Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Asymptotic limit of fully coupled multi-scale non-linear stochastic system: the non-autonomous approximation method

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read As the time-scale separation vanishes, a fully coupled multiscale McKean-Vlasov system converges to an averaged equation whose coefficients mix frozen invariant measures over the slow law, with explicit rates.

desk verdict Load-bearing uniqueness claim postponed; otherwise a serious and novel contribution to fully coupled multiscale McKean-Vlasov averaging. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13430 v1 pith:BUFFWIRJ submitted 2024-12-18 math.PR

Yuewen Hou , Yun Li , Longjie Xie This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60F1560H5070K7070K65
keywords multi-scaleMcKean-VlasovSDEsaveragingprinciplenon-autonomousapproximationinvariantmeasureWassersteinspaceKolmogorovequationconvergenceratesHöldercontinuouscoefficients
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper settles, for irregular coefficients, the averaging problem for a two-scale mean-field stochastic system in which the slow and fast components and their distributions all interact. It proves that as the time-scale ratio ε tends to zero the slow process converges to a McKean-Vlasov equation whose drift and diffusion are averaged against a frozen invariant measure, and it identifies the limiting law of the fast process as the mixture of those invariant measures under the law of the slow limit. The rates are $ε^{{α/2}}$ for convergence in law and ε^α in L² for the slow process, where α is the Hölder exponent in the slow variable. The method replaces the nonlinear system by a sequence of linear but non-autonomous two-scale systems, avoiding mean-field PDEs and showing that strong convergence follows from weak convergence.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the non-autonomous approximation method: at each step n the nonlinear system is replaced by a linear non-autonomous two-scale system whose coefficients depend only on the distributions produced by the previous step, so each approximation is a classical SDE. The analysis of these linear systems rests on Kolmogorov equations on Wasserstein space, in particular a forward Kolmogorov equation on the product space P2(Rd1 × Rd2) whose solution decays exponentially in time, together with Poisson-equation estimates and a mollifying approximation on P2 with explicit rates. These estimates control the limit of the fast law and the coefficient differences between successive approximations, and the final limit is obtained by letting the approximation index go to infinity before ε goes to zero.

What would settle it

Construct a system satisfying (H1)-(H2) for which the frozen equation (1.16) has two distinct invariant measures for the same parameters; then the averaged coefficients in (1.15) are not uniquely determined and the equations (1.14) and (1.17) are ambiguous. A direct route is to take a double-well confining potential and an interaction term strong enough to violate the small-κ condition in (1.21), producing the known phase-transition multiplicity for McKean-Vlasov invariant measures.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.3 is the central claim: under non-degeneracy (H1) and dissipativity (H2), with coefficients Hölder-α in the slow space variable and Hölder-β in the fast variable and its law, the slow process X^ε_t converges to the McKean-Vlasov equation (1.14) with averaged coefficients defined in (1.15), and the law of the fast process converges to the mixture E $ζ^{{\bar X_t, L\bar X_t}}$ defined by (1.17). A distinctive feature is that the frozen equation (1.16) is itself a McKean-Vlasov equation, because the fast coefficients depend on the fast law, and the averaged coefficients contain an integral over the slow law of the frozen invariant measures; the paper argues that the formally guessed frozen equation without this integral gives the wrong limit. The paper also claims that the fast-law characterization is new even for classical two-scale Itô SDEs, and that the proof derives strong convergence directly from weak convergence by viewing the nonlinear system as a linear non-autonomous one.

Load-bearing premise

The limit objects are defined through the unique invariant measure of the frozen nonlinear equation (1.16), and the paper states that the proof of this uniqueness is postponed to another article, so the theorem is only as solid as that deferred uniqueness claim.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any fixed horizon, the law of the slow process converges to the law of the averaged McKean-Vlasov equation at rate ε^{α/2} for test functions in C^{(2,α)}_b(P2(Rd1)).
  • Under the extra regularity assumption on σ, the slow process itself converges in mean square at rate ε^α.
  • For every fixed t>0, the law of the fast process converges to the mixture E ζ^{\bar X_t,L\bar X_t} at rate ε^{α/2}+e^{-γ_0 t/ε}, with constants independent of time.
  • The convergence rates depend only on the Hölder exponent α in the slow variables and not on β, the regularity with respect to the fast variables and their distributions.
  • Because the result includes convergence of nonlinear test functions of the fast distribution, it is strictly broader than the classical weak convergence statement for multi-scale Itô SDEs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the proof's mechanism of freezing the distributions to convert a nonlinear system into a linear non-autonomous one suggests that, in other fully coupled mean-field systems where only weak convergence is available, strong convergence may follow by the same freeze-then-average step; the paper does not state this extension.
  • Editorial extension: since the rates are independent of β, one would expect the qualitative averaging limit to persist under very rough fast coefficients; the estimates support this but do not take β to zero.
  • Editorial extension: the mixture formula for the fast law may offer a route to propagation-of-chaos statements for finite-particle two-scale systems, where the empirical fast measure should converge to the same mixture; this is not treated in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a non-autonomous approximation method for the fully coupled multi-scale McKean-Vlasov system (1.1), where the coefficients of both the slow and fast equations depend on the distributions of both components. The main theorem (Theorem 1.3) identifies the averaged coefficients in (1.15) through the invariant measure of the frozen McKean-Vlasov equation (1.16), proves convergence in law of the slow process with rate ε^{α/2}, characterizes the limit of the fast law by (1.17) with rate ε^{α/2}+e^{-γ0 t/ε}, and, under an extra regularity assumption on σ, proves strong convergence of the slow process with rate ε^{α∧1}. The method replaces the non-linear system by a sequence of linear non-autonomous systems, analyzed via Kolmogorov equations on Wasserstein space, Poisson equations with parameters, and a mollification procedure on the space of measures.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper is a substantial advance: it addresses an open problem recorded in [3, Section 7] for fully coupled multi-scale McKean-Vlasov systems, introduces a technique that avoids mean-field PDEs, and provides what appears to be the first characterization of the fast-motion limit for such systems, with rates matching the classical Itô SDE case. The paper contains extensive original technical machinery, including optimal regularity estimates for backward and forward Kolmogorov equations on Wasserstein space, Poisson-equation analysis for measure-dependent coefficients, and quantitative mollification with explicit rates. However, the central theorem is conditional on an unproved uniqueness statement, and one auxiliary pair of lemmas relies on a mutual reference for a key convergence argument. These gaps must be repaired before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 1.3, Remark 1.4(i), Lemma 6.4] Theorem 1.3 and definitions (1.15)-(1.17) are stated in terms of 'the unique invariant measure' ζ^{x,μ} of the frozen McKean-Vlasov equation (1.16). Remark 1.4(i) explicitly postpones the proof of uniqueness, citing [51, Theorem 3.1] and saying the property is not needed in the proof. This is not a cosmetic omission: Lemma 6.4 only constructs an invariant measure as a cluster point of the approximating sequence and verifies the stationary equation, but it does not show that the limit is independent of the approximating sequence or that no other invariant measure exists. Since (H2) includes the small-κ condition (1.21), which is exactly the mechanism that should yield a contraction in the weighted total variation metric, the missing argument is likely repairable; but as it stands, the averaged coefficients \bar b, \bar σ in (1.15) and the fast limit \tilde ζ in (1.17) are not rigorously well-defined objects. The theorem is therefore conditional on a postponed result.
  2. [Lemmas 6.4 and 6.5] The proof of Lemma 6.4 invokes Lemma 6.5 for the α-Hölder regularity of \bar f(x)=∫ f(y)ζ^{x,μ}(dy), in order to control a ρ_V term by ρ_{α,M}(μ_{n-1},μ). Lemma 6.5, in turn, proves the regularity of averaged coefficients by an approximation argument whose convergence step is justified by the phrase 'by exactly the same procedure as in Lemma 6.4'. This creates a mutual reference: the convergence of the fixed-μ approximating measures ζ̂^{x,μ}_n to ζ^{x,μ}, which is the backbone of Lemma 6.5, is not proved in the text, and it is precisely the type of contraction/uniqueness argument that would also supply the missing uniqueness for (1.16). As written, the two lemmas do not independently establish their claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Remark 1.4(i)] The sentence 'since we will not need this property in our proof' is misleading: the theorem statement itself uses uniqueness to define the limit objects, so the property is needed for well-posedness even if it is not used directly in the convergence estimates.
  2. [Notation section] The definition of the spaces C^{(2,α)}_b and C^{(2,β)}_p does not explicitly state that all lower-order functional derivatives are bounded; the proofs, e.g. in Lemma 3.2, rely on boundedness of the first-order derivative. This should be clarified.
  3. [Section 5.3, proof of Theorem 5.1(iii)] The mollification of V on P_2(R^{d1}×R^{d2}) is defined by convolving only the first marginal with ρ_n^2, but Lemma 4.4 is stated for functions on P_2(R^d). The adaptation to product measures and the justification of the resulting estimates need at least a brief explanation.
  4. [Throughout] There are occasional typographical errors, for example 'excepted' where 'expected' is meant in Section 1.1(iii).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No input-output circularity: the averaged coefficients are a genuine frozen-cell construction and no parameter is fitted to the target limits. The only flagged point is a mutual reference between Lemmas 6.4 and 6.5 plus a deferred uniqueness proof for the invariant measure, which are presentation/rigor gaps rather than reductions of the theorem to its inputs.

  1. other [Lemma 6.4 proof and Lemma 6.5 proof, Section 6.2 (arXiv:2412.13430)]
    "and we have by Lemma 6.5 below that \bar f(\tilde x) = \int f(y)\zeta^{\tilde x,\mu}(dy)\in C^\alpha_b. ... Moreover, by exactly the same procedure as in Lemma 6.4, we have \lim_{n\to\infty} W_\vartheta(\hat\zeta^{x,\mu}_n,\zeta^{x,\mu})=0."

    As printed, Lemma 6.4's proof of the key contraction estimate (6.25) invokes Lemma 6.5 for the C^\alpha regularity of the x-averaged invariant measure, while Lemma 6.5's proof of that regularity establishes convergence of the auxiliary invariant measures by 'exactly the same procedure as in Lemma 6.4'. Taken literally, the two lemmas point to each other, so the derivation of the limiting invariant measure and of its regularity is not internally self-contained at this node. This is an organizational/presentational circularity rather than a reduction of the theorem to a fitted input: the fixed-\mu version of the contraction (take \mu_n=\mu in (6.25)) does not require Lemma 6.5 and can break the cycle.

full rationale

The central limit objects (1.15)-(1.17) are defined through the invariant measure of the frozen McKean-Vlasov cell problem, and the convergence rates in Theorem 1.3 are proved from Kolmogorov equations, Poisson equations, and non-autonomous averaging estimates; no parameter is fitted to the \varepsilon-dependent system and no prediction is a renamed input. The Picard-type freezing argument in Section 6 reduces the nonlinear system to linear non-autonomous systems in a genuine way, and the final strong convergence is obtained by applying Theorem 5.1 to the frozen-coefficient version of the original system. There is no self-definitional reduction and no fitted input called a prediction. The paper's own Remark 1.4(i) states that the uniqueness of the invariant measure for (1.18) is postponed and is to be proved 'similarly as in [51, Theorem 3.1]'; this is an admitted hypothesis on which the definition of the limit depends, and it makes the main theorem conditional, but it is not a circular input-output identity because [51] is neither the present paper nor a work by the present authors. The strongest genuinely circular-looking point is the mutual citation between Lemma 6.4 and Lemma 6.5: Lemma 6.4 uses Lemma 6.5 for the regularity of the averaged measure, and Lemma 6.5 says its convergence follows 'by exactly the same procedure as in Lemma 6.4'. That is a presentation gap that should be untangled by exhibiting the fixed-\mu contraction, but it does not make the whole derivation equivalent to its assumptions. Overall the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks in its core analytic estimates, so no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is grounded on standard existence and ergodicity theorems and two structural hypotheses (H1)-(H2). The only unproved input is the uniqueness of the frozen invariant measure, which the authors explicitly defer. There are no fitted parameters or invented entities.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Uniform ellipticity of σ and G ((H1))
    Used throughout Sections 3-5 for heat kernel bounds, Kolmogorov regularity, and existence of densities.
  • domain assumption Dissipativity plus smallness of the measure-coupling constant κ ((H2))
    Ensures tightness, existence of invariant measures, and the κ contraction used in the n→∞ step; small κ also suppresses phase transitions.
  • ad hoc to paper Unique invariant measure for the frozen McKean-Vlasov equation (1.16)
    Theorem 1.3 and definitions (1.15)-(1.17) rely on uniqueness. Remark 1.4(i) says the proof is postponed to another work and only cites [51, Theorem 3.1] as a similar argument.
  • standard math Well-posedness of the nonlinear system (1.1) and of the averaged equation (1.14)
    Invoked via [11, Theorem 3.4, Corollary 3.5] and [23] in Remark 1.4(i); not re-proved.
  • standard math Heat kernel estimates for uniformly elliptic SDEs from [31, Chapter IV]
    Used in Theorem 3.2 and Section 5 to transfer Hölder regularity to Kolmogorov solutions.
  • standard math Exponential ergodicity of parameterized SDEs under (AFG), from [53, Theorem 7.4] or [17, Remark 2.1], and regularity estimates from [52, Theorem 2.1]
    Used in Theorems 3.5 and Lemmas 3.8, 5.4 for the exponential decay terms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymptotic limit of fully coupled multi-scale non-linear stochastic system: the non-autonomous approximation method." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BUFFWIRJ

@misc{pith2026241213430,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymptotic limit of fully coupled multi-scale non-linear stochastic system: the non-autonomous approximation method},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BUFFWIRJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13430}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we develop a novel argument, the non-autonomous approximation method, to seek the asymptotic limits of the fully coupled multi-scale McKean-Vlasov stochastic systems with irregular coefficients, which, as summarized in [3,Section 7], remains an open problem in the field. We provide an explicit characterization for the averaged limit of the non-linear stochastic system, where both the choice of the frozen equation and the definition of the averaged coefficients are more or less unexpected since new integral terms with respect to the measure variable appear. More importantly, in contrast with the classical theory of multi-scale systems which focuses on the averaged limit of the slow process, we propose a new perspective that the asymptotic behavior of the entire system is actually governed by the limit of the fast motion. By studying the long-time estimates of the solution of the Kolmogorov equation in Wasserstein space, we identify the limiting distribution of the fast motion of the non-linear system, which, to the best of our knowledge, is new even for the classical multi-scale It\^o SDEs. Furthermore, rates of convergence are also obtained, which are rather sharp and depend only on the regularity of the coefficients with respect to the slow variable. The innovation of our argument is to transform the non-linear system into a sequence of linear but non-autonomous systems, which is rather simple insofar as it avoids to involve the mean-field type PDEs associated with non-linear stochastic system, and at the same time, it turns out to be quite effective as it enables us to show that the strong convergence in the averaging principle of the non-linear stochastic system follows directly from the weak convergence, which significantly simplified the proof.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Barbu and M

    V. Barbu and M. R¨ ockner: From non-linear Fokker-Planck equa tions to solutions of distribution dependent SDE. Ann. Probab., 48 (2020), 1902–1920

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Z. W. Bezemek and K. Spiliopoulos: Large deviations for interactin g multiscale particle systems. Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 155 (2023), 27–108

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Z. W. Bezemek and K. Spiliopoulos: Rate of homogenization for fully -coupled McKean-Vlasov SDEs. Stoch. Dyna., 23 (2023), 2350013

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Buckdahn, J

    R. Buckdahn, J. Li, S. Peng and C. Rainer: Mean-field stochastic differential equations and associated PDEs. Ann. Probab., 45 (2017), 824–787

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Cardaliaguet, F

    P. Cardaliaguet, F. Delarue, J. M. Lasry, P. L. Lions: The Maste r Equation and the Convergence Problem in Mean Field Games: (AMS-201), Annals of Mathematics Stud ies, Princeton University Press, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Carmona and F

    R. Carmona and F. Delarue: Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Game s with Applications I-II. Springer Nature (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    J. A. Carrillo, R. S. Gvalani, G. A. Pavliotis and A. Schlichting: Long- time behaviour and phase transitions for the Mckean-Vlasov equation on the torus. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 235 (2020), 635–690. 74

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Cattiaux, A

    P. Cattiaux, A. Guillin and F. Malrieu: Probabilistic approach for gra nular media equations in the non uniformly convex case. Prob. Theory Rel. Fields , 140 (2008), 19–40

    work page 2008

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Cerrai and M

    S. Cerrai and M. Freidlin: Averaging principle for stochastic reac tion-diffusion equations. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 144 (2009), 137–177

    2009

  2. [10]

    Chaudru de Raynal: Strong well posedness of McKean-Vla sov stochastic differential equations with H¨ older drift.Stoch

    P.-E. Chaudru de Raynal: Strong well posedness of McKean-Vla sov stochastic differential equations with H¨ older drift.Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 130 (2020), 79–107

    2020

  3. [11]

    Chaudru de Raynal and N

    P.-E. Chaudru de Raynal and N. Frikha: Well-posedness for som e non-linear SDEs and related PDE on the Wasserstein space. J. Math. Pures Appl. , 159 (2022), 1–167

    2022

  4. [12]

    Crisan and E

    D. Crisan and E. McMurray: Smoothing properties of McKean-V lasov SDEs. Probab. Theory Rel. Fields, 171 (2018), 97–148

    2018

  5. [13]

    D. A. Dawson: Critical dynamics and fluctuations for a mean-fie ld model of cooperative behavior. J. Stat. Phys. , 31 (1983), 29–85

    1983

  6. [14]

    M. G. Delgadino, R. S. Gvalani, G. A. Pavliotis and S. A. Smith: Phas e transitions, logarithmic Sobolev inequalities, and uniform-in-time propagation of chaos for weakly interacting diffusions. Com- mun. Math. Phys. , 401 (2023), 275–323

    2023

  7. [15]

    M. G. Delgadino, X. Yan and Y. Yao: Uniqueness and nonuniqueness of steady states of aggregation- diffsion equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 75 (2022), 3–59

    2022

  8. [16]

    M. G. Delgadino, R. S. Gvalani and G. A. Pavliotis: On the diffusive- mean field limit for weakly interacting diffusions exhibiting phase transitions. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 241 (2021), 91–148

    2021

  9. [17]

    Eberle, A

    A. Eberle, A. Guillin and R. Zimmer: Quantitative Harris type theor ems for diffusions and McKean- Vlasov processes. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 371 (2019), 7135–7173

    2019

  10. [18]

    Princeton Univ

    Freidlin M.: Functional integration and partial differential equat ions. Princeton Univ. Press, Prince- ton, N.J., 1985

    1985

  11. [19]

    S. N. Gomes and G. A. Pavliotis: Mean field limits for interacting diffu sions in a two-scale potential. J. Non-linear Sci. , 28 (2018), 905–941

    2018

  12. [20]

    R. S. Gvalania and A. Schlichting: Barriers of the McKean-Vlasov energy via a mountain pass theorem in the space of probability measures. J. Func. Anal. , 279 (2020), 108720

    2020

  13. [21]

    Hairer and X.-M

    M. Hairer and X.-M. Li: Averaging dynamics driven by fractional B rownian motion. Ann. Probab., 48 (2020), 1826–1860

    2020

  14. [22]

    Hairer and E

    M. Hairer and E. Pardoux: Fluctuations around a homogenised s emilinear random PDE. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 239 (2021), 151–217

    2021

  15. [23]

    Hammersley, D

    W. Hammersley, D. ˘Si˘ska and /suppress L. Szpruch: McKean-Vlasov SDE under measure dependent Lyapunov conditions. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist., 57 (2021), 1032–1057

    2021

  16. [24]

    W. Hong, S. Li, W. Liu and X. Sun: Central limit type theorem and la rge deviations for multi-scale McKean-Vlasov SDEs. Probab. Theory Rel. Fields , 187 (2023), 133–201

    2023

  17. [25]

    Hu and K

    W. Hu and K. Spiliopoulos: Hypoelliptic multiscale Langevin diffusions: Large deviations, invariant measures and small mass asymptotics. Electronic J. Probab., 22 (2017), 1–38

    2017

  18. [26]

    Kac: Foundations of kinetic theory

    M. Kac: Foundations of kinetic theory. Proc. 3rd Berkeley Sym pos. Math. Statist. Probability 3, 1956, 171–197

    1956

  19. [27]

    Kifer: Averaging and climate models

    Y. Kifer: Averaging and climate models. Stochastic Climate Models , Progress in Probability book series, Springer 49, (2001) 171–188

    2001

  20. [28]

    H. W. Kang and T. G. Kurtz: Separation of time-scales and mode l reduction for stochastic reaction networks. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 23 (2013), 529–583

    2013

  21. [29]

    R. Z. Khasminskii and G. Yin: On averaging principles: an asympto tic expansion approach. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 35 (2004), 1534–1560

    2004

  22. [30]

    Lions: Mean-field games and applications

    P. Lions: Mean-field games and applications. Lectures at the Co llege de France, 2007

    2007

  23. [31]

    O. A. Lady˘ zenskaja, V. A. Solonnikov and N. N. Ural’ceva : Line ar and Quasi-linear Equations of Parabolic Type. Translated from Russian by S. Smmith, Amercian Mat hematical Society, 1968

    1968

  24. [32]

    Y. Li, F. Wu and L. Xie: Poisson equation on Wasserstein space an d diffusion approximations for multiscale McKean-Vlasov equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 56 (2024), 1495–1524

    2024

  25. [33]

    Liu: Strong convergence of principle of averaging for multisc ale stochastic dynamical systems

    D. Liu: Strong convergence of principle of averaging for multisc ale stochastic dynamical systems. Commun. Math. Sci. , 8 (2010), 999–1020. 75

    2010

  26. [34]

    G. A. Pavliotis and A. M. Stuart: Multiscale methods: averaging a nd homogenization. Texts Appl. Math., vol. 53. Springer, New York, 2008

    2008

  27. [35]

    H. P. McKean: A class of Markov processes associated with non linear parabolic equations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. , 56 (1966), 1907–1911

    1966

  28. [36]

    Mishura and A

    Y. Mishura and A. Veretennikov: Existence and uniqueness theorems for solutions of McKean-Vlasov stochastic equations. Theory Probab. Math. Stat. , 103 (2020), 59–101

    2020

  29. [37]

    Mou and J

    C. Mou and J. Zhang: Wellposedness of second order master eq uations for mean field games with nonsmooth Data. Memoirs Amer. Math. Society , 29 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Otto: The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: the p orous medium equation

    F. Otto: The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: the p orous medium equation. Comm. Partial Diff. Equ. , 26 (2001), 101–174

    2001

  31. [39]

    G. A. Pavliotis and A. M. Stuart: Multiscale methods: averaging a nd homogenization. Texts Appl. Math., Springer, New York, 2008

    2008

  32. [40]

    Pardoux and A

    E. Pardoux and A. Yu. Veretennikov: On the Poisson equation a nd diffusion approximation. I. Ann. Probab., 29 (2001), 1061–1085

    2001

  33. [41]

    Pardoux and A

    E. Pardoux and A. Yu. Veretennikov: On the Poisson equation a nd diffusion approximation 2. Ann. Probab., 31 (2003), 1166–1192

    2003

  34. [42]

    dos Reis, W

    G. dos Reis, W. Salkeld and J. Tugaut: Freidlin-Wentzell LDP in pat h space for McKean-Vlasov equations and the functional iterated logarithm law. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 29 (2019), 1487–1540

    2019

  35. [43]

    R¨ ockner, X

    M. R¨ ockner, X. Sun and Y. Xie: Strong convergence order fo r slow-fast McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist., 57 (2021), 547–576

    2021

  36. [44]

    R¨ ockner and L

    M. R¨ ockner and L. Xie: Diffusion approximation for fully coupled s tochastic differential equations. Ann. Probab., 49 (2021), 1205–1236

    2021

  37. [45]

    R¨ ockner and L

    M. R¨ ockner and L. Xie: Averaging principle and normal deviations for multiscale stochastic systems. Commun. Math. Phys. , 383 (2021), 1889–1937

    2021

  38. [46]

    Sznitman: Topics in propagation of chaos, In: P.-L

    A.-S. Sznitman: Topics in propagation of chaos, In: P.-L. Hennequin, (eds) Ecole d’Et´ e de Proba- bilit´ es de Saint-Flour XIX - 1989. Lecture Notes in Math. , Vol 1464, Springer, Berlin, 1991, 165–251

    1989

  39. [47]

    Tugaut: Convergence to the equilibria for self-stabilizing pro cesses in double well landscape

    J. Tugaut: Convergence to the equilibria for self-stabilizing pro cesses in double well landscape. Ann. Probab., 41 (2010), 1427–1460

    2010

  40. [48]

    Talay and M

    D. Talay and M. Tomasevic: A new McKean-Vlasov stochastic inte rpretation of the parabolic- parabolic Keller-Segel model: The one-dimensional case. Bernoulli, 26 (2020), 1323–1353

    2020

  41. [49]

    A. Yu. Veretennikov: On the averaging principle for systems of stochastic differential equations. Math. USSR Sborn. , 69 (1991), 271–284

    1991

  42. [50]

    Wang: Distribution dependent SDEs for Landau type equa tions

    F.-Y. Wang: Distribution dependent SDEs for Landau type equa tions. Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 128 (2018), 595–621

    2018

  43. [51]

    Wang: Exponential ergodicity for singular reflecting McKe an-Vlasov SDEs

    F.-Y. Wang: Exponential ergodicity for singular reflecting McKe an-Vlasov SDEs. Stoch. Proc. Appl., 160 (2023), 265–293

    2023

  44. [52]

    P. Xia, L. Xie, L. Yang and X. Zhang: Elliptic and parabolic equation s with unbounded coefficients and uniform in time diffusion approximations

  45. [53]

    Xie and X

    L. Xie and X. Zhang: Ergodicity of stochastic differential equat ions with jumps and singular coeffi- cients. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist., 56 (2020), 175–229

    2020

  46. [54]

    Zhang: Existence and non-uniqueness of stationary distrib utions for distribution dependent SDEs

    S. Zhang: Existence and non-uniqueness of stationary distrib utions for distribution dependent SDEs. Electron. J. Probab., 28 (2023), 1–34

    2023

  47. [55]

    Zitridis: Homogenization of conditional slow-fast McKean-Vla sov SDEs

    A. Zitridis: Homogenization of conditional slow-fast McKean-Vla sov SDEs. arXiv: 2308.05874. Yuewen Hou: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Fujian No rmal University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350007, P.R. China, Email: hyw.fjnu@foxmail.com Yun Li: School of Mathematics and Statistics...

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.