Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 197 references

Extracting dominant dynamics about unsteady base flows

T0 review · 0 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For flows whose base state itself changes in time, the standard modal and stability toolkit falls short, and the paper maps the alternatives that still work.

desk verdict A perspective/review that correctly maps the methods for unsteady base flows and honestly flags the base-flow definition problem; no new results, but a useful synthesis that deserves referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24075 v2 pith:BU52D7AY submitted 2025-05-29 physics.flu-dyn

Alec J. Linot , Barbara Lopez-Doriga , Yonghong Zhong , Kunihiko Taira This is my paper
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords unsteadybaseflowsaperiodictransientgrowthnonmodalstabilityanalysisoptimallytime-dependentmodesresolventcausalityfluidflowmodal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the standard methods for extracting dominant flow dynamics—proper orthogonal decomposition, dynamic mode decomposition, linear stability analysis, and resolvent analysis—were built around steady or time-periodic base flows and do not automatically work when the base flow itself evolves aperiodically in time. It reviews the emerging alternatives: data-driven decompositions adapted to transient windows, nonmodal stability analysis with optimal perturbations, optimally time-dependent (OTD) modes, time-varying resolvent variants, causality analysis, and other localized spectral tools. The authors' central call is that the field should build libraries of canonical transient flow systems and study transient growth of perturbations in these flows as systematically as it has been done for steady flows. This matters because pipes with sudden changes in flow rate, stalling airfoils, and forming vortices are exactly the aperiodic cases where analysis guidance is thinnest.

What carries the argument

The central object is the time-dependent linear operator $L[\bar{q}(t)] = \nabla N|_{\bar{q}(t)}$ obtained by linearizing the nonlinear dynamics around the unsteady base flow, together with the fundamental solution operator $A(t) = \prod_{j=1}^{n} e^{L[\bar{q}(j\Delta t)]\Delta t}$ that propagates perturbations forward. The leading singular values of $A(t)$ give the transient growth envelope and the optimal initial perturbation; the evolving orthonormal basis that tracks the dominant directions of growth is the OTD subspace, whose evolution follows $dU_r/dt = L U_r - U_r(U_r^T L U_r - \Phi)$; and time-localized or frequency-domain inverses of the operator define the resolvent variants for unsteady flows. This operator perspective is what ties the reviewed methods together: each approach is a different way of asking where and when perturbations can amplify about a moving base state.

What would settle it

A concrete test is to take an aperiodic flow with a known exact time-varying solution, such as an accelerating or decelerating channel, and compute the optimal transient growth twice: once about the exact solution and once about a temporally filtered approximation of the same field. If the growth envelopes or dominant perturbation shapes differ qualitatively, the base-flow choice controls the conclusions; if they nearly coincide, the modeling caveat is benign in that regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that perturbation dynamics about an unsteady base flow can still be extracted, provided the unsteady base state $\bar{q}(t)$ is chosen deliberately and one of several time-aware frameworks replaces the frozen-time eigendecomposition. The organizing equation is the linearized perturbation equation $dq'(t)/dt = L[\bar{q}(t)] q'(t) + \check{f}(t)$, and the reviewed methods differ mainly in how they treat the forcing $\check{f}(t)$ and how they represent time. Nonmodal stability computes the growth envelope through the fundamental solution operator $A(t)$ and its singular values; OTD mode analysis evolves an orthonormal basis that tracks the most amplified perturbation directions; harmonic, wavelet-based, and space-time resolvent analyses generalize the input-output operator to periodic and aperiodic base flows; and causality methods infer directional interactions with no restriction on the base flow's temporal evolution. The paper also contends that these methods are underused, that the choice of base flow is load-bearing, and that using a time-averaged or filtered base flow is a modeling effort rather than strict adherence to dynamical systems theory.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every flow of interest can be split into an unsteady base state $\bar{q}(t)$ and perturbations $q'(t)$ in a principled way, because the paper itself notes that a filtered or averaged base flow is a modeling choice rather than an exact solution to the Navier-Stokes equations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the field adopts canonical transient base-flow test cases, future methods can be compared on common ground, just as pipe and Couette flows served as standard test beds for steady-state stability studies.
  • Nonmodal and OTD analyses can identify transient amplification in flows where frozen-time eigenanalysis predicts only decay, including accelerating and decelerating channels, vortex-airfoil interactions, and pitching airfoils.
  • Wavelet-based and space-time resolvent analyses can deliver time-localized forcing-response pairs for aperiodic flows, at a computational cost that will motivate the randomized and timestepping accelerations the paper mentions.
  • Causality analyses can build maps of directional interactions among flow components without assuming a stationary base flow, complementing the operator-based methods.
  • Results computed about a time-averaged or filtered base flow should be interpreted as outcomes of a model, so the paper's framing implies that such analyses need explicit checks of convergence, noise, and averaging effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to assemble a benchmark suite of aperiodic flows with known exact time-varying base solutions—such as channel flows with time-varying wall motion—and run nonmodal, OTD, and time-varying resolvent analyses side by side to see whether their growth predictions agree.
  • Because the same base-split issue arises whenever a background state drifts, the paper's framework could transfer to cardiovascular pulsatile flow, atmospheric blocking events, or any climate signal treated as a slow base plus fast perturbations.
  • Comparing the nonmodal growth envelope with OTD-based amplification on the same unsteady flow would test the paper's conditional equivalence claim: the optimal perturbation must lie in the initial OTD subspace for the two answers to coincide.
  • The dimensionality of time-resolved resolvent operators grows with the number of temporal collocation points, so a practical next step is to establish error bounds for randomized and timestepping approximations in aperiodic settings before these methods become routine.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a perspective/review article that surveys methods for extracting dominant flow structures and their dynamics when the base flow is unsteady and aperiodic, rather than steady or periodic. It begins by formulating the perturbation equations about a time-varying base flow, highlighting the role of the forcing term \check f(t) and the subtlety that a filtered or averaged base flow is not an exact solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. The paper then reviews data-driven modal decompositions (POD, SPOD, DMD and their time-localized variants), operator-based methods (nonmodal stability analysis, optimally time-dependent (OTD) modes, and harmonic, wavelet-based, and space-time resolvent analyses), causality analysis (Granger and information-theoretic), and other approaches (wavelets, network-based techniques, Hilbert-Huang transform). A summary table (Table 1) lists the typical inputs and computational considerations of each method. The central thesis, stated in Section 3.2, is that aperiodic flows are understudied and that the community should develop libraries of canonical transient flow systems and investigate transient growth in these flows. The paper concludes by acknowledging the omission of deep learning methods and calling for expanded use and further development of the reviewed techniques.

Significance. If the paper's assessment is correct, it serves an important community function by consolidating a disparate literature and identifying a concrete research direction: the construction of benchmark problems for aperiodic and transient base flows. The strengths of the paper include its honest treatment of the base-flow definition problem (Section 2.2), where the authors clearly state that non-exact base flows turn the analysis into a modeling effort beyond strict dynamical systems theory; the recognition of computational costs and trade-offs between matrix-based and matrix-free approaches; and the explicit self-identification of missing topics such as deep learning. The paper does not present new mathematical results or machine-checked code, but it is a well-scoped perspective that makes falsifiable predictions only in the weak sense of calling for future benchmark development. The methods surveyed are all published in peer-reviewed venues and are described with appropriate caveats, and the review appears to materially represent the state of the art. The main value is in the synthesis and the call to action, which is likely to be useful to researchers entering this area.

minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 3.2, after Eq. (13)] In the text following Eq. (13), the statement that the transient growth is simply the leading singular value G(t) = σ1 of A(t) is inconsistent with the definition of G(t) as a ratio of squared norms; the maximum of that ratio is σ1^2, not σ1. Please correct the sentence to G(t) = σ1^2.
  2. [Section 3.4.1, Eq. (33)] The block matrix shown in Eq. (33) does not display the off-diagonal blocks in the lower-left corner, making it difficult to verify that the matrix has the claimed Toeplitz structure. Please add the missing entries or use a more explicit notation, such as defining the entries T_{k,n} = ikωδ_{k,n} - \hat L_{k-n}.
  3. [Section 3.3, Eq. (27)] The definition of the initial perturbation q'_{01}(t) is unclear: \hat Y_r(t0)^T \hat y_1(t) appears to have incompatible dimensions, and the normalization of q'_{01} is not specified. Please clarify the formula so that the ratio g1(t) is well-defined and consistent with the preceding text.
  4. [Section 3.4.1, after Eq. (31)] The subsets Ω_b and Ω_f are defined using m ∈ Z and r ∈ Z, but a set indexed by all integers would be infinite. Please use nonnegative integers or an explicit finite range, e.g., m ∈ {0,1,...,M}.
  5. [Section 3.4.2, Eq. (38)] There is a parenthesis mismatch in the notation \tilde H_{t(η,ξ))}; it should be \tilde H_{t(η,ξ)}. Please fix the typographical error.
  6. [Section 2.1, after Eq. (9)] The phrase 'the eigenvector with the largest real eigenvalue' should be 'the eigenvector whose eigenvalue has the largest real part,' since eigenvalues are generally complex. Please revise the wording.
  7. [Section 3.2, Eq. (12)] The product formula for A(nΔt) is exact only when L is piecewise constant over each interval. The text does call it a numerical approximation, but a brief clarifying comment would help avoid ambiguity for readers who might mistake it for the exact fundamental solution of a continuously time-varying system.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a perspective/review with no fitted predictions or derivation chains that reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

This is a perspective/review paper, not a methods or prediction paper. The central claim is the call to action in Section 3.2: 'Given the low number of studies on aperiodic flows, there is a strong need to develop libraries of canonical transient flow systems and begin investigating the transient growth of perturbations in these flows.' That claim is an editorial synthesis of the surveyed literature, not a derived result. The mathematical content, Equations (1)-(5), is a standard Taylor-series decomposition of the Navier-Stokes equations about a time-varying base state; no quantity is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction. The OTD, nonmodal, resolvent, and causality methods are presented as externally published techniques, with the paper explicitly noting their inputs, assumptions, and computational costs in Table 1 and Section 3. The authors' self-citations (e.g., [44], [102], [129], [138]) are used as literature examples of prior applications of these methods, not as load-bearing justifications for a uniqueness claim or as substitutes for derivation. The paper also explicitly flags the main limitation of the framework in Section 2.2: 'Unless the unsteady base flow is an exact solution to the NSE, care must be taken to ensure that the correct insights are extracted from the dataset' and 'the use of non-exact solutions should always be treated as a model beyond strict adherence to the dynamical systems theory.' This candid scoping prevents any hidden circularity in the review's own argument. No self-definitional reduction, fitted-input-called-prediction step, or self-citation chain that forces the conclusion was found. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes a review, so its central perspective rests on standard perturbation theory and on the fidelity of the cited methods. It introduces no free parameters or new postulated entities.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A flow field can be decomposed into a time-varying base flow and perturbations, q(t) = q̄(t) + q'(t).
    Used at eqs. (2)-(4) and by every reviewed method. The paper acknowledges the challenge of choosing the base flow in §2.2.
  • domain assumption Perturbations are small enough that the linearized operator L[q̄(t)] dominates their evolution.
    Eqs. (4), (10), (17); used by nonmodal, OTD, and resolvent methods. The paper notes nonlinear effects can be included via forcing or nonlinear nonmodal analysis.
  • standard math The fundamental solution operator can be approximated by products of matrix exponentials (eq. 12).
    Standard numerical approximation for time-varying linear systems; underlies transient-growth computations in §3.2.
  • domain assumption The reviewed methods are represented faithfully from the cited literature.
    The review's perspective depends on the accuracy of its summaries of OTD, resolvent, causality, etc.; no new implementations are provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extracting dominant dynamics about unsteady base flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BU52D7AY

@misc{pith2026250524075,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extracting dominant dynamics about unsteady base flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BU52D7AY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24075}
}
read the original abstract

A wide range of techniques exist for extracting the dominant flow dynamics and features about steady, or periodic base flows. However, there have been limited efforts in extracting the dominant dynamics about unsteady, aperiodic base flow. These flows appear in many applications such as when there is a sudden change in the flow rate through a pipe, when an airfoil experiences stall, or when a vortex forms. For these unsteady flows, it is valuable to know not only the dynamics of the base flow but also the features that form around this base flow. Here, we discuss the current state of research on extracting important flow structures and their dynamics in such cases with time-varying base flows. In particular, we consider data-driven decompositions, operator-based methods, causality analysis, and some other approaches. We also offer an outlook and call attention to key areas that require future efforts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24075 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Perturbation dynamics about (left) steady and (right) unsteady base flows. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Temporal evolution of the leading conditional space–time POD mode in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) growth of an initial perturbation due to nonnormality and due to a time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The evolution of the base flow q¯(t) and the optimally time-dependent (OTD) subspace spanned by the two most amplified direction uˆ1(t) and uˆ2(t) for an example of the R¨ossler system [102]. (b) Time-varying base flow and the leading OTD mode for vortex-airfoil in…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a,c,e,g) Schematics of standard, harmonic, wavelet-based, and space-time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Temporal evolutions of two signals ξ1(t) and ξ2(t), and the influence of previous information about ξ2 on estimation of the future state of ξ1 (assuming that there is in fact causation from ξ2 to ξ1); (b) primary causal interactions between the large-scale coherent…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

197 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. J. Holmes, J. L. Lumley, G. Berkooz, and C. W. Rowley. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry . Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2012

    2012

  2. [2]

    Berkooz, P

    G. Berkooz, P. Holmes, and J. L. Lumley. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 25(1):539–575, 1993

    1993

  3. [3]

    J. N. Kutz, S. L. Brunton, B. W. Brunton, and J. L. Proctor. Dynamic mode decomposition: Data-driven modeling of complex systems, 2016

    2016

  4. [4]

    P. J. Schmid. Dynamic mode decomposition and its variants. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 54:225–254, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    Taira, S

    K. Taira, S. L. Brunton, S. T. M. Dawson, C. W. Rowley, T. Colonius, B. J. McKeon, O. T. Schmidt, S. Gordeyev, V. Theofilis, and L. S. Ukeiley. Modal analysis of fluid flows: An overview. AIAA J. , 55(12):4013–4041, 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    Taira, M

    K. Taira, M. S. Hemati, S. L. Brunton, Y. Sun, K. Duraisamy, S. Bagheri, S. T. M. Dawson, and C.-A. Yeh. Modal analysis of fluid flows: Applications and outlook. AIAA J. , 58(3):998–1022, 2020

    2020

  7. [7]

    J. Lumley. The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. Atmospheric turbulence and radio wave propagation , pages 166–178, 1967

    1967

  8. [8]

    Aubry, P

    N. Aubry, P. Holmes, J. L. Lumley, and E. Stone. The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. , 192:115–173, 1988

    1988

Show all 197 references
  1. [9]

    P. J. Schmid. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. J. Fluid Mech. , 656:5–28, 2010

    2010

  2. [10]

    P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson. Stability and Transition in Shear Flows . Springer Verlag, New York, NY, 2001

    2001

  3. [11]

    P. G. Drazin and W. H. Reid. Hydrodynamic stability . Cambridge University Press, 1981

    1981

  4. [12]

    Theofilis

    V. Theofilis. Global linear instability. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 43:319–352, 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    R. D. Joslin and D. N. Miller, editors. Fundamentals and applications of modern flow control. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009

    2009

  6. [14]

    L. N. Trefethen, A. E. Trefethen, S. C. Reddy, and T. A. Driscoll. Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues. Science, 261(5121):578–584, 1993

    1993

  7. [15]

    M. R. Jovanovi´ c and B. Bamieh. Componentwise energy amplification in channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. , 534:145–183, 2005

    2005

  8. [16]

    B. J. McKeon and A. S. Sharma. A critical-layer framework for turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. , 658:336–382, 2010

    2010

  9. [17]

    G. Floquet. Sur les ´ equations diff´ erentielles lin´ eaires ` a coefficients p´ eriodiques. Annales de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure, 12(1883):47–88, 1883. REFERENCES 30

  10. [18]

    L. Perko. Differential equations and dynamical systems, volume 7. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  11. [19]

    D. W. Jordan and P. Smith. Nonlinear ordinary differential equations: an introduction to dynamical systems, volume 2. Oxford University Press, USA, 1999

    1999

  12. [20]

    Greenblatt and E

    D. Greenblatt and E. A. Moss. Rapid temporal acceleration of a turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. , 514:65–75, 2004

    2004

  13. [21]

    T. K. Sengupta, T. T. Lim, Sharanappa V. Sajjan, S. Ganesh, and J. Soria. Accelerated flow past a symmetric aerofoil: experiments and computations. J. Fluid Mech., 591:255–288, 2007

    2007

  14. [22]

    Moin, T.-H

    P. Moin, T.-H. Shih, D. M. Driver, and N. N. Mansour. Direct numerical simulation of a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids , 2:1846–1853, 1990

    1990

  15. [23]

    Lozano-Dur´ an, M

    A. Lozano-Dur´ an, M. G. Giometto, G. I. Park, , and P. Moin. Non-equlibrium three-dimensional boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers.J. Fluid Mech., 883:A20, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    C. P. K. Dagadu, Z. Stegowski, B. J. A. Y. Sogbey, and S. Y. Adzaklo. Mixing analysis in a stirred tank using computational fluid dynamics. J. Appl. Math. Phys., 3(6):685–694, 2015

    2015

  17. [25]

    S. Zhou, Q. Yang, L. Lu, D. Xia, W. Zhang, and H. Yan. CFD analysis of sine baffles on flow mixing and power consumption in stirred tank. Applied Sciences, 12(11):5743, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    W. J. McCroskey. The phenomenon of dynamic stall. NASA TM 81264 , 1981

    1981

  19. [27]

    Krishnamurthy

    V. Krishnamurthy. Predictability of weather and climate.Earth and Space Science, 6(7):1043–1056, 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Kautz, O

    L.-A. Kautz, O. Martius, S. Pfahl, J. G. Pinto, A. M. Ramos, P. M. Sousa, and T. Woollings. Atmospheric blocking and weather extremes over the Euro-Atlantic sector – a review. Weather and Climate Dynamics , 3(1):305–336, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    S. F. Shen. Some considerations on the laminar stability of time-dependent basic flows. J. Aerosp. Sci. , 28(5):397–404, 1961

    1961

  22. [30]

    W. D. Smyth and W. R. Peltier. Three-dimensionalization of barotropic vortices on the f-plane. J. Fluid Mech. , 265:25–64, 1994

    1994

  23. [31]

    J. Serrin. On the stability of viscous fluid motions. Archive for Rat. Mech. and Anal., 3(1):1–13, 1959

    1959

  24. [32]

    D. D. Joseph. Stability of Fluid Motions I . Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1976

    1976

  25. [33]

    P. W. Conrad and W. O. Criminale. The stability of time-dependent laminar flow: Parallel flows. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. , 16(2):233–254, 1965

    1965

  26. [34]

    Kawahara, M

    G. Kawahara, M. Uhlmann, and L. van Veen. The significance of simple invariant solutions in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 44(1):203–225, 2012. REFERENCES 31

    2012

  27. [35]

    ˚Akervik, L

    E. ˚Akervik, L. Brandt, D. S. Henningson, J. Hœpffner, O. Marxen, and P. Schlatter. Steady solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations by selective frequency damping. Phys. Fluids , 18(6):068102, 2006

    2006

  28. [36]

    Beneddine, R

    S. Beneddine, R. Yegavian, D. Sipp, and B. Leclaire. Unsteady flow dynamics reconstruction from mean flow and point sensors: an experimental study. J. Fluid Mech., 824:174–201, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    Schlichting and K

    H. Schlichting and K. Gersten. Boundary-Layer Theory. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 9th edition, 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    G. K. Batchelor. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics . Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  31. [39]

    C.-M. Liu. Complete solutions to extended Stokes’ problems. Math. Prob. in Engineering, 2008:754262, 2008

    2008

  32. [40]

    Majdalani

    J. Majdalani. Exact Navier-Stokes solution for the pulsatory viscous channel flow with arbitrary pressure gradient. J. Prop. and Power , 24(6):1412–1423, 2008

    2008

  33. [41]

    J. R. Womersley. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J. Physiology, 127(3):553– 563, 1955

    1955

  34. [42]

    C. Fan. Non-steady, viscous, incompressible flow in cylindrical and rectangular conduits (with emphasis on periodically oscillating flow) . PhD thesis, 1964

    1964

  35. [43]

    Urbanowicz, A

    K. Urbanowicz, A. Bergant, M. Stosiak, A. Deptu la, and M. Karpenko. Navier- Stokes solutions for accelerating pipe flow – a review of analytical models. Energies, 16(3), 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    A. J. Linot, P. J. Schmid, and K. Taira. On the laminar solutions and stability of accelerating and decelerating channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. , 999:A43, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Van Dyke

    M. Van Dyke. Perturbation methods in fluid mechanics. Parabolic Press, Stanford, Calif, annotated edition, 1975

    1975

  38. [46]

    Bar-Lev and H

    M. Bar-Lev and H. T. Yang. Initial flow field over an impulsively started circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. , 72(4):625–647, 1975

    1975

  39. [47]

    L. Chien. Impulsively started viscous flow over a circular cylinder . Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 1977

    1977

  40. [48]

    W. C. Reynolds and A. K. M. F. Hussain. The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. part 3. theoretical models and comparisons with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. , 54(2):263–288, 1972

    1972

  41. [49]

    A. M. Edstrand, T. B. Davis, P. J. Schmid, K. Taira, and L. N. Cattafesta. On the mechanism of trailing vortex wandering. J. Fluid Mech. , 801:R1, 2016

    2016

  42. [50]

    M. D. Graham and D. Floryan. Exact coherent states and the nonlinear dynamics of wall-bounded turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 53(1):227–253, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    M. Nagata. Three-dimensional finite-amplitude solutions in plane Couette flow: Bifurcation from infinity. J. Fluid Mech. , 217:519–527, 1990. REFERENCES 32

    1990

  44. [52]

    F. Waleffe. Three-dimensional coherent states in plane shear flows. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:4140–4143, 1998

    1998

  45. [53]

    F. Waleffe. Exact coherent structures in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech., 435:93–102, 2001

    2001

  46. [54]

    Kawahara and S

    G. Kawahara and S. Kida. Periodic motion embedded in plane Couette turbulence: regeneration cycle and burst. J. Fluid Mech. , 449:291–300, 2001

    2001

  47. [55]

    J. F. Gibson, J. Halcrow, and P. Cvitanovi´ c. Visualizing the geometry of state space in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. , 611:107–130, 2008

    2008

  48. [56]

    Viswanath

    D. Viswanath. Recurrent motions within plane Couette turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 580:339–358, 2007

    2007

  49. [57]

    A. J. Linot and M. D. Graham. Dynamics of a data-driven low-dimensional model of turbulent minimal Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. , 973:A42, 2023

    2023

  50. [58]

    F. Waleffe. Homotopy of exact coherent structures in plane shear flows. Physics of Fluids , 15(6):1517–1534, 06 2003

    2003

  51. [59]

    J. S. Park and M. D. Graham. Exact coherent states and connections to turbulent dynamics in minimal channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. , 782:430–454, 2015

    2015

  52. [60]

    Shekar and M

    A. Shekar and M. D. Graham. Exact coherent states with hairpin-like vortex structure in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. , 849:76–89, 2018

    2018

  53. [61]

    Faisst and B

    H. Faisst and B. Eckhardt. Traveling waves in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 91:224502, Nov 2003

    2003

  54. [62]

    Wedin and R

    H. Wedin and R. R. Kerswell. Exact coherent structures in pipe flow: travelling wave solutions. J. Fluid Mech. , 508:333–371, 2004

    2004

  55. [63]

    Halcrow, J

    J. Halcrow, J. F. Gibson, P. Cvitanovi´ c, and D. Viswanath. Heteroclinic connections in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. , 621:365–376, 2009

    2009

  56. [64]

    B. F. Farrell and A. M. Moore. An adjoint method for obtaining the most rapidly growing perturbation to oceanic flows. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 22(4):338 – 349, 1992

    1992

  57. [65]

    Martini, A

    E. Martini, A. V. G. Cavalieri, P. Jordan, A. Towne, and L. Lesshafft. Resolvent- based optimal estimation of transitional and turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech., 900, 2020

    2020

  58. [66]

    Noack, K

    B.R. Noack, K. Afanasiev, M. Morzy´ nski, G. Tadmor, and F. Thiele. A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech., 497:335–363, 2003

    2003

  59. [67]

    O. T. Schmidt and P. J. Schmid. A conditional space–time POD formalism for intermittent and rare events: example of acoustic bursts in turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech., 867, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    Frame and A

    P. Frame and A. Towne. Space-time POD and the Hankel matrix. PLOS ONE , 18(8):e0289637, 2023

    2023

  61. [69]

    Borra, Z

    A. Borra, Z. Flynn, A. Goza, and T. Saxton-Fox. Intrinsic phase-based proper orthogonal decomposition (IPhaB POD): A method for physically interpretable modes in near-periodic systems. J. Fluid Mech. , 1002:A18, 2024. REFERENCES 33

    2024

  62. [70]

    S. V. Gordeyev and F. O. Thomas. A temporal proper decomposition (TPOD) for closed-loop flow control. Exp. Fluids , 54(6):1477, 2013

    2013

  63. [71]

    Towne, O

    A. Towne, O. T. Schmidt, and T. Colonius. Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis. J. Fluid Mech. , 847:821–867, 2018

    2018

  64. [72]

    O. T. Schmidt and T. Colonius. Guide to Spectral Proper Orthogonal Decomposition. AIAA J. , 58(3):1023–1033, 2020

    2020

  65. [73]

    Heidt and T

    L. Heidt and T. Colonius. Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition of harmonically forced turbulent flows. J. Fluid. Mech. , 985:A42, 2024

    2024

  66. [74]

    P. J. Schmid and J. Sesterhenn. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. In 61st Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics. American Physical Society, 2008

    2008

  67. [75]

    J. N. Kutz, X. Fu, and S. L. Brunton. Multi-resolution dynamic mode decomposition. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems , 15(2):713–735, 2016

    2016

  68. [76]

    Zhang, C

    H. Zhang, C. W. Rowley, E. A. Deem, and L. N. Cattafesta. Online dynamic mode decomposition for time-varying systems. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 18(3):1586–1609, 2019

    2019

  69. [77]

    Y. Ohmichi. Variational mode decomposition–based nonstationary coherent structure analysis for spatiotemporal data. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. , 149:109162, 2024

    2024

  70. [78]

    P. J. Schmid. Nonmodal stability theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 39:129–62, 2007

    2007

  71. [79]

    Chang, R.-L

    Y.-J. Chang, R.-L. Chern, and Y.-J. Chou. Transient instability in long, tilted water columns with fast-settling, particle-laden layers. J. Fluid Mech. , 929:A42, 2021

    2021

  72. [80]

    Nastro, J

    G. Nastro, J. Fontane, and L. Joly. Optimal growth over a time-evolving variable- density jet at Atwood number |At| = 0.25. J. Fluid Mech. , 936:A15, 2022

    2022

  73. [81]

    K. M. Butler and B. F. Farrell. Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow. Phys. Fluids A , 4(8):1637–1650, 08 1992

    1992

  74. [82]

    S. C. Reddy and D. S. Henningson. Energy growth in viscous channel flows. J. Fluid Mech., 252:209–238, 1993

    1993

  75. [83]

    P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson. Optimal energy density growth in Hagen–Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. , 277:197–225, 1994

    1994

  76. [84]

    Barkley, H

    D. Barkley, H. M. Blackburn, and S. J. Sherwin. Direct optimal growth analysis for timesteppers. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids , 57(9):1435–1458, 2008

    2008

  77. [85]

    Corbett and A

    P. Corbett and A. Bottaro. Optimal perturbations for boundary layers subject to stream-wise pressure gradient. Phys. Fluids , 12(1):120–130, 01 2000

    2000

  78. [86]

    P. Luchini. Reynolds-number-independent instability of the boundary layer over a flat surface: optimal perturbations. J. Fluid Mech. , 404:289–309, 2000. REFERENCES 34

    2000

  79. [87]

    Monokrousos, E

    A. Monokrousos, E. ˚Akervik, L. Brandt, and D. S. Henningson. Global three- dimensional optimal disturbances in the Blasius boundary-layer flow using time- steppers. J. Fluid Mech. , 650:181–214, 2010

    2010

  80. [88]

    D. Biau. Transient growth of perturbations in Stokes oscillatory flows. J. Fluid Mech., 794:R4, 2016

    2016

  81. [89]

    D. Xu, B. Song, and M. Avila. Non-modal transient growth of disturbances in pulsatile and oscillatory pipe flows. J. Fluid Mech. , 907:R5, 2021

    2021

  82. [90]

    Mor´ on, D

    D. Mor´ on, D. Feldmann, and M. Avila. Effect of waveform on turbulence transition in pulsatile pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. , 948:A20, 2022

    2022

  83. [91]

    Abdessemed, A

    N. Abdessemed, A. S. Sharma, S. J. Sherwin, and V. Theofilis. Transient growth analysis of the flow past a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids , 21(4):044103, 04 2009

    2009

  84. [92]

    X. Mao, T. A. Zaki, S. J. Sherwin, and H. M. Blackburn. Transition induced by linear and nonlinear perturbation growth in flow past a compressor blade. J. Fluid Mech., 820:604–632, 2017

    2017

  85. [93]

    Nayak and D

    A. Nayak and D. Das. Transient growth of optimal perturbation in a decaying channel flow. Phys. Fluids , 29(6):064104, 06 2017

    2017

  86. [94]

    Arratia, C

    C. Arratia, C. P. Caulfield, and J.-M. Chomaz. Transient perturbation growth in time-dependent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. , 717:90–133, 2013

    2013

  87. [95]

    J. P. Parker, C. J. Howland, C. P. Caulfield, and R. R. Kerswell. Optimal perturbation growth on a breaking internal gravity wave.J. Fluid Mech., 925:A16, 2021

    2021

  88. [96]

    L´ opez-Zazueta, J

    A. L´ opez-Zazueta, J. Fontane, and L. Joly. Optimal perturbations in time-dependent variable-density Kelvin–Helmholtz billows. J. Fluid Mech. , 803:466–501, 2016

    2016

  89. [97]

    R. R. Kerswell. Nonlinear nonmodal stability theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 50(1):319–345, 2018

    2018

  90. [98]

    Cherubini, P

    S. Cherubini, P. De Palma, J.-Ch. Robinet, and A. Bottaro. Rapid path to transition via nonlinear localized optimal perturbations in a boundary-layer flow. Phys. Rev. E , 82:066302, Dec 2010

    2010

  91. [99]

    C. C. T. Pringle and R. R. Kerswell. Using nonlinear transient growth to construct the minimal seed for shear flow turbulence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:154502, Oct 2010

    2010

  92. [100]

    Monokrousos, A

    A. Monokrousos, A. Bottaro, L. Brandt, A. Di Vita, and D. S. Henningson. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and the optimal path to turbulence in shear flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 106:134502, Mar 2011

    2011

  93. [101]

    Frame and A

    P. Frame and A. Towne. Beyond optimal disturbances: a statistical framework for transient growth. J. Fluid Mech. , 983:A2, 2024

    2024

  94. [102]

    Zhong, A

    Y. Zhong, A. Amiri-Margavi, H. Babaee, and K. Taira. Optimally time-dependent modes of vortex gust-airfoil interactions. J. Fluid Mech. , 1006:A18, 2025. REFERENCES 35

    2025

  95. [103]

    Babaee and T

    H. Babaee and T. P. Sapsis. A minimization principle for the description of modes associated with finite-time instabilities. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. , 472(2186):20150779, 2016

    2016

  96. [104]

    Kern, P.S

    J.S. Kern, P.S. Negi, A. Hanifi, and D.S. Henningson. Onset of absolute instability on a pitching aerofoil. J. Fluid Mech. , 988:A8, 2024

    2024

  97. [105]

    H. Babaee. An observation-driven time-dependent basis for a reduced description of transient stochastic systems. Proc. R. Soc. A. , 475(2231):20190506, 2019

    2019

  98. [106]

    Blanchard and T

    A. Blanchard and T. P. Sapsis. Analytical description of optimally time-dependent modes for reduced-order modeling of transient instabilities. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 18(2):1143–1162, 2019

    2019

  99. [107]

    J. S. Kern, M. Beneitez, A. Hanifi, and D. S. Henningson. Transient linear stability of pulsating Poiseuille flow using optimally time-dependent modes.J. Fluid Mech., 927:A6, 2021

    2021

  100. [108]

    Beneitez, Y

    M. Beneitez, Y. Duguet, P. Schlatter, and D. S. Henningson. Instability of the optimal edge trajectory in the Blasius boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. , 971:A42, 2023

    2023

  101. [109]

    Blanchard, S

    A. Blanchard, S. Mowlavi, and T. P Sapsis. Control of linear instabilities by dynamically consistent order reduction on optimally time-dependent modes. Nonlinear Dyn., 95:2745–2764, 2019

    2019

  102. [110]

    Blanchard and T

    A. Blanchard and T. P. Sapsis. Stabilization of unsteady flows by reduced-order control with optimally time-dependent modes. Phys. Rev. Fluids , 4(5):053902, 2019

    2019

  103. [111]

    M. H. Naderi and H. Babaee. Adaptive sparse interpolation for accelerating non- linear stochastic reduced-order modeling with time-dependent bases. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 405:115813, 2023

    2023

  104. [112]

    Donello, M

    M. Donello, M. H Carpenter, and H. Babaee. Computing sensitivities in evolutionary systems: a real-time reduced order modeling strategy. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 44(1):A128–A149, 2022

    2022

  105. [113]

    Amiri-Margavi and H

    A. Amiri-Margavi and H. Babaee. Time-dependent low-rank input-output operator for forced linearized dynamics with unsteady base flows. J. Fluid Mech. , 1001:A22, 2024

    2024

  106. [114]

    A. G. Nouri, H. Babaee, P. Givi, H. K. Chelliah, and D. Livescu. Skeletal model reduction with forced optimally time dependent modes. Combust Flame , 235:111684, 2022

    2022

  107. [115]

    Ramezanian, A

    D. Ramezanian, A. G. Nouri, and H. Babaee. On-the-fly reduced order modeling of passive and reactive species via time-dependent manifolds. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. , 382:113882, 2021

    2021

  108. [116]

    S. J. Illingworth, J. P. Monty, and I. Marusic. Estimating large-scale structures in wall turbulence using linear models. J. Fluid Mech. , 842:146–162, 2018. REFERENCES 36

    2018

  109. [117]

    H. J. Bae, S. T. M. Dawson, and B. J. McKeon. Resolvent-based study of compressibility effects on supersonic turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. , 883:A29, 2020

    2020

  110. [118]

    L. I. Abreu, A. V. Cavalieri, R. Schlatter, P.and Vinuesa, and D. S. Henningson. Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and resolvent analysis of near-wall coherent structures in turbulent pipe flows. J. Fluid Mech. , 900, 2020

    2020

  111. [119]

    B. J. McKeon. The engine behind (wall) turbulence: perspectives on scale interactions. J. Fluid Mech. , 817:P1, 2017

    2017

  112. [120]

    Yeh and K

    C.-A. Yeh and K. Taira. Resolvent-analysis-based design of airfoil separation control. J. Fluid Mech. , 867:572–610, 2019

    2019

  113. [121]

    Chavarin and M

    A. Chavarin and M. Luhar. Resolvent analysis for turbulent channel flow with riblets. AIAA J. , 58(2):589–599, 2020

    2020

  114. [122]

    M. R. Jovanovi´ c. From bypass transition to flow control and data-driven turbulence modeling: An input–output viewpoint. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 53(1):311–345, 2021

    2021

  115. [123]

    L. V. Rolandi, J. H. M. Ribeiro, C.-A. Yeh, and K. Taira. An invitation to resolvent analysis. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. , 38:603–639, 2024

    2024

  116. [124]

    L. N. Trefethen and M. Embree. Spectra and pseudospectra: the behavior of nonnormal matrices and operators . Princeton University Press, 2005

    2005

  117. [125]

    Symon, K

    S. Symon, K. Rosenberg, S. T. M. Dawson, and B. J. McKeon. Non-normality and classification of amplification mechanisms in stability and resolvent analysis. Phys. Rev. Fluids , 3(5):053902, 2018

    2018

  118. [126]

    A. Zare, M. R. Jovanovi´ c, and T. T. Georgiou. Colour of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 812:636–680, 2017

    2017

  119. [127]

    Rigas, D

    G. Rigas, D. Sipp, and T. Colonius. Nonlinear input/output analysis: application to boundary layer transition. J. Fluid Mech. , 911:A15, 2021

    2021

  120. [128]

    Ballouz, S

    E. Ballouz, S. T. M. Dawson, and H. J. Bae. Transient growth of wavelet-based resolvent modes in the buffer layer of wall-bounded turbulence.Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2753(1):012002, 2024

    2024

  121. [129]

    Lopez-Doriga, E

    B. Lopez-Doriga, E. Ballouz, H. J. Bae, and S. T. M. Dawson. Sparse space–time resolvent analysis for statistically stationary and time-varying flows. J. Fluid Mech., 999:A87, 2024

    2024

  122. [130]

    Herrmann, P

    B. Herrmann, P. J. Baddoo, R. Semaan, S. L. Brunton, and B. J. McKeon. Data- driven resolvent analysis. J. Fluid Mech. , 918:A10, 2021

    2021

  123. [131]

    Padovan, S

    A. Padovan, S. Otto, and C. W. Rowley. Analysis of amplification mechanisms and cross-frequency interactions in nonlinear flows via the harmonic resolvent. J. Fluid Mech., 900:A14, 2020

    2020

  124. [132]

    Padovan and C

    A. Padovan and C. W. Rowley. Analysis of the dynamics of subharmonic flow structures via the harmonic resolvent: Application to vortex pairing in an axisymmetric jet. Phys. Rev. Fluids , 7(7):073903, 2022. REFERENCES 37

    2022

  125. [133]

    W. Wu, C. Meneveau, R. Mittal, A. Padovan, C. W. Rowley, and L. Cattafesta. Response of a turbulent separation bubble to zero-net-mass-flux jet perturbations. Phys. Rev. Fluids , 7(8):084601, 2022

    2022

  126. [134]

    M. R. Islam and Y. Sun. Identification of cross-frequency interactions in compressible cavity flow using harmonic resolvent analysis. J. Fluid Mech. , 1000:A13, 2024

    2024

  127. [135]

    Farghadan, J

    A. Farghadan, J. Jung, R. Bhagwat, and A. Towne. Efficient harmonic resolvent analysis via time stepping. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. , 38:331–353, 2024

    2024

  128. [136]

    Y. Meyer. Wavelets and Operators , volume 1 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1992

    1992

  129. [137]

    Ballouz, B

    E. Ballouz, B. Lopez-Doriga, S. T. M. Dawson, and H. J. Bae. Wavelet-based resolvent analysis for statistically-stationary and temporally-evolving flows. AIAA SciTech Forum, 2023

    2023

  130. [138]

    Ballouz, B

    E. Ballouz, B. Lopez-Doriga, S. T. M. Dawson, and H. J. Bae. Wavelet-based resolvent analysis of non-stationary flows. J. Fluid Mech. , 2024

    2024

  131. [139]

    S. Mallat. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing . Academic Press, 2nd edition, 2001

    2001

  132. [140]

    A.-H. Najmi. Wavelets: A Concise Guide . The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012

    2012

  133. [141]

    Ballouz, S

    E. Ballouz, S. T. M. Dawson, and H. J. Bae. Transient growth and nonlinear breakdown of wavelet-based resolvent modes in turbulent channel flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08670, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Lopez-Doriga, E

    B. Lopez-Doriga, E. Ballouz, H. J. Bae, and S. T. M. Dawson. A sparsity- promoting resolvent analysis for the identification of spatiotemporally-localized amplification mechanisms. AIAA SciTech Forum, page 0677, 2023

    2023

  135. [143]

    C. S. Skene, C.-A. Yeh, P. J. Schmid, and K. Taira. Sparsifying the resolvent forcing mode via gradient-based optimisation. J. Fluid Mech. , 944, 2022

    2022

  136. [144]

    Moarref, A

    R. Moarref, A. S. Sharma, J. A. Tropp, and B. J. McKeon. Model-based scaling of the streamwise energy density in high-Reynolds-number turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech., 734:275–316, 2013

    2013

  137. [145]

    J. H. M. Ribeiro, C.-A. Yeh, and K. Taira. Randomized resolvent analysis. Phys. Rev. Fluids, 5:033902, 2020

    2020

  138. [146]

    Martini, D

    E. Martini, D. Rodr ´ ıguez, A. Towne, and A. V. Cavalieri. Efficient computation of global resolvent modes. J. Fluid Mech. , 919, 2021

    2021

  139. [147]

    Towne, G

    A. Towne, G. Rigas, O. Kamal, E. Pickering, and T. Colonius. Efficient global resolvent analysis via the one-way navier–stokes equations.J. Fluid Mech., 948:A9, 2022

    2022

  140. [148]

    Farghadan, E

    A. Farghadan, E. Martini, and A. Towne. Scalable resolvent analysis for three- dimensional flows. J. Comput. Phys. , 524:113695, 2024. REFERENCES 38

    2024

  141. [149]

    N. Wiener. The Theory of Prediction . 1956

    1956

  142. [150]

    C. W. J. Granger. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross- spectral methods. Econometrica, 37:424––438, 1969

    1969

  143. [151]

    C. E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27:379–423, 1948

    1948

  144. [152]

    Mart ´ ınez-S´ anchez, E

    ´A. Mart ´ ınez-S´ anchez, E. L´ opez, S. Le Clainche, A. Lozano-Dur´ an, A. Srivastava, and R. Vinuesa. Causality analysis of large-scale structures in the flow around a wall-mounted square cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. , 967:A1, 2023

    2023

  145. [153]

    Arranz and A

    G. Arranz and A. Lozano-Dur´ an. Informative and non-informative decomposition of turbulent flow fields. J. Fluid Mech. , 1000:A95, 2024

    2024

  146. [154]

    Lopez-Doriga, M

    B. Lopez-Doriga, M. Atzori, R. Vinuesa, H. J. Bae, A. Srivastava, and S. T. M. Dawson. Linear and nonlinear Granger causality analysis of turbulent duct flows. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 2753:012017, 2024

    2024

  147. [155]

    H. J. Bae, M. P. Encinar, and A. Lozano-Dur´ an. Causal analysis of self-sustaining processes in the logarithmic layer of wall-bounded turbulence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1001:012013, 2018

    2018

  148. [156]

    Lozano-Dur´ an, H

    A. Lozano-Dur´ an, H. J. Bae, and M. P. Encinar. Causality of energy-containing eddies in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. , 882:A2, 2020

    2020

  149. [157]

    Lozano-Dur´ an and G

    A. Lozano-Dur´ an and G. Arranz. Information-theoretic formulation of dynamical systems: Causality, modeling, and control. Phys. Rev. Res. , 4:023195, Jun 2022

    2022

  150. [158]

    Mart ´ ınez-S´ anchez, G

    ´A. Mart ´ ınez-S´ anchez, G. Arranz, and A. Lozano-Dur´ an. Decomposing causality into its synergistic, unique, and redundant components. Nat. Commun., 15:9296, 2024

    2024

  151. [159]

    Ling and A

    Y. Ling and A. Lozano-Dur´ an. Causality between streaks and bursts in wall- bounded turbulence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 2753:012016, 2024

    2024

  152. [160]

    Gunjal, S

    R. Gunjal, S. S. Nayyer, S. R. Wagh, A. M. Stankovic, and N. M. Singh. Granger causality for prediction in dynamic mode decomposition: Application to power systems. Electric Power Systems Research , 225:109865, 2023

    2023

  153. [161]

    M. P. Encinar and J. Jim´ enez. Identifying causally significant features in three- dimensional isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. , 965:A20, 2023

    2023

  154. [162]

    M. P. Encinar. On the growth of localised perturbations in isotropic turbulence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 2753(1):012015, 2024

    2024

  155. [163]

    Daubechies

    I. Daubechies. The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , 36(5):961–1005, 1990

    1990

  156. [164]

    Daubechies

    I. Daubechies. Ten Lectures on Wavelets. SIAM, 1992

    1992

  157. [165]

    Rinoshika and H

    A. Rinoshika and H. Rinoshika. Application of multi-dimensional wavelet transform to fluid mechanics. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. , 10(2):98–115, 2020

    2020

  158. [166]

    Khujadze, D

    G. Khujadze, D. Drikakis, K. Ritos, I. W. Kokkinakis, and S. M. Spottswood. Wavelet analysis of high-speed transition and turbulence over a flat surface. Phys. Fluids, 34(4):046107, 2022. REFERENCES 39

    2022

  159. [167]

    Madhusudanan and R

    A. Madhusudanan and R. R. Kerswell. Predicting burst events in a forced two- dimensional flow: a wavelet-based analysis. J. Fluid Mech. , 1003:A5, 2025

    2025

  160. [168]

    M. E. J. Newman. Networks: an introduction . Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd edition, 2018

    2018

  161. [169]

    M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2):167–256, 2003

    2003

  162. [170]

    S. N. Dorogovtsev. Lectures on Complex Networks . Oxford Univ. Press, 2010

    2010

  163. [171]

    E. Estrada. The Structure of Complex Networks: Theory and Applications . Oxford Univ. Press, 2012

    2012

  164. [172]

    Taira and A

    K. Taira and A. G. Nair. Network-based analysis of fluid flows: Progress and outlook. Prog. Aero. Sci., 131:110823, 2022

    2022

  165. [173]

    Iacobello, L

    G. Iacobello, L. Ridolfi, and S. Scarsoglio. A review on turbulent and vortical flow analyses via complex networks. Physica A, 563:125476, 2021

    2021

  166. [174]

    A. G. Nair and K. Taira. Network-theoretic approach to sparsified discrete vortex dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. , 768:549–571, 2015

    2015

  167. [175]

    Taira, A

    K. Taira, A. G. Nair, and S. L. Brunton. Network structure of two-dimensional decaying isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. , 795:R2, 2016

    2016

  168. [176]

    Gopalakrishnan Meena and K

    M. Gopalakrishnan Meena and K. Taira. Identifying vortical network connectors for turbulent flow modification. J. Fluid Mech. , 915:A10, 2021

    2021

  169. [177]

    A. G. Nair, S. L. Brunton, and K. Taira. Networked-oscillator-based modeling and control of unsteady wake flows. Phys. Rev. E , 97:063107, 2018

    2018

  170. [178]

    Gopalakrishnan Meena, A

    M. Gopalakrishnan Meena, A. G. Nair, and K. Taira. Network community-based model reduction for vortical flows. Physical Review E , 97(6):063103, 2018

    2018

  171. [179]

    Murayama, H

    S. Murayama, H. Kinugawa, I. T. Tokuda, and H. Gotoda. Characterization and detection of thermoacoustic combustion oscillations based on statistical complexity and complex-network theory. Phys. Rev. E , 97:022223, 2018

    2018

  172. [180]

    C.-A. Yeh, M. Gopalakrishnan Meena, and K. Taira. Network broadcast analysis and control of turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. , 910:A15, 2021

    2021

  173. [181]

    Bracewell

    R. Bracewell. The Fourier transform and its applications . McGraw-Hill, 3rd edition, 1999

    1999

  174. [182]

    N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, S. R. Long, M. C. Wu, H. H. Shih, Q. Zheng, N.-C. Yen, C. C. Tung, and H. H. Liu. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 454(1971):903–995, 1998

    1971

  175. [183]

    M. R. Thirumalaisamy and P. J. Ansell. Fast and adaptive empirical mode decomposition for multidimensional, multivariate signals. IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 25(10):1550–1554, 2018

    2018

  176. [184]

    P. J. Ansell and K. Mulleners. Multiscale vortex characteristics of dynamic stall from empirical mode decomposition. AIAA J. , 58(2):600–617, 2020. REFERENCES 40

    2020

  177. [185]

    L. F. de Souza, R. F. Miotto, and W. R. Wolf. Analysis of transient and intermittent flows using a multidimensional empirical mode decomposition. Theo. Comput. Fluid Dyn. , 38:291–311, 2024

    2024

  178. [186]

    S. L. Brunton, B. R. Noack, and P. Koumoutsakos. Machine learning for fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 52:477–508, 2020

    2020

  179. [187]

    G. E. Hinton and R. R. Salakhutdinov. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786):504–507, 2006

    2006

  180. [188]

    Milano and P

    M. Milano and P. Koumoutsakos. Neural network modeling for near wall turbulent flow. J. Comput. Phys. , 182(1):1–26, 2002

    2002

  181. [189]

    Murata, K

    T. Murata, K. Fukami, and K. Fukagata. Nonlinear mode decomposition with convolutional neural networks for fluid dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. , 882:A13, 2020

    2020

  182. [190]

    Floryan and M

    D. Floryan and M. D. Graham. Data-driven discovery of intrinsic dynamics. Nature Machine Intelligence , 4(12):1113–1120, 2022

    2022

  183. [191]

    Smith, K

    L. Smith, K. Fukami, G. Sedky, A. Jones, and K. Taira. A cyclic perspective on transient gust encounters through the lens of persistent homology. J. Fluid Mech., 980:A18, 2024

    2024

  184. [192]

    P. R. Vlachas, W. Byeon, Z. Y. Wan, T. P. Sapsis, and P. Koumoutsakos. Data-driven forecasting of high-dimensional chaotic systems with long short-term memory networks. Proc. R. Soc. A , 474(2213):20170844, 2018

    2018

  185. [193]

    Pathak, B

    J. Pathak, B. Hunt, M. Girvan, Z. Lu, and E. Ott. Model-Free Prediction of Large Spatiotemporally Chaotic Systems from Data: A Reservoir Computing Approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 120(2):24102, 2018

    2018

  186. [194]

    Linot and Michael D

    Alec J. Linot and Michael D. Graham. Deep learning to discover and predict dynamics on an inertial manifold. Phys. Rev. E , 101:062209, 2020

    2020

  187. [195]

    Raissi, P

    M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G.E. Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. , 378:686–707, 2019

    2019

  188. [196]

    Fukami, K

    K. Fukami, K. Fukagata, and K. Taira. Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows with machine learning. J. Fluid Mech. , 870:106–120, 2019

    2019

  189. [197]

    Fukami, K

    K. Fukami, K. Fukagata, and K. Taira. Assessment of supervised machine learning methods for fluid flows. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. , 34(4):497–519, 2020

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.