Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 39 references

The equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture and coarse embedding

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture—injectivity of the equivariant higher index map—holds for a bounded-geometry space when both its group-quotient and its symmetry group coarsely embed into Hilbert space.

desk verdict A real extension of the equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture, but the bounded-distortion hypothesis is not well-defined for non-free actions, so the main theorem is narrower than stated. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00529 v2 pith:B2N5HV53 submitted 2019-09-02 math.KT math.OA

Benyin Fu , Xianjin Wang , Guoliang Yu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.KTmath.OA MSC 19K5658J2246L80
keywords equivariantcoarseNovikovconjecturehigherindexRoealgebralocalizationembeddingintoHilbertspaceboundeddistortionRipscomplexK-theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to prove the equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture for a discrete metric space X with bounded geometry whenever a countable group Γ acts on X properly, isometrically, and with bounded distortion, and both the quotient X/Γ and Γ coarsely embed into a Hilbert space. The conjecture says that the equivariant higher index map from equivariant K-homology of Rips complexes to the K-theory of the equivariant Roe algebra is injective. Injectivity matters because it turns a computable K-theory class into a reliable nonvanishing obstruction: if the class of an elliptic operator is nonzero, the operator cannot be deformed away, and for spin manifolds this obstructs invariant metrics of uniformly positive scalar curvature. The proof works by reduction to localization algebras, then compares ordinary and projected localization through the two coarse embeddings, using an Eilenberg swindle step that is where bounded distortion is needed.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the equivariant π-localization algebra C^*_{π,L}(P_d(X))^Γ, the algebra of uniformly continuous paths into the equivariant Roe algebra whose propagation, measured after quotient projection π, decays to zero, together with its twisted counterparts C^*(P_d(X), A(H,ξ)⊗A(H,η))^Γ built from the coarse embeddings of X/Γ and Γ. The quotient embedding ξ controls the decay of projected propagation and supplies the twisted Roe algebra through which the evaluation map becomes an isomorphism (Proposition 3.12); the group embedding η produces a Γ-proper C*-algebra over a continuous field of Hilbert spaces, and the bounded-distortion hypothesis guarantees that certain orbit-translated simplex families used in the Eilenberg swindle stay uniformly bounded and invariant under finite subgroups. The final step is the periodicity map from C(Z)-coefficient localization algebras to A(H)-twisted ones.

What would settle it

Take a concrete non-cocompact case covered by the theorem, such as Γ=Z acting by translation on X=Z×Z with an appropriate bounded-geometry metric for which X/Γ≅Z and Γ both coarsely embed into Hilbert space and bounded distortion holds with respect to a fundamental domain, then compute the direct-limit equivariant higher index map directly: any nonzero class in lim_d K_*^Z(P_d(X)) must have nonzero image in K_*(C^*(X)^Z). Finding such a class with vanishing image would refute Theorem 1.2; verifying that no such class exists in a family of these actions would support it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 1.2: under the stated hypotheses, Ind^Γ: lim_{d→∞} K_*^Γ(P_d(X)) → K_*(C^*(X)^Γ) is injective. The proof first replaces the equivariant higher index map with the evaluation map from an equivariant localization algebra to the equivariant Roe algebra, whose injectivity is equivalent (Theorem 2.11). It then introduces an equivariant π-localization algebra where propagation is measured after projection to X/Γ; the coarse embedding of X/Γ makes the evaluation map from this algebra injective (Theorem 3.13). The coarse embedding of Γ enters through a proper affine action on a continuous field of Hilbert spaces, giving a twisted algebra A(H,η); Theorem 4.9 shows that with bounded distortion the localization and π-localization versions of the twice-twisted algebra have isomorphic K-theory, Theorem 4.10 yields injectivity of the comparison map, and the periodicity isomorphism (Theorem 5.1) completes the diagram. Bounded distortion appears in Theorem 4.9, where it ensures the sets Γ·Δ'_j(R) are uniformly bounded and the simplices Δ_j(S) are F_i-invariant, which makes the Eilenberg swindle work.

Load-bearing premise

The proof collapses if the action does not have bounded distortion: for some group element γ, the displacement sup_{x∈Y} d(γx,x) over a chosen fundamental domain Y must be finite, and this finiteness is used to keep the orbit-translated simplices bounded enough for the Eilenberg swindle to run.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a complete spin manifold M with bounded geometry and a proper, isometric, bounded-distortion action of Γ on an invariant ε-net X, a nonzero class φ_*([D]) in lim_d K_*^Γ(P_d(X)) rules out any Γ-invariant Riemannian metric of uniformly positive scalar curvature (Corollary 1.3).
  • When Γ is trivial, Theorem 1.2 reduces to the classical coarse Novikov conjecture for spaces coarsely embeddable into Hilbert space; when X=Γ, it recovers the known result for groups that coarsely embed into Hilbert space.
  • The injectivity result makes the equivariant higher index an algorithmically usable invariant, because the domain lim_d K_*^Γ(P_d(X)) and the push-forward class are computable in the stated setting.
  • The theorem extends the reach of the equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture from cocompact actions, where the equivariant Roe algebra is Morita equivalent to the reduced group C*-algebra, to many non-cocompact actions as long as the quotient is coarsely embeddable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's reliance on bounded distortion is tied to a chosen fundamental domain, and the condition is not shown to be invariant under that choice; one could test whether a weaker, choice-independent condition—such as uniform displacement on orbits after passing to a metric quotient—would suffice for the same Eilenberg swindle.
  • The structure suggests a template: if a quotient's coarse geometry controls propagation and the symmetry group's coarse embedding supplies enough Bott-type twisting, injectivity of the equivariant index may persist in other targets than Hilbert space, such as uniformly convex Banach spaces, wherever an analogue of the periodicity isomorphism holds.
  • One might try replacing bounded distortion by a bound on displacement only along a generating set of Γ; if the Eilenberg swindle still closes, the theorem would cover a larger class of non-cocompact actions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves an equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture: for a countable discrete group Γ acting properly, isometrically, and with bounded distortion on a bounded-geometry discrete metric space X, if both X/Γ and Γ coarsely embed into Hilbert space, then the equivariant higher index map Ind^Γ from lim_d K^Γ_*(P_d(X)) to K_*(C^*(X)^Γ) is injective (Theorem 1.2). The proof uses equivariant localization algebras, π-localization algebras defined via the quotient coarse embedding, twisted equivariant Roe algebras using both the quotient and group coarse embeddings, Bott periodicity, Mayer-Vietoris sequences, and Eilenberg swindle arguments. The main theorem is applied to show nonvanishing of equivariant higher indices of Dirac operators and hence obstructions to Γ-invariant metrics of uniformly positive scalar curvature (Corollary 1.3).

Significance. If the result is correct, it is a substantial equivariant extension of Yu's coarse Baum-Connes theorem, covering a broad class of non-cocompact actions under natural coarse embeddability hypotheses. The paper relies on established machinery and on the authors' earlier work [7], and it gives a clearly stated injectivity criterion that is potentially algorithmic for nonvanishing of equivariant higher indices. The architecture of the proof is coherent, and the use of twisted equivariant localization algebras is well motivated. However, the central theorem's hypothesis and several load-bearing proof steps need careful revision before the result can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, definition of fundamental domain and Theorem 1.2] The definition of a fundamental domain as a subset Y with X = ⊔_{γ∈Γ} γY forces the Γ-action to be free: any point with nontrivial stabilizer would lie in both eY and γY for a nontrivial γ in its stabilizer. Yet the paper explicitly works with non-free actions elsewhere: Definition 2.3 concerns finite subgroups F, Proposition 2.6 covers cocompact actions without a freeness assumption, the proof of Theorem 4.9 uses spaces Γ ×_{F_i} S_i for finite subgroups F_i, and the Bott map in Section 5 averages over stabilizers Γ_x. Consequently the hypothesis "with bounded distortion" in Theorem 1.2 is undefined for every action with nontrivial isotropy, which is a genuine scope gap in the central theorem. In addition, the definition depends on a choice of Y, and the paper does not state whether bounded distortion is required for some or for all fundamental domains, nor prove independence of the choice. Please either restrict Theorem 1.2 (and Corollary 1.3) to free actions or reformulate bounded distortion using a Borel or measurable fundamental domain and supply the additional estimates needed in the proof of Theorem 4.9.
  2. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 4.9] The reduction from C*_L(P_d(X), A(H,ξ)_{O_{r,k}} ⊗ (A_n)_{Γ×_{F_i}S_i})^Γ to the product over C*_L(\tilde F_i · Δ'_j(R), ...)^{F_i} is asserted with the phrases "it is not very difficult to prove" and "in a way similar to the proof of Lemma 5.16 in [30]", after the statement that A_n is Γ-proper over Γ ×_{F_i} S_i. These identifications are load-bearing because they are what allow the Eilenberg swindle on the simplices Δ_j(S). The subsequent claim that the bounded-distortion hypothesis makes \tilde F_i · Δ'_j(R) uniformly bounded for j ∈ J_k is also stated as "easy to prove"; this estimate is exactly where the new bounded-distortion condition enters, and it must be shown explicitly. Please expand this part of the proof with full details.
  3. [Theorem 5.1] The proof of Theorem 5.1 consists of the assertion that the Mayer-Vietoris sequence, the five lemma, induction on skeleta of P_d(X), and Bott periodicity in the 0-dimensional case suffice. This is too compressed for a step on which Theorem 1.2 directly depends: the Mayer-Vietoris/five-lemma argument requires showing that the Bott map (β_L)_* is compatible with the six-term exact sequences for the localization algebras, and the 0-dimensional equivariant case, including the averaging over the stabilizer 1/|Γ_x| in the definition of β_t, is not carried out. Please provide the details or a precise reference for this equivariant Bott isomorphism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, Definition 3.1] The notation is inconsistent: the algebra of functions is first called C*_{π,L}(X)^Γ and then the same symbol is reused for its norm closure; presumably the first object should be C*_{π,L,alg}(X)^Γ.
  2. [Throughout] There are repeated grammatical slips, such as "an coarse embedding" (Propositions 3.12, 3.13 and Theorem 4.9), "bounded geometrical metric space" (proofs of Proposition 3.12 and Theorem 4.9), "distorsion" (proof of Theorem 4.9), "Lipchitz" (Definition 3.3), and "Let (C0(X), Γ,φ) is an admissible covariant system" (Proposition 2.6). These should be corrected.
  3. [Section 2, after Definition 2.7] The sentence "There is no difficulty to check" (and later "it is no difficult to see") is a stylistic slip; it should read "There is no difficulty in checking" or "It is not difficult to see".
  4. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 4.9] The definition of A_n as a direct limit of ideals that are Γ-proper over cocompact Γ-spaces is not fully explained; in particular, the notion of "Γ-proper over W" should be defined or referenced precisely, since it is used in the reduction to Γ ×_{F_i} S_i.
  5. [Section 5, definition of β_t] The notation Y_d is introduced as "a fundamental domain of X_d" and then used with x ∈ Y_d and y ∈ X_d; this inherits the free-action issue from Section 1 and should be reconciled with the stabilizer-averaging formula 1/|Γ_x| that appears in the same definition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the proof reduces injectivity of the equivariant higher index map to injectivity of evaluation maps on (twisted) localization algebras, with only an auxiliary non-load-bearing self-citation to [7].

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the target claim. Theorem 1.2 is proved by first identifying the equivariant higher index with the composition of the localization index isomorphism (Theorem 2.11) and an evaluation map, then showing the evaluation map is injective via twisted equivariant localization algebras. Section 3 uses the coarse embedding of X/Gamma to show (e_pi)_* is injective (Theorem 3.13); Section 4 uses the coarse embedding of Gamma, together with the bounded-distortion hypothesis, to prove the K-theory isomorphism for the twisted algebras (Theorems 4.9 and 4.10); Section 5 applies Bott periodicity (Theorem 5.1) to complete the diagram. The hypotheses X/Gamma and Gamma coarsely embed into Hilbert space and the bounded-distortion condition enter as assumptions used to control supports and ensure the Eilenberg swindle, not as conclusions restated as inputs. No fitted parameter is relabelled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force a choice. The only self-citation is [7] (Fu-Wang), cited for extending certain maps to asymptotic morphisms in the proofs of Theorems 3.13 and 4.10; it is cross-cited with Lemma 7.6 of [39] and does not assert the injectivity being proved, so it is auxiliary rather than load-bearing. There is, however, a genuine non-circular scope issue that should be flagged: the paper defines a fundamental domain by X = disjoint union over gamma of gamma Y, which presupposes a free action, while Definition 2.3 and the proof of Theorem 4.9 explicitly use finite subgroups F_i and spaces Gamma x_{F_i} S_i, so the bounded-distortion hypothesis as stated is undefined for non-free proper actions. This is a well-posedness gap in the main theorem, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the proof is a mathematical derivation. The main assumptions are standard background theorems from coarse geometry and operator K-theory, listed as axioms. The new C*-algebras introduced, such as the equivariant pi-localization algebra and the twisted equivariant Roe algebras, are constructions from existing objects rather than postulated entities with independent empirical evidence, so invented_entities is empty.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Yu's coarse Baum-Connes theorem for spaces coarsely embeddable into Hilbert space (Yu 2000, [39]).
    Used as the template and as input for the non-equivariant index map arguments; the paper extends this machinery rather than reproving it.
  • standard math Proposition 4.3: coarse embeddability of Gamma into Hilbert space is equivalent to the existence of a proper affine action of the transformation groupoid on a continuous field of Hilbert spaces (Tu, [36]; Skandalis-Tu-Yu, [32]).
    Basis for constructing the Gamma-proper C*-algebra A(H,eta), a central ingredient in Section 4.
  • standard math Higson-Kasparov-Trout Bott periodicity for the algebra A(H) of an infinite-dimensional Euclidean space, including its continuous-field version.
    Used in Theorem 5.1 and in the proof of Theorem 1.2 to show that certain K-theory maps are isomorphisms.
  • standard math Equivariant version of the localization algebra index theorem (Theorem 2.11), attributed to Yu [38] and Qiao-Roe [25].
    Reduces injectivity of the equivariant higher index map to injectivity of the evaluation map from localization algebras.
  • standard math Kasparov-Skandalis stabilization: every equivariant K-homology class can be represented by an admissible covariant system.
    Justifies the admissible-system framework used throughout the construction of equivariant Roe algebras.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture and coarse embedding." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B2N5HV53

@misc{pith2026190900529,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture and coarse embedding},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B2N5HV53}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00529}
}
abstract

The equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture provides an algorithm for determining nonvanishing of equivariant higher index of elliptic differential operators on noncompact manifolds. In this article, we prove the equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture under certain coarse embeddability conditions. More precisely, if a discrete group $\Gamma$ acts on a bounded geometric space $X$ properly, isometrically, and with bounded distortion, $X/\Gamma$ and $\Gamma$ admit coarse embeddings into Hilbert space, then the $\Gamma$-equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture holds for $X$. Here bounded distortion means that for any $\gamma\in\Gamma$, $\sup_{x\in Y} d(\gamma x,x)<\infty$, where $Y$ is a fundamental domain of the $\Gamma$-action on $X$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [39]

    Yu, The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a u niform embedding into Hilbert space , Invent

    G. Yu, The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a u niform embedding into Hilbert space , Invent. Math. 139 (2000), no. 1, 201–240. Benyin Fu College of Statistics and Mathematics, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance Shanghai 201209, P. R. China. E-mail: fuby@lixin.edu.cn Xianjin Wang College of Mathematics and Statistics, ...

    work page 2000

  2. [7]

    Fu and X

    B. Fu and X. Wang, The equivariant coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces which admit an equivariant coarse embedding into Hil ert space , J. Funct. Anal. 271 (2016), no. 4, 799-832. 31

    work page 2016

  3. [30]

    Willett and G

    R. Willett and G. Yu, Higher index theory for certain expanders and Gromov monster group, II , Adv. Math. 229 (2012), no. 3, 1762-1803

    work page 2012

  4. [1]

    Baum and A

    P. Baum and A. Connes, K-theory for discrete groups , Operator Algebras and Applications (M. Takesaki(EDs.) D. Evens, ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1989, pp. 1–20

    work page 1989

  5. [2]

    P. Baum, A. Connes and N. Higson, Classifying space for proper actions and K-theory of group C ∗-algebras, Contemp. Math. 167 (1994), 240–291

    work page 1994

  6. [3]

    X. Chen, Q. Wang and G. Yu, The maximal coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a fibred coarse embedding into Hilbert space, Adv. Math. 249 (2013), 88-130

    work page 2013

  7. [4]

    Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press, 1994

    A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press, 1994

    1994

  8. [5]

    Dell’Aiera, Controlled K-theory for groupoids & applications to Coarse Geometry, J

    C. Dell’Aiera, Controlled K-theory for groupoids & applications to Coarse Geometry, J. Funct. Anal. 275 (2018), no. 7, 1756-1807

    work page 2018

Show all 39 references
  1. [6]

    Dixmier, C ∗-algebras, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982

    J. Dixmier, C ∗-algebras, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982

    1982

  2. [8]

    Fukaya and S

    T. Fukaya and S. Oguni, The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for relatively hyperbolic groups, J. Topol. anal. 4 (2012), no. 1, 99-113

    2012

  3. [9]

    Fukaya and S

    T. Fukaya and S. Oguni, Coronae of product spaces and the coarse Baum- Connes conjecture, Adv. Math. 279 (2015), 201-233

    2015

  4. [10]

    Fukaya and S

    T. Fukaya and S. Oguni, The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for Busemann nonpositively curved spaces , Kyoto J. Math. 56 (2016), no. 1, 1-12

    2016

  5. [11]

    G. Gong, Q. Wang and G. Yu, Geometrization of the strong Novikov conjec- ture for residually finite groups , J. Reine Angew. Math. 621 (2008), 159-189

    2008

  6. [12]

    S. Gong, J. Wu and G. Yu, The Novikov conjecture, the group of volume pre- serving diffeomorphisms and Hilbert-Hadamard spaces , arXiv:1811.02086v3

    arXiv

  7. [13]

    Gong and G

    G. Gong and G. Yu, Volume growth and positive scalar curvature , Geom. Funct. Anal. 10 (2000), no. 4, 821-828

    2000

  8. [14]

    Gromov, Asymptotic invariants for infinite groups , Geometric Group Theory, (G

    M. Gromov, Asymptotic invariants for infinite groups , Geometric Group Theory, (G. A. Niblo, M. A. Roller, editors), Cambridge University Pr ess, (1993), 1-295

    1993

  9. [15]

    Guentner, R

    E. Guentner, R. Tessera and G. Yu, Operator norm localization for linear groups and its applications to K-theory, Adv. Math. 226 (2011), no. 4, 3495- 3510

    2011

  10. [16]

    Guentner, R

    E. Guentner, R. Willett and G. Yu, Dynamical complexity and controlled operatorK-theory, arXiv:1609.02093v2

    arXiv

  11. [17]

    Higson, Bivariant K-theory and the Novikov conjecture , Geom

    N. Higson, Bivariant K-theory and the Novikov conjecture , Geom. Funct. Anal. 10 (2000), no. 3, 563–581

    2000

  12. [18]

    Higson and E

    N. Higson and E. Guentner, GroupC ∗-algebras and K-theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1831 (2004), 137-251

    2004

  13. [19]

    Higson, G

    N. Higson, G. Kasparov and J. Trout, A Bott periodicity theorem for infinite dimensional Euclidean space , Adv. Math. 135 (1998), no. 1, 1–40

    1998

  14. [20]

    Higson and J

    N. Higson and J. Roe, On the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture, Novikov conjectures, index theorems and rigidity , Vol. 2, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 227, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995), 22 7-254

    1995

  15. [21]

    Kasparov, Equivariant KK -theory and the Novikov conjecture , Invent

    G. Kasparov, Equivariant KK -theory and the Novikov conjecture , Invent. Math. 91 (1998), no. 1, 147–201. 32

    1998

  16. [22]

    Kasparov and G

    G. Kasparov and G. Skandalis, Group acting properly on “bolic” spaces and the Novikov conjecture , Ann. of Math. 158 (2003), no. 1, 165-206

    2003

  17. [23]

    Kasparov and G

    G. Kasparov and G. Yu, The Novikov conjecture and geometry of Banach spaces, Geom. Topol. 16 (2012), no. 3, 1859-1880

    2012

  18. [24]

    Oyono-Oyono and G

    H. Oyono-Oyono and G. Yu, K-theory for the maximal Roe algebra of certain expanders, J. Funct. Anal. 257 (2009), no. 10, 3239-3292

    2009

  19. [25]

    Qiao and J

    Y. Qiao and J. Roe, On the localization algebra of Guoliang Yu , Forum Math. 22 (2010), no. 4, 657-665

    2010

  20. [26]

    Roe, Coarse cohomology and index theory on complete Riemannian m an- ifolds, vol

    J. Roe, Coarse cohomology and index theory on complete Riemannian m an- ifolds, vol. 104, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 1993

    1993

  21. [27]

    Roe, Index theory, coarse geometry and topology of manifolds , CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, American Mathematica l Society, no

    J. Roe, Index theory, coarse geometry and topology of manifolds , CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, American Mathematica l Society, no. 90, 1996

    1996

  22. [28]

    Rosenberg, C ∗-algebras, positive scalar curvature, and the Novikov con- jecture, Publ

    J. Rosenberg, C ∗-algebras, positive scalar curvature, and the Novikov con- jecture, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. 58 (1983), no. 1, 197-212

    1983

  23. [29]

    Willett and G

    R. Willett and G. Yu, Higher index theory for certain expanders and Gromov monster group, I , Adv. Math. 229 (2012), no. 3, 1380-1416

    2012

  24. [31]

    Willett and G

    R. Willett and G. Yu, Higher Index Theory , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 189, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2020)

    2020

  25. [32]

    Skandalis, J

    G. Skandalis, J. L. Tu and G. Yu, The coarse Baum-Connes conjectrue and groupoids, Topology. 41 (2002), no. 4, 807-834

    2002

  26. [33]

    Shan, An equivariant higher index theory and non-positively curv ed man- ifold, J

    L. Shan, An equivariant higher index theory and non-positively curv ed man- ifold, J. Funct. Anal. 255 (2008), no. 6, 1480–1496

    2008

  27. [34]

    Shan and Q

    L. Shan and Q. Wang, The coarse geometric Novikov conjecture for subspaces of non-positively curved manifolds , J. Funct. Anal. 248 (2007), no. 2, 448– 471

    2007

  28. [35]

    X. Tang, R. Willett and Y. Yao, RoeC ∗-algebra for groupoids and generalized Lichnerowicz vanishing theorem for foliated manifolds , Math. Z. 290 (2018), no. 3-4, 1309-1338. 33

    2018

  29. [36]

    J. L. Tu, La conjecture de Baum-Connes pour les feuilletages moyenna bles, K-Theory 17 (1999), no. 3, 215-264

    1999

  30. [37]

    Yu, Coarse Baum-Connes conjecture,K-theory 9 (1995), no

    G. Yu, Coarse Baum-Connes conjecture,K-theory 9 (1995), no. 3, 199–221

    1995

  31. [38]

    Yu, Localization algebras and the coarse Baum-Connes conjectu re, K- theory 11 (1997), no

    G. Yu, Localization algebras and the coarse Baum-Connes conjectu re, K- theory 11 (1997), no. 4, 307–318

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.