REVIEW 1 cited by
Cancellation for $(G,n)$-complexes and the Swan finiteness obstruction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In previous work, we related homotopy types of finite $(G,n)$-complexes when $G$ has periodic cohomology to projective $\mathbb{Z} G$-modules representing the Swan finiteness obstruction. We use this to determine when $X \vee S^n \simeq Y \vee S^n$ implies $X \simeq Y$ for finite $(G,n)$-complexes $X$ and $Y$, and give lower bounds on the number of homotopically distinct pairs when this fails. The proof involves constructing projective $\mathbb{Z} G$-modules as lifts of locally free modules over orders in products of quaternion algebras, whose existence follows from the Eichler mass formula. In the case $n=2$, difficulties arise which lead to a new approach to finding a counterexample to Wall's D2 problem.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Connected sum decompositions of high-dimensional manifolds
In dimensions n at least 4, S^2 x S^(n-2) is not cancellable, so connected sum decomposition is not unique; for simply connected manifolds the same failure is claimed for n at least 17.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.