The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2208.12912 · v1 · pith:BZT6Q2BI · submitted 2022-08-27 · math.MG · math.GT

Two Sufficient Conditions for a Polyhedron to be (Locally) Rupert

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BZT6Q2BIrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification math.MG math.GT
keywords polyhedronrupertconditionsgivenlocalsmallborecall
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Given two cubes of equal size, it is possible - against all odds - to bore a hole through one which is large enough to pass the other straight through. This preposterous property of the cube was first noted by Prince Rupert of the Rhine in the 17th century. Surprisingly, the cube is not alone: many other polyhedra have this property, which we call being Rupert. A concise way to express that a polyhedron is Rupert is to find two orientations $Q$ and $Q'$ of that polyhedron so that $\pi(Q)$ fits inside $\pi(Q')$, with $\pi$ representing the orthogonal projection onto the $xy$-plane. Given this scheme, to bore the hole in $Q'$ we can remove $\pi^{-1}(\pi(Q))$. There is an open conjecture that every convex polyhedron is Rupert. Aiming at this conjecture, we give two sufficient conditions for a polyhedron to be Rupert. Both conditions require the polyhedron to have a particularly simple orientation $Q$, which we alter by a very small amount to get $Q'$ as required above. When a passage is given by a very small alteration like this, we call it a local passage. Restricting to the local case turns out to offer many valuable simplifications. In the process of proving our main theorems, we develop a theory of these local passages, involving an analysis of how small rotations act on simple polyhedra.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A stellated tetrahedron that is probably not Rupert

    math.MG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Numerical sampling indicates a stellated tetrahedron is likely not Rupert, as over 88% of orientation pairs fail to permit passage.