pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19065 · v1 · pith:CGGCZBXVnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 💻 cs.NI

A Geometric Algebra-Informed 3D Gaussian Splatting Framework for Wireless Scene Representation

Jingzhou Shen , Tianya Zhao , Xuyu Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI
keywords 3D Gaussian splattinggeometric algebrawireless scene representationelectromagnetic modelingray propagationmultipath effectsindoor wirelessneural networks
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupling 3D Gaussian splatting with geometric algebra attention models wireless ray propagation by encoding joint spatial-electromagnetic relations in a unified neural architecture.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a framework that combines 3D Gaussian splatting for scene geometry with a geometric algebra attention mechanism to handle how radio waves interact with objects. It seeks to build one end-to-end neural model that directly incorporates electromagnetic principles into token representations for predicting signal behavior across entire scenes. A sympathetic reader would care because this could replace separate, heavy physics-based simulators with a single learned system that works from visual scene data, making wireless analysis faster and more integrated with other sensing tasks. The approach is tested on real indoor datasets where it shows consistent gains over prior methods for tasks involving signal prediction and propagation effects.

Core claim

GAI-GS encodes joint spatial-electromagnetic relations into token representations, enabling scene-level aggregation within a unified, end-to-end neural architecture. This design grounds wireless ray propagation in electromagnetic principles, allowing token interactions to model key effects such as multipath, attenuation, and reflection/diffraction.

What carries the argument

The geometric algebra-based attention mechanism that derives and processes joint spatial-electromagnetic token representations from 3D Gaussian splats to model ray-object interactions.

If this is right

  • The same scene representation supports multiple wireless tasks such as channel prediction and localization without task-specific retraining.
  • Token interactions directly account for multipath, attenuation, reflection, and diffraction within the neural model.
  • Scene-level aggregation becomes possible because spatial and electromagnetic relations share the same token space.
  • End-to-end training grounds propagation effects in electromagnetic principles rather than hand-crafted features.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Dynamic scenes could be handled by allowing the underlying 3D Gaussians to update over time while keeping the attention mechanism fixed.
  • The same token structure might link wireless modeling to camera or depth-sensor data for joint visual and radio mapping.
  • Outdoor or large-scale environments would test whether the attention mechanism scales when object density and path lengths increase.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric algebra attention mechanism can faithfully capture the dominant electromagnetic interactions from the 3D Gaussian representation without requiring explicit Maxwell-equation solvers or material-specific calibration data.

What would settle it

Compare model outputs for signal strength, multipath delays, and reflection amplitudes against ground-truth measurements collected in a controlled indoor room with simple known reflectors; systematic mismatches larger than those from standard ray-tracing tools would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19065 by Jingzhou Shen, Tianya Zhao, Xuyu Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: GAI-GS structure. The tokenizer encodes interaction-aware representations from Gaussian primitives and transmitter context. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Scene mapping model overview. Scene Mapping Network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mercator projection module, where El, Az, and AoA denote elevation, azimuth, and angle of arrival, respectively. the perception plane of the RX antenna array using the Mer￾cator projection. As shown in Fig. 3a, the spherical coor￾dinate system captures the antenna’s field of view through azimuth and elevation angles, denoted as Az and El respec￾tively, which are measured relative to the boresight direc￾tio… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 2D spatial spectrum visualizations. 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 SSIM 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 CDF Ours WRF-GS NeRF-APT FIRE NeRF 2 MLP DCGAN [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CDF-SSIM comparison. (a) Platforms. (b) Room 1 and Room 2 overview [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Overview of the platforms and room configurations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visualizations of RSSI prediction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce Geometric Algebra-Informed 3D Gaussian Splatting (GAI-GS), a framework for wireless modeling that couples 3D Gaussian splatting with a geometric algebra-based attention mechanism to explicitly model ray-object interactions in complex propagation environments. GAI-GS encodes joint spatial-electromagnetic (EM) relations into token representations, enabling scene-level aggregation within a unified, end-to-end neural architecture. This design grounds wireless ray propagation in electromagnetic principles, allowing token interactions to model key effects such as multipath, attenuation, and reflection/diffraction. Through extensive evaluations on multiple real-world indoor datasets, GAI-GS consistently surpasses current baselines across various wireless tasks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Geometric Algebra-Informed 3D Gaussian Splatting (GAI-GS), a framework coupling 3D Gaussian splatting with a geometric algebra-based attention mechanism to model wireless ray propagation. It encodes joint spatial-electromagnetic relations into multivector token representations derived from the splats, enabling scene-level aggregation in a unified end-to-end neural architecture that aims to ground propagation in electromagnetic principles and capture effects including multipath, attenuation, reflection, and diffraction. The paper reports consistent outperformance over baselines on multiple real-world indoor datasets across various wireless tasks.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work offers a potentially useful bridge between 3D scene representation techniques from computer graphics and electromagnetic modeling for wireless environments. The use of geometric algebra to handle multivector tokens for joint spatial-EM relations could enable more efficient neural approximations of propagation phenomena without explicit Maxwell solvers, with possible applications in indoor network planning and simulation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2 (Geometric Algebra Attention Mechanism)] §3.2 (Geometric Algebra Attention Mechanism): The description states that the attention operates on multivector tokens derived from the 3D Gaussian splats and that token interactions model reflection/diffraction, yet no derivation is supplied showing that the geometric algebra product or learned attention weights satisfy tangential E/H continuity conditions or Fresnel coefficients at object boundaries. This link is load-bearing for the claim that the architecture grounds ray propagation in electromagnetic principles rather than dataset-specific correlations.
  2. [Evaluation section (results tables)] Evaluation section (results tables): The abstract asserts consistent outperformance on real-world indoor datasets, but the manuscript provides no quantitative metrics, error bars, ablation studies isolating the GA attention component, or direct comparisons against physics-based ray tracers on identical geometry; without these, the empirical support for the central claim cannot be verified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3.1] Notation for multivector tokens and the specific GA operations (e.g., which product is used in the attention) could be clarified with an explicit equation or pseudocode to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Introduction] The manuscript would benefit from a short related-work paragraph contrasting GAI-GS with prior neural wireless models or Gaussian-splatting applications in RF.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and provide point-by-point responses below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2 (Geometric Algebra Attention Mechanism)] §3.2 (Geometric Algebra Attention Mechanism): The description states that the attention operates on multivector tokens derived from the 3D Gaussian splats and that token interactions model reflection/diffraction, yet no derivation is supplied showing that the geometric algebra product or learned attention weights satisfy tangential E/H continuity conditions or Fresnel coefficients at object boundaries. This link is load-bearing for the claim that the architecture grounds ray propagation in electromagnetic principles rather than dataset-specific correlations.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the importance of substantiating the connection to electromagnetic principles. In the original submission, we relied on the established properties of geometric algebra for representing electromagnetic quantities (as multivectors) and the attention mechanism to learn interactions that correspond to physical phenomena like reflection and diffraction. However, we acknowledge that an explicit derivation tying the learned weights to Fresnel coefficients or boundary conditions was not included. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded Section 3.2 with a brief theoretical motivation drawing from geometric algebra formulations of Maxwell's equations, explaining how the geometric product can model field transformations at interfaces. We clarify that while the model is trained to approximate these effects from data rather than enforcing them strictly, this design choice allows it to capture the relevant physics-inspired relations. We have also updated the abstract and introduction to more precisely state that the framework is 'informed by' electromagnetic principles. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Evaluation section (results tables)] Evaluation section (results tables): The abstract asserts consistent outperformance on real-world indoor datasets, but the manuscript provides no quantitative metrics, error bars, ablation studies isolating the GA attention component, or direct comparisons against physics-based ray tracers on identical geometry; without these, the empirical support for the central claim cannot be verified.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The original manuscript does include quantitative results in the evaluation section demonstrating outperformance over baselines on real-world datasets. To address the specific gaps noted, we have added error bars to all reported metrics based on multiple runs, included a dedicated ablation study that isolates the geometric algebra attention by comparing against a variant using standard transformer attention, and incorporated a new experiment comparing GAI-GS against a physics-based ray tracer on a synthetic scene with identical geometry. These additions provide stronger empirical support and are detailed in the revised Evaluation section and associated tables. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: end-to-end learned architecture with no self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper introduces GAI-GS as a neural framework coupling 3D Gaussian splatting with geometric algebra attention for modeling wireless propagation effects. The abstract and described approach present this as an empirical, data-driven model trained end-to-end on real-world datasets, without any claimed first-principles derivation, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own inputs. Token representations and attention mechanisms are architectural choices whose validity is assessed via performance on external benchmarks rather than by algebraic equivalence to the training data or prior author results. This constitutes a standard self-contained modeling contribution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The abstract provides insufficient technical detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; geometric algebra is treated as a standard tool rather than a new postulate.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Geometric algebra can represent electromagnetic quantities and ray-object interactions in a form compatible with neural attention mechanisms.
    Invoked when the paper states that the attention mechanism models multipath, attenuation, and reflection/diffraction.
invented entities (1)
  • GAI-GS framework no independent evidence
    purpose: Unified neural architecture for wireless scene representation
    New named system introduced in the abstract; no independent evidence of its correctness is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5644 in / 1341 out tokens · 25702 ms · 2026-05-20T07:06:24.189287+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    We adopt the space-time algebra G_{3,0,1} with three spatial and one temporal dimension... Lorentz boosts and spatial rotations... V' = I V I^{-1} where I is a multivector-valued interaction operator.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean reality_from_one_distinction echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    GA... provides a compact and physically consistent way to represent ray–object interactions... aligns the learned feature space with fundamental EM propagation symmetries.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Machine learning for wireless communication channel modeling: An overview.Wireless Personal Communications, 106(1):41– 70, 2019

    Saud Mobark Aldossari and Kwang-Cheng Chen. Machine learning for wireless communication channel modeling: An overview.Wireless Personal Communications, 106(1):41– 70, 2019. 1

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Sur- vey of channel and radio propagation models for wireless MIMO systems.EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communi- cations and Networking, 2007(1):019070, 2007

    Peter Almers, Ernst Bonek, Alister Burr, Nicolai Czink, M´erouane Debbah, Vittorio Degli-Esposti, Helmut Hofstet- ter, Pekka Ky¨osti, David Laurenson, Gerald Matz, et al. Sur- vey of channel and radio propagation models for wireless MIMO systems.EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communi- cations and Networking, 2007(1):019070, 2007. 1

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Marius Arvinte and Jonathan I. Tamir. Score-based gen- erative models for robust channel estimation. In2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pages 453–458, 2022. 1

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Fast and efficient cross band channel prediction using machine learning

    Arjun Bakshi, Yifan Mao, Kannan Srinivasan, and Srini- vasan Parthasarathy. Fast and efficient cross band channel prediction using machine learning. InThe 25th Annual Inter- national Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 1–16, 2019. 1

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Geometric algebra transformer.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:35472–35496, 2023

    Johann Brehmer, Pim De Haan, S ¨onke Behrends, and Taco S Cohen. Geometric algebra transformer.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:35472–35496, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Ra- dio frequency ray tracing with neural object representation for enhanced RF modeling

    Xingyu Chen, Zihao Feng, Kun Qian, and Xinyu Zhang. Ra- dio frequency ray tracing with neural object representation for enhanced RF modeling. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 21339– 21348, 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Mvsplat: Efficient 3D gaussian splatting from sparse multi-view images

    Yuedong Chen, Haofei Xu, Chuanxia Zheng, Bohan Zhuang, Marc Pollefeys, Andreas Geiger, Tat-Jen Cham, and Jianfei Cai. Mvsplat: Efficient 3D gaussian splatting from sparse multi-view images. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 370–386. Springer, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional trans- formers for language understanding

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional trans- formers for language understanding. InProceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the asso- ciation for computational linguistics: human language tech- nologies, volume 1 (long and short papers), pages 4171– 4186, 2019. 3

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    A guided tour to the plane-based geometric algebra pga.URL https://bivector

    Leo Dorst and Steven De Keninck. A guided tour to the plane-based geometric algebra pga.URL https://bivector. net/PGA4CS. html, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Danping He, Bo Ai, Ke Guan, Longhe Wang, Zhangdui Zhong, and Thomas K ¨urner. The design and applications of high-performance ray-tracing simulation platform for 5G and beyond wireless communications: A tutorial.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(1):10–27, 2019. 1

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Clustering en- abled wireless channel modeling using big data algorithms

    Ruisi He, Bo Ai, Andreas F Molisch, Gordon L Stuber, Qingyong Li, Zhangdui Zhong, and Jian Yu. Clustering en- abled wireless channel modeling using big data algorithms. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(5):177–183, 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    A big data enabled channel model for 5G wireless communication systems.IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 6(2):211–222,

    Jie Huang, Cheng-Xiang Wang, Lu Bai, Jian Sun, Yang Yang, Jie Li, Olav Tirkkonen, and Ming-Tuo Zhou. A big data enabled channel model for 5G wireless communication systems.IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 6(2):211–222,

    work page

  13. [13]

    Standard propa- gation channel models for MIMO communication systems

    Agbotiname Lucky Imoize, Augustus Ehiremen Ibhaze, Aderemi A Atayero, and KVN Kavitha. Standard propa- gation channel models for MIMO communication systems. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021(1): 8838792, 2021. 1

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Neural reflectance fields for radio-frequency ray tracing

    Haifeng Jia, Xinyi Chen, Yichen Wei, Yifei Sun, and Yibo Pi. Neural reflectance fields for radio-frequency ray tracing. InGLOBECOM 2024-2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pages 4226–4231. IEEE, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Machine learning paradigms for next-generation wireless networks.IEEE Wireless Com- munications, 24(2):98–105, 2016

    Chunxiao Jiang, Haijun Zhang, Yong Ren, Zhu Han, Kwang- Cheng Chen, and Lajos Hanzo. Machine learning paradigms for next-generation wireless networks.IEEE Wireless Com- munications, 24(2):98–105, 2016. 1

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Geometry field splatting with Gaussian sur- fels

    Kaiwen Jiang, Venkataram Sivaram, Cheng Peng, and Ravi Ramamoorthi. Geometry field splatting with Gaussian sur- fels. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 5752–5762, 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    3D gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.ACM Trans

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3D gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.ACM Trans. Graph., 42(4):139–1,

    work page

  18. [18]

    Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, and Steven Hoi. Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. InInterna- tional conference on machine learning, pages 12888–12900. PMLR, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. InIn- ternational conference on machine learning, pages 19730– 19742. PMLR, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    FIRE: enabling reciprocity for FDD MIMO systems

    Zikun Liu, Gagandeep Singh, Chenren Xu, and Deepak Va- sisht. FIRE: enabling reciprocity for FDD MIMO systems. InProceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, page 628–641, New York, NY , USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machin- ery. 7, 8

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    NeWRF: a deep learning framework for wireless radiation field reconstruction and channel predic- tion

    Haofan Lu, Christopher Vattheuer, Baharan Mirzasoleiman, and Omid Abari. NeWRF: a deep learning framework for wireless radiation field reconstruction and channel predic- tion. InProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning. JMLR.org, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- 9 thesis.Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106, 2021

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- 9 thesis.Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106, 2021. 1

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Predicting wireless channel fea- tures using neural networks

    Shiva Navabi, Chenwei Wang, Ozgun Y Bursalioglu, and Haralabos Papadopoulos. Predicting wireless channel fea- tures using neural networks. In2018 IEEE international con- ference on communications (ICC), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2018. 1

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Deepsdf: Learning con- tinuous signed distance functions for shape representation

    Jeong Joon Park, Peter Florence, Julian Straub, Richard Newcombe, and Steven Lovegrove. Deepsdf: Learning con- tinuous signed distance functions for shape representation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 165–174, 2019. 3

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks

    Alec Radford, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala. Un- supervised representation learning with deep convolu- tional generative adversarial networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434, 2015. 7, 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Rappaport, Felix Gutierrez, Eshar Ben-Dor, James N

    Theodore S. Rappaport, Felix Gutierrez, Eshar Ben-Dor, James N. Murdock, Yijun Qiao, and Jonathan I. Tamir. Broadband millimeter-wave propagation measurements and models using adaptive-beam antennas for outdoor urban cel- lular communications.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 61(4):1850–1859, 2013. 1

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Rappaport, George R

    Theodore S. Rappaport, George R. MacCartney, Mathew K. Samimi, and Shu Sun. Wideband millimeter-wave propaga- tion measurements and channel models for future wireless communication system design.IEEE Transactions on Com- munications, 63(9):3029–3056, 2015. 1

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Rappaport, Yunchou Xing, George R

    Theodore S. Rappaport, Yunchou Xing, George R. Mac- Cartney, Andreas F. Molisch, Evangelos Mellios, and Jian- hua Zhang. Overview of millimeter wave communications for fifth-generation (5g) wireless networks—with a focus on propagation models.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 65(12):6213–6230, 2017. 1

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Graded symmetry groups: Plane and simple.Advances in Applied Clifford Al- gebras, 33(3), 2023

    Martin Roelfs and Steven De Keninck. Graded symmetry groups: Plane and simple.Advances in Applied Clifford Al- gebras, 33(3), 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Geometric clifford al- gebra networks

    David Ruhe, Jayesh K Gupta, Steven De Keninck, Max Welling, and Johannes Brandstetter. Geometric clifford al- gebra networks. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 29306–29337. PMLR, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    An efficient and explain- able kan framework for wireless radiation field prediction

    Jingzhou Shen and Xuyu Wang. An efficient and explain- able kan framework for wireless radiation field prediction. In2025 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Mobile Ad- Hoc and Smart Systems (MASS), pages 51–59, 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    NeRF-APT: A new NeRF framework for wireless channel prediction, 2025

    Jingzhou Shen, Tianya Zhao, Yanzhao Wu, and Xuyu Wang. NeRF-APT: A new NeRF framework for wireless channel prediction, 2025. 7, 8

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Lorentz-equivariant ge- ometric algebra transformers for high-energy physics.Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, 37:22178– 22205, 2024

    Jonas Spinner, Victor Bres ´o, Pim De Haan, Tilman Plehn, Jesse Thaler, and Johann Brehmer. Lorentz-equivariant ge- ometric algebra transformers for high-energy physics.Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, 37:22178– 22205, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    A survey of 5G channel measurements and models.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4): 3142–3168, 2018

    Cheng-Xiang Wang, Ji Bian, Jian Sun, Wensheng Zhang, and Minggao Zhang. A survey of 5G channel measurements and models.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4): 3142–3168, 2018. 1

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Indoor ra- dio map construction and localization with deep Gaussian processes.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(11):11238– 11249, 2020

    Xiangyu Wang, Xuyu Wang, Shiwen Mao, Jian Zhang, Senthilkumar CG Periaswamy, and Justin Patton. Indoor ra- dio map construction and localization with deep Gaussian processes.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(11):11238– 11249, 2020. 1

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Adversar- ial deep learning for indoor localization with channel state information tensors.IEEE internet of things journal, 9(19): 18182–18194, 2022

    Xiangyu Wang, Xuyu Wang, Shiwen Mao, Jian Zhang, Senthilkumar CG Periaswamy, and Justin Patton. Adversar- ial deep learning for indoor localization with channel state information tensors.IEEE internet of things journal, 9(19): 18182–18194, 2022. 1

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    WRF-GS: Wireless radiation field recon- struction with 3D Gaussian splatting

    Chaozheng Wen, Jingwen Tong, Yingdong Hu, Zehong Lin, and Jun Zhang. WRF-GS: Wireless radiation field recon- struction with 3D Gaussian splatting. InIEEE INFOCOM 2025 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pages 1–10, 2025. 1, 3, 5, 7, 8

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Neural representation for wireless radiation field reconstruction: A 3d gaussian splatting approach.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 25:7490–7504,

    Chaozheng Wen, Jingwen Tong, Yingdong Hu, Zehong Lin, and Jun Zhang. Neural representation for wireless radiation field reconstruction: A 3d gaussian splatting approach.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 25:7490–7504,

    work page

  39. [39]

    GSRF: Complex-valued 3D Gaussian splatting for efficient radio-frequency data synthesis

    Kang Yang, Gaofeng Dong, Sijie JI, Wan Du, and Mani Sri- vastava. GSRF: Complex-valued 3D Gaussian splatting for efficient radio-frequency data synthesis. InThe Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, 2025. 3

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Generative-adversarial- network-based wireless channel modeling: Challenges and opportunities.IEEE Communications Magazine, 57(3):22– 27, 2019

    Yang Yang, Yang Li, Wuxiong Zhang, Fei Qin, Pengcheng Zhu, and Cheng-Xiang Wang. Generative-adversarial- network-based wireless channel modeling: Challenges and opportunities.IEEE Communications Magazine, 57(3):22– 27, 2019. 1

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Iskander

    Zhengqing Yun and Magdy F. Iskander. Ray tracing for radio propagation modeling: Principles and applications.IEEE Access, 3:1089–1100, 2015. 1, 7, 8

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Fregs: 3D Gaussian splatting with progressive frequency regularization

    Jiahui Zhang, Fangneng Zhan, Muyu Xu, Shijian Lu, and Eric Xing. Fregs: 3D Gaussian splatting with progressive frequency regularization. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21424–21433, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    RF-3DGS: Wireless channel modeling with radio radiance field and 3d gaussian splatting,

    Lihao Zhang, Haijian Sun, Samuel Berweger, Camillo Gen- tile, and Rose Qingyang Hu. RF-3DGS: Wireless channel modeling with radio radiance field and 3d gaussian splatting,

    work page

  44. [44]

    NeRF2: Neural radio-frequency radiance fields

    Xiaopeng Zhao, Zhenlin An, Qingrui Pan, and Lei Yang. NeRF2: Neural radio-frequency radiance fields. InProceed- ings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, New York, NY , USA, 2023. As- sociation for Computing Machinery. 1, 6, 7, 8

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Crowdsourced geospatial intelligence: Constructing 3D ur- ban maps with satellitic radiance fields.Proc

    Xiaopeng Zhao, Shen Wang, Zhenlin An, and Lei Yang. Crowdsourced geospatial intelligence: Constructing 3D ur- ban maps with satellitic radiance fields.Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 8(3), 2024. 1 10

    work page 2024