Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Scholarly outputs of EU Research Funding Programs: Understanding differences between datasets of publications reported by grant holders and OpenAIRE Research Graph in H2020

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.10638 v1 pith:CFXJDZOZ submitted 2021-09-22 cs.DL

classification cs.DL
keywords researchdatafundingprogramsgraphopenairepublicationsscholarly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Linking research results to grants is an essential prerequisite for an effective monitoring and evaluation of funding programs. For the EU research funding programs, there are multiple datasets linking scholarly publications to the individual grants, including both open data and those from commercial bibliometric databases. In this paper, we systematically compare openly available data from two data sources: on one hand those reported by the Grant holders (and subsequently published by the European Commission on open data portal) and those from the OpenAIRE Research Graph which collect data from multiple sources. We describe the dataflow leading to their creation and assess the quality of data by validating, on sample basis, the link <project, publications>. We report that, by and large, OpenAIRE Research Graph offers a more complete dataset of scholarly outputs of from EU Research funding programs. We identify also possible improvements and make recommendations on how they can be addressed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analysing the coverage of the University of Bologna's bibliographic and citation metadata in OpenCitations collections

    cs.DL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    About 36% of the 402,505 records in the University of Bologna's IRIS system could be matched into OpenCitations, but citations per record there (35.3) are close to Scopus (36.0) and Web of Science (34.7).

Pith tools