Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Flame-wall interaction of thermodiffusively unstable hydrogen/air flames -- Part I: Characterization of governing physical phenomena

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Thermodiffusively unstable lean hydrogen/air flames quench closer to the wall and drive higher wall heat fluxes than one-dimensional head-on quenching predicts, and the paper traces this to local mixture variation rather than…

desk verdict First 2D DNS of head-on quenching of thermodiffusively unstable lean H2/air flames; the qualitative findings are solid, but the central 'ensemble of 1D HOQs' claim is inferred from correlations rather than directly tested. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17590 v1 pith:BZWIRFNG submitted 2024-11-26 physics.flu-dyn

Max Schneider , Hendrik Nicolai , Vinzenz Schuh , Matthias Steinhausen , Christian Hasse This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords flame-wallinteractionhead-onquenchingthermodiffusiveinstabilityhydrogen/airpremixedflamesdifferentialdiffusionwallheatfluxdistancedirectnumericalsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Lean hydrogen/air flames develop intrinsic thermodiffusive instabilities: hydrogen's fast diffusion wrinkles the flame and locally changes the fuel-air mixture. This paper uses two-dimensional direct numerical simulations of head-on quenching to ask how those unstable flames interact with a cold wall. It finds that, relative to a plain one-dimensional quenching flame at the same unburnt conditions, the unstable flame quenches closer to the wall and deposits more heat into it. The explanation is not the increased flame surface area; it is that instability-driven local enrichment raises the flame's reactivity before it reaches the wall. If correct, single one-dimensional quenching calculations cannot give reliable wall heat fluxes or quenching distances for lean hydrogen systems, and models must resolve the local mixture distribution.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the one-dimensional head-on-quenching curve as a function of equivalence ratio, used as a reference database, together with a streamline diagnostic that tags each flame segment by the maximum equivalence ratio along the local reaction-progress gradient. The authors separate mixture-composition effects from geometric effects with the reactivity factor $I_0 = (s_c/s_{l,\mathrm{ref}})/(A/L_y)$, where $s_c$ is the consumption speed, $s_{l,\mathrm{ref}}$ the reference laminar flame speed, and $A/L_y$ the normalized flame-surface area. The collapse of the two-dimensional quenching statistics onto the one-dimensional curves at varying φ identifies the local mixture variation, induced by differential and preferential diffusion, as the variable that carries the argument.

What would settle it

Measure, in a controlled lean hydrogen/air flame-wall experiment near φ=0.4, 298 K, and 1 atm, the spatiotemporal wall heat flux and the quenching distance along the wall together with a local equivalence-ratio indicator near quenching. If the wall heat flux and quenching distance do not collapse onto one-dimensional head-on-quenching curves for the corresponding local equivalence ratio, or if they match the one-dimensional values at the global φ, the ensemble representation is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the flame-wall interaction of a thermodiffusively unstable lean hydrogen/air flame can be described as an ensemble of one-dimensional head-on quenchings, each at the local equivalence ratio seen by that wall segment. In the two-dimensional simulations at φu=0.4, Tu=298 K, and 1 atm, the quenching Péclet number is lower and the quenching wall heat flux is higher than in the reference one-dimensional head-on quenching, and the scatter in these quantities collapses onto one-dimensional head-on-quenching curves for equivalence ratios roughly between 0.34 and 0.48. The authors show that the local equivalence ratio at one flame thickness from the wall correlates with both quenching distance and heat flux, that the conditioned average wall heat flux follows the one-dimensional case at φ=0.44, and that varying the lateral domain size changes quenching only through the reactivity factor, not through flame-surface area or consumption speed. They conclude that kinematic effects are minor and that the dominant mechanism is enhanced local reactivity from differential and preferential diffusion.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that two-dimensional direct numerical simulation with periodic lateral boundaries, an isothermal inert wall with zero species flux, and 20 grid points per flame thickness faithfully represents the quenching physics, so the conclusions transfer to three-dimensional engines and gas turbines; the only experimental comparison shows qualitative wall-temperature patterns, not measured quenching distances or heat fluxes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quenching distances and wall heat fluxes for lean hydrogen/air flames cannot be reliably taken from a single one-dimensional head-on quenching at the global equivalence ratio; the instability shifts both systematically.
  • Combustion models for flame-wall interaction must carry the full local mixture distribution, not just flame surface area or progress variable, to reproduce thermal loads on walls.
  • Flame-surface-area growth and consumption-speed enhancement play only a minor role in determining quenching; the reactivity of the mixture arriving at the wall is what matters.
  • Restricting the lateral domain changes quenching statistics only through the reactivity factor, so instability cell-size distributions matter indirectly through their effect on local mixture variation.
  • The time history of wall heat flux during quenching is bracketed by one-dimensional head-on quenchings at varying equivalence ratio, so an ensemble of such solutions can serve as a cheap surrogate for the unstable case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In three dimensions, with hydrodynamic instability and flame-generated turbulence adding strain, the local equivalence-ratio distribution may be broader or shifted, so whether the strict one-dimensional-ensemble collapse survives is an open question this paper does not settle.
  • Because hydrogen's high diffusivity lets mixture variations persist near the wall after quenching, a purely local steady mapping from φ to heat flux may miss memory effects in rapidly changing flame-front configurations; this could be tested by comparing predicted and simulated wall heat flux in strongly forced conditions.
  • The same reasoning suggests an experimental path: combining spatiotemporal wall-temperature measurements with a local equivalence-ratio marker would turn the qualitative wall-temperature-pattern observation into a direct quantitative test of the predicted heat-flux–φ correlation.
  • Part II's parametric sweep across pressure, equivalence ratio, and unburnt temperature will reveal whether the ensemble representation holds beyond φ=0.4, 298 K, and 1 atm or is restricted to the conditions studied here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents two-dimensional direct numerical simulations of head-on quenching (HOQ) of a thermodiffusively unstable lean hydrogen/air flame (φu = 0.4, Tu = 298 K, p = 1 atm) in domains of varying lateral width λ = Ly/δ_T between 2 and 100. A freely propagating unstable flame is first generated in a periodic domain and then mapped into a wall-bounded domain with an isothermal inert wall. The authors report that, compared to one-dimensional HOQ at the same nominal conditions, the unstable flame has smaller quenching Peclet numbers and larger quenching wall heat fluxes, and that these changes correlate with local mixture-enrichment-induced reactivity rather than with flame surface area or consumption speed. They conclude that unstable flame-wall interactions can be represented by an ensemble of one-dimensional head-on quenchings at different equivalence ratios, and that local mixture variations associated with differential and preferential diffusion are the dominant governing factor.

Significance. The paper provides a novel, detailed dataset on flame-wall interaction of thermodiffusively unstable H2/air flames, a configuration that is increasingly relevant for lean hydrogen combustion systems. If the proposed mechanism is confirmed, the study has direct implications for flamelet-based modeling of near-wall hydrogen combustion and for the interpretation of experimental wall-temperature patterns such as those of Ojo et al. [35]. Strengths of the work include the use of detailed chemistry with Soret diffusion, a systematic domain-width sweep that varies the instability cell-size distribution, multiple HOQ realizations per configuration, and several complementary analyses (PDFs of quenching quantities, conditionally averaged wall heat flux, and the reactivity factor I0). The main limitation is that the central ensemble-representation claim is inferred from correlations rather than demonstrated by a direct predictive test, and one of the key comparisons uses different conditioning variables for the two-dimensional and one-dimensional data.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Fig. 8 (right)] The comparison between the two-dimensional scatter points, colored by the local equivalence ratio at x/δ_T = 1 at the quenching time, and the one-dimensional HOQ markers, parameterized by the unburnt equivalence ratio φu,1D, is not an apples-to-apples comparison. As the paper itself notes in the footnote on page 11, differential diffusion alters the wall-normal equivalence-ratio profile even in one-dimensional HOQs, so the local φ at x/δ_T = 1 in a one-dimensional HOQ is generally different from its φu. Unless the two data sets are represented with the same conditioning observable (for instance, local φ at x/δ_T = 1 for both, or an equivalent unburnt-based quantity for the two-dimensional cases), the apparent collapse in Fig. 8 (right) could be partly coincidental. The authors should provide a comparison that uses the same observable for both data sets, or at least quantify the difference between local and unburnt equivalence ratios for the one-dimensional HOQs.
  2. [§5 and Novelty and Significance Statement] The statement that unstable flame-wall interactions 'can be represented by an ensemble of one-dimensional head-on quenchings at different equivalence ratios' goes beyond the evidence actually presented. The support consists of correlations (Figs. 8, 9, and 11) and conditional averages, but the paper never constructs such an ensemble from the measured two-dimensional local-φ distribution and then compares the predicted statistics (PDFs of Φq and Peq, their joint distribution, or their temporal evolution) against the two-dimensional DNS. Appendix A documents rare events (lean pockets, double quenching) that are exceptions to the representation, but their frequency and contribution to the overall statistics are not quantified, leaving the 'rare' qualifier unsubstantiated. Please either perform a direct ensemble test using the existing one-dimensional HOQ response functions, or soften the claim throughout the manuscript, including the Abstract and the novelty statement, to phrasing such as 'consistent with' rather than 'can be represented by'.
  3. [§2.1.1] The grid resolution of 20 grid points per flame thickness is not supported by a grid-convergence study. Because the quantitative conclusions concern near-wall quantities (quenching wall heat flux and quenching distance) that are sensitive to the resolution of the thermal boundary layer and to hydrogen differential diffusion near the wall, a resolution study, or at least a demonstration that the two-dimensional-versus-one-dimensional comparison is independent of resolution, is needed to establish the robustness of the quantitative claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix A.2] The text contains a typographical error: 'realease' should be 'release'.
  2. [§4.3, Fig. 11 (left)] The statement that there is 'no discernible correlation' between the mean wall heat flux and the consumption speed or surface area is based on visual inspection; a quantitative correlation measure (for example, Pearson's or Spearman's coefficient) would make this claim more rigorous.
  3. [Article front matter] The paper does not include a data availability statement; given the potential value of the dataset for the community, making the simulation configurations and post-processing scripts available would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusions] The Abstract states that the increased wall heat fluxes 'are caused by' enhanced reactivity, whereas the body of the paper uses 'suggest' and 'seems'; the level of certainty should be harmonized between the Abstract and the conclusions.
  5. [Fig. 11 caption] The caption of Fig. 11 (right) contains the phrase 'for varying a equivalence ratio', which should read 'for varying equivalence ratio'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 2D results are compared against independently computed 1D head-on-quenching references, with no fitted parameter forcing the collapse.

full rationale

The central comparison is not circular. The one-dimensional head-on-quenching simulations at varying equivalence ratios are independently computed reference solutions, not outputs derived from the two-dimensional DNS. No parameter is fitted to force the collapse in Figs. 8, 9, or 11; the 2D scatter is colored by the locally extracted equivalence ratio from the 2D simulation, while the 1D markers come from separate simulations at prescribed unburnt equivalence ratios. The reactivity factor I0 is defined from the freely propagating flame's consumption speed and surface area (Eq. 9), not from the quenching wall heat flux, so the correlation between I0 and the mean quenching wall heat flux is not circular. The self-citations in the paper are methodological (solver development, prior freely propagating flame characterization) and are not load-bearing for the claim that unstable flame-wall interaction can be represented by an ensemble of 1D HOQs at different equivalence ratios. The skeptical concern that the ensemble is never explicitly constructed from the 2D local-phi distribution and used to predict quenching statistics is a limitation in validation strength and completeness, not a definitional circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the fidelity of the DNS model chain and on the transferability of two-dimensional results to three-dimensional practical configurations. No new physical entities are introduced; I0, Peclet number, and quenching wall heat flux are derived diagnostics, not invented physics. The only hand-chosen inputs are the initial perturbation amplitude and the domain widths, neither of which is fitted to the target quenching quantities.

free parameters (2)
  • initial perturbation amplitude A0 = 0.01 delta_T^0
    Chosen by hand to seed the thermodiffusive instability. The flame is evolved for over 100 flame times to statistical stationarity, so exact value likely does not control the final results, but it is an input choice.
  • domain height multiples lambda = 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 100
    Domain widths are selected from previous literature to control the instability cell size distribution. They are not fitted to quenching data, but they determine which instability wavelengths are represented.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Li et al. 9-species, 19-reaction mechanism accurately represents lean hydrogen/air kinetics and quenching behavior.
    Used in Section 2.2 for all simulations; wall heat flux and quenching distance conclusions depend on chemical fidelity, and no direct experimental validation of the specific HOQ configuration is provided.
  • domain assumption Mixture-averaged diffusion with the Soret effect captures the differential diffusion responsible for the instabilities.
    Equations (1) through (4) in Section 2.2 define the transport model; differential diffusion is the physical mechanism the paper identifies as the cause of the observed effects.
  • domain assumption Two-dimensional periodic domains with the specified widths capture the statistical behavior of intrinsic instabilities relevant to quenching.
    Section 2.1 and Section 4.3 rely on this assumption; three-dimensional effects and turbulent fluctuations are absent, yet the conclusions are framed for technical combustors.
  • domain assumption The wall is inert, isothermal at Tu = 298 K, with no-slip velocity and zero species flux.
    Section 2.1.1 specifies these boundary conditions; real combustor walls can be catalytic or non-isothermal, which would change hydrogen quenching behavior.
  • domain assumption The open-source OpenFOAM base plus in-house solver modifications is well validated for this regime.
    Section 2.2 invokes prior validation studies rather than showing validation evidence in this paper; prior use is indirect support for the present configuration.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Flame-wall interaction of thermodiffusively unstable hydrogen/air flames -- Part I: Characterization of governing physical phenomena." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BZWIRFNG

@misc{pith2026241117590,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Flame-wall interaction of thermodiffusively unstable hydrogen/air flames -- Part I: Characterization of governing physical phenomena},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BZWIRFNG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17590}
}
read the original abstract

Hydrogen combustion systems operated under fuel-lean conditions offer great potential for low emissions. However, these operating conditions are also susceptible to intrinsic thermodiffusive combustion instabilities. Even though technical combustors are enclosed by walls that significantly influence the combustion process, intrinsic flame instabilities have mostly been investigated in canonical freely-propagating flame configurations unconfined by walls. This study aims to close this gap by investigating the flame-wall interaction of thermodiffusive unstable hydrogen/air flame through detailed numerical simulations in a two-dimensional head-on quenching configuration. It presents an in-depth qualitative and quantitative analysis of the quenching process, revealing the major impact factors of the instabilities on the quenching characteristics. The thermodiffusive instabilities result in lower quenching distances and increased wall heat fluxes compared to one-dimensional head-on quenching flames under similar operation conditions. The change in quenching characteristics seems not to be driven by kinematic effects. Instead, the increased wall heat fluxes are caused by the enhanced flame reactivity of the unstable flame approaching the wall, which results from mixture variations associated with the instabilities. Overall, the study highlights the importance of studying flame-wall interaction in more complex domains than simple one-dimensional configurations, where such instabilities are inherently suppressed. Further, it emphasizes the need to incorporate local mixture variations induced by intrinsic combustion instabilities in combustion models for flame-wall interactions. In part II of this study, the scope is expanded to gas turbine and internal combustion engine relevant conditions through a parametric study, varying the equivalence ratio, pressure, and unburnt temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17590 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the two-dimensional computational domain for the HOQ of the thermod￾iffusively unstable flames. The flame front is mapped from the initial simulations. The height of the domain in y-direction Ly is varied. Tab. 1. Overview of the dimensions of the domain Lx and Ly in x and y direction for the different values of λ, which specifies the constraint of the domain in y direction. num(HOQs) denotes the number… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic of the two-dimensional computational domain for generating the thermod￾iffusively unstable flames. The initial flame front consists of weakly perturbed one-dimensional unstretched flames. 2.1.2. Initial unsteady freely-propagating flame. The two-dimensional computational domain for generating the initial conditions is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Profiles of the normalized temperature Θ (top), the normalized local equivalence ratio φ/φu (middle) and the heat release rate HRR (bottom) over the numerical domain for λ = 100δ 0 T . line, is maxstrl.(φ) = 0.444, which is ≈ 11% larger than the equivalence ratio of the unburnt mixture. This distribution of the equivalence ratio highlights the local mixture variation due to differential and preferential diffusion as… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a): Streamlines of the gradient of YH2 in the area of the central flame finger (highlighted by the profile of the heat release rate). Every fifth streamline is shown. b): PDF of the maximum equivalence ratios along streamlines of the gradient of the H2 mass fraction, Y…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: PDF of the local consumption speed sc (along streamlines of YH2 ) normalized by the laminar flame speed of a one-dimensional freely-propagating flame at reference conditions sl,ref. of the unburnt mixture colored in the conditional mean of the maximum equivalence ratio…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (bottom left) shows the quenching P´eclet number, which in this work is defined as the minimum of the P´eclet number in time (min(P e(t)). The P´eclet number P e itself is defined as the wall distance of the flame (indicated by the maximum heat release rate along the w…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Quenching wall heat flux Φq (top) and quenching P´eclet number P eq (bottom) along the wall parallel coordinate y, normalized by the quenching wall heat flux Φ1D,ref. and the quenching P´eclet number P eq,1D,ref. of the one-dimensional HOQ at reference conditions…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Normalized wall heat flux Φ/Φq,1D,ref. (first column), normalized equivalence ratio φ/φu (second column), H2 mass fraction YH2 (third column) and heat release rate HRR (fourth column) of the central flame finger in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: PDF of the quenching wall heat flux Φq (top) and P´eclet number P eq (bottom) for λ = 100, both normalized by the values of a one-dimensional HOQ at reference conditions Φq,1D,ref. and P eq,1D,ref. , respectively. Right: Normalized quenching wall heat flux Φq/Φq,…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: PDF of the wall heat flux Φ over a relative normalized time (t − tq)/τ 0 T (relative to the quenching time tq and normalized by the characteristic flame time τ 0 T of a one-dimensional freely-propagating flame at reference conditions). The dashed blue line indicates th…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Profiles of the normalized temperature Θ over the numerical domain for the various constrained domains investigated (λ < 100). of data points (where PDF values exceed 1 · 10−6 ) can be effectively enclosed by one-dimensional HOQs at varying equivalence ratio φu. Data …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left: Normalized mean quenching wall heat flux Φq,2D/Φq,1D,ref., reactivity factor I0, normalized flame surface area, A/Ly, and normalized consumption speed sc/sl,ref. for different domain widths Ly = λδ0 T . Right: Normalized mean quenching wall heat flux Φq,2D/Φq,1D…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Temporal evolution of the normalized temperature Θ profiles (first row, right), heat release rate (second row, right), normalized equivalence ratio φ/φu (third row) and fuel mass fraction YH2 (fourth row) over a subsection of the domain for a HOQ with λ = 100. The das…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Wall heat flux Φ over a relative normalized time t−tq τ 0 T (relative to the quenching time tq and normalized by the flame time τ 0 T of a 1D freely-propagating flame at reference conditions) for two different points at the wall (y/δ0 T = 5 and y/δ0 T = 21.3). A.2. Do…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Multiple time instances of the normalized temperature Θ (top), heat re￾lease rate HRR (middle) and fuel mass fraction YH2 in the near-wall area over a small region of the numerical domain. The black arrows in the middle row correspond to streamlines of the gradient of…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Flame-wall interaction of thermodiffusively unstable hydrogen/air flames -- Part II: Parametric variations of equivalence ratio, temperature, and pressure

    physics.flu-dyn 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In 2D simulations of hydrogen/air head-on quenching, thermodiffusive instabilities raise mean wall heat flux by up to about threefold and reduce quenching distance, while hydrodynamic instabilities alone have little effect.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [35]

    A. O. Ojo, A. Padhiary, and B. Peterson. Spatiotemporal surface temperature measurements resolving flame-wall interactions of lean H 2-air and CH 4-air flames using phosphor thermom- etry. Flow. Turbul. Combust. , August 2024. ISSN 1573-1987

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Dreizler, H

    A. Dreizler, H. Pitsch, V. Scherer, C. Schulz, and J. Janicka. The role of combustion sci- ence and technology in low and zero impact energy transformation processes. Appl. Energy Combust. Sci. , 7:100040, September 2021. ISSN 2666-352X

    work page 2021

  3. [2]

    Verhelst and T

    S. Verhelst and T. Wallner. Hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. , 35:490–527, December 2009. ISSN 0360-1285

    2009

  4. [3]

    S. M. Correa. A review of NO x formation under gas-turbine combustion conditions. Combust. Sci. Technol., 87:329–362, January 1993. ISSN 1563-521X

    work page 1993

  5. [4]

    O. Kwon, G. Rozenchan, and C. Law. Cellular instabilities and self-acceleration of outwardly propagating spherical flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 29:1775–1783, January 2002. ISSN 1540- 7489

    work page 2002

  6. [5]

    Bauwens, J

    C. Bauwens, J. Bergthorson, and S. Dorofeev. Experimental investigation of spherical-flame acceleration in lean hydrogen-air mixtures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 42:7691–7697, March

    work page

  7. [6]

    Fern´ andez-Galisteo, V

    D. Fern´ andez-Galisteo, V. N. Kurdyumov, and P. D. Ronney. Analysis of premixed flame propagation between two closely-spaced parallel plates. Combust. Flame , 190:133–145, 2018. ISSN 0010-2180. 20

    work page 2018

  8. [7]

    Creta, P

    F. Creta, P. E. Lapenna, R. Lamioni, N. Fogla, and M. Matalon. Propagation of premixed flames in the presence of darrieus–landau and thermal diffusive instabilities. Combust. Flame, 216:256–270, June 2020. ISSN 0010-2180

    2020

Show all 47 references
  1. [8]

    Altantzis, C

    C. Altantzis, C. Frouzakis, A. Tomboulides, S. Kerkemeier, and K. Boulouchos. Detailed numerical simulations of intrinsically unstable two-dimensional planar lean premixed hydro- gen/air flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 33:1261–1268, 2011. ISSN 1540-7489

    2011

  2. [9]

    Altantzis, C

    C. Altantzis, C. E. Frouzakis, A. G. Tomboulides, M. Matalon, and K. Boulouchos. Hydrody- namic and thermodiffusive instability effects on the evolution of laminar planar lean premixed hydrogen flames. J. Fluid Mech. , 700:329–361, May 2012. ISSN 1469-7645

    2012

  3. [10]

    C. E. Frouzakis, N. Fogla, A. G. Tomboulides, C. Altantzis, and M. Matalon. Numerical study of unstable hydrogen/air flames: Shape and propagation speed. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 35:1087–1095, 2015. ISSN 1540-7489

    2015

  4. [11]

    Berger, K

    L. Berger, K. Kleinheinz, A. Attili, and H. Pitsch. Characteristic patterns of thermodiffusively unstable premixed lean hydrogen flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 37:1879–1886, 2019. ISSN 1540-7489

    2019

  5. [12]

    Attili, R

    A. Attili, R. Lamioni, L. Berger, K. Kleinheinz, P. E. Lapenna, H. Pitsch, and F. Creta. The effect of pressure on the hydrodynamic stability limit of premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 38:1973–1981, 2021. ISSN 1540-7489

    1973

  6. [13]

    Howarth and A

    T. Howarth and A. Aspden. An empirical characteristic scaling model for freely-propagating lean premixed hydrogen flames. Combust. Flame , 237:111805, March 2022. ISSN 0010-2180

    2022

  7. [14]

    X. Wen, T. Zirwes, A. Scholtissek, H. B¨ ottler, F. Zhang, H. Bockhorn, and C. Hasse. Flame structure analysis and composition space modeling of thermodiffusively unstable premixed hydrogen flames — Part i: Atmospheric pressure. Combust. Flame , 238:111815, April 2022. ISSN 0010-2180

    2022

  8. [15]

    X. Wen, T. Zirwes, A. Scholtissek, H. B¨ ottler, F. Zhang, H. Bockhorn, and C. Hasse. Flame structure analysis and composition space modeling of thermodiffusively unstable premixed hydrogen flames — Part ii: Elevated pressure. Combust. Flame , 238:111808, April 2022. ISSN 0010-2180

    2022

  9. [16]

    B¨ ottler, D

    H. B¨ ottler, D. Kaddar, T. J. P. Karpowski, F. Ferraro, A. Scholtissek, H. Nicolai, and C. Hasse. Can flamelet manifolds capture the interactions of thermo-diffusive instabilities and turbu- lence in lean hydrogen flames?—an a-priori analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 56:139...

    2024

  10. [17]

    Schuh, C

    V. Schuh, C. Hasse, and H. Nicolai. An extension of the artificially thickened flame approach for premixed hydrogen flames with intrinsic instabilities. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 40:105673,

  11. [18]

    H. Pitsch. The transition to sustainable combustion: Hydrogen- and carbon-based future fuels and methods for dealing with their challenges. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 40:105638, 2024. ISSN 1540-7489

    2024

  12. [19]

    Altantzis, C

    C. Altantzis, C. E. Frouzakis, A. G. Tomboulides, and K. Boulouchos. Direct numerical simulation of circular expanding premixed flames in a lean quiescent hydrogen-air mixture: Phenomenology and detailed flame front analysis. Combust. Flame , 162:331–344, February

  13. [20]

    Matalon, C

    M. Matalon, C. Cui, and J. K. Bechtold. Hydrodynamic theory of premixed flames: effects of stoichiometry, variable transport coefficients and arbitrary reaction orders. J. Fluid Mech. , 487:179–210, June 2003. ISSN 1469-7645

    2003

  14. [21]

    P. E. Lapenna, R. Lamioni, G. Troiani, and F. Creta. Large scale effects in weakly turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 37:1945–1952, 2019. ISSN 1540-7489

    1945

  15. [22]

    Lulic, A

    H. Lulic, A. Breicher, A. Scholtissek, P. E. Lapenna, A. Dreizler, F. Creta, C. Hasse, D. Geyer, and F. Ferraro. On polyhedral structures of lean methane/hydrogen bunsen flames: Combined experimental and numerical analysis. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 39:1977–1986, 2023. ISSN 1540- 7489

    1977

  16. [23]

    Welch, J

    C. Welch, J. Erhard, H. Shi, A. Dreizler, and B. B¨ ohm. An experimental investigation of lean hydrogen flame instabilities in spark-ignition engines. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 40:105391, 2024. 21 ISSN 1540-7489

    2024

  17. [24]

    Dreizler and B

    A. Dreizler and B. B¨ ohm. Advanced laser diagnostics for an improved understanding of premixed flame-wall interactions. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 35:37–64, 2015. ISSN 1540-7489

    2015

  18. [25]

    J. Lai, M. Klein, and N. Chakraborty. Direct numerical simulation of head-on quenching of statistically planar turbulent premixed methane-air flames using a detailed chemical mecha- nism. Flow. Turbul. Combust. , 101:1073–1091, April 2018. ISSN 1573-1987

    2018

  19. [26]

    Steinhausen, T

    M. Steinhausen, T. Zirwes, F. Ferraro, A. Scholtissek, H. Bockhorn, and C. Hasse. Flame- vortex interaction during turbulent side-wall quenching and its implications for flamelet man- ifolds. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 39:2149–2158, 2023. ISSN 1540-7489

    2023

  20. [27]

    Fritz, M

    J. Fritz, M. Kr¨ oner, and T. Sattelmayer. Flashback in a swirl burner with cylindrical premixing zone. J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power , 126:276–283, April 2004. ISSN 1528-8919

    2004

  21. [28]

    Dabireau, B

    F. Dabireau, B. Cuenot, O. Vermorel, and T. Poinsot. Interaction of flames of H 2 + O2 with inert walls. Combust. Flame , 135:123–133, October 2003. ISSN 0010-2180

    2003

  22. [29]

    Gruber, R

    A. Gruber, R. Sankaran, E. R. Hawkes, and J. H. Chen. Turbulent flame–wall interaction: a direct numerical simulation study. J. Fluid Mech. , 658:5–32, August 2010. ISSN 1469-7645

    2010

  23. [30]

    De Nardi, Q

    L. De Nardi, Q. Douasbin, O. Vermorel, and T. Poinsot. Infinitely fast heterogeneous catalysis model for premixed hydrogen flame-wall interaction. Combust. Flame , 261:113328, March

  24. [31]

    R. Mari, B. Cuenot, J.-P. Rocchi, L. Selle, and F. Duchaine. Effect of pressure on hydro- gen/oxygen coupled flame–wall interaction. Combust. Flame , 168:409–419, June 2016. ISSN 0010-2180

    2016

  25. [32]

    D. Zhao, F. E. Hern´ andez P´ erez, C. Guo, H. G. Im, and L. Wang. Near wall effects on the premixed head-on hydrogen/air flame. Combust. Flame , 244:112267, October 2022. ISSN 0010-2180

    2022

  26. [33]

    J. Zhu, T. Zirwes, F. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Zhang, and J. Pan. Correlation of wall heat loss with quenching distance for premixed H2/air flames during unsteady flame-wall interaction. Chem. Eng. Science, 283:119391, January 2024. ISSN 0009-2509

    2024

  27. [34]

    C. Chi, C. Yu, B. Cuenot, U. Maas, and D. Th´ evenin. Effect of differential diffusion on head-on quenching of premixed NH 3/H2/air flames within turbulent boundary layers. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 40:105276, 2024. ISSN 1540-7489

    2024

  28. [36]

    H. G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, and C. Fureby. A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques.Comput. Phys., 12:620–631, November

  29. [37]

    Schneider, M

    M. Schneider, M. Steinhausen, H. Nicolai, and C. Hasse. Modeling of effusion cooling air- flame interaction using thermochemical manifolds. Proc. Combust. Inst. , 40:105453, 2024. ISSN 1540-7489

    2024

  30. [38]

    J. Li, Z. Zhao, A. Kazakov, and F. L. Dryer. An updated comprehensive kinetic model of hydrogen combustion. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. , 36:566–575, August 2004. ISSN 1097-4601

    2004

  31. [39]

    R. J. Kee, M. E. Coltrin, P. Glarborg, and H. Zhu. Chemically Reacting Flow: Theory, Modeling, and Simulation . Wiley, September 2017. ISBN 9781119186304

    2017

  32. [40]

    D. G. Goodwin, H. K. Moffat, I. Schoegl, R. L. Speth, and B. W. Weber. Cantera: An object- oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes. https://www.cantera.org, 2023. Version 3.0.0

    2023

  33. [41]

    Chapman and T

    S. Chapman and T. Cowling. The Mathematical Theory of Non-uniform Gases: An Account of the Kinetic Theory of Viscosity, Thermal Conduction and Diffusion in Gases . Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, 1990. ISBN 9780521408448

    1990

  34. [42]

    Schlup and G

    J. Schlup and G. Blanquart. Validation of a mixture-averaged thermal diffusion model for premixed lean hydrogen flames. Combust. Theor. Model. , 22:264–290, November 2017. ISSN 1741-3559. 22

    2017

  35. [43]

    A. C. Hindmarsh, P. N. Brown, K. E. Grant, S. L. Lee, R. Serban, D. E. Shumaker, and C. S. Woodward. SUNDIALS: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) , 31:363–396, 2005

    2005

  36. [44]

    D. J. Gardner, D. R. Reynolds, C. S. Woodward, and C. J. Balos. Enabling new flexibil- ity in the SUNDIALS suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) , 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    K. E. Niemeyer, N. J. Curtis, and C.-J. Sung. pyjac: Analytical jacobian generator for chemical kinetics. Compu. Phys. Commun. , 215:188–203, June 2017. ISSN 0010-4655

    2017

  38. [46]

    Tekg¨ ul, P

    B. Tekg¨ ul, P. Peltonen, H. Kahila, O. Kaario, and V. Vuorinen. Dlbfoam: An open-source dynamic load balancing model for fast reacting flow simulations in openfoam. Compu. Phys. Commun., 267:108073, October 2021. ISSN 0010-4655

    2021

  39. [47]

    Poinsot, D

    T. Poinsot, D. Haworth, and G. Bruneaux. Direct simulation and modeling of flame-wall interaction for premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame , 95:118–132, October 1993. ISSN 0010-2180. 23

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.