Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Wavelet based solutions to the Poisson and the Helmholtz equations on the $n$-dimensional unit sphere

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Wavelet inversion gives explicit Green functions for Poisson and Helmholtz equations on the n-dimensional sphere.

desk verdict A genuinely new wavelet derivation and useful new closed forms, but the Green-function series needs a distributional framework and the main proof has an unjustified interchange. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03451 v1 pith:AUIVE6E6 submitted 2025-07-04 math.AP

Ilona Iglewska-Nowak , Piotr Stefaniak This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 42C4042B37
keywords sphericalwaveletsn-spheresPoissonequationHelmholtzGreenfunctionGegenbauerpolynomialsLaplace-Beltramioperatorcontinuouswavelettransform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the continuous spherical wavelet transform derived from approximate identities can produce analytical, not just numerical, solutions to the Poisson equation and the Helmholtz equation on the unit sphere in any dimension. The main result is that every classical solution can be written as a convolution of the right-hand side with a zonal Green function whose Gegenbauer coefficients are determined by the eigenvalues of the Laplace-Beltrami operator. For the Poisson equation and for Helmholtz parameters of the special form $a = L(n+L-1)$ with $L \notin \mathbb{Z}$, the Green function is rewritten as a double integral involving the Poisson kernel minus a finite polynomial sum, giving closed formulas. The paper also tabulates these closed Green functions for dimensions two through ten and for several positive, negative, and fractional values of $a$. The significance is that exact solution formulas on spheres of arbitrary dimension are rare, and closed forms for negative $a$ appear to be new.

What carries the argument

The central object is the zonal Green function $G$, a function of the angular distance on $S^n$ represented by its Gegenbauer expansion; the coefficients $1/(a - l(n+l-1))$ are chosen so that convolution inverts the Laplace-Beltrami operator, whose eigenvalues are $-l(n+l-1)$. The argument is carried by the continuous spherical wavelet transform based on approximate identities: applying $\Delta_* + a$ to the analyzing Poisson wavelet produces an admissible wavelet family, and the reconstruction formula converts the differential equation into a convolution with $G$. The closed-form part relies on the Poisson kernel identity $\Sigma_n p_r(\cos\theta) = \sum_{l=0}^\infty r^l \frac{\lambda+l}{\lambda} C_l^\lambda(\cos\theta)$ together with the integral identity $\int_0^1 R^{-(n+2L)} \int_0^R r^{n+L-2} r^l\, dr\, dR = -\frac{1}{(L-l)(n+L+l-1)}$, which reproduces the desired coefficient exactly.

What would settle it

For $n=2$ and $a=0$, set $t=1$ in the series (16): the $l$-th term is $-\frac{2l+1}{l(l+1)} \sim -2/l$, so the series diverges logarithmically and cannot be read as an ordinary pointwise sum. A decisive test is to verify the convolution identity $u = f*G$ in a specified distributional or Sobolev sense for smooth test data with known solutions; if the truncated convolutions do not converge to the exact solution in that norm, the claimed solution formula fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that if $f \in C(S^n)$ and $u \in C^2(S^n)$ solve $\Delta_* u + a u = f$ with $a$ not equal to any eigenvalue $l(n+l-1)$, then $u = f * G$, where $G$ is the zonal series $G = \sum_{l=0}^\infty \frac{1}{a - l(n+l-1)} \frac{\lambda+l}{\lambda} C_l^\lambda$, with $\lambda = (n-1)/2$ and $C_l^\lambda$ the Gegenbauer polynomials. For the Poisson equation with zero-mean data the same formula holds starting at $l=1$ with coefficient $-1/(l(n+l-1))$. For $a = L(n+L-1)$ with non-integer $L$, Theorem 4.3 expresses $G$ as a double integral of the Poisson kernel minus the first $L_0$ Gegenbauer terms, plus a finite rational correction; this is the mechanism that yields closed forms. The paper states that for tested cases these closed forms coincide with known Green functions, including the classical logarithmic kernel on $S^2$, and that the negative-$a$ cases have not appeared in closed form before.

Load-bearing premise

The formulas work only if the formal Gegenbauer series for $G$ is given a meaning beyond pointwise convergence, because at the north pole the series diverges logarithmically even in the classical two-dimensional Poisson case.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every dimension $n \ge 2$ and every $a$ that is not an eigenvalue, the Helmholtz solution on $S^n$ is given by a single convolution formula, so the problem is reduced to evaluating one zonal kernel.
  • For $a=0$ the Poisson Green function has explicit closed forms in dimensions $2$ through $10$, including the standard logarithmic kernel on the two-sphere.
  • For Helmholtz parameters $a = L(n+L-1)$ with integer $L$, the formula with the critical term removed gives the generalized Green function and reproduces previously known closed forms.
  • For negative $a$, such as $a = -3/4$ on $S^3$ or $a = -2$ on $S^4$, the closed forms in Table 4 are presented as new, with applications to telegraph and Klein-Gordon type equations.
  • The derivation provides an analytical alternative to numerical wavelet solvers, producing exact series and closed integrals rather than approximate solutions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the distributional interpretation of the Green series is made explicit and rigorous, the same wavelet-inversion trick should produce Green functions for other rotation-invariant operators on $S^n$, such as polyharmonic operators or fractional powers of $\Delta_*$.
  • The double-integral representation in Theorem 4.3 suggests a quadrature-based numerical evaluation that avoids summing the divergent Gegenbauer series, which would be stable away from the singular diagonal.
  • Since the integral representation is valid for all non-integer $L$, the tabulated closed forms could be extended systematically to arbitrary rational $a$ by symbolic integration.
  • Because the kernel is zonal, the method should extend to non-zonal right-hand sides through the paper's convolution framework, which already handles general $L^2$ functions by rotation-invariant kernels.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a wavelet-transform method for solving the Poisson and Helmholtz equations on the unit n-sphere. It derives convolution representations u = f * G with G given by a Gegenbauer series (Theorem 4.1) and gives a double-integral closed form for G when a = L(n+L-1) with L non-integer (Theorem 4.3), together with extensive tables of explicit formulas for n = 2,...,10 and various values of a. The method is based on the continuous spherical wavelet transform of the authors' earlier work, and the closed forms are claimed to coincide with known results by Szmytkowski for the positive integer resonance cases.

Significance. If the results are made rigorous, they would provide a new wavelet-based derivation of Green functions on spheres and give closed forms for Helmholtz parameters, in particular negative values of a, that have not been published before. The paper is unusual in offering analytical rather than numerical wavelet solutions, and the tabulated formulas are potentially valuable reference material. However, the manuscript's central analytical objects—the Green function series—are not functions in general, so the stated theorems are formal as written and require a distributional or Sobolev-space interpretation. The paper does supply explicit, verifiable formulas for many cases, which is a strength even where the proofs are incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (16) and the proof of Theorem 4.1] The series (16) defining G does not converge pointwise for n >= 2: at t = 1 the terms behave like l^{n-3}, and the zonal L^2 norm of partial sums behaves like sum l^{n-5}, which diverges for n >= 5. For n = 2 the series diverges logarithmically at t = 1. Thus G is not generally an ordinary function, and u = f * G in (15) is not a classical convolution between a continuous function and a function kernel. The proof's claim that 'L2-convergence of the triple integral is ensured' does not establish convergence of the final series (16). The manuscript must state the distributional or Sobolev framework in which (15) holds, and prove the identification of G with that object.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 4.3, Eqs. (24)-(26)] The interchange of the series (24) with the double integration in (23) is not justified. Although (24) converges absolutely for each r in [0,1), the integrated series is bounded by sum_l ((lambda+l)/lambda) |C_l^lambda(cos theta)| / l^2, which behaves like sum l^{n-3} for n >= 3 and diverges logarithmically for n = 2. Dominated convergence therefore fails. The equality of the double integral with the series should be proved in a distributional sense or by an explicit summation method (such as Abel summation), and this is essential to the validity of the closed-form formula (23).
  3. [Remark 4.2(3) and Corollary 4.4] The paper acknowledges in Remark 4.2(3) that [31] treats convergence of such series in spherical Sobolev spaces 'more precisely,' which indicates the gap is known to the authors. Corollary 4.4 inherits the same issue for integer L: the subtracted series (28) still fails to converge classically for n >= 2. The manuscript should either incorporate a Sobolev-space or distributional framework and prove the convolution statement in that framework, or explicitly state that all Green-function identities are understood distributionally and supply the corresponding convolution theorem for continuous f.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction, paragraph 2] The name 'Klein–Gordan' should be 'Klein–Gordon'.
  2. [Tables 3 and 4] The placement of the factor pi in the tabulated expressions is visually ambiguous, because it appears after a large fraction without a clear denominator; please reformat so that the formulas are unambiguous, for example with an explicit multiplication sign or by placing pi in the numerator or denominator consistently.
  3. [Definition 3.1] In condition (11), the l = 0 statement is written as an integral equal to zero; it would be clearer to say explicitly that the pair has zero mean, as is done in (12).
  4. [Proof of Theorem 4.1, last paragraph] The sentence 'If integral u is not 0 and a is not 0, it follows directly from (14)' skips the verification that the l = 0 mode of G is 1/a; adding one line showing that the constant mode is handled correctly would improve clarity.
  5. [Theorem 4.3] The notation L0 := max{[L], [-n-L+1]} with [x] denoting the integer part is functional but slightly terse; a short parenthetical explanation of why this choice of L0 removes the singular modes would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Green functions are derived by wavelet inversion and algebraic spectral evaluation, not assumed or fitted; self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorem 4.1 is self-contained in the relevant sense. The paper does not postulate u=f*G; it starts from the eigenfunction identity Δ*Y_l^k=-l(n+l-1)Y_l^k, forms the wavelet family Θρ=(Δ*+ā)Ψρ, and computes the Gegenbauer coefficients of G=∫Ψρ*Ωρ dρ/ρ as 1/(a-l(n+l-1))·(λ+l)/λ. This is a direct algebraic consequence of the chosen reconstruction wavelet, not an input fitted to the target solution. Theorem 4.3 is likewise an identity transformation: it rewrites the same spectral series using the Poisson-kernel expansion (13) and the elementary integral (26); the right-hand side of (23) is shown to equal the series (22), so no target conclusion is smuggled into the hypotheses. The paper's self-citations [22-26] supply background wavelet-transform definitions and inversion results, but those results do not contain the Green-function formula, and the tables are checked against independent sources ([13,12,31,37,38]). There is a genuine rigor gap, not a circularity: the paper does not state the distributional or Sobolev setting in which the series (16)/(22) converges, and the bound (27) does not justify the term-by-term integration in Theorem 4.3, since the absolute terms behave like l^(n-3) at t=1 and diverge for n≥5. The authors themselves acknowledge a related limitation in Remark 4.2(3), citing [31] for more precise convergence considerations. This gap affects correctness and rigor, but it does not make the derivation circular: the proof does not assume the theorem it is proving.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a pure mathematics paper. There are no parameters fitted to data; the central derivation relies on standard harmonic analysis and on the authors' previously published wavelet transform theory. The only contentious input is the unstated convergence mode for the Green-function series.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Hyperspherical harmonics are eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator: Delta*Y_l^k = -l(n+l-1)Y_l^k (Eq. 6).
    Cited to [35, Chapter II, Theorem 4.1]; this is the spectral foundation for the entire Green-function expansion.
  • standard math The spherical wavelet transform is invertible for zero-mean L2 functions with the admissible-pair condition (11).
    The paper cites [22, Theorem 3.2] for the convergence proof; this is previous published work by the first author, used as background.
  • standard math The Gegenbauer polynomial bound |C_l^lambda(cos theta)| <= (n+l-2)^{n-2} (Eq. 27) holds uniformly.
    Invoked to justify absolute convergence of the series (24) and term-by-term integration in Theorem 4.3; cited to [36, Theorem 7.33.1].
  • ad hoc to paper Convergence of the Green-function series (16)/(18) is not specified for n>=2; the paper assumes it defines an object suitable for convolution with continuous f.
    The paper does not state in what sense the series converges; the termwise integration in Theorem 4.3 depends on this unstated interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wavelet based solutions to the Poisson and the Helmholtz equations on the $n$-dimensional unit sphere." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AUIVE6E6

@misc{pith2026250703451,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wavelet based solutions to the Poisson and the Helmholtz equations on the $n$-dimensional unit sphere},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AUIVE6E6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03451}
}
abstract

We present a method of solving partial differential equations on the $n$-dimensional unit sphere using methods based on the continuous wavelet transform derived from approximate identities. We give an explicit analytical solution to the Poisson equation and to the Helmholtz equations. For the first one and for some special values of the parameter in the latter one, we derive a closed formula for the generalized Green function.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    Michel, Geomathematics – modelling and solving mathematical problems in geodesy and geo- physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2022,https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108297882

    V. Michel, Geomathematics – modelling and solving mathematical problems in geodesy and geo- physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2022,https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108297882

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108297882 2022

  2. [1]

    R. Amin, B. Alshahrani, M. Mahmoud, A.-H. Abdel-Aty, K. Shah, W. Deebanif, Haar wavelet method for solution of distributed order time-fractional differential equations, Alexandria Engineering J. 60(3), 3295–3303 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.039 2021

  3. [2]

    Antoine, P

    J.-P. Antoine, P. Vandergheynst, Wavelets on the 2-sphere: a group-theoretical approach , Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 7(3), 262–291 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1006/acha.1999.0272

    work page arXiv 1999

  4. [3]

    Antoine, P

    J.-P. Antoine, P. Vandergheynst, Wavelets on the n-sphere and related manifolds , J. Math. Phys. 39(8), 3987–4008 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532481

    work page doi:10.1063/1.532481 1998

  5. [4]

    Babiˇ c, M.B

    V.M. Babiˇ c, M.B. Kapileviˇ c, S.G. Mihlin, G.I. Natanson, P.M. Riz, L.N. Slobodecki˘i, M.M. Smirnov, Line ˘ ınye uravneniya matematiˇ cesko ˘ ı fiziki(Russian) [The linear equations of mathematical physics] Edited by S.G. Mihlin, Izdat. ”Nauka”, Moscow, 1964

    work page 1964

  6. [5]

    Balaji, G

    S. Balaji, G. Hariharan, A novel wavelet approximation method for the solution of nonlinear dif- ferential equations with variable coefficients arising in astrophysics , Astrophys Space Sci. 363(16) (2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3236-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-017-3236-3 2018

  7. [6]

    Bernstein, Spherical singular integrals, monogenic kernels and wavelets on the three– dimensional sphere, Adv

    S. Bernstein, Spherical singular integrals, monogenic kernels and wavelets on the three– dimensional sphere, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr. 19(2), 173–189 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00006-009-0149-4

    work page 2009

  8. [7]

    Ebert, S

    S. Ebert, S. Bernstein, P. Cerejeiras, U. K´ ahler,Nonzonal wavelets on S N , 18th International Confer- ence on the Application of Computer Science and Mathematics in Architecture and Civil Engineering, Weimar 2009, https://doi.org/10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2840

    work page doi:10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2840 2009

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Edelen, Helmhotz equation on the surface of the unit (N + 1)-sphere, J

    D.G.B. Edelen, Helmhotz equation on the surface of the unit (N + 1)-sphere, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 23, 99–109 (1968), https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(68)90117-0

    1968 doi

  2. [9]

    Fengler, A nonlinear Galerkin scheme involving vectorial and tensorial spherical wavelets for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation on the sphere , PAMM - Proc

    M.J. Fengler, A nonlinear Galerkin scheme involving vectorial and tensorial spherical wavelets for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation on the sphere , PAMM - Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 5, 457–458 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.200510205

    2005 doi

  3. [10]

    Frazier, An introduction to wavelets through linear algebra , Springer, New York, 1999, https: //doi.org/10.1007/b97841

    M.W. Frazier, An introduction to wavelets through linear algebra , Springer, New York, 1999, https: //doi.org/10.1007/b97841

    1999 doi

  4. [11]

    Freeden, T

    W. Freeden, T. Gervens, M. Schreiner, Constructive approximation on the sphere. With ap- plications to geomathematics , Clarendon Press, New York, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0013091500020836

    1998

  5. [12]

    Freeden, M

    W. Freeden, M. Gutting, Special functions of mathematical (geo-)physics , Applied and Numeri- cal Harmonic Analysis, Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-0348-0563-6

    2013

  6. [13]

    Freeden, M

    W. Freeden, M. Schreiner, Spherical functions of mathematical geosciences – a scalar, vectorial, and tensorial setup, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85112-7 W A VELET BASED SOLUTIONS TO THE POISSON AND THE HELMHOLTZ EQUATIONS ON THEn-DIMEN...

    2009 doi

  7. [14]

    Freeden, U

    W. Freeden, U. Windheuser, Combined spherical harmonic and wavelet expansion – a future concept in Earth’s gravitational determination , Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 4(1), 1–37 (1997), https: //doi.org/10.1006/acha.1996.0192

    1997

  8. [15]

    Freeden, U

    W. Freeden, U. Windheuser, Spherical wavelet transform and its discretization, Adv. Comput. Math. 5(1), 51–94 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02124735

    1996 doi

  9. [16]

    Gittelson, Adaptive wavelet methods for elliptic partial differential equations with random operators, Numer

    C.J. Gittelson, Adaptive wavelet methods for elliptic partial differential equations with random operators, Numer. Math. 126(3), 471–513 (2014), https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1. element.springer-1c047140-43e6-3ce6-b250-9d984995c541

    2014

  10. [17]

    Grebenitcharsky and M.G

    R. Grebenitcharsky and M.G. Sideris, Application of spherical pseudo-differential operators and spherical wavelets for numerical solutions of the fixed altimetry-gravimetry boundary value problem , V Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, 127, 242–251 (2004), https:...

    2004 doi

  11. [18]

    Gupta, S

    A.K. Gupta, S. Saha Ray Wavelet methods for solving fractional order differential equations , Math. Probl. Eng. (2014), https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/140453

    2014 doi

  12. [19]

    Hajji, S

    M.A. Hajji, S. Melkonian, R. Vaillancourt, Two-dimensional wavelet bases for partial differential operators and applications , Advances in pseudo-differential operators, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., 155, 219–233 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7840-1_13

    2004 doi

  13. [20]

    B. Han, M. Michelle, Y.S. Wong, Wavelet-based methods for numerical solutions of differential equa- tions, https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12192

    1909 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Hariharan, K

    G. Hariharan, K. Kannan, Haar wavelet method for solving some nonlinear parabolic equations , J. Math. Chem. 48(4), 1044–1061 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-010-9724-0

    2010 doi

  15. [22]

    Iglewska-Nowak, A continuous spherical wavelet transform for C(Rn), Appl

    I. Iglewska-Nowak, A continuous spherical wavelet transform for C(Rn), Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 47(3), 1033–1039 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2019.04.001

    2019 doi

  16. [23]

    Iglewska-Nowak, Continuous wavelet transforms on n-dimensional spheres , Appl

    I. Iglewska-Nowak, Continuous wavelet transforms on n-dimensional spheres , Appl. Comput. Har- mon. Anal. 39(2), 248–276 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2014.09.006

    2015 doi

  17. [24]

    Iglewska-Nowak, Directional wavelets on n-dimensional spheres , Appl

    I. Iglewska-Nowak, Directional wavelets on n-dimensional spheres , Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 44(2), 201–229 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2016.04.008

    2018 doi

  18. [25]

    Iglewska-Nowak, Frames of directional wavelets on n–dimensional spheres , Appl

    I. Iglewska-Nowak, Frames of directional wavelets on n–dimensional spheres , Appl. Comput. Har- mon. Anal. 43(1), 148–161 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2016.01.004

    2017 doi

  19. [26]

    Iglewska-Nowak, Poisson wavelets on n-dimensional spheres, J

    I. Iglewska-Nowak, Poisson wavelets on n-dimensional spheres, J. Fourier Anal. Appl.21(1), 206–227 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00041-014-9366-x

    2015 doi

  20. [27]

    S. Jaffard, Wavelets and analysis of partial differential equations , Probabilistic and stochas- tic methods in analysis, with applications, 372, 3–13 (1992), https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-94-011-2791-2_1

    1992

  21. [28]

    Lepik, H

    ¨U. Lepik, H. Hein, Haar wavelets , Mathematical Engineering. Springer Cham, 2014, https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-04295-4 22 ILONA IGLEWSKA-NOW AK AND PIOTR STEF ANIAK

    2014 doi

  22. [29]

    Mehra, N

    M. Mehra, N. K.-R. Kevlahan, An adaptive multilevel wavelet solver for elliptic equations on an optimal spherical geodesic grid , SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30(6), 3073–3086 (2008), https://doi.org/ 10.1137/070689607

    2008 doi

  23. [30]

    Mei, Q.S

    S.L. Mei, Q.S. Lu, S.W. Zhang, and L. Jin, Adaptive interval wavelet precise integration method for partial differential equations , Appl. Math. Mech. 26(3), 364–371 (2005), https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF02440087

    2005

  24. [32]

    Perrier, Towards a method for solving partial differential equations using wavelet bases , Wavelets

    V. Perrier, Towards a method for solving partial differential equations using wavelet bases , Wavelets. Inverse Probl. Theoret. Imaging, 269–283 (1989),https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97177-8_ 27

    1989 doi

  25. [33]

    Rehman, D

    M. Rehman, D. Baleanu, J. Alzabut, M. Ismail, U. Saeed, Green–Haar wavelets method for gen- eralized fractional differential equations , Adv. Difference Equ. (2020), https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13662-020-02974-6

    2020

  26. [34]

    J. Sun, X. Yi, B. Ye, and Y. Shen, Wavelet-Galerkin Solutions for Differential Equations , Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 3(4), 403–406 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02830037

    1998 doi

  27. [35]

    Shimakura, Partial differential operators of elliptic type , Translations of Mathematical Mono- graphs, Vol

    N. Shimakura, Partial differential operators of elliptic type , Translations of Mathematical Mono- graphs, Vol. 99, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, 1992

    1992

  28. [36]

    Szeg¨ o,Orthogonal polynomials, Fourth Edition, AMS Coll

    G. Szeg¨ o,Orthogonal polynomials, Fourth Edition, AMS Coll. Publ., Providence, Rhode Island, 1975

    1975

  29. [37]

    Szmytkowski, Closed form of the generalized Green ’s function for the Helmholtz operator on the two-dimensional unit sphere , J

    R. Szmytkowski, Closed form of the generalized Green ’s function for the Helmholtz operator on the two-dimensional unit sphere , J. Math. Phys. 47(6) (2006), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2203430

    2006 doi

  30. [38]

    Szmytkowski, Closed forms of the Green ’s function and the generalized Green ’s function for the Helmholtz operator on the N -dimensional unit sphere , J

    R. Szmytkowski, Closed forms of the Green ’s function and the generalized Green ’s function for the Helmholtz operator on the N -dimensional unit sphere , J. Phys. A 40(5), 995–1009 (2007), https: //doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/5/009

    2007 doi

  31. [39]

    Urban, Wavelet methods for elliptic partial differential equations, Numerical Mathematics and Sci- entific Computation

    K. Urban, Wavelet methods for elliptic partial differential equations, Numerical Mathematics and Sci- entific Computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780198526056.001.0001

    2009

  32. [40]

    N. Ja. Vilenkin, Special functions and the theory of group representations , in Translations of Math- ematical Monographs, Vol. 22, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R. I., 1968

    1968

  33. [41]

    L. Wang, Y. Ma, and Z. Meng, Haar wavelet method for solving fractional partial differential equa- tions numerically , Appl. Math. Comput. 227, 66–76 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc. 2013.11.004

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    S. Zhi, Y. Xu, and J. Zhao, Haar wavelets method for solving Poisson equations with jump conditions in irregular domain , Adv. Comput. Math. 42(4), 995–1012 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10444-015-9450-z W A VELET BASED SOLUTIONS TO THE POISSON AND THE HELMHOLTZ EQUATIONS ...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.