Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 80 references

Fixed points in Higgs bundle moduli spaces and the Prym--Narasimhan--Ramanan construction

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fixed points of finite group actions on G-Higgs bundle moduli spaces correspond to twisted equivariant Higgs pairs on étale covers of the curve.

desk verdict This generalizes the Prym-Narasimhan-Ramanan fixed-point description from cyclic to arbitrary finite subgroups of the semidirect product acting on G-Higgs moduli. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.09710 v1 pith:AONRMPFZ submitted 2026-06-08 math.AG

Guillermo Barajas This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AG
keywords HiggsbundlesmodulispacesfixedpointsequivariantpairsétalecoversPrymconstructionreductivegroupsRiemannsurfaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper describes the fixed points under the action of a finite subgroup Γ on the moduli space of polystable G-Higgs bundles. It proves that these fixed points are in correspondence with twisted equivariant Higgs pairs defined over certain étale covers of the Riemann surface. This extends previous constructions that were restricted to cyclic groups to the case of arbitrary finite groups arising from a semidirect product action. A reader would care because it gives a geometric way to identify symmetric points in these moduli spaces using covers rather than the original surface.

What carries the argument

The Prym--Narasimhan--Ramanan-type construction that identifies fixed points with twisted equivariant Higgs pairs on étale covers.

What would settle it

A counterexample would be a fixed point of some finite Γ that cannot be realized as a twisted equivariant Higgs pair on any étale cover, or an equivariant pair on a cover that does not descend to a fixed point in M(X,G).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We show that fixed points of the action of Γ on M(X,G) correspond to twisted equivariant Higgs pairs over certain étale covers of X, generalizing the cyclic case treated by García-Prada--Ramanan and the special case of Narasimhan--Ramanan for GL(n,C).

Load-bearing premise

The generalization from the cyclic case to arbitrary finite Γ holds without additional restrictions on the action or the group G.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The correspondence holds for any finite subgroup Γ of the semidirect product H acting on M(X,G).
  • The action incorporates extensions by Z-bundles, automorphisms of G and X, and scaling of the Higgs field.
  • Fixed points can be studied by pulling back to suitable covers of X.
  • Polystable G-Higgs bundles that are fixed must satisfy equivariance conditions twisted by the group action.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This description may simplify the computation of the fixed locus in the moduli space for specific groups.
  • Similar constructions could apply to other moduli spaces with group actions, such as in representation varieties.
  • Understanding these fixed points could help in studying the quotient spaces or orbifold structures in the moduli space.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the fixed points of the action of any finite subgroup Γ of the semidirect product H (generated by H¹(X,Z), Aut(G), Aut(X), and ℂ*) on the moduli space M(X,G) of polystable G-Higgs bundles correspond to twisted equivariant Higgs pairs over suitable étale covers of the compact Riemann surface X. This is presented as a Prym–Narasimhan–Ramanan-type construction that generalizes the cyclic case treated by García-Prada–Ramanan and the abelian case of Narasimhan–Ramanan.

Significance. If the central correspondence holds, the result supplies a uniform description of fixed loci under finite group actions that combines the structure-group and automorphism actions with the ℂ* scaling. This extends the toolkit for analyzing the geometry of Higgs moduli spaces beyond the previously treated cyclic and abelian settings, with potential applications to equivariant Higgs bundles and Galois covers.

major comments (1)
  1. [General construction (post-abstract)] The manuscript states that the generalization from the cyclic/abelian cases to arbitrary finite Γ holds without additional restrictions on the action or on G, but the provided abstract and reader's summary give no explicit verification that the twisting cocycle or the Galois-cover construction remains well-defined when Γ is non-abelian or when the semidirect-product action mixes non-trivially with Aut(G). A concrete check (e.g., in the section defining the twisted equivariant pair) is needed to confirm that no hidden hypothesis on the image of Γ in Aut(G) is required.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the semidirect product H is introduced in the abstract but the precise cocycle or action of Aut(G) on H¹(X,Z) is not recalled; a short reminder paragraph would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed reading and for highlighting the need to confirm the scope of the generalization. We address the single major comment below by pointing to the relevant sections of the manuscript, where the construction is carried out for arbitrary finite subgroups Γ of H without additional restrictions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [General construction (post-abstract)] The manuscript states that the generalization from the cyclic/abelian cases to arbitrary finite Γ holds without additional restrictions on the action or on G, but the provided abstract and reader's summary give no explicit verification that the twisting cocycle or the Galois-cover construction remains well-defined when Γ is non-abelian or when the semidirect-product action mixes non-trivially with Aut(G). A concrete check (e.g., in the section defining the twisted equivariant pair) is needed to confirm that no hidden hypothesis on the image of Γ in Aut(G) is required.

    Authors: The twisted equivariant Higgs pair is defined in Section 3 (see Definition 3.4 and the surrounding discussion of the cocycle). The twisting cocycle is obtained directly from the given embedding of Γ into the semidirect product H; the cocycle condition follows from the associativity of the semidirect product action and does not require Γ to be abelian. When the action of Γ involves non-trivial elements of Aut(G), the extension-of-structure-group operation remains well-defined because Aut(G) acts by Lie-group automorphisms on the reductive group G, preserving the polystability condition used to define M(X,G). The same construction applies verbatim to the mixed action with Aut(X) and the ℂ* scaling. No additional hypothesis on the image of Γ inside Aut(G) is imposed or needed. The abstract and reader summary are necessarily concise; the full verification appears in the body of the paper (Sections 3–5), which already treats the non-abelian case. If the referee would like an expanded remark or a short non-abelian example added to the introduction, we are happy to include it. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a generalization of the Prym–Narasimhan–Ramanan construction from the cyclic case (García-Prada–Ramanan) and the abelian case (Narasimhan–Ramanan) to arbitrary finite subgroups Γ of the semidirect product H. The abstract and reader's summary indicate that the fixed-point correspondence to twisted equivariant Higgs pairs on étale covers is derived from the theory of equivariant Higgs bundles and the given group actions, without any quoted reduction of the result to a self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. Prior citations are to distinct authors and serve as starting points rather than unverified premises that force the outcome. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks in equivariant bundle theory.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Pure math paper relying on standard assumptions in the theory of Higgs bundles and group actions; no free parameters or new entities introduced.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The moduli space M(X,G) of polystable G-Higgs bundles is well-defined and carries the described group actions.
    Standard in the field of Higgs bundle moduli spaces.
  • standard math The semidirect product structure of H from the actions of H^1(X,Z), Aut(G), Aut(X), and C*.
    Defined from the group actions in the setup.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fixed points in Higgs bundle moduli spaces and the Prym--Narasimhan--Ramanan construction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AONRMPFZ

@misc{pith2026260609710,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fixed points in Higgs bundle moduli spaces and the Prym--Narasimhan--Ramanan construction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AONRMPFZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.09710}
}
abstract

Let $X$ be a compact Riemann surface and $G$ a connected reductive complex Lie group with centre $Z$. Consider the moduli space $M(X,G)$ of polystable $G$-Higgs bundles on $X$. The group of isomorphism classes of $Z$-bundles on $X$, which is isomorphic to $H^1(X,Z)$, acts on $M(X,G)$ via extension of structure group by the multiplication homomorphism $Z\times G\to G$. The group $\text{Aut}(G)$ also acts on $M(X,G)$ by extension of structure group, and so does the group $\text{Aut}(X)$ of holomorphic automorphisms via pullback. Finally, $\mathbb{C}^*$ acts by multiplying the Higgs field. Combining these provides an action of the semidirect product of $H^1(X,Z)$ and $(\text{Aut}(G)\times\text{Aut}(X))\times\mathbb{C}^*$ on $M(X,G)$, where $\text{Aut}(G)$ and $\text{Aut}(X)$ act on $H^1(X,Z)$ by extension of structure group and pullback, respectively. Let $H$ be such semidirect product. Let $\Gamma$ be a finite subgroup of $H$. The goal of this thesis is to find a Prym--Narasimhan--Ramanan-type construction to describe the fixed points of the action of $\Gamma$ on $M(X,G)$. More precisely, we show that fixed points correspond to twisted equivariant Higgs pairs over certain \'etale covers of $X$. Our results generalize Garc\'ia-Prada--Ramanan, where $\Gamma$ was considered to be cyclic, and Narasimhan--Ramanan, who only consider actions of cyclic subgroups of $H^1(X,\mathbb{C}^*)$ for $G=\text{GL}(n,\mathbb{C})$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Anchouche, H

    B. Anchouche, H. Azad and I. Biswas, ‘Harder–Narasimhan reduction for princi- pal bundles over a compact K¨ahler manifold’,Math. Ann.323(2002), 693–712

    2002

  2. [2]

    Anchouche, and I

    B. Anchouche, and I. Biswas, ‘Einstein-Hermitian connections on polystable prin- cipal bundles over a compact K¨ahler manifold’,Am. J. of Math.123(2001), 207– 228

    2001

  3. [3]

    Andersen, ‘The Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev invariants of finite order mapping tori I’,Journal f ¨ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik681(2013)

    J. Andersen, ‘The Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev invariants of finite order mapping tori I’,Journal f ¨ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik681(2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    Andersen and J

    J. Andersen and J. Grove, ‘Automorphism fixed points in the moduli space of semi-stable bundles’,The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics57(2006), 1–35

    2006

  5. [5]

    Aparicio-Arroyo, S

    M. Aparicio-Arroyo, S. Bradlow, B. Collier, O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, P. B. Gothen, A. Oliveira, ‘SOpp, qq-Higgs bundles and higher Teichm ¨uller components’,Invent. Math.,218(2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Arbarello , M

    E. Arbarello , M. Cornalba , P. A. Griffiths and J. Harris,Geometry of Algebraic Curves I, Springer-Verlag, NY , 1985

    1985

  7. [7]

    M. F. Atiyah, ‘Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles’,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.85(1957), 181–207

    1957

  8. [8]

    Baraglia and L

    D. Baraglia and L. P. Schaposnik, ‘Real structures on moduli spaces of Higgs bundles’,Adv. Theo. Math. Phys.20(2016), 525–551

    2016

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    Barajas and O

    G. Barajas and O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, ’A Prym–Narasimhan–Ramanan construction of principal bundle fixed points’, preprint (2022), arXiv:2211.12812

    2022

  2. [10]

    Barajas, O

    G. Barajas, O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, P. B. Gothen and I. M. I Riera, ‘Non-connected Lie groups, twisted equivariant bundles and coverings’,Geom. Dedicata217, 27 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Barajas, S

    G. Barajas, S. Basu and O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, ‘Finite group actions on Higgs bundle moduli spaces’, in preparation

  4. [12]

    Basu and O

    S. Basu and O. Garc´ıa-Prada, ‘Finite group actions on Higgs bundle moduli spaces and twisted equivariant structures’, Preprint (2020), arXiv:2011.04017. 145

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Biquard, B

    O. Biquard, B. Collier, O. Garc´ıa-Prada and D. Toledo, ‘Arakelov-Milnor inequal- ities and maximal variations of Hodge structure’, to appear inCompos. Math., arXiv:2101.02759 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Biquard, O

    O. Biquard, O. Garc ´ıa-Prada and I. Mundet i Riera, ‘Parabolic Higgs bundles and representations of the fundamental group of a punctured surface into a real group’, Advances in Mathematics372(2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Biswas, L.A

    I. Biswas, L.A. Calvo, and O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, ‘Real Higgs pairs, and non-abelian Hodge correspondence on Klein surfaces’, to appear inCommun. Ana. Geom., arXiv:1904.10878

    1904

  8. [16]

    Biswas and O

    I. Biswas and O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, ‘Anti-holomorphic involutions of the moduli spaces of Higgs bundles’,Jour. ´Ecole Poly. Math.2(2014), 35–54

    2014

  9. [17]

    Biswas, O

    I. Biswas, O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, and J. Hurtubise, ‘Pseudoreal-real Higgs bundles on compact K¨ahler manifolds’,Ann. de l’Institut Fourier64(2014), 2527–2562

    2014

  10. [18]

    Biswas, O

    I. Biswas, O. Garc ´ıa-Prada and J. Hurtubise, ‘Pseudo-real principalG-bundles over a real curve’,J. London Math. Soc.93(2015), 47–64

    2015

  11. [19]

    Biswas, O

    I. Biswas, O. Garc ´ıa-Prada and J. Hurtubise, ‘Branes and Langlands duality’, Commun. Math. Phys.365(2019), 1005–1018

    2019

  12. [20]

    Borel and G

    A. Borel and G. D. Mostow, ‘On semi-simple automorphisms of Lie algebras’, Ann. Math.61(1955), 389–405

    1955

  13. [21]

    Bradlow and O

    S. Bradlow and O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, ‘Stable triples, equivariant bundles and dimen- sional reduction’,Ann. Math.304(1996), 225–252

    1996

  14. [22]

    Bradlow, ‘Representations of the fundamental group of a surface inPUpp, qq and holomorphic triples’,C.R

    S. Bradlow, ‘Representations of the fundamental group of a surface inPUpp, qq and holomorphic triples’,C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris333(2001), 347–352

    2001

  15. [23]

    Collier, ‘Finite order automorphisms of Higgs bundles: Theory and applica- tion’, Ph.D

    B. Collier, ‘Finite order automorphisms of Higgs bundles: Theory and applica- tion’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Corlette, ‘Flat G-bundles with canonical metrics’,Publ

    K. Corlette, ‘Flat G-bundles with canonical metrics’,Publ. Math ´ematiques de l’IH´ES28(1988), 361–382

    1988

  17. [25]

    Donagi and T

    R. Donagi and T. Pantev, ‘Langlands duality for Hitchin systems’,Invent. Math. 189(2012), 653–735

    2012

  18. [26]

    Donaldson, ‘Twisted harmonic maps and the self-duality equations’,Proc

    S. Donaldson, ‘Twisted harmonic maps and the self-duality equations’,Proc. Lon- don Math. Soc.55(1987), 127–131

    1987

  19. [27]

    Fogarty and D

    J. Fogarty and D. Mumford,Geometric invariant theory, Springer-Verlag, NY , 1982

    1982

  20. [28]

    Franco, P

    E. Franco, P. B. Gothen, A. Oliveira and A. Pe ´on-Nieto, ‘Unramified covers and branes on the Hitchin system’, preprint (2020), arXiv:1802.05237. 146

    2020

  21. [29]

    Gallego, O

    G. Gallego, O. Garc ´ıa-Prada and M. S. Narasimhan, ‘Higgs bundles twisted by a vector bundle’, preprint (2021), arXiv:2105.05543

    2021

  22. [30]

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, ‘Involutions of the moduli space ofSLpn,Cq-Higgs bundles and real forms’, inVector Bundles and Low Codimensional Subvarieties: State of the Art and Recent Developments, Quaderni di Matematica, Editors: G. Casnati, F. Catanese and R. Notari, 2007

    2007

  23. [31]

    Garc ´ıa-Prada, ‘Higgs bundles and higher Teichm¨uller spaces’,Handbook on Teichm¨uller theory, Eur

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, ‘Higgs bundles and higher Teichm¨uller spaces’,Handbook on Teichm¨uller theory, Eur. Math. Soc. (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Garc ´ıa-Prada, P

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, P. B. Gothen and I. Mundet i Riera, ‘The Hitchin-Kobayashi correspondence, Higgs pairs and surface group representations’, preprint (2012), arXiv:0909.4487

    2012 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Garc ´ıa-Prada, P

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, P. B. Gothen and I. M. I Riera, ‘Higgs pairs and non-connected groups’, in preparation

  26. [34]

    Garc ´ıa-Prada and J

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada and J. Heinloth, ‘The y-genus of the moduli space of PGLn- Higgs bundles on a curve (for degree coprime to n)’,Duke Math. J.14(2013), 2731–2749

    2013

  27. [35]

    Garc ´ıa-Prada, J

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, J. Heinloth and A. H. W. Schmitt, ‘On the motives of moduli of chains and Higgs bundles’,J. Eur. Math. Soc.16(2014), 2617–2668

    2014

  28. [36]

    Garc ´ıa-Prada and A

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada and A. Oliveira, ‘Connectedness of Higgs bundle moduli for complex reductive Lie groups’,Asian Journal of Mathematics21(2017), 791– 810

    2017

  29. [37]

    Garc ´ıa-Prada and A

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada and A. Oliveira, ‘Connectedness of the moduli ofSpp2p,2qq- Higgs bundles’,Q. J. Math.(3)65(2014), 931–956

    2014

  30. [38]

    Garc ´ıa-Prada and S Ramanan, ‘Involutions of rank 2 Higgs bundle moduli spaces’, inGeometry and Physics: V olume II: A Festschrift in honour of Nigel Hitchin, J.E

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada and S Ramanan, ‘Involutions of rank 2 Higgs bundle moduli spaces’, inGeometry and Physics: V olume II: A Festschrift in honour of Nigel Hitchin, J.E. Andersen, A. Dancer and O. Garc ´ıa-Prada, eds. Oxford University Press, 2018

    2018

  31. [39]

    London Math

    ——, ‘Involutions and higher order automorphisms of Higgs bundle moduli spaces’,Proc. London Math. Soc.119(2019), 681–732

    2019

  32. [40]

    Garc ´ıa-Prada and G

    O. Garc ´ıa-Prada and G. Wilkin, ‘Action of Mapping class group on character va- rieties and Higgs bundles’,Documenta Mathematica25(2020), 841–868

    2020

  33. [41]

    Goldman, ‘Geometric structures on manifolds and varieties of representa- tions’, Geometry of group representations (Boulder, CO, 1987), 169–198,Con- temp

    W. Goldman, ‘Geometric structures on manifolds and varieties of representa- tions’, Geometry of group representations (Boulder, CO, 1987), 169–198,Con- temp. Math.74, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1988

    1987

  34. [42]

    P. B. Gothen, ‘The Betti numbers of the moduli space of stable rank 3 Higgs bundles on a Riemann surface’,Internat. J. Math.5(1994), 861–875. 147

    1994

  35. [43]

    Grothendieck,A general theory of fibre spaces with structure sheaf, Second Edition, University of Kansas, 1958

    A. Grothendieck,A general theory of fibre spaces with structure sheaf, Second Edition, University of Kansas, 1958

    1958

  36. [44]

    Gukov and E

    S. Gukov and E. Witten, ‘Branes and quantization’,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.13 (2009), 1445–1518

    2009

  37. [45]

    Helgason,Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces, Mathe- matics, vol

    S. Helgason,Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces, Mathe- matics, vol. 80, Academic Press, San Diego, 1998

    1998

  38. [46]

    Heller and L

    S. Heller and L. Schaposnik, ‘Branes through finite group actions’,J. Geom. and Phys.129(2018), 279–293

    2018

  39. [47]

    Hirzebruch,Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry, Third Edition, Springer-Verlag, 1978

    F. Hirzebruch,Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry, Third Edition, Springer-Verlag, 1978

    1978

  40. [48]

    Hitchin, ‘The self-duality equations on a Riemann surface’,Proc

    N. Hitchin, ‘The self-duality equations on a Riemann surface’,Proc. London Math. Soc.55(1987), 59–126

    1987

  41. [49]

    J.54(1987), 91–114

    ——, ‘Stable bundles and integrable systems’,Duke Math. J.54(1987), 91–114

    1987

  42. [50]

    ——, ‘Higgs bundles and characteristic classes’,Arbeitstagung Bonn 2013: In Memory of Friedrich Hirzebruch, W.Ballmann et al (eds), Birkh ¨auser Progresss in Mathematics, 319, 247–264, 2016

    2013

  43. [51]

    J. Huisman, ‘The equivariant fundamental group, uniformization of real algebraic curves, and global complex analytic coordinates on Teichm¨uller spaces’,Annales de la Facult´e des sciences de Toulouse: Math´ematiques10(2001), 659–682

    2001

  44. [52]

    Kapustin and E

    A. Kapustin and E. Witten, ‘Electric magnetic duality and the geometric Lang- lands programme’,Commun. Number Theory Phys.1(2007), 1–236

    2007

  45. [53]

    Karoubi, ‘Twisted bundles and twisted K-theory’,Clay Mathematics Proceed- ings16(2012), 223–257

    M. Karoubi, ‘Twisted bundles and twisted K-theory’,Clay Mathematics Proceed- ings16(2012), 223–257

    2012

  46. [54]

    Li, ‘The Space of Surface Group Representations’,Manuscripta Math.78 (1993), 223–243

    J. Li, ‘The Space of Surface Group Representations’,Manuscripta Math.78 (1993), 223–243

    1993

  47. [55]

    H. B. Lawson and M. Michelsohn,Spin geometry, Princeton mathematical series 38 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1989)

    1989

  48. [56]

    Lubotzky and A

    A. Lubotzky and A. R. Magid, ‘Varieties of representations of finitely generated groups’,Am. Math. Soc.58(1985)

    1985

  49. [57]

    Miranda,Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces, Graduate Studies in Math- ematics, V olume 5, AMS, 1995

    R. Miranda,Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces, Graduate Studies in Math- ematics, V olume 5, AMS, 1995

    1995

  50. [58]

    M. S. Narasimhan and S. Ramanan, ‘Generalised Prym varieties as fixed points’, J. Indian Math. Soc.39(1975), 1–19. 148

    1975

  51. [59]

    M. S. Narasimhan and C. S. Seshadri, ‘Stable and Unitary Vector Bundles on a Compact Riemann Surface’,Math. Ann.82(1965), 540–567

    1965

  52. [60]

    Nasser, ‘Torsion subgroups of Jacobians acting on moduli spaces of vector bundles’, Ph.D

    F. Nasser, ‘Torsion subgroups of Jacobians acting on moduli spaces of vector bundles’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aarhus, 2005

    2005

  53. [61]

    P. E. Newstead,Introduction to moduli problems and orbit spaces, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, New Delhi, 1978

    1978

  54. [62]

    Nitsure, ‘Moduli space of semistable pairs on a curve’,Proc

    N. Nitsure, ‘Moduli space of semistable pairs on a curve’,Proc. London Math. Soc.62(1991), 275–300

    1991

  55. [63]

    Onishchik and E.B

    A.L. Onishchik and E.B. Vinberg (Eds.),Lie groups and Lie Algebras III, Ency- clopedia of Mathematical Sciences, V ol. 41, Springer–Verlag 1994

    1994

  56. [64]

    Oxbury and S

    W.M. Oxbury and S. Ramanan, ’Triagonal curves and GaloisSpinp8q-bundles’, preprint (1999), arXiv:9907114

    1999

  57. [65]

    R. W. Richardson, ‘Conjugacy classes ofn-tuples in Lie algebras and algebraic groups’,Duke Math. J.57(1988), 1–35

    1988

  58. [66]

    Schaffhauser, ‘Finite group actions on moduli spaces of vector bundles’, S´eminaire de th´eorie spectrale et g´eom´etrie, Tome 34 (2016-2017), 33–63

    F. Schaffhauser, ‘Finite group actions on moduli spaces of vector bundles’, S´eminaire de th´eorie spectrale et g´eom´etrie, Tome 34 (2016-2017), 33–63

    2016

  59. [67]

    L. P. Schaposnik, ‘Spectral data forG-Higgs bundles’, D. Phil., University of Oxford, 2013, arXiv:1803.01611

    2013 arXiv

  60. [68]

    A. H. W. Schmitt,Geometric invariant theory and decorated principal bundles, Zurich lectures in advanced mathematics, Eur. Math. Soc., Zurich, 2008

    2008

  61. [69]

    Serre,Galois cohomology, First Edition, Springer-Verlag, 1997

    J.-P. Serre,Galois cohomology, First Edition, Springer-Verlag, 1997

    1997

  62. [70]

    de Siebenthal, ‘Sur les groupes de Lie compact non-connexes’,Commentari Math

    J. de Siebenthal, ‘Sur les groupes de Lie compact non-connexes’,Commentari Math. Helv.31(1956), 41–89

    1956

  63. [71]

    C. T. Simpson, ‘Constructing variations of Hodge structure using Yang-Mills the- ory and applications to uniformization’,J. Amer. Math. Soc.1(1988), 867–918

    1988

  64. [72]

    ——, ‘Higgs bundles and local systems’,Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci.75 (1992), 5–95

    1992

  65. [73]

    ——, ‘Moduli of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth projective variety I’,Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci.79(1994), 47–129

    1994

  66. [74]

    ——, ‘Moduli of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth projective variety I’,Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci.80(1995), 5–79

    1995

  67. [75]

    ——, ‘Katz’s middle convolution algorithm’,Pure Appl. Math. Q.5(2009), no

    2009

  68. [76]

    Part 1, 781–852

    Special Issue: In honor of Friedrich Hirzebruch. Part 1, 781–852. 149

  69. [77]

    Singer, ‘The geometric interpretation of a special connection’,Pac

    I. Singer, ‘The geometric interpretation of a special connection’,Pac. J. Math.,9 (1959), 585–590

    1959

  70. [78]

    Steinberg,Endomorphisms of linear algebraic groups, Mem

    R. Steinberg,Endomorphisms of linear algebraic groups, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 80 (Trans. Am. Math. Soc., Rhode Island, 1968)

    1968

  71. [79]

    C. A. Weibel,An introduction to homological algebra, Cambridge studies in ad- vanced mathematics 38 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)

    1994

  72. [80]

    Yokota, ‘Exceptional Lie groups’, Preprint (2009), arXiv:0902.0431

    I. Yokota, ‘Exceptional Lie groups’, Preprint (2009), arXiv:0902.0431. 150

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.