Circadian output network can buffer period variability

Hiroshi Ito; Hotaka Kaji; Ismail M Nur; Yuzuru Mitsui

arxiv: 2606.23114 · v1 · pith:BPUWL6YFnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🧬 q-bio.MN

Circadian output network can buffer period variability

Ismail M Nur , Hotaka Kaji , Yuzuru Mitsui , Hiroshi Ito This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 06:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.MN

keywords circadian rhythmsperiod variabilityoutput networknoise bufferingserial pathwayoscillation precisionself-sustained oscillator

0 comments

The pith

Circadian output networks actively reduce period variability from the core clock instead of simply relaying signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Numerical simulations of a self-sustained oscillator linked to downstream output pathways show that serial connections dampen fluctuations in oscillation period. The amount of damping varies with parameters in both the clock and the output layers, and in branched networks the shortest path length from the oscillator strongly influences the gain in precision. The buffering saturates once cascades become long, pointing to an embedded reliability mechanism inside typical circadian output architecture.

Core claim

Our numerical calculations demonstrated that a serial pathway does not merely relay timing signals but actively shapes rhythmic reliability. The extent of this reduction depended on parameters of both the clock and output systems. For more complex output networks, the shortest-path length from the core oscillator was a major determinant of increased oscillation precision. This noise-buffering effect saturated in long cascades.

What carries the argument

Serial output pathway coupled to a self-sustained oscillator, which reduces period variability through parameter-dependent damping.

If this is right

Output networks can improve the reliability of circadian timing without requiring changes to the core oscillator itself.
In branched output architectures, cells or tissues with shorter average path lengths from the clock will exhibit higher precision.
The saturation of buffering in long cascades limits how much additional reliability can be gained by extending pathways further.
Parameter tuning in both clock and output layers jointly determines the final level of period stability.
Complex output topologies inherently contain a precision-enhancing feature tied to network distance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If output networks evolved partly for noise buffering, then mutations that shorten or lengthen output paths should measurably alter rhythm precision in experiments.
The same distance-dependent damping could apply to other intracellular oscillators, such as cell-cycle or metabolic rhythms.
Synthetic biology circuits could deliberately insert short serial output modules to stabilize engineered oscillators against molecular noise.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen numerical model of the self-sustained oscillator coupled to an output network and the way period variability is quantified in the simulations are representative of real cellular circadian systems.

What would settle it

Direct measurement in living cells showing that adding or lengthening output pathways either leaves period variability unchanged or increases it would falsify the buffering claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23114 by Hiroshi Ito, Hotaka Kaji, Ismail M Nur, Yuzuru Mitsui.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Minimum CV across networks with different connection topologies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Circadian rhythms are biological oscillations that govern 24-hour physiological and behavioral processes across most organisms. Recent bioimaging studies have revealed that even individual cells can exhibit circadian rhythms. The period of cellular oscillations can fluctuate due to molecular noise in the circadian clock machinery. Whether regulatory networks downstream of the clock amplify or attenuate clock-derived period fluctuations remains poorly understood. In this study, we numerically observed period variability in a self-sustained oscillator coupled to an output network. Our numerical calculations demonstrated that a serial pathway does not merely relay timing signals but actively shapes rhythmic reliability. The extent of this reduction depended on parameters of both the clock and output systems. For more complex output networks, the shortest-path length from the core oscillator was a major determinant of increased oscillation precision. This noise-buffering effect saturated in long cascades. These results suggest the existence of an intrinsic precision-enhancing mechanism embedded within circadian output networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Simulations in this model show serial output pathways can reduce period variability from the core clock, with path length as a factor, but the result stays internal to the chosen numerics.

read the letter

The paper's core finding is that in their self-sustained oscillator plus output network simulations, attaching serial cascades reduces period variability, with the reduction scaling by shortest path length from the core and saturating in longer chains. The effect also varies with clock and output parameters.

What stands out is the clean numerical demonstration that output networks do more than pass signals; they can actively damp fluctuations under the conditions they tested. The saturation result and the path-length dependence for complex networks are the most specific observations.

The main limitation is that everything traces back to one particular model setup and one way of measuring variability. The abstract gives no equations or parameter details, so it is difficult to judge robustness or how much this depends on the specific oscillator form. There is also no comparison to other common circadian models or any experimental anchor, which keeps the claim scoped to the simulations.

This is incremental modeling work aimed at circadian theorists who already think about network architecture and noise. It is worth sending to peer review because the observation is internally consistent and the question is well-posed, even if the advance is modest and model-bound.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports numerical simulations of a self-sustained oscillator coupled to an output network, claiming that serial pathways actively buffer period variability arising from molecular noise in the clock. The reduction depends on parameters of both the clock and output systems; in more complex networks the shortest-path length from the core oscillator is a major determinant of increased precision, with the buffering effect saturating in long cascades. The work concludes that circadian output networks contain an intrinsic precision-enhancing mechanism.

Significance. If the reported numerical observations hold under the chosen model, the result indicates that output networks are not passive relays but can improve rhythmic reliability, with a clear dependence on network architecture (path length) and parameters. This provides a concrete, falsifiable prediction about how network topology affects precision that could be tested experimentally. The explicit exploration of parameter dependence and saturation behavior is a strength of the numerical approach.

major comments (1)

[Results / Methods] The central claim that output networks buffer period variability rests entirely on numerical calculations, yet the manuscript provides neither the governing equations of the self-sustained oscillator and output network, the specific parameter values employed, nor the quantitative definition and measurement protocol for period variability. Without these details the data-to-claim link cannot be evaluated and the reported dependence on path length and saturation cannot be assessed for robustness.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states results without any equations, parameter ranges, or error metrics, which is acceptable for an abstract but compounds the lack of specificity in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and the recommendation for major revision. The single major comment identifies a critical gap in methodological transparency that prevents full evaluation of the numerical results. We address this directly below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results / Methods] The central claim that output networks buffer period variability rests entirely on numerical calculations, yet the manuscript provides neither the governing equations of the self-sustained oscillator and output network, the specific parameter values employed, nor the quantitative definition and measurement protocol for period variability. Without these details the data-to-claim link cannot be evaluated and the reported dependence on path length and saturation cannot be assessed for robustness.

Authors: We agree that the submitted manuscript does not provide the governing equations, parameter values, or the precise protocol for quantifying period variability. This omission limits independent assessment of the buffering effect, its parameter dependence, and the saturation with path length. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated Methods subsection containing: (i) the full set of ordinary differential equations for the core self-sustained oscillator and each node in the output network, (ii) a table listing all numerical parameter values together with their biological interpretation, and (iii) an explicit description of the period-variability metric (standard deviation and coefficient of variation of inter-peak intervals obtained from long stochastic trajectories, with details of the peak-detection algorithm and number of realizations). These additions will make the numerical protocol fully reproducible and allow direct evaluation of the reported architecture-dependent precision enhancement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper reports observations from numerical simulations of a self-sustained oscillator coupled to output networks. No analytical derivation chain, first-principles predictions, or fitted parameters renamed as outputs are claimed or present. All results are internal to the chosen model and simulation protocol, with no reduction of any quantity to its inputs by construction or self-citation load-bearing steps. This is the expected non-finding for a purely computational study without mathematical claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes an unspecified self-sustained oscillator model and output network whose parameters control the observed buffering; these constitute free parameters whose values are not justified by independent evidence.

free parameters (1)

clock and output system parameters
The extent of period reduction is stated to depend on these parameters, implying they are selected or fitted within the simulations.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The numerical model of the coupled oscillator and output network captures the relevant noise and dynamics of cellular circadian systems
This modeling choice is required for the numerical observations to be interpreted as biologically meaningful.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5684 in / 1158 out tokens · 31066 ms · 2026-06-26T06:10:37.509066+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[1]

Fundamental properties of circadian rhythms

Johnson C, Elliott J, Foster R, Honma K, Kronauer R. Fundamental properties of circadian rhythms. In: Dunlap J, Loros J, DeCoursey P, editors. Chronobiology: biological timekeeping. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 2004. p. 67–105

2004
[2]

Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells

Nagoshi E, Saini C, Bauer C, Laroche T, Naef F, Schibler U. Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells. Cell. 2004;119(5):693–705. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.015

work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.015 2004
[3]

Resilient circadian oscillator revealed in individual cyanobacteria

Mihalcescu I, Hsing W, Leibler S. Resilient circadian oscillator revealed in individual cyanobacteria. Nature. 2004;430(6995):81–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02533

work page doi:10.1038/nature02533 2004
[4]

Adaptive diversification in the cellular circadian behavior of Arabidopsis leaf-and root-derived cells

Nakamura S, Oyama T. Adaptive diversification in the cellular circadian behavior of Arabidopsis leaf-and root-derived cells. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2022;63(3):421–432. doi:10.1101/2021.06.10.447857

work page doi:10.1101/2021.06.10.447857 2022
[5]

Robustness of circadian rhythms with respect to molecular noise

Gonze D, Halloy J, Goldbeter A. Robustness of circadian rhythms with respect to molecular noise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99(2):673–678. doi:10.1073/pnas.022628299

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.022628299 2002
[6]

Transcription fluctuation effects on biochemical oscillations

Nishino R, Sakaue T, Nakanishi H. Transcription fluctuation effects on biochemical oscillations. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60938. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060938

work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060938 2013
[7]

Cut the noise or couple up: Coordinating circadian and synthetic clocks

Micklem CN, Locke JC. Cut the noise or couple up: Coordinating circadian and synthetic clocks. iScience. 2021;24(9). doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103051

work page doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103051 2021
[8]

Stochastic gene expression out-of-steady-state in the cyanobacterial circadian clock

Chabot JR, Pedraza JM, Luitel P, Van Oudenaarden A. Stochastic gene expression out-of-steady-state in the cyanobacterial circadian clock. Nature. 2007;450(7173):1249–1252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06395

work page doi:10.1038/nature06395 2007
[9]

Coordination of robust single cell rhythms in the Arabidopsis circadian clock via spatial waves of gene expression

Gould PD, Domijan M, Greenwood M, Tokuda IT, Rees H, Kozma-Bognar L, et al. Coordination of robust single cell rhythms in the Arabidopsis circadian clock via spatial waves of gene expression. Elife. 2018;7:e31700. doi:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31700

work page doi:10.7554/elife.31700 2018
[10]

Noise-driven cellular heterogeneity in circadian periodicity

Li Y, Shan Y, Desai RV, Cox KH, Weinberger LS, Takahashi JS. Noise-driven cellular heterogeneity in circadian periodicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020;117(19):10350–10356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922388117

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1922388117 2020
[11]

Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation

Becskei A, Serrano L. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature. 2000;405(6786):590–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/35014651

work page doi:10.1038/35014651 2000
[12]

Noise in transcription negative feedback loops: simulation and experimental analysis

Dublanche Y, Michalodimitrakis K, K¨ ummerer N, Foglierini M, Serrano L. Noise in transcription negative feedback loops: simulation and experimental analysis. Molecular Systems Biology. 2006;2(1):MSB4100081. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100081

work page doi:10.1038/msb4100081 2006
[13]

Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture

Chalancon G, Ravarani CN, Balaji S, Martinez-Arias A, Aravind L, Jothi R, et al. Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture. Trends in Genetics. 2012;28(5):221–232. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.01.006. June 23, 2026 11/20

work page doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.01.006 2012
[14]

Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif

Mangan S, Alon U. Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100(21):11980–11985. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2133841100

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2133841100 2003
[15]

Structure of cell networks critically determines oscillation regularity

Kori H, Kawamura Y, Masuda N. Structure of cell networks critically determines oscillation regularity. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2012;297:61–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.007

work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.007 2012
[16]

Period variability of coupled noisy oscillators

Mori F, Kori H. Period variability of coupled noisy oscillators. Physical Review E. 2013;87(3):030901. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.030901

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.87.030901 2013
[17]

Noninvasive inference methods for interaction and noise intensities of coupled oscillators using only spike time data

Mori F, Kori H. Noninvasive inference methods for interaction and noise intensities of coupled oscillators using only spike time data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119(6):e2113620119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211362011

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.211362011 2022
[18]

Precision of collective oscillations in complex dynamical systems with noise

Mori F, Mikhailov AS. Precision of collective oscillations in complex dynamical systems with noise. Physical Review E. 2016;93(6):062206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062206

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.93.062206 2016
[19]

Enhanced precision of circadian rhythm by output system

Kaji H, Mori F, Ito H. Enhanced precision of circadian rhythm by output system. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2023;574:111621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111621

work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111621 2023
[20]

Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes

Goodwin BC. Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes. Advances in Enzyme Regulation. 1965;3:425–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0065-2571(65)90067-1

work page doi:10.1016/0065-2571(65)90067-1 1965
[21]

Comparative study of circadian clock models, in search of processes promoting oscillation

Kurosawa G, Mochizuki A, Iwasa Y. Comparative study of circadian clock models, in search of processes promoting oscillation. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2002;216(2):193–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.2546

work page doi:10.1006/jtbi.2002.2546 2002
[22]

Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields

Guckenheimer J, Holmes P. Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013

2013
[23]

Sinusoidal regulation reduces circadian period variability

Kaji H, Mori F, Maruyama O, Ito H. Sinusoidal regulation reduces circadian period variability. Scientific reports. 2025;15(1):33843. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04614-z

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-025-04614-z 2025
[24]

The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks

Dibner C, Schibler U, Albrecht U. The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks. Annual Review of Physiology. 2010;72(1):517–549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135821

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135821 2010
[25]

Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals

Mohawk JA, Green CB, Takahashi JS. Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2012;35:445–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153128

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153128 2012
[26]

Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock

Takahashi JS. Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2017;18(3):164–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.150

work page doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.150 2017
[27]

Adrenal peripheral clock controls the autonomous circadian rhythm of glucocorticoid by causing rhythmic steroid production

Son GH, Chung S, Choe HK, Kim HD, Baik SM, Lee H, et al. Adrenal peripheral clock controls the autonomous circadian rhythm of glucocorticoid by causing rhythmic steroid production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(52):20970–20975. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806962105. June 23, 2026 12/20

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0806962105 2008
[28]

Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by REV-ERB-αand REV-ERB-β

Cho HK, Zhao X, Hatori M, Yu RT, Barish GD, Lam MTY, et al. Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by REV-ERB-αand REV-ERB-β. Nature. 2012;485:123–127. doi:10.1038/nature11048

work page doi:10.1038/nature11048 2012
[29]

Circadian Control of Global Gene Expression by the Cyanobacterial Master Regulator RpaA

Markson JS, Piechura JR, Puszynska AM, O’Shea EK. Circadian Control of Global Gene Expression by the Cyanobacterial Master Regulator RpaA. Cell. 2013;155(6):1396–1408. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.005

work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.005 2013
[30]

Low temperature nullifies the circadian clock in cyanobacteria through Hopf bifurcation

Murayama Y, Kori H, Oshima C, Kondo T, Iwasaki H, Ito H. Low temperature nullifies the circadian clock in cyanobacteria through Hopf bifurcation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(22):5641–5646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620378114

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1620378114 2017
[31]

Low temperature abolishes human cellular circadian rhythm through Hopf bifurcation

Xiao Y, Sainoo Y, Nishimura T, Ito H. Low temperature abolishes human cellular circadian rhythm through Hopf bifurcation. npj Systems Biology and Applications. 2025;12(1):5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-025-00628-5

work page doi:10.1038/s41540-025-00628-5 2025
[32]

Biomolecular Feedback Systems

Vecchio DD, Murray RM. Biomolecular Feedback Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2014. June 23, 2026 13/20 Fig 1 Clock Noise Degradation A B y1 y2 y3 w y1 y2 y3 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 200190 210 CV = 3.12 % CV = 3.03 % CV = 2.89 % CV = 2.95 % Time 0.22 0.17 0.29 100 102101 FitzHugh-Nagumo 0.16 0.14 0.18 100 102101 Phase model 100 102 K 10...

2014

[1] [1]

Fundamental properties of circadian rhythms

Johnson C, Elliott J, Foster R, Honma K, Kronauer R. Fundamental properties of circadian rhythms. In: Dunlap J, Loros J, DeCoursey P, editors. Chronobiology: biological timekeeping. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 2004. p. 67–105

2004

[2] [2]

Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells

Nagoshi E, Saini C, Bauer C, Laroche T, Naef F, Schibler U. Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells. Cell. 2004;119(5):693–705. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.015

work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.015 2004

[3] [3]

Resilient circadian oscillator revealed in individual cyanobacteria

Mihalcescu I, Hsing W, Leibler S. Resilient circadian oscillator revealed in individual cyanobacteria. Nature. 2004;430(6995):81–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02533

work page doi:10.1038/nature02533 2004

[4] [4]

Adaptive diversification in the cellular circadian behavior of Arabidopsis leaf-and root-derived cells

Nakamura S, Oyama T. Adaptive diversification in the cellular circadian behavior of Arabidopsis leaf-and root-derived cells. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2022;63(3):421–432. doi:10.1101/2021.06.10.447857

work page doi:10.1101/2021.06.10.447857 2022

[5] [5]

Robustness of circadian rhythms with respect to molecular noise

Gonze D, Halloy J, Goldbeter A. Robustness of circadian rhythms with respect to molecular noise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99(2):673–678. doi:10.1073/pnas.022628299

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.022628299 2002

[6] [6]

Transcription fluctuation effects on biochemical oscillations

Nishino R, Sakaue T, Nakanishi H. Transcription fluctuation effects on biochemical oscillations. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60938. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060938

work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060938 2013

[7] [7]

Cut the noise or couple up: Coordinating circadian and synthetic clocks

Micklem CN, Locke JC. Cut the noise or couple up: Coordinating circadian and synthetic clocks. iScience. 2021;24(9). doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103051

work page doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103051 2021

[8] [8]

Stochastic gene expression out-of-steady-state in the cyanobacterial circadian clock

Chabot JR, Pedraza JM, Luitel P, Van Oudenaarden A. Stochastic gene expression out-of-steady-state in the cyanobacterial circadian clock. Nature. 2007;450(7173):1249–1252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06395

work page doi:10.1038/nature06395 2007

[9] [9]

Coordination of robust single cell rhythms in the Arabidopsis circadian clock via spatial waves of gene expression

Gould PD, Domijan M, Greenwood M, Tokuda IT, Rees H, Kozma-Bognar L, et al. Coordination of robust single cell rhythms in the Arabidopsis circadian clock via spatial waves of gene expression. Elife. 2018;7:e31700. doi:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31700

work page doi:10.7554/elife.31700 2018

[10] [10]

Noise-driven cellular heterogeneity in circadian periodicity

Li Y, Shan Y, Desai RV, Cox KH, Weinberger LS, Takahashi JS. Noise-driven cellular heterogeneity in circadian periodicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020;117(19):10350–10356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922388117

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1922388117 2020

[11] [11]

Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation

Becskei A, Serrano L. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature. 2000;405(6786):590–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/35014651

work page doi:10.1038/35014651 2000

[12] [12]

Noise in transcription negative feedback loops: simulation and experimental analysis

Dublanche Y, Michalodimitrakis K, K¨ ummerer N, Foglierini M, Serrano L. Noise in transcription negative feedback loops: simulation and experimental analysis. Molecular Systems Biology. 2006;2(1):MSB4100081. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100081

work page doi:10.1038/msb4100081 2006

[13] [13]

Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture

Chalancon G, Ravarani CN, Balaji S, Martinez-Arias A, Aravind L, Jothi R, et al. Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture. Trends in Genetics. 2012;28(5):221–232. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.01.006. June 23, 2026 11/20

work page doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.01.006 2012

[14] [14]

Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif

Mangan S, Alon U. Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100(21):11980–11985. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2133841100

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2133841100 2003

[15] [15]

Structure of cell networks critically determines oscillation regularity

Kori H, Kawamura Y, Masuda N. Structure of cell networks critically determines oscillation regularity. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2012;297:61–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.007

work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.007 2012

[16] [16]

Period variability of coupled noisy oscillators

Mori F, Kori H. Period variability of coupled noisy oscillators. Physical Review E. 2013;87(3):030901. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.030901

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.87.030901 2013

[17] [17]

Noninvasive inference methods for interaction and noise intensities of coupled oscillators using only spike time data

Mori F, Kori H. Noninvasive inference methods for interaction and noise intensities of coupled oscillators using only spike time data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119(6):e2113620119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211362011

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.211362011 2022

[18] [18]

Precision of collective oscillations in complex dynamical systems with noise

Mori F, Mikhailov AS. Precision of collective oscillations in complex dynamical systems with noise. Physical Review E. 2016;93(6):062206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062206

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.93.062206 2016

[19] [19]

Enhanced precision of circadian rhythm by output system

Kaji H, Mori F, Ito H. Enhanced precision of circadian rhythm by output system. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2023;574:111621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111621

work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111621 2023

[20] [20]

Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes

Goodwin BC. Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes. Advances in Enzyme Regulation. 1965;3:425–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0065-2571(65)90067-1

work page doi:10.1016/0065-2571(65)90067-1 1965

[21] [21]

Comparative study of circadian clock models, in search of processes promoting oscillation

Kurosawa G, Mochizuki A, Iwasa Y. Comparative study of circadian clock models, in search of processes promoting oscillation. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2002;216(2):193–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.2546

work page doi:10.1006/jtbi.2002.2546 2002

[22] [22]

Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields

Guckenheimer J, Holmes P. Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013

2013

[23] [23]

Sinusoidal regulation reduces circadian period variability

Kaji H, Mori F, Maruyama O, Ito H. Sinusoidal regulation reduces circadian period variability. Scientific reports. 2025;15(1):33843. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04614-z

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-025-04614-z 2025

[24] [24]

The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks

Dibner C, Schibler U, Albrecht U. The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks. Annual Review of Physiology. 2010;72(1):517–549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135821

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135821 2010

[25] [25]

Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals

Mohawk JA, Green CB, Takahashi JS. Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2012;35:445–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153128

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153128 2012

[26] [26]

Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock

Takahashi JS. Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2017;18(3):164–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.150

work page doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.150 2017

[27] [27]

Adrenal peripheral clock controls the autonomous circadian rhythm of glucocorticoid by causing rhythmic steroid production

Son GH, Chung S, Choe HK, Kim HD, Baik SM, Lee H, et al. Adrenal peripheral clock controls the autonomous circadian rhythm of glucocorticoid by causing rhythmic steroid production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(52):20970–20975. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806962105. June 23, 2026 12/20

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0806962105 2008

[28] [28]

Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by REV-ERB-αand REV-ERB-β

Cho HK, Zhao X, Hatori M, Yu RT, Barish GD, Lam MTY, et al. Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by REV-ERB-αand REV-ERB-β. Nature. 2012;485:123–127. doi:10.1038/nature11048

work page doi:10.1038/nature11048 2012

[29] [29]

Circadian Control of Global Gene Expression by the Cyanobacterial Master Regulator RpaA

Markson JS, Piechura JR, Puszynska AM, O’Shea EK. Circadian Control of Global Gene Expression by the Cyanobacterial Master Regulator RpaA. Cell. 2013;155(6):1396–1408. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.005

work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.005 2013

[30] [30]

Low temperature nullifies the circadian clock in cyanobacteria through Hopf bifurcation

Murayama Y, Kori H, Oshima C, Kondo T, Iwasaki H, Ito H. Low temperature nullifies the circadian clock in cyanobacteria through Hopf bifurcation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(22):5641–5646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620378114

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1620378114 2017

[31] [31]

Low temperature abolishes human cellular circadian rhythm through Hopf bifurcation

Xiao Y, Sainoo Y, Nishimura T, Ito H. Low temperature abolishes human cellular circadian rhythm through Hopf bifurcation. npj Systems Biology and Applications. 2025;12(1):5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-025-00628-5

work page doi:10.1038/s41540-025-00628-5 2025

[32] [32]

Biomolecular Feedback Systems

Vecchio DD, Murray RM. Biomolecular Feedback Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2014. June 23, 2026 13/20 Fig 1 Clock Noise Degradation A B y1 y2 y3 w y1 y2 y3 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 200190 210 CV = 3.12 % CV = 3.03 % CV = 2.89 % CV = 2.95 % Time 0.22 0.17 0.29 100 102101 FitzHugh-Nagumo 0.16 0.14 0.18 100 102101 Phase model 100 102 K 10...

2014