pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.05005 · v1 · pith:BKSTWI3Wnew · submitted 2019-07-11 · 🧮 math.PR

A discontinuous phase transition in the threshold-θ geq 2 contact process on random graphs

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 23:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.PR
keywords contact processrandom graphsphase transitionmetastabilitythreshold modeldiscontinuous transitionsurvival timeextinction time
0
0 comments X

The pith

The threshold-θ contact process on random graphs with degrees at least θ+2 switches discontinuously from logarithmic extinction to exponential survival.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the discrete-time threshold-θ contact process, in which a healthy node becomes infected only when at least θ of its neighbors are already infected, on random graphs whose degrees are drawn from a distribution μ. When μ is bounded below by θ+2 and has all moments finite, the process exhibits a discontinuous phase transition: above a critical infection probability p1 it persists for time exponential in the number of nodes while keeping a macroscopic infected fraction, yet for any p less than 1 a small initial seed dies out in logarithmic time with high probability. The same model on random (θ+1)-regular graphs dies out in polynomial time. The result resolves an open question on whether the transition in metastability is discontinuous. The findings matter because they separate regimes in which local spreading either collapses quickly or maintains itself globally on large networks.

Core claim

If the degree distribution μ is lower bounded by θ+2 and has finite kth moments for all k>0, then for p>p1 the process survives for e^Θ(n) time w.h.p. maintaining large density, while for p<1 and small initial density it dies out in O(log n) time w.h.p.; on (θ+1)-regular graphs it dies out in n^O(1) time w.h.p.

What carries the argument

The threshold-θ contact process on random graphs with prescribed degree distribution μ, whose update rule requires θ infected neighbors for infection to occur.

If this is right

  • Above p1 the process started from the all-infected state maintains positive density for time exponential in n with high probability.
  • Below p=1 any sufficiently small initial set of infected nodes dies out in O(log n) time with high probability.
  • On random (θ+1)-regular graphs the process dies out in time n to a polynomial power with high probability.
  • The same discontinuous behavior extends to Erdős-Rényi graphs under the stated degree conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The sharp separation between survival and extinction times may appear in other threshold-based spreading models on heterogeneous networks.
  • Empirical networks whose degree sequences satisfy the lower bound could be tested for similar jumps in observed persistence times.
  • Interventions that reduce effective degrees below θ+2 might force rapid extinction even at moderate transmission rates.

Load-bearing premise

The degree distribution must be bounded below by θ+2 and possess finite moments of every order.

What would settle it

Simulate the process on a sequence of random graphs with the required degree distribution and measure whether the survival time jumps from O(log n) or polynomial to exp(Θ(n)) as the infection probability crosses p1.

read the original abstract

We study the discrete-time threshold-$\theta \geq 2$ contact process on random graphs of general degrees. For random graphs with a given degree distribution $\mu$, we show that if $\mu$ is lower bounded by $\theta+2$ and has finite $k$th moments for all $k>0$, then the discrete-time threshold-$\theta$ contact process on the random graph exhibits a discontinuous phase transition in the emergence of metastability, thus answering a question of Chatterjee and Durrett \cite{cd13}. To be specific, we establish that (i) for any large enough infection probability $p>p_1$, the process started from the all-infected state w.h.p. survives for $e^{\Theta(n)}$-time, maintaining a large density of infection; (ii) for any $p<1$, if the initial density is smaller than $\varepsilon(p)>0$, then it dies out in $O(\log n)$-time w.h.p.. We also explain some extensions to more general random graphs, including the Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi graphs. Moreover, we prove that the threshold-$\theta$ contact process on a random $(\theta+1)$-regular graph dies out in time $n^{O(1)}$ w.h.p..

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves that the discrete-time threshold-θ (θ≥2) contact process on random graphs with degree distribution μ (lower-bounded by θ+2 and possessing all finite moments) exhibits a discontinuous phase transition. For p>p1 the process started from the all-infected state survives for e^Θ(n) time w.h.p. while keeping positive density; for p<1 and sufficiently small initial density it dies out in O(log n) time w.h.p. Extensions to Erdős-Rényi graphs are indicated, and polynomial-time extinction is shown on (θ+1)-regular random graphs. The results answer a question of Chatterjee and Durrett.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies the first rigorous demonstration of discontinuity for θ≥2, together with explicit exponential survival and logarithmic extinction timescales that are load-bearing for the metastability claim. The explicit hypotheses on μ (minimum degree θ+2 and all moments finite) are used to obtain both the long survival and rapid extinction statements, and the paper provides machine-checkable-style probabilistic arguments under these conditions.

minor comments (2)
  1. The constant p1 is introduced in the abstract and results statements without an explicit definition or construction; a brief indication of how p1 is obtained (e.g., via a branching-process comparison or fixed-point equation) would improve readability even if the full construction appears later.
  2. The phrase 'large density of infection' in the survival statement could be replaced by a concrete lower bound (e.g., δ>0 independent of n) to make the metastability claim fully quantitative at the statement level.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment and recommendation to accept the manuscript. The report accurately summarizes the main results on the discontinuous phase transition for the threshold-θ contact process under the stated conditions on μ.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper states its main results explicitly as conditional on the degree distribution μ having support bounded below by θ+2 and all moments finite; these hypotheses are used directly to establish the survival and extinction time bounds via standard probabilistic arguments on random graphs. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked in a load-bearing way that reduces the claimed times or phase transition to definitions or prior self-work by construction. The derivation relies on external techniques from percolation and contact process literature (including the cited Chatterjee-Durrett question) without renaming known results or smuggling ansatzes. The central claims remain independent of the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard tools of random-graph theory and interacting particle systems; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard results on the configuration model and properties of random graphs with given degree distribution having finite moments.
    Invoked to control the local structure and expansion properties used in the survival and extinction arguments.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5761 in / 1258 out tokens · 29901 ms · 2026-05-24T23:13:57.541013+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adler and U

    J. Adler and U. Lev. Bootstrap percolation: Visualizations and applications. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 33:641–644, 2003

  2. [2]

    Bhamidi, D

    S. Bhamidi, D. Nam, O. Nguyen, and A. Sly. Survival and extinction of epidemics on random graphs with general degree. preprint, arXiv:1902.03263v2, 2019

  3. [3]

    Bollob´ as and F

    B. Bollob´ as and F. de la Vega. The diameter of random regular graphs , volume 2. 1982

  4. [4]

    Bramson and L

    M. Bramson and L. Gray. A useful renormalization argument. In Random Walks, Brownian Motion, and Interacting Particle Systems. Progress in Probability , volume 28, pages 113–152. Birkh¨ auser, Boston, 1991

  5. [5]

    Chatterjee and R

    S. Chatterjee and R. Durrett. A first order phase transition in the threshold θ≥ 2 contact process on random r-regular graphs and r-trees. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 123(2):561–578, 2013

  6. [6]

    H.-N. Chen. On the stability of a population growth model with sexual reproduction on Z2. Ann. Probab., 20(1):232–285, 1992. 20

  7. [7]

    H.-N. Chen. On the stability of a population growth model with sexual reproduction on Zd, d≥ 2. Ann. Probab., 22(3):1195–1226, 1994

  8. [8]

    Dembo and A

    A. Dembo and A. Montanari. Gibbs measures and phase transitions on sparse random graphs. Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics , 24(2):137–211, 2010

  9. [9]

    Durrett and L

    R. Durrett and L. Gray. Some peculiar properties of a particle system with sexual reproduction. Unpublished manuscript, 1985

  10. [10]

    L. R. G. Fontes and R. H. Schonmann. Threshold θ≥ 2 contact processes on homogeneous trees. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 141(3-4):513–541, 2008

  11. [11]

    Frieze and M

    A. Frieze and M. Karo´ nski. Introduction to random graphs . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016

  12. [12]

    S. Janson. The probability that a random multigraph is simple. Combin. Probab. Comput. , 18(1-2):205–225, 2009

  13. [13]

    Janson and M

    S. Janson and M. J. Luczak. A simple solution to the k-core problem. Random Structures Algorithms, 30(1-2):50–62, 2007

  14. [14]

    Random graphs

    Svante Janson, Tomasz L uczak, and Andrzej Rucinski. Random graphs. Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2000

  15. [15]

    J. H. Kim. Poisson cloning model for random graphs, International Congress of Mathemati- cians. Vol. III. Eur. Math. Soc. , pages 873–897, 2006

  16. [16]

    Mikosch and Nagaev A

    T. Mikosch and Nagaev A. V. Large deviations of heavy-tailed sums with applications in insurance. Extremes, 1(1):81–110, 1998

  17. [17]

    Mountford and R

    T. Mountford and R. H. Schonmann. The survival of large dimensional threshold contact processes. Ann. Probab., 37(4):1483–1501, 2009

  18. [18]

    S. V. Nagaev. Large deviations of sums of independent random variables. Ann. Probab., 7(5):745–789, 1979

  19. [19]

    A. L. Toom. Nonergodic multidimensional systems of automata. Probl. Inf. Transm., 10:239– 246, 1974

  20. [20]

    van der Hofstad

    R. van der Hofstad. Random Graphs and Complex Networks, Volume 1 . Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics, [43]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017. 21