REVIEW 1 cited by
Wave propagation in a weak gravitational field and the validity of the thin lens approximation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Wave effects can be important for the gravitational lensing of gravitational waves. In such a case, wave optics must be used in stead of geometric optics. We consider a plane wave entering a lens object and solve numerically the wave equation for three lens models: the uniform density sphere, the singular isothermal sphere, and the Hernquist model. By comparing our numerical solutions with the analytical solutions under the thin lens approximation, we evaluate the error of this approximation. The results show that the relative error of the thin lens approximation is small if the geometrical thickness of the lens is much smaller than the distance between the lens and the observer.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Born approximation in wave optics gravitational lensing revisited
For a point-mass lens, the n-th Born term scales as y^{-2} w^{n-1}, so the Born approximation is accurate at low normalized frequency w and large impact parameter.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.