Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mobility-Aware Analysis of 5G and B5G Cellular Networks: A Tutorial

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.02719 v1 pith:CHRWZ2BF submitted 2018-05-07 cs.NI

classification cs.NI
keywords cellularnetworksmobility-awaremodelsnetworkanalysismobilityperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Providing network connectivity to mobile users is a key requirement for cellular wireless networks. User mobility impacts network performance as well as user perceived service quality. For efficient network dimensioning and optimization, it is therefore required to characterize the mobility-aware network performance metrics such as the handoff rate, handoff probability, sojourn time, direction switch rate, and users' throughput or coverage. This characterization is particularly challenging for heterogeneous, dense/ultra-dense, and random cellular networks such as the emerging 5G and beyond 5G (B5G) networks. In this article, we provide a tutorial on mobility-aware performance analysis of both the spatially random and non-random, single-tier and multi-tier cellular networks. We first provide a summary of the different mobility models which include purely random models, spatially correlated, and temporally correlated models. The differences among various mobility models, their statistical properties, and their pros and cons are presented. We then describe two main analytical approaches for mobility-aware performance analysis of both random and non-random cellular networks. For the first approach, we describe a general methodology and present several case studies for different cellular network tessellations such as square lattice, hexagon lattice, single-tier and multi-tier models in which base-stations (BSs) follow a homogeneous Poisson Point Process (PPP). For the second approach, we also outline the general methodology. In addition, we discuss some limitations/imperfections of the existing techniques and provide corrections to these imperfections. Finally, we point out specific 5G application scenarios where the impact of mobility would be significant and outline the challenges associated with mobility-aware analysis of those scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mobility in the Sky: Performance and Mobility Analysis for Cellular-Connected UAVs

    cs.IT 2019-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Cooperative multi-point transmission raises drone coverage from about 28% to 60% at low SIR thresholds, but high-altitude drone coverage remains below ground coverage due to down-tilted base station antennas.

Pith tools