Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Supercomputing with MPI meets the Common Workflow Language standards: an experience report

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.00422 v1 pith:BN2JITXI submitted 2020-10-01 cs.DC

classification cs.DC
keywords describestandardscommonexperiencelanguagesimpleworkflowadopted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Use of standards-based workflows is still somewhat unusual by high-performance computing users. In this paper we describe the experience of using the Common Workflow Language (CWL) standards to describe the execution, in parallel, of MPI-parallelised applications. In particular, we motivate and describe the simple extension to the specification which was required, as well as our implementation of this within the CWL reference runner. We discuss some of the unexpected benefits, such as simple use of HPC-oriented performance measurement tools, and CWL software requirements interfacing with HPC module systems. We close with a request for comment from the community on how these features could be adopted within versions of the CWL standards.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools