Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 70 references

Geodesic vortex detection on curved surfaces: Analyzing the 2002 austral stratospheric polar vortex warming event

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Geodesic vortex detection, extended to curved surfaces and arbitrary coordinates, reconstructs the 2002 austral polar vortex life cycle from isentropic winds.

desk verdict Useful, honest manifold extension of geodesic vortex detection with a solid 2002 SPV case study, but the curved-surface stationarity proof is skipped and the birth/death dates rest on a 30-day wedge assumption - still worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03135 v2 pith:C7M3ZITJ submitted 2025-01-06 nlin.CD physics.ao-phphysics.flu-dyn

classification nlin.CDphysics.ao-phphysics.flu-dyn MSC 37N10
keywords geodesicvortexdetectioncoherentLagrangianvorticesp-loopssuddenstratosphericwarmingaustralpolarCauchy–Greenstraintensorozonedepletionisentropicwinds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Geodesic vortex detection is a way to identify vortices whose boundaries are material curves that resist stretching, without choosing a preferred observer. This paper extends it from flat Cartesian flows to general two-dimensional curved surfaces, in arbitrary coordinates, by building the detection line field from the metric-corrected Cauchy–Green tensor. Applied to isentropic reanalysis winds on the southern hemisphere, the method frames the full 2002 austral polar vortex life cycle: birth around 31 March 2002, death of the pre-split vortex around 21 September 2002, and split around 23 September 2002. It also shows that the vortex edge confines ozone-depleted air, while a weaker inner loop with $p$ near 1.6 lets that air mix poleward rather than equatorward.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the p-loop equation (15), $r'=\ell^\pm_p(r)$, built from the two eigenvalue–eigenvector pairs of $G^{-1}C$ with $0<\lambda_1<p^2<\lambda_2$; the eigenvectors are orthonormal with respect to the metric, and the line-field coefficients make every solution stretch by exactly $p$. The paper's second mechanism is the modified birth-and-death framing: because stratospheric air leaves an isentropic surface after roughly $\tau=30$ days, the life-expectancy curve $T_{\mathrm{exp}}(t_0)$ is expected to be a truncated wedge of height $\tau$, so the pre-split vortex death is read as $t_{\mathrm{death}}=t_0^{\mathrm{late}}+\tau$ and its birth as $t_{\mathrm{birth}}=t_0^{\mathrm{early}}-\tau$ from the plateau edges in forward and backward time.

What would settle it

Run the birth-and-death framing on the same isentropic winds with the coherence cap set to 20, 30, and 45 days; if the inferred birth and death dates move with the cap, the plateau-edge dates are artifacts of the cap and not intrinsic vortex properties.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that geodesic vortex detection remains valid and observer-independent on a 2D Riemannian manifold when the p-loop line field is formed from the eigenvalue–eigenvector pairs of $G^{-1}C$, where $G$ is the coordinate representation of the manifold metric and $C$ is the coordinate representation of the right Cauchy–Green strain tensor. The closed limit cycles of the resulting line field, the p-loops, are material curves stretching uniformly by a factor $p$ over $[t_0,t_0+T]$, and the outermost loop in a nested family is the vortex boundary. With this metric-aware construction and a truncated-wedge birth-and-death algorithm capped at 30 days of valid two-dimensional motion, the authors report the first geodesic-detection-based life cycle of the austral stratospheric polar vortex: birth on 31 March 2002, pre-split death on 21 September 2002, split on 23 September 2002, and ozone-poor air held by the vortex edge ($p\approx1$) but leaking poleward across an inner loop with $p\approx1.6$.

Load-bearing premise

The birth and death dates rest on the assumption that the vortex's measured coherence lifetime forms a flat plateau of height 30 days, so the dates can be read off the plateau edges; if the plateau is not flat or the 30-day cap does not match how long the two-dimensional isentropic approximation really holds, the dates are artifacts of the cap rather than properties of the vortex.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The metric-aware p-loop construction can be applied to any two-dimensional flow on a curved surface without projecting to a plane, so ocean and planetary vortices on a sphere become directly detectable.
  • Vortex boundaries identified this way are observer-independent even in non-orthogonal coordinates, so edge-based diagnostics such as ozone or temperature contrasts can be compared across studies without frame corrections.
  • The method gives a concrete timetable for the 2002 sudden stratospheric warming—birth 31 March, pre-split death 21 September, split 23 September—that can anchor kinematic comparisons with dynamical explanations of the event.
  • The ozone analysis indicates that the vortex edge is a stronger transport barrier than the inner $p\approx1.6$ loop, so ozone-poor air is mixed poleward into the vortex interior; a similar two-barrier geometry may structure other polar vortices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors do not test whether the plateau-edge dates shift under a different coherence cap; re-running the framing with $\tau=20$ and 45 days would separate a genuine vortex property from a cap artifact.
  • The same metric-aware construction should extend to a global atlas of charts, making geodesic vortex detection usable on full spherical data; the southern-cap parameterization used here is a natural template.
  • The kinematic poleward-mixing claim is testable in a chemistry-transport model: seed an inert tracer inside the 13 August 2002 low-ozone ring and see whether it crosses the $p\approx1.6$ loop poleward within 30 days.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends geodesic vortex detection, previously formulated for Euclidean flows with Cartesian coordinates, to two-dimensional Riemannian manifolds with arbitrary coordinates, and adapts the birth-and-death CLV framing algorithm to the finite-time validity of the isentropic two-dimensional approximation in the stratosphere. The method is applied to ERA5 600-K isentropic winds to characterize the 2002 austral stratospheric polar vortex, reporting a birth around 31 March 2002, a pre-split death around 21 September 2002, a split around 23 September 2002, and an ozone depletion analysis identifying an outer vortex edge with p≈1 and an inner p-loop with p≈1.6 that routes ozone-poor air poleward. The paper also makes a computational implementation available.

Significance. If the methodological claims hold, the paper provides a general framework for objective vortex detection on curved surfaces and delivers the first geodesic-detection-based life cycle of the austral polar vortex, which is a widely studied but difficult case due to the splitting event. The objectivity argument under isometric observer changes is clean and correctly distinguishes coordinate from metric representations. The public code release and the use of a standard reanalysis are strengths. The main significance depends on the unresolved stationarity question for the manifold p-loop equation and on the robustness of the birth/death dates to the assumed truncated-wedge coherence profile.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (15), Appendix A] The central claim that limit cycles of the line field (15) are stationary curves of the variational principle (14) is not established. Appendix A verifies only that curves tangent to (15) satisfy the pointwise uniform-stretching condition L(r,r')=p, i.e., that they are null curves of C−pG, but it does not verify the Euler–Lagrange equations. The authors' own statement that the equivalence to the HBV13 p-loop equation is 'only formal' concedes this gap. On a curved surface the stationarity condition involves connection terms that depend on derivatives of G and C, and the algebraic construction (15) contains no such terms. Because the vortex identifications in Section 4 and the ozone analysis in Section 5 all rely on (15), the paper should either supply a rigorous derivation for arbitrary 2-D Riemannian manifolds or explicitly revise the claim to describe the detected loops as uniformly stretching material loops rather than extremizers of the averaged stretching.
  2. [Section 3, steps 2.a and 2.b] The inferred birth and death dates, including tbirth=31 March 2002 and tdeath=21 September 2002, rest entirely on the assumption that Texp(t0) has a truncated wedge shape at height τ=30 days. This assumption is asserted without sensitivity analysis: no tests for other values of τ, no error bars on the plateau edges t_late^0 and t_early^0, and no discussion of how deviations from a flat plateau would shift the dates. The paper acknowledges that the estimated vortex lifespan exceeds τ, so the objects are only quasi-CLVs. Given that the life-cycle dates are a headline result, the authors should provide evidence that the plateau structure is robust to the choice of τ or reframe the dates as conditional on this modeling assumption.
  3. [Section 5, Figures 7 and 8] The validation of the vortex edge as a transport barrier is weakened by two acknowledged issues that should be addressed more directly. First, the advected image of the 21 August 2002 p≈0.9 loop on 19 September exhibits a measured relative stretching of about 2.15, which contradicts the uniform-stretching property defining a p-loop; the explanation in terms of tangential stretching and noise is plausible but unquantified. Second, the inner p≈1.6 loop of 13 August is selected a posteriori to coincide with the poleward boundary of the low-ozone ring, using the same ERA5 wind and ozone fields, so the conclusion that ozone-depleted air mixes poleward is partly constructed from the target data. The authors should add independent support, such as a different tracer, a different reanalysis, or an a priori selection of the inner loop from the line field alone, or explicitly label this part as a consistency check rather than a prediction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1.1.1] The heading 'Kinematics of SVPs' and nearby text use 'SVP' inconsistently with the stated acronym 'SPV'; please harmonize the terminology throughout.
  2. [Introduction] The first sentence contains the typo 'deliniate'; it should read 'delineate'.
  3. [Section 3] The word 'dyapicnic' appears in the paragraph on the temporal validity of the 2-D assumption; it should be 'diapycnic'.
  4. [References] Reference [LR10] contains the typo 'Lyapunoc'; the correct term is 'Lyapunov'.
  5. [Equations (15)-(17)] The eigenvector notation is inconsistent: equations (15) and (17) use a superscript parenthetical index while equation (16) does not; please standardize.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Ozone-barrier 'confirmation' is partly constructed: the p≈1.6 inner loop is chosen to sit on the low-ozone ring, and the birth/death dates are arithmetic consequences of the truncated-wedge cap; the central manifold p-loop equation is independent but only formally justified.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5, paragraph describing Figure 8 (inner p-loop selection)]
    "In addition to the SPV’s edge, on t0 = 13 August 2002, we extracted the p-loop closest to the poleward boundary of the low-ozone concentration ring on that day. This p-loop has p≈ 1.6, and by t0 +T = 11 September 2002, it shows visible signs inward filamentation. Consistent with the presence of the two p-loops extracted, the ozone-poor air is not mixed equatorward, but rather poleward."

    The p≈1.6 loop is not an independent find: it is selected precisely because it lies on the target low-ozone ring's poleward boundary. Its alignment with that boundary is therefore enforced by the selection procedure, not discovered. Presenting this loop as a transport barrier that explains poleward ozone mixing is a post-hoc attribution to a structure fitted to the ozone field. The paper's own admission that the low-ozone boundary 'does not precisely follow' the movement of the 1.6-loop shows the match is approximate, so the kinematic explanation is constructed rather than independently tested.

  2. self definitional [Section 3, steps 2.a–2.b; applied in Section 4.4.1]
    "It is anticipated that the theoretical Texp(t0) will exhibit the form of a truncated wedge at height τ. The death date of the CLV can consequently be forecasted by determining the latest t0, tlate0, for which Texp(t0) maintains stability around τ, augmented by τ, viz., tdeath = tlate0 +τ. ... tbirth will be determined as the earliest t0, tearly0, for which |Texp(t0)| remains stable and close to τ, minus τ."

    The reported birth and death dates (31 March and 21 September 2002) are not independent predictions; they are arithmetic consequences of the assumed truncated-wedge shape and the chosen cap τ=30 days, read off the plateau edges. When Section 4.4.1 says the observed Texp is 'validating the predicted birth date', the validation is circular because the 'prediction' is the same formula used to define the date. At most this is a consistency check of the wedge assumption, not a derivation of the vortex lifetime.

full rationale

The central manifold extension is not circular: Eq. (15) is constructed directly from the eigenpairs of G^{-1}C and reduces to the Euclidean p-loop equation when G=I, and the objectivity calculation is a self-contained tensor computation. The Appendix A statement that the equivalence to [HBV13] is 'only formal' is a proof gap rather than circularity: the stationarity of the action (14) for curves tangent to (15) on curved surfaces is imported by analogy with the authors' earlier Euclidean work, so the central claim should be treated as an ansatz pending an explicit Euler–Lagrange proof on the manifold. That is a correctness risk, not an input-output identity. The two partial circularities that do warrant flagging are in the applications: the inner p-loop used to interpret ozone depletion is selected to match the low-ozone ring, so its 'explanation' of poleward ozone mixing is fitted rather than tested; and the life-cycle dates are defined by the truncated-wedge convention with τ=30 days, so calling them 'predicted' and 'validated' is self-referential. The outer-edge ozone comparison is not circular because the edge is detected from the wind field and then overlaid on an independently archived ozone field, although both fields come from the same reanalysis system, which limits the strength of the test but does not make it circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard differential geometry plus a domain assumption about the 30-day validity of 2D isentropic motion. The birth/death dates further depend on the truncated-wedge shape of Texp(t0), which is an ad hoc modeling assumption. The ozone analysis selects an inner p-loop to match the observed low-ozone ring, adding a fitted element to the kinematic story. No new physical forces or particles are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • coherence horizon tau = 30 days
    Chosen from the literature estimate (Haynes 2005) of the time after which diapycnic mixing breaks the 2D isentropic assumption; used as the truncation height in the birth-and-death framing (Section 3).
  • quick-scan window T = 10 days
    Selected based on an approximate estimate of the persistence of the smaller post-split vortex; acknowledged preset in Section 4.3.
  • inner p-loop value p = about 1.6
    The p-loop nearest the poleward boundary of the low-ozone ring is selected to match the observed ozone feature (Section 5, Figure 8), so the subsequent kinematic interpretation is not independent of the data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The 2D isentropic flow model is valid for up to tau = 30 days on the 600 K surface.
    Invoked in Section 3 to justify restricting T and interpreting truncated wedges; relies on Haynes 2005.
  • ad hoc to paper Texp(t0) has a truncated wedge shape at height tau for a quasi-CLV.
    Section 3 states 'It is anticipated that the theoretical Texp(t0) will exhibit the form of a truncated wedge at height tau'; birth and death dates are read off from plateau edges.
  • domain assumption Observer changes on a manifold are isometries satisfying Q^T \bar G Q = G.
    Section 2.3 defines objectivity on manifolds via this condition; it is a modeling choice about what physical objectivity means on curved surfaces.
  • domain assumption ERA5 600 K isentropic winds faithfully represent stratospheric flow in the 2002 austral winter.
    All computations use ERA5; the paper notes sparse stratospheric observations and missing satellite ozone support near the South Pole until late September 2002 (Section 5).
  • standard math Standard index theory for planar line fields applies locally to p-line fields on manifolds.
    Used in Appendix A to state a necessary condition for p-loop existence; referred to KHH14 and KS20.
invented entities (1)
  • quasi-CLV
    purpose: Label for vortices whose coherence horizon exceeds tau so that the boundary at death is not the advected image of the boundary at birth; justifies applying birth/death framing under the 2D validity cap.
    Introduced in Section 3 final paragraph; it is a definitional label with no independent falsifiable content.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geodesic vortex detection on curved surfaces: Analyzing the 2002 austral stratospheric polar vortex warming event." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C7M3ZITJ

@misc{pith2026250103135,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geodesic vortex detection on curved surfaces: Analyzing the 2002 austral stratospheric polar vortex warming event},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C7M3ZITJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03135}
}
read the original abstract

Geodesic vortex detection is a tool in nonlinear dynamical systems to objectively identify transient vortices with flow-invariant boundaries that defy the typical deformation found in 2-d turbulence. Initially formulated for flows on the Euclidean plane with Cartesian coordinates, we have extended this technique to flows on 2-d Riemannian manifolds with arbitrary coordinates. This extension required the further formulation of the concept of objectivity on manifolds. Moreover, a recently proposed birth-and-death vortex framing algorithm, based on geodesic detection, has been adapted to address the limited temporal validity of 2-d motion in otherwise 3-d flows, like those found in the Earth's stratosphere. With these adaptations, we focused on the Lagrangian, i.e., kinematic, aspects of the austral stratospheric polar vortex during the exceptional sudden warming event of 2002, which resulted in the vortex splitting. This study involved applying geodesic vortex detection to isentropic winds from reanalysis data. We provide a detailed analysis of the vortex's life cycle, covering its birth, the splitting process, and its eventual death. In addition, we offer new kinematic insights into ozone depletion within the vortex.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03135 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The results show the application of geodesic vortex detection to reanalyzed winds on the 600-K isentropic surface over time windows [t0, t0 + T], with t0 rolling throughout 2002 and T = 10 days. Each detected CLV boundary is colored based on its stretching value (p). The interiors of the CLVs, which can be identified with different stages of the SPV due to their persistence, are shown in red prior to the SPV’s split… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The birth of the austral SVP in 2002 depicted through geodesic vortex detection. The top panels demonstrate various stages of the formation process, while the bottom panel depicts the life expectancy against Lagrangian coherence time, as estimated numerically in a backward direction. The stretching parameter varies from p ≈ 0.94 to 1.12. irresponsive to CLV detection until t0 = 18 September 2002. Tracing back to t e… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The top and bottom panels show the same information as Figures 2 and 3, respectively, but for the larger of the two vortices formed when the austral SPV split in 2002 as a result of the SSW. The stretching parameter varies from p ≈ 0.92 to 1.18 in the top, and from p ≈…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of the splitting of the SPV resulting from the SSW in 2002 as framed by geodesic vortex detection. 4.4.3 Assessing the splitting instant Using the results of the birth-and-death CLV framing analysis conducted before and after the splitting of the SPV, it b…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Overlaid on the ozone mass fraction per kilogram of air is the edge of the SPV (thick black loop) as extracted using geodesic vortex detection from reanalyzed isentropic winds. The geodesic vortex detection is applied T = 30 days forward from the Lagrangian coherence a…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andrade‐Canto and F

    F. Andrade‐Canto and F. J. Beron‐Vera. Do eddies connect the tropical Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico? Geophysical Research Letters , 49:e2022GL099637, 2022

  2. [2]

    Beron-Vera, Gustavo J

    Fernando Andrade-Canto, Francisco J. Beron-Vera, Gustavo J. Goni, Daniel Karrasch, Maria J. Olascoaga, and Joquin Trinanes. Carriers of Sargassum and mechanism for coastal inundation in the Caribbean Sea . Phys.\ Fluids , 34:016602, 2022

  3. [3]

    Andrade-Canto, D

    F. Andrade-Canto, D. Karrasch, and F. J. Beron-Vera. Genesis, evolution, and apocalyse of Loop Current rings . Phys. Fluids , 32:116603, 2020

  4. [4]

    An inflated dynamic laplacian to track the emergence and disappearance of semi-material coherent sets

    Jason Atnip, Gary Froyland, and P\'eter Koltai. An inflated dynamic laplacian to track the emergence and disappearance of semi-material coherent sets. arXiv.2403.10360, 2024

  5. [5]

    D. G. Andrews, J. R. Holton, and C. B. Leovy. Middle Atmosphere Dynamics , volume 40 of International Geophysical Series . Academic, 1987

  6. [6]

    V. I. Arnold, V. V. Kozlov, and A. I. Neishtadt. Mathematical aspects of classical and celestial mechanics. In Dynamical Systems III , volume 3 of Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciencies , page 518. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, third edition, 2006

  7. [7]

    Abraham, J

    R. Abraham, J. E. Marsden, and T. Ratiu. Manifolds, Tensor Analysis and Applications . Second E dition, A pplied M athematical S ciences 75. Springer, 1988

  8. [8]

    V. I. Arnold. Ordinary Differential Equations . Massachussets Institute of Technology, 1973

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Butler, Dian J

    Amy H. Butler, Dian J. Seidel, Steven C. Hardiman, Neal Butchart, Thomas Birner, and Aaron Match. Defining sudden stratospheric warmings. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , 96(11):1913–1928, November 2015

  2. [10]

    Bodnariuk, M

    N. Bodnariuk, M. Saraceno, L. A. Ruiz‐Etcheverry, C. Simionato, F. Andrade‐Canto, F. J. Beron‐Vera, and M. J. Olascoaga. Multiple lagrangian jet‐core structures in the Malvinas Current . Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , 129:e2023JC020446, 2024

  3. [11]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, M. G. Brown, M. J. Olascoaga, I. I. Rypina, H. Kocak, and I. A. Udovydchenkov. Zonal jets as transport barriers in planetary atmospheres. J. Atmos. Sci. , 65:3316--3326, 2008

  4. [12]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, M. G. Brown, and H. Ko c ak. Zonal jets as meridional transport barriers in the subtropical and polar lower stratosphere. J. Atmos Sci. , 69:753--767, 2012

  5. [13]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, and G. J. Goni. Surface ocean mixing inferred from different multisatellite altimetry measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr. , 40:2466--2480, 2010

  6. [14]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, G. Haller, M. Farazmand, J. Tri\ nanes , and Y. Wang. Dissipative inertial transport patterns near coherent Lagrangian eddies in the ocean . Chaos , 25:087412, 2015

  7. [15]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, Y. Wang, M. J. Olascoaga, G. J. Goni, and G. Haller. Objective detection of oceanic eddies and the Agulhas leakage . J. Phys. Oceanogr. , 43:1426--1438, 2013

  8. [16]

    Lagrangian analysis of the northern stratospheric polar vortex split in april 2020

    Jezabel Curbelo, Gang Chen, and Carlos Roberto Mechoso. Lagrangian analysis of the northern stratospheric polar vortex split in april 2020. Geophysical Research Letters , 48(16), August 2021

  9. [17]

    Mechoso, Ana M

    Jezabel Curbelo, Carlos R. Mechoso, Ana M. Mancho, and Stephen Wiggins. Lagrangian study of the final warming in the southern stratosphere during 2002: Part I. T he vortex splitting at upper levels. Climate Dynamics , 53:2779–2792, 2019

  10. [18]

    del-Castillo-Negrete and P

    D. del-Castillo-Negrete and P. J. Morrison. Chaotic transport by R ossby waves in shear flow. Phys. Fluids A , 5(4):948--965, 1993

  11. [19]

    D. G. Dritschel and M. E. McIntyre. Multiple jets as PV staircases: the Phillips effect and the resilience of eddy-transport barriers . J. Atmos. Sci. , 65:855--874, 2008

  12. [20]

    G. F. D. Duff. Limit cycles and rotated vector fields. Ann. Math. , 57:15--31, 1953

  13. [21]

    J. G. Esler, L. M. Polvani, and R. K. Scott. The Antarctic stratospheric sudden warming of 2002: A self-tuned resonance? Geophys. Res. Lett. , 33:L12804, 2006

  14. [22]

    Farazmand, D

    M. Farazmand, D. Blazevski, and G. Haller. Shearless transport barriers in unsteady two-dimensional flows and maps. Physica D , 278-279:44--57, 2014

  15. [23]

    J. C. Farman, B. G. Gardiner, and J. D. Shanklin. Large losses of ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClO _x /NO _x interaction . Nature , 315:207--210, 1985

  16. [24]

    Detecting the birth and death of finite‐time coherent sets

    Gary Froyland and Péter Koltai. Detecting the birth and death of finite‐time coherent sets. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 76(12):3642–3684, July 2023

  17. [25]

    G. Haller. A variational theory of hyperbolic Lagrangian Coherent Structures . Physica D , 240:574--598, 2011

  18. [26]

    G. Haller. Lagrangian coherent structures. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 47:137--162, 2015

  19. [27]

    G. Haller. Climate, black holes and vorticity: H ow on E arth are they related? SIAM News , 49:1--2, 2016

  20. [28]

    Transport Barriers and Coherent Structures in Flow Data

    George Haller. Transport Barriers and Coherent Structures in Flow Data . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kindom, 2023

  21. [29]

    P. Haynes. Stratospheric dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 37:263--293, 2005

  22. [30]

    Hans Hersbach, Bill Bell, Paul Berrisford, Shoji Hirahara, András Horányi, Joaquín Muñoz‐Sabater, Julien Nicolas, Carole Peubey, Raluca Radu, Dinand Schepers, Adrian Simmons, Cornel Soci, Saleh Abdalla, Xavier Abellan, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Peter Bechtold, Gionata Biavati, Jean B...

  23. [31]

    Beron-Vera

    George Haller and Francisco J. Beron-Vera. Geodesic theory of transport barriers in two-dimensional flows. Physica D , 241:1680--1702, 2012

  24. [32]

    Beron-Vera

    George Haller and Francisco J. Beron-Vera. Coherent Lagrangian vortices: The black holes of turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. , 731:R4, 2013

  25. [33]

    Beron-Vera

    George Haller and Francisco J. Beron-Vera. Addendum to `Coherent Lagrangian vortices: The black holes of turbulence' . J. Fluid Mech. , 755:R3, 2014

  26. [34]

    Hadjighasem and G

    A. Hadjighasem and G. Haller. Geodesic transport barriers in Jupiter's atmosphere: a video-based analysis . SIAM Review , 58:69--89, 2016

  27. [35]

    Material barriers to diffusive and stochastic transport

    George Haller, Daniel Karrasch, and Florian Kogelbauer. Material barriers to diffusive and stochastic transport. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 115:9074--9079, 2018

  28. [36]

    Haller and G

    G. Haller and G. Yuan. Lagrangian coherent structures and mixing in two-dimensional turbulence. Physica D , 147:352--370, 2000

  29. [37]

    N. M. Juckes and M. E. McIntyre. A high-resolution one-layer model of breaking planetary waves in the stratosphere. Nature , 328:590--596, 1987

  30. [38]

    Jucker, T

    M. Jucker, T. Reichler, and D. W. Waugh. How frequent are Antarctic sudden stratospheric warmings in present and future climate? Geophysical Research Letters , 48(11), June 2021

  31. [39]

    Karrasch

    D. Karrasch. Attracting Lagrangian coherent structures on Riemannian manifolds . Chaos , 25:087411, 2015

  32. [40]

    Karrasch, F

    D. Karrasch, F. Huhn, and G. Haller. Automated detection of coherent Lagrangian vortices in two-dimensional unsteady flows . Proc. Royal Soc. A , 471:20140639, 2014

  33. [41]

    Fast and robust computation of coherent Lagrangian vortices on very large two-dimensional domains

    Daniel Karrasch and Nathanael Schilling. Fast and robust computation of coherent Lagrangian vortices on very large two-dimensional domains . The SMAI Journal of Computational Mathematics , 6:101--124, 2020

  34. [42]

    Hendon, Amy H

    Eun-Pa Lim, Harry H. Hendon, Amy H. Butler, David W. J. Thompson, Zachary D. Lawrence, Adam A. Scaife, Theodore G. Shepherd, Inna Polichtchouk, Hisashi Nakamura, Chiaki Kobayashi, Ruth Comer, Lawrence Coy, Andrew Dowdy, Rene D. Garreaud, Paul A. Newman, and Guomin Wang. The 20...

  35. [43]

    Lekien and S

    F. Lekien and S. D. Ross. The computation of finite-time Lyapunoc exponents on unstructured meshes and for non-Euclidean manifolds . Chaos , 20:017505, 2010

  36. [44]

    A dynamical model of the stratospheric sudden warming

    Taroh Matsuno. A dynamical model of the stratospheric sudden warming. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences , 28(8):1479 -- 1494, 1971

  37. [45]

    McIntyre

    M. McIntyre. How well do we understand the dynamics of stratospheric warmings? J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan , 60:37--65, 1982

  38. [46]

    M. E. McIntyre. On the Antartic ozone hole . J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. , 51:29--43, 1989

  39. [47]

    Molina and F

    Mario J. Molina and F. S. Rowland. Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature , 249(5460):810–812, June 1974

  40. [48]

    Mancho, Stephen Wiggins, Jezabel Curbelo, and Carolina Mendoza

    Ana M. Mancho, Stephen Wiggins, Jezabel Curbelo, and Carolina Mendoza. Lagrangian descriptors: A method for revealing phase space structures of general time dependent dynamical systems. Comm. Nonlin. Sci. Numer. Sim. , 18:3530--3557, 2013

  41. [49]

    Nash, Paul A

    Eric R. Nash, Paul A. Newman, Joan E. Rosenfield, and Mark R. Schoeberl. An objective determination of the polar vortex using Ertel’s potential vorticity . Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , 101(D5):9471–9478, April 1996

  42. [50]

    Spectral early-warning signals for sudden changes in time-dependent flow patterns

    Moussa Ndour, Kathrin Padberg-Gehle, and Martin Rasmussen. Spectral early-warning signals for sudden changes in time-dependent flow patterns. Fluids , 6:49, 2021

  43. [51]

    Ngan and T

    K. Ngan and T. G. Shepherd. A closer look at chaotic advection in the stratosphere. P art I : G eometric structure. J. Atmos. Sci. , 56:4,134--4,152, 1999

  44. [52]

    J. M. Ottino. The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos and Transport . Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989

  45. [53]

    Stratospheric modelling and assimilation

    Inna Polichtchouk, Peter Bechtold, Massimo Bonavita, Richard Forbes, Sean Healy, Robin Hogan, Patrick Laloyaux, Michael Rennie, Tim Stockdale, Nils Wedi, Michail Diamantakis, Johannes Flemming, Stephen English, Lars Isaksen, Filip Vána, Sonja Gisinger, and Nicholas Byrne. Stra...

  46. [54]

    Polvani and Darryn W

    Lorenzo M. Polvani and Darryn W. Waugh. Upward wave activity flux as a precursor to extreme stratospheric events and subsequent anomalous surface weather regimes. Journal of Climate , 17(18):3548 -- 3554, 2004

  47. [55]

    I. I. Rypina, M. G. Brown, F. J. Beron-Vera, H. Kocak, M. J. Olascoaga, and I. A. Udovydchenkov. On the L agrangian dynamics of atmospheric zonal jets and the permeability of the stratospheric polar vortex. J. Atmos. Sci. , 64:3595--3610, 2007

  48. [56]

    I. I. Rypina, M. G. Brown, F. J. Beron-Vera, H. Ko c ak, M. J. Olascoaga, and I. A. Udovydchenkov. Robust transport barriers resulting from strong Kolmogorov--Arnold--Moser stability . Phys. Rev. Lett. , 98:104102, 2007

  49. [57]

    Serra and G

    M. Serra and G. Haller. Objective Eulerian coherent structures . Chaos , 26:053110, 2016

  50. [58]

    T. G. Shepherd. The middel atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sol.--Terr. Phys. , 62:1587--1601, 2000

  51. [59]

    T. G. Shepherd, J. N. Koshyk, and K. Ngan. On the nature of large-scale mixing in the stratosphere and mesosphere. J. Geophys. Res. , 105:12433--12466, 2000

  52. [60]

    S. Solomon. Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history . Rev. Geophys. , 37:275--316, 1999

  53. [61]

    Speziale

    Charles G. Speziale. A review of material frame-indifference in mechanics. Applied Mechanics Reviews , 51:489–504, 1998

  54. [62]

    Shepherd, I

    T.G. Shepherd, I. Polichtchouk, Robin Hogan, and A.J. Simmons. Report on stratosphere task force. ECMWF Technical Memoranda 824, https://www.ecmwf.int/node/18259, doi:10.21957/0vkp0t1xx, 2018

  55. [63]

    Shepherd, T., R

    G. Shepherd, T., R. A. Plumb, and S. C. Wofsy. Preface. J. Atmos. Sci. , 62:565--566, 2005

  56. [64]

    Serra, P

    M. Serra, P. Sathe, F. J. Beron-Vera, and G. Haller. Uncovering the edge of the polar vortex. J. Atoms. Sci. , 74:3871--3885, 2017

  57. [65]

    Stewartson

    K. Stewartson. The evolution of the critical layer of a Rossby wave . Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn , 9:185--200, 1978

  58. [66]

    Tsitouras

    Ch. Tsitouras. Runge--Kutta pairs of order 5(4) satisfying only the first column simplifying assumption . Computers & Mathematics with Applications , 62:770–775, 2011

  59. [67]

    Y. Wang, M. J. Olascoaga, and F. J. Beron-Vera. Coherent water transport across the South Atlantic . Geophys. Res. Lett. , 42:4072--4079, 2015

  60. [68]

    Y. Wang, M. J. Olascoaga, and F. J. Beron-Vera. The life cycle of a coherent Lagrangian Agulhas ring . J. Geophys. Res. , 121:3944--3954, 2016

  61. [69]

    D. W. Waugh and L. M. Polvani. Stratospheric polar vortices. In L. M Polvani, A. H. Sobel, and D. W. Waugh, editors, The Stratosphere: Dynamics, Chemistry and Transport , volume 190 of Geophys. Monogr. , pages 43--57, Washington DC, 2010. American Geophysical Union

  62. [70]

    Warn and H

    T. Warn and H. Warn. The evolution of a nonlinear critical level. Stud. Appl. Math. , 59:37--71, 1978

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.