Pith. sign in

REVIEW

New results on graph matching from degree preserving growth

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.07423 v3 pith:BMAJJL2D submitted 2022-04-15 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords degreesequencematchingsemphmatchingsizegraphnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The recently introduced \emph{Degree Preserving Growth} model (Nature Physics, \DOI{10.1038/s41567-021-01417-7}) uses matchings to insert new vertices of prescribed degrees into the current graph of an ever-growing graph sequence. The process depends both on the size of the largest available matchings, which is our focus here, as well as on the actual choice of the matching. First we show that the question whether a graphic degree sequence, extended with a new degree $2\delta$ remains graphic is closely related to the available matchings in the realizations of the sequence. Namely we prove that the extension problem is equivalent to the existence of a realization of the original degree sequence with a matching of size $\delta$. Second we present lower bounds for the \emph{forcible matching number} of degree sequences. This number is the size of the maximum matchings in any realization of the degree sequence. We then study bounds on the size of maximal matchings in \emph{some} realizations of the sequence, known as the \emph{potential matching number}. We also estimate the minimum size of both the maximal and the maximum matchings, as determined by the degree sequence, independently of graphical realizations. Along this line we answer a question raised by Biedl, Demaine \emph{et al.} (\DOI{10.1016/j.disc.2004.05.003}).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools