pith. sign in

arxiv: 1810.02131 · v2 · pith:C2VFKJAOnew · submitted 2018-10-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Rotation curve of the Milky Way from Classical Cepheids

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords rotationcurvedistancesgalacticmilkyaccuratecentercepheids
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:C2VFKJAO Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{C2VFKJAO}

Prints a linked pith:C2VFKJAO badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

Flat rotation curves of spiral galaxies are considered as an evidence for dark matter, but the rotation curve of the Milky Way is difficult to measure. Various objects were used to track the rotation curve in the outer parts of the Galaxy, but most studies rely on incomplete kinematical information and inaccurate distances. Here, we use a sample of 773 Classical Cepheids with precise distances based on mid-infrared period-luminosity relations coupled with proper motions and radial velocities from Gaia to construct the accurate rotation curve of the Milky Way up to the distance of ~20 kpc from the Galactic center. We use a simple model of Galactic rotation to measure the rotation speed of the Sun Theta_0 = 233.6 +/- 2.8 km/s, assuming a prior on the distance to the Galactic center R_0 = 8.122 +/- 0.031 kpc from the Gravity Collaboration. The rotation curve at Galactocentric distances 4 < R < 20 kpc is nearly flat with a small gradient of -1.34 +/- 0.21 km/s/kpc. This is the most accurate Galactic rotation curve at distances R > 12 kpc constructed so far.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Determination of the best dark matter profile for the Milky Way with Gaia DR3 using Bayesian Model Comparison

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bayesian comparison of Gaia DR3 rotation curves favors the Einasto dark matter profile over NFW, prefers cored over cuspy profiles, and finds MOND variants provide poorer fits than the best dark matter models.