Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Phonon-polariton mediated dual electromagnetically induced transparency-like response in a THz metamaterial

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Strongly coupling a terahertz EIT-like metamaterial to a perovskite phonon splits its single transparency window into two, producing a dual EIT-like response that can be switched without altering the metamaterial structure.

desk verdict Genuine experimental result: phonon-coupled EIT metamaterial shows two transparency windows, and the field/group-delay evidence supports the dual-EIT claim; the Eq. 5 model is a post hoc fit, not a derivation, but it is not load-bearing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02151 v1 pith:CG3QNIB7 submitted 2025-09-02 physics.optics

Amit Haldar , Kshitij V Goyal , Ruturaj V Puranik , Vivek Dwij , Srijan Maity , Kanha Ram Khator , Subhashis Ghosh , Bhagwat S. Chouhan
show 4 more authors
Gagan Kumar Satyaprasad P. Senanayak Shriganesh Prabhu Shovon Pal
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords terahertzmetamaterialsphonon-polaritonsstrongcouplingelectromagneticallyinducedtransparencydualEIT-likelead-halideperovskiteslowlight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that placing a lead-halide perovskite film on a terahertz metamaterial and strongly coupling its phonon mode to the metamaterial's two resonators splits the usual single transparency window into two distinct transparency windows, a dual electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT)-like response. The transition happens without changing the metamaterial geometry: it is controlled by whether the phonon is active. The authors also show that rotating the structure's polarization or translating its resonators continuously converts the dual-EIT response into ordinary phonon-polariton strong coupling. If correct, this gives a single, switchable platform for THz filtering, slow light, and multi-channel sensing.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the combination of bright-dark EIT with phonon strong coupling. The rod is the bright mode directly excited by the incident THz field; the SRR pair is the dark mode excited near-field by the rod. Adding the MAPbI3 phonon creates two Rabi-split polaritonic branches for each resonator, and the overlapping upper and lower polaritonic states each form their own bright-dark EIT pair. The net transmission is modeled as the sum of two independent EIT transparency windows, one per polaritonic branch, described by a modified coupled-oscillator equation.

What would settle it

Measure the complex transmission (amplitude and phase) of the hybrid structure with the phonon active and compare the phase response to the incoherent superposition model: coherent interference between the two EIT channels would produce a single coupled dispersion feature with phase jumps different from the sum of two independent EIT windows, especially between 0.9 and 1.2 THz.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates a hybrid phonon-EIT system in which a THz metamaterial composed of a rod bright mode and a split-ring resonator (SRR) dark mode is strongly coupled to the 0.97 THz transverse optical phonon of MAPbI3. With the phonon active, the single EIT peak at 1.3 THz splits into two transparency windows at 0.9 THz and 1.2 THz. The authors attribute this to a two-step process: both the rod and the SRR individually hybridize with the phonon to form lower and upper polaritonic states, and the overlapping polaritonic states at each frequency act as bright-dark pairs that destructively interfere, yielding two EIT-like windows. The dual-EIT nature is confirmed through simulated in-plane

Load-bearing premise

The dual-EIT interpretation rests on treating the measured spectrum as the sum of two independent, non-interfering transparency windows, with the parameters of each window fitted to simulation; if the two channels actually interfere coherently, the spectral shape and the EIT assignment would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single metamaterial design can act as either a single-band or dual-band THz transparency filter, with the switch driven by phonon activation rather than by re-etching the structure.
  • Rotating the input polarization by 90 degrees reversibly transitions the system between the dual-EIT response and conventional phonon-polariton Rabi splitting, providing a continuous optical control knob.
  • The group delay splits into two peaks at the transparency frequencies, enabling multi-channel slow-light operation in the THz range.
  • The effective Rabi splitting of the combined system is larger than that of either resonator alone, an effect the authors attribute to slow-light enhancement of the interaction time.
  • The architecture is compatible with solution-processed perovskite films and maskless lithography, pointing toward scalable, wafer-level THz devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two transparency windows are truly independent channels, then tuning only one polaritonic branch (for example by shifting the phonon frequency) should shift only one window; a targeted experiment varying the phonon frequency could test this directly.
  • The paper models the dual EIT as an incoherent sum of two independent EIT windows; a full coherent coupled-mode treatment including cross-coupling between the channels might reveal Fano-like line-shape distortions if the channels actually interfere.
  • The same mechanism may generalize to any metamaterial EIT system placed near a material with a sharp phonon or excitonic resonance, potentially producing multiple or tunable transparency windows without redesign.
  • The enhanced effective Rabi splitting under EIT suggests that further reducing losses - for example with sharper phonon modes or higher-Q resonators - could push hybrid systems toward ultrastrong coupling while preserving dual transparency windows.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a THz metamaterial consisting of a rod (bright) and paired SRRs (dark) that exhibits an EIT-like transparency peak at 1.3 THz. By spin-coating a MAPbI3 film with a 0.97 THz phonon mode, the authors observe that the single EIT peak splits into two transparency windows at 0.9 and 1.2 THz. They attribute this to strong coupling of both the rod and SRR to the phonon, forming lower and upper polaritonic branches that each support an EIT window. The dual-EIT interpretation is supported by CST simulations, in-plane electric field distributions, group-delay measurements, and polarization-rotation/translation experiments that switch between dual-EIT and conventional strong-coupling responses. The theoretical modeling uses a superposition of two independent EIT transparencies (Eq. 5 in SI S8).

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the paper demonstrates a reversible single-to-dual EIT transition without structural modification, combining phonon-polariton strong coupling with metamaterial EIT in the THz range. The experimental transmittance data, reproducibility across samples, field-distribution evidence, and group-delay measurements are valuable and support the phenomenology. The work is likely to interest the THz metamaterial and strong-coupling communities. However, the theoretical confirmation of 'dual EIT' currently rests on a post hoc superposition model whose validity is not established, and the rod strong-coupling regime is not quantified. These issues are addressable and do not negate the experimental observations.

major comments (3)
  1. [SI S8, Eq. (5)] The net transmittance in the hybrid system is modeled as T = 1 - |A_lp|^2 - |A_up|^2, i.e., two independent EIT transparency windows with no cross terms between lower and upper polaritonic branches. This ansatz is introduced ad hoc, and all parameters are extracted by fitting Eq. (5) to the CST-simulated spectra (Fig. 3c). The lower and upper branches share the same phonon mode and the same SRR dark mode; coherent interference between them is not modeled. If interference is significant, the apparent transparency windows could be Fano-like artifacts rather than separate EIT features. The authors should either derive Eq. (5) from a three-oscillator model under an explicit approximation (including the neglected cross terms), or show numerically that the interference terms are negligible, or rephrase the 'theoretical' curve as a phenomenological fit. As written, the central claim of dual EIT
  2. [Main text, Section II, Eqs. (1)-(2) and Fig. 2] The strong-coupling condition is quantified only for the SRR-phonon system (values of Γ_ph, Γ_SRR, V, and V_st are given). For the rod-phonon system, the text states 'Similar calculations also validate the strong coupling regime for the rod metamaterial' but provides no numerical values. Since the dual-EIT interpretation relies on both the rod and SRR undergoing Rabi splitting, the rod strong-coupling condition should be quantified explicitly: Γ_rod, Ω_R, and V compared with the threshold. Without this, the reader cannot verify that both polaritonic branches are in the strong-coupling regime.
  3. [Main text, Section II, after Fig. 3e] The 'effective Rabi frequency' in the combined system is defined as the frequency difference between the two observed transparency peaks (0.33 THz) and is used to claim an increase in splitting. This is an operational definition, not a derived quantity; in a coupled-mode description the splitting would depend on the coupling matrix elements. The claim that slow light increases the splitting should be supported by a calculation or at least softened, because the definition is circular if the peaks are themselves EIT peaks rather than polariton dips.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 and Fig. 4] The upper-polaritonic-EIT peak is at 1.2 THz in Fig. 3b, but Fig. 4d and the text describe the field distribution at 1.3 THz as the upper-polaritonic-EIT peak. Please make the frequency labeling consistent between the experimental and simulated cases.
  2. [SI S8, Eq. (3)] In Eq. (3), the damping terms are written as γ without specifying whether they are angular-frequency half-widths or ordinary frequencies. Table 1 lists γ values in THz; please clarify the units consistently with the complex response function.
  3. [SI S8] The section is titled 'two-coupled, three-level system', but Eq. (5) is actually a sum of two independent two-oscillator models. Consider renaming the section or adding a sentence explaining how the three-level picture maps onto the equations.
  4. [Main text, Fig. 5 and surrounding text] The negative group delay in Fig. 5b is mentioned but not quantitatively discussed. A brief comment on the magnitude and potential origin would help the reader.
  5. [References] Reference [47] is an arXiv preprint; if a published version exists, it should be cited instead.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Dual-EIT 'theoretical confirmation' is produced by fitting a two-independent-window ansatz to the same simulated spectrum; effective Rabi frequency is defined as observed peak separation.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplementary Information S8, Eq. (5); main text Fig. 3c]
    "In such a case, the net transmittance is then given by the superposition of the obtained transparency windows, i.e., TdEIT = 1 − |...|^2 − |...|^2 (5) This model fits quite nicely to the simulated data as shown in Figure. 3c of the main manuscript. All the fitting parameters for the hybrid system are extracted by fitting Eq. 5 to the simulated data."

    The 'theoretically obtained' dual-EIT spectrum is presented as confirmation of the dual-EIT interpretation, but Eq. 5 is constructed by assuming two independent transparency windows (lower- and upper-polaritonic EIT) and then fitting all parameters to the simulated spectrum it is meant to explain. The model therefore cannot independently validate the dual-EIT assignment; it is a post hoc re-parameterization of the simulated lineshape, and any two-peak structure would be reproduced by construction.

  2. self definitional [Main text, Section II, discussion of Fig. 3e]
    "According to our interpretation of the polaritonic dips leading to the emergence of EIT-like peaks, the effective Rabi frequency in the combined system is simply the frequency difference between the two observed peaks. Interestingly, applying this definition to the combined system for fEIT = 0.9 THz, yields an effective increase in the splitting to 0.33 THz compared to the individual rod and SRR case."

    The effective Rabi frequency is defined as the frequency difference between the two observed peaks, so the reported 'increase in splitting' is true by definition rather than a derived physical consequence. It restates the observed peak separation and does not independently quantify strong coupling or validate the EIT interpretation.

full rationale

The experimental observation of two transmission maxima and the phonon on/off simulations provide independent evidence that the phonon mode modifies the EIT spectrum, and I found no load-bearing self-citation chain or imported-uniqueness argument. However, the paper's theoretical 'confirmation' of dual EIT is circular in the specific sense captured by the patterns: the dual-EIT spectrum in Fig. 3c is generated by fitting Eq. 5, a model that already assumes two independent transparency windows, to the same simulated data it is claimed to confirm. All parameters are extracted from that fit, so the agreement is guaranteed by construction and cannot constitute an independent test. The definition of the effective Rabi frequency as the observed peak separation is likewise tautological. These issues affect the interpretation of the peaks as 'dual EIT' but not the raw experimental finding, so the overall circularity is partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard electromagnetic simulation and coupled-oscillator modeling, with the key free parameters being the oscillator frequencies, dampings, and coupling coefficients obtained by fitting to simulated data. The most ad hoc element is the superposition ansatz for the dual EIT spectrum (Eq. 5). No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • Bright mode resonance frequency ω_b = Fitted to simulated spectra (Fig S10b)
    Used in CCO model (Eq. 3) to reproduce single EIT transmittance; value set by fitting to CST simulations.
  • Dark mode resonance frequency ω_d = Fitted to simulated spectra (Fig S10b)
    Used in CCO model (Eq. 3) along with ω_b; determined by fitting to CST simulations.
  • Bright mode damping rate γ_b = Fitted to simulated spectra (Fig S10b)
    Damping of the rod resonance in the CCO model; obtained from fits to simulated transmittance.
  • Dark mode damping rate γ_d = Fitted to simulated spectra (Fig S10b)
    Damping of the SRR resonance in the CCO model; obtained from fits to simulated transmittance.
  • Bright-field coupling coefficient g = Fitted to simulated spectra (Fig S10a)
    Coupling of the bright mode to the incident THz field in the CCO model; extracted from fitting Eq. 3.
  • Bright-dark coupling coefficient κ = Fitted to simulated spectra (Fig S10a)
    Near-field coupling between rod and SRR in the CCO model; extracted from fitting Eq. 3 to simulated data.
  • Hybrid dual-EIT parameters (ω_b,lp, ω_b,up, ω_d,lp, ω_d,up, γ_b,lp, γ_b,up, γ_d,lp, γ_d,up, g_b,lp, g_b,up, κ_lp, κ_up) = Fitted to simulated hybrid spectra (Fig S10c-d)
    Parameters of the superposition model (Eq. 5) for dual EIT; all extracted by fitting to CST simulations of the hybrid structure.
  • MAPbI3 phonon Lorentz oscillator parameters = Not specified explicitly
    Simulated transmittance of the perovskite film is matched to the measured phonon at 0.97 THz by optimizing parameters in CST; exact values not provided.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Bright-dark coupled oscillator model (CCO) describes the EIT-like response
    The transmission spectrum is modeled by two coupled oscillators (Eqs. 1-3), assuming only the bright mode couples to the incident field. This is standard in metamaterial EIT literature.
  • domain assumption Strong coupling criterion V > sqrt((Γ_ph^2 + Γ_MM^2)/2)
    Used to assert the system is in the strong coupling regime, following coupled oscillator theory. The criterion is applied to the SRR and claimed for the rod without explicit calculation.
  • domain assumption MAPbI3 TO phonon at 0.97 THz is the relevant excitation
    The phonon mode frequency and oscillator strength are taken from prior literature (refs 70,71) and confirmed by THz-TDS measurements.
  • ad hoc to paper Net transmittance in the hybrid is the superposition of two independent transparency windows (Eq. 5)
    This superposition model is introduced specifically to fit the dual EIT spectra; it assumes no interference between the two EIT channels. It is not derived from a microscopic theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phonon-polariton mediated dual electromagnetically induced transparency-like response in a THz metamaterial." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CG3QNIB7

@misc{pith2026250902151,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phonon-polariton mediated dual electromagnetically induced transparency-like response in a THz metamaterial},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CG3QNIB7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02151}
}
read the original abstract

Light and matter can intertwine to create entirely new quantum states in the so-called strong-coupling regime, allowing unprecedented control over electromagnetic waves. In this work, strong-coupling mediated polaritonic states are exploited to demonstrate tunable dual electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) like response in the terahertz (THz) frequency range using a micron-sized metamaterial system coupled with the phonon mode of a lead halide perovskite film. This architecture allows us to reversibly switch between the single and the dual EIT-like behavior without modifying the metamaterial structures. The dual EIT-like nature is further confirmed through the in-plane electric field distributions and the slow-light effects. The specific structural symmetry further allowed us to effectively switch between the dual EIT-like response and the conventional strong-coupling responses. Such tunability bears potential implications for developing metamaterial-phonon-based tunable THz devices such as switches, filters, and slow-light devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02151 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic representation of the EIT-like metamaterial unit cell that consists of a rod resonator with a pair of split-ring resonator (SRR) on either sides of the rod. Geometric parameters of the metamaterial are: L = 75 µm , l = 23.5 µm , w = 5 µm, g = 3 µm, s = 3 µm with a periodicity along the x and the y directions as 67 µm and 93 µm, respectively. The regions of in-plane field distribution, |E| = p |Ex| 2 + … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Schematic representation of MAPbI3 perovskite structure with the arrows denoting the Pb–I–Pb angular bending corresponding to the transverse optical (TO) phonon mode. (b) Simulated (red-dashed curve) and measured (blue-solid curve) transmittance spectra of the per￾ovskite film spin-coated on a z-cut quartz substrate showing the phonon mode at fph = 0.97 THz. Simulated transmittance spectra of (c) the rod and (d)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Schematic representation of the hybrid phonon-EIT metamaterial structure, where the phonon mode results from the spin-coated, crystallized MAPbI3 perovskite layer. (b) Measured and (c) simulated (red-solid curve) and theoretically obtained (black-dashed curve) transmittance spectra of the hybrid phonon-EIT system in the strong coupling regime. The transmittance peaks at 0.9 THz, 1.0 THz, and 1.2 THz are observed… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Normalized in-plane electric field distribution, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulated (red-dashed curve) and experimentally observe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulated (a-c) and experimental (d-f) transmittance spectra of the phonon-EIT hybrid metamaterial structure with rotational tunability for θ = 0◦ , 45◦ , and 90◦ . Simulated spectra of phonon-EIT hybrid metamaterial structure (g-i) for translational tunability. yup is…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1 D. G. Baranov, M. Wers¨ all, J. Cuadra, T. J. Antosiewicz, T. Shegai, Nove l nanostructures and materials for strong light-matter interactions, ACS Photonics 2018, 5,

    work page 2018

  2. [3]

    Choice of substrate

    D. Choice of substrate. S2. Strong coupling in SRR. S3. Near-field coupling in EIT metamaterial. S4. EIT peak amplitude variation. S5. EIT tunability . S6. Reproducibility of hybrid effect. S7. Energy-level diagram for hybrid system. S8. Theoretical model. 1 S1. EXPERIMENT AL METHOD A. THz-TDS set up We use a Ti:sapphire laser (with wavelength 800 nm, pulse...

    work page 2000

  3. [9]

    Yahiaoui, J

    34 R. Yahiaoui, J. A. Burrow, S. M. Mekonen, A. Sarangan, J. Mathews, I. Agha, T. A. Searles, Electromagnetically induced transparency control in terahertz metas urfaces based on bright- bright mode coupling, Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 155403. 35 L. K. Vaswani, B. S. Chouhan, A. Panwar, A. Bhattacharya, F. Moin, G. Kumar, Sin gle and dual-band electromagnetic...

    work page 2018

  4. [15]

    17 H. S. Kim, A. A. Khan, J. K. Park, S. Lee, Y. H. Ahn, Mechanical control of polariton ic states in lead halide perovskite phonons strongly coupled in THz microcavit y, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 10318. 18 J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, W. J. Stewart, Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory ...

    work page 2023

  5. [16]

    9 S. A. Maier, S. R. Andrews, L. Mart ´ ın-Moreno, F. J. Garc ´ ıa-Vidal, Terahertz surface plasmon- polariton propagation and focusing on periodically corrugated metal wires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 176805. 10 D. Ballarini, M. De Giorgi, E. Cancellieri, R. Houdr´ e, E. Giacobino, R. Cingolani, A. Bramati, G. Gigli, D. Sanvitto, All-optical polariton t...

    work page 2006

  6. [24]

    2 D. S. Dovzhenko, S. V. Ryabchuk, Y. P. Rakovich, I. R. Nabiev, Light-matt er interaction in the strong coupling regime: Configurations, conditions, and applications , Nanoscale 2018, 10,

    work page 2018

  7. [30]

    76 M. M. Kash, V. A. Sautenkov, A. S. Zibrov, L. Hollberg, G. R. Welch, M. D. Lu kin, Y. Rostovtsev, E. S. Fry, M. O. Scully, Ultraslow group velocity and en hanced nonlinear optical effects in a coherently driven hot atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82,

    work page 1999

  8. [35]

    72 A. M. Leguy, A. R. Go˜ ni, J. M. Frost, J. Skelton, F. Brivio, X. Rodr ´ ıgue z-Mart ´ ınez, O. J. Weber, A. Pallipurath, M. I. Alonso, M. Campoy-Quiles, M. T. Weller, Dynamic disorder, phonon lifetimes, and the assignment of modes to the vibrational spect ra of methylammonium lead halide perovskites, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 27051. 73 H. Kim,...

    work page 2016

Show all 53 references
  1. [36]

    25 C. L. Alzar, M. A. G. Martinez, P. Nussenzveig, Classical analog of electromagn etically induced transparency, Am. J. Phys. 2002, 70,

    2002

  2. [37]

    Singh, C

    26 R. Singh, C. Rockstuhl, F. Lederer, W. Zhang, Coupling between a dar k and a bright eigenmode in a terahertz metamaterial, Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 085111. 27 R. Singh, I. Al-Naib, D. R. Chowdhury, L. Cong, C. Rockstuhl, W. Zhang, P robing the tran- sition from an uncoupled t...

    2009

  3. [42]

    Dolling, C

    84 G. Dolling, C. Enkrich, M. Wegener, C. M. Soukoulis, S. Linden, Simu ltaneous negative phase and group velocity of light in a metamaterial, Science 2006, 312,

    2006

  4. [47]

    Similarly, for sample 2, both angles show excellent agreeme nt, with a slight difference in transmittance; however, the features are nicely reproduci ble (Figure S8c and S8d)

    For sample 1, for θ = 0 ◦ and 45 ◦, both the scans show good agreement as shown in Figure S8a and S8 b. Similarly, for sample 2, both angles show excellent agreeme nt, with a slight difference in transmittance; however, the features are nicely reproduci ble (Figure S8c and S8d)...

    2005

  5. [77]

    21 M. S. Khan, R. A. Shakoor, O. Fayyaz, E. M. Ahmed, A focused review on te chniques for achieving cloaking effects with metamaterials, Optik 2024, 297, 171575. 22 M. Kim, S. So, K. Yao, Y. Liu, J. Rho, Deep sub-wavelength nanofocusing of UV-visible light by hyperbolic metamat...

    2024

  6. [124]

    Manjappa, S

    30 M. Manjappa, S. P. Turaga, Y. Srivastava, A. A. Bettiol, R. Singh, Magnetic anni hilation of the dark mode in a strongly coupled bright-dark terahertz metamaterial , Opt. Lett. 2017, 42,

    2017

  7. [125]

    Razdolski, N

    87 I. Razdolski, N. C. Passler, C. R. Gubbin, C. J. Winta, R. Cernansky, F. Martini, A. Politi, S. A. Maier, M. Wolf, A. Paarmann, S. De Liberato, Second harmonic generation from s trongly coupled localized and propagating phonon-polariton modes, Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 125425....

    2018

  8. [295]

    4 Y. Xu, X. Wang, X. Chen, L. Zhang, Structure-based tunable metamaterials for e lectromag- netically induced transparency windows in low terahertz freque ncy, J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 127, 034501. 5 M. L. Wan, J. N. He, Y. L. Song, F. Q. Zhou, Electromagnetically induced transp a...

    2020

  9. [569]

    42 W. Suh, Z. Wang, S. Fan, Temporal coupled-mode theory and the presence of non-orthogonal modes in lossless multimode cavities, IEEE J. Quantum Electron 2004, 40,

    2004

  10. [594]

    Tamayama, T

    78 Y. Tamayama, T. Nakanishi, M. Kitano, Variable group delay in a metamaterial wi th field- gradient-induced transparency, Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 073102. 24 79 V. P. Sarin, R. K. Raj, V. Kesavath, Negative group-delay assisted anomalous propagation in stacked split ring resona...

    2012

  11. [613]

    La-o-Vorakiat, H

    71 C. La-o-Vorakiat, H. Xia, J. Kadro, T. Salim, D. Zhao, T. Ahmed, Y. M. Lam, J.-X. Zhu, R. A. Marcus, M.-E. Michel-Beyerle, E. E. M. Chia, Phonon mode trans formation across the orthohombic-tetragonal phase transition in a lead iodide perovskite CH 3NH3PbI3: A terahertz time...

    2016

  12. [633]

    Chiam, R

    38 S.-Y. Chiam, R. Singh, C. Rockstuhl, F. Lederer, W. Zhang, A. A. Bettiol , Analogue of elec- tromagnetically induced transparency in a terahertz metamaterial, Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 153103. 39 Y. Guo, L. Yan, W. Pan, B. Luo, K. Wen, Z. Guo, X. Luo, Electromagnetically indu ...

    2009

  13. [687]

    74 S. M. Mekonen, D. Jain, S. Oh, N. P. Armitage, Coupled metamaterial-phonon terahertz range polaritons in a topological insulator, ACS Photonics 2024, 11,

    2024

  14. [892]

    85 L. Zhu, H. Li, L. Dong, W. Zhou, M. Rong, X. Zhang, J. Guo, Dual-band electromagneti cally induced transparency (EIT) terahertz metamaterial sensor, Opt. Mater. Express 2021, 11,

    2021

  15. [1057]

    Scalari, C

    15 G. Scalari, C. Maissen, D. Turˇ cinkov´ a, D. Hagenm¨ uller, S. DeLiberato, C. Ciuti, C. Reichl, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, M. Beck, J. Faist, Ultrastrong coupling of th e cyclotron transition of a 2D electron gas to a THz metamaterial, Science 2012, 335,

    2012

  16. [1103]

    64 S. Pal, H. Nong, S. Markmann, N. Kukharchyk, S. R. Valentin, S. Scholz, A. Lud wig, C. Bock, U. Kunze, A. D. Wieck, N. Jukam, Ultrawide electrical tuning of light m atter interaction in a high electron mobility transistor structure, Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16812. 65 K. Mondal, A...

    2015

  17. [1151]

    29 S. J. Mohan Rao, D. Kumar, G. Kumar, D. R. Chowdhury, Modulating the ne ar field coupling through resonator displacement in planar terahertz metamaterials, J. Infrared Milli. Terahertz Waves 2017, 38,

    2017

  18. [1179]

    Sarkar, K

    14 R. Sarkar, K. M. Devi, D. Ghindani, S. S. Prabhu, D. R. Chowdhury, G . Kumar, Polarization independent double-band electromagnetically induced transparenc y effect in terahertz metama- terials, J. Opt. 2020, 22, 035105. 15 A. Lovera, B. Gallinet, P. Nordlander, O. J. F. Mart...

    2020

  19. [1323]

    16 M. R. Vanner, I. Pikovski, M. S. Kim, Towards optomechanical quantum state reconstruction of mechanical motion, Ann. Phys. 2015, 527,

    2015

  20. [1386]

    49 S. Hu, W. He, M. Tong, Z. Xu, Y. Hu, X. A. Cheng, T. Jiang, Dual-dimensional EIT man ipu- lation for angle-multiplexed ultrafast terahertz switching, ACS Photonics 2022, 10,

    2022

  21. [1473]

    13 M. F. Askarani, A. Das, J. H. Davidson, G. C. Amaral, N. Sinclair, J. A. Slater, S. Marzban, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, D. Oblak, W. Tittel, Long-lived solid-state optic al memory for high-rate quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 220502. 14 J. Lee, S. Jung, P. Y. C...

    2021

  22. [1485]

    Manjappa, S

    51 M. Manjappa, S. Y. Chiam, L. Cong, A. A. Bettiol, W. Zhang, R. Singh, Tailoring th e slow light behavior in terahertz metasurfaces, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 181101. 52 T. T. Kim, H. D. Kim, R. Zhao, S. Oh, T. Ha, D. S. Chung, Y. H. Lee, M. Min, S. Z hang, Electrically t...

    2015

  23. [1489]

    6 H. S. Kim, N. Y. Ha, J.-Y. Park, S. Lee, D.-S.; Kim, Y. H. Ahn, Phonon-polaritons i n lead halide perovskite film hybridized with THz metamaterials, Nano Lett. 2020, 20,

    2020

  24. [1511]

    Kodigala, T

    43 A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, B. Kant´ e, Engineering resonance dynamics of pl asmon hybridized systems, J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 023110. 44 Y. Liang, E. Bochkova, S. N. Burokur, A. de Lustrac, H. Benisty, A. Lupu, Engin eering of the Fano resonance spectral response with non-H...

    2015

  25. [1778]

    11 S. S. Demirchyan, I. Y. Chestnov, A. P. Alodjants, M. M. Glazov, A. V. Ka vokin, Qubits based on polariton Rabi oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 196403. 12 N. H. Bonadeo, J. Erland, D. Gammon, D. Park, D. S.; Katzer, D. G. Steel, Coh erent optical control of the qua...

    2014

  26. [1780]

    19 20 R. A. Shelby, D. R. Smith, S. Schultz, Experimental verification of a negative index of refraction, Science 2001, 292,

    2001

  27. [1791]

    Singh, I

    17 6 R. Singh, I. Al-Naib, D. R. Chowdhury, L. Cong, C. Rockstuhl, W. Zhang, P robing the tran- sition from an uncoupled to a strong near-field coupled regime between bright and dark mode resonators in metasurfaces, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 081108. 7 R. Singh, C. Rockstuhl,...

    2014 arXiv

  28. [1800]

    53 P. Q. Liu, I. J. Luxmoore, S. A. Mikhailov, N. A. Savostianova, F. Valmorra, J . Faist, G. R. Nash, Highly tunable hybrid metamaterials employing split-ring res onators strongly coupled to graphene surface plasmons, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6,

    2015

  29. [2025]

    11 X. Liu, J. Gu, R. Singh, Y. Ma, J. Zhu, Z. Tian, M. He, J. Han, W. Zhang, Electr omagnetically induced transparency in terahertz plasmonic metamaterials via dual e xcitation pathways of the dark mode, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 131101. 12 M. Chen, Z. Xiao, F. Lv, Z. Cui, ...

    2012

  30. [2075]

    19 J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, D. R. Smith, Controlling electromagnetic fields, Science 2006, 312,

    2006

  31. [2104]

    Pons-Valencia, F

    60 P. Pons-Valencia, F. J. Alfaro-Mozaz, M. M. Wiecha, V. Biolek, I. Dolado, S. V ´ elez, P. Li, P. Alonso-Gonz´ alez, F. Casanova, L. E. Hueso, L. Mart ´ ın-Moreno, R. Hillenbrand, A. Y. Nikitin, Launching of hyperbolic phonon-polaritons in h-BN slabs by resonant metal plasmo...

    2019

  32. [2106]

    31 K. M. Devi, A. K. Sarma, D. R. Chowdhury, G. Kumar, Plasmon induced tr ansparency effect through alternately coupled resonators in terahertz metamaterial, Opt. Express 2017, 25, 10484. 32 R. Yahiaoui, M. Manjappa, Y. K. Srivastava, R. Singh, Active control and swit ching of ...

    2017

  33. [2109]

    Suresh, O

    86 S. Suresh, O. Reshef, M. Z. Alam, J. Upham, M. Karimi, R. W. Boyd, Enh anced nonlinear op- tical responses of layered epsilon-near-zero metamaterials at visib le frequencies, ACS Photonics 2020, 8,

    2020

  34. [2182]

    Degl’Innocenti, H

    50 R. Degl’Innocenti, H. Lin, M. Navarro-C ´ ıa, Recent progress in terahertz metamaterial modula- tors, Nanophotonics 2022, 11,

    2022

  35. [2242]

    75 X. Liu, T. Galfsky, Z. Sun, F. Xia, E.-C. Lin, Y.-H. Lee, S. K´ ena-Cohen, V. M . Menon, Strong light-matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals, Nat. Photonics 2015, 9,

    2015

  36. [2945]

    2 Y. Wang, J. He, H. Chen, J. Chen, R. Zhu, P. Ma, A. Towers, Y. Lin, A. J. Gesqu iere, S.-T. Wu, Y. Dong, Ultrastable, highly luminescent organic-inorganic perovski te-polymer composite films, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10710. 3 A. Mei, X. Li, L. Liu, Z. Ku, T. Liu, Y. Rong, M. Hu,...

    2016

  37. [3242]

    61 X. Liu, J. Gu, R. Singh, Y. Ma, J. Zhu, Z. Tian, M. He, J. Han, W. Zhang, Electr omagnetically induced transparency in terahertz plasmonic metamaterials via dual e xcitation pathways of the dark mode, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 131101. 62 S. Zhang, D. A. Genov, Y. Wang, M...

    2012

  38. [3589]

    3 F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, T. W. Ebbesen, Manipulating matter by s trong coupling to vacuum fields, Science 2021, 373, eabd0336. 4 P. T¨ orm¨ a, W. L. Barnes, Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 2014, 78, 013901. 5 H....

    2021

  39. [3710]

    83 L. Zhu, T. C. Li, Z. D. Zhang, J. Guo, L. Dong, D. Q. Zhang, Dual-band asymmetri c transmis- sion based on electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) effect i n a microstrip transmission line, Appl. Phys. A 2020, 126,

    2020

  40. [4527]

    16 Y. Ling, L. Huang, W. Hong, T. Liu, J. Luan, W. Liu, J. Lai, H. Li, Polarization-controlled dynamically switchable plasmon-induced transparency in plasmonic m etamaterial, Nanoscale 2018, 10, 19517. 18

    2018

  41. [5229]

    77 L. V. Hau, S. E. Harris, Z. Dutton, C. H. Behroozi, Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas, Nature 1999, 397,

    1999

  42. [6690]

    Zhang, H

    18 7 Z. Zhang, H. Hirori, F. Sekiguchi, A. Shimazaki, Y. Iwasaki, T. Nakamura, A. Wakami ya, Y. Kanemitsu, Ultrastrong coupling between THz phonons and photons caused b y an enhanced vacuum electric field, Phys. Rev. Res. 2021, 3, L032021. 8 P. Berini, I. De Leon, Surface plasm...

    2021

  43. [7086]

    Harris, Electromagnetically induced transparency, Phys

    24 E. Harris, Electromagnetically induced transparency, Phys. Today 1997, 50,

    1997

  44. [7158]

    Lawrence, and N

    45 M. Lawrence, and N. Xu, and X. Zhang, and L. Cong, and J. Han, and W. Zhang, and S. Zhang, Manifestation of PT symmetry breaking in polarization space with terahe rtz metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 093901. 46 A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, B. Kant´ e, Exceptional point...

    2014

  45. [8969]

    54 H. Wang, Y. Zhang, F. Hu, M. Jiang, L. Zhang, W. Zhang, J. Han, Active dual-control ter ahertz electromagnetically induced transparency analog in VO 2 metasurface, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 123, 061701. 55 C. Li, W. Li, S. Duan, J. Wu, B. Chen, S. Yang, R. Su, C. Jiang, C. Zh...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.