Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On growth, buckling, and rupture of aneurysms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.10985 v1 pith:BU3SJJGC submitted 2021-08-24 physics.med-ph

classification physics.med-ph
keywords aneurysmsrupturebucklingsizeaneurysmbuckledgrowtharterial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Aneurysms are localized bulges of arteries, and they can rupture with fatal consequences. Complex mechanobiological factors preclude in vivo testing to assess the rupture risk of an aneurysm, and size based criteria are often used in clinical practice to guide surgical interventions. It is often found that tortuous and buckled aneurysms can exceed in size recommended for surgical intervention, and yet do not rupture. This study addresses why buckled aneurysms exhibit this intriguing behaviour by combining in vitro inflation experiments on hyperelastic tubes with finite element calculations. Using a biologically relevant material model for an arterial wall, we show that buckled aneurysms can grow in size without rupturing under favourable arterial pre-tensions. Stretch reversal phenomenon exhibited by arteries governs whether buckling or bulging occurs first. Exponential stiffening favours the axial propagation of an aneurysm instead of radial growth in size. The choice of failure criteria based on Ogden's strain energy function, Gent's first stretch invariant, and Cauchy stress are discussed. Failure maps incorporating post bifurcation (bulging and buckling) response are constructed to delineate the regimes of growth, buckling and rupture of an aneurysm.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools