Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 47 references

Chebyshev polynomials on a Jordan arc

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that for any analytic Jordan arc $\gamma$, the normalized Chebyshev norm $W_n(\gamma)$ converges to $1/\rho(\infty)$, with matching Szegő–Widom asymptotics for the polynomials.

desk verdict Settles the Widom/CSZ conjecture for analytic Jordan arcs; the main theorem is solid, and the one soft spot is a quoted sampling inequality in the secondary Szegő–Widom theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13445 v1 pith:C7S3AHLU submitted 2026-08-13 math.CA math.CV

Benedikt Buchecker , Benjamin Eichinger , Olof Rubin , Aron Wennman This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CAmath.CV MSC 41A5030E1530C1042C05
keywords ChebyshevpolynomialsSzegő–WidomasymptoticsFaberextremalsignaturesWidomfactorsdiscreteorthogonalJordanarcMarcinkiewicz–Zygmundinequality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the large-degree size of Chebyshev polynomials on any analytic Jordan arc is governed by one explicitly defined outer function $\rho$. The normalized norm $W_n(\gamma)=\|T_n\|_\gamma/\operatorname{Cap}(\gamma)^n$ converges to $1/\rho(\infty)$, confirming the Christiansen–Simon–Zinchenko revision of a 1969 conjecture of Widom. The same construction yields Szegő–Widom asymptotics away from the arc: $T_n(z)=\operatorname{Cap}(\gamma)^n g(z)\phi(z)^n(1+O(\log n/n))$ with $g=\rho/\rho(\infty)$, and $L^2(\gamma,|dz|)$ error $O(\log n/n)$. The result matters because it settles the basic limiting Widom factor outside the real line and shows the $H^2$ and $H^\infty$ extremal problems share the same extremal function.

What carries the argument

The central object is the outer function $\rho$, whose boundary moduli $|\rho_\pm|=|\phi'_\pm|/(|\phi'_+|+|\phi'_-|)$ record the share of one-sided harmonic-measure density on the two sides of the arc, together with its normalized version $g=\rho/\rho(\infty)$. The upper bound is carried by weighted Faber polynomials $F_n(g,z)$, the polynomial part of the Laurent expansion of $g(z)\phi(z)^n$; along the arc these oscillate between the sum and difference envelopes $|g_+|+|g_-|$ and $||g_+|-|g_-||$, and minimizing the upper envelope over admissible functions is an explicit extremal problem whose unique solution is $g=\rho/\rho(\infty)$. The lower bound is built from extremal signatures (optimal prediction measures) placed on the $n+1$ maximal points of the oscillating Faber expression, analyzed through dual Faber polynomials whose zeros are those extremal points, and a Marcinkiewicz–Zygmund sampling inequality transfers the resulting discrete bounds to $L^2(\gamma,|dz|)$.

What would settle it

On the circular arc $\gamma_\alpha=\{e^{i\theta}:|\theta|\le\alpha\}$, the theorem predicts the limiting Widom factor $2\cos^2(\alpha/4)$; computing the Chebyshev norms numerically for a few values of $\alpha$ and comparing against this number, or checking whether the pointwise asymptotics hold at a fixed interior point, would settle the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 states that for every analytic Jordan arc $\gamma$, $\lim_{n\to\infty} W_n(\gamma)=1/\rho(\infty)$, where $\rho$ is the outer function with boundary moduli $|\rho_\pm|=|\phi'_\pm|/(|\phi'_+|+|\phi'_-|)$ on the two sides of the arc; equivalently, $\log\rho(\infty)$ is the entropy integral of $|\rho_+|$ with respect to the two-sided harmonic measure at infinity. Theorem 1.2 gives the matching Szegő–Widom asymptotics: locally uniformly off $\gamma$, $T_n(z)=\operatorname{Cap}(\gamma)^n g(z)\phi(z)^n(1+O(\log n/n))$, where $g=\rho/\rho(\infty)$, and $\|T_n/\operatorname{Cap}(\gamma)^n-(g_+\phi_+^n+g_-\phi_-^n)\|_{L^2(\gamma,|dz|)}=O(\log n/n)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the imported Marcinkiewicz–Zygmund sampling inequality, which must hold uniformly in $n$ for the $n+1$ extremal points and pass from discrete point evaluations to $L^2(\gamma,|dz|)$ control with only a logarithmic loss, and whose underlying interpolation lemma is quoted with some details left to the reader.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any analytic Jordan arc, the limiting Widom factor lies in $(1,2]$, equals $2$ only for a line segment, and tends to $1$ in the closed-curve limit.
  • The Chebyshev polynomials themselves obey Szegő–Widom asymptotics off the arc, so their growth and zero distribution are ultimately controlled by the outer function $\rho$ and the exterior conformal map $\phi$.
  • The $H^2$ and $H^\infty$ extremal problems behind the two Widom factors have the same extremal function $g=\rho/\rho(\infty)$, explaining why the conjecture holds.
  • The upper bound already holds for $C^{2+\alpha}$ arcs, and the proof accommodates continuous weights, changing the asymptotics by a Szegő-function factor.
  • The proof scheme gives a partial replacement for the alternation and stability mechanisms available on the real line, applicable to other optimal approximation problems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sampling inequality survives for less regular arcs, the same outer-function formula should give the limit for $C^{2+\alpha}$ or piecewise analytic arcs, with endpoint corrections entering only the error terms.
  • The dual Faber polynomial construction points to a general complex analogue of the Chebyshev first/second-kind pair: the extremal points of the degree-$n$ polynomial are the zeros of an explicit degree-$(n+1)$ companion polynomial.
  • The $O(\log n)$ factor in the sampling inequality may be an artifact of the proof; a sharper sampling theorem for these specially spaced extremal points could improve the error rate in Theorem 1.2.
  • For several disjoint arcs, the same variational framework suggests describing limit points of $W_n$ through an outer function with several boundary-value ratios, though the paper itself notes new ideas are needed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves the Christiansen–Simon–Zinchenko conjecture for analytic Jordan arcs: the Widom factor W_n(γ) = ||T_n||_γ / Cap(γ)^n converges to 1/ρ(∞), where ρ is the outer function whose boundary moduli on the two sides of γ are |ρ_±| = |φ'_±|/(|φ'_+| + |φ'_-|). It further establishes Szegő–Widom asymptotics for the Chebyshev polynomials themselves: T_n(z)/Cap(γ)^n equals g_+(z)φ_+(z)^n + g_-(z)φ_-(z)^n up to O(log n / n) in L²(γ,|dz|) and locally uniformly off γ, with g = ρ/ρ(∞). The proof combines weighted Faber polynomials and an explicit H^∞ extremal problem for the upper bound; the lower bound uses extremal signatures and optimal prediction measures, a dual Faber polynomial whose zeros are exponentially close to the extremal points, and an explicitly solved jump problem. The final Szegő–Widom result uses a Marcinkiewicz–Zygmund sampling inequality of Chui–Zhong type.

Significance. If correct, this resolves a long-standing conjecture of Widom and of Christiansen–Simon–Zinchenko, giving the first complete asymptotic description of Chebyshev polynomials on a single smooth arc. The explicit solution of the limiting H^∞ extremal problem (Theorem 3.3) is elegant and makes the limit purely geometric, expressed through an outer function that is not fitted to the Chebyshev norms. The dual Faber construction (Section 4.2) is a novel technique with clear potential for other extremal problems. The proof of the conjecture itself (Theorem 1.1) is essentially self-contained: its lower bound rests on the Vidensky formula and the exponential zero-attraction argument in Lemma 4.7, not on the sampling inequality. The paper also explains the mechanism behind the conjecture in Remark 3.5 by linking the H^2 and H^∞ extremal problems, which is a valuable conceptual contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [§5.2, Lemma 5.2; Appendix A, Lemma A.2] The uniform-in-n constant in the Marcinkiewicz–Zygmund inequality is load-bearing for Theorem 1.2. Lemma A.2 is quoted from [11, Lemma 2.3] with 'some details are left to the reader', and the required uniform pseudohyperbolic separation and Carleson measure estimates are cited from [47, Lemma 1] and [10, Lemma 5.2], which are proved for other arcs and point distributions. For the extremal points z_j of Lemma 4.3, whose local spacing is (1 + min{j,n-j})/n² by Lemma B.5, the paper does not verify the hypotheses needed for a constant C independent of n in the interpolation estimate. If the interpolation constant in Lemma A.2 grew with n, inequality (5.5) would fail, and the advertised L² error O(log n / n) and the locally uniform Szegő–Widom expansion in Theorem 1.2 would no longer follow. Please supply a complete proof of Lemma A.2 for the present setting, or a precise reference whose hypotheses are verified for these arcs and this point distribution. Theorem 1.1 is not affected, since its lower bound uses Lemma 4.7 instead of the sampling inequality.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eq. (3.4) and §4, Lemma 4.3] The function θ is defined as θ(z) := arg(φ_+(z)φ_-(z)), but the monotonicity statement and all subsequent uses require θ(z) = arg(φ_+(z)/φ_-(z)); on the arc the product of the two boundary values is identically 1. Please correct the typo in both places.
  2. [§5.3, Proposition 5.3] The endpoint case is dismissed with the remark that the asymptotics of E'_0 is multiplied by a factor 2 there; the computation is not shown. Since the factor 2 is used to claim the same formula for j=0,n, please include the short calculation or point to the precise equation where it is proved.
  3. [§4.2, first paragraph] There is a duplicated word in 'The reader may consult Figure 1 for for notation'; please edit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: 1/rho(infinity) is derived from conformal geometry and a solved extremal problem, with the lower bound produced by an explicit dual Faber construction rather than fitted to W_n.

full rationale

I found no step where a prediction reduces by definition to an input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a result. The limit 1/rho(infinity) is defined purely from the boundary values of phi' on the two sides of the analytic arc gamma (Eq. (1.3) area), not from the Chebyshev norms W_n. The upper bound solves an independent H^infinity extremal problem: minimize max_gamma(|g_+| + |g_-|) over g(infinity)=1; Theorem 3.3 proves, rather than assumes, that the minimizer is g = rho/rho(infinity), using subharmonicity and a uniqueness argument. The lower bound uses the Vidensky/optimal-prediction identity (4.4), W_n(gamma) >= (sum 1/|E'(z_j)|)^{-1}, and constructs E from the dual Faber polynomial E0 with weight f derived from an explicit jump problem (4.6)-(4.8); the factor 1/rho(infinity) in the derivative estimate |E'(z_j)| >= (n+1)/rho(infinity) - C is an output of Lemma 4.7, not an input. The Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund sampling inequality (Lemma 5.2) is imported from Chui-Zhong [11] and used only for Theorem 1.2; Appendix A contains a proof sketch but also states that 'some details are left to the reader'. This is a rigor/completeness concern for the Szego-Widom asymptotics, not a circularity, because the cited lemma is external and does not encode the target result. The authors' self-citations ([30], [33]) are background only and are not load-bearing for the central derivation. No equation in the paper is equivalent to the conjecture by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: rho(infinity) is a function of the arc's conformal geometry. The axioms are standard results in complex analysis, potential theory and harmonic analysis, plus two cited lemmas of Widom that the paper extends. The new objects, such as dual Faber polynomials and extremal point sets, are constructed and proven, not postulated, so no invented entities are listed.

assumptions (9)
  • standard math Riemann mapping theorem: existence and uniqueness of the exterior conformal map phi with phi'(infinity) = 1/Cap(K), used to define capacity and all Faber data.
    Section 2, first paragraph.
  • domain assumption Widom's opening-up construction: for an arc, z + sqrt(z^2 - 1) maps the complement to the exterior of an analytic Jordan curve D, splitting boundary values into two branches (Widom [46, Lemma 11.1]).
    Section 2, paragraph after (2.2).
  • domain assumption Faber polynomial asymptotic: for analytic g and the arc framework, F_n(g,z) = g+(z)phi+(z)^n + g-(z)phi-(z)^n + O(r^n), and for C^{2+alpha} arcs the error O(n^{-epsilon}) from [46, Lemma 11.2].
    Equations (2.4) and (3.2).
  • standard math Vidensky formula for Chebyshev polynomials on finite point sets, Theorem 4.1, proven in the paper by residue calculus.
    Section 4.1, proof included.
  • standard math Subharmonic mean-value inequality and its equality case, used to solve the extremal problem (3.5).
    Proof of Theorem 3.3.
  • domain assumption Carleson interpolation theorem and Shapiro-Shields H2 interpolation, with uniform-in-n separation and Carleson measure estimates from [47, Lemma 1] and [10, Lemma 5.2] (Lemma A.2).
    Appendix A.2.
  • domain assumption Boundedness of the Cauchy transform on Carleson curves (David), with norm controlled by the Muckenhoupt A2 characteristic (Lorist's A2 theorem), uniformly in n for the Green curves gamma_n (Lemma A.3).
    Appendix A.3, Lemmas A.3 and A.4.
  • domain assumption Regularity of the equilibrium and inverse equilibrium parametrizations of an analytic arc, used for the extremal point separation (Lemma B.5), from [17, Eq. (2.2)-(2.3), Lemma 2.1].
    Appendix B.2.
  • domain assumption Bernstein-Walsh type bound relating sup-norm growth to L2(gamma,|dz|)-norm and distance to gamma for degree-n polynomials, adapted from Levin-Lubinsky.
    Proof of Theorem 1.2, Section 5.4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chebyshev polynomials on a Jordan arc." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C7S3AHLU

@misc{pith2026260813445,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chebyshev polynomials on a Jordan arc},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C7S3AHLU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13445}
}
read the original abstract

We describe the asymptotics of Chebyshev polynomials on an analytic Jordan arc in the plane. This gives an affirmative answer to a conjecture of Christiansen-Simon-Zinchenko, based on predictions of Widom from 1969. The proof combines weighted Faber polynomials with extremal signatures, discrete orthogonal polynomials and a Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund sampling inequality, and yields Szeg\H{o}-Widom asymptotics for the Chebyshev polynomials themselves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13445 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram of the various exterior conformal mappings used through￾out the paper. We recognize the right-hand side of (2.3) as (essentially) the sum of two Faber polynomials on D with respect to the weights G and G/s evaluated at σ and σ −1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. I. Achieser. ¨Uber einige Funktionen, die in gegebenen Intervallen am wenigsten von Null abweichen. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 3 (1933), 499–536

    work page 1933

  2. [2]

    G. Alpan. Extremal polynomials on a Jordan arc. J. Approx. Theory 276 (2022) 105708

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Alpan and M

    G. Alpan and M. Zinchenko. On the Widom factors for Lp extremal polynomials. J. Ap- prox. Theory 259 (2020), 105480

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    T. C. Anderson and A. Vagharshakyan. A Simple Proof of the Sharp Weighted Estimate for Calder´ on–Zygmund Operators on Homogeneous Spaces. J. Geom. Anal. 24 (2014), 1276–1297

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Andrievskii

    V. Andrievskii. On Chebyshev polynomials in the complex plane. Acta Math. Hungar. 152 (2017), no. 2, 505–524

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    S. N. Bernstein. D´ emonstration du th´ eor` eme de Weierstrass fond´ ee sur le calcul des proba- bilit´ es. Comm. Kharkov Math. Soc. 13 (1912), 1–2

    work page 1912

  7. [7]

    B¨ ottcher and Y

    A. B¨ ottcher and Y. I. Karlovich. Carleson Curves, Muckenhoupt Weights, and Toeplitz Operators. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 154, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel/Boston/Berlin,

    work page

  8. [8]

    L. Bos, N. Levenberg and J. Ortega–Cerd` a. Optimal polynomial prediction measures and extremal polynomial growth. Const. Approx. 54, 431–453 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    P. L. Chebyshev. Th´ eorie des m´ ecanismes connus sous le nom de parall´ elogrammes. M´ em. des Sav. ´Etr. Pr´ es. ` a l’Acad. St.-P´ etersb. 7 (1854), 539–568

  2. [10]

    C. K. Chui and L. Zhong. The Marcinkiewicz–Zygmund Inequality on a Smooth Simple Arc. J. Approx. Theory 83 (1995), 65–83

    1995

  3. [11]

    C. K. Chui and L. Zhong. On Marcinkiewicz–Zygmund Inequalities and Ap-Weights for L-Shape Arcs. J. Geom. Anal. 31 (2021), 9276–9294

    2021

  4. [12]

    J. S. Christiansen, B. Simon and M. Zinchenko. Asymptotics of Chebyshev polynomials, I: subsets ofR. Invent. Math. 208 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    J. S. Christiansen, B. Simon, M. Zinchenko. Widom factors and Szeg˝ o-Widom asymptotics, a review. Toeplitz operators and random matrices – in memory of Harold Widom, 301–319, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., 289, Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    J. S. Christiansen, B. Simon, P. Yuditskii, M. Zinchenko. Asymptotics of Chebyshev polynomials, II: DCT subsets ofR. Duke Math. J. 168 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    R. R. Coifman, P. Jones and S. Semmes. Two elementary proofs of the L2 boundedness of the Cauchy integral on Lipschitz curves. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1989), 553–564

    1989

  8. [16]

    R. R. Coifman, A. McIntosh, Y. Meyer. L’int´ egrale de Cauchy d´ efinit un op´ erateur born´ e surL 2 pour les courbes lipschitziennes. Ann. of Math. (2) 116 (1982), no. 2, 361–387

    1982

  9. [17]

    Courteaut, K

    K. Courteaut, K. Johansson and F. Viklund. Planar Coulomb gas on a Jordan arc at any temperature. arXiv:2504.19887 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    G. David. Op´ erateurs int´ egraux singuliers sur certaines courbes du plan complexe, Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4)17 (1984), 157–189

    1984

  11. [19]

    G. David. L’int´ egrale de Cauchy sur les courbes rectifiables. Universit´ e de Paris-Sud, D´ epartement de Math´ ematiques (Orsay), Pr´ epublication 82T05 (1982)

    1982

  12. [20]

    E. M. Dyn’kin. The rate of polynomial approximation in the complex domain. In: Complex analysis and Spectral theory. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 864 (1979/80). CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS ON A JORDAN ARC 43

    1979

  13. [21]

    E. M. Dyn’kin. Methods of the theory of singular integrals: Hilbert transform and Calder´ on- Zygmund theory. Commutative harmonic analysis, I, 167–259, Encyclopaedia Math. Sci., 15, Springer, Berlin, 1991

    1991

  14. [22]

    G. Faber. ¨Uber Tschebyscheffsche Polynome. J. Reine Angew. Math. 150 (1920), 79–106

    1920

  15. [23]

    Fekete and J

    M. Fekete and J. L. Walsh. On the asymptotic behavior of polynomials with extremal properties, and of their zeros. J. Anal. Math. 4 (1954), 49–87

    1954

  16. [24]

    J. B. Garnett. Bounded analytic functions. Revised first edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 236. Springer, New York, 2007. xiv+459 pp

    2007

  17. [25]

    A. Lerner. A simple proof of the A2 conjecture. Int. Math Res. Not. Vol. 2013, No. 14 (2013), pp. 3159–3170

    2013

  18. [26]

    Levin and D

    E. Levin and D. S. Lubinsky. Universality limits at the soft edge of the spectrum via classical complex analysis. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2011), no. 13, 3006–3070

    2011

  19. [27]

    E. Lorist. On Pointwise ℓr Sparse Domination in a Space of Homogeneous Type. J. Geom. Anal. 31 (2021), 9366–9405

    2021

  20. [28]

    Mattila, M

    P. Mattila, M. S. Melnikov and J. Verdera. The Cauchy integral, analytic capacity, and uniform rectifiability. Ann. of Math. (2) 144(1) (1996), 127–136

    1996

  21. [29]

    L. S. Maergoiz and N. N. Rybakova. Chebyshev polynomials with zeros on a circle and adjacent problems. St. Petersburg Math. J. (2014), no. 6, 965–979

    2014

  22. [30]

    Mi˜ na-D ´ ıaz, O

    E. Mi˜ na-D ´ ıaz, O. Rubin and A. Wennman. Norms of Chebyshev and Faber polynomials on curves with corners and cusps. Preprint, arXiv:2509.22588 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    T. Rivlin. Chebyshev Polynomials: From Approximation Theory to Algebra and Number Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1990

    1990

  24. [32]

    T. J. Rivlin and H. S. Shapiro. A unified approach to certain problems of approximation and minimization. J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 9 (1961), 670–699

    1961

  25. [33]

    O. Rubin. Chebyshev polynomials in the complex plane and on the real line. Preprint, arXiv:2411.14175 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    J. B. Garnett and D. E. Marshall. Harmonic Measure. New Mathematical Monographs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005

    2005

  27. [35]

    H. S. Shapiro and A. L. Shields. On some interpolation problems for analytic functions. Amer. J. Math. 83 (1961), 513–532

    1961

  28. [36]

    V. I. Smirnov and N. A. Lebedev Functions of a complex variable. The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1968

    1968

  29. [37]

    Sodin and P

    M. Sodin and P. Yuditskii. Functions that deviate least from zero on closed subsets of the real axis. St. Petersburg Math. J. 4 (1993), no. 2, 201–249

    1993

  30. [38]

    P. K. Suetin. Fundamental properties of Faber polynomials. Russian Math. Surveys 19 (1964), 121–149

    1964

  31. [39]

    Thiran and C

    J.-P. Thiran and C. Detaille, Chebyshev polynomials on circular arcs and in the complex plane,Progress in Approximation Theory, Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1991, pp. 771–786

    1991

  32. [40]

    Totik, Chebyshev polynomials on compact sets,Potential Anal.40(2014) 511–524

    V. Totik, Chebyshev polynomials on compact sets,Potential Anal.40(2014) 511–524

    2014

  33. [41]

    Totik, Asymptotics of Christoffel functions on arcs and curves,Adv

    V. Totik, Asymptotics of Christoffel functions on arcs and curves,Adv. Math.252(2014) 114–149

    2014

  34. [42]

    Totik and P

    V. Totik and P. Yuditskii. On a conjecture of Widom. J. Approx. Theory 190 (2015), 50–61

    2015

  35. [43]

    Totik and T

    V. Totik and T. Varga. Chebyshev and fast decreasing polynomials. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 110 (2015), no. 5, 1057–1098. 44 B. BUCHECKER, B. EICHINGER, O. RUBIN, AND A. WENNMAN

    2015

  36. [44]

    J. Verdera. Birth and life of the L2 boundedness of the Cauchy Integral on Lipschitz graphs. Yves Meyer – Selecta, Documents Math´ ematiques, Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France (2026)

    2026

  37. [45]

    V. S. Vidensky Uniform approximation in the complex plane. Usp. mat. Nauk. 11, 5, (71), 169–175 (1956)

    1956

  38. [46]

    H. Widom. Extremal polynomials associated with a system of curves in the complex plane. Adv. Math. 3 (1969), pp. 127–232

    1969

  39. [47]

    L. F. Zhong. Mean convergence of interpolation polynomials in a domain with corners. J. Approx. Theory 77 (1994), no. 2, 139–152. Benedikt Buchecker KU Leuven Leuven, Belgium benedikt.buchecker@kuleuven.be Benjamin Eichinger Lancaster University Lancaster, United Kingdom b.eic...

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.