Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CMEs during the Two Activity Peaks in Cycle 24 and their Space Weather Consequences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1509.04216 v2 pith:CFEASCRO submitted 2015-09-14 astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords duringcmespeakeventspeaksspaceweatherassociated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We report on a comparison between space weather events that occurred around the two peaks in the sunspot number (SSN) during solar cycle 24. The two SSN peaks occurred in the years 2012 and 2014. Even though SSN was larger during the second peak, we find that there were more space weather events during the first peak. The space weather events we considered are large solar energetic particle (SEP) events and major geomagnetic storms associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs). We also considered interplanetary type II radio bursts, which are indicative of energetic CMEs driving shocks. When we compared the CME properties between the two SSN peaks, we find that more energetic CMEs occurred during the 2012 peak. In particular, we find that CMEs accompanying IP type II bursts had an average speed of 1543 km/s during the 2012 peak compared to 1201 km/s during the 2014 peak. This result is consistent with the reduction in the average speed of the general population of CMEs during the second peak. All SEP events were associated with the interplanetary type II bursts, which are better than halo CMEs as indicators of space weather. The comparison between the two peaks also revealed that the discordant behavior between the CME rate and SSN was more pronounced during the second peak. None of the 14 disk-center halo CMEs was associated with a major storm in 2014. The lone major storm in 2014 was due to the intensification of the (southward) magnetic field in the associated magnetic cloud by a shock that caught up and propagated into the magnetic cloud.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 15 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Type II radio bursts and space weather phenomena: A statistical study

    astro-ph.SR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    During solar cycle 24, 518 type II radio bursts split into metric-only, metric+DH, and DH-only show 71-77% association with flares and CMEs but much weaker association with interplanetary shocks, particles, and geomag...

Pith tools