Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 36 references

From Reality to Recognition: Evaluating Visualization Analogies for Novice Chart Comprehension

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Visualization analogies—charts mapped onto familiar real-world scenes—improve novice analysis performance, reduce cognitive load, and transfer to conventional chart reading.

desk verdict Direct comprehension benefit is plausible; the learning-transfer claim is confounded by exposure order and should be retested or retracted. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03385 v1 pith:BRDVP5PV submitted 2025-06-03 cs.HC

Oliver Huang , Patrick Lee , Carolina Nobre This is my paper
classification cs.HC
keywords visualizationanalogiesnovicechartcomprehensioneducationlearningtransfervisualembellishmentswithin-subjectstudyVARKpreferencesliteracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a new teaching device—a visualization analogy that redraws a chart's data encodings inside a familiar real-world scene—lets novices read and analyze the underlying chart type better than the chart itself. In a within-subject study of 128 novices across eight chart types, analogy versions produced higher scores on visual analysis tasks, lower reported cognitive load, and no loss of attention to data encodings. The authors also argue that the benefit carries over: novices who saw an analogy first later read the corresponding conventional chart better than novices who saw the conventional chart first, which they interpret as learning transfer. If correct, the work gives visualization educators a scalable, low-cost way to introduce unfamiliar chart types before showing standard presentations. The analogy set and study materials are released openly so the technique can be reused and extended.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the visualization analogy itself: a chart re-expressed in a real-world context that preserves the original's data attributes, layout, shape, and proportional scaling. The design criteria are representation of data attributes, visual reconstruction, analysis potential, and scalability, and each analogy was refined through expert review before the study. This object carries the argument because it is the only difference between the analogy and baseline conditions; any performance gap is attributed to the analogical mapping, and the transfer result depends on the analogy's structural resemblance to the baseline chart.

What would settle it

Run the same two-phase procedure with a third group that receives the analogy's real-world scenario as a plain-language description, or as a non-structural image, before the baseline chart. If that group matches the analogy-first group's baseline scores, the claimed transfer is better explained by context familiarity than by the analogy's visual structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Stated on its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that visualization analogies—charts whose visual structure is mapped onto a familiar real-world object while preserving data attributes, layout, and proportional mapping—significantly enhance novices' performance in visual analysis compared with unmodified baseline charts (mean score 22.91 vs 19.77, p=.0004, with a mixed-effects model estimating an 11% advantage), while lowering mental demand, effort, and frustration. The authors further report that exposure to an analogy transfers: participants who saw the analogy before the baseline scored significantly better on the baseline chart (21.42 vs 18.11, p=.007). They also find that interpretation accuracy without titles or context is no worse for analogies overall and better for complex charts, that the benefit is consistent across VARK learning-preference groups, and that most participants found analogies more engaging and less mentally effortful.

Load-bearing premise

The learning-transfer result assumes that the higher baseline scores of participants who saw the analogy first are caused by the analogy itself, rather than by those participants having already met the same data context in the earlier phase, since the study paired the two phases with identical contexts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Analogy versions of a chart can serve as an entry point: novices scored higher on visual analysis tasks with analogies, and time spent was not a significant factor, so the gain did not come from slower, more careful reading.
  • Using an analogy before the conventional chart raised conventional-chart performance, so analogy-first teaching sequences should transfer to standard displays.
  • Visual embellishments did not mislead novices: interpretation accuracy without titles or context was equal to baselines overall and better for complex charts.
  • The technique appears to work across different self-reported learning preferences, so it can be used in mixed classrooms without favoring one modality.
  • Most novices preferred analogies and reported less mental effort and frustration, which may support sustained engagement in visualization education.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves open whether analogies build long-term chart literacy or only immediate recognition; a delayed retention test, or a test with a novel dataset in the same chart type, would separate the two.
  • Because the transfer comparison is vulnerable to context familiarity—the analogy-first group had already met the same data scenario before the baseline—a replication with a third group that receives only the real-world context, without the structural chart mapping, would sharpen the causal claim.
  • A natural pedagogical extension is to fade the analogy: pair each analogy with its baseline display, then remove the analogy once the learner can read the baseline unaided, and measure whether performance holds.
  • For complex multivariate charts such as sunburst diagrams, participants still fell back on simpler chart mental models, so analogy designs may need to explicitly bridge from the analogy to both the target chart and the familiar simple chart.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'visualization analogies'—chart-like representations that map data encodings into familiar real-world contexts—and reports a within-subjects study (N=128) with eight chart types, two counterbalanced exposure orders, and tasks measuring performance, cognitive load, interpretation accuracy, learning preferences, and preferences. The authors claim that analogies significantly improve visual analysis performance, reduce cognitive load, and promote learning transfer to baseline charts, and they open-source the analogy designs and study materials.

Significance. If the main claims hold, this is a useful contribution to visualization education: a low-cost, scalable teaching technique with an open-source stimulus set and a detailed empirical evaluation. The authors' strengths include the expert-review refinement of the analogy designs, the use of a counterbalanced within-subjects design, a multi-faceted task rubric, and the public release of materials, data, and analysis code. The learning-transfer claim, if established, would be a particularly novel and valuable result for the community. However, the transfer claim is currently not well supported due to a confound in the exposure-order design.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.1] The learning-transfer comparison is confounded by exposure order. In the study, Group 1 sees the analogy first and the baseline second, while Group 2 sees the baseline first; the two phases share 'identical contexts' (same real-world scenario, different data values). The transfer analysis in §5.2 compares Group 1's baseline scores (second exposure, with prior analogy and identical context) to Group 2's baseline scores (first exposure, no prior context). The observed 3.31-point advantage (21.42 vs. 18.11, p=0.007) is equally explained by context familiarity, task-format practice, or repeated chart structure. The preliminary check that analogy scores are similar regardless of order does not address this asymmetry, because the absence of an effect on analogy scores does not rule out an effect on baseline scores. Without a baseline-baseline control condition or an independent control for context priming, the claim that analogies 'promote learning transfer to baseline charts' is not established. The authors should either add such a control (not possible with the current data) or reframe this result as a preliminary, confounded observation, revising the abstract and conclusion accordingly.
  2. [§5.1] The headline performance comparison should be supported by a first-exposure between-subjects analysis. The reported paired t-test pools all participants, including Group 1's second-exposure baseline scores, which §5.2 shows are elevated relative to Group 2's first-exposure baselines. A clean comparison of Group 1's first-exposure analogy scores against Group 2's first-exposure baseline scores (controlling for chart type) would separate the analogy effect from any carryover due to order, practice, or context familiarity. If this analysis is not reported, the central RQ1 claim is less convincing, because the counterbalanced design does not by itself eliminate asymmetric carryover effects.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.4] The paper states that Cohen's Kappa was used for the intra-rater reliability test but does not report the resulting value; please include the Kappa statistic so readers can assess scoring consistency.
  2. [§5.1] The cluster analysis used to divide charts into 'simple' and 'complex' is not described; the method (e.g., algorithm, distance metric, number of clusters) and the resulting chart assignments are missing, making the complexity-moderation results non-reproducible.
  3. [§5.5] The phrase '63/28%' appears to be a formatting error; it should likely read '63.28%' or similar.
  4. [Throughout] There are several minor typographical issues, including 'intepretability' in the introduction, 'V oice' in §4.1, and inconsistent 'V ARK' spacing; a copyedit would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; the core empirical claims rest on fresh participant data, and the only self-citation is the authors' own companion paper, which is not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is an empirical user study, not a derivation, so most circularity patterns do not apply. The central performance claim (Section 5.1) compares 128 novices' scores on author-designed analogy charts versus conventional baseline charts using paired tests and a mixed-effects model; the analogy designs were developed through expert review and pilot iteration, but the outcome data come from independent participants and no parameter was fitted to the reported outcome. The learning-transfer claim (Section 5.2) is vulnerable to an exposure-order and context-familiarity confound because Group 1 always saw the baseline after the analogy with identical contexts, but that is an internal-validity threat rather than a circular reduction; the paper does not define the analogy condition in terms of the baseline outcome. The only self-citation is [HLN25], which is the authors' own EuroVis companion paper, cited to point to the open-sourced analogy set; it is not used to justify the empirical result. Accordingly, the derivation chain is self-contained against external participant data, and no step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on several domain assumptions about participant screening, reliability of rubric scoring, and the representativeness of the selected charts and analogies. No numerical free parameters are fit. The visualization analogy is a new construct introduced by the paper; its evidence is internal to the study.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Participants recruited from Prolific are representative of visualization novices after self-rating familiarity at or below 3 out of 5.
    The entire study's conclusions about 'novices' rest on this screening. Self-reported familiarity may not match actual skill.
  • domain assumption The VARK questionnaire captures meaningful learning-style categories that affect how people learn from visualizations.
    RQ4 uses VARK categories; the validity of VARK as a learning-styles instrument is debated, and the paper treats it as a given.
  • domain assumption The rubric-based scoring of open-ended responses is reliable.
    Only an intra-rater reliability test was mentioned; the Kappa value is not reported, and no inter-rater reliability is given.
  • domain assumption The eight chart types are representative of the range of visualization complexity.
    The eight charts from the Visual Vocabulary are selected by the authors to span univariate, bivariate, and multivariate data, but no external benchmark justifies this sampling.
  • ad hoc to paper The analogy designs faithfully preserve the data attributes of their corresponding charts.
    The design criteria and expert review are internal; there is no independent measure of mapping fidelity beyond the authors' rubric.
invented entities (1)
  • Visualization analogy
    purpose: A chart representation that maps data structures to real-world objects for teaching
    The only evidence for the effectiveness of this construct is the study reported in this paper; the open-source repository provides materials for replication but no external predictive handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Reality to Recognition: Evaluating Visualization Analogies for Novice Chart Comprehension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BRDVP5PV

@misc{pith2026250603385,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Reality to Recognition: Evaluating Visualization Analogies for Novice Chart Comprehension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BRDVP5PV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03385}
}
read the original abstract

Novice learners often have difficulty learning new visualization types because they tend to interpret novel visualizations through the mental models of simpler charts they have previously encountered. Traditional visualization teaching methods, which usually rely on directly translating conceptual aspects of data into concrete data visualizations, often fail to attend to the needs of novice learners navigating this tension. To address this, we conducted an empirical exploration of how analogies can be used to help novices with chart comprehension. We introduced visualization analogies: visualizations that map data structures to real-world contexts to facilitate an intuitive understanding of novel chart types. We evaluated this pedagogical technique using a within-subject study (N=128) where we taught 8 chart types using visualization analogies. Our findings show that visualization analogies improve visual analysis skills and help learners transfer their understanding to actual charts. They effectively introduce visual embellishments, cater to diverse learning preferences, and are preferred by novice learners over traditional chart visualizations. This study offers empirical insights and open-source tools to advance visualization education through analogical reasoning.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03385 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example use of a visualization analogy (top) providing an accessible entry point to understanding the underlying data visualization, a waterfall chart (bottom). The Mario analogy preserves the main features of a waterfall chart (common baseline in adjacent bars) to teach novice viewers how to read the chart. Abstract Novice learners often have difficulty learning new visualization types because they tend to interpre… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Chart Selection Framework for Analogy Design Dimensionality affects the complexity of data visualization. To expose learners to various visual complexities, we included charts for univariate, bivariate, and multivariate datasets [Den18], making our analogy framework adaptable to diverse data structures. Data scales also shape data visualization and comprehension [BBG19]. We assessed visualization analogies across sc… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the 8 selected visualization analogies for the study, chosen based on their alignment with chart characteristics, contextual relevance, and scalability across diverse datasets. ment cycles to ensure each visualization analogy met our design requirements. The analogies were then presented to five established visualization researchers, all tenure-track faculty, for formal expert review. These reviewers use… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Study procedure overview: participant progression through screening, VARK questionnaire, division into 2 balanced groups, and finally preference questionnaire. The study employed a within-subjects design, with participants evenly distributed into two groups to counterb…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Example sketch questions showcasing visual recreations of a histogram chart (top) and a waterfall plot (bottom) Reading/Writing (n = 31), and Kinesthetic (n = 39). The study re￾ceived approval from our institute’s ethics review board, and in￾formed consent was obtained…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: illustrates the procedure for each phase. Each phase began with participants viewing a visualization without any ac￾companying title or description. They were asked to interpret the chart’s purpose and identify key data points based solely on its visual representation …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: An overview of visual analysis tasks results (from left to right): the average performance score for each technique; the average time spent on each technique; self-reported evaluations on perceptions of understanding, ease of interpretation, and confidence from initial…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Overview of learning transfer result. (left) performance score by first and second exposure to each technique; (right) self￾rated perceived learning transfer on a scale of 1 to 7 Given that analogy charts are not affected by potential learning effects from the baseline…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (left) Performance score with analogies across all learn￾ing preferences. (right) Comparative preference results: each bar displays the percentage of participants favoring analogies versus baseline charts for each of the displayed questions. 5.5. RQ5 [Preference]: Enga…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry.original add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 i...

  3. [3]

    : Visualizing success: Amplifying learning outcomes across vark learning preferences through visual notes

    Aunhabundit N., Cheng Chieh Lu A. : Visualizing success: Amplifying learning outcomes across vark learning preferences through visual notes. Science, Technology, and Social Sciences Procedia 2024, 6 (Jul. 2024), ICCM03

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    : Interpreting the effect of embellishment on chart visualizations

    Andry T., Hurter C., Lambotte F., Fastrez P., Telea A. : Interpreting the effect of embellishment on chart visualizations. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021), ACM . https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445739 doi:10.1145/3411764.3445739

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    : Roboviz: A Game-Centered Project for Information Visualization Education

    Adar E., Lee-Robbins E. : Roboviz: A Game-Centered Project for Information Visualization Education . IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics (Jan. 2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209402 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209402

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    : Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments

    Borner K., Bueckle A., Ginda M. : Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807180116 doi:10.1073/pnas.1807180116

    doi:10.1073/pnas.1807180116 2019

  7. [7]

    S., AlKadi M., Stoiber C., Huron S

    Bach B., Keck M., Rajabiyazdi F., Losev T., Meirelles I., Dykes J., Laramee R. S., AlKadi M., Stoiber C., Huron S. : Challenges and opportunities in data visualization education: A call to action. IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327378 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327378

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    : Who do we mean when we talk about visualization novices? In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2023), Association for Computing Machinery, pp

    Burns A., Lee C., Chawla R., Peck E., Mahyar N. : Who do we mean when we talk about visualization novices? In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2023), Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581524 doi:10.1145/3544548.3581524

    arXiv 2023

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    L., Gutwin C., Genest A., McDine D., Brooks C

    Bateman S., Mandryk R. L., Gutwin C., Genest A., McDine D., Brooks C. : Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010), ACM . https://doi.org/10.1145/1...

    2010

  2. [10]

    A., Vo A

    Borkin M. A., Vo A. A., Bylinskii Z., Isola P., Sunkavalli S., Oliva A., Pfister H. : What makes a visualization memorable? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.234

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    : Strategies and difficulties during students’ construction of data visualizations

    Chang H.-Y., Chang Y.-J., Tsai M.-J. : Strategies and difficulties during students’ construction of data visualizations. International Journal of STEM Education (02 2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00463-w doi:10.1186/s40594-024-00463-w

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    H., Alper B., Plaisant C., Boy J., Elmqvist N

    Chevalier F., Riche N. H., Alper B., Plaisant C., Boy J., Elmqvist N. : Observations and reflections on visualization literacy in elementary school. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2018.032421650 doi:10.1109/MCG.2018.032421650

    2018

  5. [13]

    : Beyond numbers: Creating analogies to enhance data comprehension and communication with generative AI

    Chen Q., Shuai W., Zhang J., Sun Z., Cao N. : Beyond numbers: Creating analogies to enhance data comprehension and communication with generative AI . In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (5 2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642480 doi:10...

    2024

  6. [14]

    : Using concrete scales: A practical framework for effective visual depiction of complex measures

    Chevalier F., Vuillemot R., Gali G. : Using concrete scales: A practical framework for effective visual depiction of complex measures. 2426--2435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.210 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.210

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    Denis D. J. : SPSS Data Analysis for Univariate, Bivariate, and Multivariate Statistics . John Wiley & Sons, 2018. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1002/9781119465775 doi:DOI: 10.1002/9781119465775

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    : How information visualization novices construct visualizations

    Grammel L., Tory M., Storey M.-A. : How information visualization novices construct visualizations. IEEE transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics 16, 6 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    : Diagram safari: A visualization literacy game for young children

    Gäbler J., Winkler C., Lengyel N., Aigner W., Stoiber C., Wallner G., Kriglstein S. : Diagram safari: A visualization literacy game for young children. In Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145...

    2019

  10. [18]

    : Incorporating analogies and worked out examples as pedagogical strategies in a computer science tutoring system

    Harsley R., Green N., Alizadeh M., Acharya S., Fossati D., Di Eugenio B., AlZoubi O. : Incorporating analogies and worked out examples as pedagogical strategies in a computer science tutoring system. In Proceedings of the 47th acm technical symposium on computing science educa...

    2016

  11. [19]

    : The state of the art in map-like visualization

    Hogräfer M., Heitzler M., Schulz H.-J. : The state of the art in map-like visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 39, 3 (2020), 647--674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14031 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14031

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    : Improving comprehension of measurements using concrete re-expression strategies

    Hullman J., Kim Y.-S., Nguyen F., Speers L., Agrawala M. : Improving comprehension of measurements using concrete re-expression strategies. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018), pp. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173608 doi:10....

    2018

  13. [21]

    Huang O., Lee P. Y. K., Nobre C. : From Reality to Recognition: Evaluating Visualization Analogies for Novice Chart Comprehension . In EuroVis 2025 - Education Papers (2025), Aurisano J., Laramee R. S., Nobre C., (Eds.), The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/ev...

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    : Designing Narrative-Focused Role-Playing Games for Visualization Literacy in Young Children

    Huynh E., Nyhout A., Ganea P., Chevalier F. : Designing Narrative-Focused Role-Playing Games for Visualization Literacy in Young Children . IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics 27, 02 (Feb. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030464 doi:10.1109/TVCG.202...

    2021

  15. [23]

    G., Treagust D

    Harrison A. G., Treagust D. F. : Teaching and learning with analogies: Friend or foe? Metaphor and analogy in science education (2006), 11--24. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_2 doi:10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_2

    2006 doi

  16. [24]

    : Generating personalized spatial analogies for distances and areas

    Kim Y.-S., Hullman J., Agrawala M. : Generating personalized spatial analogies for distances and areas. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 38--48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858440 doi:1...

    2016

  17. [25]

    : Visual information literacy: Definition, construct modeling and assessment

    Locoro A., Fisher Jr W., Mari L. : Visual information literacy: Definition, construct modeling and assessment. IEEE Access (05 2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3078429 doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3078429

    2021

  18. [26]

    : The effectiveness of teaching science with pictorial analogies

    Lin H.-s., Shiau B.-r., Lawrenz F. : The effectiveness of teaching science with pictorial analogies. Research in Science Education 26, 4 (1996), 495--511. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357457 doi:10.1007/BF02357457

    1996 doi

  19. [27]

    : Breaking the bar chart: why chart types are holding us back and how metaphors can help

    Morrill R. : Breaking the bar chart: why chart types are holding us back and how metaphors can help. Northeastern University (2017). https://doi.org/10.17760/D20257369 doi:10.17760/D20257369

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    J., Pickering D

    Marzano R. J., Pickering D. J., Pollock J. E. : Classroom Instruction That Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2001

    2001

  21. [29]

    : Reading between the pixels: Investigating the barriers to visualization literacy

    Nobre C., Zhu K., M \"o rth E., Pfister H., Beyer J. : Reading between the pixels: Investigating the barriers to visualization literacy. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2024), pp. 1--17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642760 doi:10...

    2024

  22. [30]

    : What students learn with personal data physicalization

    Perin C. : What students learn with personal data physicalization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 41, 6 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    J., Michael S

    Prithishkumar I. J., Michael S. A. : Understanding your student: using the vark model. Journal of postgraduate medicine (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.132337 doi:10.4103/0022-3859.132337

    2014

  24. [32]

    M., Goldstein D

    Riederer C., Hofman J. M., Goldstein D. G. : To put that in perspective: Generating analogies that make numbers easier to understand. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018), pp. 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174122 doi:10.1145/3...

    2018

  25. [33]

    : Learning visualizations by analogy: Promoting visual literacy through visualization morphing

    Ruchikachorn P., Mueller K. : Learning visualizations by analogy: Promoting visual literacy through visualization morphing. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2413786 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2413786

    2015

  26. [34]

    : Scalability in visualization

    Richer G., Pister A., Abdelaal M., Fekete J.-D., Sedlmair M., Weiskopf D. : Scalability in visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 30, 7 (July 2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3231230 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2022.3231230

    2024

  27. [35]

    : Effects of visual analogies on learner outcomes: Bridging from the known to the unknown

    Spezzini S. : Effects of visual analogies on learner outcomes: Bridging from the known to the unknown. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 4 (07 2010). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040211 doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040211

    2010 arXiv

  28. [36]

    : Visual analogies, not graphs, increase patients' comprehension of changes in their health status

    Turchioe M., Grossman L., Myers A., Baik D., Goyal P., Masterson Creber R. : Visual analogies, not graphs, increase patients' comprehension of changes in their health status. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 27 (01 2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/oc...

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.