Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ClimRetrieve: A Benchmarking Dataset for Information Retrieval from Corporate Climate Disclosures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.09818 v3 pith:BXPVGZRW submitted 2024-06-14 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords retrievalclimatedatasetinformationcommunicationcorporateembeddingsexpert
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To handle the vast amounts of qualitative data produced in corporate climate communication, stakeholders increasingly rely on Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. However, a significant gap remains in evaluating domain-specific information retrieval - the basis for answer generation. To address this challenge, this work simulates the typical tasks of a sustainability analyst by examining 30 sustainability reports with 16 detailed climate-related questions. As a result, we obtain a dataset with over 8.5K unique question-source-answer pairs labeled by different levels of relevance. Furthermore, we develop a use case with the dataset to investigate the integration of expert knowledge into information retrieval with embeddings. Although we show that incorporating expert knowledge works, we also outline the critical limitations of embeddings in knowledge-intensive downstream domains like climate change communication.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Climate Finance Bench

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Climate Finance Bench releases 330 expert-validated QA pairs on 33 climate reports and shows that retrieval quality, not model capacity, is the main accuracy bottleneck.

Pith tools