Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Focused axisymmetric spatially chirped beams

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Focused radially chirped beams sweep their intensity peak along the focus at tunable sub- and super-luminal speeds, and small arrays of 1D chirped beams can mimic their focal structure.

desk verdict A solid, genuinely new characterization of radially chirped beams whose multi-beam mimicry conclusion overshoots the single demonstrated case. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24817 v1 pith:BQNR2X64 submitted 2025-05-30 physics.optics

Eric C. Nelson , Kyle J. Charbonnet , Haytham H. Effarah , Trevor Reutershan , Kyle D. Chesnut , Christopher P. J. Barty This is my paper
classification physics.optics PACS 42.25.Bs42.25.Fx42.25.Ja
keywords radialspatialchirppulsefronttiltspace-timefocusingultrashortpulsesvectorbeamscoherentbeamcombiningconcentricringgratingscentroidvelocity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper characterizes what happens when a beam with radial spatial chirp—a spectrum mapped onto the beam as a function of radius instead of across one transverse axis—is focused. It reports that the focus develops a symmetric conical pulse front, transverse intensity fringes, and a peak-intensity centroid whose on-axis sweep velocity can be tuned from sub-luminal to super-luminal by changing the chirp strength, the off-axis radius $\delta_r$, and the $f$-number of the focusing optic. Because ideal radial chirp normally requires custom concentric ring gratings and transmissive optics, the paper's central practical claim is that coherent arrays of four or twelve ordinary one-dimensional spatially chirped beams can reproduce the primary space-time and polarization structure of the ideal beam; in the configuration shown, four beams reach 77% of the ideal focal peak intensity. A sympathetic reader would care because this opens a route to space-time-shaped, vector, high-energy pulses using existing high-damage-threshold grating technology.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identities are Eq. (2), $\tan\theta_{\mathrm{tilt}} = \tan\theta_a + \tan\theta_{\mathrm{PFT}}$, which combines the geometric tilt from focusing the annular field with the chirp-induced pulse-front tilt; and Eq. (8), which converts that combined tilt into the on-axis centroid sweep velocity at the focus. Around these, Eq. (5) gives the transverse fringe spacing as the two-plane-wave interference value $\Lambda = \lambda_0/(2\sin\theta_a)$, and Eq. (6) gives the temporal-focusing shortening of the local pulse duration near the focus. The numerical engine is vectorial Rayleigh-Sommerfeld propagation computed with the Bluestein method, which propagates spatio-spectral fields to arbitrary planes without paraxial assumptions. The multi-beam approximation replaces the continuous radial chirp with $N$ discrete 1D chirped beams oriented like chords of the annulus, each carrying $1/N$ of the energy and, in the four-beam case, expanded in radius to fill the input aperture.

What would settle it

Build a four-beam array from conventional grating compressors with matched offset, chirp, orientation, and phase, focus it, and measure $(x,t)$ intensity slices and the on-axis centroid velocity through the focus for several values of $\bar{\beta}$ and $\delta_r$; compare these against the simulated radial chirp. If the array's centroid-velocity curve or pulse-front cone deviates from the radial case as the parameters vary, or if coherent-combining phase errors distort the spot beyond the stated tolerance, the mimicry claim fails. A direct check is to repeat the paper's Fig. 10 comparison at $\bar{\beta}=10$ or $\delta_r=2$ cm: the approximation should retain the symmetric focal spot if the claim generalizes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the axisymmetric extension of one-dimensional spatial chirp turns the tilted pulse front of conventional simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing into a symmetric pulse-front cone. The focal field is governed by the tilt identity $\tan\theta_{\mathrm{tilt}} = \tan\theta_a + \tan\theta_{\mathrm{PFT}}$, where $\theta_a$ is the geometric tilt from focusing the off-axis annular field and $\theta_{\mathrm{PFT}}$ is the chirp-induced pulse-front tilt; it shows an x-shaped $(x,t)$ cross section whose transverse fringe spacing follows $\Lambda = \lambda_0/(2\sin\theta_a)$, and an on-axis centroid velocity at focus given by Eq. (8) that can be made sub-luminal or super-luminal. The sign of the spatial chirp controls whether the pulse-front tilt adds to or cancels the geometric tilt, and at pulse-front-tilt matching the apparent cone angle reaches $90^\circ$. Because the annular field is naturally suited to vector polarization, radial polarization enhances the longitudinal field at focus while azimuthal polarization suppresses it. The paper further argues that these properties survive in a practical approximation: four equally spaced, coherently combined 1D chirped beams with expanded input radius and equal energy produce a radially symmetric focal spot with 77% of the ideal radial beam's peak intensity (twelve beams give 48%), while using conventional high-efficiency gratings and allowing independent control of offset, chirp, and polarization.

Load-bearing premise

The practical conclusion rests on the assumption that a few coherently combined one-dimensional chirped beams reproduce not just the focal-plane intensity but the full space-time, propagation, and polarization behavior of the ideal radial chirp; the paper demonstrates this match at one setting ($\bar{\beta}=5$, $\delta_r=0.5$ cm) and only for the $t=0$ focal-plane transverse intensity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Tunable sub- and super-luminal on-axis sweep speeds become a design parameter: choosing grating separation, groove density, and focusing $f$-number sets the focal-plane centroid velocity through Eq. (8).
  • Radial chirp produces a symmetric conical pulse front, so non-reciprocal pulse-front-tilt-dependent effects that occur with 1D chirp should be symmetrized in laser-material interactions.
  • Radial and azimuthal polarization states give focal volumes with enhanced or suppressed longitudinal field, offering control over sub-diffraction-limited spots and the field polarization at focus.
  • Coherent arrays of four 1D chirped beams can reproduce the main focal properties of radial chirp using conventional high-damage-threshold gratings, with independent control of offset, chirp sign, orientation, and polarization; the demonstrated four-beam case reaches 77% of the ideal peak intensity.
  • Independently controlling chirp strength and offset (rather than coupling them through a single grating pair) allows shaping of the focal cone angle, fringe visibility, and temporal focusing, including a pulse-front-tilt-matching regime with a $90^\circ$ apparent cone angle.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A likely practical extension is optimizing the number of beams and the expansion ratio: the paper's single demonstration suggests a trade-off between peak intensity (better with fewer, larger beams) and azimuthal fidelity (better with more beams), and a systematic sweep over $\bar{\beta}$ and $\delta_r$ would map where the approximation holds.
  • Because the scheme relies on coherent combining, alignment and phase-locking tolerances—piston, tip, and tilt errors between beam lines—are the likeliest failure mode in a real high-energy system; the paper does not quantify this sensitivity, so a tolerance study is a natural next check.
  • Equation (8) gives a direct design recipe: one could choose an $f$-number and pulse-front-tilt angle to hit a specified centroid speed, enabling velocity-tunable laser-driven interactions without custom annular optics.
  • The tunable symmetric pulse-front cone could also serve as a testbed for space-time wave packets, since independent control of $\bar{\beta}$ and $\delta_r$ spans nearly planar to strongly conical space-time topologies; the paper does not explore that regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies focused radially chirped, axisymmetric spatially chirped beams. Using vectorial Rayleigh-Sommerfeld propagation, the authors characterize focal-plane (x,t) intensity patterns, fringe spacing, pulse-front tilt, on-axis centroid velocity, and the effect of linear, radial, and azimuthal polarization. They then propose approximating the radial chirp with coherent arrays of 1D spatially chirped beams, showing for one configuration that a four-beam array reaches 77% of the peak focal intensity of the ideal radial beam. The central claims are tunable superluminal/sub-luminal centroid velocity, symmetric pulse-front tilt, and the feasibility of multi-beam mimicry.

Significance. The paper provides a systematic simulation-based characterization of focused radially chirped beams, covering negative/positive chirp, polarization states, and centroid-velocity tuning. The use of physically motivated grating-generated fields and vectorial Rayleigh-Sommerfeld propagation is a strength, and the analytic trends for fringe spacing (Eq. 5) and pulse-duration scaling (Eq. 6) match cited prior results. The proposed multi-beam approximation, if validated, would offer a practical route to high-intensity radially chirped beams using conventional gratings. However, the current evidence for the approximation is limited to one configuration and one intensity plane, so the practical claim is not yet fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.1 and Fig. 10] The central practical conclusion stated in the Abstract and Sec. 4 — that arrays of 1D spatially chirped beams 'maintain all the properties' of radially chirped beams — is not supported by the evidence presented. The only comparison shown is a single configuration (β_BAR = 5, δr = 0.5 cm) and a single observable: the t = 0 focal-plane intensity. No comparison is shown for the on-axis centroid velocity of Eq. (8), the symmetric pulse-front tilt/conical structure during propagation, the transverse intensity modulations at other times or planes, or the vector polarization composition (E_z vs. E_x, E_y). Because the authors explicitly state that parameter exploration is outside the scope of this manuscript, the demonstrated case cannot justify the general claim. I recommend either adding these comparisons for a representative set of parameters or substantially qualifying the conclusion.
  2. [Sec. 3.1 and Fig. 10] The vector-polarization mimicry is not established. Fig. 10 uses four linearly polarized 1D chirped beams to approximate a radially polarized radially chirped beam, but four discrete linear polarization directions cannot reproduce a continuous radial polarization distribution. Consequently, the longitudinal field component, whose magnitude is a headline result for the ideal beam (Fig. 8), and the polarization-dependent focal structure will differ in a way that is not quantified. The claim that the approximation maintains 'polarization states' from the Abstract therefore needs either explicit demonstration or a clear qualification.
  3. [Sec. 3.1, Fig. 10(d-f)] The similarity between the multi-beam approximation and the radial beam is assessed only qualitatively. The intensities in Fig. 10(d-f) are normalized to the peak of the radial beam, and the text states that the twelve-beam case is 'more spatially similar' and that the four-beam case achieves 'higher peak intensities,' but no quantitative similarity metric (e.g., RMS difference, correlation, or mode overlap) is provided. This makes it difficult to judge whether the approximation is adequate for applications such as high-power focusing.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (4)] The notation β_BAR is introduced but the typesetting in the manuscript is inconsistent; please ensure all symbols render correctly in the final version.
  2. [Sec. 3, Fig. 7(a)] The definition of Λ and the exact dependence on δr and β_BAR are not clear from the figure; please state the parameters used and define the plotted quantity explicitly.
  3. [Sec. 3, Eq. (8)] The derivation of Eq. (8) is not given; please either provide a derivation or a specific citation, and define the sign convention for positive/negative spatial chirp so that superluminal/sub-luminal velocities are unambiguous.
  4. [Sec. 2] There are typographical errors, e.g., 'the the' in Sec. 2 and an apparent '0° AOI' rendering issue; a careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the paper's analytic formulas are cited from independent prior work and the simulations are self-contained; the only self-citation (Ref. 32) is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The input fields are constructed from the grating equation and standard spatially chirped-beam geometry (Section 2), then propagated with the vectorial Rayleigh-Sommerfeld convolution and Bluestein method, which are independent numerical techniques (Refs. 33-38). The analytic expressions for pulse-front-tilt angle (Eqs. 2-4), fringe spacing (Eq. 5), temporal focusing (Eq. 6), and z-dependent PFT angle (Eq. 7) are cited from prior external or independent sources (Refs. 4, 6, 41), not derived from the paper's own output. Equation 8 is presented as an analytic form for the on-axis centroid velocity and is compared with simulation in Fig. 9; nothing indicates it was fitted to those simulations. The multi-beam mimicry claim in Section 3.1 is a direct simulation comparison with equal energy partition and stated input parameters; the 48% and 77% peak-intensity values are emergent simulation results, not fitted parameters. The only self-citation is Ref. 32, used to justify grating-equation-derived chirp profiles and to explain centroid translation near focus; it is supporting context rather than the load-bearing step, and it does not by itself force any conclusion. The broader conclusion in Section 4 that the four-beam approximation 'maintains all the properties' is stronger than the single-parameter, single-observable test shown, but that is an evidence-conclusion mismatch, not circular reasoning. Under the stated rules, no circular step can be exhibited, so the circularity score is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The free parameters are representative simulation inputs chosen by hand, not fitted to a target result. The main uncharged assumptions are ideal optics, uniform grating efficiency, and ideal coherent combination in the multi-beam approximation.

free parameters (4)
  • Input beam radius w_in = 0.5 mm
    Chosen as a representative Ti:sapphire oscillator parameter; sets the Rayleigh range and appears in the PFT and sweep-velocity formulas.
  • Spectral bandwidth Delta_omega = 100 nm FWHM at 800 nm
    Chosen as a representative Ti:sapphire parameter; directly enters Eq. 4 and the sweep-velocity expression.
  • Focusing and grating geometry (focal length f, groove density, grating separation) = f = 5 cm; 500 or 700 lines/mm
    Chosen simulation geometry; controls f-number, theta_a, beta_BAR, and delta_r.
  • Aspect ratio beta_BAR and center-frequency offset delta_r = beta_BAR = 2, 5, 10; delta_r = 1, 2, 3, 4 cm across figures
    Independent tunable variables whose influence on the focal structure is characterized; they are varied by hand, not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Vectorial Rayleigh-Sommerfeld propagation with Bluestein sampling accurately models non-paraxial focused few-cycle pulses.
    Section 2 relies on this numerical method; no experimental or analytic benchmark is provided in the paper.
  • domain assumption The focusing optic is an ideal thin lens and the pulse is transform-limited after the lens.
    Section 2 states the lens is treated as an ideal phase and temporal dispersion is pre-compensated.
  • domain assumption Concentric ring gratings have uniform diffraction efficiency independent of polarization.
    Section 2 explicitly assumes uniform diffraction efficiency as a function of beam polarization.
  • domain assumption Analytic SSTF formulas for PFT and centroid velocity (Eqs. 4-8) remain valid for radially chirped, vectorially polarized pulses.
    The paper imports 1D SSTF results from Refs. 4, 6, and 32 without re-deriving them for the axisymmetric vector case.
  • domain assumption Coherent combination of N beams with matched orientation, delta_r, beta_BAR, and polarization reproduces the ideal radial chirp without phase or alignment errors.
    Section 3.1 simulates ideal superposition; practical coherence and alignment tolerances are not analyzed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Focused axisymmetric spatially chirped beams." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQNR2X64

@misc{pith2026250524817,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Focused axisymmetric spatially chirped beams},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQNR2X64}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24817}
}
read the original abstract

A characterization of the focused space-time structures of radially chirped beams is provided, detailing different tunable properties such as: variable on-axis centroid velocity, symmetric pulse front tilt, transverse intensity modulations, and polarization states. While the practical generation of ideal radially chirped beams and polarizations can be problematic, it is shown that the primary characteristics of these beams can be mimicked with simple arrays of axisymmetric, 1D spatially chirped beams.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24817 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The various spatial chirp patterns and polarization orientations for (a),(b) 1D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A single pass, concentric ring grating pair used to generate radial spatial chirp. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic of different focusing regimes depending on the sign of spatial chirp. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The propagation of a focused radially chirped beam. The negative radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (x,t) representations of the transverse intensity of the focus ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (x,t) representations of the transverse intensity of the focus ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) The spacing between fringes of the focused radially chirped beam as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The peak intensities for the transverse and longitudinal fields for linear, radial, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: The centroid velocity as a function of position from the focus of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The temporally integrated transverse (x,y) input plane of (a) a radially chirped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Spatiotemporal sculpturing of light: a tutorial,

    Q. Zhan, “Spatiotemporal sculpturing of light: a tutorial,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 16 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Optical chirped beam amplification and propagation,

    C. P . J. Barty, “Optical chirped beam amplification and propagation,” U.S. patent 6,804,045B2 (12 Oct 2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing for axial scanning,

    M. E. Durst, G. Zhu, and C. Xu, “Simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing for axial scanning,” Opt. Express 14, 12243–12254 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Intuitive analysis of space-time focusing with double-ABCD calculation,

    C. G. Durfee, M. Greco, E. Block, et al., “Intuitive analysis of space-time focusing with double-ABCD calculation,” Opt. Express 20, 14244–14259 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    On the localization of the high-intensity region of simultaneous space-time foci,

    E. Archer, B. Sun, R. Walczak, et al., “On the localization of the high-intensity region of simultaneous space-time foci,” Opt. Express 33 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Tilted snowplow electron acceleration with simultaneously spatially and temporally focused laser pulses,

    A. M. Wilhelm, “Tilted snowplow electron acceleration with simultaneously spatially and temporally focused laser pulses,” Ph.d., Colorado School of Mines (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Tilted snowplow ponderomotive electron acceleration with spatio-temporally shaped ultrafast laser pulses,

    A. M. Wilhelm and C. G. Durfee, “Tilted snowplow ponderomotive electron acceleration with spatio-temporally shaped ultrafast laser pulses,” Front. Phys. 7 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Ponderomotive snowplow electron acceleration with high energy tilted ultrafast laser pulses (preprint),

    P . Hunt, A. Wilhelm, D. Adams, et al., “Ponderomotive snowplow electron acceleration with high energy tilted ultrafast laser pulses (preprint),” Res. Sq. (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Scanningless depth-resolved microscopy,

    D. Oron, E. Tal, and Y . Silberberg, “Scanningless depth-resolved microscopy,” Opt. Express 13, 1468–1476 (2005)

    2005

  2. [10]

    Scanless two-photon excitation with temporal focusing,

    E. Papagiakoumou, E. Ronzitti, and V . Emiliani, “Scanless two-photon excitation with temporal focusing,” Nat. Methods 17, 571–581 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Spatio-temporally focused femtosecond laser pulses for nonreciprocal writing in optically transparent materials,

    D. N. Vitek, E. Block, Y . Bellouard, et al., “Spatio-temporally focused femtosecond laser pulses for nonreciprocal writing in optically transparent materials,” Opt. Express 18, 24673–24678 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Enhancing precision in fs-laser material processing by simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing,

    R. Kammel, R. Ackermann, J. Thomas, et al., “Enhancing precision in fs-laser material processing by simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing,” Light. Sci. & Appl. 3, e169–e169 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Direct writing with tilted-front femtosecond pulses,

    A. Patel, Y . Svirko, C. Durfee, and P . G. Kazansky, “Direct writing with tilted-front femtosecond pulses,” Sci. Reports 7, 12928 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Four-dimensional light shaping: manipulating ultrafast spatiotemporal foci in space and time,

    B. Sun, P . S. Salter, C. Roider, et al., “Four-dimensional light shaping: manipulating ultrafast spatiotemporal foci in space and time,” Light. Sci. & Appl. 7, 17117–17117 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Space-time wave packets localized in all dimensions,

    M. Y essenov, J. Free, Z. Chen,et al., “Space-time wave packets localized in all dimensions,” Nat. Commun. 13, 4573 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Spatio-temporal couplings in ultrashort laser pulses,

    S. Akturk, X. Gu, P . Bowlan, and R. Trebino, “Spatio-temporal couplings in ultrashort laser pulses,” J. Opt. 12, 093001 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    T wo-dimensional spatiotemporal focusing of femtosecond pulses and its applications in microscopy,

    Q. Song, A. Nakamura, K. Hirosawa, et al., “T wo-dimensional spatiotemporal focusing of femtosecond pulses and its applications in microscopy,” Rev. Sci. Instruments 86, 083701 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Integrated single grating compressor for variable pulse front tilt in simultaneously spatially and temporally focused systems,

    E. Block, J. Thomas, C. Durfee, and J. Squier, “Integrated single grating compressor for variable pulse front tilt in simultaneously spatially and temporally focused systems,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6915–6918 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Independent control of aspect ratios in the axial and lateral cross sections of a focal spot for three-dimensional femtosecond laser micromachining,

    F. He, Y . Cheng, J. Lin, et al., “Independent control of aspect ratios in the axial and lateral cross sections of a focal spot for three-dimensional femtosecond laser micromachining,” New J. Phys. 13 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Analysis of pulse front tilt in simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing,

    S. Zhang, D. Asoubar, R. Kammel, et al., “Analysis of pulse front tilt in simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31, 2437–2446 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Circular and spiral diffraction gratings,

    J. Dyson, “Circular and spiral diffraction gratings,” Proc. Royal Soc. London. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 248, 93–106 (1958)

    1958

  14. [22]

    Concentric ring metal grating for generating radially polarized light,

    Z. Ghadyani, I. Vartiainen, I. Harder, et al., “Concentric ring metal grating for generating radially polarized light,” Appl. Opt. 50, 2451–2457 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    Nonlinear space-time focusing and filamentation of annular femtosecond pulses in dielectrics,

    T. E. Lanier and J. R. Gulley, “Nonlinear space-time focusing and filamentation of annular femtosecond pulses in dielectrics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33, 292–301 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Concentric-ring-grating-induced strong terahertz near-field enhancement on a micro-tip,

    X. Zhou, X. Guo, A. Shkurinov, and Y . Zhu, “Concentric-ring-grating-induced strong terahertz near-field enhancement on a micro-tip,” J. Opt. 21, 105005 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Space–time focusing of bessel-like pulses,

    M. Clerici, D. Faccio, E. Rubino, et al., “Space–time focusing of bessel-like pulses,” Opt. Lett. 35, 3267–3269 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Spatiotemporal control of laser intensity,

    D. H. Froula, D. T urnbull, A. S. Davies, et al., “Spatiotemporal control of laser intensity,” Nat. Photonics 12, 262–265 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Use of spatiotemporal couplings and an axiparabola to control the velocity of peak intensity,

    A. Liberman, R. Lahaye, S. Smartsev, et al., “Use of spatiotemporal couplings and an axiparabola to control the velocity of peak intensity,” Opt Lett 49, 814–817 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Spatiotemporal optical injection,

    E. Archer, “Spatiotemporal optical injection,” Thesis, University of Oxford (2024). 29. S. Jolly and M. Porras, “Analytical fields of an ultrashort, radially polarized laser with spatial chirp,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (2024)

    2024

  21. [30]

    Realization of free-space long-distance self-healing bessel beams,

    C. Vetter, R. Steinkopf, K. Bergner, et al., “Realization of free-space long-distance self-healing bessel beams,” Laser & Photonics Rev. 13 (2019)

    2019

  22. [31]

    Characteristic analysis of a refractive axicon system for optical trepanning,

    W. P . Latham, “Characteristic analysis of a refractive axicon system for optical trepanning,” Opt. Eng. 45 (2006)

    2006

  23. [32]

    Pulse front distortions in focused spatially chirped beams,

    E. C. Nelson, K. D. Chesnut, T. Reutershan, et al., “Pulse front distortions in focused spatially chirped beams,” Opt. Continuum 3, 1051–1060 (2024)

    2024

  24. [33]

    Optics. lectures on theoretical physics, vol. iv,

    A. Sommerfeld and K. W. Meissner, “Optics. lectures on theoretical physics, vol. iv,” Am. J. Phys. 23, 477–478 (1955)

    1955

  25. [34]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999), 7th ed

    1999

  26. [35]

    J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1988)

    1988

  27. [36]

    D. G. Voelz, Computational Fourier Optics: A MATLAB Tutorial (SPIE, 2011)

    2011

  28. [37]

    Efficient full-path optical calculation of scalar and vector diffraction using the bluestein method,

    Y . Hu, Z. Wang, X. Wang, et al., “Efficient full-path optical calculation of scalar and vector diffraction using the bluestein method,” Light Sci Appl 9, 119 (2020)

    2020

  29. [38]

    A linear filtering approach to the computation of discrete fourier transform,

    L. Bluestein, “A linear filtering approach to the computation of discrete fourier transform,” IEEE Trans. on Audio Electroacoustics 18, 451–455 (1970)

    1970

  30. [39]

    SSTF-symmetric,

    E. C. Nelson, “SSTF-symmetric,” figshare (2025) , https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare. 29175305

    2025 doi

  31. [40]

    Application of space-time structured light to controlled high-intensity laser matter interactions in point and line target geometries,

    A. K. Meier, “Application of space-time structured light to controlled high-intensity laser matter interactions in point and line target geometries,” Thesis, Colorado School of Mines (2015)

    2015

  32. [41]

    Interference patterns of two focused gaussian beams in an LDA measuring volume,

    E. Li, K. Tieu, and M. Mackenzie, “Interference patterns of two focused gaussian beams in an LDA measuring volume,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 27, 395–407 (1997)

    1997

  33. [42]

    Sub-wavelength focal spot with long depth of focus generated by radially polarized, narrow-width annular beam,

    K. Kitamura, K. Sakai, and S. Noda, “Sub-wavelength focal spot with long depth of focus generated by radially polarized, narrow-width annular beam,” Opt. Express 18, 4518–4525 (2010)

    2010

  34. [43]

    Minimized spot of annular radially polarized focusing beam,

    L. Y ang, X. Xie, S. Wang, and J. Zhou, “Minimized spot of annular radially polarized focusing beam,” Opt. Lett. 38, 1331–1333 (2013)

    2013

  35. [44]

    Couairon, D

    A. Couairon, D. Faccio, and P . Di Trapani, Conical Waves, Filaments and Nonlinear Filamentation Optics (Aracne, 2007). Focused axisymmetric spatially chirped beams: supplemental document Fig. S1. (x,t) representations of the total intensity ( E2x + E2y + E2z ) of the focus ( ...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.