The Strong 3SUM-INDEXING Conjecture is False
pith:BGCO5D74 Add to your LaTeX paper
What is a Pith Number?\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{BGCO5D74}
Prints a linked pith:BGCO5D74 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more
read the original abstract
In the 3SUM-Indexing problem the goal is to preprocess two lists of elements from $U$, $A=(a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n)$ and $B=(b_1,b_2,...,b_n)$, such that given an element $c\in U$ one can quickly determine whether there exists a pair $(a,b)\in A \times B$ where $a+b=c$. Goldstein et al.~[WADS'2017] conjectured that there is no algorithm for 3SUM-Indexing which uses $n^{2-\Omega(1)}$ space and $n^{1-\Omega(1)}$ query time. We show that the conjecture is false by reducing the 3SUM-Indexing problem to the problem of inverting functions, and then applying an algorithm of Fiat and Naor [SICOMP'1999] for inverting functions.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Improved Time-Space Tradeoffs for 3SUM-Indexing
Achieves T S = n^{2.5} time-space tradeoff for 3SUM-Indexing via structured decomposition of the function inverted by Fiat-Naor.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.