Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Controlling quantum phases with electric fields in one-dimensional Hubbard systems

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a step electric potential in a half-filled one-dimensional Hubbard chain produces three phases—Mott insulator, metal, and band insulator—with a metallic window that narrows as spin polarization increases.

desk verdict Useful DMRG map of the step-potential Hubbard chain, but the low-U metallic region contradicts the exact V=0 limit and needs fixing before the quantitative phase diagram can stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15449 v1 pith:AX62WNVD submitted 2025-05-21 cond-mat.str-el

D. Arisa , R. M. Dos Santos , Isaac M. Carvalho , Vivian V. França This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords quantumphasetransitionsHubbardmodelelectricfieldMottinsulatorbandmetallicchargeandspingapsentanglemententropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a spatially step-like electric potential can act as a switch between insulating and metallic behavior in a strongly correlated one-dimensional electron system. Using the half-filled Hubbard model, the authors identify three phases—Mott insulator, metal, and band-like insulator—and map their boundaries in the interaction-versus-field plane. The metallic phase is defined by the simultaneous closing of the charge and spin gaps and is marked by field-dependent kinetic energy and quasi-periodic oscillations in pairing and entanglement. The practical interest is that the metal appears in a controllable voltage window whose width can be tuned by spin polarization, which matters for designing field-driven quantum devices and for interpreting experiments on 1D materials and ultracold atoms.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the half-filled one-dimensional Hubbard Hamiltonian with a step potential, $$H=-t\sum_{j,\$\sigma$}(c^\dagger_{j\$\sigma$}c_{j+1\$\sigma$}+\mathrm{h.c.})+U\sum_j n_{j\uparrow}n_{j\downarrow}+V\sum_{j=1}^{L/2}(n_j-n_{j+L/2}),$$ which raises one half of the chain by $+V$ and lowers the other by $-V$. The argument runs on three diagnostics: the charge gap $\Delta_c$ and spin gap $\Delta_s$ extracted from ground-state energies with electron-number and spin-flip changes; the pairing response $\partial\bar{w}_2/\partial V$ and kinetic energy $\langle H_t\rangle$; and the entanglement entropy $S$ across the half-chain cut. Density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) ground states with bond dimension up to $2^{11}$ and energy convergence to $10^{-7}$ supply the numbers that place the phase boundaries.

What would settle it

Compute the charge gap at $V=0$ for $U/t=1$ and $U/t=2$ on chains of length $L=20,40,80,160$ and extrapolate to the thermodynamic limit; if the extrapolated gap is positive, the boundary $V_c=U/2-1.46t$ cannot cross $V=0$ at small $U$ and the low-$U$ metallic region is a finite-size artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On a half-filled one-dimensional Hubbard chain, applying a potential difference $V$ between the two halves of the chain produces three distinct ground-state phases. At small $V$ and large $U$ the system is a Mott insulator with a finite charge gap and no spin gap; at intermediate $V$ both charge and spin gaps vanish, the kinetic energy responds strongly to the field, and pairing response and half-chain entanglement oscillate quasi-periodically; at large $V$ the system becomes a band-like insulator with both gaps open and entanglement tending to zero. The phase boundaries are approximately linear in $U$, with $V_c^{\mathrm{Mott}\rightarrow\mathrm{metal}} = U/2 - 1.46t$ independent of magnetization and $V_c^{\mathrm{metal}\rightarrow\mathrm{band}} = U/2 + b(m)t$ with $b = 1.97, 1.43, 0.40$ for $m = 0, 0.25, 0.5$, so the metallic window shrinks as spin polarization increases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that finite-size DMRG data on chains up to 25 sites, together with a linear extrapolation of the Mott-to-metal boundary, correctly locate the phase boundaries for all interaction strengths and voltages, including the claim that the metal reaches down to $V=0$ for small $U$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a fixed interaction $U$, sweeping the voltage $V$ drives the system through insulator-metal-insulator transitions at the two predicted boundaries, so $V$ acts as a continuous external switch.
  • The onset voltage for metallicity, $V_c^{\mathrm{Mott}\rightarrow\mathrm{metal}} = U/2 - 1.46t$, does not depend on magnetization, so the $U$-versus-$V$ competition alone sets the Mott-to-metal threshold.
  • Higher spin polarization lowers $V_c^{\mathrm{metal}\rightarrow\mathrm{band}}$ and reduces the maximum transferred density, meaning fewer available opposite-spin pairs narrow the metallic window.
  • Inside the metallic phase both charge and spin excitations are gapless, which distinguishes it from the surrounding insulators and implies the phase is a conductor rather than a gapless spin-only state.
  • For very large $V$ the entanglement between halves tends to zero, so the band-insulator phase is characterized by effectively decoupled halves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims, if the linear Mott-to-metal boundary is trusted below the smallest computed $U$, the model becomes metallic at $V=0$ for $U \lesssim 2.92t$; this conflicts with the known exponentially small but nonzero Mott gap of the half-filled Hubbard chain at $V=0$, so the low-$U$ portion of the phase diagram likely requires either a re-entrant insulating sliver or a soft crossover
  • The quasi-periodic oscillations in pairing and entanglement suggest the metallic phase has a field-induced modulated charge structure; computing the Drude weight or the single-particle spectral function across $V$ would test whether this phase is a conventional conductor or a fluctuating charge-density-wave-like state.
  • The same step-potential construction could be realized in optical lattices with a superlattice potential or in one-dimensional materials with a gate-defined junction, and the predicted shrinking of the metallic window with polarization could be tested by measuring conductance as a function of spin imbalance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the half-filled one-dimensional Hubbard chain with a step-like electrostatic potential of magnitude V between the two halves, using DMRG for chains up to L=25. It computes the charge density on the low-potential half, the pairing response ∂w̄2/∂V, the charge and spin gaps, kinetic energy, and half-chain entanglement for U/t up to 10 and magnetizations m=0, 0.25, 0.5. The authors identify three phases — Mott insulator, metal, and band-like insulator — and propose linear phase boundaries V_c^{Mott→metal}=U/2−1.46t and V_c^{metal→band}=U/2+b(m)t with b={1.97,1.43,0.40} for m={0,0.25,0.5}. The metallic phase is characterized by vanishing charge and spin gaps and by quasi-periodic oscillations in the pairing response and entanglement.

Significance. If the phase diagram were established, the paper would provide a simple quantitative description of electric-field-driven quantum phase transitions in a strongly correlated 1D system, with testable predictions for cold-atom or 1D-material realizations. The work combines several complementary diagnostics (density, pairing response, gaps, kinetic energy, entanglement) and reports careful DMRG convergence (bond dimension up to 2^11, energy convergence to 10^-7), which strengthens confidence in the numerical data themselves. However, the central quantitative claim is not yet secure: the low-U portion of the phase diagram rests on an extrapolation that contradicts the exact V=0 Hubbard result, and the finite-size scaling underlying the metallic gap closure is documented only for one parameter point.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, Fig. 3] The low-U part of the phase diagram is in direct conflict with an exact result. At V=0 the Hamiltonian (1) reduces to the standard half-filled 1D Hubbard model, for which the Lieb-Wu solution gives a positive charge gap for every U>0 (exponentially small as U→0). The fitted line V_c^{Mott→metal}=U/2−1.46t crosses V_c=0 at U=2.92t, so the paper's phase diagram predicts a metallic state at V=0 for U<2.92t. This is likely a finite-size artifact: with L≤25 the exponentially small gap is below the DMRG energy resolution, and the linear decay in 1/L shown in the inset of Fig. 2 is demonstrated only at U=10t, V=4t, not at V=0 for small U. The authors should either remove the extrapolation to V≤0, restrict the phase diagram to U values where the V=0 gap is resolved, or provide a finite-size scaling of Δc at V=0 for small U that is consistent with the exact result.
  2. [Results, Figs. 2 and 3] The metallic-gap claim and the fitted phase boundaries are not supported by a documented finite-size extrapolation. The inset of Fig. 2 reports a linear decay in L, but no system sizes or extrapolated intercept are given, and the fit range, number of points, and uncertainties for the linear boundaries in Fig. 3 are not reported. In particular, the line V_c^{Mott→metal}=U/2−1.46t is drawn for U≲3t where no data are shown; this is the extrapolation that creates the V=0 metallic region. The authors should provide the DMRG data points, the fit intervals, and confidence intervals for all fitted parameters, and restrict the lines to the fitted U range.
  3. [Model and Methods; footnote [54]] For m>0 the charge gap is undefined, and the phase boundaries are inferred from the observables in Fig. 1. The paper does not state a quantitative criterion for locating V_c from n(−V) or ∂w2/∂V, nor does it give the associated uncertainty. Since the narrowing of the metallic window with m is a main result, the criterion should be explicit (e.g., threshold derivative, peak position) and its robustness to the choice of criterion should be demonstrated.
  4. [Results, Figs. 1(b), 1(c), and 4] The quasi-periodic oscillations claimed to accompany the metallic phase are not quantified. No period, amplitude, or system-size dependence is reported, so it is unclear whether the oscillations are intrinsic or finite-size effects of the abrupt potential step on short chains. A finite-size analysis of the oscillation period would be needed before presenting this as a characteristic of the metallic regime.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] In the abstract, 'analyzingi)' should read 'analyzing (i)'.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption text 'e V/t=4' should read 'V/t=4'.
  3. [Footnote [51]] Footnote [51] introduces ferromagnetic insulating states inside the band-like regime, but the main text and Fig. 3 label the phase simply as 'band'; the terminology should be harmonized.
  4. [Model and Methods] The paper says 'system sizes of up to 25 sites' but never states which L values are used for each figure; please list them, since the finite-size claims depend on this.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phase diagram is a transparent fit to the paper's own DMRG gap and density data, not an independent prediction derived from its inputs.

full rationale

The paper reports finite-size DMRG results and explicitly presents the phase boundaries as fits to its own data: 'Symbols are numerical data, while lines represent their linear fits.' The phases are classified by computed observables — charge and spin gaps, n(−V), pairing response, and entanglement — and the phase diagram is a summary of those computations, not a derived prediction that could reduce to its inputs by construction. The formula V_c(Mott→metal)=U/2−1.46t is a linear fit to the computed critical points, and the paper does not dress this fit as a first-principles derivation. The footnote that for m>0 the charge gap is undefined and boundaries are inferred from Fig. 1 is an operational proxy, not a circular redefinition: it extrapolates the same observed charge-transfer/pairing criterion across magnetizations. Self-citations (refs. 3–8, 36, 43–44) provide background on Hubbard physics and entanglement diagnostics; none is load-bearing for the central computation, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. A genuine concern is the low-U extrapolation of the Mott–metal line to values where V_c<0, which would imply a metallic state at V=0 for U≲2.92t, in tension with the exact Lieb–Wu result of a finite Mott gap for every U>0; this is a correctness or finite-size extrapolation risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on DMRG simulations and on fitted phase boundaries. There are five fitted parameters (two intercepts, one shared slope, and two magnetization-dependent offsets) and several domain assumptions that are standard for DMRG studies. The most fragile assumptions are the extrapolation to V=0 for small U and the indirect phase-boundary inference for m>0.

free parameters (5)
  • Mott-metal boundary intercept = -1.46t
    Linear fit to DMRG critical V values; slope shared with the metal-band line.
  • Metal-band boundary intercept b(0) = 1.97t
    Fit for m=0.
  • Metal-band boundary intercept b(0.25) = 1.43t
    Fit for m=0.25.
  • Metal-band boundary intercept b(0.5) = 0.40t
    Fit for m=0.5.
  • Phase boundary slope = 1/2 (units of t)
    Slope of both phase boundaries, reported as a linear fit without uncertainty.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DMRG converges to exact ground states for L <= 25 with bond dimension up to 2^11 and energy convergence to 10^-7
    Methods section. Standard DMRG assumption; no independent verification.
  • domain assumption Charge and spin gaps defined via ground-state energy differences correctly classify phases
    Equations (2) and (3). Standard in 1D.
  • ad hoc to paper The metallic phase at V=0 for U < 2.92t exists despite the known finite Mott gap of the half-filled Hubbard model
    The linear fit Vc = U/2 - 1.46t is extrapolated to V < 0; the exponentially small Mott gap at small U is not discussed. This is an unverified, load-bearing extrapolation.
  • ad hoc to paper Phase boundaries for m > 0 can be inferred from charge density and pairing response because the charge gap is undefined for Sz > 0
    Footnote [54]. The gap definition in Eq. (2) uses Sz=0 states; for m>0 the boundaries are inferred from Fig. 1, not from gaps.
  • ad hoc to paper The quasi-periodic oscillations in pairing response and entanglement are physical and not finite-size artifacts
    Results section. No scaling or Fourier analysis supports the quasi-periodic claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Controlling quantum phases with electric fields in one-dimensional Hubbard systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AX62WNVD

@misc{pith2026250515449,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Controlling quantum phases with electric fields in one-dimensional Hubbard systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AX62WNVD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15449}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum systems under electric fields provide a powerful framework for uncovering and controlling novel quantum phases, especially in low-dimensional systems with strong correlations. In this work, we investigate quantum phase transitions induced by an electric potential difference in a one-dimensional half-filled Hubbard chain. By analyzing (i) tunneling and pairing mechanisms, (ii) charge and spin gaps, and (iii) entanglement between the chain halves, we identify three distinct phases: Mott insulator, metal and band-like insulator. The metallic regime, characterized by the closing of both charge and spin gaps, is accompanied by a field-dependent kinetic energy and a quasi-periodic oscillatory behavior of pairing response and entanglement. Although the metallic phase persists for different magnetizations, its extent in the phase diagram shrinks as spin polarization increases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15449 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Average charge density n (−V ) in the lower-potential region, (b) pairing response ∂w¯2/∂V , and (c) kinetic energy ⟨Ht⟩/t as a function of the electric potential V for different interactions U and magnetizations m. 0 2 4 U/t = 0.0 0 2 4 U/t = 1.0 0 2 4 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 U/t = 2.0 U/t = 3.0 U/t = 6.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 U/t = 10.0 0.0 0.1 0 3 ∆c/t ∆s/t Gap V/t V/t ∆c/t 1/L [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows the resulting phase diagram in the U − V plane for distinct values of magnetization [54]. According to the above discussion, the transition line V Mott→metal c 0 2 4 6 8 10 U/t 0 2 4 6 8 10 V/t Mott c > 0 s = 0 Metal c = 0 s = 0 Band c > 0 s > 0 m = 0.0 m = 0.25 m = 0.5 metal-band Mott-metal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Entanglement between the two halves of the chain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Goychuk and P

    I. Goychuk and P. Hänggi, Quantum dynamics in strong fluctuating fields, Advances in Physics 54, 525 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730500429701

    work page doi:10.1080/00018730500429701 2005

  2. [2]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. Hänggi, and P. Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and appli- cations, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 771 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    V. V. França, D. Hörndlein, and A. Buchleitner, Fulde- ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov critical polarization in one- dimensional fermionic optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A86, 033622 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    G. A. Canella and V. V. França, Superfluid-insulator transition unambiguously detected by entanglement in one-dimensional disordered superfluids, Scientific Re- ports 9, 10.1038/s41598-019-51986-0 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51986-0 2019

  5. [5]

    G. A. Canella and V. V. França, Entanglement in disor- dered superfluids: The impact of density, interaction and harmonic confinement on the superconductor–insulator transition, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Ap- plications 545, 123646 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    D.ArisaandV.V.França,Linearmappingbetweenmag- netic susceptibility and entanglement in conventional and exotic one-dimensional superfluids, Physical Review B 101, 10.1103/physrevb.101.214522 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.214522 2020

  7. [7]

    G. A. Canella, K. Zawadzki, and V. V. França, Effects of temperature and magnetization on the mott–anderson physics in one-dimensional disordered systems, Scientific Reports 12, 10.1038/s41598-022-12561-2 (2022). 5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12561-2 2022

  8. [8]

    G. A. Canella and V. V. França, Mott-anderson metal- insulator transitions from entanglement, Phys. Rev. B 104, 134201 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Zheng, Exact solution ofu → ∞1d hubbard model in electric field, Physics Letters A394, 127112 (2021)

    Y. Zheng, Exact solution ofu → ∞1d hubbard model in electric field, Physics Letters A394, 127112 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    A. V. Joura, J. K. Freericks, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Long- lived nonequilibrium states in the hubbard model with an electric field, Phys. Rev. B91, 245153 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    J. Li, C. Aron, G. Kotliar, and J. E. Han, Electric- field-driven resistive switching in the dissipative hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 226403 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Bellomia, C

    G. Bellomia, C. Mejuto-Zaera, M. Capone, and A. Amar- icci, Quasilocal entanglement across the mott-hubbard transition, Phys. Rev. B109, 115104 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Giamarchi, Quantum physics in one dimension, Vol

    T. Giamarchi, Quantum physics in one dimension, Vol. 121 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003)

    2003

  6. [14]

    Giamarchi, One-dimensional physics in the 21st cen- tury, Comptes Rendus

    T. Giamarchi, One-dimensional physics in the 21st cen- tury, Comptes Rendus. Physique17, 322 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Jardine, J

    M. Jardine, J. Stenger, Y. Jiang, E. J. de Jong, W. Wang, A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, and S. Frolov, Integrating mi- cromagnets and hybrid nanowires for topological quan- tum computing, SciPost Physics 11, 10.21468/scipost- phys.11.5.090 (2021)

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    Baydin, F

    A. Baydin, F. Tay, J. Fan, M. Manjappa, W. Gao, and J. Kono, Carbon nanotube devices for quantum technol- ogy, Materials15, 1535 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    E. A. Laird, F. Kuemmeth, G. A. Steele, K. Grove- Rasmussen, J. Nygård, K. Flensberg, and L. P. Kouwen- hoven, Quantum transport in carbon nanotubes, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 703–764 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Qu, B.-B

    D.-W. Qu, B.-B. Chen, H.-C. Jiang, Y. Wang, and W. Li, Spin-triplet pairing induced by near-neighbor attraction in the extended hubbard model for cuprate chain, Com- munications Physics 5, 257 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    T. Tang, B. Moritz, C. Peng, Z.-X. Shen, and T. P. Devereaux, Traces of electron-phonon coupling in one- dimensional cuprates, Nature Communications14, 3129 (2023)

    2023

  12. [21]

    Xie, A.-P

    H.Wang, H.S.Wang, C.Ma, L.Chen, C.Jiang, C.Chen, X. Xie, A.-P. Li, and X. Wang, Graphene nanoribbons for quantum electronics, Nature Reviews Physics3, 791–802 (2021)

    2021

  13. [22]

    Li, X.-Y

    Y. Li, X.-Y. Yang, Y. Feng, Z.-Y. Yuan, and B.-L. Su, One-dimensional metal oxide nanotubes, nanowires, nanoribbons, andnanorods: Synthesis, characterizations, properties and applications, Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences37, 1–74 (2012)

    2012

  14. [23]

    Alfieri, S

    A. Alfieri, S. B. Anantharaman, H. Zhang, and D. Jariwala, Nanomaterials for quantum informa- tion science and engineering, Advanced Materials 35, 10.1002/adma.202109621 (2022)

    2022 doi

  15. [24]

    Balcerzak and K

    T. Balcerzak and K. Szałowski, Hubbard pair cluster in the external fields. studies of the chemical potential, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 468, 252 (2017)

    2017

  16. [25]

    Balcerzak and K

    T. Balcerzak and K. Szałowski, Hubbard pair cluster in the external fields. studies of the polarization and sus- ceptibility, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Ap- plications 512, 1069 (2018)

    2018

  17. [26]

    V. P. Villegas and C. D. Villagonzalo, Optimal polariza- tion and susceptibility profiles of a half-filled open mag- netoelectric fermi-hubbard optical dimer, Physics Letters A 525, 129898 (2024)

    2024

  18. [27]

    Hasegawa, Nonextensive thermodynamics of the two- sitehubbardmodel,PhysicaA:StatisticalMechanicsand its Applications 351, 273 (2005)

    H. Hasegawa, Nonextensive thermodynamics of the two- sitehubbardmodel,PhysicaA:StatisticalMechanicsand its Applications 351, 273 (2005)

    2005

  19. [28]

    Hasegawa, Thermal entanglement of hubbard dimers in the nonextensive statistics, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications390, 1486 (2011)

    H. Hasegawa, Thermal entanglement of hubbard dimers in the nonextensive statistics, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications390, 1486 (2011)

    2011

  20. [29]

    S. R. Manmana, V. Meden, R. M. Noack, and K. Schönhammer, Quantum critical behavior of the one- dimensional ionic hubbard model, Physical Review B70, 10.1103/physrevb.70.155115 (2004)

    2004 doi

  21. [30]

    Gerster, M

    M. Gerster, M. Rizzi, F. Tschirsich, P. Silvi, R. Fazio, and S. Montangero, Superfluid density and quasi-long-range order in the one-dimensional disordered bose–hubbard model, New Journal of Physics18, 015015 (2016)

    2016

  22. [31]

    A. J. Millis and H. Monien, Pseudogaps in one- dimensional models with quasi-long-range order, Phys. Rev. B 61, 12496 (2000)

    2000

  23. [32]

    Kuklov, N

    A. Kuklov, N. Prokof’ev, L. Radzihovsky, and B. Svis- tunov, Transverse quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. B 109, L100502 (2024)

    2024

  24. [33]

    I. M. Carvalho, H. Bragança, W. H. Brito, and M. C. O. Aguiar, Formation of spin and charge ordering in the extended hubbard model during a finite-time quantum quench, Phys. Rev. B106, 195405 (2022)

    2022

  25. [34]

    A. L. S. Ribeiro, P. McClarty, P. Ribeiro, and M. We- ber, Dissipation-induced long-range order in the one- dimensional bose-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115145 (2024)

    2024

  26. [35]

    Grüner, The dynamics of charge-density waves, Rev

    G. Grüner, The dynamics of charge-density waves, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1129 (1988)

    1988

  27. [36]

    Sanino, I

    M. Sanino, I. M. Carvalho, and V. V. França, Entangle- ment as a topological marker in harmonically confined attractivefermi-hubbardchains(2024),arXiv:2412.20515 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    F. H. Essler, H. Frahm, F. Göhmann, A. Klümper, and V. E. Korepin,The one-dimensional Hubbard model (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    2005

  29. [38]

    A. E. Feiguin and F. Heidrich-Meisner, Pairing states of a polarized fermi gas trapped in a one-dimensional optical lattice, Phys. Rev. B76, 220508 (2007)

    2007

  30. [39]

    Hohenadler and H

    M. Hohenadler and H. Fehske, Density waves in strongly correlated quantum chains, The European Physical Jour- nal B 91, 204 (2018)

    2018

  31. [40]

    Ejima and S

    S. Ejima and S. Nishimoto, Phase diagram of the one- dimensional half-filled extended hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 216403 (2007)

    2007

  32. [41]

    Ejima, F

    S. Ejima, F. Gebhard, and S. Nishimoto, Tomonaga- luttinger parameters and spin excitations in the dimer- ized extended hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B74, 245110 (2006)

    2006

  33. [42]

    Islam, R

    R. Islam, R. Ma, P. M. Preiss, M. Eric Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, and M. Greiner, Measuring entanglement en- tropy in a quantum many-body system, Nature 528, 77–83 (2015)

    2015

  34. [43]

    Pauletti, M

    T. Pauletti, M. Silva, G. Canella, and V. França, Lin- ear entropy fails to predict entanglement behavior in low-density fermionic systems, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications644, 129824 (2024)

    2024

  35. [44]

    V. V. França, Entanglement and exotic superfluidity in spin-imbalanced lattices, Physica A: Statistical Mechan- 6 ics and its Applications475, 82 (2017)

    2017

  36. [45]

    Laflorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Physics Reports646, 1 (2016), quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems

    N. Laflorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Physics Reports646, 1 (2016), quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems

    2016

  37. [46]

    Laurell, A

    P. Laurell, A. Scheie, E. Dagotto, and D. A. Tennant, Witnessing entanglement and quantum correlations in condensed matter: A review, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies n/a, 2400196 (2024), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.202400196

    2024 doi

  38. [47]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Entan- glement in many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 517 (2008)

    2008

  39. [48]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalizationgroups,Phys.Rev.Lett. 69,2863(1992)

    1992

  40. [49]

    Phys.326, 96 (2011)

    U.Schollwöck,Thedensity-matrixrenormalizationgroup in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys.326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  41. [50]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations (2020), arXiv:2007.14822

    2020 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Notice that form ̸= 0, the band-like regime actually con- tains both band-like and ferromagnetic insulating states, due to the spin-imbalanced populations

  43. [52]

    Rigol and A

    M. Rigol and A. Muramatsu, Ground-state properties of hard-core bosons confined on one-dimensional optical lat- tices, Phys. Rev. A72, 013604 (2005)

    2005

  44. [53]

    Rigol and A

    M. Rigol and A. Muramatsu, Universal properties of hard-core bosons confined on one-dimensional lattices, Phys. Rev. A70, 031603 (2004)

    2004

  45. [54]

    1, which are also consistent with them = 0 case

    Since the charge gap is undefined form >0, the metal- lic boundaries are inferred from Fig. 1, which are also consistent with them = 0 case

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.