The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 1912.10981 · v1 · pith:BM6ZRXJN · submitted 2019-12-23 · stat.CO · stat.AP· stat.ME

Missing data analysis and imputation via latent Gaussian Markov random fields

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BM6ZRXJNrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification stat.CO stat.APstat.ME
keywords modelcovariatesinlabayesianfittingframeworkimputationlatent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper we recast the problem of missing values in the covariates of a regression model as a latent Gaussian Markov random field (GMRF) model in a fully Bayesian framework. Our proposed approach is based on the definition of the covariate imputation sub-model as a latent effect with a GMRF structure. We show how this formulation works for continuous covariates and provide some insight on how this could be extended to categorical covariates. The resulting Bayesian hierarchical model naturally fits within the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) framework, which we use for model fitting. Hence, our work fills an important gap in the INLA methodology as it allows to treat models with missing values in the covariates. As in any other fully Bayesian framework, by relying on INLA for model fitting it is possible to formulate a joint model for the data, the imputed covariates and their missingness mechanism. In this way, we are able to tackle the more general problem of assessing the missingness mechanism by conducting a sensitivity analysis on the different alternatives to model the non-observed covariates. Finally, we illustrate the proposed approach with two examples on modeling health risk factors and disease mapping. Here, we rely on two different imputation mechanisms based on a typical multiple linear regression and a spatial model, respectively. Given the speed of model fitting with INLA we are able to fit joint models in a short time, and to easily conduct sensitivity analyses.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. False Positives, False Negatives, and the Detection-Only Problem: A Hierarchical Model for Species Occurrence with Observation Error

    stat.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Presents a unified hierarchical framework treating DN-T and DO data as special cases, with a new model for detection-only data that accounts for both false positive and false negative errors via informative priors.