Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Will Gravitational Wave Sirens Determine the Hubble Constant?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.07775 v1 pith:BKEE4FYV submitted 2018-12-19 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords constanthubblemodelbackgroundbiasesestimationexpansiongravitational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Lack of knowledge about the background expansion history of the Universe from independent observations makes it problematic to obtain a precise and accurate estimation of the Hubble constant $H_0$ from gravitational wave standard sirens, even with electromagnetic counterpart redshifts. Simply fitting simultaneously for the matter density in a flat \lcdm\ model can reduce the precision on $H_0$ from 1\% to 5\%, while not knowing the actual background expansion model of the universe (e.g.\ form of dark energy) can introduce substantial bias in estimation of the Hubble constant. When the statistical precision is at the level of 1\% uncertainty on $H_0$, biases in non-\lcdm\ cosmologies that are consistent with current data could reach the 3$\sigma$ level. To avoid model-dependent biases, statistical techniques that are appropriately agnostic about model assumptions need to be employed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Hubble constant tension with next-generation galaxy surveys

    astro-ph.CO 2019-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Forecast: Euclid-like and SKA-like BAO surveys, combined with Gaussian-process regression, could measure H0 to about 1% precision and discriminate between Planck and Riess values at roughly 5 sigma.

Pith tools