Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 58 references

Recovery of the Solar Cycle from Maunder-like Grand Minima Episodes: A Quantification of the Necessary Polar Flux Threshold through Solar Dynamo Simulations

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a statistically inferred polar flux threshold, about 63 ± 4% of the modal polar flux amplitude in the primary simulation, triggers resumption of polarity reversal and thereby recovery from grand minima.

desk verdict A genuinely new threshold statistic for grand-minimum recovery from a standard dynamo model, but the 63±4% number is built on a single stochastic run — important enough to referee, not yet solid enough to forecast with. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08380 v2 pith:BFY2QDEF submitted 2025-05-13 astro-ph.SR

Chitradeep Saha , Sanghita Chandra , Dibyendu Nandy This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords solarcyclegrandminimaMaunderMinimumpolarfluxfieldreversaldynamoBabcock-Leightonstochasticforcing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what lets the Sun's magnetic cycle restart after decades-long quiet episodes such as the Maunder minimum. Running multi-millennial dynamo simulations with random perturbations in both poloidal field sources, the authors find that recovery from a simulated grand minimum is tied to a narrow range of polar flux amplitudes: in their primary run, polarity reversal resumes when the hemispheric polar flux reaches about $63 \pm 4\%$ of the modal polar flux amplitude. If this threshold transfers to the real Sun, then monitoring the polar field during a deep minimum would offer a way to forecast when normal sunspot cycles are likely to return. The same simulations find no precursor signature that signals entry into a grand minimum, so onset prediction remains out of reach.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is an axisymmetric, kinematic Babcock-Leighton dynamo model with a deep mean-field alpha source and a surface Babcock-Leighton source, each stochastically forced by uniform white noise. The recovery threshold is diagnosed from the signed hemispheric polar flux, computed as the poloidal flux crossing the photosphere between 70° and 87° latitude in each hemisphere. During a simulated grand minimum, surface eruptions are absent and the deep mean-field alpha source converts weak internal toroidal fields into poloidal fields that migrate poleward; polarity reversal resumes once enough flux of one polarity accumulates at the poles. The modal polar flux amplitude, from a skewed Gaussian fit to the distribution of cycle-amplitude values over millennia, supplies the normalizing scale against which the threshold is measured.

What would settle it

Track the Sun's polar field through a future grand minimum, or reconstruct polar-field proxies from cosmogenic isotopes across the Maunder Minimum: if sunspot cycles resume before the hemispheric polar flux reaches about $63\%$ of the modal amplitude in either hemisphere, or fail to resume after both hemispheres pass that value, the threshold claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that there exists a statistically inferred threshold polar flux amplitude whose attainment allows the regular polar flux reversal to kick-start and thereby ends a grand minimum phase. In the primary simulation, recovery flux amplitudes cluster at $63 \pm 4\%$ of the modal value of the skewed Gaussian distribution of signed hemispheric polar flux amplitudes, for both polarities and both hemispheres. The threshold is independent of the critical buoyancy threshold $B_c$, because during a grand minimum the dynamo mostly produces weak toroidal fields below that threshold; it does scale with the quenching limit of the mean-field poloidal source $\alpha^Q_{MF}$, indicating that this source governs recovery. The paper also reports that the duration of a simulated grand minimum shows no significant correlation with either the rate of solar-cycle decline at onset or the rate of recovery, and that no precursor in the polar flux threshold signals the onset of a grand minimum.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the model's noise amplitudes and nonlinear parameters being tuned so that simulated grand-minimum occurrence matches multi-millennial reconstructions; direct polar-field measurements from a real grand minimum do not exist, so the $63\%$ threshold is an emergent property of that tuned model rather than a calibrated solar observable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If a real grand minimum follows this threshold law, regular measurement of the Sun's polar flux during the minimum would let forecasters estimate when polarity reversal and normal sunspot cycles should resume.
  • The independence of the recovery threshold from the critical buoyancy threshold means uncertainty about deep-seated toroidal field emergence does not directly affect the predicted recovery condition.
  • Because the mean-field poloidal source sets both the modal polar flux and the recovery threshold, stronger quenching of this source implies a higher recovery threshold and hence a harder, slower recovery from a grand minimum.
  • The absence of a correlation between grand-minimum duration and onset or recovery rates implies that historical cycle-decline rates cannot be used to predict how long a minimum will last.
  • The failure to find any precursor in the simulated polar flux before entry into a grand minimum suggests that predicting the onset of such episodes remains an open problem.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $63 \pm 4\%$ ratio is a generic property of stochastically forced threshold-reset dynamo systems, the same relative threshold may appear in other Babcock-Leighton models, which could be checked without waiting for a real grand minimum.
  • A testable extension is to compare the threshold against solar-stellar analogues: stars showing minima episodes with polar-field proxies could reveal whether recovery indeed follows a fixed fraction of modal polar flux rather than an absolute value.
  • The lack of onset precursors, if robust, would imply that grand-minimum onset is set by rare noise realizations near a critical dynamo state, so predictability of onset is intrinsically limited; this is a consequence the authors hint at but do not fully develop.
  • Applying a similar threshold analysis to the timing of polarity-reversal resumption in hemispheric asymmetries could help refine forecasts of which hemisphere leads the recovery from an asymmetric grand minimum.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses an axisymmetric kinematic solar dynamo model with stochastic fluctuations in the mean-field and Babcock-Leighton poloidal sources, tuned to reproduce multi-millennial grand-minimum occurrence statistics. It defines 'unipolar phases' during deep minima in which polar-field reversal halts, tracks the signed hemispheric polar flux in 70–87 degrees latitude, and reports that polar flux amplitudes at the end of these unipolar phases cluster near 63 ± 4% of the modal polar flux amplitude for the primary simulation. The authors further explore how the modal and recovery-threshold fluxes depend on the critical buoyancy threshold Bc and the mean-field quenching limit alpha_Q^MF, and they report no statistically significant correlation between grand-minimum duration and the rates of onset or recovery. They propose that regular polar-flux monitoring during a minimum could forecast recovery and emphasize that no reliable precursors for grand-minimum onset were found.

Significance. The potential contribution is a quantitative, physically motivated recovery statistic for solar grand minima, connecting the stochastic mean-field alpha source to the resumption of polarity reversal. The parameter-space exploration separating the Bc and alpha_Q^MF dependencies is useful, and the manuscript is commendably explicit about its null results and limitations. However, the central threshold claim is currently supported by a single stochastic realization and by clustering of exit amplitudes rather than by a conditional recovery-probability analysis, so the result is not yet established as a robust, forecastable quantity.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1 and Abstract] The paper labels the measured quantity a 'necessary' polar flux threshold, but the analysis only documents that recovery events cluster at roughly 63 ± 4% of the modal polar flux. Section 3.1 itself notes that weak polar flux cycles weaker than the recovery threshold occur during regular activity, so the threshold is not a barrier whose crossing is required for reversal. The forecast claim needs a conditional analysis: estimate the probability of recovery or reversal as a function of instantaneous polar flux during unipolar phases, and compare the exit-amplitude distribution to the distribution of polar flux values sampled throughout those phases. Without this, the clustering is a mean exit amplitude rather than a threshold.
  2. [Sec. 2, Sec. 3.1, Table 2] The 63 ± 4% value is obtained from a single 10,000-year stochastic run with fixed noise amplitudes (100% on alpha_MF and 150% on alpha_BL), and the additional runs vary Bc and alpha_Q^MF but not the noise amplitude or the random seed. Since alpha_MF is the dominant poloidal source during minima, the recovery statistics are controlled by exactly the stochastic forcing that is held fixed. An ensemble over noise realizations, at minimum different seeds for the primary parameter set, is needed to attach uncertainty to the threshold, and a small sweep of the alpha_MF noise amplitude is needed to test whether the normalized ratio is invariant. The text should also define how the threshold value and the reported ± range are estimated from the green diamond points in Fig. 3.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Figs. 4 and 5] The linear-correlation statements are based on one realization per parameter combination, with no error bars on the modal or threshold flux estimates. In particular, the claim that the recovery threshold is independent of Bc (right panel of Fig. 4) rests on differences between threshold values that may be comparable to the sampling uncertainty from only 22 grand-minimum events in the primary run. Reporting confidence intervals or a small ensemble of realizations per parameter set is necessary to support the p-values and the independence claim.
  4. [Sec. 4 and Concluding Remarks] The proposed forecast recipe requires an absolute or normalized polar flux scale, but no direct observational calibration exists for the polar field inside a real grand minimum, and the modal value used for normalization is itself model-dependent, as shown by its variation with Bc and alpha_Q^MF in Figs. 4 and 5. The authors should state explicitly how the modal polar flux would be determined in an actual forecast and what systematic uncertainty the model dependence contributes; otherwise the transfer of the 63 ± 4% value to the Sun is not established.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (3)] Equation (3) is written as alpha0^MF ~ alpha0^MF / (1 + (B/alpha_Q^MF)^2), which is self-referential and cannot be read as the quenching law; the left side should be the actual mean-field alpha coefficient or a differently named amplitude.
  2. [Abstract] In the abstract, 'thought to resume, Using' should be 'thought to resume. Using'.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The Fig. 3 caption says the distribution spans ten millennia, while Fig. 2 illustrates one millennium; specify whether the same long run is used for both and how many unipolar-phase events contribute to the threshold estimate.
  4. [Table 1] Table 1 uses 'BC' in the header while the text uses 'Bc'; please use a single consistent notation.
  5. [Sec. 3.2] In Sec. 3.2, 'recovery if the polar flux threshold' contains a typo and should be 'recovery of the polar flux threshold' or similar.
  6. [Data availability] The data availability statement promises data on reasonable request but does not mention code; for a simulation-based forecast claim, depositing the model code and run scripts would substantially improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the recovery polar-flux threshold is an emergent statistic measured from the simulations, not a fitted input or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the recovery polar-flux threshold, quantified as 63±4% of the modal polar flux amplitude. This value is obtained by locating the terminations of unipolar phases in long stochastically forced dynamo runs and averaging the signed polar flux amplitudes at those terminations. The threshold is not inserted into the model as an input; rather, reversals resume in the model when sufficient polar flux has built up, and the threshold is read off from the resulting time series. It is therefore an emergent statistic, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The modal polar flux used for normalization is dominated by regular cycles, not by grand minima, so the 63% ratio is not tautological. The noise amplitudes are calibrated to reproduce observed grand-minimum occurrence statistics from Usoskin et al., which is an external benchmark and not the recovery-threshold target; the threshold itself is not used to fit those amplitudes. The model profiles and nonlinear quenching prescriptions are adopted from earlier published work, including some coauthored by Nandy, but these are concrete model ingredients and independent published simulations, not unverified uniqueness theorems invoked to forbid alternatives. The dependence of the recovery threshold on the mean-field alpha quenching parameter is tested directly by varying αQ_MF, and the claimed independence from Bc is tested by a parameter sweep. A robustness caveat remains — the threshold is derived from single noise-tuned realizations per parameter set and lacks direct observational calibration of polar flux during real minima — but this is a scientific limitation, not circular reasoning. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result is an emergent statistic of a tuned, kinematic, stochastic dynamo model. The noise amplitudes and quenching parameters are free inputs chosen to match grand-minima occurrence rates; the threshold inherits their uncertainty. No new physical entities are posited, but the recovery threshold is a model-defined quantity without independent observational evidence.

free parameters (4)
  • Stochastic noise amplitude on mean-field alpha = 100%
    Chosen to reproduce observed grand-minima occurrence statistics (Sec. 2); not derived from measurement.
  • Stochastic noise amplitude on Babcock-Leighton alpha = 150%
    Chosen to reproduce observed grand-minima occurrence statistics (Sec. 2); not derived from measurement.
  • Mean-field quenching limit alpha_Q_MF = 10 kG (primary), 8 and 12 kG in sensitivity runs
    Primary value selected ad hoc; sensitivity runs show the recovery threshold increases with this parameter (Fig. 5).
  • Critical buoyancy threshold Bc = 80 kG (primary), 75 and 85 kG in sensitivity runs
    Primary value selected following earlier buoyancy studies; recovery threshold shown independent of it (Fig. 4).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The axisymmetric kinematic mean-field dynamo approximation (Eqs. 1-2) adequately captures the large-scale solar cycle and its grand minima.
    Standard in the field; cited from Chatterjee et al. 2004 and used without testing against a dynamical model.
  • domain assumption The solar dynamo currently operates in a near-critical regime.
    Invoked in Sec. 2 with citations to Metcalfe et al. 2016 and others; justifies the choice of dynamo numbers.
  • domain assumption Stochastic fluctuations in the poloidal sources are uniform white noise, added independently in each hemisphere.
    Stated in Sec. 2 as an Occam's-razor choice; the paper notes colored noise is possible (Saha et al. 2025) but does not test it here.
  • domain assumption The mean-field alpha source alpha_MF dominates poloidal field generation during grand minima because no active regions exist to feed the Babcock-Leighton source.
    Argued in Sec. 3.2; key for the interpretation of the recovery threshold.
  • standard math The skew-normal distribution adequately represents the simulated polar flux amplitude histogram; the modal value is a stable reference.
    Used in Sec. 3.1 and Fig. 3 to define the threshold scale; fit quality not quantified.
invented entities (1)
  • Recovery polar flux threshold
    purpose: The polar flux amplitude at which unipolar phases terminate and regular cycles resume; used as a recovery predictor.
    Defined internally from simulated grand minima; no direct observational measurement of polar fields during an actual grand minimum exists to test it, and the absolute polar flux scale is not calibrated to observations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recovery of the Solar Cycle from Maunder-like Grand Minima Episodes: A Quantification of the Necessary Polar Flux Threshold through Solar Dynamo Simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BFY2QDEF

@misc{pith2026250508380,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recovery of the Solar Cycle from Maunder-like Grand Minima Episodes: A Quantification of the Necessary Polar Flux Threshold through Solar Dynamo Simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BFY2QDEF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08380}
}
read the original abstract

The 11-yr cycle of sunspots undergo amplitude modulation over longer timescales. As a part of this long-term modulation in solar activity, the decennial rhythm occasionally breaks, with quiescent phases with very few sunspots observed over multiple decades. These episodes are termed as solar grand minima. Observation of solar magnetic activity proxies complemented by solar dynamo simulations suggests that the large-scale solar polar fields become very weak during these minima phases with a temporary halt in the polar field reversal. Eventually, with the accumulation of sufficient polar fluxes, the polarity reversal and regular cyclic activity is thought to resume, Using multi-millennial dynamo simulations with stochastic forcing, we quantify the polar flux threshold necessary to recover global solar polarity reversal and surmount grand minima phases. We find that the duration of a grand minimum is independent of the onset rate and does not affect the recovery rate. Our results suggest a method to forecast the Sun's recovery from a grand minima phase. However, based on our approach, we could not identify specific precursors that signal entry in to a grand minima phase -- implying that predicting the onset of grand minima remains an outstanding challenge.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08380 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A visualization of the nonlinear algebraic quenching profile used for the mean-field poloidal source, αMF , in our simulations with three different choices of magnetic field magni￾tudes, i.e., α Q MF = 8, 10, and 12 kG. Bc denotes the critical buoyancy threshold imposed on the deep-seated toroidal fields beyond which surface eruption events are possible in the dynamo model. Bc assumes following three values, 75, 80 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An overview of the temporal dynamics of simulated solar polar fields over a millen￾nium. The top and bottom panels show the evolution of northern and southern hemispheric polar fields, with grand minima-like intermittent phases. Episodes with no polarity reversal are shaded in grey. Red and blue markers track the cycle amplitudes for positive and negative polarities, respectively. The middle panel depicts the surfac… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of simulated polar flux amplitudes (blue: positive; red: negative) over ten millennia, for northern (top panel) and southern (bottom panel) solar hemispheres. Corre￾sponding histograms depict the distribution of polar flux amplitudes over the global timescale. The polar fields remain predominantly in the regular activity phase, therefore the histograms are fitted with Gaussian curves with non-zero skewn… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Modal values of hemispheric polar flux are linearly correlated to the critical buoy￾ancy threshold, Bc (left panel; mN for north, in blue and mS for south, in red). Whereas, the recovery threshold polar flux is independent of Bc (right panel; threshold for northern hem…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evidence of statistically significant correlation between the (a) modal values of hemispheric polar flux (left panel; mN for north, in blue and mS for south, in red), (b) recovery threshold values of hemispheric polar flux (middle panel; thN for north, in blue and thS …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Linear correlation analyses between the duration of a given simulated grand mini￾mum episode with the corresponding rate of onset (left panel) and the rate of recovery (right panel), respectively. The correlation coefficient and the parameter of statistical significanc…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A visual summary of signed hemispheric polar flux distribution for different com￾binations of critical buoyancy threshold, Bc, and mean-field magnetic quenching, α Q MF . Blue and red dashed lines mark the positive and negative modal values of the corresponding skewed …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , Tobias , S

    barticle Beer , J. , Tobias , S. , Weiss , N. : 1998 , An Active Sun Throughout the Maunder Minimum . Solar Physics 181 , 237 . https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005026001784 . https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005026001784 . barticle

    doi:10.1023/a:1005026001784 1998

  2. [2]

    , Nandy , D

    barticle Bhowmik , P. , Nandy , D. : 2018 , Prediction of the strength and timing of sunspot cycle 25 reveal decadal-scale space environmental conditions . Nat. Commun. 9 , 5209 . barticle

    2018

  3. [3]

    , Makarov , V.I

    barticle Callebaut , D.K. , Makarov , V.I. , Tlatov , A.G. : 2007 , Monopolar structure of the Sun in between polar reversals and in Maunder Minimum . Adv. Space Res. 40 , 1917 . barticle

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    , Schüssler , M

    barticle Cameron , R. , Schüssler , M. : 2015 , The crucial role of surface magnetic fields for the solar dynamo . Science 347 , 1333 . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261470 . https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1261470 . barticle

    doi:10.1126/science.1261470 2015

  5. [5]

    , Schüssler , M

    barticle Cameron , R.H. , Schüssler , M. : 2017 , Understanding Solar Cycle Variability . The Astrophysical Journal 843 , 111 . https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa767a . https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa767a . barticle

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa767a 2017

  6. [6]

    , Schüssler , M

    barticle Cameron , R.H. , Schüssler , M. : 2019 , Solar activity: periodicities beyond 11 years are consistent with random forcing . Astronomy and astrophysics 625 , A28 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935290 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935290 . barticle

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935290 2019

  7. [7]

    , Hayakawa , H

    barticle Carrasco , V.M.S. , Hayakawa , H. , Kuroyanagi , C. , Gallego , M.C. , Vaquero , J.M. : 2021 , Strong evidence of low levels of solar activity during the Maunder Minimum . Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 504 , 5199 . barticle

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    , Blais-Laurier , G

    barticle Charbonneau , P. , Blais-Laurier , G. , St-Jean , C. : 2004 , Intermittency and phase persistence in a Babcock-Leighton model of the solar cycle . Astrophys. J. 616 , L183 . barticle

    work page 2004

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    , Nandy , D

    barticle Chatterjee , P. , Nandy , D. , Choudhuri , A.R. : 2004 , Full-sphere simulations of a circulation-dominated solar dynamo: Exploring the parity issue . Astronomy & Astrophysics 427 , 1019 . barticle

    2004

  2. [10]

    : 1992 , Stochastic fluctuations of the solar dynamo

    barticle Choudhuri , A. : 1992 , Stochastic fluctuations of the solar dynamo . Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 253, no. 1, Jan. 1992, p. 277-285. Research supported by ISRO. 253 , 277 . barticle

    1992

  3. [11]

    , Chang , L.C

    barticle Daglis , I.A. , Chang , L.C. , Dasso , S. , Gopalswamy , N. , Khabarova , O.V. , Kilpua , E. , Lopez , R. , Marsh , D. , Matthes , K. , Nandy , D. , Sepp\"al\"a , A. , Shiokawa , K. , Thi\'eblemont , R. , Zong , Q. : 2021 , Predictability of variable solar--terrestria...

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    , Nandy , D

    barticle Dash , S. , Nandy , D. , Usoskin , I. : 2023 , Long-term forcing of the Sun's coronal field, open flux, and cosmic ray modulation potential during grand minima, maxima, and regular activity phases by the solar dynamo mechanism . Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 525 , 4801 . barticle

    2023

  5. [13]

    , Solanki, S

    barticle Dasi-Espuig, M. , Solanki, S. K. , Krivova, N. A. , Cameron, R. , Pe\ nuela, T. : 2010 , Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle . Astronomy and Astrophysics 518 , A7 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014301 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-63...

    2010 doi

  6. [14]

    : 1976 , The Maunder Minimum

    barticle Eddy , J.A. : 1976 , The Maunder Minimum . Science 192 , 1189 . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.192.4245.1189 . https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.192.4245.1189 . barticle

    1976

  7. [15]

    : 2021 , Magnetic fields in the solar convection zone

    barticle Fan , Y. : 2021 , Magnetic fields in the solar convection zone . Living Reviews in Solar Physics 18 , 5 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-021-00031-2 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-021-00031-2 . barticle

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    : 2015 , The Solar Cycle

    barticle Hathaway , D.H. : 2015 , The Solar Cycle . Living Reviews in Solar Physics 12 , 4 . https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4 . https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4 . barticle

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    , Lockwood , M

    barticle Hayakawa , H. , Lockwood , M. , Owens , M.J. , S \^o ma , M. , Besser , B.P. , van Driel-Gesztelyi , L. : 2021 , Graphical evidence for the solar coronal structure during the Maunder minimum: comparative study of the total eclipse drawings in 1706 and 1715 . J. Space ...

    2021

  10. [18]

    , Nandy , D

    barticle Hazra , S. , Nandy , D. : 2019 , The origin of parity changes in the solar cycle . Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489 , 4329 . barticle

    2019

  11. [19]

    , Passos , D

    barticle Hazra , S. , Passos , D. , Nandy , D. : 2014 , A stochastically forced time delay solar dynamo model: self-consistent recovery from a Maunder-like grand minimum necessitates a mean-field alpha effect . The Astrophysical Journal 789 , 5 . barticle

    2014

  12. [20]

    : 2024 , Exploring solar dynamo behavior using an annually resolved carbon-14 compilation during multiple grand solar minima

    barticle Inceoglu , F. : 2024 , Exploring solar dynamo behavior using an annually resolved carbon-14 compilation during multiple grand solar minima . Sci. Rep. 14 , 5617 . barticle

    2024

  13. [21]

    , Saha , C

    barticle Jaswal , P. , Saha , C. , Nandy , D. : 2023 , Discovery of a relation between the decay rate of the Sun’s magnetic dipole and the growth rate of the following sunspot cycle: a new precursor for solar cycle prediction . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society...

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    , Cameron , R.H

    barticle Jiang , J. , Cameron , R.H. , Schüssler , M. : 2014 , EFFECTS OF THE SCATTER IN SUNSPOT GROUP TILT ANGLES ON THE LARGE-SCALE MAGNETIC FIELD AT THE SOLAR SURFACE . The Astrophysical Journal 791 , 5 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/5 . https://dx.doi.org/10.108...

    2014 doi

  15. [23]

    , Cameron , R.H

    barticle Jiang , J. , Cameron , R.H. , Schüssler , M. : 2015 , THE CAUSE OF THE WEAK SOLAR CYCLE 24 . The Astrophysical Journal Letters 808 , L28 . https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L28 . https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L28 . barticle

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    , Miesch , M

    barticle Karak , B.B. , Miesch , M. : 2017 , Solar Cycle Variability Induced by Tilt Angle Scatter in a Babcock–Leighton Solar Dynamo Model . The Astrophysical Journal 847 , 69 . https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa8636 . https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa8636 . barticle

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    , Miesch , M

    barticle Karak , B.B. , Miesch , M. : 2018 , Recovery from Maunder-like Grand Minima in a Babcock–Leighton Solar Dynamo Model . The Astrophysical Journal Letters 860 , L26 . https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaca97 . https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaca97 . barticle

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    , Karak , B.B

    barticle Kumar , P. , Karak , B.B. , Sreedevi , A. : 2024 , Variabilities in the polar field and solar cycle due to irregular properties of bipolar magnetic regions . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 530 , 2895 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1052 . https:...

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    : 2003 , Magnetic Flux Transport Simulations of Solar Surface Magnetic Distributions During a Grand Minimum

    barticle Mackay , D.H. : 2003 , Magnetic Flux Transport Simulations of Solar Surface Magnetic Distributions During a Grand Minimum . Sol. Phys. 213 , 173 . barticle

    2003

  20. [28]

    , Tlatov , A.G

    barticle Makarov , V.I. , Tlatov , A.G. : 2000 , Polar magnetic field reversals of the Sun in Maunder Minimum . J. Astrophys. Astron. 21 , 193 . barticle

    2000

  21. [29]

    , Egeland , R

    barticle Metcalfe , T.S. , Egeland , R. , van Saders , J. : 2016 , STELLAR EVIDENCE THAT THE SOLAR DYNAMO MAY BE IN TRANSITION . The Astrophysical Journal Letters 826 , L2 . https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/826/1/L2 . https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/826/1/L2 . barticle

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    , G\'omez , D.O

    barticle Mininni , P.D. , G\'omez , D.O. , Mindlin , G.B. : 2002 , Biorthogonal Decomposition Techniques Unveil the Nature of the Irregularities Observed in the Solar Cycle . Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 , 061101 . https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.061101 . https://link.aps.org/do...

    2002 doi

  23. [31]

    , Sokoloff , D

    barticle Moss , D. , Sokoloff , D. , Usoskin , I. , Tutubalin , V. : 2008 , Solar grand minima and random fluctuations in dynamo parameters . Sol. Phys. 250 , 221 . barticle

    2008

  24. [32]

    , Vaquero , J.M

    barticle Mu \ n oz-Jaramillo , A. , Vaquero , J.M. : 2018 , Visualization of the challenges and limitations of the long-term sunspot number record . Nat. Astron. 3 , 205 . barticle

    2018

  25. [33]

    , Lemerle , A

    barticle Nagy , M. , Lemerle , A. , Labonville , F. , Petrovay , K. , Charbonneau , P. : 2017 , The Effect of ``Rogue'' Active Regions on the Solar Cycle . Solar Physics 292 , 167 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1194-0 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1194-0 . barticle

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    : 2002 , Constraints on the Solar Internal Magnetic Field from a Buoyancy Driven Solar Dynamo

    barticle Nandy , D. : 2002 , Constraints on the Solar Internal Magnetic Field from a Buoyancy Driven Solar Dynamo . Astrophysics and Space Science 282 , 209 . https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021632522168 . https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021632522168 . barticle

    2002 doi

  27. [35]

    , Choudhuri , A.R

    barticle Nandy , D. , Choudhuri , A.R. : 2001 , Toward a mean field formulation of the Babcock‐Leighton type solar dynamo. I. ‐coefficient versus durney's double‐ring approach . Astrophys. J. 551 , 576 . barticle

    2001

  28. [36]

    , Choudhuri , A.R

    barticle Nandy , D. , Choudhuri , A.R. : 2002 , Explaining the latitudinal distribution of sunspots with deep meridional flow . Science 296 , 1671 . barticle

    2002

  29. [37]

    , Martens , P.C.H

    barticle Nandy , D. , Martens , P.C.H. , Obridko , V. , Dash , S. , Georgieva , K. : 2021 , Solar evolution and extrema: current state of understanding of long-term solar variability and its planetary impacts . Progress in Earth and Planetary Science 8 , 40 . https://doi.org/1...

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    , Baruah , Y

    barticle Nandy , D. , Baruah , Y. , Bhowmik , P. , Dash , S. , Gupta , S. , Hazra , S. , Lekshmi , B. , Pal , S. , Pal , S. , Roy , S. , Saha , C. , Sinha , S. : 2023 , Causality in heliophysics: Magnetic fields as a bridge between the Sun's interior and the Earth's space envi...

    2023

  31. [39]

    , Banerjee , D

    bchapter Nandy , D. , Banerjee , D. , Bhowmik , P. , BRUN , A.S. , Cameron , R.H. , Gibson , S.E. , Hanasoge , S. , Harra , L. , Hassler , D.M. , Jain , R. , Jiang , J. , Jouve , L. , Mackay , D.H. , Mahajan , S.S. , Mandrini , C.H. , Owens , M. , Pal , S. , Pinto , R.F. , Sah...

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    , Kitchatinov , L.L

    barticle Olemskoy , S.V. , Kitchatinov , L.L. : 2013 , Grand minima and north-south asymmetry of solar activity . Astrophys. J. 777 , 71 . barticle

    2013

  33. [41]

    , Nandy , D

    barticle Pal , S. , Nandy , D. : 2024 , Algebraic quantification of the contribution of active regions to the Sun’s dipole moment: applications to century-scale polar field estimates and solar cycle forecasting . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 531 , 1546 . h...

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    , Bhowmik , P

    barticle Pal , S. , Bhowmik , P. , Mahajan , S.S. , Nandy , D. : 2023 , Impact of Anomalous Active Regions on the Large-scale Magnetic Field of the Sun . The Astrophysical Journal 953 , 51 . https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acd77e . https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acd77e...

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    , Nandy , D

    barticle Passos , D. , Nandy , D. , Hazra , S. , Lopes , I. : 2014 , A solar dynamo model driven by mean-field alpha and Babcock-Leighton sources: fluctuations, grand-minima-maxima, and hemispheric asymmetry in sunspot cycles . Astronomy & Astrophysics 563 , A18 . barticle

    2014

  36. [44]

    , Nandy , D

    botherref Pevtsov , A.A. , Nandy , D. , Usoskin , I. , Pevtsov , A.A. , Corti , C. , Lef \`e vre , L. , Owens , M. , Li , G. , Krivova , N. , Saha , C. , Perri , B. , Brun , A.S. , Strugarek , A. , Dayeh , M.A. , Nagovitsyn , Y.A. , Erd \'e lyi , R. : 2023, Long-term solar var...

    2023

  37. [45]

    , Shapiro , A.I

    barticle Reinhold , T. , Shapiro , A.I. , Solanki , S.K. , Montet , B.T. , Krivova , N.A. , Cameron , R.H. , Amazo-Gómez , E.M. : 2020 , The Sun is less active than other solar-like stars . Science 368 , 518 . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3821 . https://www.science.org/d...

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    , Nandy , D

    barticle Saha , C. , Nandy , D. : 2023 , Understanding Grand Minima in Solar Activity: Confronting Observations with Dynamo Simulations . Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 19 , 128–140 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921324000905 . barticle

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    , Chandra , S

    barticle Saha , C. , Chandra , S. , Nandy , D. : 2022 , Evidence of persistence of weak magnetic cycles driven by meridional plasma flows during solar grand minima phases . 517 , L36 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slac104 . 2022MNRAS.517L..36S . barticle

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    , Mukhopadhyay , S

    barticle Saha , C. , Mukhopadhyay , S. , Nandy , D. : 2025 , On the Origin of Long-term Modulation in the Sun’s Magnetic Activity Cycle . The Astrophysical Journal Letters 984 , L5 . https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adc91e . https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adc91e . barticle

    2025 doi

  41. [49]

    , Kauristie , K

    botherref Schrijver , C.J. , Kauristie , K. , Aylward , A.D. , Denardini , C.M. , Gibson , S.E. , Glover , A. , Gopalswamy , N. , Grande , M. , Hapgood , M. , Heynderickx , D. , Jakowski , N. , Kalegaev , V.V. , Lapenta , G. , Linker , J.A. , Liu , S. , Mandrini , C.H. , Mann ...

    2015

  42. [50]

    , Schmidt , G.A

    barticle Shindell , D.T. , Schmidt , G.A. , Mann , M.E. , Rind , D. , Waple , A. : 2001 , Solar Forcing of Regional Climate Change During the Maunder Minimum . Science 294 , 2149 . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064363 . https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.106436...

    2001 doi

  43. [51]

    , Nandy , D

    barticle Tripathi , B. , Nandy , D. , Banerjee , S. : 2021 , Stellar mid-life crisis: subcritical magnetic dynamos of solar-like stars and the breakdown of gyrochronology . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 506 , L50 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/sl...

    2021 doi

  44. [52]

    : 2023 , A history of solar activity over millennia

    barticle Usoskin , I.G. : 2023 , A history of solar activity over millennia . Living Reviews in Solar Physics 20 , 2 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-023-00036-z . https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-023-00036-z . barticle

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    , Sokoloff , D

    barticle Usoskin , I.G. , Sokoloff , D. , Moss , D. : 2009 , Grand minima of solar activity and the mean-field dynamo . Sol. Phys. 254 , 345 . barticle

    2009

  46. [54]

    , Solanki , S.K

    barticle Usoskin , I.G. , Solanki , S.K. , Kovaltsov , G.A. : 2007 , Grand minima and maxima of solar activity: new observational constraints . Astron. Astrophys. 471 , 301 . barticle

    2007

  47. [55]

    , Arlt , R

    barticle Usoskin , I.G. , Arlt , R. , Asvestari , E. , Hawkins , E. , K \"a pyl \"a , M. , Kovaltsov , G.A. , Krivova , N. , Lockwood , M. , Mursula , K. , O'Reilly , J. , Owens , M. , Scott , C.J. , Sokoloff , D.D. , Solanki , S.K. , Soon , W. , Vaquero , J.M. : 2015 , The Ma...

    2015

  48. [56]

    , Ceillier , T

    botherref van Saders , J.L. , Ceillier , T. , Metcalfe , T.S. , Aguirre , V.S. , Pinsonneault , M.H. , Garc \'i a , R.A. , Mathur , S. , Davies , G.R. : 2016, Weakened magnetic braking as the origin of anomalously rapid rotation in old field stars. Nature. botherref

    2016

  49. [57]

    , Kumar , P

    barticle Wavhal , S. , Kumar , P. , Karak , B.B. : 2025 , Analyses of Features of Magnetic Cycles at Different Amounts of Dynamo Supercriticality: Solar Dynamo Is About Two Times Critical . Solar Physics 300 , 21 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-025-02428-w . https://doi.org/1...

    2025 doi

  50. [58]

    , Fan , Y

    barticle Weber , M.A. , Fan , Y. , Miesch , M.S. : 2011 , THE RISE OF ACTIVE REGION FLUX TUBES IN THE TURBULENT SOLAR CONVECTIVE ENVELOPE . The Astrophysical Journal 741 , 11 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/11 . https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/11 . barticle

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.