The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2104.07438 · v1 · pith:BTHE6QME · submitted 2021-04-13 · econ.GN · q-fin.EC

Mission Statements in Universities: Readability and performance

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BTHE6QMErecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords readabilityuniversitiesperformanceeffectdeterminefocusinstitutionsmanagement
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The mission statement(s) (MS) is one of the most-used tools for planning and management. Universities worldwide have implemented MS in their knowledge planning and management processes since the 1980s. Research studies have extensively explored the content and readability of MS and its effect on performance in firms, but their effect on public or nonprofit institutions such as universities has not been scrutinized with the same intensity. This study used Gunning's Fog Index score to determine the readability of a sample of worldwide universities' MS and two rankings, i.e., Quacquarelli Symonds World University Ranking and SCImago Institutions Rankings, to determine their effect on performance. No significant readability differences were identified in regions, size, focus, research type, age band, or status. Logistic regression (cumulative link model) results showed that variables, such as universities' age, focus, and size, have more-significant explanatory power on performance than MS readability.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.