Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Detection of Sulfur Dioxide by Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy (BBCEAS)

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A compact LED-based BBCEAS instrument detects ambient SO2 down to 0.75 ppbv in five minutes, matching a reference fluorescence monitor with slope 1.04.

desk verdict A solid, honest LED-BBCEAS demonstration for ambient SO2 with a strong external intercomparison; the central claim holds up, though the calibrator-vs-TECO attribution of the headline slope needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15601 v1 pith:CEANSHS4 submitted 2024-11-23 physics.ins-det physics.ao-ph

Ryan Thalman , Nitish Bhardwaj , Callum E. Flowerday , Jaron C. Hansen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-detphysics.ao-ph
keywords BBCEASsulfurdioxideUVabsorptionspectroscopydetectionlimitairqualitymonitoringopticalcavitytracegasinterference-freemeasurement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a compact absorption instrument—broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (BBCEAS) with a 310 nm light-emitting diode and a 0.966 m optical cavity—that measures sulfur dioxide in the deep-UV window 305.5–312 nm. The claimed performance is a 3-σ detection limit of 0.75 ppbv at 5-minute averaging, an effective path length of 610 m from mirrors of 99.85% reflectivity, and agreement with a standard fluorescence SO2 monitor at slope 1.04 and $R^{2}$ = 0.9998. Because it is a direct absorption measurement using published cross sections, the method avoids the interferences that UV fluorescence instruments suffer from NO, xylenes, and water; the authors demonstrate no response to injected NO, xylenes, and acetone. If these claims hold, a modest-power, LED-based instrument could provide routine, interference-free ambient SO2 monitoring without carrying gas standards into the field.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the high-finesse optical cavity formed by a pair of 99.85%-reflectivity mirrors spaced 0.966 m apart, which turns a 0.966 m base path into an effective absorption path of 610 m. The mirror reflectivity $R(\lambda)$ is not taken from the manufacturer but measured in place from the differential Rayleigh scattering of helium versus nitrogen (Equation 1); this single calibration, together with the zero-air reference spectrum $I_0(\lambda)$, converts measured intensity ratios into absolute extinction via Equation (2). The retrieved concentrations come from a DOAS-style nonlinear least-squares fit (Equation 3) in which a third-order polynomial absorbs all broadband structure, so the method is sensitive only to the sharp, structured SO2 absorption bands. The combination of long effective path and structured-spectrum fitting is what enables sub-ppbv detection with a low-cost LED and a compact 3D-printed cage.

What would settle it

Re-measure $R(\lambda)$ by the helium/nitrogen Rayleigh method immediately after the ambient campaign and re-fit archived spectra with the re-measured reflectivity; if the retrieved SO2 time series shifts by more than the quoted 5.4% combined uncertainty, or if the reported slope of 1.04 versus the fluorescence monitor changes materially, then the single-time-point mirror calibration was the load-bearing assumption. A second, independent check: inject a structured UV absorber in the same window that was not in the interference test (for example OClO generated in situ) and observe whether the SO2 retrieval changes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the highly structured SO2 absorption bands between 305.5 and 312 nm can be quantified by a LED-based BBCEAS instrument at levels relevant to ambient air quality, with a minimum 3-σ detection limit of 0.75 ppbv over a 5-min average and 0.48 ppbv over 10 min. The retrieval fits the measured cavity extinction as $\epsilon(\lambda)=\sigma_{\mathrm{SO_2}}(\lambda)[\mathrm{SO_2}] + \sigma_{\mathrm{NO_2}}(\lambda)[\mathrm{NO_2}] + \mathrm{polynomial}$, using literature cross sections convolved to the instrument slit function, so only the structured (differential) part of the spectrum contributes; broadband extinction from aerosol or molecules such as acetone is absorbed by the polynomial. The instrument tracked a dilution-calibrated standard and a commercial fluorescence analyser with a correlation slope of 1.04 ± 0.05, offset 0 ± 1 ppbv, and $R^{2}$ = 0.9998. The authors also show that the BBCEAS signal is unchanged when 4 ppmv NO, roughly 1 ppmv xylenes, or ~20 ppmv acetone are added, whereas the fluorescence monitor reports an apparent SO2 response to NO. The paper concludes that this configuration is a viable complementary technique for SO2 monitoring and a pathway to detecting other structured UV absorbers in the same window.

Load-bearing premise

The entire concentration scale rests on one in-place calibration of the mirror reflectivity $R(\lambda)$ measured from the He/N2 Rayleigh-scattering difference at setup; if the mirrors become contaminated, the alignment drifts, or the published Rayleigh cross sections are inaccurate, every retrieved SO2 concentration scales by the same factor and the reported 1.04 agreement with the fluorescence standard moves away from unity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ambient SO2 monitoring at 0.75 ppbv (5-min) and 0.48 ppbv (10-min) is within the range needed for routine air-quality observations.
  • Field calibration can be done with helium and nitrogen rather than traceable SO2 standards, simplifying deployment.
  • The demonstrated insensitivity to NO, xylenes, and acetone means the fluorescence interferences that require scrubbers and corrections do not affect this absorption measurement.
  • Because the noise follows photon-shot statistics out to at least 20 minutes of integration, longer averaging directly lowers the detection limit without a plateau.
  • The same optical arrangement, with higher-throughput gratings, is projected to detect other structured absorbers in the 306–312 nm window at 5-min limits of about 13.5 ppbv NO2, 10.9 ppbv HCHO, 0.09 ppbv OClO, and 0.05 ppbv BrO, as listed in Table 1.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the single mirror-reflectivity calibration drifted during the six months of LED operation, all retrieved concentrations would scale uniformly, so the reported slope of 1.04 versus the fluorescence monitor is only as stable as that one calibration.
  • Editorial inference: The interference test used one injection each of NO, xylenes, and acetone; other structured UV absorbers in the 305–312 nm window, such as OClO or BrO-like species, were not tested, so 'no interference' is established for the tested set only.
  • Editorial inference: A natural extension, mentioned by the authors only as future work, is an open-path configuration to detect short-lived species (BrO, OClO, OH); the same fitting machinery would apply with a different inlet and mirror spacing.
  • Editorial inference: The demonstrated cost advantages (3D-printed cage, ~40 W power, LED source) point toward deployment on unmanned aerial platforms for mapping large SO2 emitters, but flight vibration and temperature cycling would need to be tested.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports a broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectrometer (BBCEAS) for measuring sulfur dioxide in the deep UV (305.5–312 nm) using a 310 nm LED and high-reflectivity mirrors (R=0.9985). The instrument is calibrated by a He/N2 Rayleigh-scattering difference to retrieve the effective path length, and SO2 concentrations are retrieved by nonlinear least-squares DOAS fitting using literature absorption cross sections. The headline results are a 3-sigma limit of detection of 0.75 ppbv at 5 min averaging (2.6 ppbv at 30 s), an intercomparison slope of 1.04 ± 0.05 with R^2 = 0.9998, a 5.4% combined uncertainty estimate, and the absence of response to NO, xylenes, and acetone. The paper also presents ambient measurements and describes a 3D-printed cage construction.

Significance. If the claims are sustained, this is a useful demonstration of a compact, low-power, interference-free optical approach to ambient SO2 monitoring that approaches commercial fluorescence performance, and it extends BBCEAS into a spectral region (305–312 nm) where LEDs and mirror coatings have historically limited sensitivity. The use of inert-gas calibration and published absorption cross sections is attractive for field deployment and avoids the need for permeation sources. The paper reports a clear photon-noise scaling test (14 h of N2 data) and direct interference tests with NO, xylenes, and acetone. However, the accuracy claim rests on the traceability of the intercomparison and on the long-term stability of the single mirror-reflectivity calibration; these points need clarification before the results can be fully accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.1 and Figure 7] The text in Section 3.1 states that 'The correlation of the standard dilution from the calibrator with the BBCEAS retrieved concentrations yielded a slope of 1.04 ± 0.05, an offset of 0 ± 1 ppbv, and an R2 value of 0.9998 (Figure 7).' In contrast, the caption of Figure 7 says 'Correlation of BBCEAS (boxes) measured SO2 with respect to that measured by the TECO 43i-TLE.' These are different references: the dilution calibrator is a certified standard while the TECO 43i-TLE is a field fluorescence monitor with its own calibration. If the slope is against the TECO, the intercomparison is one step removed from a traceable standard and the 1.04 slope does not directly validate the BBCEAS accuracy. Please clarify which data are shown in Figure 7, state the traceability of the reference, and if possible provide the correlation against the certified calibrator explicitly.
  2. [Section 2, Eqs. (1)-(2)] All retrieved mixing ratios are linearly proportional to the factor (1-R(λ))/d0 in Eq. (2), where R(λ) is measured once by the He/N2 Rayleigh-scattering method of Eq. (1). With R ≈ 0.9985 at 310 nm, the mirror-loss term (1-R)/d0 is about 1.55×10−3 m−1, and a small absolute drift or bias in R produces a larger relative change in (1-R); for example, an absolute change of 0.0001 in R changes (1-R) by about 7%. The paper reports six months of LED output stability but gives no re-measurement of R over the campaign, and it does not state when the R calibration was performed relative to the calibration and ambient intercomparison. The stated '<2%' uncertainty for the mirror reflectivity is also ambiguous about whether it applies to R or to (1-R). Please provide a time record or repeated R measurements, and a sensitivity analysis showing how a plausible drift in R affects the 1.04 slope and the 5.4% combined uncertainty.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1] The sentence 'Most of the ambient data exhibited no measured SO2 as shown in the ambient portion of Figure 4' appears to reference the wrong figure; Figure 4 shows He/N2 spectra and reflectivity, not ambient time series. This likely should refer to Figure 6 or Figure S2.
  2. [Section 4] The sentence 'Other absorbance measurements (LP or MAX-DOAS) depend on long path lengths in the atmosphere to and do not represent a point measurement' is garbled and should be rephrased, e.g., 'LP-DOAS and MAX-DOAS depend on long atmospheric path lengths and do not represent point measurements.'
  3. [Section 3.3] The manuscript reports a 'minimum RMS photon shot noise of 8.7×10−5' and a 'minimum fit residual for the 30 s average is 1.6 × 10−8 cm−1'; these numbers differ by orders of magnitude and appear to describe different quantities. Please specify the units and definition of each noise metric (e.g., dimensionless intensity ratio versus extinction in cm−1).
  4. [Section 3.3] The uncertainty budget lists 'the measurement of the pressure (5%)' as a contributor, but the final 5.4% combined uncertainty appears to be derived only from the 2% extinction uncertainty and the 5% cross-section uncertainty. Please clarify whether the pressure uncertainty is included, and if so, how the mixing-ratio uncertainty remains 5.4%.
  5. [Section 2 and Abstract] The abstract and conclusions state that 'the BBCEAS showed no interference' and is 'free from interfering species,' while the experimental tests covered NO, xylenes, and acetone only; water vapor was not tested, and other structured UV absorbers such as BrO, OClO, and HCHO (shown in Figure 1) were not examined. Please qualify these statements to the tested species.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the mirror-reflectivity calibration, external cross-section fitting, noise-based LOD, and external intercomparison are independent of the claimed SO2 result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the non-circular sense. Mirror reflectivity R(lambda) is measured once via the He/N2 differential Rayleigh-scattering method (Eq. 1), which is an independent calibration input and is not derived from SO2 concentrations or from the intercomparison slope. Equation (2) is the standard BBCEAS extinction relation, and Equation (3) retrieves concentrations by fitting externally published SO2 and NO2 absorption cross sections (Rufus et al. 2003; Vandaele et al. 1998), so the retrieval does not reduce to a fitted parameter of this paper. The 0.75 ppbv LOD is computed from the standard deviation of baseline retrieved concentrations, a statistical noise measure, not from any calibration fit. The intercomparison against the dilution calibrator and/or the TECO 43i-TLE (slope 1.04, R^2 = 0.9998) is an external benchmark: the reported slope is compared against an independent standard, not used as an input to the retrieval. The paper's self-citations, notably Thalman et al. 2014 for Rayleigh scattering cross sections and Thalman and Volkamer 2010 for the BBCEAS method, are real external support because those cited quantities are experimentally measured and not outputs of the present analysis; the load-bearing calibration chain does not define the target result in terms of itself. The only notable issue is an internal-consistency gap in validation reporting, namely that Section 3.1 attributes the 1.04 slope to the dilution calibrator while the Figure 7 caption attributes it to the TECO 43i-TLE; this is a documentation/validation-clarity issue, not a circularity. No step in the paper's derivation is equivalent by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claims (0.75 ppbv LOD, slope 1.04) depend on: (a) the BBCEAS extinction equation and its Rayleigh-scattering term, (b) the accuracy of a single reflectivity calibration, (c) the published SO2 and NO2 cross sections (external), (d) the assumption that no other structured absorbers bias the fit, and (e) the white-noise model used to scale the LOD with averaging time. The instrument introduces no new physical entities; its novelty is engineering (UV LED, 3D-printed cage). The main data-driven free selection is the choice of the Rufus cross-section dataset, justified by improved fit residuals.

free parameters (3)
  • DOAS fit polynomial order = 3
    Eq. 3 retrieves SO2 and NO2 against a 3rd-degree polynomial; the order and the 305.5-312 nm window are chosen to absorb broadband extinction and stray light without being fitted to the SO2 standards.
  • Spectral fit window = 305.5-312 nm
    Chosen in Section 2; determines how much of the structured SO2 band and how much LED rolloff are included. A wider window would change the differential cross section sampled.
  • SO2 absorption cross-section dataset = Rufus et al. 2003 at 295 K, convolved to instrument slit function
    Selected over Bogumil et al. because it improved the fit residual by 20% at higher concentrations (Section 3.1); a residual-driven choice that can bias absolute retrieved mixing ratios, bounded by the 4% intercomparison offset.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption BBCEAS extinction equation: epsilon(lambda) = ((1-R)/d0 + epsilon_Rayleigh) * (I0 - I)/I (Eq. 2)
    Taken from Fiedler et al. 2003 and Washenfelder et al. 2008; assumes an incoherent, broadband cavity average and that R(lambda) is known from calibration. Invoked in Section 2 for all retrievals.
  • domain assumption Rayleigh scattering cross sections of N2, He, and air at 305-312 nm (Thalman et al. 2014)
    Used in Eq. 1 to measure mirror reflectivity and in Eq. 2 for the air-extinction term; the specific values come from a paper co-authored by the present first author, though that dataset is externally validated against earlier literature.
  • domain assumption Only SO2 and NO2 have structured absorption large enough to matter in the 305.5-312 nm fit window
    Stated in Section 2 ('Only SO2 and NO2 absorption was retrieved as the absorption cross sections of other gases are either too small or not in large-enough concentrations relative to the sensitivity of the instrument to be fitted'). Interference tests cover NO, xylenes, acetone, not every possible structured absorber.
  • standard math White-noise (photon-shot-noise) scaling of the retrieved SO2 baseline, RMS = 1/sqrt(N)
    Applied in Section 3.3 to convert the N2 baseline RMS into LOD values at 1, 5, and 10 min averages; assumes no 1/f noise plateau over the tested range, which the data in Figure 9 support.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detection of Sulfur Dioxide by Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy (BBCEAS)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CEANSHS4

@misc{pith2026241115601,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detection of Sulfur Dioxide by Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy (BBCEAS)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CEANSHS4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15601}
}
abstract

Sulfur dioxide ($\mathrm{SO}_2$) is an important precursor for the formation of atmospheric sulfate aerosol and acid rain. We present an instrument using Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy (BBCEAS) for the measurement of $\mathrm{SO}_2$ with a minimum limit of detection of 0.75 ppbv (3-$\sigma$) using the spectral range 305.5--312 nm and an averaging time of 5 min. The instrument consists of high-reflectivity mirrors (0.9985 at 310 nm) and a deep UV light source (Light Emitting Diode). The effective absorption path length of the instrument is 610 m with a 0.966 m base length. Published reference absorption cross sections were used to fit and retrieve the $\mathrm{SO}_2$ concentrations and were compared to fluorescence standard measurements for $\mathrm{SO}_2$. The comparison was well correlated ($R^2 = 0.9998$) with a correlation slope of 1.04. Interferences for fluorescence measurements were tested, and the BBCEAS showed no interference, while ambient measurements responded similarly to standard measurement techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15601 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Absorption cross sections of species absorbing in the 300–320 nm range including, SO2 [45], NO2 [42], BrO [43], OClO [41], acetone [44], and HCHO [46]. The spectral fitting window for the SO2 BBCEAS is shown in blue. 2. Materials and Methods The SO2 cavity instrument consists of an optical cavity mounted in a 3D-printed cage assembly sitting on top of an instrument control box [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic of BBCEAS cavity as set up for comparison with the SO2 standard and ambient sampling. Flow is pulled into the system, and the total flow of the sample and the overflow are measured by mass flow meters (MFM). BBCEAS measurements are made in parallel with the Thermo Electron Corporation (TECO) 43 series instruments. The optical cavity consists of a 0.75-inch outer diameter PFA Teflon tube placed between the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mechanical drawing of the cage-mounting system for the BBCEAS. Cage plates are con￾structed of 3D-printed plastic parts with pultruded carbon tubes forming the optical cage. The concentrations of the trace gases of interest were retrieved by nonlinear least square fitting in IGOR (Wavemetrics) by minimizing the error of the following equation with a 3rd-degree polynomial enabling a Differential Optical Absorption Sp… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Panel (A): signal intensity in the presence of He and N2 gas as used in Equation (1). Panel (B): effective pathlength (1/e) in meters. Panel (C): measured mirror reflectivity in the useable wavelength range. Comparison of SO2 Measurements Initial testing of the BBCEAS …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fits of Equation (3) (black) relative to the measured extinction (red) in the lower portion of each panel. The difference of the black and red is shown on the upper axis for each panel in blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time series of retrieved SO2 concentrations. Panel (A) shows the 1-σ standard deviation of the fit residual for the 30 s, 5 min, and 10 min data. Panel (B) shows the measured SO2 from the three instruments under ambient, SO2 + ambient, and calibration conditions as wel…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Correlation of BBCEAS (boxes) measured SO2 with respect to that measured by the TECO 43i-TLE. The linear fit equation and uncertainties are included in the graph. 3.3. Signal-Averaging Effect on Precision and Accuracy Signal-to-noise evaluation was carried out on spect…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Panel (A)—fit residual RMS for interference of xylenes and acetone; panel (B)—fitted polynomial at 308 nm for xylene and acetone interference, showing fitted acetone absorption that is accomodated in the fit by the polynomial; panel (C)—retrieved concentrations of SO2 …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Signal-to-noise evaluation for the spectrometer evaluated as the 1-σ RMS noise. The RMS noise levels off at longer integration times. 3.4. Performance of 3D-Printed Cage System The 3D-printed cage system held up well under the movement of the instrument between locatio…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Both Sides Now

    Schwartz, S.E. Both Sides Now. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1987, 502, 83–144. [CrossRef]

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    Satellite observations and interpretation of the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption plumes

    Holasek, R.E.; Self, S.; Woods, A.W. Satellite observations and interpretation of the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption plumes. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1996, 101, 27635–27655. [CrossRef]

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    Oxidation of CS 2 and COS: Sources for atmospheric SO 2

    Logan, J.A.; McElroy, M.B.; Wofsy, S.C.; Prather, M.J. Oxidation of CS 2 and COS: Sources for atmospheric SO 2. Nature 1979, 281, 185–188. [CrossRef]

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    Anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions: 1850–2005

    Smith, S.J.; van Aardenne, J.; Klimont, Z.; Andres, R.J.; Volke, A.; Delgado Arias, S. Anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions: 1850–2005. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 1101–1116. [CrossRef]

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    The changing face of lower tropospheric sulfur oxides in the United States

    Hidy, G.M.; Blanchard, C. The changing face of lower tropospheric sulfur oxides in the United States. Elem. Sci. Anthr. 2016, 4, 000138. [CrossRef]

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides-Health Criteria ; Technical Report EPA-HQ-ORD-2013-0357; U.S

    EPA. Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides-Health Criteria ; Technical Report EPA-HQ-ORD-2013-0357; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2017

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Stratospheric Loading of Sulfur From Explosive Volcanic Eruptions

    Bluth, G.J.S.; Rose, W.I.; Sprod, I.E.; Krueger, A.J. Stratospheric Loading of Sulfur From Explosive Volcanic Eruptions. J. Geol. 1997, 105, 671–684. [CrossRef]

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    An Overview of Geo- engineering of Climate Using Stratospheric Sulphate Aerosols

    Rasch, P .J.; Tilmes, S.; Turco, R.P .; Robock, A.; Oman, L.; Chen, C.C.J.; Stenchikov, G.L.; Garcia, R.R. An Overview of Geo- engineering of Climate Using Stratospheric Sulphate Aerosols. Philos. T rans. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2008, 366, 4007–4037. [CrossRef]

    work page 2008

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Sulfate geoengineering: A review of the factors controlling the needed injection of sulfur dioxide

    Visioni, D.; Pitari, G.; Aquila, V . Sulfate geoengineering: A review of the factors controlling the needed injection of sulfur dioxide. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 3879–3889. [CrossRef]

    2017

  2. [10]

    Methods for gas-phase measurements of ozone, ozone precursors and aerosol precursors

    Parrish, D.D.; Fehsenfeld, F.C. Methods for gas-phase measurements of ozone, ozone precursors and aerosol precursors. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 1921–1957. [CrossRef]

    2000

  3. [11]

    Results of the Gas-Phase Sulfur Intercomparison Experiment (GASIE): Overview of experimental setup, results and general conclusions

    Stecher, H.A., III; Luther, G.W., III; MacTaggart, D.L.; Farwell, S.O.; Crosley, D.R.; Dorko, W.D.; Goldan, P .D.; Beltz, N.; Krischke, U.; Luke, W.T.; et al. Results of the Gas-Phase Sulfur Intercomparison Experiment (GASIE): Overview of experimental setup, results and genera...

    1997

  4. [12]

    Fixation of Sulfur Dioxide as Disulfitomercurate (II) and Subsequent Colorimetric Estimation

    West, P .W.; Gaeke, G.C. Fixation of Sulfur Dioxide as Disulfitomercurate (II) and Subsequent Colorimetric Estimation. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 1816–1819. [CrossRef]

    1956

  5. [13]

    Reference and Equivalent Methods Used to Measure National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Criteria Air Pollutants; Technical Report EPA/600/R-16/139; U.S

    Gilliam, J.; Hall, E. Reference and Equivalent Methods Used to Measure National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Criteria Air Pollutants; Technical Report EPA/600/R-16/139; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; Volume I

    2016

  6. [14]

    ppb-Level SO 2 Photoacoustic Sensors with a Suppressed Absorption–Desorption Effect by Using a 7.41 µm External-Cavity Quantum Cascade Laser

    Yin, X.; Wu, H.; Dong, L.; Li, B.; Ma, W.; Zhang, L.; Yin, W.; Xiao, L.; Jia, S.; Tittel, F.K. ppb-Level SO 2 Photoacoustic Sensors with a Suppressed Absorption–Desorption Effect by Using a 7.41 µm External-Cavity Quantum Cascade Laser. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 549–556. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

    2020

  7. [15]

    Detection of Sulfur Dioxide by Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy

    Medina, D.S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J. Detection of Sulfur Dioxide by Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. T echnol. 2011, 45, 1926–1931. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

    2011

  8. [16]

    Improving long-path differential optical absorption spectroscopy with a quartz-fiber mode mixer

    Stutz, J.; Platt, U. Improving long-path differential optical absorption spectroscopy with a quartz-fiber mode mixer. Appl. Opt. 1997, 36, 1105–1115. [CrossRef]

    1997

  9. [17]

    Application of a long-path differential optical absorption spectrometer (LP-DOAS) on the measurements of NO2, SO2, O3, and HNO2 in Gwangju, Korea

    Lee, J.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, J. Application of a long-path differential optical absorption spectrometer (LP-DOAS) on the measurements of NO2, SO2, O3, and HNO2 in Gwangju, Korea. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 86, 750–759. [CrossRef]

    2008

  10. [18]

    Sulfur dioxide measurements in the lower, middle and upper troposphere: Deployment of an aircraft-based chemical ionization mass spectrometer with permanent in-flight calibration

    Speidel, M.; Nau, R.; Arnold, F.; Schlager, H.; Stohl, A. Sulfur dioxide measurements in the lower, middle and upper troposphere: Deployment of an aircraft-based chemical ionization mass spectrometer with permanent in-flight calibration. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 2427–2437. [CrossRef]

    2007

  11. [19]

    Surveillance of SO2 and NO2 from ship emissions by MAX-DOAS measurements and the implications regarding fuel sulfur content compliance

    Cheng, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhu, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Q.; Ma, W.; Zhou, B. Surveillance of SO2 and NO2 from ship emissions by MAX-DOAS measurements and the implications regarding fuel sulfur content compliance. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 13611–13626. [CrossRef]

    2019

  12. [20]

    Broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy using light emitting diodes

    Ball, S.M.; Langridge, J.M.; Jones, R.L. Broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy using light emitting diodes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 398, 68–74. [CrossRef]

    2004

  13. [21]

    A compact broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer for detection of atmospheric NO2 using light emitting diodes

    Langridge, J.M.; Ball, S.M.; Jones, R.L. A compact broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer for detection of atmospheric NO2 using light emitting diodes. Analyst 2006, 131, 916–922. [CrossRef]

    2006

  14. [22]

    Measurement of glyoxal using an incoherent broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer

    Washenfelder, R.A.; Langford, A.O.; Fuchs, H.; Brown, S.S. Measurement of glyoxal using an incoherent broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2008, 8, 7779–7793. [CrossRef]

    2008

  15. [23]

    Inherent calibration of a blue LED-CE-DOAS instrument to measure iodine oxide, glyoxal, methyl glyoxal, nitrogen dioxide, water vapour and aerosol extinction in open cavity mode

    Thalman, R.; Volkamer, R. Inherent calibration of a blue LED-CE-DOAS instrument to measure iodine oxide, glyoxal, methyl glyoxal, nitrogen dioxide, water vapour and aerosol extinction in open cavity mode. Atmos. Meas. T ech. 2010, 3, 1797–1814. [CrossRef]

    2010

  16. [24]

    High Sensitivity in Situ Monitoring of NO3 in an Atmospheric Simulation Chamber Using Incoherent Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy

    Venables, D.S.; Gherman, T.; Orphal, J.; Wenger, J.C.; Ruth, A.A. High Sensitivity in Situ Monitoring of NO3 in an Atmospheric Simulation Chamber Using Incoherent Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. T echnol. 2006, 40, 6758–6763. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

    2006

  17. [25]

    Absolute ozone absorption cross section in the Huggins Chappuis minimum (350–470 nm) at 296 K

    Axson, J.L.; Washenfelder, R.A.; Kahan, T.F.; Young, C.J.; Vaida, V .; Brown, S.S. Absolute ozone absorption cross section in the Huggins Chappuis minimum (350–470 nm) at 296 K. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 11581–11590. [CrossRef] Sensors 2022, 22, 2626 14 of 15

    2011

  18. [26]

    Instrument intercomparison of glyoxal, methyl glyoxal and NO 2 under simulated atmospheric conditions

    Thalman, R.; Baeza-Romero, M.T.; Ball, S.M.; Borrás, E.; Daniels, M.J.S.; Goodall, I.C.A.; Henry, S.B.; Karl, T.; Keutsch, F.N.; Kim, S.; et al. Instrument intercomparison of glyoxal, methyl glyoxal and NO 2 under simulated atmospheric conditions. Atmos. Meas. T ech.2015, 8, 1...

    2015

  19. [27]

    The time dependence of molecular iodine emission from Laminaria digitata

    Dixneuf, S.; Ruth, A.A.; Vaughan, S.; Varma, R.M.; Orphal, J. The time dependence of molecular iodine emission from Laminaria digitata. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 823–829. [CrossRef]

    2009

  20. [28]

    Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy of the marine boundary layer species I2, IO and OIO

    Vaughan, S.; Gherman, T.; Ruth, A.A.; Orphal, J. Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy of the marine boundary layer species I2, IO and OIO. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 4471–4477. [CrossRef]

    2008

  21. [29]

    Near-ultraviolet Incoherent Broadband Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy for OClO and CH2O in Cl-initiated Photooxidation Experiment

    Dong, M.; Zhao, W.; Huang, M.; Chen, W.; Hu, C.; Gu, X.; Pei, S.; Huang, W.; Zhang, W. Near-ultraviolet Incoherent Broadband Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy for OClO and CH2O in Cl-initiated Photooxidation Experiment. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 26, 133–139. [CrossRef]

    2013

  22. [30]

    The UV and visible spectra of chlorine peroxide: Constraining the atmospheric photolysis rate

    Young, I.A.K.; Jones, R.L.; Pope, F.D. The UV and visible spectra of chlorine peroxide: Constraining the atmospheric photolysis rate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 1781–1788. [CrossRef]

    2014

  23. [31]

    An instrument for measurements of BrO with LED-based Cavity-Enhanced Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy

    Hoch, D.J.; Buxmann, J.; Sihler, H.; Pöhler, D.; Zetzsch, C.; Platt, U. An instrument for measurements of BrO with LED-based Cavity-Enhanced Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy. Atmos. Meas. T ech. 2014, 7, 199–214. [CrossRef]

    2014

  24. [32]

    Incoherent Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy in the near-Ultraviolet: Application to HONO and NO2

    Gherman, T.; Venables, D.S.; Vaughan, S.; Orphal, J.; Ruth, A.A. Incoherent Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy in the near-Ultraviolet: Application to HONO and NO2. Environ. Sci. T echnol. 2008, 42, 890–895. [CrossRef]

    2008

  25. [33]

    Broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy in the ultraviolet spectral region for measurements of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde

    Washenfelder, R.A.; Attwood, A.R.; Flores, J.M.; Zarzana, K.J.; Rudich, Y.; Brown, S.S. Broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy in the ultraviolet spectral region for measurements of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde. Atmos. Meas. T ech. 2016, 9, 41–52. [CrossRef]

    2016

  26. [34]

    Wang, M.; Varma, R.; Venables, D.S.; Zhou, W.; Chen, J. A Demonstration of Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy at Deep-Ultraviolet Wavelengths: Application to Sensitive Real-Time Detection of the Aromatic Pollutants Benzene, Toluene, and Xylene. Anal. Chem. 2022,...

    2022

  27. [35]

    Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections of O2–O2 collision pairs between 340 and 630 nm and at atmospherically relevant pressure

    Thalman, R.; Volkamer, R. Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections of O2–O2 collision pairs between 340 and 630 nm and at atmospherically relevant pressure. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 15371–15381. [CrossRef]

    2013

  28. [36]

    Absorption Spectroscopy in High-Finesse Cavities for Atmospheric Studies

    Brown, S.S. Absorption Spectroscopy in High-Finesse Cavities for Atmospheric Studies. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 5219–5238. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

    2003

  29. [37]

    CW Integrated cavity output spectroscopy

    O’Keefe, A.; Scherer, J.J.; Paul, J.B. CW Integrated cavity output spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 307, 343–349. [CrossRef]

    1999

  30. [38]

    Detection of Nitrogen Dioxide by Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift Spectroscopy.Anal

    Kebabian, P .L.; Herndon, S.C.; Freedman, A. Detection of Nitrogen Dioxide by Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift Spectroscopy.Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 724–728. [CrossRef]

    2005

  31. [39]

    Optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spec- troscopy with an interband cascade laser: Application to SO2 trace analysis

    Richard, L.; Ventrillard, I.; Chau, G.; Jaulin, K.; Kerstel, E.; Romanini, D. Optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spec- troscopy with an interband cascade laser: Application to SO2 trace analysis. Appl. Phys. B 2016, 122, 247. [CrossRef]

    2016

  32. [40]

    A broadband optical cavity spectrometer for measuring weak near-ultraviolet absorption spectra of gases

    Chen, J.; Venables, D.S. A broadband optical cavity spectrometer for measuring weak near-ultraviolet absorption spectra of gases. Atmos. Meas. T ech. 2011, 4, 425–436. [CrossRef]

    2011

  33. [41]

    Bogumil, K.; Orphal, J.; Homann, T.; Voigt, S.; Spietz, P .; Fleischmann, O.; Vogel, A.; Hartmann, M.; Kromminga, H.; Bovensmann, H.; et al. Measurements of molecular absorption spectra with the SCIAMACHY pre-flight model: Instrument characterization and reference data for atmo...

    2003

  34. [42]

    Measurements of the NO2 absorption cross-section from 42,000 cm−1 to 10,000 cm−1 (238–1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K

    Vandaele, A.; Hermans, C.; Simon, P .; Carleer, M.; Colin, R.; Fally, S.; Mérienne, M.; Jenouvrier, A.; Coquart, B. Measurements of the NO2 absorption cross-section from 42,000 cm−1 to 10,000 cm−1 (238–1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. T ransf.1998, 59,...

    1998

  35. [43]

    Fourier Transform Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of the A 2Π3/2 ← X 2Π3/2 Transition of BrO

    Wilmouth, D.M.; Hanisco, T.F.; Donahue, N.M.; Anderson, J.G. Fourier Transform Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of the A 2Π3/2 ← X 2Π3/2 Transition of BrO. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 8935–8945. [CrossRef]

    1999

  36. [44]

    Photochemistry of acetone under tropospheric conditions

    Gierczak, T.; Burkholder, J.B.; Bauerle, S.; Ravishankara, A. Photochemistry of acetone under tropospheric conditions. Chem. Phys. 1998, 231, 229–244. [CrossRef]

    1998

  37. [45]

    High-resolution photoabsorption cross section measurements of SO2, 2: 220 to 325 nm at 295 K

    Rufus, J.; Stark, G.; Smith, P .L.; Pickering, J.C.; Thorne, A.P . High-resolution photoabsorption cross section measurements of SO2, 2: 220 to 325 nm at 295 K. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 2003, 108. [CrossRef]

    2003

  38. [46]

    Temperature dependence of the absorption cross sections of formaldehyde between 223 and 323 K in the wavelength range 225–375 nm

    Meller, R.; Moortgat, G.K. Temperature dependence of the absorption cross sections of formaldehyde between 223 and 323 K in the wavelength range 225–375 nm. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2000, 105, 7089–7101. [CrossRef]

    2000

  39. [47]

    Barbero, A.; Blouzon, C.; Savarino, J.; Caillon, N.; Dommergue, A.; Grilli, R. A compact incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectrometer for trace detection of nitrogen oxides, iodine oxide and glyoxal at levels below parts per billion for field applications. Atmos...

    2020

  40. [48]

    Rayleigh scattering cross-section measurements of nitrogen, argon, oxygen and air

    Thalman, R.; Zarzana, K.J.; Tolbert, M.A.; Volkamer, R. Rayleigh scattering cross-section measurements of nitrogen, argon, oxygen and air. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. T ransf. 2014, 147, 171–177. [CrossRef]

    2014

  41. [49]

    Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy

    Fiedler, S.E.; Hese, A.; Ruth, A.A. Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 371, 284–294. [CrossRef]

    2003

  42. [50]

    Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS)—Principles and Applications ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 15

    Platt, U.; Stutz, J. Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS)—Principles and Applications ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 15. [CrossRef]

    2008

  43. [51]

    QDOAS Software User Manual, Version 3.2

    Dankaert, T.; Fayt, C.; Roozendael, M.V .; Smedt, I.D.; Letocart, V .; Merlaud, A.; Pinardi, G. QDOAS Software User Manual, Version 3.2. 2017. Available online: http://uv-vis.aeronomie.be/software/QDOAS (accessed on 31 January 2021). Sensors 2022, 22, 2626 15 of 15

    2017

  44. [52]

    Kinetics and product studies of the reaction chlorine monoxide + bromine monoxide using flash photolysis-ultraviolet absorption

    Sander, S.P .; Friedl, R.R. Kinetics and product studies of the reaction chlorine monoxide + bromine monoxide using flash photolysis-ultraviolet absorption. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 4764–4771. [CrossRef]

    1989

  45. [53]

    Measurements of diurnal variations and eddy covariance (EC) fluxes of glyoxal in the tropical marine boundary layer: Description of the Fast LED-CE-DOAS instrument

    Coburn, S.; Ortega, I.; Thalman, R.; Blomquist, B.; Fairall, C.W.; Volkamer, R. Measurements of diurnal variations and eddy covariance (EC) fluxes of glyoxal in the tropical marine boundary layer: Description of the Fast LED-CE-DOAS instrument. Atmos. Meas. T ech. 2014, 7, 3579...

    2014

  46. [54]

    Open path incoherent broadband cavity- enhanced measurements of NO3 radical and aerosol extinction in the North China Plain

    Suhail, K.; George, M.; Chandran, S.; Varma, R.; Venables, D.; Wang, M.; Chen, J. Open path incoherent broadband cavity- enhanced measurements of NO3 radical and aerosol extinction in the North China Plain. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 208, 24–31. [CrossRef]

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.