Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Consistent Selection of the Number of Groups in Panel Models via Cross-Validation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.05474 v4 pith:AZ3BQAJW submitted 2022-09-12 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords datamethodgrouppanelfoldmodelsnumberadvantages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Group number selection is a key problem for group panel data modeling. In this work, we develop a cross-validation (CV) method to tackle this problem. Specifically, we split the panel data into two data folds on the time span with a buffer zone, with group structure preserved for individuals. We first estimate the group memberships and parameters on one data fold, then plug in the estimates and utilize the other data fold to evaluate a designed criterion. Subsequently, the group number is estimated by minimizing the average criterion across all data folds. The proposed CV method has two advantages compared to existing approaches. First, the method is totally data-driven; thus no further model-specific tuning parameters are involved. Second, the method can be flexibly applied to a wide range of panel data models. Theoretically, we establish the estimation consistency by taking advantage of the optimization process on the training data fold. Experiments are carried out with a variety of synthetic datasets and panel models to further illustrate the advantages of the proposed method. Lastly, the CV method is employed to analyze the heterogeneous patterns of stock volatilities in the Chinese stock market during the 2008 financial crisis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing Clustered Equal Predictive Ability with Unknown Clusters

    econ.EM 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A selective inference test for clustered equal predictive ability that is valid when clusters are estimated by panel k-means.

Pith tools