Norman Murray, Philip F. Hopkins, Simulating Atomic Dark Matter in Milky Way Analogues, arXiv:2304.09878 [astro- ph.GA]

    arXiv

  39. [49]

    Randall, contribution to Black Holes and Cosmology, Reyjavik, https://indico.mpp.mpg.de/event/10969/, based on L

    L. Randall, contribution to Black Holes and Cosmology, Reyjavik, https://indico.mpp.mpg.de/event/10969/, based on L. Randall et. al., to be submitted

  40. [50]

    Stefano Profumo, Dark baryon black holes, Phys.Rev.D 111 (2025) 9, 095010, e-Print: 2502.16439 [hep-ph] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.095010

    2025 arXiv

  41. [51]

    Veneziano A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants 1986 EPL 2 199

    G. Veneziano A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants 1986 EPL 2 199

    1986

  42. [52]

    Guendelman and D

    E. Guendelman and D. Singleton, manuscript in preparation

  43. [53]

    Zeeya Merali, Escaping String Theory Swampland, EurekAlert!, https://www.miragenews.com/escaping-string-theory-swampland-1474428/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.