Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 49 references

Dynamics and connectivity of an extended arch filament system

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper identifies an extended arch filament system that ties moving magnetic features of a decaying sunspot to opposite-polarity quiet-Sun network flux and shows footpoint downflows rising from about 10 to 23 km/s in 30 minutes.

desk verdict A careful multi-wavelength case study of an unusual arch filament system connecting a decaying sunspot's moving magnetic features to quiet-Sun network flux; the main quantitative claim (footpoint downflows increasing from ~10 to ~23 km/s) rests on a single hand-picked pixel, so treat the trend as suggestive rather than established. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01510 v1 pith:C7N3DA2F submitted 2019-08-05 astro-ph.SR

Andrea Diercke , Christoph Kuckein , Carsten Denker This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords archfilamentsystemsunspotdecaymovingmagneticfeaturesquiet-SunnetworkchromosphericdynamicsDopplervelocitiesfluxtransfersupergranule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a chromospheric arch filament system that breaks the textbook pattern: its loops do not connect two freshly emerged pores but instead connect moving magnetic features shed by a decaying sunspot to opposite-polarity magnetic flux in the quiet-Sun network at the edge of a supergranule. Because this configuration differs from a classical arch filament system, the authors classify it as an “extended arch filament system” and analyze its structure and motions with Hα, Hβ, near-infrared Ca II, and EUV context data. The key dynamical measurement is that line-of-sight downflows at the footpoints grow over 30 minutes, from about $(9.8\pm 0.6)$ km s$^{-1}$ to $(22.8\pm 0.6)$ km s$^{-1}$ in Hα, with the southern footpoint consistently faster and some profiles showing a second, even more redshifted component. If correct, the result provides a directly observed route by which magnetic flux carried away from a decaying sunspot is transferred to the surrounding network, connecting sunspot decay to quiet-Sun field evolution.

What carries the argument

The central object is the extended arch filament system, a bundle of dark chromospheric threads in Hα absorption that connect opposite magnetic polarities. The paper’s classification rests on comparing it with the classical arch filament system: here the footpoints are moving magnetic features around a decaying sunspot and quiet-Sun network flux, not emerging pores. The measurement that carries the argument is pixel-by-pixel Doppler mapping: a second-order polynomial fit to the Hα and near-infrared Ca II line cores yields line-of-sight velocities, and the temporal increase of the redshift at the southern footpoint is the central result. Context from photospheric magnetograms establishes the polarities at the two footpoints and the slow decrease of the southern footpoint flux, while EUV images place the migrating brightening in time.

What would settle it

A direct test is a multi-hour high-sensitivity spectropolarimetric observation of the same type of system: if the southern footpoint polarity is not negative, or if the downflow does not grow from about 10 to 23 km s$^{-1}$ and no second component appears, the central interpretation would be refuted. A simpler statistical check is to survey decaying sunspots with photospheric magnetograms and Hα filtergrams to see whether such extended AFS configurations are frequent and whether their footpoint downflows always strengthen with time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On 2013 January 20 the filament system near active region 11658 was seen to bridge positive-polarity moving magnetic features just outside the sunspot penumbra and negative-polarity network flux along a supergranule border. This is not a classical arch filament system, which forms above an emerging flux region and connects two opposite-polarity pores with no link to the surrounding network, so the authors call it an extended arch filament system. It measures roughly 25–30 Mm in length and 20 Mm in width, with individual threads about 3 Mm wide, and the system persisted for several days while individual arch filaments lived more than an hour. Doppler maps from line-core fits to Hα and near-infrared Ca II show upflows at the loop tops that decay over time, while downflows at the southern footpoint increase from $(9.8\pm 0.6)$ km s$^{-1}$ to $(22.8\pm 0.6)$ km s$^{-1}$ over 30 minutes, exceeding the chromospheric sound speed; the northern footpoint stays slower and weaker. An EUV brightening appeared at 17:20 UT in one newly formed arch filament and moved from the northern to the southern footpoint, and shortly afterward strong redshifts and a second spectral component appeared at the southern footpoint, which the authors interpret as plasma draining downward from a rising loop.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation assumes that the dark Hα and Ca II threads are magnetic loops connecting the specific positive-polarity moving magnetic features to the negative-polarity network flux at the southern footpoint; the paper itself states that the Ca II Stokes-V maps cannot definitively define a clear polarity inversion line, so the connectivity rests on photospheric magnetograms and structure morphology.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sunspot magnetic flux carried away as moving magnetic features can connect to quiet-Sun network flux through an arch filament system, so network flux growth at supergranule borders can be a direct product of sunspot decay.
  • Footpoint downflows in such systems can double in 30 minutes and pass the chromospheric sound speed, so velocity maps need two-component spectral analysis rather than single line-core fits.
  • Downflow asymmetry between the two footpoints can grow rapidly, rather than being strongest at the birth of the system as reported for young arch filaments.
  • Hβ can stand in for Hα as a blue-wavelength tracer of chromospheric filamentary structure, though individual threads are less clearly resolved.
  • A system classified as an arch filament system can exist in a region of decreasing rather than emerging flux, with the southern footpoint losing flux at about $2.8\times10^{18}$ Mx h$^{-1}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this configuration is common around decaying sunspots, the brightenings and drainages seen here may be small-scale flux-cancellation events that quietly transfer active-region flux into the network; the paper does not quantify the global rate, so this is an extrapolation.
  • The second spectral component, estimated near 48 km s$^{-1}$ in Hα and appearing about 5 minutes later in Ca II, could be resolved with denser wavelength sampling to test whether it is a separate draining plasma blob or a line-core fitting artifact.
  • A longer time series should show the downflows eventually relaxing after the activation, as seen in other arch filament studies; only the increasing phase was captured here.
  • The same multi-line Doppler method could be applied to other decaying sunspots to test whether a growing downflow asymmetry between footpoints is a generic signature of flux transfer from a sunspot to the network.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-instrument observational study of a filament system observed on 2013 January 20 with the Dunn Solar Telescope (ROSA and IBIS) and SDO/AIA/HMI. The authors classify the system as an 'extended arch filament system' connecting moving magnetic features (MMFs) around a decaying sunspot to opposite-polarity network flux along a supergranular border. They derive LOS velocities from Hα and NIR Ca II line-core fits, finding upflows at loop tops and downflows at footpoints, with the southern footpoint downflow increasing from about 9.8 to 22.8 km/s in 30 minutes and a developing second spectral component. They also report an EUV brightening migrating from the northern to southern footpoint, flux decrease at the southern footpoint, and compare properties with classical AFSs.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the paper extends AFS classification to decaying sunspot environments and demonstrates a possible pathway for sunspot flux transport to the quiet-Sun network. The study is carefully reduced: the data reduction and calibration are described in detail, per-pixel uncertainty maps are provided (99th percentile 1.8 km/s for Hα, 1.1 km/s for NIR Ca II), and limitations (noisy Stokes-V, sparse wavelength sampling for the second component, short time series) are explicitly acknowledged. The comparison with classical AFS literature is quantitative and useful. The main advance is the observation of a strongly asymmetric, accelerating downflow at one footpoint during a 30-minute activation, but this claim currently rests on a measurement procedure that needs to be made more robust.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sect. 4.5, Figs. 9 and 10] The central quantitative claim that Hα downflows at the southern footpoint increase from (9.8±0.6) to (22.8±0.6) km s−1 is based on single-line-core fits in a region where the spectral profiles develop a second red component (Fig. 10a, point p1). The increasing redshift of the single-line-core fit can be driven by the growth of the second component (roughly estimated at 48 km s−1) rather than by an acceleration of the main plasma component. Please perform a two-component fit (e.g., two Gaussians) to separate the components and show whether the first-component velocity genuinely increases, or report spatially averaged velocities over a fixed aperture that excludes the second-component pixels. Without such a test, the physical interpretation of an accelerating downflow is not yet established.
  2. [Sect. 4.5, Fig. 9] The procedure for extracting the quoted maximum velocities is not specified. The velocity maps are clipped at ±7.5 km s−1, and the text refers to 'maximum velocities' without stating whether these are the global maximum over the footpoint region, the value at the fixed point p1, or the maximum in the saturated area. The paper should define the aperture/pixel used, and provide a time series of robust statistics (e.g., median or 95th percentile within a fixed footpoint box) to demonstrate that the increase is not a single-pixel extreme-value effect. The growing area of the saturated region alone does not bias the global maximum, but the lack of a clear measurement definition and the presence of second-component pixels make the quoted peak values difficult to interpret.
  3. [Sect. 3.3] The reported uncertainties on the maximum velocities (e.g., ±0.6 km s−1) are formal line-core-fit uncertainties. The authors state that changing the number of wavelength points by ±1 changes the derived velocities by 10% (Hα) and 12% (NIR Ca II); this systematic term is larger than the quoted error bars at the reported velocities (e.g., roughly 1–2.3 km s−1 for 10–23 km s−1). Please include the systematic uncertainty in the quoted values or give a separate estimate, and propagate it into the discussion of whether the 13 km s−1 increase is significant. Also clarify the relationship between the per-pixel uncertainty maps (99th percentile 1.79 km s−1) and the peak-value uncertainties.
  4. [Sect. 4.1] The classification as an 'extended AFS' and the paper's connectivity claim depend on the assertion that the observed Hα/Ca II structures are loops connecting positive-polarity MMFs near the sunspot with negative-polarity network flux at the southern footpoint. The paper itself notes that the NIR Ca II Stokes-V maps are 'not suitable to definitively define a clear polarity inversion line' (Sect. 4.1), and the footpoint regions contain mixed polarities. Please strengthen the connectivity evidence, for example by tracking the MMFs and footpoint polarities in the HMI time series, checking whether the EUV loops in AIA 171/193 connect the same footpoints, or performing a simple potential-field extrapolation. At minimum, discuss the alternative that the dark structure is a filament lying along a PIL rather than a loop system connecting the specific opposite-polarity patches.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sect. 4.5] The statement 'The number of poor fits is 0.01%' is hard to reconcile with the many pixels marked by black contours as having two components; please define what constitutes a poor fit and state whether line-core fits were still performed in the two-component regions.
  2. [Sect. 4.5, Fig. 9] Consider showing the unclipped velocity values in the saturated regions using a different color scale or contours, so that the peak values are visually summarized.
  3. [Sect. 5] When stating that 'the up- and downflow velocities exceed the sound speed in the chromosphere,' please state the adopted sound speed and note that the measured velocities are LOS projections.
  4. [Sect. 6] There is a typo 'unusal' for 'unusual'; also 'Nontheless' appears in Sect. 5.
  5. [Sect. 4.5] The caution about a prominent shoulder in the red wing is stated for NIR Ca II but applies equally to Hα; please make this explicit.
  6. [Table 1] The row 'Footpoints' is ambiguous ('footpoints drifting apart' vs 'MMFs move toward other footpoint'); please clarify the intended comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the observational claims are derived from calibrated measurements and external comparisons, not from their own definitions or fits.

full rationale

This is a purely observational case study with no parametric model or fitted quantity that is later relabeled as a prediction. The central claims—that the filament system connects MMFs around a decaying sunspot to opposite-polarity network flux and that H-alpha downflows at the southern footpoint increase from about 9.8 to 22.8 km/s—are supported by direct measurements: line-core fitting calibrated to the FTS atlas and laboratory rest wavelengths, HMI magnetograms, AIA context images, and multi-instrument morphology. The 'extended AFS' label is explicitly introduced as a descriptive classification based on deviation from the classical AFS definition, not used as an input to derive the velocities or connectivity. Comparisons with classical AFS properties rely on independent published values (e.g., Bruzek 1967, 1969; Gonzalez Manrique et al. 2018). Self-citations appear for data-reduction software (sTools, Kuckein et al. 2017; MFGS implementation, Denker et al. 2018) and prior AFS work by the same group, but none of these citations supplies the load-bearing evidence for the paper's conclusions; the cited software is a tool, and the cited AFS studies are external observational comparisons. The reported velocity increase is a measurement-robustness concern (single-pixel maximum, clipped maps, possible growth of the redshifted area) rather than a circularity: those concerns do not make the result equivalent to its inputs by construction. No equation in the paper reduces a derived quantity to a fitted or assumed quantity, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the classification or the velocities. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an observational study without a parametric model. The central measurements are derived with standard line-core fitting and magnetogram analysis. No new free parameters, such as fitted physical constants, are introduced; the only hand-chosen analysis parameters are the polynomial fit widths, which affect velocity uncertainties but not the physical interpretation. The main assumptions are standard solar-physics domain assumptions about spectral line formation and the comparison of magnetic maps at different heights.

free parameters (1)
  • Line-core polynomial fit width = 0.72 Å (Hα), 0.24 Å (Ca II)
    Chosen by hand for the second-order polynomial fits used to infer LOS velocities (Sect. 3.3). Varying the number of wavelength points by ±1 changes velocities by 10-12%, so this choice adds systematic uncertainty but is not a model parameter fitted to the target data.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math The rest wavelengths λ0=6562.81 Å (Hα) and λ0=8542.14 Å (Ca II) from Moore et al. (1966) convert line shifts to LOS velocities.
    Invoked in Sect. 3.3 and 4.5 to compute Doppler velocities from line-core shifts.
  • domain assumption The Hα and Ca II line cores form in the chromosphere, and line-of-sight Doppler shifts trace the plasma motion of the arch filaments.
    Used throughout Sect. 4.4-4.5 to interpret blueshifts as upflows and redshifts as downflows; the paper notes the µ≈0.9 projection caveat.
  • domain assumption Averaged IBIS Stokes-V maps and HMI photospheric magnetograms can be compared across atmospheric layers to infer the magnetic connectivity of the filament footpoints.
    Invoked in Sect. 4.6, where the lack of a clear chromospheric polarity inversion line in Stokes-V is compensated by using photospheric HMI maps to identify the footpoint polarities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamics and connectivity of an extended arch filament system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C7N3DA2F

@misc{pith2026190801510,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamics and connectivity of an extended arch filament system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C7N3DA2F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01510}
}
abstract

In this study, we analyzed a filament system, which expanded between moving magnetic features (MMFs) of a decaying sunspot and opposite flux outside of the active region from the nearby quiet-Sun network. This configuration deviated from a classical arch filament system (AFS), which typically connects two pores in an emerging flux region. Thus, we called this system an extended AFS. We contrasted classical and extended AFSs with an emphasis on the complex magnetic structure of the latter. Furthermore, we examined the physical properties of the extended AFS and described its dynamics and connectivity. At the southern footpoint, we measured that the flux decreases over time. We find strong downflow velocities at the footpoints of the extended AFS, which increase in a time period of 30 minutes. The velocities are asymmetric at both footpoints with higher velocities at the southern footpoint. The extended AFS was observed with two instruments at the Dunn Solar Telescope (DST). The Rapid Oscillations in the Solar Atmosphere (ROSA) imager provided images in three different wavelength regions. The Interferometric Bidimensional Spectropolarimeter (IBIS) provided spectroscopic H$\alpha$ data and spectropolarimetric data that was obtained in the near-infrared Ca II 8542 \AA\ line. We used He II 304 \AA\ extreme ultraviolet images of the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) and LOS magnetograms of the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) as context data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01510 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of observed target on 2013 January 20. (a) Detailed view of active region NOAA 11658 at 17:35:55 UT observed in the EUV at λ304 Å. The sunspot is located in the middle of the FOV. The solid yellow box indicates the FOV of IBIS and the dashed yellow box indicates the FOV of ROSA. Both contain the targeted extended AFS. (b) Averaged magnetogram between 14:00 UT and 22:00 UT. (c) Schematic overview of NOAA 116… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Best ROSA images on 2013 January 20: (a) G-band image showing the photosphere at 17:21:39 UT, where some restoration artifacts are visible at the borders. (b) Ca ii K image depicting the upper photosphere and lower chromosphere at 17:21:34 UT. (c) Hβ image displaying the chromosphere at 17:21:22 UT. The arrows indicate the direction of solar north and west. Stokes parameters. The Hα data are only spectroscopic obser… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Image quality of G-band images derived with the MFGS method for the entire observing period. The red curve refers to calibrated G￾band images, whereas the blue profile corresponds to MFGS values af￾ter image restoration. At around 18:21 UT the target changed from the arch filament system to the nearby sunspot. 3.2. Data reduction of IBIS spectropolarimetric observations The IBIS data reduction pipeline is described … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Line scan of Hα at 17:22:08 UT during best seeing conditions1 . The scans include the line-wing positions Hα ± 0.75 Å, Hα ± 0.5 Å, and Hα ± 0.25 Å and the line-core image (λ0 = 6562.86 Å). The position within the line scan is indicated in the upper right corner of each…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Line scan of NIR Ca ii at 17:21:42 UT during best seeing conditions1 . The scans show filtergrams at the wavelength positions Ca ii ± 0.75 Å, Ca ii ± 0.25 Å, and Ca ii ± 0.15 Å and the line-core filtergram (λ0 = 8542.21 Å). The line core is located in the chromosphere,…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of the extended AFS observed with different in￾struments. (a) ROSA Hβ image with contours of G-band bright points (green). (b) IBIS Hα line-core filtergram with contours of the positive (red) and negative (blue) LOS magnetic field from HMI between ±50 G and …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Temporal evolution of the extended AFS in the chromosphere in selected Hα line-core filtergrams (top) and in NIR Ca ii line-core filtergrams (bottom) for a time-series starting at 17:02 UT until 17:58 UT on 2013 January 20. The labels α, β, and γ indicate three individ…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Hα line-core image and Doppler velocity maps (b) at 17:22:08 UT, (c) at 17:42:17 UT, and (d) at 17:52:32 UT. All velocity maps are clipped between ±7.5 km s−1 , i.e., the saturated white regions denote velocities exceeding this limit. The points p1 – p4 refer to re…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Temporal evolution of the Hα (top) and NIR Ca ii (bottom) observed spectra at points p1 – p4 (left to right). The color of the spectral profiles corresponds to the observing time given by the scale on the right. 0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 y−direction [arcsec…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) NIR Ca ii line-core image and Doppler velocity maps (b) at 17:22:16 UT, (c) at 17:42:25 UT, and (d) at 17:52:05 UT. All velocity maps are clipped between ±7.5 km s−1 . The points p1 – p4 denote regions, which we examine in detail. The black contours, indicated by …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Magnetic field of the extended AFS. (a) Single-integration IBIS Stokes-V/Ic map de￾rived from the NIR Ca ii line at 17:52:39 UT and (b) one-hour average of IBIS Stokes-V/Ic maps scaled between V/Ic = ±0.005. (c) Two￾hour average HMI magnetogram clipped between ±150 G,…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J., et al

    Balthasar, H., Gömöry, P., González Manrique, S. J., et al. 2016, Astron. Nachr., 337, 1050

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    & Livingston, W

    Bhatnagar, A. & Livingston, W. 2005, Fundamentals of Solar Astronomy, World Scientific Series in Astronomy and Astrophysics (Singapore: World Scien- tific)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Brault, J. W. 1985, in High Resolution in Astronomy, Fifteenth Advanced Course of the Swiss Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics. Edited by A.O. Benz, M. Huber, and M. Mayer. Geneva Observatory, Sauverny, Switzerland, 3–61

    work page 1985

  4. [4]

    Bray, R. J. & Loughhead, R. E. 1974, The Solar Chromosphere (London, UK: Chapman and Hall)

    work page 1974

  5. [5]

    1967, Sol

    Bruzek, A. 1967, Sol. Phys., 2, 451

    work page 1967

  6. [6]

    1969, Sol

    Bruzek, A. 1969, Sol. Phys., 8, 29

    work page 1969

  7. [7]

    1995, Astrophys

    Caligari, P., Moreno-Insertis, F., & Schussler, M. 1995, Astrophys. J., 441, 886

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    C., & Fisher, G

    Cauzzi, G., Canfield, R. C., & Fisher, G. H. 1996, Astrophys. J., 456, 850

    work page 1996

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    2006, Sol

    Cavallini, F. 2006, Sol. Phys., 236, 415

    2006

  2. [10]

    2005, Astrophys

    Chae, J., Moon, Y .-J., & Park, Y .-D. 2005, Astrophys. J., 626, 574

    2005

  3. [11]

    & Zirin, H

    Chou, D.-Y . & Zirin, H. 1988, Astrophys. J., 333, 420

    1988

  4. [12]

    T., et al

    Couvidat, S., Schou, J., Hoeksema, J. T., et al. 2016, Sol. Phys., 291, 1887

    2016

  5. [13]

    & Tritschler, A

    Criscuoli, S. & Tritschler, A. 2014, IBIS Data Reduction Notes, National Solar Observatory (NSO), New Mexico, USA de la Cruz Rodríguez, J., Löfdahl, M. G., Sütterlin, P., Hillberg, T., & Rouppe van der V oort, L. 2015, Astron. Astrophys., 573, A40

    2014

  6. [14]

    2015, Sol

    Deng, H., Zhang, D., Wang, T., et al. 2015, Sol. Phys., 290, 1479

    2015

  7. [15]

    2018, Sol

    Denker, C., Dineva, E., Balthasar, H., et al. 2018, Sol. Phys., 293, 44

    2018

  8. [16]

    2018, Astron

    Diercke, A., Kuckein, C., Verma, M., & Denker, C. 2018, Astron. Astrophys., 611, A64 Druckmüller, M. 2013, ApJS, 207, 25

    2018

  9. [17]

    1909, Mon

    Evershed, J. 1909, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 69, 454

    1909

  10. [18]

    Frazier, E. N. 1972, Sol. Phys., 26, 130

    1972

  11. [19]

    Gonzalez, R. C. & Woods, R. E. 2002, Digital Image Processing (Upper Saddle

    2002

  12. [20]

    J., Bello González, N., & Denker, C

    River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall) González Manrique, S. J., Bello González, N., & Denker, C. 2017a, Astron. As- trophys., 600, A38 González Manrique, S. J., Denker, C., Kuckein, C., et al. 2017b, in IAU Sym- posium, V ol. 327, Fine Structure and Dynamics of the Solar Atmo...

    2018

  13. [21]

    & Harvey, J

    Harvey, K. & Harvey, J. 1973, Sol. Phys., 28, 61

    1973

  14. [22]

    2007, Astron

    Ishikawa, R., Tsuneta, S., Kitakoshi, Y ., et al. 2007, Astron. Astrophys., 472, 911

    2007

  15. [23]

    B., Mathioudakis, M., Christian, D

    Jess, D. B., Mathioudakis, M., Christian, D. J., et al. 2010, Sol. Phys., 261, 363

    2010

  16. [24]

    G., Tritschler, A., Uitenbroek, H., et al

    Judge, P. G., Tritschler, A., Uitenbroek, H., et al. 2010, Astrophys. J., 710, 1486

    2010

  17. [25]

    2017, Astrophys

    Kleint, L. 2017, Astrophys. J., 834, 26

    2017

  18. [26]

    2009, Astron

    Kuckein, C., Centeno, R., Martínez Pillet, V ., et al. 2009, Astron. Astrophys., 501, 1113

    2009

  19. [27]

    2017, in IAU Symposium, V ol

    Kuckein, C., Denker, C., Verma, M., et al. 2017, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 327, Fine Structure and Dynamics of the Solar Atmosphere, ed. S. Vargas Domínguez, A. G. Kosovichev, P. Antolin, & L. Harra, 20–24

    2017

  20. [28]

    2012, Astron

    Kuckein, C., Martínez Pillet, V ., & Centeno, R. 2012, Astron. Astrophys., 542, A112

    2012

  21. [29]

    K., & Krupp, N

    Lagg, A., Woch, J., Solanki, S. K., & Krupp, N. 2007, Astron. Astrophys., 462, 1147

    2007

  22. [30]

    R., Title, A

    Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J.and Boerner, P. F., et al. 2012, Sol. Phys., 275, 17 Löfdahl, M. G. 2002, in Proc. SPIE, V ol. 4792, Image Reconstruction from In- complete Data, ed. P. J. Bones, M. A. Fiddy, & R. P. Millane, 146–155 Löhner-Böttcher, J. 2016, PhD thesis,...

    2012

  23. [31]

    2015, Astron

    Ma, L., Zhou, W., Zhou, G., & Zhang, J. 2015, Astron. Astrophys., 583, A110

    2015

  24. [32]

    H., Karpen, J

    Mackay, D. H., Karpen, J. T., Ballester, J. L., Schmieder, B., & Aulanier, G. 2010, Space Sci. Rev., 151, 333

    2010

  25. [33]

    Martin, S. F. 1998, Sol. Phys., 182, 107 Martínez Pillet, V . 2002, Astron. Nachr., 323, 342

    1998

  26. [34]

    A., Collados, M., Mathioudakis, M., & Erdelyi, R

    Matthews, S. A., Collados, M., Mathioudakis, M., & Erdelyi, R. 2016, in So- ciety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, 990809

    2016

  27. [35]

    E., Minnaert, M

    Moore, C. E., Minnaert, M. G. J., Houtgast, J., & Rowland, H. A. 1966, The Solar Spectrum 2935 Å to 8770 Å: Second Revision of Rowland’s Prelimi- nary Table of Solar Spectrum Wavelengths, V ol. 61 (Washington, D.C., USA: National Bureau of Standards)

    1966

  28. [36]

    2001, in Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed

    Muller, R. 2001, in Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed. P. Murdin (London, UK: IOP Publishing Ltd and Nature Publishing Group), 2254

    2001

  29. [37]

    D., Thompson, B

    Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J., & Chamberlin, P. C. 2012, Sol. Phys., 275, 3

    2012

  30. [38]

    Reardon, K. P. & Cavallini, F. 2008, Astron. Astrophys., 481, 897

    2008

  31. [39]

    Rimmele, T. R. 2004, in Proc. SPIE, V ol. 5490, Advancements in Adaptive Op- tics, ed. D. Bonaccini Calia, B. L. Ellerbroek, & R. Ragazzoni, 34–46

    2004

  32. [40]

    H., Schou, J., Bush, R

    Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., et al. 2012, Sol. Phys., 275, 207

    2012

  33. [41]

    & Title, A

    Shine, R. & Title, A. 2001, in Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed. P. Murdin (London, UK: IOP Publishing Ltd and Nature Publishing Group), 2038

    2001

  34. [42]

    2004, As- tron

    Spadaro, D., Billotta, S., Contarino, L., Romano, P., & Zuccarello, F. 2004, As- tron. Astrophys., 425, 309

    2004

  35. [43]

    2004, The Sun: An Introduction (Berlin, Germany: Springer)

    Stix, M. 2004, The Sun: An Introduction (Berlin, Germany: Springer)

    2004

  36. [44]

    & Bello González, N

    Strecker, H. & Bello González, N. 2018, Astron. Astrophys., 620, A122

    2018

  37. [45]

    2001, in Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed

    Tandberg-Hanssen, E. 2001, in Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed. P. Murdin (London, UK: IOP Publishing Ltd and Nature Publishing Group), 2277

    2001

  38. [46]

    R., Beruko ff, S., et al

    Tritschler, A., Rimmele, T. R., Beruko ff, S., et al. 2015, in Cambridge Work- shop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, V ol. 18, 18th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, 933–944

    2015

  39. [47]

    A., Alissandrakis, C

    Tsiropoula, G., Georgakilas, A. A., Alissandrakis, C. E., & Mein, P. 1992, As- tron. Astrophys., 262, 587 van Noort, M., Rouppe van der V oort, L., & Löfdahl, M. G. 2005, Sol. Phys., 228, 191

    1992

  40. [48]

    1972, Sol

    Zirin, H. 1972, Sol. Phys., 22, 34

    1972

  41. [49]

    1974, in IAU Symposium, V ol

    Zirin, H. 1974, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 56, Chromospheric Fine Structure, ed. R. G. Athay, 161 Article number, page 14 of 14

    1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.