Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Ultrabroadband Milliwatt-Level Resonant Frequency Doubling on a Chip

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Placing the pump and second-harmonic resonances in two linearly uncoupled microrings turns resonant frequency doubling into an ultrabroadband, reconfigurable process, with milliwatt output across the telecom band and upconverted Kerr…

desk verdict A solid experimental advance in broadband on-chip SHG; the record numbers need unpacking and the 'uncoupled' premise is locally rather than globally true, but the core device works. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03322 v2 pith:BGN2DQKY submitted 2024-12-04 physics.optics

Marco Clementi , Luca Zatti , Ji Zhou , Marco Liscidini , Camille-Sophie Brès This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords second-harmonicgenerationmicroringresonatorssiliconnitridephotonicsall-opticalpolingquasi-phase-matchingfrequencycombupconversionlinearlyuncoupledtelecom-bandnonlinearoptics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that resonant frequency doubling does not have to be narrowband. The authors place the pump field and the second-harmonic field in two separate, linearly uncoupled racetrack resonators that share only a short interaction arm, so the resonance condition for each color can be set independently. A quasi-phase-matching grating written optically into the shared arm then allows frequency doubling over a bandwidth exceeding 200 nm. The device is reported to produce milliwatt-level second-harmonic output across the telecom C and L bands, and to upconvert an internally generated Kerr comb spanning about 100 nm with up to 10 mW per line. If correct, this removes the previous trade-off between conversion efficiency and spectral coverage for resonant frequency doubling.

What carries the argument

The central object is a pair of racetrack resonators joined by a Mach–Zehnder interferometer whose directional couplers are designed to split 100:0 in the pump band and 0:100 in the harmonic band, so the two rings share a physical path without sharing resonant modes. The mechanism that carries the argument is the all-optically poled quasi-phase-matching grating written in the shared arm, with period $\Lambda\approx 4.35\,\mu$m satisfying $\Delta k=k_{\mathrm{SH}}-2k_{\mathrm{FH}}-2\pi/\Lambda=0$. Its bandwidth is set by the short grating length rather than by resonator dispersion, and the independent heaters on each ring plus the heater on the interferometer let the experimenter restore the doubly resonant condition and suppress residual linear coupling. This separation of functions is what allows many resonance pairs to participate in frequency doubling at once and what lets a Kerr comb be upconverted line by line.

What would settle it

Measure a single resonance pair while monitoring the bus waveguide on the north ring: if the rings are not effectively uncoupled, the pump resonance will split, broaden, or show an anticrossing at the point where the SH resonance crosses the pump, and the second-harmonic output will deviate from the product of the two independent Lorentzian field enhancements. A direct pass/fail experiment would be to set the MZI heater to the worst-case coupling, scan the north heater across the SH resonance, and check whether the SHG map loses its two independent branches.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the three constraints that forced narrowband operation — phase matching, the doubly resonant condition, and free-spectral-range matching — can be treated separately by assigning pump and second harmonic to different resonators. The south ring is resonant at the pump, the north ring at the harmonic, and the only nonlinear contact between them is a Mach–Zehnder interaction arm in which both fields circulate together and all-optical poling writes a $\chi^{(2)}$ grating. Because the rings are linearly uncoupled, the two resonance families can be shifted independently with on-chip heaters, and the loop lengths can be chosen so that $v_g^{\mathrm{FH}}/L^{\mathrm{FH}}=v_g^{\mathrm{SH}}/L^{\mathrm{SH}}$, yielding matched free spectral ranges without dispersion engineering. The paper reports addressable second-harmonic generation at milliwatt power from 1530 to 1620 nm, and then configures the same device to generate an incoherent modulation-instability comb and frequency-double it to an upconverted comb spanning nearly 50 nm in the harmonic band (about 100 nm in the pump band), with up to 10 mW per line.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two rings remain effectively linearly uncoupled across the operating band after tuning the Mach–Zehnder heater; the paper's own data show residual coupling as visibility loss, linewidth broadening, and an anticrossing perturbation, so if that coupling cannot be controlled, independent addressing of pump and harmonic resonances fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The singly resonant microring trade-off between conversion efficiency and bandwidth is replaced by a design in which the two are set by separate degrees of freedom.
  • A chip-scale source can deliver milliwatt-level second-harmonic light at any addressable telecom resonance, with conversion efficiency up to 40%/W in continuous wave operation.
  • Frequency combs generated in the pump ring can be upconverted on the same chip, giving per-line powers above 10 mW over roughly 100 nm of pump bandwidth.
  • The electrically reconfigurable doubly resonant condition means fabrication tolerances no longer decide which resonance pair can be used, and a synchronized pump-and-heater scan could in principle give gap-free tuning of the harmonic wavelength.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the linearly uncoupled design could be modularized, with a pump cavity and harmonic cavity optimized separately on different materials and connected by a nonlinear waveguide, which would extend this architecture to wavelength bands where a single CMOS-compatible material lacks the needed resonances.
  • Inference: the observed pump-depletion trade-off between comb formation and upconversion suggests that assigning different lengths of the shared arm to $\chi^{(2)}$ and $\chi^{(3)}$ processes, or tuning their relative strengths, could allow broadband comb generation and efficient upconversion simultaneously rather than as a compromise.
  • Inference: because the grating is written and erased optically, the same device could be tested as a programmable frequency translator by sequentially poling different resonances and checking whether old gratings survive or must be rewritten, which would determine how quickly the device can be reconfigured in a real system.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a silicon nitride photonic device consisting of two racetrack resonators—one for the pump (south) and one for the second harmonic (north)—that are intended to be linearly uncoupled but share a common interaction region where a photoinduced χ(2) grating is inscribed. The authors demonstrate reconfigurable doubly resonant second-harmonic generation across the C and L telecom bands with milliwatt-level output powers, and they use the same device to generate and upconvert a Kerr frequency comb with a pump-bandwidth of roughly 100 nm and upconverted power up to 10 mW. The central claim is that separating the pump and second-harmonic resonances into two independently addressable, linearly uncoupled resonators overcomes the bandwidth and tunability limitations of single-resonator SHG.

Significance. If the claims hold, this work is significant: it addresses a long-standing limitation of microresonator-based SHG—the simultaneous satisfaction of phase matching, double resonance, and FSR matching—by introducing a design in which the pump and SH resonances can be tuned independently. The experimental dataset is extensive and internally consistent in many respects: transmission spectra with loaded Q factors, SHG maps, a quadratic power-scaling fit with slope 2.02, two-photon microscope imaging of the χ(2) grating, and comb generation/upconversion spectra. The approach is CMOS-compatible and, in principle, transferable to other material platforms. However, the enabling premise of linear uncoupling is only partially verified, and several reported metrics are mutually inconsistent, so the strength of the central claim is not yet fully established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (3); Supplementary Notes 1 and 4] The theoretical model sets σ_SH = κ_FH = 1, i.e., it assumes perfect linear uncoupling and factorizes the nonlinear response into independent north and south field enhancements. However, Supplementary Note 1 documents residual linear coupling in the pump band (visibility loss, linewidth broadening, and an anticrossing-type hybridization with a north-resonator TE00 mode) that the MZI heater can only compensate over a limited spectral window. Supplementary Note 4 then shows that for the MI comb the coupling is deliberately increased, producing an anticrossing-type perturbation of the integrated dispersion. Consequently, the assumption underlying Eq. (3) and Eq. (5) is not satisfied over the claimed operating bandwidth, and the factorization into independent field enhancements is an approximation whose accuracy is not quantified. The authors should quantify the residual coupling (e.g., from visibility and linewidth changes) and assess how it affects the predicted conversion efficiency and the independence of the two resonance families.
  2. [Discussion, first paragraph; Supplementary Note 4] The Discussion states that a key advantage of the design is 'avoiding (or controlling) alterations to the dispersion profile associated with mode anti-crossings', but Supplementary Note 4 explains that the MI comb is formed by deliberately increasing the linear coupling, which 'produces an anticrossing-type perturbation ... facilitating the formation of MI combs'. These statements are in tension: the comb demonstration relies on a coupling that the paradigm is claimed to avoid. The manuscript should clarify that the uncoupled regime is an operating point used for SHG, whereas the coupled regime is intentionally exploited for comb generation, and that the device does not universally eliminate linear coupling.
  3. [Results, 'Addressable doubly resonant SHG'; Discussion] The paper reports a maximum SH power of 10 mW for a pump power of 220 mW and a maximum conversion efficiency of 40%/W. With CE = P_SH/P_FH^2, a CE of 40%/W at P_FH = 220 mW would yield P_SH ≈ 19 mW, roughly twice the reported maximum; conversely, 10 mW at 220 mW gives CE ≈ 20%/W. The authors should specify the pump conditions under which each value was obtained and explain whether thermal shifts, AOP reconfiguration, or other effects cause the CE to decrease at high power.
  4. [Abstract; Fig. 2c] The abstract claims 'milliwatt-level addressable second-harmonic generation over the entire telecom band', but the demonstrated range is 1530-1620 nm (the C and L bands, about 90 nm), and the text notes that this is limited by amplifier availability. The term 'entire telecom band' is an overstatement; the authors should either quantify the demonstrated range precisely or soften the claim (e.g., to 'C and L bands').
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (3)] The notation for the coupling coefficients is confusing when σ_SH = κ_FH = 1; please clarify the values of σ_FH and κ_SH used for the numerical estimate.
  2. [Fig. 2d-e] The statement that TPM imaging 'confirm[s] the linearly uncoupled nature' is not direct evidence: TPM reveals the spatial distribution of χ(2), not the absence of linear coupling. Please rephrase to avoid over-interpretation.
  3. [References] Reference [26] appears to contain an arXiv identifier rather than a completed journal citation; please update it.
  4. [Supplementary Figure 6] The conversion efficiencies across the C/L bands show considerable scatter (from about 1% to about 15%/W); the manuscript should comment on this wavelength dependence and its relation to the 'addressable' claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central SHG-power and comb claims are experimental, and the theoretical estimate uses independently assumed parameters and measured Q factors rather than fitting the reported output.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the only quantitative model is the Methods SHG formula (Eq. 2), which predicts P_SH ~ 20 mW and CE ~ 22%/W from an assumed chi2_eff = 0.1 pm/V and from measured loaded and coupling Q factors (Eq. 5). The measured CE is ~40%/W, so the prediction is not forced by fitting the target result. The factorized form of the overlap integral (Eq. 3) invokes the ideal condition sigma_SH = kappa_FH = 1; this is an explicitly stated modelling assumption, not a quantity derived from the data used as a prediction. The paper supplies independent evidence for approximate linear uncoupling: two-camera imaging of pump and SH circulation, TPM localization of the chi(2) grating to the interaction region, and independent heater shifts of the two resonance combs. Supplementary Notes 1 and 4 document residual linear coupling and the deliberate use of coupling for the MI comb, which qualify the assumption and are a robustness/correctness concern rather than a circular step, because the paper never derives the uncoupled condition from the same data it subsequently claims to explain. The comb-upconversion envelope matching the squared FH envelope is an independent consistency check. The numerous self-citations to prior AOP and linearly-uncoupled-resonator work anchor the device concept and parameter values, but the headline claims (milliwatt-level addressable SHG, >100 nm upconverted comb, 10 mW per line) are experimental observations; the theoretical model is a post-hoc estimate that under-predicts the measured efficiency. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. Overall, no step reduces an output to an input by construction, so the paper has no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on the established all-optical poling effect in Si3N4 and the linearly uncoupled resonator concept from prior theory. The main free parameter is the assumed chi2_eff, which is not fitted to the present data. The load-bearing domain assumptions are linear uncoupling across the band and FSR matching by loop-length design, both of which the paper partially verifies but also shows to be imperfect.

free parameters (1)
  • effective second-order susceptibility chi2_eff = 0.1 pm/V (assumed from prior AOP experiments, not fitted to this data)
    Used in the theoretical model (Methods, Eq. 2) to estimate PSH ~20 mW at 300 mW pump and CE ~22%/W; the measured 40%/W is close but the value is not fitted to the present data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The two resonators can be treated as linearly uncoupled but nonlinearly coupled when the MZI couplers approach 100:0 and 0:100 splitting in the two bands.
    Central to the device concept. The paper relies on the theory of linearly uncoupled resonators (Refs 30-35) and demonstrates mitigation of residual coupling via the MZI heater (Supplementary Note 1), but the assumption is not perfectly satisfied across the band (Supplementary Note 4 shows residual anticrossing and linewidth broadening).
  • domain assumption The FSR matching condition FSR_FH = vFH_g/LFH = vSH_g/LSH (Eq. 1) can be met by engineering the two loop lengths.
    This design equation assumes known group velocities and that fabrication yields the designed loop lengths; residual mismatch is admitted in the text and affects comb upconversion bandwidth.
  • domain assumption The photoinduced chi(2) grating in the interaction region satisfies the QPM condition with period Lambda = 4.35 um and persists in the cold-cavity regime.
    Uses the AOP process from prior works (Refs 15-24); the period is verified by TPM imaging and simulations, but persistence and reconfigurability are assumed from Ref 36 and Ref 37.
  • standard math The standard Hamiltonian treatment of chi(2) nonlinear optics in the backward Heisenberg picture (Eq. 2) is valid for this device.
    Theoretical model for PSH follows Ref 50; standard quantum-optical formalism.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrabroadband Milliwatt-Level Resonant Frequency Doubling on a Chip." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BGN2DQKY

@misc{pith2026241203322,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrabroadband Milliwatt-Level Resonant Frequency Doubling on a Chip},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BGN2DQKY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03322}
}
abstract

Microresonators are powerful tools to enhance the efficiency of second-order nonlinear optical processes, such as second-harmonic generation, which can coherently bridge octave-spaced spectral bands. However, dispersion constraints such as phase-matching and doubly resonant conditions have so far limited demonstrations to narrowband operation. In this work, we overcome these limitations showing ultrabroadband resonant frequency doubling in a novel integrated device, wherein the resonant enhancement of pump and second harmonic are individually addressed in two distinct and linearly uncoupled microring resonators, each adjusted to target the respective spectral band. The two microresonators are designed and tuned independently, yet share a common interaction region that grants nonlinear coupling over a quasi-phase-matching bandwidth exceeding 200 nm, enabled by the inscription of a photoinduced $\chi^{(2)}$ grating. The system allows to not only conveniently disentangle the design parameters of the two microresonators but also to reconfigure the doubly resonant condition electrically, and the phase-matching condition optically. We demonstrate milliwatt-level addressable second-harmonic generation over the entire telecom band and then configure the device to internally generate and upconvert a Kerr frequency comb with bandwidth exceeding 100 nm and upconverted power up to 10 mW.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03322 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optical Switching of $\chi^{(2)}$ in Diamond Photonics

    physics.optics 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Green illumination reversibly quenches second-harmonic generation in a diamond microdisk because nitrogen-vacancy centers switch from a charged to a neutral state, showing that diamond's effective nonlinearity can be ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics , 4th ed. (Academic Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Svelto, Principles of Lasers (Springer US, 2010)

    O. Svelto, Principles of Lasers (Springer US, 2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Campagnola, Second harmonic generation imaging mi- croscopy: Applications to diseases diagnostics, Analyti- cal Chemistry 83, 3224 (2011)

    P. Campagnola, Second harmonic generation imaging mi- croscopy: Applications to diseases diagnostics, Analyti- cal Chemistry 83, 3224 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Trebino, Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating: The Measurement of Ultrashort Laser Pulses (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2000)

    R. Trebino, Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating: The Measurement of Ultrashort Laser Pulses (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Y. R. Shen, Optical second harmonic generation at in- terfaces, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 40, 327 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, A. V. Sergienko, and Y. Shih, New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs, Physical Review Letters 75, 4337 (1995)

    1995

  7. [7]

    J. U. Fürst, D. V. Strekalov, D. Elser, M. Lassen, U. L. Andersen, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, Nat- urally phase-matched second-harmonic generation in a whispering-gallery-mode resonator, Physical Review Let- ters 104, 153901 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    J. Wang, M. Clementi, M. Minkov, A. Barone, J.-F. Car- lin, et al. , Doubly resonant second-harmonic generation of a vortex beam from a bound state in the continuum, Optica 7, 1126 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    J. Lu, M. Li, C.-L. Zou, A. Al Sayem, and H. X. Tang, Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodi- cally poled lithium niobate microring resonators, Optica 7, 1654 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    A. W. Bruch, X. Liu, X. Guo, J. B. Surya, Z. Gong, et al. , 17 000%/W second-harmonic conversion efficiency in single-crystalline aluminum nitride microresonators, Applied Physics Letters 113, 131102 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    P. S. Kuo, J. Bravo-Abad, and G. S. Solomon, Second- harmonic generation using 4-quasi-phasematching in a GaAs whispering-gallery-mode microcavity, Nature Communications 5, 1 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    D. P. Lake, M. Mitchell, H. Jayakumar, L. F. dos Santos, D. Curic, and P. E. Barclay, Efficient telecom to visible wavelength conversion in doubly resonant gallium phos- phide microdisks, Applied Physics Letters 108, 031109 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    D. M. Lukin, C. Dory, M. A. Guidry, K. Y. Yang, S. D. Mishra, R. Trivedi, M. Radulaski, S. Sun, D. Ver- cruysse, G. H. Ahn, and J. Vučković, 4H-silicon-carbide- on-insulator for integrated quantum and nonlinear pho- tonics, Nature Photonics 14, 330 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    J. Liu, G. Huang, R. N. Wang, J. He, A. S. Raja, et al. , High-yield, wafer-scale fabrication of ultralow- loss, dispersion-engineered silicon nitride photonic cir- cuits, Nature Communications 12, 2236 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Billat, D

    A. Billat, D. Grassani, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, S. Kharitonov, T. J. Kippenberg, et al. , Large second harmonic gener- ation enhancement in Si3N4 waveguides by all-optically induced quasi-phase-matching, Nature Communications 8, 1016 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    M. A. Porcel, J. Mak, C. Taballione, V. K. Schermer- horn, J. P. Epping, et al. , Photo-induced second-order nonlinearity in stoichiometric silicon nitride waveguides, Optics Express 25, 33143 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    D. D. Hickstein, D. R. Carlson, H. Mundoor, J. B. Khur- gin, K. Srinivasan, D. Westly, A. Kowligy, I. I. Smalyukh, S. A. Diddams, and S. B. Papp, Self-organized nonlinear gratings for ultrafast nanophotonics, Nature Photonics 13, 494 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Yakar, E

    O. Yakar, E. Nitiss, J. Hu, and C.-S. Brès, Generalized coherent photogalvanic effect in coherently seeded waveg- uides, Laser and Photonics Reviews , 2200294 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    X. Lu, G. Moille, A. Rao, D. A. Westly, and K. Srini- vasan, Efficient photoinduced second-harmonic genera- tion in silicon nitride photonics, Nature Photonics 15, 131 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Nitiss, J

    E. Nitiss, J. Hu, A. Stroganov, and C.-S. Brès, Optically reconfigurable quasi-phase-matching in silicon nitride mi- croresonators, Nature Photonics 16, 134 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Nitiss, B

    E. Nitiss, B. Zabelich, O. Yakar, J. Liu, R. N. Wang, T. J. Kippenberg, and C.-S. Brès, Broadband quasi-phase- matching in dispersion-engineered all-optically poled sil- icon nitride waveguides, Photonics Research 8, 1475 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Clementi, E

    M. Clementi, E. Nitiss, J. Liu, E. Durán-Valdeiglesias, S. Belahsene, H. Debrégeas, T. J. Kippenberg, and C.- S. Brès, A chip-scale second-harmonic source via self- injection-locked all-optical poling, Light: Science & Ap- plications 12, 296 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    B. Li, Z. Yuan, W. Jin, L. Wu, J. Guo, Q.-X. Ji, A. Fe- shali, M. Paniccia, J. E. Bowers, and K. J. Vahala, High-coherence hybrid-integrated 780 nm source by self- injection-locked second-harmonic generation in a high-q silicon-nitride resonator, Optica 10, 1241 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Nitiss, B

    E. Nitiss, B. Zabelich, J. Hu, A. Stroganov, and C.-S. 10 Brés, Tunable photo-induced second-harmonic genera- tion in a mode-engineered silicon nitride microresonator, Optics Express 31, 14442 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Miller, K

    S. Miller, K. Luke, Y. Okawachi, J. Cardenas, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, On-chip frequency comb gener- ation at visible wavelengths via simultaneous second- and third-order optical nonlinearities, Optics Express 22, 26517 (2014)

    2014

  18. [27]

    Guo, C.-L

    X. Guo, C.-L. Zou, H. Jung, Z. Gong, A. Bruch, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Efficient generation of a near-visible fre- quency comb via cherenkov-like radiation from a kerr mi- crocomb, Physical Review Applied 10, 014012 (2018)

    2018

  19. [28]

    He, Q.-F

    Y. He, Q.-F. Yang, J. Ling, R. Luo, H. Liang, M. Li, B. Shen, H. Wang, K. Vahala, and Q. Lin, Self-starting bi-chromatic LiNbO3 soliton microcomb, Optica 6, 1138 (2019)

    2019

  20. [29]

    D. J. Wilson, K. Schneider, S. Hönl, M. Anderson, Y. Baumgartner, L. Czornomaz, T. J. Kippenberg, and P. Seidler, Integrated gallium phosphide nonlinear pho- tonics, Nature Photonics 14, 57 (2020)

    2020

  21. [30]

    Menotti, B

    M. Menotti, B. Morrison, K. Tan, Z. Vernon, J. E. Sipe, and M. Liscidini, Nonlinear coupling of linearly uncou- pled resonators, Physical Review Letters 122, 013904 (2019)

    2019

  22. [31]

    K. Tan, M. Menotti, Z. Vernon, J. E. Sipe, M. Liscidini, and B. Morrison, Stimulated four-wave mixing in linearly uncoupled resonators, Optics Letters 45, 873 (2020)

    2020

  23. [32]

    F. A. Sabattoli, H. El Dirani, L. Youssef, F. Garrisi, D. Grassani, L. Zatti, C. Petit-Etienne, E. Pargon, J. E. Sipe, M. Liscidini, C. Sciancalepore, D. Bajoni, and M. Galli, Suppression of parasitic nonlinear processes in spontaneous four-wave mixing with linearly uncoupled ...

    2021

  24. [33]

    F. A. Sabattoli, H. El Dirani, L. Youssef, L. Gian- ini, L. Zatti, F. Garrisi, D. Grassani, C. Petit-Etienne, E. Pargon, J. E. Sipe, M. Liscidini, C. Sciancalepore, D. Bajoni, and M. Galli, Nonlinear coupling of linearly uncoupled resonators through a mach–dzehnder interfer- o...

    2022

  25. [34]

    Zatti, N

    L. Zatti, N. Bergamasco, E. Lomonte, F. Lenzini, W. Per- nice, and M. Liscidini, Spontaneous parametric downcon- version in linearly uncoupled resonators, Optics Letters 47, 1766 (2022)

    2022

  26. [35]

    Zatti, J

    L. Zatti, J. E. Sipe, and M. Liscidini, Generation of pho- ton pairs by spontaneous four-wave mixing in linearly uncoupled resonators, Phys. Rev. A 107, 013514 (2023)

    2023

  27. [36]

    Nitiss, T

    E. Nitiss, T. Liu, D. Grassani, M. Pfeiffer, T. J. Kippen- berg, et al. , Formation rules and dynamics of photoin- duced χ (2) gratings in silicon nitride waveguides, ACS Photonics 7, 147 (2020)

    2020

  28. [37]

    J. Zhou, J. Hu, M. Clementi, O. Yakar, E. Nitiss, A. Stroganov, and C.-s. Brès, Self-organized spatiotem- poral quasi-phase-matching in microresonators, Nature Communications 16, 4083 (2025)

    2025

  29. [39]

    P.-K. Chen, I. Briggs, C. Cui, L. Zhang, M. Shah, and L. Fan, Adapted poling to break the nonlinear efficiency limit in nanophotonic lithium niobate waveguides, Na- ture Nanotechnology 19, 44 (2024)

    2024

  30. [40]

    J. Lu, J. B. Surya, X. Liu, A. W. Bruch, Z. Gong, Y. Xu, and H. X. Tang, Periodically poled thin-film lithium nio- bate microring resonators with a second-harmonic gener- ation efficiency of 250,000%/W, Optica 6, 1455 (2019)

    2019

  31. [41]

    Guo, C.-L

    X. Guo, C.-L. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Second- harmonic generation in aluminum nitride microrings with 2500%/W conversion efficiency, Optica 3, 1126 (2016)

    2016

  32. [42]

    Ó. B. Helgason, M. Girardi, Z. Ye, F. Lei, J. Schröder, and V. Torres-Company, Surpassing the nonlinear con- version efficiency of soliton microcombs, Nature Photon- ics 17, 992 (2023)

    2023

  33. [43]

    Q. X. Ji, P. Liu, W. Jin, J. Guo, L. Wu, Z. Yuan, J. Pe- ters, A. Feshali, M. Paniccia, J. E. Bowers, and K. J. Vahala, Multimodality integrated microresonators using the Moiré speedup effect, Science (New York, N.Y.) 383, 1080 (2024)

    2024

  34. [44]

    Zhang, M

    Y. Zhang, M. Menotti, K. Tan, V. D. Vaidya, D. H. Mahler, L. G. Helt, L. Zatti, M. Liscidini, B. Morri- son, and Z. Vernon, Squeezed light from a nanophotonic molecule, Nature Communications 12, 2233 (2021)

    2021

  35. [45]

    Nigro, M

    D. Nigro, M. Clementi, C.-S. Brés, M. Liscidini, and D. Gerace, Single-photon nonlinearities and blockade from a strongly driven photonic molecule, Optics Letters 47, 5348 (2022)

    2022

  36. [46]

    Ledezma, A

    L. Ledezma, A. Roy, L. Costa, R. Sekine, R. Gray, Q. Guo, R. Nehra, R. M. Briggs, and A. Marandi, Octave-spanning tunable infrared parametric oscillators in nanophotonics, Science Advances 9, 1 (2023)

    2023

  37. [47]

    H. S. Stokowski, D. J. Dean, A. Y. Hwang, T. Park, O. T. Celik, T. P. McKenna, M. Jankowski, C. Lan- grock, V. Ansari, M. M. Fejer, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Integrated frequency-modulated optical parametric oscil- lator, Nature 627, 95 (2024)

    2024

  38. [48]

    Sahin, B

    E. Sahin, B. Zabelich, O. Yakar, E. Nitiss, J. Liu, R. N. Wang, T. J. Kippenberg, and C.-S. Brès, Difference- frequency generation in optically poled silicon nitride waveguides, Nanophotonics 10, 1923 (2021)

    2021

  39. [49]

    Dalidet, F

    R. Dalidet, F. Mazeas, E. Nitiss, O. Yakar, A. Stroganov, S. Tanzilli, L. Labonté, and C.-S. Brès, Near perfect two- photon interference out of a down-converter on a silicon photonic chip, Optics Express 30, 11298 (2022)

    2022

  40. [50]

    Liscidini, L

    M. Liscidini, L. G. Helt, and J. E. Sipe, Asymptotic fields for a hamiltonian treatment of nonlinear electromagnetic phenomena, Physical Review A 85, 013833 (2012)

    2012

  41. [51]

    National Quantum Science and Technology Institute

    Z. Yang, M. Liscidini, and J. E. Sipe, Spontaneous parametric down-conversion in waveguides: A backward heisenberg picture approach, Physical Review A 77, 033808 (2008) . Acknowledgements M.C., J.Z., and C.-S.B. acknowledge funding by the European Re- search Council grant PISS...

    2008

  42. [53]

    Nitiss, B

    E. Nitiss, B. Zabelich, J. Hu, A. Stroganov, and C.-S. Brés, Tunable photo-induced second-harmonic generation in a mode- engineered silicon nitride microresonator, Optics Express 31, 14442 (2023)

    2023

  43. [54]

    Clementi, E

    M. Clementi, E. Nitiss, J. Liu, E. Durán-Valdeiglesias, S. Belahsene, H. Debrégeas, T. J. Kippenberg, and C.-S. Brès, A chip-scale second-harmonic source via self-injection-locked all-optical poling, Light: Science & Applications 12, 296 (2023)

    2023

  44. [55]

    J. Hu, E. Nitiss, J. He, J. Liu, O. Yakar, W. Weng, T. J. Kippenberg, and C.-S. Brès, Photo-induced cascaded harmonic and comb generation in silicon nitride microresonators, Science Advances 8, 2203.15889 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  45. [56]

    X. Xue, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Normal-dispersion microresonator kerr frequency combs, Nanophotonics 5, 244 (2016)

    2016

  46. [57]

    Fujii, Y

    S. Fujii, Y. Okabe, R. Suzuki, T. Kato, A. Hori, Y. Honda, and T. Tanabe, Analysis of mode coupling assisted kerr comb generation in normal dispersion system, IEEE Photonics Journal 10, 1 (2018)

    2018

  47. [1123]

    186 µm) for the FH (SH) optical path

    83 µm (1129. 186 µm) for the FH (SH) optical path. The south resonator is coupled to the bus waveguide through a point coupler with 0. 67 µm gap, while the north resonator relies on a 62. 1 µm long directional coupler with 0. 3 µm gap to efficiently in- and out-couple light to t...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.