Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Explainable deepfake and spoofing detection: an attack analysis using SHapley Additive exPlanations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.13693 v2 pith:BHUQWVUX submitted 2022-02-28 eess.AS cs.SD

classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords artefactsspoofingadditiveanalysisattackattacksclassifiersdeepfake
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite several years of research in deepfake and spoofing detection for automatic speaker verification, little is known about the artefacts that classifiers use to distinguish between bona fide and spoofed utterances. An understanding of these is crucial to the design of trustworthy, explainable solutions. In this paper we report an extension of our previous work to better understand classifier behaviour to the use of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to attack analysis. Our goal is to identify the artefacts that characterise utterances generated by different attacks algorithms. Using a pair of classifiers which operate either upon raw waveforms or magnitude spectrograms, we show that visualisations of SHAP results can be used to identify attack-specific artefacts and the differences and consistencies between synthetic speech and converted voice spoofing attacks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools