Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 67 references

Coexistence and manipulation of multiple singularities in a reconfigurable non-Hermitian metasurface

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mirror trick lets one metasurface host multiple non-Hermitian singularities

desk verdict Mirror-coupled metasurface achieves genuine multi-singularity coexistence; robustness claim for hybrid sensing is under-supported read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07402 v1 pith:BQPOLEV3 submitted 2026-07-08 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Xintong Shi , Yanjie Wu , Rui Zhou , Zuxing Lu , Tengyu Li , Tingting Liu , Hai Lin , Qiegen Liu
show 1 more author
Shuyuan Xiao
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph PACS 42.25.Bs78.67.Pt03.65.Yz
keywords non-HermitianexceptionalpointreflectionzerometasurfacemirrorcouplingPINdiodesensingabsorber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a metallic mirror placed beneath a pair of coupled resonators creates image resonators, effectively doubling the system's degrees of freedom without adding physical components. That extra parameter space allows an exceptional point (a non-Hermitian degeneracy where eigenvalues and eigenstates merge) and several reflection zeros (points of zero reflectance) to coexist and be independently tuned within a single electrically reconfigurable metasurface. The authors demonstrate two applications: coordinating multiple reflection zeros for broadband absorption exceeding 99.9% across the X-band, and coupling a reflection zero with the exceptional point to form a hybrid singularity that retains the exceptional point's power-law sensing sensitivity while reducing the fluctuations that normally plague exceptional-point sensors.

What carries the argument

Mirror-coupled metasurface with PIN diode reconfiguration; 4x4 effective Hamiltonian from physical and image resonators; hybrid singularity S2 (reflection zero coupled to EP); reflection zeros S1 and S4; exceptional point S3.

What would settle it

Fabricate and independently test the hybrid singularity S2 sensor under controlled environmental noise (temperature drift, humidity, fabrication variance) and measure whether its sensitivity and stability simultaneously exceed those of an isolated EP sensor under identical conditions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central object is a mirror-coupled metasurface architecture in which a metallic plane induces electromagnetic image resonators, mapping a two-dimensional physical structure into a four-resonator effective Hamiltonian. This quasi-high-dimensional parameter space removes the parameter competition that normally prevents multiple non-Hermitian singularities from coexisting in a single planar device. Within this expanded space, the authors identify a hybrid singularity (labeled S2) formed when a reflection zero sits in close spectral proximity to an exceptional point. They claim this hybrid inherits power-law sensitivity from the exceptional point while gaining the stability of a reflection零,

Load-bearing premise

The evidence that the hybrid singularity S2 resolves the sensitivity-stability trade-off comes from simulation data: EP fluctuations are attributed to mesh discretization artifacts while S2 shows smoother spectral fringes, and the experimental sensing validation with real samples appears only in supplementary material not available in the main text.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the hybrid singularity genuinely resolves the sensitivity-stability trade-off, EP-based sensors could move from laboratory demonstrations to practical field-deployable devices that use simple peak-frequency readout instead of complex eigenvalue fitting.
  • The mirror-coupled degree-of-freedom multiplication strategy could be transferred to optical and terahertz metasurfaces by replacing PIN diodes with phase-change materials or doped semiconductors, enabling multi-singularity control in other frequency bands.
  • Coordinated reflection zeros could serve as a design principle for broadband absorbers and radar-cross-section reducers that are electrically switchable between reflection and absorption states.
  • The approach of using image resonators to lift parameter competition may generalize to other non-Hermitian platforms such as electronic circuits and photonic crystals where multi-singularity engineering is currently constrained.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the image-resonator coupling strengths (kappa_11, kappa_22) can be independently controlled by adjusting mirror spacing, the architecture may allow systematic tuning of the topological braiding structure of singularities, not just their coexistence.
  • The claim that S2 resolves the sensitivity-stability trade-off rests on numerical evidence where EP fluctuations are attributed to mesh discretization artifacts; a direct analytical or experimental noise model would be needed to confirm the mechanism is physical rather than a numerical coincidence.
  • The hybrid singularity's behavior may depend sensitively on the exact spectral distance between the reflection zero and the EP, raising the question of whether there is an optimal coupling distance that the paper does not explicitly characterize.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a mirror-coupled metasurface design that maps a 2D physical structure into a 4×4 coupled-mode Hamiltonian, enabling the coexistence of an exceptional point (EP) and multiple reflection zeros within a single reconfigurable device. By introducing a metallic backplane, image resonators are induced, multiplying the system's degrees of freedom without additional physical resonators. The platform is implemented with PIN diodes for post-fabrication electrical tuning. Two applications are demonstrated: (1) broadband tunable absorption exceeding 99.9% across the X-band by spectrally coordinating multiple reflection zeros, and (2) enhanced sensing via a 'hybrid singularity' (S2) formed by coupling a reflection zero with the EP, which is claimed to inherit the EP's power-law sensitivity while improving robustness. Full-wave simulations and microwave experiments show qualitative agreement for singularity positions and spectral evolution.

Significance. The mirror-coupled architecture is an elegant and potentially generalizable approach to circumventing parameter competition among non-Hermitian singularities in metasurfaces. The experimental demonstration of coexisting EP and reflection zeros with electrical reconfigurability is a solid technical achievement. The broadband absorption application is well-supported by both simulation and experiment. The concept of a hybrid singularity for sensing is intriguing and, if the robustness claim is properly substantiated, would represent a meaningful contribution. The coupled-mode framework (Eqs. 1–5) is standard and self-contained, and the falsifiable sensing predictions (power-law fits with quantitative sensitivity values) are commendable.

major comments (3)
  1. §II.C, Fig. 5(d–f): The central claim that the hybrid singularity S2 'resolves the conventional trade-off between sensitivity and stability' rests on a comparison between EP fluctuations attributed to mesh discretization artifacts and the smoother grayscale fringes of S2. The manuscript itself states these EP fluctuations are 'merely weak numerical fluctuations' from 'mesh discretization artifacts introduced during the numerical sweep.' This is a numerical artifact analogy, not a controlled perturbation analysis. No quantitative robustness metric (e.g., variance of frequency shift under controlled random perturbations to geometry or material parameters) is provided for either the EP or S2. To support the trade-off resolution claim, the authors should either (a) perform a controlled perturbation study applying random fabrication-like deviations to unit-cell dimensions and comparing the EP
  2. §II.C, Fig. 5(c): The claim that S2 'inherits the power-law sensitivity of the EP' lacks formal justification. S2 is described as a reflection zero in spectral proximity to the EP, but the mechanism by which a scattering zero acquires power-law (rather than linear) scaling from a nearby eigenvalue degeneracy is not derived. The green triangle data points in Fig. 5(c) are fit to a power law, but no analytical argument connects the S2 scattering zero to the EP's square-root eigenvalue splitting. Please provide a derivation or at least a perturbative argument showing how the EP's non-analyticity transfers to the nearby reflection zero's frequency shift.
  3. §II.C: The experimental sensing validation with lake water samples (Supplementary Material 8) is referenced but not available in the main text for independent assessment. Given that the robustness claim is the central novelty of the sensing application, at least a summary figure or table from the experimental sensing study should be included in the main text, showing head-to-head experimental comparison of EP vs. S2 stability under identical perturbations. Without this, the practical viability claim is not assessable by readers of the main text.
minor comments (6)
  1. Eq. (1): The notation κ_ij uses both primed and unprimed indices, and the relationship κ'_12 = κ_12 for lossless spacers is stated in text but not reflected in the eigenvalue expressions. A brief note on when κ'_12 ≠ κ_12 (lossy spacer) and how this affects the EP condition would help clarify the notation.
  2. Fig. 1(c): The caption states that 'blue, red, and black solid curves map onto the respective surfaces,' but it is unclear which curves correspond to which eigenvalue pairs. Please specify.
  3. Fig. 5(b): The fitting curves for the EP frequency splitting and S1 frequency shift are shown, but the fitting equations and R² values are not provided in the main text. Including these, or referencing the Supplementary Material section where they appear, would strengthen the presentation.
  4. §II.C: The sensitivity values (4.25 GHz/RIU for EP, 4.08 GHz/RIU for S2) are quoted at Δn = 0.2, but the perturbation range (n = 1.0 to 1.4) is large. It would be useful to show how sensitivity varies across the full range, or at minimum clarify whether the quoted values are local or averaged sensitivities.
  5. The term 'quasi-high-dimensional parameter space' is used throughout but never precisely defined. A brief statement clarifying that the mirror doubles the effective number of coupled modes (from 2 to 4) without increasing physical resonator count would improve rigor.
  6. Reference [38] appears to be by some of the same authors. Please ensure all relevant prior work by the authors is appropriately cited and disclosed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. The referee correctly identifies that the robustness claim for the hybrid singularity S2 needs stronger quantitative support than the current numerical-artifact analogy provides, and that the power-law scaling of S2 lacks a formal analytical justification. We agree with both points and will revise accordingly. We also agree that the experimental sensing data should be summarized in the main text. Below we address each comment in detail.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §II.C, Fig. 5(d–f): The central claim that the hybrid singularity S2 'resolves the conventional trade-off between sensitivity and stability' rests on a comparison between EP fluctuations attributed to mesh discretization artifacts and the smoother grayscale fringes of S2. No quantitative robustness metric is provided. The authors should perform a controlled perturbation study.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the current manuscript does not provide a quantitative, controlled perturbation analysis for robustness. The comparison in Fig. 5(d–f) between EP fluctuations (attributed to mesh artifacts) and the smoother S2 fringes is qualitative, and the manuscript's own language ('merely weak numerical fluctuations') undermines the claim rather than supporting it. We accept this criticism. In the revised manuscript, we will add a controlled perturbation study in which random fabrication-like deviations (Gaussian-distributed perturbations to unit-cell dimensions, spacer thickness, and material parameters at realistic tolerance levels, e.g., ±20 μm for critical dimensions) are applied over multiple statistical realizations. For each realization, we will extract the frequency shift of both the isolated EP and the hybrid singularity S2, and report quantitative robustness metrics including the variance and standard deviation of frequency shifts for both cases under identical perturbation ensembles. This will provide a head-to-head, statistically meaningful comparison. We will also revise the language in §II.C to remove the reliance on mesh-artifact analogy as the primary evidence for the trade-off resolution claim, and instead ground the claim in the controlled perturbation data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §II.C, Fig. 5(c): The claim that S2 'inherits the power-law sensitivity of the EP' lacks formal justification. No analytical argument connects the S2 scattering zero to the EP's square-root eigenvalue splitting. Please provide a derivation or perturbative argument.

    Authors: The referee raises a valid and important point. The manuscript currently presents the power-law fit to the S2 frequency shift data (green triangles in Fig. 5(c)) without providing an analytical or perturbative argument connecting the reflection zero's frequency shift to the EP's square-root eigenvalue splitting. This is a gap in the theoretical justification. We will address this in the revision by adding a perturbative analysis. The key physical argument is as follows: in the mirror-coupled Hamiltonian (Eqs. 2–5), the reflection zero S2 resides in the spectral neighborhood of the EP formed by the eigenvalue pair (ω_λ1, ω_λ2). When a small external perturbation δn is introduced, the eigenvalue splitting near the EP scales as √δn due to the square-root branch point. The reflection zero frequency, being determined by the critical coupling condition (γ = 2Γ) applied to the eigenmode whose frequency is set by the EP-adjacent eigenvalue, inherits this non-analytic dependence because the reflection zero's spectral position is slaved to the eigenvalue trajectory in the vicinity of the degeneracy. We will formalize this argument using degenerate perturbation theory around the EP, showing explicitly how the non-analyticity of the eigenvalue splitting transfers to the scattering zero's frequency shift. We note, however, that a fully rigorous derivation valid at finite distance from the EP (where S2 actually operates) may require approximations, and we will be transparent about the regime of validity of the perturbative argument. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §II.C: The experimental sensing validation with lake water samples (Supplementary Material 8) is referenced but not available in the main text. At least a summary figure or table should be included showing head-to-head experimental comparison of EP vs. S2 stability under identical perturbations.

    Authors: We agree that the experimental sensing data should be accessible to readers of the main text, particularly given that the robustness claim is central to the sensing application's novelty. In the revised manuscript, we will incorporate a summary figure (or table) from the Supplementary Material 8 lake water experiments into the main text. This will include a head-to-head comparison of EP-based and S2-based sensing readouts under identical perturbation conditions (varying algae concentrations), showing the frequency tracking stability and sensitivity for both approaches. We believe this is essential for readers to independently assess the practical viability claim, and we thank the referee for flagging this omission. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Hamiltonian derivation, EP conditions, and sensing comparisons are self-contained against external theory and independent baselines.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained. The 4×4 Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) and its eigenvalues (Eqs. 2–5) follow from standard coupled-mode theory with mirror-image resonators. The EP condition ((κ₁₁−κ₁₂+ω̃₁−ω̃₂)²+4(κ₁₂+κ′₁₂)²=0) is derived directly from setting the discriminant of Eq. (4) to zero — a straightforward algebraic consequence, not a definition smuggled in. The critical coupling / reflection-zero condition (γ=2Γ) is attributed to external refs [33, 34, 57–59] (Sweeney et al., Wang et al., Liu et al.), none of which share authorship with the present paper. The sensing comparison benchmarks the hybrid singularity S2 against an independent EP baseline (4.25 vs 4.08 GHz/RIU) using the paper's own simulation data, which is a legitimate internal comparison rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The robustness claim for S2 is supported by simulation evidence (grayscale fringe continuity in Fig. 5f vs 5e) and experimental validation (Supplementary Material 8); while the skeptic correctly notes this evidence is weaker than a controlled perturbation analysis, that is a correctness/evidential concern, not circularity. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction. The one minor self-citation (ref [45], Shi et al., which shares several authors) is not load-bearing for the central theoretical framework — it references prior experimental work on terahertz sensing metasurfaces, not a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that the present derivation depends on. Score 1 reflects this minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces one new conceptual entity (hybrid singularity S2) with partial independent evidence. Free parameters are coupling strengths and geometric dimensions, all described as optimized but not numerically specified in the main text. Axioms are standard electromagnetic and coupled-mode theory assumptions. The main concern is that coupling parameters are not reported, making quantitative reproduction difficult.

free parameters (5)
  • κ11 (mirror self-coupling) = Not specified; described as optimized
    Coupling strength between physical resonator 1 and its image, used in Eqs. 2-5. Numerical value not stated.
  • κ22 (mirror self-coupling) = Not specified; described as optimized
    Coupling strength between physical resonator 2 and its image. Numerical value not stated.
  • κ12 (physical resonator coupling) = Not specified; described as optimized
    Coupling between the two physical resonators. Numerical value not stated.
  • κ'12 (image resonator coupling) = Equal to κ12 if spacer is lossfree
    Coupling between image resonators. Stated as equal to κ12 under lossfree assumption.
  • Unit-cell geometric dimensions = Px=Py=11mm, Lp=5.35mm, Wp=2mm, WC=0.7mm, G=0.2mm, Tc=0.5mm, L1,2,3=1.8,1.2,0.68mm, LWs=0.15mm, spacer=11mm
    Structural parameters obtained through optimization to achieve singularity coexistence.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Mirror principle: image resonators share identical complex frequency with physical counterparts (ω'1=ω1, ω'2=ω2)
    Invoked in §II.A to justify the 4x4 Hamiltonian structure. Standard electromagnetic theory for perfect mirror.
  • domain assumption Lossfree spacer implies κ'12 = κ12
    Stated in §II.A. Assumes no dielectric or ohmic loss in the air gap between metasurface and mirror.
  • standard math Critical coupling condition γ=2Γ yields perfect absorption / reflection zero
    Invoked in §II.A, referencing refs 57-59. Standard electromagnetic theory for single-port systems.
  • domain assumption PIN diode resistance can be continuously tuned via bias voltage to map singularity space
    Underlies the reconfigurability claim. Calibration details deferred to Supplementary Material 2.
invented entities (1)
  • Hybrid singularity (S2) independent evidence
    purpose: Coupling of a reflection zero with an EP to form a state inheriting EP sensitivity while boosting robustness
    The paper provides simulation data showing power-law frequency scaling (Fig. 5c) and smoother spectral fringes (Fig. 5f) compared to isolated EP. Lake water sensing experiments in Supplementary Material 8 provide additional evidence. However, the robustness improvement is primarily demonstrated against numerical mesh artifacts, not independent experimental noise.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coexistence and manipulation of multiple singularities in a reconfigurable non-Hermitian metasurface." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQPOLEV3

@misc{pith2026260707402,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coexistence and manipulation of multiple singularities in a reconfigurable non-Hermitian metasurface},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQPOLEV3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07402}
}
abstract

Non-Hermitian frameworks extend conventional Hermitian physics, offering a powerful paradigm for describing open systems. Central to this field are various singularities within the complex parameter space, such as exceptional points (EPs) and scattering zeros, which dictate exotic physical behaviors. As research shifts from isolated singularities toward multi-singularity interactions, conventional planar metasurfaces remain constrained by limited tuning dimensions. Here, we propose a mirror-coupled design that maps a metasurface into a quasi-high-dimensional parameter space. By employing a metallic plane to generate image resonators, this scheme multiplies the system degrees of freedom without increasing the number of physical resonators. Its implementation on a reconfigurable platform integrated with PIN diodes yields the coexistence and manipulation of an EP and multiple reflection zeros. Through simulations and microwave experiments, we characterize the dynamic evolution of these singularities and exploit their synergistic effects for two distinct applications. First, for tunable absorption, multiple reflection zeros are spectrally coordinated to achieve a near-perfect absorption band exceeding $99.9\%$ across the X-band, thereby dynamically suppressing target scattering. Second, for enhanced sensing, a reflection zero couples with the EP to form a hybrid singularity. This hybrid state inherits the power-law sensitivity of the EP while substantially boosting robustness against fluctuations, resolving the conventional trade-off between sensitivity and stability and simplifying detection to direct peak tracking rather than complex multimode eigenvalue fitting. Our work provides a general methodology to circumvent parameter competition among non-Hermitian singularities, opening new avenues for multifunctional metadevices across the electromagnetic spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07402 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Conceptual schematic of the mirror-coupled non-Hermitian system and its eigenvalue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Full-wave electromagnetic simulations of the coexisting multiple singularities in the non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Experimental characterization of the coexisting multiple singularities in the non-Hermitian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between simulated and experimentally measured reflectance profiles. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Application demonstrations of the multifunctional non-Hermitian metasurface. (a) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Eqs. (2) and (3) can be rewritten in a more familiar form: ωλ1,2 = ˜ω1 + ˜ω2 +κ 11 +κ 22 2 ± p (κ11 −κ 12 + ˜ω1 −˜ω2)2 + 4(κ12 +κ ′ 12)2 2 ,(4) ωλ3,4 = ˜ω1 + ˜ω2 −κ 22 −κ 11 2 ± p (κ11 −κ 12 −˜ω1 + ˜ω2)2 + 4(κ12 −κ ′ 12)2 2 .(5) Fig. 1(b) depicts the self-intersecting Riemann surfaces formed by these two pairs of nor- malized eigenvalues, which are obtain...

    work page

  2. [2]

    When the bias voltage remains below the diode turn-on threshold, the metasurface be- haves as a near-perfect reflector across the entire X-band. As the bias voltage increases, the reflectance gradually drops, manifesting a broadband suppression profile centered at ap- proximately 38 V, where the minimum reflectance drops below−30 dB. Concurrently, the pha...

    work page

  3. [3]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Physical Review Letters80, 5243 (1998). 17

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher, and P. N. Meisinger, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematical Physics40, 2201 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Reports on Progress in Physics 70, 947 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Assawaworrarit, X

    S. Assawaworrarit, X. Yu, and S. Fan, Robust wireless power transfer using a nonlinear parity–time-symmetric circuit, Nature546, 387 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Y. Choi, C. Hahn, J. W. Yoon, and S. H. Song, Observation of an anti-PT-symmetric excep- tional point and energy-difference conserving dynamics in electrical circuit resonators, Nature Communications9, 2182 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Al` u, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    K.¨Ozdemir, S

    S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nature Materials18, 783 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    W. Tang, X. Jiang, K. Ding, Y.-X. Xiao, Z.-Q. Zhang, C. T. Chan, and G. Ma, Exceptional nexus with a hybrid topological invariant, Science370, 1077 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Kononchuk, J

    R. Kononchuk, J. Cai, F. Ellis, R. Thevamaran, and T. Kottos, Exceptional-point-based accelerometers with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio, Nature607, 697 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Zheng, Y

    J. Zheng, Y. Wang, Z. Guo, H. Jiang, H. Chen, and Y. Sun, Exceptional coupling via multiple channels for crosstalk suppression and flat band with staggered on-site potentials, Communi- cations Physics8, 402 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Z. Rong, Y. Chen, Y. Bai, T. Cui, L. Zhou, S. Liu, and S. Ma, Arbitrary eigenmode reshap- ing induced by distributed non-reciprocity in non-Hermitian systems, Optics and Photonics Research1, 0004 (2026)

    2026

  6. [14]

    H. Qin, W. Lv, Z. Zhang, Z. Yang, J. Li, M. Li, B. Li, J. Zhou, R. Fleury, P. Genevet, Q. Song, and C.-W. Qiu, Photonic exceptional points in engineered materials and their emerging ap- plications, Nature Reviews Materials11, 453 (2026)

    2026

  7. [15]

    Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory, Physical Review A93, 033809 (2016)

    J. Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory, Physical Review A93, 033809 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Chen, S ¸

    W. Chen, S ¸. Kaya ¨Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature548, 192 (2017). 18

    2017

  9. [17]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    J. Xu, Y. Mao, Z. Li, Y. Zuo, J. Zhang, B. Yang, W. Xu, N. Liu, Z. J. Deng, W. Chen, K. Xia, C.-W. Qiu, Z. Zhu, H. Jing, and K. Liu, Single-cavity loss-enabled nanometrology, Nature Nanotechnology19, 1472 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    W. Mao, Z. Fu, Y. Li, F. Li, and L. Yang, Exceptional–point–enhanced phase sensing, Science Advances10, eadl5037 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Nag Chowdhury, P

    B. Nag Chowdhury, P. Lahiri, N. P. Johnson, R. M. De La Rue, and B. Lahiri, Exceptional- point-enhanced superior sensing using asymmetric coupled-lossy-resonator based optical meta- surface, Laser & Photonics Reviews19, 2401661 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    T. S. Bai, W. Z. Wang, X. Zhang, and T. J. Cui, Exceptional point in a microwave plas- monic dipole resonator for sub-microliter solution sensing, Advanced Functional Materials34, 2312170 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Q. Song, M. Odeh, J. Z´ u˜ niga P´ erez, B. Kant´ e, and P. Genevet, Plasmonic topological meta- surface by encircling an exceptional point, Science373, 1133 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Yang, P.-S

    Z. Yang, P.-S. Huang, Y.-T. Lin, H. Qin, J. Z´ u˜ niga P´ erez, Y. Shi, Z. Wang, X. Cheng, M.-C. Tang, S. Han, B. Kant´ e, B. Li, P. C. Wu, P. Genevet, and Q. Song, Creating pairs of exceptional points for arbitrary polarization control: asymmetric vectorial wavefront modulati...

    2024

  16. [24]

    Schumer, Y

    A. Schumer, Y. G. N. Liu, J. Leshin, L. Ding, Y. Alahmadi, A. U. Hassan, H. Nasari, S. Rotter, D. N. Christodoulides, P. LiKamWa, and M. Khajavikhan, Topological modes in a laser cavity through exceptional state transfer, Science375, 884 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    M. S. Ergoktas, S. Soleymani, N. Kakenov, K. Wang, T. B. Smith, G. Bakan, S. Balci, A. Prin- cipi, K. S. Novoselov, S. K. Ozdemir, and C. Kocabas, Topological engineering of terahertz light using electrically tunable exceptional point singularities, Science376, 184 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    A. F. Sadreev, Interference traps waves in an open system: Bound states in the continuum, Reports on Progress in Physics84, 055901 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Huang, L

    L. Huang, L. Xu, D. A. Powell, W. J. Padilla, and A. E. Miroshnichenko, Resonant leaky modes in all-dielectric metasystems: Fundamentals and applications, Physics Reports1008, 1 (2023). 19

    2023

  20. [28]

    Berkhout and A

    A. Berkhout and A. F. Koenderink, Perfect absorption and phase singularities in plasmon antenna array etalons, ACS Photonics6, 2917 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Zhang, N

    F. Zhang, N. S. Solodovchenko, H. Fan, M. F. Limonov, M. Song, Y. S. Kivshar, and A. A. Bogdanov, Non-Hermitian singularities in scattering spectra of mie resonators, Science Ad- vances11, eadr9183 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Shaibe, J

    N. Shaibe, J. M. Erb, and S. M. Anlage, Superuniversal statistics with topological origins for non-Hermitian scattering singularities, Physical Review Research7, 043185 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Liu, Y.-S

    W. Liu, Y.-S. Zeng, J. Zhao, C. Yang, R.-Y. Zhang, X. Cui, G.-B. Wu, and C. T. Chan, Bound states in the continuum as nodal chain points of scattering matrices, Physical Review Letters 135, 243804 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    J. Niu, L. Zhen, J. Liu, and B. Yang, Metasurface demonstration of exceptional points parti- tioned by a line of bound states in the continuum, Physical Review B109, L241302 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    L. Wang, H. Liu, J. Liu, A. Liu, J. Huang, Q. Li, H. Dai, C. Zhang, J. Wu, K. Fan, H. Wang, B. Jin, J. Chen, and P. Wu, Photoswitchable exceptional points derived from bound states in the continuum, Light: Science & Applications14, 377 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Can´ os Valero, Z

    A. Can´ os Valero, Z. Sztranyovszky, E. A. Muljarov, A. Bogdanov, and T. Weiss, Exceptional Bound States in the Continuum, Physical Review Letters134, 103802 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    W. R. Sweeney, C. W. Hsu, S. Rotter, and A. D. Stone, Perfectly absorbing exceptional points and chiral absorbers, Physical Review Letters122, 093901 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    W. R. Sweeney, C. W. Hsu, and A. D. Stone, Theory of reflectionless scattering modes, Physical Review A102, 063511 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Z. Rao, C. Meng, Y. Han, L. Zhu, K. Ding, and Z. An, Braiding reflectionless states in non-Hermitian magnonics, Nature Physics20, 1904 (2024)

    1904

  30. [38]

    S. Liu, S. Ma, R. Shao, L. Zhang, T. Yan, Q. Ma, S. Zhang, and T. J. Cui, Moir´ e metasurfaces for dynamic beamforming, Science Advances8, eabo1511 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    R. Wang, Y. Yang, B. Makki, and A. Shamim, A wideband reconfigurable intelligent surface for 5G millimeter-wave applications, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation72, 2399 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Y. Wu, H. Hu, J. Tian, S. Lei, B. Chen, W. Wang, and H. Lin, A Polarization-Independent Angular-Stable Active Multifunctional Metamaterial for Amplitude Manipulation of Electro- magnetic Waves, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques73, 3699 (2025). 20

    2025

  33. [41]

    Rosas, W

    S. Rosas, W. Adi, A. Beisenova, S. K. Biswas, F. Kuruoglu, H. Mei, M. A. Kats, D. A. Czaplewski, Y. S. Kivshar, and F. Yesilkoy, Enhanced biochemical sensing with high-Q trans- mission resonances in free-standing membrane metasurfaces, Optica12, 178 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    J. Sun, F. Li, S. Yan, S. Shuai, Y. Zhu, X. Wang, J. He, D. Ni, L. Wang, S. Lin, M. Qiu, J. Zhu, and L. Wen, Ultrasensitive biosensing by radiative Q-factor modulation in strongly coupled three-dimensional bound-state-in-the-continuum metasurfaces, Nature Photonics20, 818 (2026)

    2026

  35. [43]

    W. Zhou, X. Bi, X. Wu, Y. Li, J. Zhao, and P. Li, Incoherent-light metalens imager for single-shot partial stokes and edge sensing, ACS Photonics13, 2557 (2026)

    2026

  36. [44]

    Lawrence, N

    M. Lawrence, N. Xu, X. Zhang, L. Cong, J. Han, W. Zhang, and S. Zhang, Manifestation of PT symmetry breaking in polarization space with terahertz metasurfaces, Physical Review Letters113, 093901 (2014)

    2014

  37. [45]

    D. Wang, C. Li, C. Zhang, M. Kang, X. Zhang, B. Jin, Z. Tian, Y. Li, S. Zhang, J. Han, and W. Zhang, Superconductive PT-symmetry phase transition in metasurfaces, Applied Physics Letters110, 021104 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    S. H. Park, S.-G. Lee, S. Baek, T. Ha, S. Lee, B. Min, S. Zhang, M. Lawrence, and T.-T. Kim, Observation of an exceptional point in a non-Hermitian metasurface, Nanophotonics9, 1031 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    X. Shi, H. Lin, T. Liu, Y. Shen, R. Tang, L. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Wu, S. Duan, C. Zhao, and S. Xiao, Polarization-Controlled Non-Hermitian Metasurfaces for Ultra-Sensitive Terahertz Sensing, Laser & Photonics Reviews19, 2500172 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical45, 444016 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Y. Shou, D. Wang, Y. Wang, Q.-K.-L. Huang, H. Chen, W. Yu, R. Ju, H. Chen, and Y. Li, Resonant and scattering exceptional points in non-Hermitian metasurfaces, npj Nanophotonics 2, 29 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    A. Li, H. Wei, M. Cotrufo, W. Chen, S. Mann, X. Ni, B. Xu, J. Chen, J. Wang, S. Fan, C.-W. Qiu, A. Al` u, and L. Chen, Exceptional points and non-Hermitian photonics at the nanoscale, Nature Nanotechnology18, 706 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    S. Xiao, T. Wang, T. Liu, C. Zhou, X. Jiang, and J. Zhang, Active metamaterials and metade- vices: a review, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics53, 503002 (2020). 21

    2020

  44. [52]

    S. Baek, S. H. Park, D. Oh, K. Lee, S. Lee, H. Lim, T. Ha, H. S. Park, S. Zhang, L. Yang, B. Min, and T.-T. Kim, Non-Hermitian chiral degeneracy of gated graphene metasurfaces, Light: Science & Applications12, 87 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    W. He, Y. Hu, Z. Ren, S. Hu, Z. Yu, S. Wan, X. Cheng, and T. Jiang, Transient loss-induced non-Hermitian degeneracies for ultrafast terahertz metadevices, Advanced Science10, 2304972 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    M. A. Masharin, T. Oskolkova, F. Isik, H. V. Demir, A. K. Samusev, and S. V. Makarov, Giant ultrafast all-optical modulation based on exceptional points in exciton–polariton perovskite metasurfaces, ACS Nano18, 3447 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Z. Yu, W. He, S. Hu, Z. Ren, S. Wan, X. Cheng, and T. Jiang, Creating Anti-Chiral Ex- ceptional Points in Non-Hermitian Metasurfaces for Efficient Terahertz Switching, Advanced Science11, 2402615 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    W. He, S. Wan, Y. Zuo, S. Hu, Z. Ren, Z. Yu, D. Yang, X. Cheng, K. Xia, Y. Hu, H. Jing, and T. Jiang, Loss-Enabled Chirality Inversion in Terahertz Metasurfaces, Physical Review Letters134, 106901 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    Colom, E

    R. Colom, E. Mikheeva, K. Achouri, J. Zuniga-Perez, N. Bonod, O. J. F. Martin, S. Burger, and P. Genevet, Crossing of the branch cut: The topological origin of a universal 2π-phase retardation in non-Hermitian metasurfaces, Laser & Photonics Reviews17, 2200976 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    C. Wang, W. R. Sweeney, A. D. Stone, and L. Yang, Coherent perfect absorption at an exceptional point, Science373, 1261 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    J. Wang, A. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Zeng, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, L. Shi, and J. Zi, Manipulating bandwidth of light absorption at critical coupling: An example of graphene integrated with dielectric photonic structure, Physical Review B100, 075407 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    X. Wang, J. Duan, W. Chen, C. Zhou, T. Liu, and S. Xiao, Controlling light absorption of graphene at critical coupling through magnetic dipole quasi-bound states in the continuum resonance, Physical Review B102, 155432 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    M. Liu, W. Chen, G. Hu, S. Fan, D. N. Christodoulides, C. Zhao, and C.-W. Qiu, Spectral phase singularity and topological behavior in perfect absorption, Physical Review B107, L241403 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Beruete and I

    M. Beruete and I. J´ auregui-L´ opez, Terahertz Sensing Based on Metasurfaces, Advanced Op- tical Materials8, 1900721 (2020). 22

    2020

  55. [63]

    J. Tian, H. Luo, Y. Yang, F. Ding, Y. Qu, D. Zhao, M. Qiu, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Active control of anapole states by structuring the phase-change alloy Ge 2Sb2Te5, Nature Commu- nications10, 396 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    X. Qiu, J. Shi, Y. Li, and F. Zhang, All-dielectric multifunctional transmittance-tunable metasurfaces based on guided-mode resonance and ENZ effect, Nanotechnology32, 065202 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    W. He, X. Cheng, S. Hu, Z. Ren, Z. Yu, S. Wan, Y. Hu, and T. Jiang, Color coded metadevices toward programmed terahertz switching, Light: Science & Applications13, 142 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Zhang, S

    K. Zhang, S. Wang, J. Qiu, M. Yang, T. Liu, S. Xiao, I. Staude, T. Pertsch, Y. Wang, and C. Zou, Momentum-space tunable metasurfaces for switchable image processing, Advanced Optical Materials13, 2500352 (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    J. Fan, Y. Zhou, Z. Xue, G. Xu, J. Chen, H. Xing, D. Lu, and L. Cong, Active singular- ity metadevices enabled by bound states in the continuum, Laser & Photonics Reviews19, 2401869 (2025). 23

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.