Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Boolean Unateness Testing with $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/4})$ Adaptive Queries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1708.05786 v1 pith:C2AEHWBQ submitted 2017-08-19 cs.CC

classification cs.CC
keywords adaptiveepsilonalgorithmbooleanerrorone-sidedwidetildequeries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We give an adaptive algorithm which tests whether an unknown Boolean function $f\colon \{0, 1\}^n \to\{0, 1\}$ is unate, i.e. every variable of $f$ is either non-decreasing or non-increasing, or $\epsilon$-far from unate with one-sided error using $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/4}/\epsilon^2)$ queries. This improves on the best adaptive $O(n/\epsilon)$-query algorithm from Baleshzar, Chakrabarty, Pallavoor, Raskhodnikova and Seshadhri when $1/\epsilon \ll n^{1/4}$. Combined with the $\widetilde{\Omega}(n)$-query lower bound for non-adaptive algorithms with one-sided error of [CWX17, BCPRS17], we conclude that adaptivity helps for the testing of unateness with one-sided error. A crucial component of our algorithm is a new subroutine for finding bi-chromatic edges in the Boolean hypercube called adaptive edge search.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools