Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 94 references

A simple acylindrical recipe for non-split characteristic $2$ sharply $k$-transitive actions and their generalizations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a group carrying a hyperbolic $\Theta$-seed admits a sharply $\Theta$-transitive action on an infinite set, non-split for $\Theta=S_2$ and $\Theta=S_3$.

desk verdict Promising seed construction, but Theorem A overreaches: the induction needs a finite-coset/properness condition that acylindricity alone does not supply. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10114 v1 pith:ARMUJOST submitted 2026-08-10 math.GR

J de la Nuez Gonzalez This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.GR MSC 20B2220F6520F67
keywords sharplyk-transitiveactionsnon-split2-transitivegroupsacylindricallyhyperbolicsmallcancellationpermutationrobustsubgroupsgeneralizedcharacteristic2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's claim is that a short list of geometric conditions on a group $G$ acting acylindrically (elements that move two far-apart points by a bounded amount are uniformly few) on a $\delta$-hyperbolic space forces $G$ to act on an infinite set in a sharply $\Theta$-transitive way: the action is $k$-sharp, transitive on $k$-sets, and the setwise stabilizer of every $k$-set acts on it as a prescribed transitive 'robust' subgroup $\Theta\leq S_k$. For $\Theta=S_2$ and $\Theta=S_3$ the resulting sharply 2- and 3-transitive actions are non-split, meaning the relevant point stabilizers contain no nontrivial proper abelian normal subgroup that would make the action a semidirect product. This matters because non-split sharply 2-transitive groups were only recently known to exist, and the recipe turns their construction into a consequence of acylindrical hyperbolicity. The practical payoff is concrete: every acylindrically hyperbolic group admits an action that is $k$-sharp and transitive on $k$-sets, and hyperbolic groups with one involution class (or a suitable $S_3$ subgroup) and the right normalizer data become sharply 2- or 3-transitive.

What carries the argument

The engine is the small-cancellation extension step. Given a promising subgroup $H$, one selects a loxodromic element $\alpha$ that is $(p,\nu)$-small-cancellation over a finite set, commutes with a prescribed finite subgroup $\Omega$, satisfies $K(\alpha)=\Omega$, and is neatly transverse to $H$; conjugates $\alpha_i=g_{i,-1}\alpha g_{i,1}^{-1}$ are then added so that $H'=\langle H,\alpha_i\rangle$ is the free product $H*F(\alpha_i)$. Extension arcs built from geodesics $[p,\alpha p]$ and their translates are quasigeodesic, and the fellow-traveling analysis of Lemma 4.9 shows that if translates of extension arcs run parallel for a long stretch, the sequence of exponents of the $\alpha_i$ must alternate and have length at most two. That rigidity is what preserves $k$-malnormality, giving sharpness; the same geometric separation bounds keep the setwise stabilizer of each $k$-set exactly conjugate to the prescribed $\Theta$.

What would settle it

The direct place to test the claim is the inductive step Lemma 5.4: take a concrete hyperbolic group satisfying the hypotheses of Corollary C, choose a strict $\Omega$-set $A$ and another $\Omega$-set $A'$ in a different $G$-orbit, and try to build the extension $H<H_1$ that is injective on a large ball and merges $A$ and $A'$ in $H_1\setminus G$. If no such extension exists, or if in the resulting limit action some nonidentity element fixes a $k$-tuple of distinct points for the relevant $k$, then $k$-sharpness fails and the theorem would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, Theorem A, is that a 'hyperbolic $\Theta$-seed' is enough. Fix $k>1$ and a transitive robust subgroup $\Theta$ of $S_k$; a seed is a countable group $G$ with a non-elementary acylindrical action on a $\delta$-hyperbolic space, a subgroup $H_0$ whose cosets realize the permutation action of $\Theta$ on $k$ except for one prescribed free part, loxodromic elements $h_\Omega$ for each representative $\Omega$ of the docile subgroups of $\Theta$, and the normalizer condition $K(N_G(\Omega))=\Omega$. From any such seed the paper builds, by induction over a chain of free-product extensions, a limit action $H_\infty\curvearrowright H_\infty\setminus G$ that is sharply $\Theta$-transitive. In the cases $\Theta=S_2$ and $\Theta=S_3$, the absence of nontrivial proper normal abelian subgroups in $G$ (or in a point stabilizer) makes the actions non-split. The paper also extracts Corollaries B and C, which turn the seed conditions into checkable hypotheses on acylindrically hyperbolic and hyperbolic groups.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that for each representative $\Omega$ in the chosen list, the largest finite normal subgroup of the normalizer $N_G(\Omega)$ is exactly $\Omega$; if the normalizer contains any additional finite normal subgroup, the small-cancellation element cannot be made to centralize exactly $\Omega$, and the inductive extension cannot start.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every acylindrically hyperbolic group admits an action that is $k$-sharp and transitive on $k$-sets for every $k>1$ (Corollary B(I)).
  • A hyperbolic group with a unique infinite conjugacy class of involutions $\sigma$, a non-elementary centralizer $C_G(\sigma)$, and $K(C_G(\sigma))=\langle\sigma\rangle$ is sharply 2-transitive (Corollary C(A)).
  • A hyperbolic group containing a copy of $S_3$ with the normalizer, quasiconvexity, and malnormality conditions of Corollary C(B) is sharply 3-transitive.
  • When $\Theta=S_2$ or $\Theta=S_3$, the constructed actions have generalized characteristic 2 and are non-split; because the ambient groups in Corollary C are hyperbolic, these give finitely presented examples.
  • The seed construction applies to any transitive robust $\Theta$, so the same geometric recipe covers sharply $\Theta$-transitive actions with local permutation groups other than symmetric groups, subject to satisfying the seed hypotheses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the robustness list (cyclic $C_k$, dihedral $D_m$ for odd $m$, $A_4$, $A_5$) suggests the seed method should also yield sharply $\Theta$-transitive actions for these local groups once the normalizer condition $K(N_G(\Omega))=\Omega$ is realized; the paper does not spell these examples out.
  • Editorial extension: since the construction is an increasing union of free products with small-cancellation relations, the point-stabilizer structure of the final action is likely tame enough to analyze model-theoretically, matching the author's announced plan to study the positive theory of these actions.
  • Editorial extension: the recipe converts the existence problem for non-split sharply 2-transitive groups into a search for hyperbolic groups with prescribed centralizers of involutions; thus any concrete hyperbolic group with the Corollary C(A) profile is a potential new example, and failure of sharpness would pinpoint exactly where the normalizer hypotheses are insufficient.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper defines a 'hyperbolic Θ-seed' for a transitive robust subgroup Θ ≤ S_k: a countable group G with a non-elementary acylindrical action on a δ-hyperbolic space, together with a subgroup H_0 whose coset action is controlled and with transverse loxodromic elements h_Ω. Theorem A asserts that any group admitting such a seed has a sharply Θ-transitive action on an infinite set, and that for Θ = S_2, S_3 these actions are non-split. Corollary B specializes to acylindrically hyperbolic groups, and Corollary C gives concrete hypotheses on hyperbolic groups implying sharp 2- and 3-transitivity. The proof proceeds by iteratively adjoining small-cancellation elements α_i = g_{i,-1} α g_{i,1}^{-1} to H_0, using geometric fellow-traveling lemmas to preserve k-malnormality and transversality, and finally taking the union H_∞.

Significance. If the proof were complete, the result would be valuable: it gives a uniform geometric mechanism producing non-split sharply 2- and 3-transitive actions from acylindrical actions, and it places the earlier algebraic constructions of [dlNGS25] in a geometric setting. The paper is ambitious and contains a substantial amount of original small-cancellation technology (Lemmas 2.12, 3.8, and 4.1), and the hyperbolic-group corollaries are concrete and checkable. However, the main theorem's proof currently has a serious gap concerning finiteness of the sets N_H(R), and one key computation is deferred, so the paper cannot be accepted in its present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, proof of Theorem A, inequality (20)] The strict inequality |H_n\N(R_{n+1})| > |N_{H_n}(R_n)| is used to guarantee condition (iii) of the iterative construction, but the proof never establishes that the sets N_H(R) are finite. Under Definition 0.11 the action is only assumed acylindrical and non-elementary on a δ-hyperbolic metric space; no properness or finiteness of bounded sets is assumed. Acylindricity does not imply finite point stabilizers: for example, an acylindrical action on a tree arising from A *_C B with C finite and A infinite has an infinite vertex stabilizer. With H_0 = {1}, the set N_{H_0}(R) then contains this infinite stabilizer for every R, so |H_0\N(R)| is infinite and cannot be made strictly larger than a previous infinite cardinal; inequality (20) is unsatisfiable. Since condition (iii) is used to ensure that H_∞ has infinite index, the iterative construction in Theorem A is not justified for non-proper actions. The theorem as stated is therefore not proven as written; the author should either add a properness or finite-bounded-coset assumption to Definition 0.11 or replace the cardinal argument with a different mechanism.
  2. [Section 0.3, Corollary B(I)] Corollary B(I) states that any acylindrically hyperbolic group admits an action on a set that is k-sharp and transitive on k-sets, and the preceding sentence indicates this is meant to follow from Theorem A with Θ = {1} ≤ S_k. However, Theorem A explicitly requires Θ to be transitive on k, and the trivial group {1} is not transitive on k for k > 1. The proof of Corollary B only checks that H_0 = {1} satisfies the seed conditions and does not address this mismatch. If Corollary B(I) is intended for Θ = S_k instead, then robustness of S_k only holds for k ≤ 3 by Lemma 0.6, so the general statement still does not follow. The corollary needs either a separate proof or a corrected hypothesis.
  3. [Section 4, Lemma 4.1(vi)-(vii)] The proof of Lemma 4.1 concludes with the statement that the desired lower bounds on the H-subarcs follow by 'an easy but tedious calculation which is left to the reader.' These bounds are not optional: they feed directly into Lemma 4.9's diameter estimate, which is in turn used in Lemma 5.4 to prove that H_1 is k-malnormal and geometrically k-separated. The referee cannot verify the malnormality step without this calculation. The author should supply the full computation or provide a precise reference that contains it.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract says this yields 'split sharply 2 and 3-transitive actions', but the title and the note after Theorem A state that the resulting actions are non-split; the abstract should be corrected to 'non-split'.
  2. [Title] The title contains a typesetting artifact, '2SHARPL Yk-TRANSITIVE', which should be corrected in the final version.
  3. [Observation 0.12] The notation 'tH h^m_{t1u}_{m∈Z}' is garbled; it should presumably read '{H h^m : m ∈ Z}'.
  4. [Lemma 2.12] The symbol m is used both for the integer appearing in the word defining α and for the number of blocks in the product; this creates avoidable confusion and the two roles should be denoted differently.
  5. [Corollary C(B)(i)] The phrase 'if Ω ≤ S ≤ G' is unclear; it should presumably read 'if Ω ≤ S_3 ≤ G' or similar, since S is not introduced as a subgroup of G.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; Theorem A is a conditional geometric construction rather than a repackaged input.

full rationale

The paper's main result is conditional on the existence of a hyperbolic Θ-seed, which is an input assumption and not derived from the conclusion. The proof of Theorem A builds H_{n+1} from H_n by genuinely new small-cancellation and fellow-traveling arguments (Lemma 2.12, Lemma 3.8, Lemma 4.9, Lemma 5.4); the sharp Θ-transitive action on H_∞\G is constructed, not assumed. The self-citations to [dlNGS25] supply auxiliary combinatorial facts about robust permutation groups (Lemma 5.2 and the argument quoted in Lemma 5.7), and these facts are independent of the acylindrical-to-transitivity implication being proved; they do not smuggle in the target action. The non-split assertion follows from standard acylindrical group theory [Osi16], not from a self-referential uniqueness theorem. No equation or definition in the paper reduces the conclusion to an input by construction. The potential issue raised by the skeptic, namely that |H\N(R)| may be infinite for non-proper acylindrical actions, is a correctness or hypothesis gap, not a circularity, so it is not scored here.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No empirical parameters are fitted; this is a pure existence theorem. The central claim rests on the strong seed hypothesis and on imported lemmas from the author's own preprint [dlNGS25], which is the main source of epistemic dependence.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard results on acylindrically hyperbolic groups, including Osin's trichotomy (Theorem 0.8) and existence of maximal finite normal subgroup K(G) (Theorem 0.9 and [DGO17, Thm 6.14]).
    Invoked throughout the proof; these are accepted results from the literature.
  • standard math Morse lemma, quasigeodesic fellow-traveling, and hyperbolic geometry facts (Lemmas 1.7 to 1.12).
    Used in nearly every geometric lemma; standard in geometric group theory.
  • domain assumption Key algebraic lemmas from [dlNGS25, Lem. 2.9, 2.10, 3.27], including the classification of stabilizers and the structure of Theta-invariant k-sets.
    The paper imports these load-bearing results from the author's own prior preprint, which is not independently verified here.
  • domain assumption Existence of a hyperbolic Theta-seed for the particular group G (Definition 0.11).
    The main theorem is conditional on this strong input; the corollaries verify it in special cases.
  • ad hoc to paper The convention that geodesic projections and distance-minimizing points exist (Section 0.3 and Section 1.1).
    Used to define projection language and simplify calculations; harmless in geodesic spaces but an added convention.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A simple acylindrical recipe for non-split characteristic $2$ sharply $k$-transitive actions and their generalizations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ARMUJOST

@misc{pith2026260810114,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A simple acylindrical recipe for non-split characteristic $2$ sharply $k$-transitive actions and their generalizations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ARMUJOST}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10114}
}
abstract

We provide a fairly simple list of conditions on a group $G$ acting acylindrically on a $\delta$-hyperbolic metric space implying that the group admits an action on a set that is $k$-sharp, transitive on $k$-sets and has the property that for any $k$-set $A$ the setwise stabilizer of $A$ acts on $A$ as prescribed by some fixed subgroup $\Theta\leq\sym_{k}$. In particular, this yields many easy examples of finitely generated and even presented split sharply $2$ and $3$-transitive actions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11958 , year=

    Non-split sharply 2-transitive groups of bounded exponent , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11958 , year=

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Non-split sharply 2- and 3-transitive groups in

    Amelio, Marco and Andr. Non-split sharply 2- and 3-transitive groups in. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , note=

  3. [3]

    International Mathematics Research Notices , volume=

    Non-split sharply 2-transitive groups of odd positive characteristic , author=. International Mathematics Research Notices , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  4. [4]

    European Journal of Combinatorics , pages=

    Ramsey expansions of metrically homogeneous graphs , author=. European Journal of Combinatorics , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  5. [5]

    Sharply 2-transitive groups of finite

    Altinel, Tuna and Berkman, Ayse and Wagner, Frank Olaf , journal=. Sharply 2-transitive groups of finite

  6. [6]

    Compositio Mathematica , volume=

    Finitely generated simple sharply 2-transitive groups , author=. Compositio Mathematica , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  7. [7]

    Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    Simple sharply 2-transitive groups , author=. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

  8. [8]

    Assous, Roland , journal=. Encha. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    The Journal of Symbolic Logic , volume=

    Free amalgamation and automorphism groups , author=. The Journal of Symbolic Logic , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  2. [10]

    Journal of Differential Geometry , volume=

    A combination theorem for negatively curved groups , author=. Journal of Differential Geometry , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  3. [11]

    , author=

    A locally finite dense group acting on the random graph. , author=. Forum Mathematicum , volume=

  4. [12]

    Groups of finite Morley rank , author=

  5. [13]

    , author=

    Ramsey classes: examples and constructions. , author=. Surveys in Combinatorics , volume=

  6. [14]

    2008 , publisher=

    Introduction to group theory , author=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  7. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.27890 , year=

    Determining the normal subgroups of the automorphism groups of ultrahomogeneous structures via stabilisers , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.27890 , year=

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    European Journal of Combinatorics , volume=

    Graphs which contain all small graphs , author=. European Journal of Combinatorics , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

    1981

  9. [17]

    Journal of Algebra , volume=

    Simplicity of the automorphism groups of order and tournament expansions of homogeneous structures , author=. Journal of Algebra , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  10. [18]

    Mathematische Zeitschrift , volume=

    Transitivity of permutation groups on unordered sets , author=. Mathematische Zeitschrift , volume=. 1976 , publisher=

    1976

  11. [19]

    Cameron, Peter J. , year=. Oligomorphic Permutation Groups , publisher=

  12. [20]

    1999 , publisher=

    Permutation groups , author=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  13. [21]

    , journal=

    Cameron, Peter J. , journal=. Homogeneous. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  14. [22]

    , TITLE =

    Cherlin, Gregory L. , TITLE =. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1998 , NUMBER =

    1998

  15. [23]

    2015 , publisher=

    Cherlin, Gregory , journal=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  16. [24]

    Introduction to

    Chiswell, Ian , year=. Introduction to

  17. [25]

    Dihedral groups

    Conrad, Keith , year =. Dihedral groups

  18. [26]

    The Journal of Symbolic Logic , volume=

    An axiomatic approach to free amalgamation , author=. The Journal of Symbolic Logic , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  19. [27]

    Mock hyperbolic reflection spaces and

    Clausen, Tim and Tent, Katrin , journal=. Mock hyperbolic reflection spaces and. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  20. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05187 , year=

    On the geometry of sharply 2-transitive groups , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05187 , year=

    2002 arXiv

  21. [29]

    1996 , publisher=

    Permutation groups , author=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  22. [30]

    Advances in Mathematics , volume=

    Dense locally finite subgroups of automorphism groups of ultraextensive spaces , author=. Advances in Mathematics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  23. [31]

    Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics , volume=

    Homogeneous actions on the random graph , author=. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics , volume=

  24. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02477 , year=

    Homogeneous actions on Urysohn spaces , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02477 , year=

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Sur l'extension aux relations de quelques propri\'

    Fra\". Sur l'extension aux relations de quelques propri\'. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (3) , FJOURNAL =. 1954 , PAGES =

    1954

  26. [34]

    Frobenius , year=

    G. Frobenius , year=. S. B. Akad. Berlin , pages=

  27. [35]

    International Mathematics Research Notices , volume=

    Sharply 2-transitive linear groups , author=. International Mathematics Research Notices , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  28. [36]

    Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    Non-split linear sharply 2-transitive groups , author=. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

  29. [37]

    Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    A note on groups generated by involutions and sharply 2-transitive groups , author=. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

  30. [38]

    Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , volume=

    A constructive solution to a tournament problem , author=. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , volume=. 1971 , publisher=

    1971

  31. [39]

    On a theorem of

    Hall Jr., Marshall , journal=. On a theorem of

  32. [40]

    Algebraic topology , author =

  33. [41]

    Pacific J

    A family of countable homogeneous graphs , author=. Pacific J. Math , volume=. 1971 , publisher=

    1971

  34. [42]

    1993 , PAGES =

    Hodges, Wilfrid , TITLE =. 1993 , PAGES =

    1993

  35. [43]

    Infinite-dimensional

    Ibarluc. Infinite-dimensional. Inventiones mathematicae , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  36. [44]

    The random tournament as a

    Jaligot, Eric and Khelif, Anatole , journal=. The random tournament as a. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  37. [45]

    Journal de Math

    Recherches sur les substitutions , author=. Journal de Math

  38. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.06137 , year=

    Universal-homogeneous structures are generic , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.06137 , year=

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    1995 , publisher=

    Classical descriptive set theory , author=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  40. [48]

    Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    Automorphism groups of finite topological rank , author=. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

  41. [49]

    Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , volume=

    Finite and infinite cyclic extensions of free groups , author=. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , volume=. 1973 , publisher=

    1973

  42. [50]

    Hamburger mathematische Einzelschriften – Heft 6 , publisher=

    On infinite sharply multiply transitive groups , author=. Hamburger mathematische Einzelschriften – Heft 6 , publisher=

  43. [51]

    Group-extensive embeddings into

    Kwiatkowska, Aleksandra and Sullivan, Rob and Winkel, Jeroen , journal=. Group-extensive embeddings into. 2026 , note=

    2026

  44. [52]

    Lachlan, A. H. , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1984 , NUMBER =

    1984

  45. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.08540 , year=

    Automorphism groups of homogeneous structures with stationary weak independence relations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.08540 , year=

    1911 arXiv

  46. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.02475 , year=

    Automorphism groups of linearly ordered homogeneous structures , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.02475 , year=

    2009 arXiv

  47. [55]

    2021 , school =

    Li, Yibei , title =. 2021 , school =

    2021

  48. [56]

    1979 , publisher=

    Combinatorial group theory , author=. 1979 , publisher=

    1979

  49. [57]

    1996 , journal=

    Sharply multiply homogeneous permutation groups, and rational scale types , author=. 1996 , journal=

    1996

  50. [58]

    Discrete mathematics , volume=

    A survey of homogeneous structures , author=. Discrete mathematics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  51. [59]

    Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    Sharply 2-transitive groups with point stabilizer of exponent 3 or 6 , author=. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

  52. [60]

    2026 , publisher =

    Some aspects of topological dynamics of Polish groups (with an introduction to descriptive set theory) , author =. 2026 , publisher =

    2026

  53. [61]

    2025 , publisher=

    Elements of algebraic topology , author=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  54. [62]

    Journal of Algebra , volume=

    Simplicity of some automorphism groups , author=. Journal of Algebra , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  55. [63]

    Journal of the London Mathematical Society , volume=

    On the commutativity of addition , author=. Journal of the London Mathematical Society , volume=. 1940 , publisher=

    1940

  56. [64]

    1968 , publisher =

    Permutation groups , author=. 1968 , publisher =

    1968

  57. [65]

    A sharply 2-transitive group without a non-trivial abelian normal subgroup , author=. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , volume=

  58. [66]

    Journal f

    Sharply 2-transitive groups of characteristic 0 , author=. Journal f. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  59. [67]

    2002 , publisher=

    Trees , author=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  60. [68]

    Annals of Mathematics , volume=

    On torsion-free groups with infinitely many ends , author=. Annals of Mathematics , volume=. 1968 , publisher=

    1968

  61. [69]

    Forum Mathematicum , volume=

    Sharply n -transitive groups in o-minimal structures , author=. Forum Mathematicum , volume=

  62. [70]

    Advances in Mathematics , volume=

    Sharply 3-transitive groups , author=. Advances in Mathematics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  63. [71]

    Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung , volume=

    Infinite sharply multiply transitive groups , author=. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  64. [72]

    Groupes triplement transitifs et generalisations , author=. Alg. 1949 , organization=

    1949

  65. [73]

    Tits, Jacques , publisher=. G\'

  66. [74]

    Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici , volume=

    Sur les groupes doublement transitifs continus , author=. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici , volume=. 1952 , publisher=

    1952

  67. [75]

    Sur les groupes doublement transitifs continus: correction et compl

    Tits, Jacques , journal=. Sur les groupes doublement transitifs continus: correction et compl

  68. [76]

    Turkish Journal of Mathematics , volume=

    Splitting of sharply 2-transitive groups of characteristic 3 , author=. Turkish Journal of Mathematics , volume=

  69. [77]

    On the isometry group of the

    Tent, Katrin and Ziegler, Martin , journal=. On the isometry group of the. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  70. [78]

    Advances in Geometry , volume=

    Sharply 2-transitive groups , author=. Advances in Geometry , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  71. [79]

    Lokal endliche, scharf zweifach transitive

    von W. Lokal endliche, scharf zweifach transitive. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universit. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  72. [80]

    Journal of the London Mathematical Society , volume=

    On infinite four-transitive permutation groups , author=. Journal of the London Mathematical Society , volume=. 1979 , publisher=

    1979

  73. [81]

    Kennzeichnung endlicher linearer

    Zassenhaus, Hans , booktitle=. Kennzeichnung endlicher linearer. 1935 , organization=

    1935

  74. [82]

    1935 , organization=

    Zassenhaus, Hans , booktitle=. 1935 , organization=

    1935

  75. [83]

    2017 , publisher=

    Hyperbolically embedded subgroups and rotating families in groups acting on hyperbolic spaces , author=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  76. [84]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.6933 , year=

    Small cancellation theory and Burnside problem , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.6933 , year=

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Geometry & Topology , volume=

    Bounded cohomology of subgroups of mapping class groups , author=. Geometry & Topology , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  78. [86]

    Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    Acylindrically hyperbolic groups , author=. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

  79. [87]

    Group theory from a geometrical viewpoint , pages=

    Notes on word hyperbolic groups , author=. Group theory from a geometrical viewpoint , pages=

  80. [88]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11166 , year=

    Two generalisations of sharp k-transitivity , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11166 , year=

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    2013 , publisher=

    Metric spaces of non-positive curvature , author=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  82. [90]

    Journal of Functional Analysis , volume=

    A corrected quantitative version of the Morse lemma , author=. Journal of Functional Analysis , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  83. [91]

    Journal of Functional Analysis , volume=

    A quantitative version of the Morse lemma and quasi-isometries fixing the ideal boundary , author=. Journal of Functional Analysis , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  84. [92]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21203 , year=

    Classifying group actions on hyperbolic spaces , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21203 , year=

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    Inventiones mathematicae , volume=

    Acylindrical accessibility for groups , author=. Inventiones mathematicae , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  86. [94]

    Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics , volume=

    Small cancellation in acylindrically hyperbolic groups , author=. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics , volume=

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.