The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2104.09366 · v3 · pith:BDPMU2DJ · submitted 2021-04-19 · math.AG · cs.LO· math.LO

Simple Type Theory is not too Simple: Grothendieck's Schemes without Dependent Types

Reviewed by Pithpith:BDPMU2DJopen to challenge →

classification math.AG cs.LOmath.LO
keywords schemessimpletheorytypedependentgrothendieckmathematicalparticular
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Church's simple type theory is often deemed too simple for elaborate mathematical constructions. In particular, doubts were raised whether schemes could be formalized in this setting and a challenge was issued. Schemes are sophisticated mathematical objects in algebraic geometry introduced by Alexander Grothendieck in 1960. In this article we report on a successful formalization of schemes in the simple type theory of the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL, and we discuss the design choices which make this work possible. We show in the particular case of schemes how the powerful dependent types of Coq or Lean can be traded for a minimalist apparatus called locales.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.