Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 175 references

The spectral energy distribution of extreme population A quasars

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper provides the first SED template for extreme population A quasars—highly accreting sources selected by $\mathrm{R_{FeII}} \ge 1$—with a big blue bump, strong optical/UV emission, and a steep X-ray continuum that separate them…

desk verdict A useful, honestly-flagged first SED template for extreme Population A quasars, but the headline steep X-ray slope and the FUV peak both rest on model choices that the paper discloses without fully quantifying. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22912 v1 pith:CEEUK4D5 submitted 2025-05-28 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords quasarsactivegalacticnucleispectralenergydistributionextremepopulationAEddingtonratiobigbluebumpphotoionizationmodelingFeIIemission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors build the first broad-band spectral energy distribution (SED) template specifically for extreme population A (xA) quasars, which are highly accreting, possibly super-Eddington sources selected by the optical iron-to-H-$\beta$ ratio $\mathrm{R_{FeII}} \ge 1$. Combining radio-to-X-ray photometry of 155 low-redshift quasars with accretion-disk models that fill the unobservable far-UV gap, they construct a median radio-quiet SED. The resulting template shows a pronounced big blue bump, strong optical/UV emission, and a steep X-ray continuum, differing from SEDs of lower-accreting AGN and consistent with previously published high-Eddington-ratio SEDs. If correct, this is the first ionizing-continuum template specific to xA quasars, made available for CLOUDY photoionization calculations of broad-line region conditions and metallicities.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the median SED itself, assembled from the $\mathrm{R_{FeII}}$ parameter—the flux ratio of optical FeII (4434–4684 Å) to H$\beta$ 4861 Å—used to isolate the xA population ($\mathrm{R_{FeII}} \ge 1$), a criterion identifying highly accreting, possibly super-Eddington sources. Each source's radio-to-NUV photometry is normalized at 5100 Å, combined with a 13-source population A composite spectrum in the optical-NUV, and bridged across the unobservable far-UV by Kubota & Done (2018, 2019) accretion disk models that tie a warm Comptonizing region to a Novikov–Thorne emissivity profile, with black hole mass and Eddington-scaled accretion rate matched to the sample medians. The X-ray continuum is assembled from catalogs with published photon indices (soft ROSAT, 2–10 keV Swift, and >10 keV NuSTAR/INTEGRAL/BAT), yielding the steep slopes that define the template.

What would settle it

Obtain far-UV spectra across the Lyman limit for a sample of the low-redshift radio-quiet xA quasars with the lowest Galactic extinction; if the measured continuum from about 1200 Å down to 912 Å and the location of the peak deviate systematically from the Kubota–Done model curve that fills the unobservable gap in the template, the template's ionizing shape is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the SED of extreme population A quasars, selected by $\mathrm{R_{FeII}} \ge 1$, is systematically different from the SED of moderately accreting active galactic nuclei: it has a pronounced big blue bump, strong optical/UV emission, and a steep X-ray continuum with photon indices $\Gamma \sim 2.3$–$2.9$, and it lacks the Compton reflection hump of the classical Mathews–Ferland SED. The paper derives a median radio-quiet xA SED from 139 sources, normalizes it to the 5100 Å flux, fills the unobservable far-UV with Kubota–Done sub- and super-Eddington accretion disk models, and supplies the result as digital, CLOUDY-ready templates. The X-ray-to-UV shape is consistent with the high-accretion SEDs of Ferland et al. (2020), and radio-intermediate sources plus some radio-quiet sources show a far-IR excess plausibly tied to star formation, appearing to track the strength of FeII emission.

Load-bearing premise

The far-ultraviolet shape of the template—where the ionizing spectrum peaks and nothing observes directly—is taken from accretion-disk models that ignore the powerful winds these super-Eddington quasars are expected to drive, so any error in that assumed shape would flow into every line-intensity prediction the template is made to support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Photoionization models of the broad-line region in xA quasars will use a continuum with a stronger FUV/optical bump and a steeper X-ray tail than the classical Mathews–Ferland SED, changing derived metallicities, ionization parameters, and densities.
  • The template provides a benchmark for interpreting higher-redshift quasars with modest black hole masses (e.g., JWST-discovered sources with $M_{\mathrm{BH}} \sim 10^7$–$10^8\,M_\odot$) by offering predictions for line diagnostics such as CIV/H$\beta$ and HeII-based ratios.
  • The reported far-IR and radio excess in radio-intermediate and some radio-quiet xA sources connects strong FeII emission to host-galaxy star formation, offering a testable link between accretion rate and stellar growth.
  • The observed steep X-ray slopes ($\Gamma > 2$) and the absence of a prominent Compton hump support accretion geometries with a weak or differently located X-ray corona in super-Eddington sources.
  • The luminosity-scaled quartile SEDs imply bolometric corrections from 5100 Å of roughly 11–16, higher than typical AGN values, which affects black hole mass and Eddington ratio estimates for this population.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the far-UV shape is the template's most uncertain input, its correctness can be checked indirectly: CLOUDY predictions made with the supplied SED should reproduce the observed CIV/H$\beta$, HeII/H$\beta$, and $\mathrm{R_{FeII}}$ values across the xA population simultaneously, and a parameter-space gap would signal a wrong ionizing shape.
  • The paper's tentative Hubble diagram hints that outflow-corrected xA quasars could be developed into standardizable distance indicators, potentially extending virial-luminosity cosmological tests to $z \sim 1$.
  • A testable prediction follows from the FeII–FIR link: xA quasars with $\mathrm{R_{FeII}} \ge 1.5$ should show systematically higher star formation rates in deep far-IR and sub-mm observations than borderline xA sources matched in luminosity and redshift.
  • The template deliberately leaves a gap from submillimeter to far-IR; filling that gap with ALMA or Herschel photometry would directly test whether the radio emission connects to the IR excess via star formation, as the paper suggests.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a median semi-empirical spectral energy distribution (SED) for extreme Population A (xA) quasars, defined by the optical FeII/Hbeta ratio RFeII >= 1, using 155 sources up to z~1. The radio-to-NUV part is built from NED photometry with linear regression and spline interpolation, the unobservable far-UV is filled with Kubota & Done (2018, 2019) accretion disk models, and the X-ray domain is assembled from ROSAT, Swift, NuSTAR, and Integral measurements. The resulting median radio-quiet SED shows a pronounced big blue bump, strong optical/UV emission, and a steep X-ray continuum (Gamma_soft ~ 2.87). The paper also reports radio-intermediate and some radio-quiet sources having a significant far-IR excess that correlates with FeII prominence, and it provides the SEDs as digital templates for CLOUDY photoionization modeling. The xA SED is found to be broadly consistent with the high-Eddington-ratio SEDs of Ferland et al. (2020).

Significance. If the construction is sound, this is the first SED template specific to the optically selected xA population, and it would be a valuable input for photoionization modeling of the broad-line region in high-accretion, possibly super-Eddington quasars and in high-redshift analogs. The paper's strengths are the clear sample definition, the data-driven construction over radio to NUV, the explicit treatment of radio-loudness classes, and the public release of machine-readable SED files, including a CLOUDY-ready version. The main risks to the headline claims are the post-hoc filtering of soft X-ray slopes and the model-dependent interpolation of the unobserved far-UV, both of which are acknowledged in the text but not quantitatively bracketed. These issues do not invalidate the SED construction approach, but they need to be addressed before the template is adopted for the precision photoionization applications the paper advertises.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2.3.1] The soft X-ray photon-index filter is not defined quantitatively: the statement 'we removed the outlying steepest and most positive slopes' gives no threshold (percentile, sigma, or residual criterion), and the two kinds of removed outliers push the median photon index in opposite directions. Since the median Gamma_soft ~ 2.87 (Section 3.2.3) is a headline result supporting the abstract's claim of a steep X-ray continuum, the paper must report the photon-index distribution before and after filtering and demonstrate that the adopted median is robust to reasonable filter choices.
  2. [Section 3.2.2] The FUV gap is filled by Kubota & Done (2018, 2019) disk models with parameters adjusted to the observed optical/UV, but the claim that 'the implications on the ionizing continuum are minor' rests only on comparing these two models, which share the same wind-free assumption. The paper itself notes that powerful winds, neglected in both models, affect super-Eddington quasars; because the deliverable is a CLOUDY-ready ionizing continuum, a systematic EUV shape error propagates into the predicted RFeII, CIV/Hbeta, and HeII ratios in Section 5.4. A sensitivity test with alternative FUV shapes (e.g., power-law or wind-modified disk spectra) is needed to support the claimed robustness.
  3. [Table 2] Table 2 is not readable: the column layout is corrupted, with entries such as '0.0' and '1.0' scattered among the cells and the header 'f5100 normalized luminosity scaled' not matching the data columns. Since this table reports the Kubota & Done disk model parameters that define the FUV input for the normalized and luminosity-scaled SEDs, it must be retypeset for the paper to be reproducible.
  4. [Section 3.2.3] The assignment of Gamma = 2.5 for the 80-100 keV segment is an extrapolation not directly supported by the data in Table 1, which show medians around 2.1-2.3 with large scatter (e.g., 2.12 for the 3-80 keV group and 2.50 for the 2-100 keV group, the latter based on only three sources). The paper should either justify this value with a quantitative argument or explicitly flag the segment as an assumption in the digital SED file, including an uncertainty range.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.2.3] Typo: 'reanalyis' should be 'reanalysis'.
  2. [Section 2.2.3.3] The phrase 'we performed a search for NuStar data' should specify the search criteria (e.g., HEASARC query parameters, energy ranges, and the number of sources with available data) so that the result is reproducible.
  3. [Table 3] The column header 'flux in Jy Hz' is unclear; specify whether this is lambda f_lambda at 5100 Å in erg s^-1 cm^-2 or another unit.
  4. [Figure 7 caption] The caption reads 'only %5 of the sample (8 sources)' and 'only %5 of the sample' for the RI and RL subsamples; these should be '~5%'.
  5. [Section 5.1.1] The sentence 'the shape is shallower and decreasing (Gamma > 2)' is ambiguous; consider rephrasing as 'the spectrum is steeper (Gamma > 2) and decreasing with frequency'.
  6. [Section 5.6] The tentative Hubble diagram appears peripheral to the SED construction, and the authors already note the heterogeneous FWHM data; consider moving this subsection to an appendix or shortening it to avoid distracting from the main results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the xA SED is assembled from observed continuum photometry and an external accretion-disk model, and the CLOUDY line-ratio predictions are forward calculations rather than re-statements of the SED inputs.

full rationale

The paper's construction chain is: select xA sources by the optical RFeII criterion from literature catalogs; gather radio-to-X-ray photometry from NED and archival X-ray catalogs; normalize at 5100 Å and take medians; fill the unobservable far-UV gap with Kubota & Done (2018, 2019) accretion-disk models whose MBH and mdot are set to match the observed optical/UV continuum and the sample's independently estimated Eddington ratios (Section 3.2.2, Table 2); compare with Ferland et al. (2020) SEDs; and finally run CLOUDY 23.01 with the median SED to predict RFeII, Civ EW, and Civ/Hbeta as functions of U, nH, and Z (Section 5.4). None of these steps defines the result in terms of the inputs by construction. In particular, the SED is built from continuum photometry, not from the RFeII line ratios used to select the sample, so the later CLOUDY reproduction of observed RFeII is a consistency check, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The FUV disk model is tuned to continuum shape and to Eddington-ratio estimates, not to the line ratios predicted later; therefore the photoionization predictions retain independent content. The comparison with Ferland et al. (2020) is external, and those authors do not overlap with the present paper's author list as given. Self-citations such as the Marziani et al. (2013a) optical composite supply input data or context, but the central derivation does not reduce to a self-citation. The skeptical concern that the wind-free Kubota & Done models may misrepresent the EUV ionizing continuum is a genuine model-uncertainty/correctness risk, and the paper itself notes that winds are neglected, but this is an assumption-to-output propagation, not a circular equivalence. Appendix B's warning that the q1 SED should not be used in photoionization computations further shows the authors flag model sensitivity rather than disguising a fit as a result. No specific equation or fitted parameter can be exhibited that makes a claimed prediction equal to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core SED is built from archival photometry, so its free parameters are limited. The main fitted inputs are the disk model parameters used to fill the unobservable FUV, plus an assigned high energy photon index. The sample definition rests on the RFeII-to-accretion rate relation from prior work.

free parameters (5)
  • Kubota-Done disk model M_BH (5100A-normalized SED) = q2=6.31e7, q1=1e8, q3=1e7 M_sun
    Chosen to fit the observed optical-UV SED; Table 2.
  • Kubota-Done disk model log mdot (5100A-normalized SED) = q2=0.0, q1=-0.5, q3=0.0
    Chosen to match observed SED and Eddington ratios; Table 2.
  • Kubota-Done disk model M_BH (luminosity-scaled SED) = q1=1e8, q2=6.31e7, q3=6.31e8 M_sun
    Chosen to fit the luminosity-scaled SED; Table 2.
  • Kubota-Done disk model log mdot (luminosity-scaled SED) = q1=-0.5, q2=0.0, q3=0.0
    Chosen to match luminosity-scaled SED; Table 2.
  • Photon index assigned for 80-100 keV = 2.5
    Assigned because of sparse hard X-ray data; Section 3.2.3.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption RFeII >= 1 selects highly accreting, possibly super-Eddington quasars.
    Used as the sample-defining criterion, based on prior work (Marziani & Sulentic 2014; Du et al. 2016a; Panda et al. 2019b).
  • domain assumption Kubota & Done (2018, 2019) disk models accurately describe the unobservable FUV continuum of these quasars.
    The FUV is unobservable, so the SED peak and ionizing continuum are taken from these models; the authors note the models neglect powerful winds.
  • domain assumption Heterogeneous archival photometry can be combined into a coherent SED after standard Galactic extinction and redshift corrections, with variability not corrupting the median.
    Required to merge data from many catalogs and surveys.
  • domain assumption The H-beta based single-epoch black hole mass scaling relation (Eq. 2) is valid.
    Used to derive Lbol/L_Edd and in the tentative Hubble diagram; an empirical relation with known systematics.
  • domain assumption X-ray catalogs provide spectral fits with consistent corrections for HI absorption.
    The authors rely on published X-ray fits without re-deriving absorption corrections.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The spectral energy distribution of extreme population A quasars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CEEUK4D5

@misc{pith2026250522912,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The spectral energy distribution of extreme population A quasars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CEEUK4D5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22912}
}
read the original abstract

Knowledge of the broad-band active galactic nuclei (AGN) spectral energy distribution (SED) that ionizes the gas-rich broad emission line region is key to understanding the various radiative processes at play and their importance that eventually leads to the emission line formation. We modeled a spectral energy distribution for highly accreting quasars, also known as extreme population A sources, based mainly on observational data available in astronomical databases, and on accretion disk models for the unobservable far-UV domain. Our selection criterion is the RFeII parameter - the ratio of the optical FeII emission between 4434 A and 4684 A to the H-beta 4861 A intensity, RFeII > 1. This criterion is satisfied by highly-accreting, possibly super-Eddington, black holes. We analyzed 155 sources up to a redshift of approximately 1, previously reported in the literature, to construct a median radio-quiet SED spanning from radio to X-ray wavelengths. We find that the SED of quasars exhibits distinct features compared to lower accreting AGN, including a pronounced big blue bump and strong optical/UV emission along with a steep X-ray continuum. We classify the sources into radio-quiet, radio-intermediate, and radio-loud categories, observing that radio-intermediate and a subsample of radio-quiet AGN show a significant far-IR excess over the radio-quiet SED and the far-IR excess appears to be related to the prominence of Feii emission. There is an overall consistency between the new SED and the one obtained for high Eddington ratio quasars in previous work. We provide the SEDs in digital format for eventual applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22912 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stacked redshift distribution of the selected xA low redshift highly accreting quasars in the literature, each color shows the subsamples catalogs to identify xA sources, these catalogs provided us with insight from the x￾ray (green distributions), optical (pink distributions) and radio regions (blue distribution). The blue dashed line shows the general mean of the sample at 𝑧155 ≈ 0.295, red dashed line shows the m… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: stack distribution of sample redshifts. The green distribution shows the extremely high accretors of the sample (𝑅FeII≥ 1.5 ), which is the less populated subsample (N=45). The orange distribution shows the intermediate high accretors (1..1 < 𝑅FeII< 1.5) and the blue distribution shows the high accretors (𝑅FeII≲ 1.1) of the sample. This last subsample has the highest prevalence among highly accreting quasars. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Stack distributions of the logarithmic black hole mass (left) and the 𝐿bol/𝐿Edd (right) on a linear scale. The green distribution shows the extremely high accretors of the sample (𝑅FeII≳ 1.5 ), this is the less populated subsample. The orange distribution shows the intermediate high accretors (1.1< 𝑅FeII<1.5) and the blue distribution shows the high accretors (𝑅FeII≲ 1.1) of the sample. This last subsample correspon… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: All data modeled. The dotted lines show the individual SEDs modeled for RQ (blue), RI (red solid line) and RL (green dashed line) sources to construct a characteristic SED for xA sources. The black solid line shows the median of all 155 sources. The gold thick dotted l…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Spectral energy distributions corresponding to the median SED (second quartile, q2, thick black line), and the first and third quartile (q1 and q3, red and magenta lines). Abscissa is the logarithm of energy in units eV; ordinate is flux 𝜈 𝑓 (𝜈) in arbitrary unit…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Luminosity-scaled SEDs (second quartile, q2, thick blue line), and the first and third quartile (q1 and q3, red and magenta lines). Abscissa is the logarithm of energy in units eV; ordinate is optical luminosity at 5100 Å normalized by 1044.4 erg s−1 . Disk model SEDs …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between the median RQ, RI and RL SEDs. Top: blue solid line shows the median from 139 radio-quiet xA sources, blue dotted lines show the 139 individual SEDs (90% of the sample). Center and bottom: red and green dashed lines shows the median for radio-interme…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spectral energy distributions corresponding to the median SED (second quartile, q2, thick black line), with the shaded area between the first and third quartile, and the mid, high and highest 𝐿bol/𝐿Edd SED derived by Ferland et al. (2020, red, blue and magenta lines, r…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: RQ+RI SEDs grouped by 𝑅FeII parameter. Left: Median SEDs. The magenta line shows the SED for the sources with the highest 𝑅FeII parameter (𝑅FeII≥1.5), the blue line shows the SED for an intermediate range of 𝑅FeII parameter (1.1< 𝑅FeII<1.5), and the red line shows the …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Upper panels: Predictions for 𝑅FeII (left), equivalent width of Civ𝜆1549 (middle), intensity ratio Civ𝜆1549/H𝛽 as a function of log𝑈 and log 𝑛H (ordinate) and metallicity 𝑍 in solar units. The 𝑞2 SED normalized to the flux at 5100 Å has been used as an input to CLOUDY…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A tentative Hubble diagram, distance modulus 𝜇 vs redshift 𝑧 for the 155 quasars identified in this work and considered in the computation of the SED. Grey dots: individual data; red dots: averages over redshift bins of 𝛿𝑧 = 0.1. Error bars are sample standard deviati…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

175 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akylas A., Georgantopoulos I., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141186 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...655A..60A 655, A60

  2. [2]

    Bensch K., del Olmo A., Sulentic J., Perea J., Marziani P., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-015-9355-8 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JApA...36..467B 36, 467

  3. [3]

    Bischetti M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629301 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

  4. [4]

    F., Allen D

    Boksenberg A., Carswell R. F., Allen D. A., Fosbury R. A. E., Penston M. V., Sargent W. L. W., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/178.3.451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977MNRAS.178..451B 178, 451

  5. [5]

    N., Fink H., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9504093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...305...53B 305, 53

    Boller T., Brandt W. N., Fink H., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9504093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...305...53B 305, 53

  6. [6]

    J., Tr \"u mper J., Haberl F., Voges W., Nandra K., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...588A.103B 588, A103

    Boller T., Freyberg M. J., Tr \"u mper J., Haberl F., Voges W., Nandra K., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...588A.103B 588, A103

  7. [7]

    Bonzini M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1675 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.1079B 453, 1079

  8. [8]

    A., Green R

    Boroson T. A., Green R. F., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191661 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJS...80..109B 80, 109

Show all 175 references
  1. [9]

    L., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...392..377B 392, 377

    Bressan A., Silva L., Granato G. L., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...392..377B 392, 377

  2. [10]

    Brightman M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt920 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.2485B 433, 2485

  3. [11]

    Brown M. J. I., Duncan K. J., Landt H., Kirk M., Ricci C., Kamraj N., Salvato M., Ananna T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2324 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.3351B 489, 3351

  4. [12]

    Caccianiga A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv939 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.1795C 451, 1795

  5. [13]

    A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.051101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvL.120e1101C 120, 051101

    Cao Z., Nampalliwar S., Bambi C., Dauser T., Garc \' a J. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.051101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvL.120e1101C 120, 051101

  6. [14]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

  7. [15]

    Chatzikos M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023RMxAA..59..327C 59, 327

  8. [16]

    C., Banerji M., Richards G

    Coatman L., Hewett P. C., Banerji M., Richards G. T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1360 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461..647C 461, 647

  9. [17]

    C., Banerji M., Richards G

    Coatman L., Hewett P. C., Banerji M., Richards G. T., Hennawi J. F., Xavier Prochaska J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.tmp.1122C p. 1122

  10. [18]

    J., Kellermann K

    Condon J. J., Kellermann K. I., Kimball A. E., Ivezi \'c Z ., Perley R. A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...768...37C 768, 37

  11. [19]

    Czerny B., 2019, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe5050131 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Univ....5..131C 5, 131

  12. [20]

    Czerny B., Elvis M., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165630 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...321..305C 321, 305

  13. [21]

    D'Ammando F., 2019, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies7040087 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Galax...7...87D 7, 87

  14. [22]

    D'Ammando F., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1580 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.2213D 496, 2213

  15. [23]

    D'Onofrio M., Marziani P., 2018, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2018.00031 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018FrASS...5...31D 5, 31

  16. [24]

    A., 2024, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe10060254 , 10

    D'Onofrio M., Marziani P., Chiosi C., Negrete C. A., 2024, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe10060254 , 10

  17. [25]

    Danehkar A., 2024, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2024.1479301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024FrASS..1179301D 11, 1479301

  18. [26]

    M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243801 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...669A..83D 669, A83

    Deconto-Machado A., del Olmo Orozco A., Marziani P., Perea J., Stirpe G. M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243801 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...669A..83D 669, A83

  19. [27]

    Deconto-Machado A., del Olmo A., Marziani P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A..15D 691, A15

  20. [29]

    Du P., Wang J.-M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...42D 886, 42

  21. [30]

    Du P., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/45 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782...45D 782, 45

  22. [31]

    Du P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806...22D 806, 22

  23. [32]

    C., Li Y.-R., Bai J.-M., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L..14D 818, L14

    Du P., Wang J.-M., Hu C., Ho L. C., Li Y.-R., Bai J.-M., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L..14D 818, L14

  24. [33]

    Du P., et al., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...820...27D 820, 27

  25. [34]

    Du P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaae6b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856....6D 856, 6

  26. [35]

    Dultzin D., et al., 2020, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2019.00080 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020FrASS...6...80M 6, 80

  27. [36]

    Elvis M., et al., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJS...95....1E 95, 1

  28. [37]

    Esparza-Arredondo D., Gonzalez-Mart \' n O., Dultzin D., Masegosa J., Ramos-Almeida C., Garc \' a-Bernete I., Fritz J., Osorio-Clavijo N., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040043 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...651A..91E 651, A91

  29. [38]

    A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7db9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...54E 247, 54

    Evans P. A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7db9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...54E 247, 54

  30. [39]

    J., Corral A., Mateos S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt757 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433..648F 433, 648

    Fanali R., Caccianiga A., Severgnini P., Della Ceca R., Marchese E., Carrera F. J., Corral A., Mateos S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt757 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433..648F 433, 648

  31. [40]

    J., Done C., Jin C., Landt H., Ward M

    Ferland G. J., Done C., Jin C., Landt H., Ward M. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1207 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.5917F 494, 5917

  32. [41]

    Feruglio C., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...583A..99F 583, A99

  33. [42]

    arXiv:2405.04456

    Floris A., Marziani P., Panda S., Sniegowska M., D'Onofrio M., Deconto-Machado A., Del Olmo A., Czerny B., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04456 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240504456F p. arXiv:2405.04456

  34. [43]

    Foschini L., et al., 2021, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe7100372 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Univ....7..372F 7, 372

  35. [44]

    A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630A.110G 630, A110

    Ganci V., Marziani P., D'Onofrio M., del Olmo A., Bon E., Bon N., Negrete C. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630A.110G 630, A110

  36. [45]

    A., Marziani P., Dultzin D., \'S niegowska M., Panda S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142837 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A.105G 667, A105

    Garnica K., Negrete C. A., Marziani P., Dultzin D., \'S niegowska M., Panda S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142837 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A.105G 667, A105

  37. [46]

    Grupe D., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/382516 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....127.1799G 127, 1799

  38. [47]

    C., Mannheim K., Fink H

    Grupe D., Beuermann K., Thomas H. C., Mannheim K., Fink H. H., 1998, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...330...25G 330, 25

  39. [48]

    J., Leighly K

    Grupe D., Wills B. J., Leighly K. M., Meusinger H., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/380233 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....127..156G 127, 156

  40. [49]

    M., Page K

    Grupe D., Komossa S., Leighly K. M., Page K. L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/187/1/64 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJS..187...64G 187, 64

  41. [50]

    M., van Hoof P

    Gunasekera C. M., van Hoof P. A. M., Chatzikos M., Ferland G. J., 2023, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ad0e75 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023RNAAS...7..246G 7, 246

  42. [51]

    Haardt F., Maraschi L., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186171 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...380L..51H 380, L51

  43. [52]

    Haardt F., Maraschi L., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...413..507H 413, 507

  44. [53]

    Hamann F., Ferland G., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173366 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...418...11H 418, 11

  45. [54]

    A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770..103H 770, 103

    Harrison F. A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770..103H 770, 103

  46. [55]

    Huang J., Luo B., Du P., Hu C., Wang J.-M., Li Y.-J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9019 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...895..114H 895, 114

  47. [57]

    M., Reynolds C., Dai L., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature18007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Natur.535..388K 535, 388

    Kara E., Miller J. M., Reynolds C., Dai L., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature18007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Natur.535..388K 535, 388

  48. [58]

    Kauffmann G., Mill \'a n-Irigoyen I., Crowther P., Maraston C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527..150K 527, 150

  49. [59]

    I., Sramek R., Schmidt M., Shaffer D

    Kellermann K. I., Sramek R., Schmidt M., Shaffer D. B., Green R., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115207 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989AJ.....98.1195K 98, 1195

  50. [60]

    King A., Pounds K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122316 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA&A..53..115K 53, 115

  51. [61]

    Kubota A., Done C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1890 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.1247K 480, 1247

  52. [62]

    Kubota A., Done C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489..524K 489, 524

  53. [63]

    Lanzuisi G., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628325 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...590A..77L 590, A77

  54. [64]

    J., McDowell J

    Laor A., Fiore F., Elvis M., Wilkes B. J., McDowell J. C., 1997, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/303696 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...477...93L 477, 93

  55. [65]

    L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ace619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953L..29L 953, L29

    Larson R. L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ace619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953L..29L 953, L29

  56. [66]

    Laurenti M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A..57L 657, A57

  57. [67]

    M., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313287 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..125..317L 125, 317

    Leighly K. M., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313287 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..125..317L 125, 317

  58. [68]

    M., Moore J

    Leighly K. M., Moore J. R., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422088 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..107L 611, 107

  59. [69]

    Lewin C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac978f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...939..109L 939, 109

  60. [70]

    C., Hong S., Engelbracht C

    Li Y., Calzetti D., Kennicutt R. C., Hong S., Engelbracht C. W., Dale D. A., Moustakas J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/677 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...725..677L 725, 677

  61. [71]

    arXiv:2502.18856

    Li Y.-R., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2502.18856 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250218856L p. arXiv:2502.18856

  62. [72]

    Lipari S., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174884 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...436..102L 436, 102

  63. [73]

    Lipari S., Terlevich R., Macchetto F., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172456 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...406..451L 406, 451

  64. [74]

    J., Taniguchi Y., Zheng W., Tsvetanov Z., Carranza G., Dottori H., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06309.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.340..289L 340, 289

    L \' pari S., Terlevich R., D \' az R. J., Taniguchi Y., Zheng W., Tsvetanov Z., Carranza G., Dottori H., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06309.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.340..289L 340, 289

  65. [75]

    N., Brotherton M

    Liu H., Luo B., Brandt W. N., Brotherton M. S., Gallagher S. C., Ni Q., Shemmer O., Timlin J. D. I., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe37f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..103L 910, 103

  66. [76]

    M., Davidson K., Gull T

    MacAlpine G. M., Davidson K., Gull T. R., Wu C. C., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163282 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...294..147M 294, 147

  67. [77]

    A., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..582M 268, 582

    Malkan M. A., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..582M 268, 582

  68. [78]

    A., Sargent W

    Malkan M. A., Sargent W. L. W., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159701 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...254...22M 254, 22

  69. [79]

    Marinello M., Rodr \' guez-Ardila A., Marziani P., Sigut A., Pradhan A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa934 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.4187M 494, 4187

  70. [80]

    L., Dultzin D., Marziani P., Sulentic J

    Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., Dultzin D., Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Bressan A., Chen Y., Stirpe G. M., 2015, @doi [ApJS] 10.1088/0067-0049/217/1/3 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..217....3L 217, 3

  71. [81]

    L., Del Olmo A., Marziani P., Sulentic J

    Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., Del Olmo A., Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., Perea J., D'Onofrio M., 2018, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2017.00065 , 4, 65

  72. [82]

    L., Panda S., Czerny B., Marinello M., Marziani P., Dultzin D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac03b6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...918...29M 918, 29

    Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., Panda S., Czerny B., Marinello M., Marziani P., Dultzin D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac03b6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...918...29M 918, 29

  73. [83]

    W., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.1211M 442, 1211

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.1211M 442, 1211

  74. [84]

    W., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Calvani M., Moles M., 1996, @doi [ApJS] 10.1086/192291 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJS..104...37M 104, 37

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Calvani M., Moles M., 1996, @doi [ApJS] 10.1086/192291 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJS..104...37M 104, 37

  75. [85]

    W., Zwitter T., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Calvani M., 2001, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/322286 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...558..553M 558, 553

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Zwitter T., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Calvani M., 2001, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/322286 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...558..553M 558, 553

  76. [87]

    W., Zamanov R., Calvani M., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Bachev R., Zwitter T., 2003b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/346025 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJS..145..199M 145, 199

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Zamanov R., Calvani M., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Bachev R., Zwitter T., 2003b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/346025 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJS..145..199M 145, 199

  77. [88]

    K., Sulentic J

    Marziani P., Zamanov R. K., Sulentic J. W., Calvani M., 2003c, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07033.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345.1133M 345, 1133

  78. [89]

    W., 2006, in Kreitler P

    Marziani P., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Sulentic J. W., 2006, in Kreitler P. V., ed., , New Developments in Black Hole Research. Nova Press, New York, p. 123

  79. [90]

    W., Negrete C

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., Zamfir S., Bachev R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17357.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.409.1033M 409, 1033

  80. [91]

    W., Plauchu-Frayn I., del Olmo A., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321374 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...555A..89M 555, A89

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Plauchu-Frayn I., del Olmo A., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321374 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...555A..89M 555, A89

  81. [92]

    W., Plauchu-Frayn I., del Olmo A., 2013b, AAp, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1305.1096M 555, 89, 16pp

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Plauchu-Frayn I., del Olmo A., 2013b, AAp, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1305.1096M 555, 89, 16pp

  82. [93]

    A., Sulentic J

    Marziani P., Mart \' nez Carballo M. A., Sulentic J. W., Del Olmo A., Stirpe G. M., Dultzin D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-015-2611-1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Ap

  83. [94]

    A., Dultzin D., Mart \' nez-Aldama M

    Marziani P., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., Del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., Stirpe G. M., 2017, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2017.00016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017FrASS...4...16M 4, 16

  84. [95]

    Marziani P., et al., 2021a, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abe46a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021RNAAS...5...25M 5, 25

  85. [96]

    Marziani P., Berton M., Panda S., Bon E., 2021b, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe7120484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Univ....7..484M 7, 484

  86. [97]

    Marziani P., Panda S., Deconto Machado A., Del Olmo A., 2023, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies11020052 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Galax..11...52M 11, 52

  87. [98]

    M., Negrete C

    Marziani P., Garnica Luna K., Floris A., del Olmo A., Deconto-Machado A., Buendia-Rios T. M., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., 2025, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe11020069 , 11

  88. [99]

    G., Ferland G

    Mathews W. G., Ferland G. J., 1987, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/165843 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...323..456M 323, 456

  89. [100]

    A., Kaastra J

    Mehdipour M., Kriss G. A., Kaastra J. S., Costantini E., Gu L., Landt H., Mao J., Rogantini D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bcb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962..155M 962, 155

  90. [101]

    E., Lira P., Netzer H., Trakhtenbrot B., Capellupo D

    Mej \' a-Restrepo J. E., Lira P., Netzer H., Trakhtenbrot B., Capellupo D. M., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0305-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2...63M 2, 63

  91. [102]

    C., Brandt W

    Miniutti G., Fabian A. C., Brandt W. N., Gallo L. C., Boller T., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00669.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.396L..85M 396, L85

  92. [103]

    Mochizuki Y., Mizumoto M., Ebisawa K., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2329 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525..922M 525, 922

  93. [104]

    A., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/268.2.405 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.268..405N 268, 405

    Nandra K., Pounds K. A., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/268.2.405 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.268..405N 268, 405

  94. [105]

    Nardini E., et al., 2015, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1259202 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Sci...347..860N 347, 860

  95. [106]

    Negrete A., Dultzin D., Marziani P., Sulentic J., 2012, ApJ, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011arXiv1107.3188N 757, 62

  96. [107]

    A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.118N 620, A118

    Negrete C. A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.118N 620, A118

  97. [108]

    Netzer H., Lani C., Nordon R., Trakhtenbrot B., Lira P., Shemmer O., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/123 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819..123N 819, 123

  98. [109]

    Onoue M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aca9d3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...942L..17O 942, L17

  99. [110]

    Padovani P., 2017a, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0194 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NatAs...1E.194P 1, 0194

  100. [111]

    Padovani P., 2017b, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2017.00035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017FrASS...4...35P 4, 35

  101. [112]

    S., 2019, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-019-9604-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019JApA...40...39P 40, 39

    Paliya V. S., 2019, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-019-9604-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019JApA...40...39P 40, 39

  102. [113]

    Panagiotou C., Walter R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937390 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...640A..31P 640, A31

  103. [114]

    Panda S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140393 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...650A.154P 650, A154

  104. [115]

    Panda S., Marziani P., 2023, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2023.1130103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023FrASS..1030103P 10, 1130103

  105. [116]

    P., Hryniewicz K., Wildy C., Kuraszkiewicz J., \'S niegowska M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae209 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866..115P 866, 115

    Panda S., Czerny B., Adhikari T. P., Hryniewicz K., Wildy C., Kuraszkiewicz J., \'S niegowska M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae209 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866..115P 866, 115

  106. [117]

    Panda S., Czerny B., Done C., Kubota A., 2019a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab11cb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...875..133P 875, 133

  107. [118]

    Panda S., Marziani P., Czerny B., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882...79P 882, 79

  108. [119]

    Panda S., Marziani P., Czerny B., 2020, @doi [Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso] 10.31577/caosp.2020.50.1.293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020CoSka..50..293P 50, 293

  109. [120]

    Panda S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ad3549 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJS..272...11P 272, 11

  110. [121]

    Panessa F., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19268.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417.2426P 417, 2426

  111. [122]

    S., Neff S

    Perry J., Dyson J., 1992, in Holt S. S., Neff S. G., Urry C. M., eds, American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol. 254, Testing the AGN paradigm. AIP, pp 553--555, @doi 10.1063/1.42236

  112. [123]

    M., et al., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/256.3.589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.256..589P 256, 589

    Puchnarewicz E. M., et al., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/256.3.589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.256..589P 256, 589

  113. [124]

    Rafanelli P., La Mura G., Bindoni D., Ciroi S., Cracco V., Di Mille F., Vaona L., 2011, @doi [Baltic Astronomy] 10.1515/astro-2017-0313 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011BaltA..20..419R 20, 419

  114. [125]

    N., O'Brien P

    Reeves J. N., O'Brien P. T., Vaughan S., Law-Green D., Ward M., Simpson C., Pounds K. A., Edelson R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03282.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.312L..17R 312, L17

  115. [126]

    N., O'Brien P

    Reeves J. N., O'Brien P. T., Ward M. J., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...593L..65R 593, L65

  116. [127]

    Ricci C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa96ad , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..233...17R 233, 17

  117. [128]

    T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..166..470R 166, 470

    Richards G. T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..166..470R 166, 470

  118. [129]

    Risaliti G., Young M., Elvis M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/L6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...700L...6R 700, L6

  119. [130]

    A., Dias dos Santos D., Panda S., Marinello M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad36bf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167..244R 167, 244

    Rodr \' guez-Ardila A., Fonseca-Faria M. A., Dias dos Santos D., Panda S., Marinello M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad36bf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167..244R 167, 244

  120. [131]

    C., Shang Z., Brotherton M

    Runnoe J. C., Shang Z., Brotherton M. S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1528 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435.3251R 435, 3251

  121. [132]

    Rupke D. S. N., Veilleux S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/729/2/L27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...729L..27R 729, L27

  122. [133]

    Saccheo I., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244296 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A..34S 671, A34

  123. [134]

    B., Mirabel I

    Sanders D. B., Mirabel I. F., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.749 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ARA&A..34..749S 34, 749

  124. [135]

    B., Soifer B

    Sanders D. B., Soifer B. T., Elias J. H., Madore B. F., Matthews K., Neugebauer G., Scoville N. Z., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165983 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...325...74S 325, 74

  125. [136]

    C., Trakhtenbrot B., Sturm E., Boller T., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16217.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403.1246S 403, 1246

    Sani E., Lutz D., Risaliti G., Netzer H., Gallo L. C., Trakhtenbrot B., Sturm E., Boller T., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16217.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403.1246S 403, 1246

  126. [137]

    Shang Z., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/2 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..196....2S 196, 2

  127. [138]

    N., Netzer H., Maiolino R., Kaspi S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/588776 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...682...81S 682, 81

    Shemmer O., Brandt W. N., Netzer H., Maiolino R., Kaspi S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/588776 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...682...81S 682, 81

  128. [139]

    C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature13712 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.513..210S 513, 210

    Shen Y., Ho L. C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature13712 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.513..210S 513, 210

  129. [140]

    L., del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1c8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..115S 910, 115

    \'S niegowska M., Marziani P., Czerny B., Panda S., Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1c8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..115S 910, 115

  130. [141]

    A., Malkan M

    Spinoglio L., Fern \'a ndez-Ontiveros J. A., Malkan M. A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad23e4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964..117S 964, 117

  131. [142]

    R., Calzetti D., Kinney A

    Storchi-Bergmann T., Schmitt H. R., Calzetti D., Kinney A. L., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300242 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....115..909S 115, 909

  132. [143]

    W., Marziani P., Dultzin-Hacyan D., 2000a, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.521 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ARA\

    Sulentic J. W., Marziani P., Dultzin-Hacyan D., 2000a, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.521 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ARA\

  133. [144]

    W., Zwitter T., Marziani P., Dultzin-Hacyan D., 2000b, @doi [ApJL] 10.1086/312717 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536L...5S 536, L5

    Sulentic J. W., Zwitter T., Marziani P., Dultzin-Hacyan D., 2000b, @doi [ApJL] 10.1086/312717 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536L...5S 536, L5

  134. [145]

    W., Marziani P., Zamanov R., Bachev R., Calvani M., Dultzin-Hacyan D., 2002, @doi [ApJL] 10.1086/339594 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...566L..71S 566, L71

    Sulentic J. W., Marziani P., Zamanov R., Bachev R., Calvani M., Dultzin-Hacyan D., 2002, @doi [ApJL] 10.1086/339594 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...566L..71S 566, L71

  135. [146]

    Sulentic J. W., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Marziani P., Bongardo C., Braito V., Calvani M., Zamanov R., 2006a, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006RMxAA..42...23S 42, 23

  136. [147]

    W., Repetto P., Stirpe G

    Sulentic J. W., Repetto P., Stirpe G. M., Marziani P., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Calvani M., 2006b, @doi [A&Ap] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054153 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A26A...456..929S 456, 929

  137. [148]

    W., Bachev R., Marziani P., Negrete C

    Sulentic J. W., Bachev R., Marziani P., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...666..757S 666, 757

  138. [149]

    W., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630309 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    Sulentic J. W., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630309 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

  139. [150]

    Sun J., Shen Y., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L15 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...804L..15S 804, L15

  140. [151]

    O., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732382 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...614A..37T 614, A37

    Tortosa A., Bianchi S., Marinucci A., Matt G., Petrucci P. O., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732382 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...614A..37T 614, A37

  141. [152]

    Tortosa A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.3599T 509, 3599

  142. [153]

    Tortosa A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3590 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.6267T 519, 6267

  143. [154]

    Trakhtenbrot B., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470..800T 470, 800

  144. [155]

    V., Fabian A

    Vasudevan R. V., Fabian A. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381.1235V 381, 1235

  145. [156]

    P., V \'e ron P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...374...92V 374, 92

    V \'e ron-Cetty M. P., V \'e ron P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...374...92V 374, 92

  146. [157]

    M., 2006, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/500572 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...641..689V 641, 689

    Vestergaard M., Peterson B. M., 2006, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/500572 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...641..689V 641, 689

  147. [158]

    Vietri G., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732335 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...617A..81V 617, A81

  148. [159]

    Vietri G., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...644A.175V 644, A175

  149. [160]

    H., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&A...274..105W 274, 105

    Walter R., Fink H. H., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&A...274..105W 274, 105

  150. [161]

    Wang J.-M., Netzer H., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021511 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A

  151. [162]

    Wang J.-M., Zhou Y.-Y., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307080 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...516..420W 516, 420

  152. [163]

    Wang J.-M., Du P., Valls-Gabaud D., Hu C., Netzer H., 2013, @doi [Physical Review Letters] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.081301 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhRvL.110h1301W 110, 081301

  153. [164]

    C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/65 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...797...65W 797, 65

    Wang J.-M., Qiu J., Du P., Ho L. C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/65 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...797...65W 797, 65

  154. [165]

    Wang J.-M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acdf48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954...84W 954, 84

  155. [166]

    Wildy C., Czerny B., Panda S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935620 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...632A..41W 632, A41

  156. [167]

    J., Kuraszkiewicz J., Green P

    Wilkes B. J., Kuraszkiewicz J., Green P. J., Mathur S., McDowell J. C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306828 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...513...76W 513, 76

  157. [168]

    R., Gallo L

    Wilkins D. R., Gallo L. C., Costantini E., Brandt W. N., Blandford R. D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-021-03667-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Natur.595..657W 595, 657

  158. [169]

    Wolf J., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa018 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.3580W 492, 3580

  159. [170]

    Xu F., Bian F., Shen Y., Zuo W., Fan X., Zhu Z., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1763 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480..345X 480, 345

  160. [171]

    H., et al., 2024, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stae725 , 529, 3939

    Yue B. H., et al., 2024, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stae725 , 529, 3939

  161. [172]

    H., et al., 2025, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staf077 , 537, 858

    Yue B. H., et al., 2025, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staf077 , 537, 858

  162. [173]

    S., Reddy N

    Yun M. S., Reddy N. A., Condon J. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...554..803Y 554, 803

  163. [174]

    W., Marziani P., 2008, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13290.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.387..856Z 387, 856

    Zamfir S., Sulentic J. W., Marziani P., 2008, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13290.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.387..856Z 387, 856

  164. [175]

    Zappacosta L., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635L...5Z 635, L5

  165. [176]

    arXiv:2407.08596

    Zhang Z., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2407.08596 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240708596Z p. arXiv:2407.08596

  166. [177]

    Zhou H., Wang T., Yuan W., Lu H., Dong X., Wang J., Lu Y., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504869 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..166..128Z 166, 128

  167. [178]

    P., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L..42V 518, L42

    van der Werf P. P., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L..42V 518, L42

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.