Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Prior-Based Multi-Voltage Threshold Sampling as a Structured Inverse Problem

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper recasts multi-voltage-threshold sampling as a structured inverse problem and derives a Fisher-information equation for optimal threshold placement.

desk verdict Solid formal framework for MVT inverse problems, but the validation tests a D-optimal workaround rather than the claimed effective-information design equation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04863 v2 pith:BRPMQZ2G submitted 2026-08-05 physics.med-ph eess.SPphysics.ins-det

Ao Qiu , Qingguo Xie This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-pheess.SPphysics.ins-det
keywords multi-voltagethresholdsamplingstructuredinverseproblemFisherinformationidentifiabilitydesignscintillationdetectorspartialtriggeringbi-exponentialpulsemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to give prior-based Multi-Voltage Threshold (MVT) sampling a unified mathematical foundation. Its central proposal is that, for strictly unimodal pulse families, the ordered set of paired threshold-crossing times should be treated as the observation map of a structured inverse problem, with identifiability, noise propagation, model mismatch, and threshold design all following from that map. On that foundation it derives a stochastic timing-error model, a leading-order bias formula for model mismatch, and a threshold-design theory in which optimal ladders maximize nuisance-profiled Fisher information; the closed-form amplitude-MSE proxy is $B^*_A = [\sum_n \Phi_A^{(n)}(V^*_n; \gamma^*)]^{-1} + \beta^2_{A,\mathrm{tot}}$. The value of getting this right is that detector threshold placement stops being an empirical heuristic and becomes a computable optimization with explicit recipes and a diagnostic for when the model is misspecified.

What carries the argument

The central object is the paired-crossing observation map $S: \theta \mapsto t$ defined by the level-set equations $f(t_{r,n};\theta)=V_n$ and $f(t_{f,n};\theta)=V_n$, whose Jacobian is $J_{kj} = -(\partial f/\partial \theta_j)/(\partial f/\partial t)$. The identity that carries the design theory is the nuisance-profiled effective-information decomposition: for target $\vartheta$ and nuisance $\eta$, the total effective Fisher information equals $\sum_n \Phi_\vartheta^{(n)}(V_n; \gamma)$ with per-pair projected contributions $\Phi_\vartheta^{(n)} = \tilde{g}_r^2/D_r + \tilde{g}_f^2/D_f$ evaluated at the global coupling vector $\gamma = (I_{\eta\eta}^{\mathrm{tot}})^{-1} I_{\eta\vartheta}^{\mathrm{tot}}$. Thresholds are fixed by the stationarity condition $d\Phi/dV = 2(\Delta I_{\mathrm{eff}})^2 \beta \, \partial\beta/\partial V$, and the closed-form amplitude-MSE proxy is $B^*_A = [\sum_n \Phi_A^{(n)}(V^*_n; \gamma^*)]^{-1} + \beta^2_{A,\mathrm{tot}}$. A dimensionless D-optimal criterion $\log \det(\tilde{I})$ is added as a regulariser to stop threshold clustering from making the full Fisher matrix near-singular.

What would settle it

Measure the actual crossing-time covariance matrix of a comparator/TDC chain on real pulses and check it against the diagonal affine prediction; if off-diagonal correlations are significant or the variance deviates from $\sigma_{\mathrm{th}}^2 + \kappa V$ at low thresholds, the Fisher-optimal ladders predicted by the theory will not reproduce the realized estimator variance. A simpler decisive test: on held-out photopeak pulses, compute realized amplitude MSE for the D-optimal ladder and for uniform ladders; if the theory-guided ladder does not systematically beat uniform spacing under controlled initialization, the central design claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that prior-based MVT is a well-posed structured inverse problem for strictly unimodal pulses. The forward map $S: \theta \mapsto t$, defined implicitly by $f(t_k; \theta) = V_{\ell(k)}$, is shown to be a $C^2$ embedding on the admissible domain when injectivity, full Jacobian rank, and properness hold, so the deterministic recovery problem is globally identifiable; for the bi-exponential family the paper verifies these hypotheses on a compact physical prior and shows three threshold pairs suffice. The stochastic layer adds a diagonal timing-error model from Campbell's theorem, a leading-order mismatch bias $\beta = (J^\top W J)^{-1} J^\top W \Delta t_{\mathrm{bias}}$, and a profiled effective-information identity $\Delta I_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\mathrm{tot}} = \sum_n \Phi_\vartheta^{(n)}(V_n; \gamma)$ that turns threshold design into a stationarity problem with the closed-form proxy $B^*_A = [\sum_n \Phi_A^{(n)}]^{-1} + \beta^2_{A,\mathrm{tot}}$. The paper's own experiments on 10,000 $^{22}$Na/LYSO/SiPM pulses show Fisher-guided (D-optimal) thresholds reduce median amplitude bias from -4.8% to -1.2% relative to uniform spacing in the photopeak regime, while the mismatch diagnostic $\rho_{\mathrm{bias}} \approx 0.60$ marks the boundary of the well-specified regime.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that a simple formula — thermal noise plus shot noise proportional to threshold voltage plus timing-quantization jitter, treated as independent — accurately describes real crossing-time errors; the paper's own validation finds this well-specified condition only partly holds, with median bias-to-variance ratio near 0.60.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Threshold design for MVT becomes a computable optimization: given fitted pulse and noise parameters, the stationarity equations yield an executable ladder, so future detectors can be designed from the theory rather than from ad hoc spacing rules.
  • Identifiability has a concrete hardware consequence: for the five-parameter bi-exponential model, at least three active threshold pairs are needed for finite amplitude or timing bounds; fewer thresholds leave the inverse problem underdetermined in the nuisance directions.
  • Heterogeneous threshold placements are superadditive: multiple pairs jointly disentangle amplitude-time nuisance coupling better than any single pair, so the optimal design is not simply a sum of per-pair information scores.
  • Because single-parameter Fisher optimization can concentrate thresholds at support voltages and make the Jacobian near-singular, the paper shows that D-optimal regularization is needed in practice; on the photopeak dataset it improved conditioning and cut median amplitude bias roughly fourfold.
  • The framework exposes its own regime boundary: partial triggering and model mismatch erode the predictive power of Fisher-guided optimization, and the bias-to-variance diagnostic near 0.60 marks where closed-form well-specified recipes should be replaced by misspecification-aware fitting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the diagonal noise model is the main source of error, replacing it with a measured full covariance matrix could shift the predicted optimal thresholds; this is a direct test of the framework's quantitative layer.
  • The same embedding-and-profiling machinery should transfer to timing-target designs and to other strictly unimodal pulse families, but the paper only instantiates amplitude-target design for the bi-exponential model.
  • The rho_bias diagnostic could serve as an online per-pulse mismatch monitor, flagging events for which closed-form threshold recipes should give way to a misspecification-aware estimator.
  • For pile-up or high-rate regimes, the single-event isolation assumption fails, so the identifiability and design results do not automatically extend there.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified mathematical treatment of prior-based Multi-Voltage Threshold (MVT) sampling for strictly unimodal pulse families, treating the ordered threshold-crossing times as a structured inverse problem. It proves deterministic identifiability conditions via Chebyshev/Wronskian arguments, introduces a stochastic timing-error model with an affine voltage variance and a diagonal pseudo-Gaussian covariance, derives a nuisance-profiled effective-information quantity, and presents a threshold-design theory culminating in a closed-form amplitude-MSE proxy (Eq. (110)). The framework is instantiated for a five-parameter bi-exponential pulse model, and implementation recipes are given for single- and multi-event scenarios. The experimental part uses 10,000 measured 22Na/LYSO/SiPM pulses: it reports a model-mismatch diagnostic (median ρ_bias ≈ 0.60), and then compares uniform threshold placement with a D-optimal placement, finding a reduction in median amplitude bias from −4.8% to −1.2% and an increase in the fraction of pulses within 5% relative error from 51.3% to 82.0% on the photopeak population.

Significance. If the theoretical claims are correct, the paper provides a valuable conceptual advance: it recasts MVT threshold placement as a Fisher-information optimization problem rather than an empirical heuristic, and it contributes rigorous identifiability results for bi-exponential pulses from paired crossings. The Chebyshev/Wronskian-based identifiability proof (Section VIII-B) is coherent and self-contained, and the Schur-complement/Fisher-decomposition algebra (Sections VI–VII) is internally consistent. The paper also deserves credit for explicitly acknowledging the surrogate status of its noise model and for reporting a diagnostic that quantifies model mismatch rather than claiming perfect specification. However, the experimental validation tests an objective different from the one derived as the central design rule, which limits the evidentiary support for the paper's strongest claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section X-C, Eq. (192)] The validation does not test the claimed design equation: after deriving the stationarity condition Eq. (109) and the recipe Eq. (151) based on the nuisance-profiled effective-information Φ_A, Section X-C1 explicitly abandons that objective in favor of log det I (Eq. (192)), because the Φ_A objective clusters thresholds and makes J^T W J ill-conditioned. The threshold set V* = {54,105,213,264,315,664,714,765} mV is therefore not the minimizer of Eq. (110), and the reported improvement over uniform thresholds demonstrates only that some Fisher-guided placement with conditioning regularization helps on this dataset. The abstract's claim that the experiments 'confirm' the framework's threshold designs is too strong; a direct test of the Eq. (109)/(151) configuration, or a clear statement that Eq. (110) itself is not validated, is needed.
  2. [Section IX-D, Table I] The well-specified precondition behind the bias-free design recipe is not satisfied: Table I reports a median ρ_bias = 5.98×10^−1 and a 95th percentile of 4.49, so (β_direct_A)^2 is comparable to or larger than the variance floor B_0^(A). The recipe in Section IX-B3 and the simplified stationarity Eq. (132) rely on ε(t) ≈ 0, yet the paper's own diagnostic shows that this condition is not uniformly valid. Consequently, the validation results do not support the full misspecified MSE proxy in Eq. (110), which includes β^2_{A,tot}; the bias term is not accounted for in the experiments. The paper should either incorporate the bias projection into the validated design or explicitly restrict the validation claims to the well-specified (ε≈0) regime and explain why the D-optimal procedure remains useful despite the mismatch.
  3. [Section X-B, Eqs. (184) and reference standard] The reference amplitude A_ref is obtained by fitting the same five-parameter bi-exponential model to the full 50,000-sample waveform, so the reported errors measure agreement with the model-based full-waveform estimate, not accuracy against an independent ground truth. This is acknowledged in the text, but it weakens the external-validity claim that the framework yields accurate amplitude reconstruction; any systematic bias shared by the bi-exponential model remains in A_ref. The paper should state more prominently that the validation is a model-internal comparison, and ideally include at least one independent check (e.g., against the directly observed peak voltage V_peak or a separately calibrated energy scale).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section IX-D] The text refers to 'Eqs. (R.6a)–(R.6j)' and 'Eq. R.6d' without a main-text definition of these equations; the notation appears to point to an appendix that is not clearly identified. Please label the appendix explicitly or inline the relevant formulas.
  2. [Section X-C3, Eq. (197)] The dynamic-range coverage constraint ΔV_cov_min = (V_peak,min − b)/(2N) is introduced as an engineering heuristic; the remark contrasting it with the bandwidth diagnostic is useful, but the choice of the factor 1/(2N) is arbitrary. A short justification or citation would help.
  3. [General notation] The paper alternates between V_n and V_k for thresholds and between ordered-crossing and threshold-indexed notation. While the conventions are defined in Section II-A, the frequent switching (e.g., Eqs. (6), (85), (194)) makes the reading unnecessarily difficult; a consistent subscript convention would improve clarity.
  4. [Figure captions] Figures 1–3 report quantitative statistics (e.g., ρ_bias values) but the captions do not state the definitions of all plotted quantities; for example, Figure 2 and Figure 3 both show ρ_bias but with different axes and color scales. Please make the captions self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation chain is self-contained and the central algebra is not equivalent to its inputs by construction; the empirical gap (D-optimal design rather than Eq. 110, model-internal reference) is a scope limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's mathematical derivation is internally self-contained rather than circular. The deterministic identifiability analysis (Section VIII-B) proves injectivity and immersion for the bi-exponential family via a verified Chebyshev-system Wronskian, not by assuming the target result. The stochastic model (Eq. 5, Eq. 7, Eq. 20) is introduced explicitly as a first-order surrogate with stated assumptions, and the effective-information equation (Eq. 110) follows from algebraic Schur-complement identities and stationarity conditions, not from a quantity that was defined in terms of the claimed prediction. The noise constants are estimated from the data, but they are inputs to the Fisher-information calculations rather than being fitted to the amplitude-reconstruction outcome. The reference amplitude Aref is admittedly the full-waveform fit of the same bi-exponential model, and the paper itself flags that this is not absolute ground truth; this makes the validation model-internal, but the improvement of D-optimal over uniform thresholds is not forced by construction because the threshold design and the reconstruction error are not the same objective. The paper's own Section X-C1 explicitly abandons the Phi_A objective in favor of D-optimality for conditioning reasons, so the empirical validation does not test Eq. 109/110 as a design rule; this is a validation gap and a correctness/scope risk, not circularity. The self-citations to prior MVT hardware work are contextual and not load-bearing for the mathematical claims. Therefore no step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by definition, and the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 14 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The framework rests on a chain of standard statistical approximations, namely Campbell's theorem, the central limit theorem, diagonal covariance, and pseudo-Gaussian TDC noise, plus the bi-exponential pulse model. The authors explicitly label many of these as first-order surrogates. The well-specified epsilon(t) ~ 0 assumption is tested and found only partially valid, which is the main caveat on the ledger.

free parameters (7)
  • sigma_th = 9.51 mV
    Estimated from the pre-pulse baseline standard deviation of the same 10,000-pulse dataset; enters the affine voltage variance model Eq. (5) and all Fisher denominators.
  • kappa = 1 mV
    Single-photoelectron voltage amplitude chosen as a conservative estimate; enters the Poisson shot-noise term in Eq. (5).
  • sigma_TDC = 5.77 ps
    Computed as Delta_t_samp / sqrt(12) from the 20 ps sampling interval; pseudo-Gaussian quantization model.
  • Design-point parameters theta_design = Median full-waveform fit over 3,304 photopeak pulses
    The median bi-exponential parameters [A, tau_d, tau_r, b] are used for the locally D-optimal threshold design.
  • Per-pulse bi-exponential fits = Five parameters fit to each of 10,000 pulses
    Used to compute mismatch diagnostics, the full-waveform reference amplitude Aref, and the model-mismatch ratio rho_bias.
  • D_theta normalization scales = Ad hoc per-parameter scales
    Used to make the D-optimal determinant dimensionless; fixed during optimization, so it does not change the optimizer.
  • Delta_V_cov_min = (V_peak,min - b) / (2N)
    Coverage-spacing heuristic used to prevent threshold clustering in the D-optimal coordinate descent.
assumptions (14)
  • domain assumption Strict unimodality and single-event isolation: each acquisition window contains one dominant pulse with exactly one local maximum.
    Invoked in Section II-A to define the paired-crossing observation geometry and the dynamic feasible parameter set Theta_V.
  • domain assumption Static calibrated thresholds and no waveform plateau: comparator thresholds are event-independent and every crossing lies on a strictly monotone branch.
    Invoked in Section II-A to guarantee transversality and the implicit-function arguments for the observation map.
  • domain assumption Linear superposition and stationary single-photoelectron response for the SiPM readout.
    Invoked in Section III-A to apply Campbell's theorem and derive the affine voltage variance model.
  • domain assumption Short single-photoelectron window and slowly varying intensity, so the variance law is approximately affine.
    Used in Section III-A and Appendix B to reduce exact filtered-Poisson moments to Eq. (5).
  • domain assumption Noise-source independence among thermal noise, Poisson shot noise, and TDC quantization.
    Used in Section III-A to justify additive variance composition in Eq. (5) and Eq. (7).
  • ad hoc to paper Small-jitter local linearization and diagonal covariance for crossings that satisfy bandwidth separation.
    Used in Sections III-B and IV-A to obtain the closed-form diagonal Fisher information; the authors explicitly label this a first-order surrogate.
  • domain assumption Gaussian regime with high photoelectron counts at each threshold.
    Invoked in Section IV-A to justify the approximate Gaussian likelihood and Gauss-Newton estimator.
  • domain assumption Pseudo-Gaussian quantization of TDC error with variance LSB^2/12.
    Used in Section IV-A and Appendix P to add a simple quantization variance term.
  • domain assumption Perturbative and locally flat model mismatch near each crossing.
    Used in Section V to derive the leading-order temporal bias projection Eq. (14).
  • domain assumption Locally constant bias and model-based FIM validity under small misspecification.
    Used in Section V to replace the true score covariance with the model-based Fisher information in the MSE surrogate bound.
  • domain assumption Global nuisance and target identifiability: the aggregated nuisance block is positive definite and the profiled target information is positive.
    Invoked in Sections VI-B and VII-D to make the Schur complement and the partial-triggering MSE proxy well defined.
  • ad hoc to paper Well-specified bi-exponential model, epsilon(t) ~ 0, in the design recipes.
    Assumed in Section IX-B3 for the stationarity-based design recipe; later tested in Section IX-D and found only partially valid for amplitude estimation.
  • domain assumption Bi-exponential macromodel with effective macroscopic rise and decay constants after baseline subtraction.
    Introduced in Section VIII-A as the concrete pulse family; the authors note these are effective readout constants, not bare material constants.
  • standard math Extended Chebyshev system property for real exponential-polynomial families with prescribed multiplicities.
    Used in Section VIII-B and Appendix H to prove the Wronskian positivity and zero-counting bound that underpin global immersion and injectivity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Prior-Based Multi-Voltage Threshold Sampling as a Structured Inverse Problem." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BRPMQZ2G

@misc{pith2026260804863,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Prior-Based Multi-Voltage Threshold Sampling as a Structured Inverse Problem},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BRPMQZ2G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04863}
}
abstract

Prior-based Multi-Voltage Threshold (MVT) sampling reconstructs pulse parameters from sparse threshold-crossing times rather than full waveforms, making parameter recovery inherently a model-dependent inverse problem. However, prior-based MVT has lacked a formal mathematical statement, leaving identifiability, stochastic error propagation, and threshold design without a unified theoretical foundation. We formalize prior-based MVT for strictly unimodal pulse families as a structured inverse problem. On that foundation, we develop the first unified theory of prior-based MVT, comprising deterministic identifiability conditions, a stochastic timing-error model with leading-order mismatch bias, and a nuisance-profiled threshold-design theory centered on an effective-information equation for robust single-event and partial-trigger multi-event operation. We instantiate the framework for the bi-exponential pulse model, derive executable design recipes, and validate the resulting predictions on a 10,000-pulse $^{22}$Na/LYSO/SiPM dataset. The experiments confirm that the framework yields useful threshold designs in the photopeak regime while also revealing the regime boundary at which partial triggering and model mismatch limit the predictive power of Fisher-guided optimization. These results provide the first unified mathematical foundation for prior-based MVT and recast it from an empirical threshold heuristic as a principled inferential framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04863 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of the direct amplitude bias-to-variance ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative single-channel pulse illustrating model misspecification [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two-dimensional histogram of the direct amplitude bias-to-variance () [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Four representative photopeak pulses reconstructed with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of the relative amplitude error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the relative amplitude error for the D-optimal ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Four representative photopeak pulses reconstructed with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Normalised peak-voltage histogram of 10,000 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Four representative pulses from the extended energy window [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Distribution of the relative amplitude error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Distribution of the relative amplitude error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_13.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Four representative pulses from the extended energy window [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_12.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A new approach for pulse processing in positron emission tomography,

    Q. Xie, C.-M. Kao, Z. Hsiau, and C.-T. Chen, “A new approach for pulse processing in positron emission tomography,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 988–995, Aug. 2005

    2005

  2. [2]

    FPGA-Only MVT Digitizer for TOF PET,

    D. Xi, C.-M. Kao, W. Liu, C. Zeng, X. Liu, and Q. Xie, “FPGA-Only MVT Digitizer for TOF PET,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 3253–3261, Oct. 2013

    2013

  3. [3]

    Implementation of LYSO/PSPMT Block Detector With All Digital DAQ System,

    Q. Xie, Y . Chen, J. Zhu, J. Liu, X. Wang, W. Liu, X. Chen, M. Niu, Z. Wu, D. Xi, L. Wang, P. Xiao, C.-T. Chen, and C.-M. Kao, “Implementation of LYSO/PSPMT Block Detector With All Digital DAQ System,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1487–1494, Jun. 2013

    2013

  4. [4]

    Development and evaluation of a new high-TOF-resolution all-digital brain PET system,

    L. Fang, B. Zhang, B. Li, X. Zhang, X. Zhou, J. Yang, A. Li, X. Shi, Y . Liu, M. Kreissl, N. D’Ascenzo, P. Xiao, and Q. Xie, “Development and evaluation of a new high-TOF-resolution all-digital brain PET system,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 69, no. 2, p. 025019, Jan. 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    Performance Evaluation of New PET/CT DigitMI 930,

    B. Zhang, B. Li, L. Fang, X. Zhou, A. Li, X. Zhang, Y . Liu, Z. Wang, C.-M. Kao, Y . Liu, X. Zhu, L. Wan, P. Xiao, X. Chen, H. Iida, J. Knuuti, and Q. Xie, “Performance Evaluation of New PET/CT DigitMI 930,” IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 578–585, May 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Threshold optimization in multi-voltage threshold digitizers for TOF PET detector,

    Z. Deng, H. Wu, W. Xiong, A. Zhao, C. Han, J. Lu, Y . Yang, Z. Duan, P. Xiao, J. Tang, and Q. Xie, “Threshold optimization in multi-voltage threshold digitizers for TOF PET detector,” in2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–3

    2017

  7. [7]

    Empirical bayesian energy estimation for multi- voltage threshold digitizer in PET,

    Z. Deng and Q. Xie, “Empirical bayesian energy estimation for multi- voltage threshold digitizer in PET,” in2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC). IEEE, 2013, pp. 1–5

    2013

  8. [8]

    Quadratic programming time pickoff method for multivoltage threshold digitizer in PET,

    Z. Deng and Q. Xie, “Quadratic programming time pickoff method for multivoltage threshold digitizer in PET,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 805–813, 2015

    2015

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Neural-network-based energy calculation for multivoltage threshold sampling,

    H. Xu, H. Wang, F. Xu, R. Cheng, B. Zhang, L. Fang, Q. Xie, and P. Xiao, “Neural-network-based energy calculation for multivoltage threshold sampling,”IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 311–318, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    An investigation of baseline calibration method for digitally sampling scintillation pulses in PET,

    Q. Xie, Y . Chen, Z. Wu, J. Zhu, X. Wang, D. Xi, and J. Zhao, “An investigation of baseline calibration method for digitally sampling scintillation pulses in PET,” in2010 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC). IEEE, 2010, pp. 1480–1482

    2010

  3. [11]

    Automatic threshold calibration for MVT-Based all digital PET,

    L. Fang, B. Zhang, B. Li, C. Zhang, Q. Xie, and P. Xiao, “Automatic threshold calibration for MVT-Based all digital PET,” in2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–2

    2021

  4. [12]

    Single-line multi-voltage threshold method for scintillation detectors,

    H. Chu, M. Yi, H. S. Shim, and J. S. Lee, “Single-line multi-voltage threshold method for scintillation detectors,”Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 18, no. 06, p. P06021, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Dual-ended readout PET detector based on multivoltage threshold sampling combined with convolutional neural network for energy calculation,

    R. Cheng, M. Sun, F. Wang, D. Mu, Y . Liu, Q. Xie, B. Qiu, X. Chen, and P. Xiao, “Dual-ended readout PET detector based on multivoltage threshold sampling combined with convolutional neural network for energy calculation,”IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Scien...

    2024

  6. [14]

    A novel peak picking multi-voltage threshold digitizer for pulse sampling,

    Y . Ling, A. Qiu, L. Wan, F. Wang, K. Zhu, Y . Zhang, and Q. Xie, “A novel peak picking multi-voltage threshold digitizer for pulse sampling,” IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 248–256, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Hadamard,Lectures on Cauchy’s Problem in Linear Partial Differential Equations

    J. Hadamard,Lectures on Cauchy’s Problem in Linear Partial Differential Equations. Yale University Press, 1923

    1923

  8. [16]

    Definitions and examples of inverse and ill-posed problems,

    S. I. Kabanikhin, “Definitions and examples of inverse and ill-posed problems,”Journal of Inverse and Ill-posed Problems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 317–357, 2008

    2008

  9. [17]

    Regularization of inverse problems,

    C. Clason, “Regularization of inverse problems,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00617

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bertero, P

    M. Bertero, P. Boccacci, and C. De Mol,Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Lecoq, A

    P. Lecoq, A. Gektin, and M. Korzhik,Scintillation and Inorganic Scintillators. Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 1–41

    2016

  12. [20]

    The silicon photomultiplier: fundamentals and applications of a modern solid-state photon detector,

    S. Gundacker and A. Heering, “The silicon photomultiplier: fundamentals and applications of a modern solid-state photon detector,”Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 65, no. 17, p. 17TR01, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    J. M. Lee,Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., ser. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    Approximation theorems and whitney’s embedding,

    A. Mukherjee, “Approximation theorems and whitney’s embedding,” in Differential Topology. Cham: Birkhäuser, 2015, pp. 43–67

    2015

  15. [23]

    The central limit theorem for the poisson shot-noise process,

    J. A. Lane, “The central limit theorem for the poisson shot-noise process,” Journal of applied probability, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 287–301, 1984

    1984

  16. [24]

    Simulation of silicon photomultiplier signals,

    S. Seifert, H. T. Van Dam, J. Huizenga, R. Vinke, P. Dendooven, H. Lohner, and D. R. Schaart, “Simulation of silicon photomultiplier signals,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 3726–3733, 2009

    2009

  17. [25]

    J. F. C. Kingman,Poisson Processes. Oxford University Press, 1992

    1992

  18. [26]

    Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors,

    J. B. Johnson, “Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors,”Physical review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 97–109, 1928

    1928

  19. [27]

    Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors,

    H. Nyquist, “Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors,”Physical review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 110–113, 1928

    1928

  20. [28]

    R. G. Meyer,Noise, Gain and Bandwidth in Analog Design. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, pp. 227–256

    2002

  21. [29]

    On minimum step response rise time of linear low-pass systems under the constraint of a given noise bandwidth,

    H. Chen, “On minimum step response rise time of linear low-pass systems under the constraint of a given noise bandwidth,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 404–406, 1982

    1982

  22. [30]

    Jitter and measurement of jitter,

    G. Anthonys, “Jitter and measurement of jitter,” inTiming Jitter in Time-of-Flight Range Imaging Cameras. Springer, 2021, pp. 55–73

    2021

  23. [31]

    Timing estimation for a filtered poisson process in gaussian noise,

    A. Hero, “Timing estimation for a filtered poisson process in gaussian noise,”IEEE transactions on information theory, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 92–106, 1991

    1991

  24. [32]

    Measurement of energy and timing resolution of very highly pixellated lyso crystal blocks with multiplexed sipm readout for use in a small animal pet/mr insert,

    C. J. Thompson, A. L. Goertzen, P. Kozlowski, F. Retière, G. Stortz, V . Sossi, and X. Zhang, “Measurement of energy and timing resolution of very highly pixellated lyso crystal blocks with multiplexed sipm readout for use in a small animal pet/mr insert,” in2013 IEEE Nuclear ...

    2013

  25. [33]

    Crystal growth and scintillation properties of lso and lyso crystals,

    R. Mao, C. Wu, L. Dai, and S. Lu, “Crystal growth and scintillation properties of lso and lyso crystals,”Journal of crystal growth, vol. 368, pp. 97–100, 2013

    2013

  26. [34]

    Spectra of quantized signals,

    W. R. Bennett, “Spectra of quantized signals,”Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 446–472, 1948

    1948

  27. [35]

    S. M. Kay,Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Volume I: Estimation Theory. Prentice Hall, 1993

    1993

  28. [36]

    Some comments on the detection of gaussian signals in gaussian noise,

    D. Slepian, “Some comments on the detection of gaussian signals in gaussian noise,”IRE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 65–68, 1958

    1958

  29. [37]

    Slepian–bangs formula and cramér– rao bound for circular and non-circular complex elliptical symmetric distributions,

    H. Abeida and J.-P. Delmas, “Slepian–bangs formula and cramér– rao bound for circular and non-circular complex elliptical symmetric distributions,”IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1561– 1565, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Full Slepian–Bangs formula for fisher information on lie groups,

    S. El Bouch, S. Labsir, A. Renaux, J. Vilà-Valls, and E. Chaumette, “Full Slepian–Bangs formula for fisher information on lie groups,” in2024 58th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. IEEE, 2024, pp. 1306–1310

    2024

  31. [39]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. Springer, 2006

    2006

  32. [40]

    Characterization and modeling of crosstalk and afterpulsing in hamamatsu silicon photomultipliers,

    J. Rosado and S. Hidalgo, “Characterization and modeling of crosstalk and afterpulsing in hamamatsu silicon photomultipliers,”Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. P10 031–P10 031, 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    Sipm optical crosstalk amplification due to scintillator crystal: effects on timing performance,

    A. Gola, A. Ferri, A. Tarolli, N. Zorzi, and C. Piemonte, “Sipm optical crosstalk amplification due to scintillator crystal: effects on timing performance,”Physics in medicine and biology, vol. 59, no. 13, pp. 3615–3635, 2014

    2014

  34. [42]

    Parametrization of sipm dynamic range contribution to energy resolution of scintillation light readout,

    B. Couce, F. Gomez, A. Iglesias, and P. Aguiar, “Parametrization of sipm dynamic range contribution to energy resolution of scintillation light readout,” in2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. IEEE, 2008, pp. 3973–3974

    2008

  35. [43]

    A lower bound on pet timing estimation with pulse pileup,

    A. O. Hero, N. H. Clinthorne, and W. L. Rogers, “A lower bound on pet timing estimation with pulse pileup,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 709–712, 1991

    1991

  36. [44]

    Joint amplitude and timing estimation for scintillation pulses in gpu,

    M. Ruiz-Gonzalez, L. Caucci, and L. R. Furenlid, “Joint amplitude and timing estimation for scintillation pulses in gpu,” in2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD). IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–3

    2016

  37. [45]

    On the estimation of a parameter with incomplete knowledge on a nuisance parameter,

    A. Mohammad-Djafari and A. Mohammadpour, “On the estimation of a parameter with incomplete knowledge on a nuisance parameter,” inAIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 735, no. 1. American Institute of Physics, 2004, pp. 533–540

    2004

  38. [46]

    Off-grid doa estimation using alternating block coordinate descent in compressed sensing,

    W. Si, X. Qu, and Z. Qu, “Off-grid doa estimation using alternating block coordinate descent in compressed sensing,”Sensors, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 21 099–21 113, 2015

    2015

  39. [47]

    Block coordinate descent methods of centres for solving block-constrained optimization problems,

    K. Kharfati and A. Roubi, “Block coordinate descent methods of centres for solving block-constrained optimization problems,”Optimization Methods and Software, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 577–601, 2026. 63

    2026

  40. [48]

    Recovery of inter-crystal compton scattering events for sensitivity improvement of sub-250 ps tof-pet detector,

    G. Fu, A. Ivan, and H. Qian, “Recovery of inter-crystal compton scattering events for sensitivity improvement of sub-250 ps tof-pet detector,” in2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD)....

    2016

  41. [49]

    Recovery of inter-detector and inter-crystal scattering in brain pet based on lso and gagg crystals,

    S. Lee, K. Y . Kim, M. S. Lee, and J. S. Lee, “Recovery of inter-detector and inter-crystal scattering in brain pet based on lso and gagg crystals,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 65, no. 19, p. 195005, 2020

    2020

  42. [50]

    Algorithms to identify detector compton scatter in pet modules,

    K. Comanor, P. Virador, and W. Moses, “Algorithms to identify detector compton scatter in pet modules,”IEEE transactions on nuclear science, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 2213–2218, 1996

    1996

  43. [51]

    Detector efficiency and compton scatter in fully 3d pet,

    J. M. Ollinger, “Detector efficiency and compton scatter in fully 3d pet,” IEEE transactions on nuclear science, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1168–1173, 1995

    1995

  44. [52]

    Scintillation properties of lyso crystals,

    T. Kimble, M. Chou, and B. H. Chai, “Scintillation properties of lyso crystals,” in2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, vol. 3. IEEE, 2002, pp. 1434–1437

    2002

  45. [53]

    Bgo as a hybrid scintillator / cherenkov radiator for cost-effective time-of-flight pet,

    S. E. Brunner and D. R. Schaart, “Bgo as a hybrid scintillator / cherenkov radiator for cost-effective time-of-flight pet,”Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 4421–4439, 2017

    2017

  46. [54]

    Characteristics of a gamma-ray detector using a bismuth germanate scintillator,

    K. Okajima, K. Takami, K. Ueda, and F. Kawaguchi, “Characteristics of a gamma-ray detector using a bismuth germanate scintillator,”Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1285–1286, 1982

    1982

  47. [55]

    Optimization of dual mode readout of sensl sipm for tof pet detectors,

    T. Xu, S. Yao, S. Chen, Q. Wei, Y . Liu, and T. Ma, “Optimization of dual mode readout of sensl sipm for tof pet detectors,” in2015 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–4

    2015

  48. [56]

    Energy resolution of small scintillation detectors with sipm light readout,

    M. Grodzicka, M. Moszy´nski, T. Szcz˛ e´sniak, M. Kapusta, M. Szawłowski, and D. Wolski, “Energy resolution of small scintillation detectors with sipm light readout,”Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 8, no. 02, pp. P02 017–P02 017, 2013

    2013

  49. [57]

    Background identification system in meg ii experiment based on high-rate scintillation detector with sipm readout,

    R. Iwai, “Background identification system in meg ii experiment based on high-rate scintillation detector with sipm readout,”Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 12, no. 02, pp. C02 023–C02 023, 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Low power implementation of high frequency sipm readout for cherenkov and scintillation detectors in tof- pet,

    J. W. Cates and W. S. Choong, “Low power implementation of high frequency sipm readout for cherenkov and scintillation detectors in tof- pet,”Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 67, no. 19, p. 195009, 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    Zero crossing determination by linear interpolation of sampled sinusoidal signals,

    G. E. Mog and E. P. Ribeiro, “Zero crossing determination by linear interpolation of sampled sinusoidal signals,” in2004 IEEE/PES Transmis- sion and Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX956). IEEE, 2004, pp. 799–802

    2004

  52. [60]

    Triple energy window scatter correction technique in pet,

    L. Shao, R. Freifelder, and J. S. Karp, “Triple energy window scatter correction technique in pet,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 641–648, 1994

    1994

  53. [61]

    Comparison of energy window choice and parameter implementation in dual energy window scatter correction performance in 3d pet,

    V . Sossi, J. Barney, T. Oakes, and T. Ruth, “Comparison of energy window choice and parameter implementation in dual energy window scatter correction performance in 3d pet,” in1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record, vol. 2. IEEE, 1995, pp. 1060–1063

    1995

  54. [62]

    A doi-dependent extended energy window method to control balance of scatter and true events,

    E. Yoshida, K. Kitamura, K. Shibuya, F. Nishikido, T. Hasegawa, T. Yamaya, C. Lam, N. Inadama, and H. Murayama, “A doi-dependent extended energy window method to control balance of scatter and true events,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2475– 2481, 2008

    2008

  55. [63]

    D-optimum designs for heteroscedastic linear models,

    A. Atkinson and R. Cook, “D-optimum designs for heteroscedastic linear models,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 90, no. 429, pp. 204–212, 1995

    1995

  56. [64]

    The construction of exact d-optimum experimental designs with application to blocking response surface designs,

    A. C. Atkinson and A. N. Donev, “The construction of exact d-optimum experimental designs with application to blocking response surface designs,”Biometrika, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 515–526, 1989

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.